REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL

Similar documents
Minor Amendments to the Street and Traffic By-law 2849 and Skateboards in Protected Bike Lanes

1 To provide direction to Administration when determining the appropriate Pedestrian Crossing Control Device for a particular location.

NEIGHBOURHOOD TRAFFIC COMMITTEE POLICY AND PROCEDURE

CITY OF SAINT JOHN TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY

Document 2 - City of Ottawa Pedestrian Crossover (PXO) Program

River Road - Proposed Road Safety Enhancement Measures

TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY & PROCEDURES

City of Albert Lea Policy and Procedure Manual 4.10 ALBERT LEA CROSSWALK POLICY

GLOSSARY CROSSWALK. CROSSING TYPES

Chapter 4 TOOLBOX AND SAMPLE BIKE BOULEVARD LAYOUT

Appendix A. Road Classification Review of Outstanding Issues and Proposed Classifications (All Wards) Staff Report Road Classification System

Road Alterations - Wellington Street East, Church Street, and Front Street Intersection

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

TRAFFIC CALMING TOOLBOX. For the residents of the City of Decatur, Georgia

APPENDIX B1. CROSS-REFERENCE GUIDE TO THE OHIO REVISED CODE

Installation of Traffic Signals and Pedestrian Crossings

Item No Halifax Regional Council July 19, 2016

Pedestrian Crosswalk Audit

Zlatko Krstulich, P.Eng. City of O9awa

Traffic Calming Policy

Governance and Priorities Committee Report For the July 2, 2015 Meeting

Coquitlam Cross-town Bike Route Improving Bicycle Facilities in a Mature Suburban Environment

TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY NEWTOWN TOWNSHIP DELAWARE COUNTY, PA

Improving Cyclist Safety at the Dundas Street West and Sterling Road Intersection

P.O. Box 1749 Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3A5 Canada Item No Halifax Regional Council May 9, 2017

City of Saline. Complete Streets Ordinance

CITY OF SASKATOON COUNCIL POLICY

COUNCIL POLICY NAME: COUNCIL REFERENCE: 06/119 06/377 09/1C 10llC 12/1C INDEX REFERENCE: POLICY BACKGROUND

Item No Transportation Standing Committee June 23, 2016

SCHOOL CROSSING PROTECTION CRITERIA

Traffic Circulation & Pedestrian Safety Study

5 Circulation & Parking

Purpose: Financial Implications and Impact Statement: It is estimated that the cost to implement:

Item No. 14 Town of Atherton

10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE

Pedestrian Crossing Guidelines 2016

SCHOOL CROSSING PROTECTION CRITERIA

Chapter VISION, MISSION, AND GOALS AND OBJECTIVES. Vision. Mission. Goals and Objectives CONNECTING COMMUNITIES ACROSS THE ST.

Proposed Bridge Street East Bicycle Lanes Public Open House Thursday, April 27, 2017

Corporate. Report COUNCIL DATE: June 26, 2006 NO: C012 COUNCIL-IN-COMMITTEE. TO: Mayor & Council DATE: June 22, 2006

TOWN OF PORTLAND, CONNECTICUT COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Appendix C. Bicycle Route Signage

River Road - Proposed Implementation of Selected Road Safety Measures

Bicycling Routes on Provincial Roads Policy

Corporate. Report COUNCIL DATE: May 25, 1998 NO: R1500 REGULAR COUNCIL. TO: Mayor & Council DATE: April 27, 1998

The procedures to be followed in undertaking Non-Emergency work depend on the degree of traffic disruption caused by the work.

TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES

Borough of Danville, PA Traffic Calming Program Guidelines

Options for Permitting Street or Intersection Murals on Local Streets. Public Works and Infrastructure Committee

CITY OF OTTAWA ROADWAY MODIFICATION APPROVAL UNDER DELEGATED AUTHORITY

ALLEY 24 TRAFFIC STUDY

CITY MANUALS AND STANDARDS REVIEW

P.O. Box 1749 Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3A5 Canada Item No. 6 Halifax Regional Council April 11, 2017

Traffic Improvements for the Transit Oriented Development District (TODD) Meriden Public Library March 11, 2014

WELCOME Public Information Centre

2017 Temporary traffic control guidelines for pedestrians. v.2

TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION

Non-Motorized Transportation 7-1

Public Information Centre

GOVERNMENT OF SASKATCHEWAN SUBMISSION TO THE RAILWAY SAFETY ACT REVIEW PANEL

US Hwy. 64/264 Pedestrian Crossing at the Little Bridge Alternatives Analysis Public Meeting

City of Darlington Beautification Report

Johnwoods Street Closure Summary Response

County of Greenville South Carolina. Traffic Calming Program Neighborhood Traffic Education Program and Speed Hump Program

WHEREAS, the New Jersey Department of Transportation' s Complete Streets

Traffic Calming Policy

Harbord Street and Hoskin Avenue Bicycle Lane Upgrades

Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

PEDESTRIAN SAFETY IMPROVEMENT EVALUATION GUIDELINE FOR UNCONTROLLED CROSSINGS

CITY OF HAMILTON PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Transportation Planning and Parking Division

AMATS Complete Streets Policy

ADA TRANSITION PLAN 2013

o n - m o t o r i z e d transportation is an overlooked element that can greatly enhance the overall quality of life for the community s residents.

P.O. Box 1749 Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3A5 Canada Item No Halifax Regional Council December 12, 2017

5 REQUEST FOR GRADE-SEPARATED PEDESTRIAN UNDERPASS CROSSINGS OF LESLIE STREET AND ST. JOHN S SIDEROAD TOWN OF AURORA

83 AVENUE PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING

Crosswalk Policy Revisions & Pedestrian & Bicycle Connection Plans. Presentation to Sanibel City Council July 16, 2013

Traffic Calming Policy

Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan for Public Right-of-Way Improvements

Sharrows and Elephants and Bike Boxes!, s, Oh My!

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF BELLEVILLE BY-LAW NUMBER

Option W: N. Washington Street Project

Active Transportation Infrastructure Investment A Business Case

IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES

Pre-Construction Meeting

Pattullo Bridge Replacement Project Community Connections Phase 2 Consultation. Appendix 3: Open House Display Boards

TOWN OF PAYSON TRAFFIC CALMING MANUAL

Item No Halifax Regional Council January 16, 2018 January 30, 2018

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 21, 2017

Why invest in the 1 Street S.W. Corridor?

Downey Road. Transportation Improvement Study

Complete Streets. Designing Streets for Everyone. Sarnia

Chapter 315 TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. Section Manual and Specifications For Traffic Control Devices.

Pennsylvania Avenue (CR 484) Design Alternatives Study

CHAPTER 1 STANDARD PRACTICES

Traffic Safety Plan Second Avenue

Appendix A: Crosswalk Policy

Public Works and Infrastructure Committee. General Manager, Transportation Services

Omaha s Complete Streets Policy

Transcription:

