VWP CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION REPORT. Project Name: Berkmar Drive Extension Locality: Albemarle County Inspector: ERM

Similar documents
Suitable Applications Check dams may be appropriate in the following situations: To promote sedimentation behind the dam.

FINAL REPORT. Yonkers Creek Migration Barrier Removal Project Wonderstump Road Del Norte County. Submitted By:

JAP Additional Information Sheet

Sediment Basin 7E-12. Design Manual Chapter 7 - Erosion and Sediment Control 7E - Design Information for ESC Measures BENEFITS.

RULES OF THE OIL AND GAS PROGRAM DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES CHAPTER DRILLING WELLS TABLE OF CONTENTS

As temporary grade control facilities along waterways until final stabilization is established.

Information for File # SEW

General Information for Culvert Design

APPENDIX C VEGETATED EMERGENCY SPILLWAY. VERSION 1.0 March 1, 2011

INFILTRATION PRACTICE MAINTENANCE INSPECTION FORM

ROAD OCCUPANCY PERMIT APPLICATION # Damascus Township, 60 Conklin Hill Road, Damascus, PA Tel Fax

Indiana LTAP Road Scholar Core Course #10 Culvert Drainage. Presented by Thomas T. Burke, Jr., PhD, PE Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd.

APPENDIX J HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY

Culvert Safety Inspection Report

Technical Report Culvert A Hydraulic Analysis

(Revised February,2005) CULVERTS, BRIDGES, AND FORDS

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO OVER THE STRAIGHT RIVER DISTRICT 6 - RICE COUNTY

STRUCTURAL STABILITY ASSESSMENT

June 13, 2016 Tom Garigen Re: Myrtle Beach Golf and Yacht Club Drainage assessment

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH 4 OVER THE BEAVER RIVER ST. LOUIS COUNTY

King. Maureen C. Keller. Tuyen L. Tran, P.E Sr Project Manager. Trusted Professional Services Since 1977

Chapter 11. Culverts and Bridges Design Checklist for Culvert Design

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO MSAS 123 (2 ND AVE. SW) OVER THE CANNON RIVER CITY OF FARIBAULT, RICE COUNTY

CT EXPANSION PROJECT SILT FENCE DESIGN CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGY CONNECTICUT LOOP. Submitted by:..

Eastern Brook Trout Joint Venture Annual Report The Nature Conservancy 2013

Beavers are particularly adept at manipulating their

CHAPTER 5 CULVERT DESIGN

Stream Crossings I: Engineering and Design Approaches to Provide Fish Passage at Culvert Slipline Projects in Connecticut

INADVERTENT RETURN PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILLING (HDD)

TABLE OF CONTENTS LEGAL NOTICE

CCR Landfill 2017 Annual Inspection Report NC1 Ash Disposal Area

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH 133 OVER A DITCH ST. LOUIS COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT METRO DISTRICT - ANOKA COUNTY

CHAPTER 4 SPALDING COUNTY, GEORGIA 4.0 CULVERT DESIGN

Great Lakes Stream Crossing Inventory Instructions

Creation of Fish and Wildlife Habitat on the Closed Salmon Harbour Mine in Minto, NB

City of Burnaby Environmental Review Committee (ERC) Guide for Applicants

Whitewater Valley Station Surface Impoundment Coal Combustion Residual Annual Report

Green CCR Surface Impoundment

Storm Damage Floating Culverts & Other Inlet Issues

Site Diary Campus Drive Relocation Project. Noboru Togawa. Presented to: Dr. Pitt Construction Site Erosion Control

D.B. Wilson Station CCR Landfill

HY-8 Version 7.2 Build Date January 17, Federal Highway Administration.

