Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Council May 15, 2015

Similar documents
Franklin Boulevard Traffic Calming Study. Public Meeting #1 October 11, 2017

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Toward Zero Deaths. Regional SHSP Road Show Meeting. Virginia Strategic Highway Safety Plan. presented by

RESOLUTION NO ?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Bicycle and Pedestrian Chapter TPP Update Overview. TAB September 20, 2017

Perryville TOD and Greenway Plan

Omaha s Complete Streets Policy

Pinellas County Safety Initiatives

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

Edgehill Rd. Sharrow & Buffered Bike Lane

VAN AKEN DISTRICT CONNECTIONS PLAN COMMUNITY MEETING #1 June 20, 2016 SMITHGROUP JJR WSP PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF STUDIO GRAPHIQUE

SAFETY PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND TARGET SETTING. Transportation Subcommittee September 15, 2017

Watertown Complete Streets Prioritization Plan. Public Meeting #1 December 14, 2017

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

MAYFIELD ROAD CORRIDOR MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN. Public Workshop

» Draft Recommendations» Discussion» Next Steps. Plan for Walking and Biking

NJDOT Complete Streets Checklist

City of San Diego Vision Zero Draft Strategic Plan FY 2017

San Jose Transportation Policy

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

Bicycle-Pedestrian Master Plan: Chapters 3 and 4 Distribution

EMPHASIS AREA 1: PEDESTRIANS

Bicycle and Pedestrian Connectivity Study. Old Colony Planning Council

Lynchburg District Update

PEDALING FORWARD. A Glance at the SFMTA s Bike Program for SFMTA.COM

Oakland Pedestrian Master Plan Oakland Pedestrian Plan Draft Recommendations Chapter Outline

Bicycle and Pedestrian Plans and Improvements

City of Birmingham Draft Multi-modal Transportation Plan

CHAPTER 3: Vision Statement and Goals

Road Diets FDOT Process

DRAFT MOVING FORWARD RHODE ISLAND BICYCLE MOBILITY PLAN 2018 PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY IN ASSOCIATION WITH

City of Jacksonville Mobility Fee Update

2. Vision & Goals. Vision. Santa Rosa is a community where walking and bicycling are comfortable and convenient for people of all ages and abilities.

Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies

Shifting Gears for a Healthier City

Living Streets Policy

Solana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS)

CAHOON PARK AREA CONNECTIVITY STUDY. City of Bay Village Prepared by the Northeast Ohio Areawide Coordinating Agency October 2017

Pine Hills Road Pedestrian/Bicycle Safety Study Board of County Commissioners Work Session

A CHANGING CITY. of Edmonton, it is essential that it reflects the long-term vision of the City.

Agenda. Overview PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Appendix D: Planning Level Cost Calculator

ACTIA Programs Annual Compliance Report Reporting Year Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Table 1: Summary of Expenditures and Accomplishments

Closing Plenary Session

Downtown Naples Mobility and Connectivity Study. Naples City Council Presentation January 2017

Safety & Convenience for All Users, in All Modes. Barbara McCann NCSL December 3, 2013

CITY OF PORTSMOUTH PLANNING DEPARTMENT

TOWN OF PORTLAND, CONNECTICUT COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

AGENDA ACTION ITEMS INFORMATION ITEMS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Vision

City of Gainesville Transportation/Roadway Needs PROJECT SUMMARY

GIS Based Data Collection / Network Planning On a City Scale. Healthy Communities Active Transportation Workshop, Cleveland, Ohio May 10, 2011

Beach Cities Living Streets Design Manual and Aviation Boulevard Multimodal Corridor Plan

We believe the following comments and suggestions can help the department meet those goals.

City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary

Public Workshop #2. September 14, 2016

HARRISON STREET/OAKLAND AVENUE COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION PLAN

BALBOA AREA: TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS & PLANNING

CITY OF SLO SEEKS INPUT ON PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE FOR BROAD STREET BICYCLE BOULEVARD PROJECT

F L E T C H E R A V E N U E

Dr. M.L. King, Jr. Street North Complete Streets Resurfacing Opportunities HOUSING, LAND USE, AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MARCH 22, 2018

SRTS IMPLEMENTATION COSTS

AMATS Complete Streets Policy

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

Hillsborough Pedestrian Safety Action Plan 2015 Update. Hillsborough MPO BPAC May 2015

