Regulatory Guidelines for Managing the Muskellunge Sport Fishery in Ontario

Similar documents
A New Ecological Framework for Recreational Fisheries Management in Ontario

Fisheries Management Zone 10:

FISH COMMUNITIES AND FISHERIES OF THE THOUSAND ISLANDS AND MIDDLE CORRIDOR

Kawartha Lakes Fisheries. Dan Taillon Peterborough District Mike Rawson Kawartha Lakes Fisheries Assessment Unit

Renseignements supplémentaires. Supplementary Information. Présentation du Ministère des Richesses naturelles de l Ontario

Fisheries Management Plan for Fisheries Management Zone 17: November Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Peterborough District

SUBJECT: Provision of Fish or Gametes from the Provincial Fish Culture Program

Building a science for landscape fisheries management

Characteristics of Ontario Muskellunge Fisheries Based on Volunteer Angler Diary Information. November 2004

The Role of the Recreational Angler in Fisheries Monitoring, Research and Management

Crawford Reservoir. FISH SURVEY AND MANAGEMENT INFORMATION Eric Gardunio, Fish Biologist Montrose Service Center

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric

Alberta Conservation Association 2013/14 Project Summary Report

Dauphin Lake Fishery. Status of Walleye Stocks and Conservation Measures

Fisheries Management Plan for Fisheries Management Zone 4 1. Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry

Staff, Organizations Directly Affected (including but not limited to):

Eastern New Brunswick Coastal and Inland Recreational Fisheries Advisory Committee

What was the historic coaster fishery like?

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

APPENDIX 2.1 Lake Sturgeon - Mitigation and Enhancement

Water Quality Guidelines for Total Gas Pressure: First Update

FISHERIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR DUFFINS CREEK AND CARRUTHERS CREEK JUNE, 2004

Implementing the New Fisheries Protection Provisions under the Fisheries Act

MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP DIVISION FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH. Horsefly River Angling Management Plan

Atlantic Highly Migratory Species; Atlantic Bluefin Tuna Fisheries. AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric

ATLANTIC SALMON NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR, SALMON FISHING AREAS 1-14B. The Fisheries. Newfoundland Region Stock Status Report D2-01

Rainy Lake Open-water Creel Survey:

FISH AND WILDLIFE SPECIAL PURPOSE ACCOUNT

Alberta Conservation Association 2011/12 Project Summary Report. Project Name: Walleye Stock Assessment Program 2011/12 Moose and Fawcett Lakes

ADDENDUM I TO AMENDMENT 3 OF THE INTERSTATE FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR WEAKFISH

Exploring the relationship between native smallmouth bass and invasive mussels in the Huron Erie Corridor

Cast Net Report. As required by Minnesota Statutes, section 97C.345, subdivision 3a, paragraph (c) 03/01/2018. Cast Net Report 1

Council CNL(16)31. Annual Progress Report on Actions Taken Under the Implementation Plan for the Calendar Year EU - Finland

Highlights of Native Fish Rehabilitation Activities in the Great Lakes. Presented By: Arunas Liskauskas, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources

PROCEDURE MANUAL of 6. Moose Harvest Management. This Procedure Replaces: None

NORTHWEST SCIENCE AND INFORMATION

Angling in Manitoba (2000)

Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife: Inland Fisheries - Hatchery Management

Charter Boat Fishing in Lake Michigan: 2017 Illinois Reported Harvest

P.O.Box 23 Sw an Reach 3903 Victoria Phone E m ail- bigpond.com

Susquehanna River Walleye Fishery

Maintenance of Ontario s Aquaculture Statistics Program: AQUASTATS. Final Report submitted to: Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE. Gamefish Assessment Report

Chapter 5: Survey Reports

10.3 Advice May 2014

Current projects for Fisheries Research Unit of Minnesota Department of Natural Resources

Fisheries Management Plan for Fisheries Management Zone 6. August Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Thunder Bay District

The Saint John River Muskellunge Tagging Project,

Summary of and Initial Response to public comments on MN Department of Natural Resources proposal to manage new waters for Muskellunge

Revisions to the National Standard 1 Guidelines:

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Fisheries Division, Lake Superior Area

An annual fisheries newsletter from Grand Rapids Fisheries: Spring 2018

December 18, Dear Sir/Madam,

ANGLER HARVEST SURVEY FRANCES LAKE Prepared by: Nathan Millar, Oliver Barker, and Lars Jessup