F.4 REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL PRESENTED: SEPTEMBER 12, 2016 - REGULAR AFTERNOON MEETING REPORT: 16-85 FROM: ENGINEERING DIVISION FILE: 5460-13-20-005 SUBJECT: RAINBOW CROSSWALK AT GLOVER ROAD AND MAVIS AVENUE IN FORT LANGLEY RECOMMENDATION: That Council authorize staff to refer the concept of installing rainbow-coloured crosswalks at the intersection of Glover Road and Mavis Avenue in Fort Langley to the Business Improvement Association (BIA) and the Heritage Advisory Committee (HAC) for their input; and direct staff to include related costs in the 2017 Budget for Council s consideration and subsequent implementation. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: At its July 11, 2016 Regular Evening Meeting, Council referred a delegation requesting a rainbow coloured crosswalk at the intersection of Glover Road and Mavis Avenue in Fort Langley to staff for a report. The Township s Signed and Marked Crosswalks Policy refers to Transportation Association of Canada s (TAC) guidelines that require standardization and uniformity using solid white lines extending entirely across the pavement at a minimum width of 2.5 metres to define a crosswalk. A rainbow crosswalk is not specifically referenced in the TAC Guidelines; however, there are no prohibitions regarding such installations and Township s Policy provides flexibility for the Municipal Engineer to determine design based on applicable standards, as well as local considerations including determination of best public interest as articulated by Council. In this light, the Township has implemented variations in crosswalk markings in areas using textured surfaces, brick patterns, and different colours between two solid white lines. Crosswalk markings are not painted, due to issues with durability and safety related to lack of friction and slippery surface. Rather, spray-on or torched-on markings are used with coloured thermoplastic products which have the benefits of durability, reflectivity and a higher friction coefficient for increased traction. The Fort Langley Business Improvement Association (BIA) is typically consulted on beautification projects such as street furniture, streetlight standards and sidewalk patterns and colours. Downtown Fort Langley, including the intersection of Glover Road at Mavis Avenue, is within a Heritage Conservation Area and part of a streetscape program, which do not consider or address rainbow crosswalks. The Heritage Advisory Committee (HAC) is typically consulted on items that affect the aesthetics and heritage character of the community. Referrals are recommended to BIA and HAC. Road improvements are planned at the subject intersection. Accordingly, installation of permanent crosswalk markings, particularly having higher costs, should be deferred until after construction works have been completed and the pavement restored. The cost of installing a rainbow crosswalk at all four legs of the intersection is estimated at $50,000 compared to $5,000 for a typical intersection. There would also be similar ongoing maintenance costs every three to five years. Should Council wish to proceed with the installation, necessary funding would be included in the 2017 Budget. PURPOSE: To respond to Council s direction and provide Council with information regarding the potential installation of rainbow coloured crosswalks in Fort Langley.

RAINBOW CROSSWALK AT GLOVER AND MAVIS IN FORT LANGLEY Page 2... F.4 BACKGROUND/HISTORY: At its July 11, 2016 Regular Evening Meeting, Council passed the following resolution: That the request to have a rainbow crosswalk at the intersection of Glover Road and Mavis Avenue in Fort Langley be referred to staff for a report. DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS: As requested, staff is able to provide Council with the following information in order to ensure all implications are adequately considered by Council prior to implementation. The information below relates to applicable policies, legislative requirements, design guidelines, current Township practices, planned future intersection and road modifications, heritage considerations and financial implications, as discussed in more detail below. Applicable Policies: The Signed and Marked Crosswalks Policy (No. 05-101), approved by Council, defines the conditions under which the Township may provide crosswalks and the required type and standard. Section 3.2 of the Policy (Attachment A) states: All signed and marked crosswalks shall be painted or laid with thermos-plastic material and signed in accordance with the Transportation Association of Canada s (TAC) Pedestrian Crossing Control Manual, or as directed by the Municipal Engineer. The TAC Pedestrian Crossing Control Manual augments the Transportation Association of Canada Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) with respect to crosswalks and provides standards that promote uniformity. Both guidelines indicate that pavement markings must be similar for all categories of crosswalks, crosswalk lines must be normal solid white lines extending entirely across the pavement and the crosswalk must be a minimum of 2.5 metres wide. Solid white lines are typically used to define the crosswalk at intersections and with white zebra markings used at mid-block or school crossings. There are no specific references to rainbow coloured crosswalks in the TAC Guidelines, which form the basis of Township s Policy. Having said that, there are no prohibitions regarding such installations and Township s Policy provides flexibility for the Municipal Engineer to determine design based on applicable and relevant standards, as well as local considerations including determination of best public interest as articulated by Council. Legislative Framework: The BC Motor Vehicle Act defines a crosswalk as: (a) a portion of the roadway at an intersection or elsewhere distinctly indicated for pedestrian crossing by signs or by lines or other markings on the surface, or (b) the portion of a highway at an intersection that is included within the connection of the lateral lines of the sidewalks on the opposite sides of the highway, or within the extension of the lateral lines of the sidewalk on one side of the highway, measured from the curbs, or in the absence of curbs, from the edges of the roadway; Based on the BC Motor Vehicle Act, Township s Policy, the TAC MUTCD and Pedestrian Crossing Control Manual, at a minimum two solid while lines extending entirely across the pavement at a width of 2.5 metres must be provided to legally constitute a crosswalk. A rainbow crosswalk would not meet the TAC guidelines in terms of providing consistency at similar types of crosswalks. However, it is common practice in beautification areas or town centres to provide crosswalks that have a textured surface, brick pattern, or a different colour between the two solid white lines.

