Bicycling Perceptions and Experiences in Oregon and Southwest Washington. Presented to: The Bicycle Transportation Alliance September 8, 2009

Similar documents
Bicycling Perceptions and Experiences in Oregon and Southwest Washington. Presented to: The Bicycle Transportation Alliance September 8, 2009

Bicycling Perceptions and Experiences in Oregon and Southwest Washington. Presented By: The Inavero Institute September 8, 2009

Briefing Paper #1. An Overview of Regional Demand and Mode Share

Understanding Transit Demand. E. Beimborn, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

The Who and What: Bus Rapid Transit Riders and Systems in the U.S.

How familiar are you with BRT?

1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey

U.S. Bicycling Participation Study

Bike Share Social Equity and Inclusion Target Neighborhoods

WILMAPCO Public Opinion Survey Summary of Results

2016 Capital Bikeshare Member Survey Report

2017 North Texas Regional Bicycle Opinion Survey

Executive Summary. TUCSON TRANSIT ON BOARD ORIGIN AND DESTINATION SURVEY Conducted October City of Tucson Department of Transportation

PORTLAND BICYCLE COUNTS 2007

Kevin Manaugh Department of Geography McGill School of Environment

Capital Bikeshare 2011 Member Survey Executive Summary

Lessons from the Green Lanes: Evaluating Protected Bike Lanes

Rail Station Fact Sheet University of Dallas Station

Among the key specific findings from the survey are the following:

Rider Satisfaction Survey Total Market 2006

August NW Glisan St, Suite 401 Portland, OR (503)

BUILDING THE CASE FOR TRAVEL OPTIONS IN WASHING TON COUNTY. Image: Steve Morgan. Image: Steve Morgan

2016 Capital Bikeshare Member Survey Report

Among the key specific findings from the survey are the following:

2011 Origin-Destination Survey Bicycle Profile

Baseline Survey of New Zealanders' Attitudes and Behaviours towards Cycling in Urban Settings

Bicycle Helmet Use Among Winnipeg Cyclists January 2012

Capital and Strategic Planning Committee. Item III - B. April 12, WMATA s Transit-Oriented Development Objectives

2017 Northwest Arkansas Trail Usage Monitoring Report

Lessons from the Green Lanes:

Sun Metro Fixed Route Rider Survey

Complete Streets 101: The Basics

ROLLER DERBY DEMOGRAPHICS:

Summary of NWA Trail Usage Report November 2, 2015

Comments EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2014 Fishers Trail Count

Health, Transportation and Bicycling: Connecting the Dotted Lines

LESSONS FROM THE GREEN LANES: EVALUATING PROTECTED BIKE LANES IN THE U.S.

El Paso County 2040 Major Transportation Corridors Plan

ITS-NY ANNUAL MEETING Bus Rapid Transit in New York City: Bus Lane Operations on One-Way Arterial Streets

MTA Surveys: Facts and Findings. NYMTC Brown Bag March 12, 2014 Julia Seltzer, MTA Planning

Measuring and growing active modes of transport in Auckland

Lawrence Bike Share Feasibility Study

CYCLING STRATEGY RESEARCH PUBLIC TELEPHONE SURVEY JANUARY HarGroup Management Consultants

FACTS AND FIGURES: MAKING THE CASE FOR COMPLETE STREETS IN LEE COUNTY

Travel and Rider Characteristics for Metrobus

AAMPO Regional Transportation Attitude Survey

Philadelphia Bus Network Choices Report

AGENDA: November IO, 1998 REPORT BACK ON BICYCLE SAFETY PROGRAMS

Rail Station Fact Sheet UNT Dallas Station

WALKNBIKE DRAFT PLAN NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE

Summary Report: Built Environment, Health and Obesity

Rail Station Fact Sheet CentrePort/DFW Airport Station

COLUMBUS AVENUE NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSPORTATION STUDY

Board-Approved Funding Awards for Cycle 4 Active Transportation Grant Program Projects (in Order of Project Rankings) Approved on

South Bay Bicycle Master Plan American Planning Association National Conference Los Angeles, CA

PASSENGER SURVEY RESULTS

Rider Satisfaction Survey Phoenix Riders 2004

Bikeway action plan. Bicycle Friendly Community Workshop March 5, 2007 Rochester, MN

