Development of Guidelines for Bicycle Use of Controlled Access Facilities in Virginia

Similar documents
South Carolina Department of Transportation. Engineering Directive

Gordon Proctor Director Policy on Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel on ODOT Owned or Maintained Facilities

State Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Meeting. March 27, 2013 John Bolecek Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Planner

Act 47 Exception Application Process (Permitting Bicycle Travel on Freeways)

Traffic Engineering Update on Bike/Ped Topics. Marc Lipschultz, P.E. PTOE Central Office Traffic Engineering Division

Long Island Rail Road Expansion Project Floral Park to Hicksville

On Road Bikeways Part 1: Bicycle Lane Design

Fiscal Year 2017 Bicycle and Pedestrian Metric Report

VDOT BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE FOR LOCALITY INVOLVEMENT April 2017

Bicyclist Signing Guidelines

BIKE & PEDESTRIAN IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE FOR LOCALITY INVOLVEMENT. November 2006

Hampton Roads Pedestrian and Bicycle Advisory Committee

Who is Toole Design Group?

appendix b BLOS: Bicycle Level of Service B.1 Background B.2 Bicycle Level of Service Model Winston-Salem Urban Area

Access Management in the Vicinity of Intersections

Hampton Roads Pedestrian and Bicycle Advisory Committee

RURAL HIGHWAY SHOULDERS THAT ACCOMMODATE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN USE (TxDOT Project ) June 7, Presented by: Karen Dixon, Ph.D., P.E.

Peter Kremer, WSP/Parsons Brinckerhoff

General Design Factors

APPENDIX A(1) VDOT Complete Streets: Bicycle and Pedestrian Facility Guidelines, Bus Stop Design and Parking Guidelines

The 2012 AASHTO Bike Guide: An Overview

Construction Specifications Manual

Multimodal Design Guidance. October 23, 2018 ITE Fall Meeting

Multimodal Through Corridors and Placemaking Corridors

CE576: Highway Design and Traffic Safety

Guidelines for Integrating Safety and Cost-Effectiveness into Resurfacing, Restoration, and Rehabilitation Projects

Bikeway Plan for the Roanoke Valley Area MPO Update ACKWOWLEDGEMENTS

State Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Meeting Spring Meeting. April 22nd, 2015 John Bolecek Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Planner

Bicycling Routes on Provincial Roads Policy

Overview. Illinois Bike Summit IDOT Complete Streets Policy Presentation. What is a Complete Street? And why build them? And why build them?

FOR HISTORICAL REFERENCE ONLY

Guidance for Installation of Pedestrian Crosswalks on Michigan State Trunkline Highways

A Traffic Operations Method for Assessing Automobile and Bicycle Shared Roadways

Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Geometric Design Tables

Roadway Design Manual

Roundabouts: The Virginia Experience AASHTO SCOTE June 20, 2012

West Dimond Blvd Upgrade Jodhpur Street to Sand Lake Road

Clear Zone Conflicts in AASHTO Publications

Small Area Study U.S. Route 220 and VA Route 615 Intersection. Bath County, Virginia

Virginia Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee. Fall Meeting Minutes. October 26, Meeting start: 10:00 am. Meeting end: 2:00 pm

Connecting cyclists to work. Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council

Small Town & Rural Multimodal Networks

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. Non-NHS State Highways

Implementing Complete Streets in Ottawa. Project Delivery Process and Tools Complete Streets Forum 2015 October 1, 2015

Off-Road Facilities Part 1: Shared Use Path Design

Road Diets: Reconfiguring Streets for Multi-Modal Travel

900 BICYCLE FACILITIES Traffic Engineering Manual

City of Saline. Complete Streets Ordinance

INDOT Complete Streets Guideline & Policy

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. NHS Arterial (Non-Interstate)

FHWA Safety Performance for Intersection Control Evaluation (SPICE) Tool

Implementing Safety Performance Functions in Virginia. Part I : SPF Fundamentals BACKGROUND OUTLINE. BASICS: What? BASICS: When & How?

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Executive Summary

Access Management Regulations and Standards for Minor Arterials, Collectors, Local Streets

Bicycle and Pedestrian

Off-road Trails. Guidance

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

2018 AASHTO BIKE GUIDE

Brian D. Hare, P.E. Bureau of Design PennDOT PA APA Annual Conference Investing in a Sustainable Future October 5, 2009

Zlatko Krstulich, P.Eng. City of O9awa

MnDOT Implementation of Complete Streets Policy. January 2014

Programmatic Categorical Exclusion Update Question & Answers

APPENDIX B(2) MULTIMODAL DESIGN STANDARDS FOR MIXED-USE URBAN CENTERS

TRASBURG RANSPORTATION

Arterial Management Plan for US Route 250 and State Route 623

LANE ELIMINATION PROJECTS

DISTRICT BICYCLE PROGRAM

Chapter 4 On-Road Bikeways

GEOMETRIC DESIGN STANDARDS FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION STREETS TABLE 1A CG-6 CURB AND GUTTER SECTION

Transform 66 Project February 4, 2016 Partnering Conference Michigan Department of Transportation American Council of Engineering Companies

SECTION A-1-GEOMETRIC DESIGN STANDARDS

Florida s Intersection Safety Implementation Plan (ISIP)

THE FUTURE OF THE TxDOT ROADWAY DESIGN MANUAL

SECTION A-1-GEOMETRIC DESIGN STANDARDS

FOREWORD NOTICE PREFACE

IMPROVING PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AT UNCONTROLLED CROSSINGS. Guidelines for Marked Crosswalks

