UK rated gliding competition scoring explained

Similar documents
PROPOSAL TO IGC PLENARY 2017 Year 1. From USA. PROPOSAL to change the calculation of speed points and distance points.

2013 CIVL PLENARY ANNEX 24B SOFTWARE PROPOSALS

Basics of Speed to Fly for Paragliding Pilots

Glide Calculator SGS (e-version Jan 2007)

THE USGA HANDICAP SYSTEM. Reference Guide

English Translation/Interpretation for Class F3B-RES thermal-gliders (Rudder, Elevator, spoilers)

January 2011 Condor Corner Frank Paynter

Downsizing Intelligently: Choosing the Best Canopy Size. By Scott Miller. "What size canopy should I buy?"

Analyses of the Scoring of Writing Essays For the Pennsylvania System of Student Assessment

WOMEN S GOLF ASSOCIATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA

Pokémon Organized Play Tournament Operation Procedures

TIME-ON-TIME SCORING

LEVEL 1 FUNCTIONAL SKILLS MATHEMATICS 09865

RACE MANAGEMENT POLICY GUIDELINES FOR THE FINN CLASS MAJOR CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018.

British Gliding Association Cross Crediting Air Cadets Solo Standard to BGA Equivalence. Notes for BGA instructors. Introduction

Landing Setup Approach

Handicap Differential = (Adjusted Gross Score - USGA Course Rating) x 113 / USGA Slope Rating

Suburban Friendship League 2416 Rosedown Drive Reston, VA November 1, 2018

PRE-TEST Module 2 The Principles of Flight Units /60 points

Takeoff Performance. A 1 C change in temperature from ISA will increase or decrease the takeoff ground roll by 10%.

Types of Activity. Team & Individual Activities

Race Management Policies for World Sailing Events Fleet Racing Updated for Oceania & Australian Laser Regattas

From Bombe stops to Enigma keys

THE MAGIC MILE WILL HELP DETERMINE:

a fraction rock star in no time! This is a free calculator for adding, subtracting, multiplying, and dividing two fractions and/or mixed numbers.

Tournament Operation Procedures

Yachting Western Australia (Inc) Cruising & Power Yacht Committee

A Simple Horizontal Velocity Model of a Rising Thermal Instability in the Atmospheric Boundary Layer

Orienteering Competitions within SEOA (December 2017)

A REVIEW OF AGE ADJUSTMENT FOR MASTERS SWIMMERS

Gerald D. Anderson. Education Technical Specialist

SINGLES COMPETITIONS PLAYED FROM MULTIPLE TEES & MIXED- GENDER SINGLES COMPETITIONS: Operational Guidance for Clubs

RACING RULES / RACE OFFICIALS

Vorgee Endurance 1000

ADVISORY CIRCULAR AC 2-10

The key principle behind this system is as simple as it is brilliant find horses that are under-bet by the market, and then bet on them ourselves.

Correction to Is OBP really worth three times as much as SLG?

WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM COMPETITION ANALYSIS AT THE 1999 PAN PACIFIC SWIMMING CHAMPIONSHIPS?

COMPETITION DRAWS. Copyright reserved W A Bleechmore 14 Havilah Tce MUDGEE NSW April 1999

1. OVERVIEW OF METHOD

The World Pilot Ranking System (WPRS), for all Hanggliding and Paragliding disciplines.

Why We Should Use the Bullpen Differently

QUESTIONS and ANSWERS WHY TEST KONGSBERGS

It s conventional sabermetric wisdom that players

OFFICIAL TRAINING GUIDE

Football is one of the biggest betting scenes in the world. This guide will teach you the basics of betting on football.

ORGANISING TRAINING SESSIONS

At each type of conflict location, the risk is affected by certain parameters:

DRAFT RULE TEXT version 4 30 Dec 2018

Chapter 1: Incredible speed races

Questions & Answers About the Operate within Operate within IROLs Standard

Compiling your own betting tissues

RULES OF LEAGUE AND CUP COMPETITIONS

Shedding Light on Motion Episode 4: Graphing Motion

At the anual OLC convention in Gersfeld/Rhön, John Williams (UK) was honored with the 2007 Flight of the Year prize.

Make The Most Of Your Winners: Five Approaches To Staking

March Madness Basketball Tournament

Dick Bowdler Acoustic Consultant

Internet Technology Fundamentals. To use a passing score at the percentiles listed below:

Lesson: Pitch Trim. Materials / Equipment Publications o Flight Training Manual for Gliders (Holtz) Lesson 4.4 Using the Trim Control.