Chicago Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Initiative Final Report

Chapter PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND ACCOUNTABILITY. Introduction

Multimodal Transportation Plan

Proposed Bicycle Ambassador Program. Transportation Enhancement Funding Application

Agenda. US-1 Corridor Study and HIA Update. Pathway Diagram / Primary Indicators. Research Questions. Linking Multimodal Improvements to Indicators

North Kitsap Trails Association: String of Pearls Trails Survey Results July 13, 2010

People killed and injured per million hours spent travelling, Motorcyclist Cyclist Driver Car / van passenger

Evaluation of San Diego's First CicloSDias Open Streets Event

Categorizing Cyclists: What Do We Know? Insights from Portland, OR

Mayor s Pedestrian Advisory Council. Wednesday, November 8 th

NACTO Designing Cities 2014 Dongho Chang, City Traffic Engineer October 23, 2014

OVERVIEW OF METHODOLOGY

Seattle Department of Transportation. Web Panel Survey February 2018

DKS & WASHINGTON COUNTY Washington County Transportation Survey

Target population involvement in urban ciclovias: a preliminary evaluation of St. Louis Open Streets

Organizing Successful Bike Trains

MORE CONNECTIONS. Redesigning routes for the future of transit in Milwaukee County.

Breaking Barriers to Bike Share: Lessons on Bike Share Equity

PETITION AND LETTER WRITING BEST PRACTICES

NASHUA REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN

When composing the study, our primary source for content analysis was a study

Bicycle Corrals Portland Designing Streets NYC October 25, 2012 Roger Geller, Bicycle Coordinator Portland, OR

A Traffic Operations Method for Assessing Automobile and Bicycle Shared Roadways

Corridor Vision Workshop Summary James Madison Elementary February 22,2018

From Protected Bike Lanes to Robust Bikeway Networks

Bike to the Future c/o Portage Avenue. Winnipeg, MB. R3B 2B2 Fax:

OC Healthy Communities Forum. The proportion of the population that live within a half mile of a major transit access point.

Bike Walk Twin Cities 2013 Count Report

Where do People Bicycle? The Role of Infrastructure in Determining Bicycle Behavior

Welcome! Public Open House on UBC s Transportation Plan

Cyclist-reported habits of helmet usage and differences in riding postures by using helmets

The Impact of TennCare: A Survey of Recipients 2006

METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN OUTREACH: INTERACTIVE MAP SUMMARY REPORT- 10/03/14

Cheryl Thole CUTR/NBRTI, Senior Research Associate Tampa, Florida

Building a Toronto that Moves

Is St. Louis Ready for a Bike Share System? May 14, 2014 Public Open House

Joint Plan for Orderly Annexation of Gainesville s Urban Reserve Area

RE-CYCLING A CITY: EXAMINING THE GROWTH OF CYCLING IN DUBLIN

Transportation Issues Poll for New York City

What is Going on with Complete Streets

Life Transitions and Travel Behaviour Study. Job changes and home moves disrupt established commuting patterns

Transcription:

Bicycling Perceptions and Experiences in Oregon and Southwest Washington Presented to: The Bicycle Transportation Alliance September 8, 2009 404 NW 10th Ave Suite 201 Portland, OR 97209 P 800.921.2640 www.inavero.com Inavero Institute for Service Research 2009

TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary Bicycling in Oregon and SW Washington A BTA perspective Profile of respondents Automobile ownership by cyclists Percentage of trips taken by bicycle Impact of perceived safety on bicycling Primary purpose of bicycling trips taken Profile of BTA membership Perceptions of the BTA Why members join BTA and why they leave BTA priorities PAGE 3 3 4 5 6 8 11 12 13 15 16 18 20 PAGE 2