Michael Parmer, Management Aide, City Manager's Office

City of Wilsonville 5 th Street to Kinsman Road Extension Project

Telegraph Avenue Complete Streets DRAFT Recommendations. Oakland Public Works Department September 11 and 13, 2014 Open Houses

Pedestrian & Bicycle Safety Innovations & Applications

Bicycle and Pedestrian Connectivity Study Phase 2

Pedestrian Safety Guide for Transit Agencies

Chapter 2. Bellingham Bicycle Master Plan Chapter 2: Policies and Actions

New Castle County Bicycle Plan. Heather Dunigan ext

FLORIDA STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN

BIKE PLAN CONTENTS GATEWAY

Overview. Illinois Bike Summit IDOT Complete Streets Policy Presentation. What is a Complete Street? And why build them? And why build them?

Transportation Planning Division

Bicycle Lanes Planning, Design, Funding South Mountain Partnership Trails Workshop Roy Gothie PennDOT Statewide Bicycle Pedestrian Coordinator

Citywide Sidewalk and Crosswalk Programs

2018 Pedestrian and Bicycle and Safe Routes to School Application for Funding Page 1 of 31

WELCOME. Thank you for joining us at the Second Public Workshop for the Carlsbad Pedestrian Master Plan. We look forward to receiving your feedback.

6/22/2018 VIA . Darcy Goulart, Planning Manager City of Rancho Cordova Planning Department 2729 Prospect Park Drive Rancho Cordova, CA 95670

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION

Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines

CRESTON ROAD COMPLETE AND SUSTAINABLE STREETS CORRIDOR PLAN

Meeting Schedule 7:00-7:15 Open House 7:15-7:45 Existing Conditions/Short-Term Improvements Study Presentation 7:45-8:00 Q&A Session 8:00-8:10

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR S REPORT. Board of Directors, December 8, 2017

Cyclists and Bikeways: What s your match? A guide to bikeway options for a variety of cyclists

Background Planning Committee STAFF REPORT March 7, 2018 Page 2 of 2 On June 21, 2017, the Authority approved the programming of second cycle One Bay

Montford Drive Parking & Circulation Study

City of Elizabeth City Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines

Public Information Centre

2018 AASHTO BIKE GUIDE

Pedestrian, Bicycle and Traffic Calming Strategic Implementation Plan. January 18, 2011

Chapter 4: Funding and Implementation

CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES

Orange County s Transportation Planning and Multimodal Corridor Plan

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

Transcription:

Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Council May 15, 2015

Updates Spring Bike/Ped counts took place Tuesday May 12 Thursday, May 14 40 volunteers and locations counted across the region More than double the data collected in previous counts Ped. Safety Study kicked off last week Evaluating different pedestrian crossing treatments Video of midblock pedestrian crossings Detroit Ave./Manor Park (Lakewood) Lee Road (Cleveland Heights)

Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Council May 15, 2015

TLCI Policy Adopted by the NOACA Board January 23, 2015 Continues positive impact of the program with support of Planning Grants Creates new Implementation Grants Policy lays out: TLCI Objectives Eligibility Project Selection Funding Sponsor Responsibility

TLCI Policy Total TLCI Planning and Implementation Grants budget for FY 2016 is $1 million Up to 50 percent of funds are available for Planning Grants ($500,000) for FY 2016 Received 11 planning grant applications requesting $669,000 in TLCI funding Projects were evaluated by NOACA staff All projects were evaluated for NOACA Technical Assistance

Recommended for Funding Sponsor 2016 TLCI Planning Grant Application Recommendations Recommended For TLCI Planning Grants Project Name Recommended Award Total Project Cost Fairview Park Center Ridge Road Complete Streets Project $64,000 $80,000 Shaker Heights Van Aken District Connections Plan $60,000 $75,000 CCPC Northfield/Warrensville Center Corridor $96,000 $120,000 Gates Mills Chagrin Valley Connectors $60,000 $75,000 Cleveland Midway Cycle Track & Protected Bike Facilities $60,000 $92,000 Parma West Creek Quarry District Initiative $60,000 $75,000 Cleveland E. 79th Street Transportation Oriented Corridor $75,000 $93,750 $475,000 $610,750

Recommended for NOACA Technical Assistance Recommended For NOACA Technical Assistance Sponsor Bay Village Chardon Project Name Cahoon Park Area Connectivity Study Chardon Sidewalk Connectivity Analysis