Volleyball Tryout Games & Drills

2018 TALES RULES FORMULATED BY THE GREATER DETROIT SOARING AND HIKING SOCIETY

Get set for the Booker HDT Comp Week 23 rd -31 st August. See reminder of how it works on Page 4

Stock Judging. Regional through to National level

FAI SPORTING CODE Section 3 Gliding Annex D Rules for the Official IGC Ranking List Edition Effective 1 st October Ver. 1.

STANDARD SCORES AND THE NORMAL DISTRIBUTION

The Effect of Drunk Driving Script Madeline McNamara Edgar Snyder Words to be Heard

Using Poisson Distribution to predict a Soccer Betting Winner

Ultrasound Dose Calculations

propose creative solutions and constitute good presentations T E A M S

By Jason Fitzgerald

!""#$%!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! "#$%!&'()*!$%!*(%+!,-!.-'/!()/!.'$*%!%,0($1#,!()/!%2--,#3!!4//!(!%2(''!(2-5),!-.!5&! *'*6(,-0!.-0!'-)1!'*6*'!.'$1#,%3!!!!!!!!

Civil Air Patrol Auxiliary of the United States Air Force

A New Chart for Pitchers and My Top 10 Pitching Thoughts Cindy Bristow - Softball Excellence

Modern volleyball aspects

Student Pilot Written Presolo Test for Chicago Glider Club September 1, 2012

CURTIN STADIUM NETBALL 5 s RULES & REGULATIONS

March Madness Basketball Tournament

EX0-008 exin. Number: EX0-008 Passing Score: 800 Time Limit: 120 min.

Developing a Javelin Run-Up

2011 WOMEN S 6 NATIONS

Aerodyne Flight Recommendations

Airplane Flying Handbook. Figure 6-4. Rectangular course.

Riverland Hockey Association BY-LAWS UPDATED JUNE 2011

RULES FOR SAILPLANE GRAND PRIX

Descent Planning with a Mechanical E6-B Flight Computer

The MACC Handicap System

APPE Intercollegiate Ethics Bowl (IEB) Regional Rules

Llandudno & District Table Tennis League Regulations

AEROSPACE MICRO-LESSON

States of Matter. The Behavior of Gases

2018 GOLF AUSTRALIA ORDER OF MERIT: MEN (Frequently Asked Questions) Version 17/10/2017

Advance British Club Challenge Rules

FAI Sporting Code. Section 3 Gliding Annex D. Rules for the Official IGC Ranking List Edition

International Radio Sailing Association

CIVA Glider Aerobatics Committee Report 2016 Agenda Item 10.4

The new Handicap Distance Tasks

The I-35 CHALLENGE. Goal: To run Kansas City on Saturday and Des Moines on Sunday

Exemplar for Internal Achievement Standard Physical Education Level 1

Geraldton Hockey Association [Inc.] 2017 BY-LAWS

Transcription:

UK rated gliding competition scoring explained Introduction The scoring system used in rated gliding competitions is necessarily* complicated and quite difficult for the average glider pilot to fully understand. To do so calls for close study of the mathematical scoring formulae set out in the rulebook and, of course, many of us don t find this easy. This paper attempts to demystify the scoring system by explaining it in plain English. *See A bit more detail below Task types From the point of view of the scoring formulae, it is necessary to consider only two task types: Fixed Course Task (FCT) Assigned Area Task (AAT) This is because Distance Handicapped Tasks (DHTs) in rated competitions are treated as a special kind of FCT and while the scoring process is slightly different (DHTs deal with the handicap issue by having the gliders fly different distances in the first place, so they are actually scored as unhandicapped), the formulae used are the same for both. For that reason, in this paper, the term FCT can be taken to include DHT. On the other hand, AATs do have some significant differences that need to be explained. The basic 1,000-point scoring system First, let s look at the basic features of the scoring system common to all task types: The most any competitor can score on any day is known as the Day Points. The maximum Day Points is 1,000. To keep points scores comparable from day to day and from contest to contest, factors are used in the calculation of Day Points to reduce the points available on days when tasks are short, speeds very high, or not enough gliders go far enough (see Devaluation later for a fuller explanation). First, taking account of any devaluation required for the reasons mentioned above, the number of Day Points is decided. Next, Day Points are split into Day Speed Points and Day Distance Points. These are the maximum that any competitor can score for speed and distance respectively. Day Speed Points are decided first. The maximum is two-thirds of the Day Points. That happens when everyone who launched finishes and does so more than two-thirds as fast as the fastest. The Day Speed Points reduce linearly as the proportion of sufficiently fast finishers reduces and is zero when there are no finishers. Day Distance Points are whatever is left after the Day Speed Points are subtracted from the Day Points. Distance scores are based on distances flown after adjustment for wind and glider Speed Index. See Handicapping and Windicapping below for more information on this.