RAINBOW CROSSWALK AT GLOVER AND MAVIS IN FORT LANGLEY Page 3... F.4 Current Practice: The Township follows TAC MUTCD and Pedestrian Crossing Control Manual guidelines for the installation of road markings and signage for pedestrian crossings by using either solid white lines or Zebra Markings. The Township currently does not paint crosswalks due to safety and durability issues. Installing paint at intersections can create slippery conditions for pedestrians, cyclist, and vehicles creating a safety concern. In addition, painted crosswalks are not durable and have to be repainted repeatedly. Painted crosswalk lines would deteriorate significantly in a three to four month time period as compared to three to five years for thermoplastic line markings. Accordingly, the Township has, over the past several years, used a spray-on or torched-on white thermoplastic product which has benefits in terms of durability, reflectivity and a higher friction coefficient for more traction, particularly when wet. The Township has installed crosswalks that differ from the typical white line installation through the use of either textured or coloured pavement. Examples include the intersections of 200 Street at 40 Avenue, 41 Avenue, and 42 Avenue where the crosswalk has a grey wooden plank design between the two white lines. The Township has also used a street print product in areas such as Fraser Highway in Aldergrove and the existing crosswalks in Fort Langley. The crosswalks in Aldergrove were originally constructed using stamped and colored pavement. Over time, the markings faded and were replaced with a street print product which is torched onto the pavement. The product has proven to be durable with the appropriate reflectivity and increased friction coefficient. Community and Heritage Implications: Rainbow crosswalks have been installed in several municipalities across Canada including the Lower Mainland. Examples of British Columbia municipalities that have either installed or approved rainbow crosswalks include Vancouver, Victoria, Maple Ridge, New Westminster, Nanaimo, Kelowna, and Prince Rupert. Some of these installations are permanent while others were installed on a temporary basis for special events. An aspect to consider prior to installation is consultation with community groups and associations. Concerns have been raised in some municipalities with respect to the additional cost and resources allocated to the crosswalks and safety as it is inconsistent with a typical crosswalk. The installation of a non-standard crosswalk may also lead to requests for other specialized types of crosswalks throughout the Township. The Fort Langley Business Improvement Association (BIA) is typically consulted during the selection of items such as street furniture, streetlight colors and standards and sidewalk patterns and colours. It is recommended that the installation of a rainbow crosswalk at the intersection of Glover Road and Mavis Avenue be referred to the BIA for their input. The Fort Langley Community Plan designates part of the downtown Fort Langley, including the intersection of Glover Road at Mavis Avenue, as a Heritage Conservation Area (HCA). The HCA is meant to protect the character of downtown Fort Langley by encouraging new developments and alterations that complement and enhance building with heritage value and the heritage character of the area. In 2001, the Township also completed a Fort Langley Streetscape Program which includes the Glover Road at Mavis Avenue intersection. Neither the HCA nor the Streetscape program addresses or considers the installation of rainbow crosswalks. It is recommended that installation of a rainbow crosswalk at the intersection of Glover Road and Mavis Avenue be referred to Heritage Advisory Committee (HAC) for input.