Not Recommended for TLCI Funding Ineligible for TLCI/Not Recommended Sponsor Newburgh Heights Project Name Harvard Road Connector All Purpose Trail Brooklyn Big Creek/I-71 Relocation & Restoration Initiative

Next Steps June 10, 2015 Board action Following Board approval, staff will work with the TLCI planning grant recipients and TA project recipients on implementation

Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Council May 15, 2015

TLCI Policy Adopted by the NOACA Board January 23, 2015 Continues positive impact of the program with support of Planning Grants Policy lays out: TLCI Objectives Eligibility Project Selection Funding Sponsor Responsibility Creates new Implementation Grants Enhance the impact of TLCI planning by helping partners achieve planned goals

Analysis of Completed TLCI Studies 4 categories of TLCI transportation recommendations Vehicular Bicycle Pedestrian Transit Implementation grants are focused on Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Transit, but can have Vehicular benefits Some common recommendation categories trend as more expensive projects, precluding them from available budget

Analysis of Completed TLCI Studies 16% Vehicular Recommendations from TLCI Studies 14% 14% 12% 10% 8% 11% 10% 9% 8% 6% 4% 2% 7% 6% 6% 5% 4% 4% 4% 4% 3% Total 0% 1% 1%

Analysis of Completed TLCI Studies 25% Bicycle Recommendations from TLCI Studies 20% 21% 18% 15% 10% 14% 14% 12% Total 5% 0% 5% 4% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%

Analysis of Completed TLCI Studies 18% Pedestrian Recommendations from TLCI Studies 16% 17% 14% 12% 12% 10% 8% 10% 9% 8% 6% 4% 7% 7% 6% 6% 5% Total 2% 3% 3% 3% 0% 2% 1% 1%

Analysis of Completed TLCI Studies 70% Transit Recommendations from TLCI Studies 60% 65% 50% 40% 30% Total 20% 10% 0% 10% TWE New Bus Route New Station Wayfinding and Signage 8% 6% 6% 4% 2% Transit Center New Rail Access Management

Survey Responses 23 Responses Cities, community partners, county agencies, transit agencies, park districts Survey asked participants to identify and detail recommendations Prioritize top three Surveys are from completed TLCI plans and non-tlci local plans with livability recommendations

Survey Responses 90% Summary of TLCI Implementation Survey Responses 80% 70% 78% 60% 65% 50% 40% 57% 52% 52% 48% 48% 43% 39% 30% 30% 20% 22% 22% 22% 10% 0% 13% 9% 9% 4% 4%

Programmatic Picture Survey Categories with The Most Responses Bike Parking Bike Facility Striping TWE Signage/ Wayfinding Crosswalk Improvements Top TLCI Bicycle Recommendations Multiuse Path Bike Lanes Bike Parking Sharrows Wayfinding and Signage Top TLCI Pedestrian Recommendations Crosswalk Enhancements Benches Lighting Street Trees and Landscaping Top TLCI Transit Recommendations Transit Waiting Environment (TWE) New Bus Route New Station Wayfinding and Signage Transit Center

Budget Total budget for TLCI awards is set by Board Currently, $1 million per funding cycle Up to $500,ooo available for Implementation Grants Grant recipients are responsible for 20 percent local funding match 3 Program Focus Areas for Grants Bike and Pedestrian Safety Includes striping, crosswalks, traffic calming devices, etc. Street Furniture Includes bike parking, benches, trees, etc. Signing and Wayfinding

TLCI Implementation Grant Selection Process Preliminary project types based on: Analysis of completed TLCI studies Survey responses Partner feedback Pedestrian & Bicycle Safety Countermeasures restriping curb extension ladder crosswalk chicanes mini traffic circle raised crosswalk crossing island curb ramp Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacon bicycle signal pedestrian signals bike detection bike/ped counter bike rack bike locker bike corral bench Transit Waiting Environment lighting (safety) Street Furniture Signing & Wayfinding signed route signed/marked route marked route sign

Eligibility All local agencies in NOACA region Legal authority to sponsor a federal-aid capital improvement (ORS Chapter 5501.03 (d)) CDCs, non-profits and advocacy organizations must partner with eligible government entity with jurisdiction over proposed project

Implementation Grant Process Grant recipients are responsible for 20 percent local funding match NOACA will cover up to 80 percent of eligible costs NOACA will assist in the procurement of items NOACA and local partners will work together to install or construct projects NOACA staff will inspect installations to assure compliance with federal and state law