Differences between FCTs and AATs The difference between FCT and AAT scoring comes in the calculation of the points awarded to individual competitors (Glider Speed Points and Glider Distance Points). These are calculated slightly differently for the different task types, but before we look at that we need to know about a scoring parameter unique to AATs; Minimum Time: AAT Minimum Time Every AAT has a Minimum Time (until recently known as Designated Time). It has only two functions in scoring: 1. Its principal use is in calculating your speed... but only if you finish early (ie in less than the Minimum Time). Your speed is calculated by dividing your distance by your time, but in an AAT your time cannot be less than the Minimum Time, so early finishers are penalised by being credited with a speed slower than they actually achieved. 2. It is also used as the time devaluation factor for AATs. (See Time Devaluation below) Calculation of Glider Speed Points To get any speed points you have to cross the finish line having achieved a speed greater than twothirds of the fastest finisher s speed. The number of Speed Points that you get starts at a very small amount when your speed is only just over two-thirds of the fastest and rises to the maximum when your speed is (or is equal to) the fastest. In an AAT however, as explained above, if you finish before the Minimum Time has elapsed the speed used in the calculation of your speed points will be lower than your actual speed. Calculation of Glider Distance Points Non-Finishers In both FCTs and AATs, non-finishers are treated in the same way. They all get a proportion of the Day Distance Points according to the ratio of their distance to the greatest distance. Note that, in an AAT, since everyone flies a different course, the greatest distance could be done by a non-finisher. This pilot would receive maximum distance points but, of course, no speed points. Finishers In FCTs all finishers get maximum distance points. In AATs, only those finishers who go further than two-thirds of the greatest distance get maximum distance points. Other AAT finishers get a proportion of Day Distance Points equal to the ratio of their distance to two-thirds of the greatest distance.

A bit more detail Devaluation From a sporting point of view, it is desirable that performances of similar merit should produce similar scores. This is especially true when, as in rated gliding competitions, the scores are later used in pilot ranking systems to determine priority of entry to other competitions. Accepting the above as a principle, it is necessary to have mechanisms in the scoring system to adjust the total points awarded from day to day to reflect the value of the day. Generally, the value of the day can be thought of as a combination of how hard the task was and how well the day s performances arose as a result of piloting and decision-making skills, as opposed to blind luck. Very short tasks and tasks completed very quickly will be of lesser value and, when a day ends with a few good performances when most pilots struggled, luck is assumed to have played a large part, so these mechanisms tend to look at those things. There are three such mechanisms in the scoring system, each of which produces a potential Day Points result. The smallest number of Day Points arising from any of the three is the one that is chosen. Day Factor and Qualifying Distance Y The first such mechanism simply multiplies the nominal 1,000 points by a Day Factor, which is always less than or equal to 1. The Day Factor is determined by the proportion of pilots in the competition (whether they launched that day or not) who make it past the Qualifying Distance Y. If 80% or more make it past Y the Day Factor will be 1 and so it will be a 1,000-point day, provided neither of the other two devaluation mechanisms produces a smaller number. As the proportion of pilots who pass Y reduces from 80%, the Day Factor reduces in proportion, so if the percentage past Y halves, for instance, the Day factor also halves. At 40% past Y, then, the day factor is 0.5 so, if not further devalued by either of the other two mechanisms, the Day Points will be 500. The value of Y itself depends on competition class and task type and is subject to minima and maxima, but is always a sizeable portion (around 40% to 50%) of the achievable distance. There is a table in the rulebook (appendix 7.2.1) that sets out how Y is determined. Distance devaluation The second devaluation mechanism looks at achieved distances*. If less than a set amount (250km for a regular Nationals or 200km for a Regionals or Junior Nationals) the formula, which also takes the Day Factor into account, will produce a lower number of Day Points than just the Day Factor on its own and may be the one that decides the Day Points. *For FCTs the winner s marking distance is used. For AATs it is the greatest marking distance flown by any competitor (who, in an AAT, may not be the winner). Time devaluation The third devaluation mechanism looks at task times*. If shorter than a set time (3 hours for a Regular Nationals or 2.5 hours for a Regionals or Junior Nationals) the formula, which also takes the Day Factor into account, will produce a lower number of Day Points than just the Day Factor on its own and may be the one that decides the Day Points. * For FCTs, the winner s time is used. For AATs it is the Minimum Time.

