ECAT Example Exercises

Similar documents
Highway Safety Manual (HSM) Freeway Training Course

FOR LOOP RAMPS-TAPERED DECELERATION LANE

PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY 613 IMPACT ATTENUATOR WORK DESCRIPTION 3

FREEWAY AND SERVICE ROAD CONNECTIONS

PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY 306 DRAINAGE PIPE WORK DESCRIPTION 4

Freeway System Considerations

Performance-Based Approaches for Geometric Design of Roads. Douglas W. Harwood MRIGlobal 3 November 2014

Roadway Safety Design

Figure 3B-1. Examples of Two-Lane, Two-Way Marking Applications

Calibration of HSM Freeways in Missouri

PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY 405 LIMB MANAGEMENT

PEDESTRIAN ACCOMMODATIONS DPS 201 AT INTERCHANGES

DRIVING ON EXPRESSWAYS/ INTERSTATE CHAPTER 11

INDEX. Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads INDEX

1. Places where one road meets or crosses another are called intersections. F

FREEWAY, WEAVING LANE, AND SERVICE ROAD CONNECTIONS

GIS Based Non-Signalized Intersection Data Inventory Tool To Improve Traffic Safety

(This page left intentionally blank)

Gwinnett County Department of Transportation SR 324 / Gravel Springs Road at I-85 / SR 403 Interchange Project Number F , PI No.

Defining Purpose and Need

Homework Module 7.01 Drivers Manual Study Questions

Paul Huston, P.E., Design-Build Coordinator Chuck Gonderinger, HDR Engineering. Minnesota Department of Transportation (the Department)

Markings Technical Committee Chapter 3H: Roundabout Markings APPROVED IN NCUTCD COUNCIL ON JANUARY 20, 2006

Information on display. Inside this handout. Triangle Area revisions. Project need displays. Preferred alternative on aerial maps

Bicycle - Motor Vehicle Collisions on Controlled Access Highways in Arizona

INTERCHANGES. Module 7

FOR HISTORICAL REFERENCE ONLY

Safety Implications of Managed Lane Cross Sectional Elements (Buffer Width vs. Shoulder Width vs. Lane Width)

c. continue onto the expressway and use the next exit ramp.

I-264 CORRIDOR EVALUATION STUDY. September 7, 2016 Eric Stringfield VDOT Planning Director Chris Lawrence AECOM Senior Transportation Engineer

SIGN PLACEMENT-ELEVATION VIEW: FREEWAY (FORESLOPE) ROADSIDE SIGN LOCATIONS & SUPPORT SPACING MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (MIN.

SECTION 1A NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE GEOMETRIC DESIGN

How Might Connected Vehicles and Autonomous Vehicles Influence Geometric Design? October 10, 2017

J-Turn An Intersection Safety Improvement Purdue Road School 2016 Tuesday, March 8, 2016 Brian Malone, INDOT & Josh Cook, HNTB

MNDOT PAVEMENT DESIGN MANUAL

TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES FOR LOW VOLUME ROADS

Chapter 2B. REGULATORY SIGNS

Subject: Solberg Avenue / I-229 Grade Separation: Traffic Analysis

Act 47 Exception Application Process (Permitting Bicycle Travel on Freeways)

Design Criteria. Design Criteria

Attachment No. 13. National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices RWSTC RECOMMENDATION FOLLOWING SPONSOR COMMENTS

CHAPTER 3A. GENERAL PAGE CHAPTER 3B. PAVEMENT AND CURB MARKINGS PAGE

Access Management in the Vicinity of Intersections

PART 5. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES FOR LOW-VOLUME ROADS TABLE OF CONTENTS

Appendix Work Zone Traffic Control

Characteristics of. Entering & Exiting High Speed Considerations

Iowa Corridor Management Pilot Project Overview. Recommendations For A Corridor Management Program August 2004

RE: 2007 NPA Text (Clean Version)

An International Experience on the Safety Performance of 2+1 cross-section. Basil Psarianos Nat l Techn. Univ. Athens, Greece

BASIC FREEWAY CAPACITY STUDIES Definitions

7.0 FREEWAYS CONGESTION HOT SPOT PROBLEM & IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ANALYSIS & DEFINITION

DESIGN MEMORANDUM WITH DESIGN EXCEPTIONS SP SP

Cycle Track Design Best Practices Cycle Track Sections

CHAPTER 2C. WARNING SIGNS AND OBJECT MARKERS Section 2C.01 Function of Warning Signs

APPENDIX G: INTERSECTION NEEDS AT OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD

SR 53 Corridor Study. Final Report Presentation. Friday, October 3, :00 AM to noon

1.3.4 CHARACTERISTICS OF CLASSIFICATIONS

Presented By: Jim Roth, P.E. Signing Engineer Office of Traffic Engineering Ohio Department of Transportation 1980 West Broad Street Columbus, Ohio

FINAL DESIGN TRAFFIC TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Rebecca Szymkowski, P.E., PTOE Wisconsin Department of Transportation. ITE Midwestern District Annual Meeting June 30, 2015