TLCI Implementation Grants Total TLCI Implementation Grants budget for FY 2016 is $525,000 million Received 29 implementation grant applications requesting more than $1.4 million in TLCI funding Projects are being evaluated by NOACA staff

Schedule Date (s) March 4, 6 and 9, 2015 April 9 May 8, 2015 May June 2015 May 15, 2015 June 19, 2015 July 10, 2015 September 11, 2015 Milestone NOACA staff and local agency workshops to develop TLCI Implementation Grant program Open Period for Applications Program Development and Recommendations with Local Partners Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Council discussion of Implementation Grant program Transportation Subcommittee discussion of Implementation Grant program Planning & Programming Committee discussion of Implementation Grant program Board awards TLCI Implementation Grants

Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Council May 15, 2015

Background Goal to increase bike/ped data collection Conduct 24 hour, week, month and year counts Volunteers cannot be utilized for long duration counts

Potential Count Locations Locations with likely bike traffic on daily basis year round: Edgehill Road (Cleveland/Cleveland Heights) Detroit-Superior Bridge Lorain-Carnegie Bridge Other locations identified by stakeholders: Towpath Trail near Harvard Lakefront Bikeway at Edgewater Detroit Bike Lane Superior Bike Lane

Permanent Counter Installation NOACA 2016 OWP budgeted $5,000 Costs of permanent counters range from $750 - $5,500 BPAC input on location (s) and types of counters

Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Council May 15, 2015

Background MPOs across the country have struggled incorporating safety into the planning process INVEST grant Used Kittelson & Associates, Inc. to analyze regional safety data

Regional Vision for Safety Part of the Regional Strategic Plan Connections+ 2035 Goal

The Problem US roads 2000 2009: 411,212 people killed Average of one person killed every 13 minutes.24/7 for 10 years straight Leading cause of accidental deaths Leading cause of all deaths, age 15 34 NOACA region roads 2012: 103 people killed, 17,000+ injured Societal costs of $1.5 Billion/year

The 5 E s Education EMS Enforcement Engineering Evaluation

What are the general patterns? Arterials are the major safety challenge in the region Aggressive Driving, lane departure, young driver and intersections are major factors to be addressed Higher VMTs = more serious crashes Streets with more lanes = higher serious crash rates, particularly for people walking Risk for people walking increases most after dark Street lighting is important for bikes and peds Pedestrian crashes In Cuyahoga County and Cleveland

Safety Characteristics that make urban streets safe for peds and bikes also make them safer for motorists. Low to moderate speeds Many street options (connectivity) Travel options less need to drive U.S.: High VMT + high speeds = high fatal rate (>40,000) Annual Fatals per 1M residents Sweden U.K. Germany France 59 61 80 101 E.U. avg (25) 103 U.S. 136 Sources: (FARS) Statistics 2006 USDOT Fatality Analysis Reporting System EU Road Federation - European Road Annual Fatals per 100M VMT Sweden U.K. Germany France 0.53 0.53 0.75 0.80 E.U. avg (25) 1.00 U.S. 1.36

What are we already doing? Building roadways to standards Standards aren t based on safety outcomes We ve been doing this 50+ years, It hasn t led to safer roads. Road Safety Assessments Safety as a criterion in all projects Projects are selected for other reasons (congestion, economic development, multimodal access) Safety hotspots are rarely addressed

What s next? Complete data-driven TSAP with recommendations to reduce fatal/serious injury crashes for all users Potential future policy changes Integrating safety into all of NOACA led planning activities Develop safety performance measures and targets Annual monitoring of safety performance Complete geographic/corridor analysis of crashes

Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Council May 15, 2015

Potential Dates and Locations Field trip to visit innovative bike/ped infrastructure in late July/early August Potential Locations?: Akron (South St. Cycletrack, Wayfinding, all pedestrian signal) Canton (Bike signals and green bicycle lane) South Euclid (Raised crosswalk) Metroparks (public bike stands) Lakewood (Bus stop bike parking, bike corral and signage) Shaker Heights Bike Boulevards Cleveland Heights (Edgehill and Mayfield Road uphill bike lanes) Cleveland (E. 72 nd buffered bike lanes, Puritas road diet, The Bike Rack, Lorain-Carnegie Bridge) Who to invite to participate?