Task minima Each type of rated competition is subject to a task minimum. For FCTs it is the published task distance. For AATs, it is the published Minimum Time. Since these are set by the organiser, it is unlikely that a task would be set with less than the minimum distance or time, but if that were to happen through an error, the day would be forfeit by having the Day Points set to Zero by the scoring system. The minima are published in appendix 7.2.2 of the rulebook. Handicapping Handicapping is the adjustment of scores according to the published Speed Indices (often just called handicaps ) of the competing gliders so as to eliminate glider performance as a factor in deciding the outcome of the competition. It is used only in Regionals and in Club Class, Junior and 20m Multi- Seat Nationals. In the scoring system, handicapping is implemented by dividing the actual distance flown by a glider by its Speed Index (expressed as a percentage) to produce a Marking Distance, which may be greater or less than the actual distance flown depending on whether the Speed Index of the glider is less than or greater than 100%. Windicapping Windicapping is the adjustment of distance scoring to take account of the effect of the wind. As an illustration, imagine two pilots competing on a windy day. One achieves 50km directly into the strong wind to the first turning point and lands out. The other makes it round the first turning point and then flies a further 50km more or less downwind before landing out near the second turning point. The second has flown twice as far as the first. Does that mean he/she should receive twice as many distance points? No. the struggle to the first turning point must surely be worth more than the downwind-dash to the second. Windicapping takes care of that. It is implemented by adjusting the glider speed index on a leg by leg basis, taking into account the strength of headwind or tailwind on each leg in turn, calculating separate marking distances for each leg, then adding the leg marking distances to produce a total marking distance. It is used in all rated competitions. Note that although Nationals are unhandicapped, the application of windicapping is still done by adjusting speed indices, it s just that gliders in an unhandicapped competition are given the same nominal 100% speed index. The wind speed and direction used in the calculation is determined by examination of flight traces to give a Contest Wind which is used in scoring all flights that day. In the large span and flapped Nationals (Open, 18m 15m and 20m Multi-seat) the Contest Wind is reduced by a factor which is intended to recognise the lesser impact of wind on the higher-performance gliders. The factors are published in appendix 7.2.2 of the rulebook. Note that Contest Wind (after any adjustment) is limited to a maximum of 30 knots, even if the actual wind was higher. Note also that, in DHTs, handicapping and windicapping is not done in the scoring, but is taken account of in setting the barrel-sizes. The windicapping element uses a forecast contest wind instead of an actual contest wind extracted from flight traces.

Some points to note You don t get landed out at the end of Minimum Time in an AAT Contrary to a common misunderstanding, Minimum Time has no effect at all on your distance score. In other words, any distance you do after it has expired still counts. You definitely don't get landed out at the end of Minimum Time. Finishing late in an AAT is OK A late finish in an AAT implies a low speed or a large distance, or both. If others have done better, a low speed could certainly mean fewer (or perhaps no) speed points, but there is no other way in which finishing late can reduce your score. The further you go the better your chance of gaining maximum distance points and if you can increase your distance while preserving (or even improving) your speed, you will benefit. Whatever happens, don t miss out on points unnecessarily for fear of a late finish. Speed isn t everything in an AAT In an FCT, the fastest finisher is always the winner (disregarding penalties, of course), but this may not be the case in an AAT, if the pilot failed to go far enough. Points spread is what counts While a 1,000-point day usually means a fun day for most pilots and a seriously devalued day can mean disappointing scores for those who did well, a day doesn t have to be a Thousand Pointer to be a good contest day. If everyone is bunched together at the top of the points, it means the day hasn t made a lot of difference to the overall score for the competition. On the other hand, even a day with less than 1,000 points where there is a large points spread will have a big influence on final placings. Pilots shouldn t be overly concerned when the day, perhaps unexpectedly, produces fewer than 1,000 points, but should look at the points spread that results. If you are one of a handful of finishers on a low-points day, but you are disappointed with your low points score, look again, it could still mean as big a difference between you and your rival as you achieved in yesterday s boomer. IGC rules for international competitions One final point: All of the above refers to the scoring system used by the BGA for British Rated Competitions. If you find yourself competing in an international gliding competition under IGC rules, you will notice a small number of significant differences between the UK and IGC scoring systems. The two are actually very similar and, if you understand one, you will quickly grasp the other, but they are managed by different bodies and have diverged slightly. The BGA Competitions Committee keeps these differences under review and will adopt IGC changes if they are seen to be appropriate to British gliding. Alan Langlands 26 th Feb 2018