Fish Community. Fish Habitat, Streams and Rivers

Requested Changes for the Bluefin Tuna Catch and Release Fishery

Cariboo-Chilcotin (Region 5) Mule Deer: Frequently Asked Questions

Status of Northern Pike and Yellow Perch at Goosegrass Lake, Alberta, 2006

Angling in Manitoba Survey of Recreational Angling

Framework Management in British Columbia

Charter Boat Fishing in Lake Michigan: 2015 Illinois Reported Harvest

2012 Maryland FMP Report (July 2013) Section 15. Red Drum (Sciaenops ocellatus)

Risk Assessments in the Pacific Fisheries for BC & Yukon

Chagrin River TMDL Appendices. Appendix F

Current Status and Management Recommendations for the Fishery in the Cloverleaf Chain of Lakes

Council CNL(11)35. Annual Report on Actions Taken Under Implementation Plans. EU - France

Fisheries and Lake Management Planning. CAP Mtg Nov21,2012 Brett Tregunno Aquatic Biologist, Kawartha Conservation

Aerated Lakes Angler Survey: Swan and Spring Lakes, Alberta, 2015

ASMFC Stock Assessment Overview: Red Drum

Draft Addendum V For Board Review. Coastal Sharks Management Board August 8, 2018

Fall Walleye Index Netting at Battle Lake, Alberta, 2012

Meeting in Support of Species at Risk Act Listing Process for Lower Fraser River and Upper Fraser River White Sturgeon

ALBERTA FISH & GAME ASSOCIATION 2015 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING PASSED RESOLUTIONS FEBRUARY 21, 2015

Maintaining biodiversity in mixed-stock salmon fisheries in the Skeena watershed

MIDDLE FORK RESERVOIR Wayne County 2004 Fish Management Report. Christopher C. Long Assistant Fisheries Biologist

A FISHING BAN ON GRENADIER POND

Winnipeg. Urban Sport Fishing Stakeholders Report

The Alaska Department of Fish and Game administers all programs and activities free from discrimination on the basis of sex, color, race, religion,

"Recommended Improvements for the Next Pacific Salmon Treaty"

OKANAGAN LAKE FISH MANAGEMENT PLAN SUMMARY

Final Draft Integrated Fishery Management Plan. Summary

UNNAMED LAKE (KEITH LAKE - Richardson Backcountry) FALL WALLEYE INDEX NETTING SURVEY, Fisheries Management Waterways-Lac La Biche Area

Potomac River Muskellunge

Wild Virginia and Heartwood first raised this issue at the May 19, 2014 public meeting.

ICES Advice on fishing opportunities, catch, and effort Celtic Seas and Greater North Sea ecoregions Published 30 June 2016

Public Input to St. Lawrence River Fisheries Community Objectives

Attachment 2 PETITIONERS

First Nations Fish Habitat Program Discussion Workbook

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric

MANAGEMENT ESTABLISHING JURISDICTION LEGAL BASIS DEFINING LOGICAL APPROACHES

2011 Status of Major Stocks. Lake Erie Management Unit March 2012

2016 Volunteer Program Annual Report

Management of Canada Geese

PRESENTATION TO THE BRITISH COLUMBIA LEGISALTIVE STANDING COMMITTEE ON FINANCE September 26, 2013

Modifications to Gulf Reef Fish and South Atlantic Snapper Grouper Fishery Management Plans

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife Section of Fisheries. Stream Survey Report. Cold Spring Creek.

1) Increase the deer population to 475,000 (mule, 150,000;

Muskie Regulation Focus Group Meeting. Chris Penne Utah Division of Wildlife Resources

Transcription:

Regulatory Guidelines for Managing the Muskellunge Sport Fishery in Ontario Fisheries Section Fish and Wildlife Branch Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources June 2003 Updated August 2005