Water Resources Report RKLD Annual Meeting July 30, 2016

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION FIELD INSPECTION REPORT

PRELIMINARY STORM DRAINAGE REPORT

Project Completion Abstract Fish Passage Activity ( Engineering Activities)

RLRC COMMUNITIES EAST GRAND FORKS AREA CHARACTER THE RED LAKE RIVER & THE RED RIVER OF THE NORTH CONFLUENCE EAGLE POINT BOAT LAUNCH DESIGN

Culvert Design An Overview of the NYS Highway Design Manual Chapter 8

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District

Trout Buffer Variance

ANNUAL INSPECTION BY A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER ALL CCR IMPOUNDMENTS CCR Rule Section (b)

USING A LABYRINTH WEIR TO INCREASE HYDRAULIC CAPACITY. Dustin Mortensen, P.E. 1 Jake Eckersley, P.E. 1

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT DISTRICT 1 PINE COUNTY

CLEANING, INSPECTION, AND TESTING OF SEWERS

Photo 1: Typical 4 Weephole

Illinois State Water Survey

Hard Hat Services ph: hardhatinc.com 932 N. Wright St., Suite 160 Naperville, IL 60563

Hard Hat Services ph: hardhatinc.com 932 N. Wright St., Suite 160 Naperville, IL 60563

FINAL HARRIS CHAIN OF LAKES RESTORATION COUNCIL SITE VISIT SUMMARY. of the. Projects Tour March 3, 2006

If you have comments on this or suggestions for other terms that should be added to this glossary, please send an to

Shovelnose Creek Off-Channel Complex Berm Repair

Estimated on-the-ground start and end dates: 1 June October 2018

RESTORING THE CONNECTION BETWEEN CREEK AND LAKE: FRESH WATER ESTUARINE CREATION IN MISSISSAUGA

City of Guelph. Hanlon Creek Business Park Stormwater Management Report Ponds 1, 2, 3 and 4

Definitions as used in this Subchapter:

ADDENDA B Hydrologic and Hydraulic (H&H) Study Guidance 2019

NWS 44: Mining Activities Location #1, Stanislaus River

CITY OF ROSEVILLE DESIGN STANDARDS

Joe Rathbun Michigan DEQ Water Resources Division Nonpoint Source Unit * Thanks to The Nature Conservancy

Assessment of Soil Erosion at a DC Park Facility Spring Valley Park NW Washington, DC

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT DISTRICT 8 - LAC QUI PARLE COUNTY

River Restoration: Culvers Island weir removals and river naturalisation project.

Introduction to Check Dams

RESPONSE TO COMMENT: 45

Illinois Lake Management Association Conference March 23, 2018 By Trent Thomas Illinois Department of Natural Resources Division of Fisheries

Project Report for Marsh Creek and Albion River Instream Fish Barrier Removal Flynn Creek Road, CR 135, M.P. 8.1 and 8.3

3.0 Basin and Watershed Characteristics

SAFE WALKS PROGRAM FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Becker* Products Below Ground Ball Valve Regulators

Initial Annual CCR Landfill Inspection OML Existing Landfill OML Expansion Phase 1

Stephens Creek Culvert Replacement. CAC April 28, 2010

MEETING CALLED TO ORDER: THOSE PRESENT: EXCUSED: GUESTS: 310 INSPECTION REPORTS ~ READY FOR DECISION:

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH NO. 7 OVER THE SNAKE RIVER DISTRICT 1 - PINE COUNTY

Little Traverse Bay Watershed Road/Stream Crossing Inventory

Climate Change Adaptation and Stream Restoration. Jack Williams;

January 25, Franklin Pasture Sanitary Sewer Cure-In-Place Pipe Lining Bid No Bid Date: 2/7/17 ADDENDUM NO 1

Low Gradient Velocity Control Short Term Steep Gradient Channel Lining Medium-Long Term Outlet Control Soil Treatment Permanent [1]

Notice of Intent to Close Inactive CCR Surface Impoundments

CITY OF SALEM DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS STANDARD DRAWINGS TABLE OF CONTENTS

Five Counties Salmonid Conservation Program - Fish Passage Design Workshop. February 2013

Schedule for Culvert Works in or on the Bed or Bank of a Watercourse PLEASE READ THIS PAGE BEFORE COMPLETING THE APPLICATION FORM