Let s Make I-40 Better Action Team. Friday, March 29, 2019 Hosted by RTP Foundation

TRAFFIC LINE MANUAL. June 2011 TRAFFIC-ROADWAY SECTION

Section 3A.04 Colors. Section 3B.10 Approach Markings for Obstructions

Vermont Permit Test Flash Cards

Pedestrian Safety at Interchanges

Duke Street (Route 236) Over I Bridge Plan & Elevation

PRESENTATION OUTLINE

QUEEN ELIZABETH WAY / MARTINDALE ROAD BRIDGE DEMOLITION DETOUR ANALYSIS

Appendix B Existing ADOT Data Parameters

LOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION

Updated There is no park access roadway to be constructed points beyond the limit of along full limits of the park's the phase I work. Phase 1. Revise

The first lift, mainline, shall be placed using a spray paver.

I-20 ODESSA-MIDLAND CORRIDOR STUDY. Public Meeting for Schematic Design

February 8, Ms. Jamie Jun, Esq. Fromhold Jaffe & Adams 789 East Lancaster Avenue, Suite 220 Villanova, PA 19085

DOT Policy and Procedure Integrity Excellence Respect

CHAPTER 3 STUDY AREA OPERATIONAL OVERVIEW

THE FUTURE OF THE TxDOT ROADWAY DESIGN MANUAL

CHAPTER 2B. REGULATORY SIGNS

Multilane Roundabouts

CHAPTER 1 STANDARD PRACTICES

Developed by: The American Traffic Safety Services Association (ATSSA) 15 Riverside Parkway, Suite 100 Fredericksburg, VA

IHSDM- HSM Predictive Methods. Slide 1

Traffic Control Inspection Checklist Segment:

APPENDIX A TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

Offset Single Point Interchange I-25 at Rio Bravo Boulevard Albuquerque, New Mexico

October 2004 REVISIONS (2) SUPERELEVATION DEVELOPMENT 11.3(2)

ADOT Maintenance Data Collection Guide

2004 Traffic and Safety Notes. Cross Reference between the Old Note Number and the New Note Number

I-70 NEW STANTON INTERCHANGE

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. Non-NHS State Highways

CITY OF SASKATOON COUNCIL POLICY

PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY 401 MOWING WORK DESCRIPTION 5

Synchro Studio 8. Overview. By Ioannis Psarros

TRAFFIC AND SAFETY NOTE 608A. Spacing for Commercial Drives and Streets. To Promote a Uniform Practice in Determining Access Spacing

INTERSTATE 540 IMPROVEMENT STUDY

PENNDOT HPMS DATA COLLECTION GUIDE. Bureau of Planning and Research Transportation Planning Division April 2016 (Updated March 2018)

PART 2. SIGNS Chapter 2C. Warning Signs and Object Markers

ACCESS MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SR-741 & MIAMISBURG-SPRINGBORO/ AUSTIN PIKE MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO

2003 Edition Page 2B-1

Idaho Driver Education and Training

Transcription:

EAT Example Exercises Exercise : Mainline Freeway Segment (Session 3) Exercise 2: Mainline Freeway Segment 2 (Session 3) Exercise 3: amp Segment (Session 3) Exercise 4: amp Terminal onfiguration (Session 3) Exercise 5: Full Interchange (Session 4)

Session 3 Exercise : Mainline Freeway Segment 2 P age

3 P age

Session 3 Exercise 2: Mainline Freeway Segment 2 4 P age

Session 3 Exercise 3: amp Segment 5 P age

TYPIAL SETIONS 6 P age

Session 3 Exercise 4: amp Terminal onfiguration A4 onfiguration Signal control ¼ mile to next intersection 800 feet between terminals rossroad o 2 median width o 4 lanes both approaches o 2 lane exit ramp approach ight turns yield No right turn bays D4 onfiguration Signal control ¼ mile to next intersection 800 feet between terminals Left turns protected o hannelized o 2 foot lanes ight turns yield o hannelized rossroad o 2 median width o 4 lanes both approaches o 2 lane exit ramp approach Exit ramp approach channelized No outisde approach right turn bay driveway on outside crossroad 7 P age