KEY FINDINGS: BICYCLING IN OREGON AND SW WASHINGTON Eighty-nine percent of cyclists also own at least one automobile. (Page 6) Automobile ownership does not differ by cycling experience level, but usage drops significantly as cyclists become more comfortable riding. (Page 8) Advanced cyclists use their automobile for roughly 25 percent of trips taken throughout the week, compared to 63 percent for noncyclists. (Page 8) As bicyclists become more comfortable, the number and percentage of weekly trips taken by bike increase significantly. (Page 9) There is a direct correlation between feelings of personal safety and the number and percentage of weekly trips that are taken by bike. (Page 10) Eugene riders take the highest percentage of their weekly trips by bicycle. (Page 11) North, Northeast and Southeast Portland travel more by bike than other Portland Metro areas. (Page 11) Commuting is the most common purpose of bicycle trips made by intermediate and advanced cyclists. (Page 12) PAGE 3

A BTA PERSPECTIVE KEY FINDINGS: The BTA currently serves affluent intermediate and advanced cyclists, 35 years or older. (Page 15) lower, overall the ratings of the BTA are reasonably strong. (Page 16) The BTA is currently viewed as a strong and effective advocate, but some would like the organization to be even more effective, inclusive and focused. (Page 17) Advocacy and safe bicycle routes dominate the reasons current BTA members joined the organization (Page 18) - & 21) reasons. (Page 19) PAGE 4

MORE THAN 2,000 PEOPLE TOOK PART IN THE SURVEY Fifty-eight percent rate themselves as!" #" Nearly half (49 percent) are current BTA members. Thirty-seven percent are female and 60 percent are married. The majority (57 percent) are younger than 45, though 21 percent are 55+. '()*+*,-./ 012-))134*+*,-./ 5)/13617-8/14*+*,-./ #&" $%" Nearly 9 out of 10 (85 percent) have a 4-year college degree or higher. 97:8)*174*+*,-./ Many survey participants are affluent, with more than one-third reporting income above $90,000. PAGE 5

NEARLY 9 OUT OF 10 CYCLISTS ALSO OWN AT LEAST ONE AUTOMOBILE <==" &="?="!=" Automobile and bicycle ownership by cycling skill level ;<" <>& &&" ;=" &&" %># $>$!># '()*+*,-./ 012-))13 5)/13617-8/1 97:8)*17 "4(@)-)248/4,18./4()14*83 9:138214)A6B134(C40-*+*,1.4D@)17 The average number of bicycles owned increases as skill level improves. The skill level of the cyclist does not have a direct impact on whether someone owns an automobile, but Noncyclists are nearly twice as likely to own 3 or more cars than any other group (17 percent compared to 9 percent of cyclists) More than 14 percent of participants from Southeast, Northeast and North Portland report not owning a single automobile, significantly higher than other neighborhoods or regions. PAGE 6

AUTOMOBILE OWNERSHIP DIFFERS SIGNIFICANTLY BY REGION Survey participants from Eugene were most likely to report not owning an automobile at 20 percent. All of the people participating from the Bend/Sisters area reported owning at least one automobile. Within the Portland Metro area, residents of Southeast, Northeast and North Portland report the lowest car ownership. -Centric Areas % Who Don't Own a Car Avg Number of Cars Owned Eugene 20% 1.2 Portland Metro 13% 1.4 Other areas in OR and Southwest WA 3% 2.0 Bend/Sisters 0% 1.9 -Centric Neighborhoods % Who Don't Own a Car Avg Number of Cars Owned Southeast Portland 15% 1.3 Northeast Portland 15% 1.3 North Portland 14% 1.2 Northwest Portland 12% 1.4 Vancouver 10% 1.9 Beaverton/Hillsboro 9% 1.7 Southwest Portland 7% 1.6 PAGE 7

AS BICYCLING INCREASES, CAR AND MASS TRANSIT USAGE DECLINE?="!=" %=" =" D:138,, '()*+*,-./ 012-))134*+*,-./ 5)/13617-8/14 *+*,-./ 97:8)*174*+*,-./ 0+4E8..4F38).-/ 0+40-*+*,1 0+4G83 0+4H((/ Noncyclists rely on travel by automobile for nearly two-thirds of their weekly trips. Advanced cyclists take roughly half of their trips by bike. The percentage of trips taken on mass transit drops as the level of cyclist increases. Roughly 20 percent of trips are taken by foot each week regardless of propensity to ride a bicycle. PAGE 8