ANNUAL INSPECTION BY A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER ALL CCR IMPOUNDMENTS CCR Rule Section (b)

Hospital Link Project Project Update November 2017

OFFICE OF STRUCTURES MANUAL FOR HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC DESIGN CHAPTER 13 CULVERTS APRIL 2011

HEC 26 Aquatic Organism Passage Design Manual Evolution & Application

Northern Indiana Public Service Company Michigan City Generating Station Primary Settling Pond Number Annual RCRA CCR Unit Inspection Report

Culvert Design for Low and High Gradient Streams in the Midwest. Dale Higgins, Hydrologist Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest

Earthen Embankments. turning into larger, more costly repairs. The following. The State Dam Safety Program has inspection

Final Fish Salvage & Temporary Tailrace Barrier Report for the Wallowa Falls Hydroelectric Project Tailrace. (FERC No. P-308) December 20, 2018

Transcription:

VWP CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION REPORT Inspection Date: August 22, 2016 VWP Permit No. 15-1268 SPGP RO Project Name: Berkmar Drive Extension Locality: Albemarle County Inspector: ERM Impacts: PFO PEM PSS POW Stream Channel WWD STAGE OF CONSTRUCTION Pre-construction Road Infrastructure Final Stabilization Complete Other Clearing/Grubbing Rough Grade Building Construction Final Grade IN COMPLIANCE? YES NO N/A Applicable Permit Condition Construction activities are not substantially disrupting the movement of aquatic life. Proper E&S controls are present, properly maintained, and functioning adequately. Stormwater measures are present and properly preventing stormwater runoff. Surface waters temporarily affected by construction activities have been restored to original elevations and appropriately stabilized. Utility line work in surface waters was performed to minimize disturbance to surface waters and the area was returned to original contours and appropriately stabilized. In-stream work is being performed in the dry with the appropriate use of cofferdams sheetpiling etc, to minimize disturbance of the stream bottom and increases in turbidity. Pipes and/or culverts for road crossings are countersunk a minimum of six inches to provide for the re-establishment of a natural stream bottom and low flow channel. Wetlands outside the construction areas are clearly marked to prevent additional unpermitted wetland impacts and no additional wetland impacts have occurred. Stream banks have been adequately stabilized. Time-of-year restrictions regarding impacts to surface waters are being adhered to. No additional impacts to surface waters have occurred.

GENERAL COMMENTS: DEQ staff (Eric Millard, Paul Demarsh, Duston Staton) performed a joint VWP/Stormwater Construction site inspection on August 22, 2016 at 10 AM. DEQ staff met with Ricky Woody (RK&K), Paul Rash (Lane/Corman), Mark Graham (VDOT), Dave Covington (VDOT), among others. The site inspection was in response to a notification received from Ricky Woody on August 11, 2016 that indicated downstream impacts associated with sediment were observed on July 30 and 31, 2016. Impact area #1: No impacts were permitted in this area for the span crossing of the South Fork Rivanna River. DEQ staff observed this area to ensure no unpermitted impacts to avoided waters had occurred. DEQ staff recommends that the piling constructed closest to the avoided wetlands be returned to grade following construction to prevent draining of avoided wetlands. GENERAL NON-COMPLIANCE ITEMS NOTED: Impact area #2: Impacts associated with a culvert crossing for road. The stream below the culvert installation was observed to have measurable sediment for at least 200 linear feet below crossing. Impact area #3: The upstream and downstream culvert is not countersunk a minimum of 6 inches. The permittee has indicated that the lack of countersinking is due to incomplete construction of the inlet and outlet protection. Once inlet and outlet protection has been completed and the low flow channel has been constructed, the culvert will be appropriately countersunk. Impact area #4: The upstream culvert is not countersunk a minimum of 6 inches. The permittee has indicated that the lack of countersinking is due to incomplete construction of the inlet protection. Once inlet protection has been completed and the low flow channel has been constructed, the culvert will be appropriately countersunk. The erosion and sediment controls adjacent to the upstream culvert section required maintenance. The downstream culvert and stream section below the culvert leading offsite was observed to be completely inundated. The permittee indicated that this is likely due to the downstream neighbor stream crossing has been clogged creating the inundation. The permittee has attempted to contact the downstream property owners with no response. Impact area #5: The downstream culvert is not countersunk a minimum of 6 inches. The permittee has indicated that the lack of countersinking is due to incomplete construction of the