Regulatory Guidelines for Managing the Muskellunge Sport Fishery in Ontario NOTE: Since the approval of this document in 2003, MNR has launched the New Ecological Framework for Recreational Fisheries Management. A key component of this new framework is the establishment of Fisheries Management Zones (FMZs) which will replace fishing divisions as the unit for managing recreational fisheries (Appendix I). The recommendations for the application of the regulatory options given herein have been updated to be consistent with the new FMZs. These guidelines describe the preferred regulatory options for the management of the muskellunge sport fishery in Ontario. The options are based on current scientific knowledge on the effectiveness of various regulations for managing muskellunge. They are a combination of management strategies designed to maximize angling opportunities while protecting muskellunge populations from over-exploitation. In order to provide consistency to the management of muskellunge in Ontario, the regulatory guidelines contained herein are the only options to be used in the development of any new regulations for muskellunge. Where the existing regulations do not conform to the approach in this report, they should be analyzed using the criteria set out in the provincial Approvals in Principle process. Introduction Muskellunge (Esox masquinongy) are native only to North America and are distributed across the northeastern portion of the continent. In Ontario, there are at least 302 lakes and 105 streams and rivers, which support populations of muskellunge (OMNR 1987, Kerr 2001). Their distribution occurs in the southcentral and northwestern parts of the province. All of Ontario's muskellunge fisheries are based on naturally reproducing stocks. The only muskellunge stocking program currently underway involves small plantings of fish in the Spanish River area of the North Channel, Lake Huron, which are intended to restore a degraded population. There is also interest in the rehabilitation of Lake Simcoe's muskellunge population. Muskellunge are a highly valued fish species. Ontario provides a wide diversity of angling opportunities ranging from those who merely wish to catch a fish to other anglers who may desire the opportunity to catch a trophy or even a world record. A unique aspect of muskellunge fisheries is that most anglers practice a catch-and-release ethic with very little post-release mortality. It is estimated that less than 10% of the muskellunge angled from Ontario waters are actually harvested. This fact must be considered when regulatory options are being reviewed. In Ontario, muskellunge have traditionally been managed on a regulatory basis by the use of closed seasons, catch and possession limits, size limit regulations and fish sanctuaries (see review by Kerr 1998). There have been two provincial reviews (1985 and 1999) of muskellunge regulations in the past. Over the past decade there has been a tendency for regulations to become increasingly complex and poorly rationalized. These guidelines have been prepared to 2

identify the most effective regulatory options to ensure sustainability and provide trophy fishing opportunities, based on existing science and current knowledge, and to simplify regulations, which are ultimately selected. Open/Closed Seasons Closed seasons have traditionally been used to protect muskellunge during their vulnerable reproductive period as they move to spawning sites, spawn, and disperse to summer feeding areas. Muskellunge are spring spawners at water temperatures between 9.4 and 15.0ºC (Kerr and Grant 2000). Muskellunge generally spawn later in the spring than northern pike (Esox lucius). There were ten different muskellunge seasons in Ontario in 2001(Table 1). Traditionally, season opening dates occurred sometime in June and closing dates have ranged from October 15 to December 15. Table 1. Open seasons for muskellunge in Ontario (2001) (Recreational Fishing Regulations Summary, 2001). Open Season Division(s) June 2 (1 st Saturday) - November 15 6 June 2 (1 st Saturday) - November 30 13, 15, Bayfield and Maitland Rivers (Division 4) June 2 (1 st Saturday) - December 15 1, 3, 4, 5, 7 June 3 - November 30 Lake Nosbonsing (Division 15) June 15 (Friday before 3 rd Saturday) - November 30 June 16 (3 rd Saturday) - October 15 27 June 16 (3 rd Saturday) - November 30 2, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12A, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 22, 22A, 23, 26, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, Pickerel River (Division 15) June 16 (3 rd Saturday) - November 30 (during daylight hours only) 12 Eagle Lake (Division 22) June 16 (3 rd Saturday) - December 31 French River (Division 15) Open all year (closed on December 24) 14, 19, 24, 25, 33, 34 While season opening dates may reflect differences in climate to some degree, season closing dates are poorly rationalized. Angling opportunities can be increased by extending the open season without compromising resource sustainability. Anglers fishing late in the season are normally dedicated musky anglers that practice a catch-and-release ethic. Due to concerns 3

regarding mortality of released fish caught while ice fishing, a mid-december closing is believed to be appropriate across the province. Recommended Season Dates: It is recommended that muskellunge seasons open on either the 1 st Saturday in June or the 3 rd Saturday in June, depending on latitude and local spawning conditions. Colder waters of the Great Lakes and some connecting waters (St. Marys River, Niagara River, Ottawa River and St. Lawrence River) should not open until the 3 rd Saturday in June. The Lake Simcoe muskellunge fishery is currently closed all year for stock rehabilitation efforts and should remain closed pending further review. All muskellunge seasons should remain open until December 15. In FMZs where muskellunge are not present there should be no open season. The following muskellunge seasons are recommended based on the Fisheries Management Zones (FMZs): Table: 2. Recommended muskellunge seasons for Ontario Season FMZ 1 st Saturday in June - December 15 15,16,17,18,19 3 rd Saturday in June - December 15 2,4,5,7,9,10,11,12,13,14, 20 No Open Season 1,3,6,8 Catch and Possession Limits Historically, the daily catch limit for muskellunge was two fish. The catch limit was reduced to one (1) fish with a maximum of two (2) fish in possession based on recommendations from the 1985 regulatory review. There is currently a catch and possession limit of zero (0) for anglers holding a conservation licence, although they are legally allowed to angle for muskellunge, but they must immediately release any fish that they catch. Most species of fish in Ontario have the same catch and possession limits. This regulation has caused considerable confusion for anglers fishing for other species. There were three different catch and possession limit regulations in Ontario in 2001 (Table 3). Table 3. Catch and possession limits for muskellunge in Ontario (2001). 4