<= &?! % = ADVANCED CYCLISTS TAKE 3 TIMES AS MANY TRIPS BY BICYCLE AS BEGINNERS Weekly Trips Taken by Bicycle and Car!"# <" $$# <;" $I" "%# #=" '()*+*,-./ 012-))134*+*,-./ 5)/13617-8/14*+*,-./ 97:8)*174*+*,-./ J11K,+4F3-L.4B+40-*+*,1 "4(C4F3-L.4B+40-*+*,1 "4(C4F3-L.4B+4G83 &'# As cycling experience levels increase, so do the number and percentage of trips that occur by bicycle. Advanced cyclists take 9 trips per week by bike, on average, compared to only 3 trips by beginners. Automobile usage decreases significantly as the experience level of the cyclist increases. Experienced cyclists use their cars roughly half as often as noncyclists (4.2 trips per week, compared to 8, on average). Use of mass transit and walking do not change significantly based on experience level of the cyclist. PAGE 9

EUGENE LEADS IN PERCENTAGE OF WEEKLY TRIPS TAKEN BY BICYCLE More than half of all weekly trips by study participants from Eugene were by bike, higher than any other area. North and Southeast Portland have the highest percentage of weekly trips that occur by bicycle (47 percent). Southwest Portland has the lowest percentage of weekly trips conducted by bicycle, followed by the Beaverton/Hillsboro area. -Centric Areas % of Trips that are by Bicycle Avg Weekly Trips by Bicycle Eugene 55% 8.3 Bend/Sisters 46% 6.9 Portland Metro 43% 7.4 Other areas 37% 5.6 -Centric Neighborhoods % of Trips that are by Bicycle Avg Weekly Trips by Bicycle North Portland 47% 8.2 Southeast Portland 47% 8.0 Northeast Portland 45% 8.3 Vancouver 42% 6.7 Northwest Portland 37% 6.6 Beaverton/Hillsboro 35% 5.1 Southwest Portland 32% 4.7 PAGE 10

PERCEIVED SAFETY DIRECTLY IMPACTS PERCENTAGE OF TRIPS TAKEN BY BIKE Those who rate bicycling safety in their community a 10 (out of 10) ride their bike more than twice as often in an average week compared to those who rate safety a 0 or 1. The Impact Perceived Safety has on Bicycle Ridership <= &?! % %>= '(>4(C4F3-L.4F8K1)40+40-K14L134J11K "4(C4J11K,+4F3-L.4F8K1)40+40-K1?>??>; #>; #>?!$" $>! $#" $?" $#" %<" #>; $&"?>$!=" I>; &><!?"!I" ;>= #=" = <=" M/3()2,+4 N-.82311 = < % $! #? I & ; <=!"#$#%"&'("&()$(#*))+&",$("-(-./0(/*1()02(301-*&.%%$4 M/3()2,+4 92311 PAGE 11

BIKE COMMUTING IS THE MOST COMMON TYPE OF BICYCLE TRIP TAKEN Purpose of Weekly Bicycling Trips?="!=" %=" =" D:138,, 012-))134*+*,-./ 5)/13617-8/14*+*,-./ 97:8)*174*+*,-./ G(66A/-)2 O1)138,4/38).L(3/8/-() P1*318/-()8,43(874*+*,-)2 QR13*-.1S/38-)-)2 Nearly 40 percent of all bicycling trips are for commuting purposes. Beginning cyclists bike commute roughly half as often as more advanced cyclists. Those who rate themselves as intermediate or advanced, use their bicycles in very similar fashion. A higher percentage of beginning cyclists rides are for recreational purposes. PAGE 12

EUGENE RATES THEIR ACCESS TO ROUTES AND SAFETY HIGHEST IN AREA Eugene residents rate their access to routes and overall safety higher than other regions included in the study. Access to routes is rated consistently higher than overall safety. M/3()2,+492311 <= Rating the Regions Bicycling Routes and Safety &?! T(3/,8)74E1/3( 01)74S4M-./13. QA21)1 D/U1349318. 54U8:142((748**1..4/(4B-*+*,-)243(A/1.48)74/38-,.4-)46+4*(66A)-/+> 0-*+*,-)24-)46+4*(66A)-/+4-.4.8C14C(3461V4L13.()8,,+> 0-*+*,-)24-)46+4*(66A)-/+4-.4.8C14C(346+4@U(,14C86-,+> PAGE 13