inlet protection. Once inlet protection has been completed and the low flow channel has been constructed, the culvert will be appropriately countersunk. The upstream culvert was not observed. Measurable sediment was observed in the stream channel approximately 300 linear feet below the downstream culvert. DEQ staff observed measurable sediment in the stream to a point approximately adjacent to Flag 263. Impact area #6: The upstream and downstream culvert is not countersunk a minimum of 6 inches. The permittee has indicated that the lack of countersinking is due to incomplete construction of the inlet and outlet protection. Once inlet and outlet protection has been completed and the low flow channel has been constructed, the culvert will be appropriately countersunk. Measurable sediment was observed in the stream channel approximately 200 linear feet below the downstream culvert. DEQ staff observed measurable sediment in the stream to a point approximately adjacent to Flag FF33. Impact area #7: The downstream culverts are not countersunk a minimum of 6 inches for both the larger stream section (Identified as USM G) and the smaller stream section (identified as USM E). The permittee has indicated that the lack of countersinking is due to incomplete construction of the inlet protection. Once inlet protection has been completed and the low flow channel has been constructed, the culvert will be appropriately countersunk. The upstream culverts were not observed. The small stream section discharges at the wing wall of the downstream structure. The small stream section outlet is approximately 1 foot higher than the stream channel. The existing rip rap outlet protection was observed to be full of sediment. The permittee has indicated that they will attempt to seed this area and establish vegetation adjacent to the stream channel. Measurable sediment was observed in the stream channel approximately 30 linear feet below the downstream culvert. DEQ staff also observed sediment below the main stormwater BMP northeast of the downstream culvert. The silt fence at the bottom of the stormwater BMP slope appeared to have been overtopped by sediment. DEQ staff observed measurable sediment in the stream channel below that point for approximately 800 linear feet. DEQ staff observed measurable sediment in the stream to a point approximately adjacent to Flag 600 38. Impact area #8: Measurable sediment was observed in the stream channel approximately 700 linear feet below the downstream culvert. The permittee had already removed sediment in the stream channel prior to the site visit to a point approximately 200 linear feet below the downstream culvert. DEQ staff observed measurable sediment in the stream to a point

approximately adjacent to the DEQ wetland mitigation site for the Hollymead Town Center project. The entire length of stream channel where measureable sediment was observed was located in a DEQ stream mitigation area. The additional unpermitted impacts to surface waters were discovered on July 30-31 and DEQ was notified on August 11, 2016. Permit Part I.G.5. requires DEQ to be notified within 24 hours of discovering impacts to surface waters that are not authorized by the permit. The notification shall include photographs, estimated acreage and/or linear footage of impacts, and a description of the impacts. VWP INPSECTOR:

IMPACTS MAP

PHOTOGRAPHS Photo 2: Impact area 1-North side of SF Rivanna at E&SC measures; Orientation: SW Photo 1: Impact area 1 looking from south side of SF Rivanna River; Orientation: NE Photo 4: Impact area 1-looking at pilings next to avoided wetlands; Orientation: N Photo 3: Impact area 1-Looking at avoided wetlands; Orientation: E

Photo 6: Impact area 1-looking at avoided wetland area; Orientation: N Photo 5: Impact area 1-looking at avoided wetland area; Orientation: E Photo 7: Impact area 2-looking at outlet from SWM BMP; Orientation: SW Photo 8: Impact area 2-looking at culvert; Orientation: SW