Catch Limit by Licence Type Possession Limit by Licence Type Division(s) Sport Conservation Sport Conservation 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 22A, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 31, 32, 33, 34 1 0 2 0 12, 12A 1 0 1 0 30 0 0 0 0 In some instances, including rehabilitation of degraded stocks and introductions, catch-andrelease only regulations are recognized as being appropriate. For example, Lac Seul (Division 30) is presently identified as a catch-and-release fishery only with a catch and possession limit of zero (0) for muskellunge, regardless of licence type. The only other difference exists on the Ottawa River (Division 12) and Lake St. Francis (Division 12A). In order to be harmonized with fisheries regulations for the Province of Quebec, these two border waters have a catch and possession limit of only one (1) fish. Recommended Catch and Possession Limits: It is recommended that catch and possession limits for muskellunge be standardized at one (1) fish for holders or a sportfishing licence and zero (0) fish for holders of a conservation licence. Additional catch-and-release-only areas will be allowed by exception, similar to Lac Seul (in FMZ 4). Size Limit Regulations Minimum size limits have traditionally been used to manage Ontario muskellunge. A minimum size limit is the length, which a fish must attain before it can legally be caught and retained. Muskellunge populations have been noted to respond favourably to an increase in minimum size limits in Lake St. Clair, Ontario (MacLennan 1996), Lake of the Woods, Ontario (Mosindy 1996) and Bone Lake, Wisconsin (Cornelius and Margenau 1999). From 1949 to the 1980s, the minimum size limit for muskellunge ranged from 28-30 inches (71.1-76.2 cm). A provincial review of size limits was conducted in 1985 (OMNR 1985) and three new size limits were implemented in 1988. Since 1990 several additional minimum size limit regulations have come into effect. The proliferation of different minimum size limit regulations (see Table 4) led to a provincial review in 1999 (OMNR et al. 1999). This review was designed to provide a diversity of angling opportunities for muskellunge in the province, to 5

ensure that muskellunge regulations could be rationalized and meet sustainability objectives, and to establish benchmark values to simplify the regulations. Table 4. Minimum size limit regulations for muskellunge in Ontario (2001). Size Limit Regulation Division(s) 34" (86 cm) total length 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 20, 21, 23, 24, 27, 28, 31, 32, 33, 34 36 (91 cm) total length 10,13,14,15, 18, 19, 25,26,29 40" (102 cm) total length 7 (6 waters), 8, 16, 17, 22 41" (104 cm) fork length Ottawa River (Division 12) 42" (106.7 cm) total length 1 (Lake St. Clair) 44" (111.8 cm) total length 2, St. Lawrence River (Division 11), Lake St. Francis (Division 12A) 48" (122 cm) total length 11, French River (Division 15) 52" (132 cm) total length Division 22 (10 lakes) Total catch-and-release Lac Seul (Division 30) To ensure resource sustainability, all muskellunge should be protected until they have had the opportunity to spawn at least twice (i.e., have reached 7 years of age). This corresponds to a minimum size limit of 36" (91.4 cm). Based on the ultimate growth potential of muskellunge in a particular waterbody (see Casselman et al. 1999), minimum size limits can be used to provide various qualities of fisheries. Benchmark values for these types of fisheries were established at 36 (91.4 cm) 40" (101.6 cm), 44" (111.8 cm), 48" (121.9 cm) and 54" (137.2 cm). The most appropriate size limit must be based on the growth potential of fish from that waterbody. The first of these new regulations came into effect in 2001 and outstanding revisions, to ensure consistency with this strategy, are expected in the future. Recommended Size Limits: Minimum size limits will continue to be used to manage muskellunge populations in Ontario. A minimum size limit of 36 inches will be implemented as the provincial standard. Size limit regulations larger than the provincial standard will be considered for specific water bodies but must conform to one of the five benchmark values (40, 44, 48, and 54 inches) and be supported by the appropriate biological information. Water bodies that do not conform to the above should be changed to match one of the five benchmark values following the Casselman et al. (1999) criteria. 6