A4 onfiguration D4 onfiguration 8 P age

Session 4 Exercise 5: Full Interchange PE EONSTUTION ONFIUATION ASSUMPTIONS Design Element Dimensions/ Assumptions Mainline number of basic lanes 4 Mainline lane width 2 Mainline outside shoulder width 0 Mainline inside shoulder width 4 Mainline median width 72 lear zone 30 Mainline median barrier width 2 or 56' (segment 3) Nearest distance from edge of travelled way to median barrier face 8 Outside barrier offset from edge of shoulder 2 umble strips Not present amp right shoulder width 9 amp left shoulder width 4 Diamond ramp lane width 6 Loop ramp lane width 7.5 Average freeway traffic speed 60 MPH POST EONSTUTION ONFIUATION ASSUMPTIONS Design Element Dimensions/ Assumptions Mainline number of basic lanes 6 west end and core, 8 east end Mainline lane width 2 Mainline outside shoulder width 0 Mainline inside shoulder width 0 Mainline median width Varies, 40 52 (40', 48', 52') lear zone 30 Mainline median cable barrier width Nearest distance from edge of travelled way to median barrier face 5 Nearest distance from edge of travelled way to outside shoulder barrier face 2 Outside barrier offset from edge of shoulder 2 umble strips Not present amp right shoulder width 6 amp left shoulder width 4 Diamond ramp lane width 6 2 lane ramp lane width 2 2 lane ramp right shoulder width 8 2 lane ramp left shoulder width 6 Loop ramp lane width 6 Average freeway traffic speed 60 MPH

BILLBOADS SIN POT Sta 209+67.30 207+95. S S NEBASKA AVE PP-8 SIN PP-6 308+73.95 607+98.55 POT Sta 608+50.40 PEOIA ITY OF NEBASKA AVE S S S 40 5 5 0 P P 0 P FAILITY SIN 20 20 AMP NUMBE 2 AADT 325 3200 3 950 4 350 5 350 6 3250 7 2650 0 200 400 SALE IN FEET 2347 2303 DI BLEAHES BLEAHES PEOIA MAINLINE 42200 AADT ON OBSTUTIONS WE 527.97 POT Sta 200+00.00 PIPE ON 200 25 0 0+98.97 46 P Sta 200+87.9 25 204+09.70 205 450 AMP P Sta 06+.88 05+07.29 22 P Sta 205+32.57 AMP 2 605 AMP 30 A M P P Sta 03+74.83 EMETEY OVEHEAD SIN SIN OVEHEAD SIN UNIVESITY AVE DY UN EEK PEOIA OVEHEAD SIN PEOIA DY UN EEK UNIVESITY AVE PEOIA 300 P Sta 300+7.63 POT Sta 300+00.00 30+89.86 60+46.7 304+25.85 AMP 600 3 BOADWAY ST EMETEY BIT TS NEBASKA ONT AVE BOX OVEHEAD SIN OVEHEAD SIN 305 6 400 500 7 700 AMP 705 AMP 4 403+25.78 40+09.29 P Sta 400+00.00 405 05 45 505 P Sta 405+72.30 406+83.84 P Sta 00+43.6 P Sta 408+22.5 POT Sta 00+00.00 00 POT Sta 40+32.82 409+94.08 U UTIL UNIVESITY AVE 50 55 60 65 70 UNIVESITY AVE P P POT Sta 50+00.00 POT Sta 73+97.6 23 59 22 P Sta 600+00.00 605+65.24 546 220 238 35 40 45 5 30 350 33+09.58 2 3 35 40 45 POT Sta 707+89.40 500+47.86 P Sta 500+00.00 32+43.58 707+44.96 POT Sta 49+30.06 232 507+8.60 705+50.25 302 952 POT Sta 48+74.22 226 505+72.46 P Sta 700+00.00 50 70+69.73 67 50 02+07.7 26 39 44 N Segment Sta 5+00 to Sta 27+00 Segment 2 Sta 27+00 to Sta 39+00 Segment 3 Sta 39+00 to Sta 54+00 INEASIN MILEPOST

MAINLINE 42200 AADT POT Sta 26+6.98 24+34.06 AMP NUMBE 2 3 4 6 7 0 200 SALE IN FEET AADT 325 3200 950 6300 3250 2650 25 x 309+47.98 POT Sta 37+00.7 755 POT Sta 65+09.69 P Sta 206+26.0 755 6+ 6.38 35 30 65 203+65.34 205 25 2396 25 755 P Sta 200+00.00 0 20 200 20 400 48 5 2254 4+09.3 5 5 7+20.08 0 0 P Sta 0+00.00 P Sta 0+00.00 209+60.0 P Sta 2+70.66 AMP 20 2 07+62.46 279 64 AMP 6 30 59 05+74.2 605 328 603+42.93 60+95.29 656 609+55.94 60+25.06 60 600 30 33+07.5 32+47.98 73+53.28 P Sta 72+26.3 AMP 05 40 0+88.73 753 P Sta 00+00.00 00 POT Sta 43+0.08 AMP 3 7 AMP AMP 4 UNIVESITY AVE N P Sta 300+00.00 INEASIN MILEPOST 300 97 30+95.28 459 305+96.82 755 305 50 35 40 45 35 40 45 P Sta 47+25.8 P Sta 48+4.82 50 700 2 3 Segment Sta 5+00 to Sta 27+00 Segment 2 Sta 27+00 to Sta 39+00 Segment 3 Sta 39+00 to Sta 54+00 70 400 P Sta 700+00.00 405 656 70+59.42 709+04.58 70+46.07 404+7.42 755 328 P Sta 402+73.05 POT Sta 400+00.00 702+62.38 407+00.73 40 64 705 40 P Sta 408+80.97 4+22.22 29