ACCESS TO ROUTES AND SAFETY RATED HIGHEST IN EAST AND NORTH PORTLAND Residents of Southeast, Northeast and North Portland rate access to bicycling routes and safety higher than in other neighborhoods. Family bicycling safety is rated significantly lower than personal safety in each neighborhood included in the study. Rating Portland Metro Area Bicycling Routes and Safety M/3()2,+492311 <= &?! D:138,, M(A/U@1./4 T(3/,8)7 M(A/U18./4 T(3/,8)7 '(3/U18./4 T(3/,8)7 '(3/U4 T(3/,8)7 '(3/U@1./4 T(3/,8)7 018:13/()S4 W-,,.B(3( X8)*(A:13 54U8:142((748**1..4/(4B-*+*,-)243(A/1.48)74/38-,.4-)46+4*(66A)-/+> 0-*+*,-)24-)46+4*(66A)-/+4-.4.8C14C(3461V4L13.()8,,+> 0-*+*,-)24-)46+4*(66A)-/+4-.4.8C14C(346+4@U(,14C86-,+> PAGE 14

A PROFILE OF BTA MEMBERS Current and former BTA members rate their skill levels higher than nonmembers. Females responding to the survey were more likely to be former members. BTA Members are significantly older and more likely to have incomes greater than $50,000. BTA Membership Current Former Nonmembers Rate Their Skill as Intermediate or Advanced 96% 92% 83% Are Considering Joining the BTA N/A N/A 53% Are Female 36% 42% 36% Are Less than 35 Years Old 16% 22% 43% Have a 4-Year College Degree or Higher 89% 83% 80% Are Married 65% 56% 56% Have Children in Household 21% 22% 27% Have a Household Income Above $50,000 81% 73% 66% Weekly Trips Taken by Bicycle 45% 43% 39% Bicycle Trips Taken While Commuting 40% 36% 38% PAGE 15

PERCEPTIONS OF THE BTA ARE LOWER FOR NONMEMBERS IN ALL AREAS Nonmembers rate the BTA significantly lower in each of the areas listed, compared to current members. The BTA is much higher rated for advocacy than for its education of children and adults. The minor drop in rating from current to former members indicates limited loss of membership due to satisfaction-related issues. 5.4:13+41CC1*/-:14 8.48)487:(*8*+4 23(AL> 5.484/3A./174.(A3*14()4B-*+*,-)2Y31,8/174 -..A1.> N(1.4842((74Z(B4(C4/18*U-)24B-*+*,14.8C1/+4/(4*U-,731)> N(1.4842((74Z(B4(C4/18*U-)24B-*+*,14.8C1/+4/(487A,/.> N(1.4842((74Z(B4(C431L31.1)/-)246+4)117.48)74-)/131./.> W8.4*().-./1)/,+4 61/4(341R*1171746+41RL1*/8/-().> I>; I>$?>; &>? &>< I>? I>& I>#?>;?>&?><?>$ I>I I># = %!? & <= M/3()2,+4 N-.82311 GA331)/40F94E16B13 H(361340F94616B13 '(/48CC-,-8/174@-/U40F9 M/3()2,+4 92311 PAGE 16

PEOPLE VIEW BTA AS AN EFFECTIVE AND EDUCATIONAL BICYCLE ADVOCATE Advocacy is the most common word used to describe both the current BTA, as well as the ideal version of the organization. twice as many listed it as their ideal version of the organization. M/3()2,+4 N-.82311 M/3()2,+4 92311 PAGE 17

ADVOCACY DRIVES BTA MEMBERSHIP FOR MAJORITY OF CURRENT MEMBERS Local and regional advocacy are the most common reasons current members joined BTA Roughly half of current members joined because of interest in the Bicycle Boulevards campaign, or bicycle safety education. Pedestrian safety issues are important to a much smaller percentage of BTA members than other campaigns. The Bike Commute Challenge (ran annually) is a good campaign to create interest in the BTA among nonmembers. I joined the BTA because I am interested in: T(3/,8)7YE1/3(48318487:(*8*+ M/8/14,12-.,8/-:1487:(*8*+ 97:(*8*+4/U3(A2U(A/4312-() 0-*+*,14B(A,1:837.4*86L8-2) 0-*+*,14.8C1/+417A*8/-() '8/-()8,487:(*8*+ 0-K14G(66A/14GU8,,1)21 M8C14P(A/1.4/(4M*U((, 0,A1L3-)/4C(3401//1340-*+*,-)2 T171./3-8)4.8C1/+417A*8/-() T171./3-8)4.8C1/+41)C(3*161)/4238)/. Q+14/(4Q+14*86L8-2) 9,-*149@837.48)749A*/-() D/U134318.(). I!"?$"?<" #<"!&" $I" $$" $<" %I" <I" <<" <=" I" <!" =" %#" #=" I#" <==" PAGE 18