All muskellunge size limits are to be measured in total length. Sanctuaries Fish sanctuaries are designated areas where all fishing is prohibited. Sanctuaries can be seasonal in duration or extend for the entire year. Fish sanctuaries have not been used extensively for muskellunge in Ontario. Two examples of muskellunge sanctuaries are Nogies Creek (all year sanctuary, primarily for research purposes) and the area south of the Lake Scugog causeway (April - mid May). These sanctuaries are designed to protect sensitive muskellunge spawning and nursery areas. Stronks (1996) concluded that the seasonal sanctuary and closed season were effective in protecting muskellunge during their spawning period in Osler Marsh, Lake Scugog, Ontario. Recommended Use of Sanctuaries: Fish sanctuaries are a legitimate management option for muskellunge but should be used only in cases where it is necessary to take action to ensure the sustainability of the local muskellunge resource. Since fish sanctuaries prohibit all fishing activity, the designation of sanctuary status and exclusion of fishing opportunities must be well rationalized and based on concerns regarding resource sustainability. Sanctuaries can be year-round to protect vulnerable populations or a specific area, or could be used to extend the existing closed season to protect pre and post-spawning populations. All requests for sanctuaries should be reviewed with the Approvals in Principle committee. All fish sanctuaries should be reviewed on an ongoing basis to ensure that they are meeting fisheries objectives and are still required. Special Regulations A number of special regulations have been used in other jurisdictions with varying degrees of success. These include bait and gear restrictions, tags, daylight-only angling, etc. There has been little evaluation of the effectiveness of these regulations. Recommendation for Special Regulations: The use of special regulations will be discouraged except where they are implemented on an experimental basis with plans for a thorough assessment of their relative effectiveness and a reasonable expectation for ensuring compliance so that the integrity of the experimental project is maintained. 7

References and Relevant Literature American Fisheries Society. 1997. A synopsis of angling regulations for esocids in North America. Technical Report Prepared by the Esocid Technical Committee. Bethesda, Maryland. 64 p. Casselman, J. M., C. R. Robinson and E. J. Crossman. 1999. Growth and ultimate length of muskellunge from Ontario waterbodies. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 19: 271-290. Christie, W. J. 1978. A study of freshwater fishery regulation based on the North American experience. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome Italy. 46 p. Cornelius, R. R. and T. L. Margenau. 1999. Effects of length limits in muskellunge in Bone Lake, Wisconsin. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 19: 300-308. Kerr, S. J. 1998. Muskellunge regulations in Ontario: The last fifty (1949-1998) years. Fisheries Section, Fish and Wildlife Branch. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. Peterborough, Ontario. 34 p. Kerr, S. J. 2001. Atlas of muskellunge streams and rivers in Ontario. Fisheries Section, Fish and Wildlife Branch. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. Peterborough, Ontario. 16 p. Kerr, S. J. and R. E. Grant. 2000. Ecological impacts of fish introductions: Evaluating the risk. Fisheries Section, Fish and Wildlife Branch. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. Peterborough, Ontario. 473 p. MacLennan, D. 1996. Changes in the muskellunge fishery and population of Lake St. Clair after an increase in the minimum size limit. p. 19-22 In S. J. Kerr and C. H. Olver [eds.] Managing Muskies in the 90s Workshop Proceedings. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. Kemptville, Ontario. 169 p. Mosindy, T. 1996. Recent trends in the Lake of the Woods muskellunge fishery. p. 105-113 In S. J. Kerr and C. H. Olver [eds.]. Managing Muskies in the 90s Workshop Proceedings. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. Kemptville, Ontario. 169 p. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. 1985. Report of the committee to review provincial muskellunge angling regulations. Report prepared for the Fisheries Policy Committee. Toronto, Ontario. 20 p. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. 1987. Atlas of muskellunge lakes in Ontario. Fisheries Branch. Toronto, Ontario. 34 p. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters, Muskies Canada and Northern Ontario Tourist Outfitters. 1999. Size limit regulations for Ontario muskellunge: A new approach. Peterborough, Ontario. 12 p. + appendices. 8

Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. 2001. 2001 Recreational Fishing Regulations Summary, 96 p. Stronks, T. R. 1996. Seasonal movements of muskellunge in Lake Scugog, Ontario. p. 47-53 In S. J. Kerr and C. H. Olver [eds.] Managing Muskies in the 90s Workshop Proceedings. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. Kemptville, Ontario. 169 p. 1 2 4 3 5 6 9 7 8 10 11 12 10 19 14 13 16 15 17 18 20 19 Appendix I New Fisheries Management Zones for Ontario s Sport Fisheries 9