Photo 9: Impact area 2-stream channel below SWM BMP outlet (~300 lf of stream channel impacts observed); Orientation: SW Photo 10: Impact area 2-looking downstream. Measureable sediment observed; Orientation: W Photo 12: Impact area 3-looking upstream of culvert inlet; Orientation: NW Photo 11: Impact area 3-looking at culvert inlet; Orientation: SE

Photo 13: Impact area 3-looking at culvert outlet; Orientation: NW Photo 14: Impact area 3-looking downstream from culvert outlet; Orientation: SE Photo 15: Impact area 4-looking at culvert inlet; Orientation: E Photo 16: Impact area 4-looking upstream of culvert inlet; Orientation: NE

Photo 17: Impact area 4-looking at the downstream culvert outlet area; Orientation: S Photo 18: Impact area 4-looking at culvert outlet; Orientation: SW Photo 19: Impact area 4-backwater condition created by downstream clogged culvert crossing; Orientation: SE Photo 20: Impact area 5-looking at culvert outlet; Orientation: NW

Photo 21: Impact area 5-measureable sediment observed in downstream channel (~300 lf of stream channel impacts observed); Orientation: SE Photo 22: Impact area 5- measureable sediment observed in downstream channel; Orientation: SE Photo 23: Impact area 5- measureable sediment observed in downstream channel; Orientation: SE Photo 24: Impact area 5-measureable sediment observed in downstream channel; Orientation: SE

Photo 25: Impact area 6-looking upstream of culvert inlet; Orientation: NW Photo 26: Impact area 6-looking at culvert inlet; Orientation: E Photo 27: Impact area 6-looking at culvert outlet; Orientation: NE Photo 28: Impact area 6-measureable sediment observed in downstream channel(~200 lf of stream channel impacts observed); Orientation: SE

Photo 29: Impact area 6-measureable sediment observed in downstream channel; Orientation: SE Photo 30: Impact area 7-looking at larger stream culvert outlet (USM G); Orientation: W Photo 31: Impact area 7-looking at smaller stream culvert outlet (USM E); Orientation: N Photo 32: Impact area 7-looking downstream just below culvert outlet pipes (~30 lf of stream channel impacts observed); Orientation: NE

Photo 33: Impact area 7-looking below SWM BMP; Orientation: NE Photo 34: Impact area 7-looking below SWM BMP on NE side of silt fence leading toward channel; Orientation: NE Photo 35: Impact area 7-measurable sediment observed in stream channel below SWM BMP (~800 lf of stream channel impacts observed); Orientation: NE Photo 36: Impact area 7-measurable sediment observed in stream channel below SWM BMP; Orientation: NE

Photo 37: Impact area 7-measurable sediment observed in stream channel below SWM BMP; Orientation: NE Photo 38: Impact area 7-measurable sediment observed in stream channel below SWM BMP; Orientation: NE Photo 39: Impact area 7-measurable sediment observed in stream channel below SWM BMP; Orientation: NE Photo 40: Impact area 7-measurable sediment observed in stream channel below SWM BMP; Orientation: NE

Photo 41: Impact area 7-measurable sediment observed in stream channel below SWM BMP; Orientation: NE Photo 42: Impact area 7-measurable sediment observed in stream channel below SWM BMP; Orientation: NE Photo 43: Impact area 7-measurable sediment observed in stream channel below SWM BMP; Orientation: NE Photo 44: Impact area 8-looking at culvert outlet; Orientation: E

Photo 45: Impact area 8-looking at culvert outlet; Orientation: NE Photo 46: Impact area 8-looking downstream from culvert outlet (~200 lf of sediment in stream channel removed prior to inspection); Orientation: S Photo 47: Impact area 8-looking downstream, measureable sediment observed (~500 lf of stream channel impacts observed); Orientation: S Photo 48: Impact area 8-walking downstream measureable sediment observed; Orientation: W

Photo 49: Impact area 8-walking downstream measureable sediment observed; Orientation: W Photo 50: Impact area 8-looking from top of crossing down at culvert inlet; Orientation: NW