FINANCIAL CONCERNS ARE PRIMARY REASON PEOPLE DROP MEMBERSHIP Financial reasons was mentioned nearly four times as often as any other reason for people dropping their BTA membership Nearly 1 in 10 reported that they renew. Very few (2 percent) indicate they no longer ride their bicycle. variety of reasons, such as: Moved out of area Fail to see the ongoing benefit Feel it is only focused on Portland area Procrastinated and plan on renewing Why did you decide not to renew your BTA membership? H-)8)*-8,4318.(). [(./4-)/131./ N-.8231174@-/U4840F94L(,-*+ J8.)\/48@831454)117174/(431)1@ N-.8LL(-)/-)241RL13-1)*14@-/U40F9 N()\/43-71484B-*+*,148)+6(31 D/U13 %"?" <<" <<" ;" $%"!<" =" %#" #=" PAGE 19

ADVOCACY AND ENCOURAGING ADULT RIDERS ARE TOP MEMBER PRIORITIES Members clearly want BTA to focus on local and regional advocacy and encouraging adults to ride bicycles. Bicycle safety education is more of a priority for former BTA members and nonmembers. Advocacy throughout Oregon and SW Washington is significantly more important to former BTA members. Please rank the following items in terms of the priority you would like the BTA to give them. (% Ranking Item in Top 3) [(*8,4]T(3/,8)7YE1/3(48318^487:(*8*+ Q)*(A382-)2487A,/.4 /(43-714B-*+*,1. M/8/14,12-.,8/-:14 87:(*8*+ 97:(*8*+4/U3(A2U(A/4D312()48)74MJ4J8.U-)2/() 0-*+*,14.8C1/+417A*8/-()4C(3487A,/. 0-*+*,14.8C1/+417A*8/-()4C(34*U-,731) Q)*(A382-)24*U-,731)4 /(43-714B-*+*,1. '8/-()8,487:(*8*+ &"?" <<"?$" #="!&" #&" #!"?="!#" $;" $?" $!"!=" %?" %I" $I"!%" %;" $!" $?" $%" $%" $$" =" %="!="?=" &=" GA331)/40F94E16B13 H(361340F94616B13 '(/48CC-,-8/174@-/U40F9 PAGE 20

LOCAL AND STATE-LEVEL ADVOCACY ARE MOST IMPORTANT TO MEMBERSHIP The Bicycle Boulevards campaign is significantly more important to nonmembers, while state advocacy is more important to current members. Safety related issues are more important to former BTA members and nonmembers. Please rank the 3 activities that you believe are most important for supporting bicycling in your community. (% Ranking Item in Top 3) T(3/,8)7YE1/3(48318487:(*8*+ M/8/14,12-.,8/-:14 87:(*8*+ 0-*+*,14 B(A,1:837.4*86L8-2) 97:(*8*+4/U3(A2U(A/4D312()48)74MJ4J8.U-)2/() 0-*+*,14.8C1/+417A*8/-() M8C14P(A/1.4/(4M*U((, 0,A1L3-)/4C(3401//1340-*+*,-)2 0-K14G(66A/14GU8,,1)21 '8/-()8,487:(*8*+ Q+14/(4Q+14*86L8-2)!#"!$"!&" $;" $%"!%"!&" #$" $#" $$" %#" $!"!<"!=" %%" %;" $=" <$" <<" <I" <%" <%" <?" <=" &" <<"?" I" I"?#" =" %="!="?=" &=" GA331)/40F94E16B13 H(361340F94616B13 '(/48CC-,-8/174@-/U40F9 PAGE 21