RAINBOW CROSSWALK AT GLOVER AND MAVIS IN FORT LANGLEY Page 4... F.4 Future Road Conditions: The existing intersection of Glover Road and Mavis Avenue is controlled with a pedestrian traffic signal with pedestrian crossings on all four legs. Due to recent construction activity in the area, the existing pavement is in poor condition and is not suitable for the installation of permanent pavement markings with higher installation costs. In addition, the Township has been working with CN Rail and Transport Canada to modify and convert the intersection to a full traffic signal, which would have future construction impact at the intersection. It is therefore recommended that the installation of permanent crosswalk markings be deferred until after the road structure has been repaired and the full traffic signal installed. This work is currently anticipated to be completed in the summer of 2017. Financial Implications: As the intersection of Glover Road at Mavis Avenue has four pedestrian crossings, in order to provide consistency and minimize confusion for pedestrians, cyclists and motorists, all four legs should be marked in a similar manner. Other lower mainland municipalities have utilized colored thermoplastic materials torched onto the pavement for the installation of permanent rainbow crosswalk markings. The estimated cost for the installation of a rainbow crosswalk across one leg of the intersection is estimated $12,000 to $13,000. However, this would create inconsistency with the other three legs of the intersection. The cost of installing rainbow crosswalks on all four legs of the intersection is estimated at approximately $50,000. Alternatively, another location in Fort Langley, such as the midblock crossing of Glover Road near Mary Street could be considered as this would only require marking one crossing at an estimated cost of $12,000. A further consideration for a rainbow crosswalk would be the increased ongoing maintenance costs. The thermoplastic crosswalks at an intersection typically cost $5,000 to install and would have an ongoing maintenance cost of $5,000 every three to five years for replacement. A thermoplastic rainbow crosswalk would cost $50,000 to install and would have an ongoing maintenance cost of $50,000 every three to five years to replace. If Council were to endorse installation of a rainbow crosswalk, funding could be included in the 2017 Budget for consideration. Funding would also have to be included in future operating budgets for ongoing maintenance and replacement costs. Respectfully submitted, Paul Cordeiro MANAGER, TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING for ENGINEERING DIVISION ATTACHMENT A Signed and Marked Crosswalks Policy No. 05-101

F.4 COUNCIL POLICY Subject: Signed and Marked Crosswalks Policy No: Previous Policy No: Approved by Council: Revised by Council: Revised by Council: 05-101 05-705 1998-09-21 2002-09-09 2016-05-30 1. Purpose 1.1. To define conditions under which the Township may provide crosswalks. 2. Background 2.1. Township of Langley Highway and Traffic Bylaw No. 4758 (and amendments thereto), provides authority for the Municipal Engineer to place or erect applicable traffic control devices. 3. Policy 3.1. The Municipal Engineer may provide for the installation of a crosswalk where in their opinion, the crosswalk is warranted for the safety of pedestrians and: 3.1.1. The crossing shall be evaluated using the warrants and procedures found in the Transportation Association of Canada (TAC) Pedestrian Crossing Control Manual March 1998 edition. 3.1.2. The crossing is at an intersection where all approaches are controlled by stop signs; or 3.1.3. The crossing is at a signalized intersection; or 3.1.4. The crossing is at a location where a demonstrated need can be shown, vehicle and pedestrian volumes are high, a facility can be provided without compromising pedestrian safety and the location meets Township criteria for such a facility; or 3.1.5. The crossing is at a location that does not compromise traffic flow, operation or vehicular safety. 3.2. All signed and marked crosswalks shall be painted or laid with thermo-plastic material and signed in accordance with the Transportation Association of Canada s Pedestrian Crossing Control Manual, or as directed by the Municipal Engineer.