Developing a Regional Complete Streets Policy Statement for North Central Texas. Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee August 17, 2011

Lynchburg District Update

Appendix T CCMP TRAIL TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION DESIGN STANDARD

Annual Progress Report from VDOT on the Effect of the Aging Population on State Agencies

Evolving Roadway Design Policies for Walking and Bicycling

Development of Arlington County s Marked Crosswalk Guidelines. Jon Lawler, P.E. Design Engineer Arlington County, VA

APPENDIX L: COST ESTIMATING TOOLS

Chapter 7: Six-Step Implementation Process

FHWA Bikeway Selection Guide

AMATS Complete Streets Policy

Bike Planning: A New Day

CHAPTER 1 GENERAL DESIGN

Toward Zero Deaths. Regional SHSP Road Show Meeting. Virginia Strategic Highway Safety Plan. presented by

REVOCABLE PERMIT FOR STREET BANNER APPLICATION PACKAGE

Oregon Supplement to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Adopted July 2005 by OAR

Planning Guidance in the 2012 AASHTO Bike Guide

Roadway Classification Review

MAG Town of Cave Creek Bike Study Task 6 Executive Summary and Regional Significance Report

Incorporating Bicycle Networks into Resurfacing Projects

Geometric Design Strategic Research Program

NJDOT Complete Streets Checklist

Transcription:

Development of Guidelines for Bicycle Use of Controlled Access Facilities in Virginia VDOT Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Fall Working Group Meeting October 30, 2013 Young-Jun Kweon, Ph.D., P.E. Research Scientist

BACKGROUND The Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) adopted the Policy for Integrating Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodations in 2004. This policy was designed to ensure that bicycle and pedestrian needs are accommodated through VDOT s construction, operations, and maintenance programs. Problem: VDOT lacks objective criteria for recommending prohibition of bicycle use of state controlled access facilities. 11/12/2013 2

PURPOSE AND SCOPE Purpose is to develop a guide to help VDOT determine when the permission of bicycles on right oulders of controlled access facilities in Virginia is appropriate from a safety standpoint. Scope is limited to bicycle use on state controlled access highways. Scope does not include interstate highways or roads in incorporated cities or towns. Scope does not address secondary roads. 11/12/2013 3

CLIENT CTB Bicycle/Pedestrian Policy Implementation Team directed by the former Secretary of Transportation and the former VDOT Commissioner sought guidance for bicycle use of controlled access facilities. For this project, the client s interests were represented by the steering committee (next slide) 11/12/2013 4

STEERING COMMITTEE Current members Robin Grier (Chair), TMPD CO George Rogerson, L&D CO Michael Grey, Salem District Cindy Engelhart, Planning NOVA District David Dorfman, Civilian Bicyclist Former members Fatemeh Allahdoust, Planning NOVA District Jake Hembolt, formerly TMPD CO Mike Sawyer, formerly TED CO Travis Bridewell, formerly Richmond District 11/12/2013 5

METHOD 1. Data Collection: prohibition status, craes, geometry (e.g., paved right oulder width), traffic volume, and posted speed limit 2. Literature Review: federal and states guides and manuals 3. Database Development: primary highways only 4. Analysis: comparative analysis of review results, cra risk analysis, and stopping sight distance analysis 5. Guide Development 1) Start from two relevant tables in FHWA s 1994 report, Selecting Roadway Design Treatments to Accommodate Bicycles 2) Modify the tables through 9-step procedure devised based on analysis results 3) Add other considerations (e.g., civil rights consideration) 11/12/2013

PROPOSED GUIDE (1) 11/12/2013 7

PROPOSED GUIDE (2) 11/12/2013 8

PROPOSED GUIDE (3) 11/12/2013 9

QUESTIONS? 11/12/2013 10

APPENDIX 11/12/2013 11

9 Steps of Developing Minimum Shoulder Widths 1 Step 1: Start with Tables in FHWA s Bike Facility Design Guide The tables for Group A bicyclists in urban sections without street parking and in rural section in FHWA s Bike Design Guide (1994) were adopted as the initial oulder width tables. Speed categories below 45 mph were eliminated. Table B-1. Minimum Widths of Wide Curb or Shoulder for Group A Bicyclists in Urban Section Without Street Parking (feet) Average Average annual daily traffic volume (AADT) (vehicles per day) operating <2,000 2,000 10,000 >10,000 speed Stopping sight distance Stopping sight distance Stopping sight distance Adequate Inadequate Adequate Inadequate Adequate Inadequate Truck, bus, rv Truck, bus, rv Truck, bus, rv 45-50 mph wc 15 wc 15 wc 15 wc 15 wc 15 wc 15 wc 15 wc 15 >50 mph Note: wc=wide curb and =oulder Table B-2. Minimum Widths of a Shoulder for Group A Bicyclists in Rural Section (feet) Average Average annual daily traffic volume (AADT) (vehicles per day) operating <2,000 2,000 10,000 >10,000 speed Stopping sight distance Stopping sight distance Stopping sight distance Adequate Inadequate Adequate Inadequate Adequate Inadequate Truck, bus, rv Truck, bus, rv Truck, bus, rv 45-50 mph 4 4 4 4 >50 mph 4 4 Note: =oulder 11/12/2013 12

9 Steps of Developing Minimum Shoulder Widths 2 Step 2: Convert Wide Curb Widths to Comparable Shoulder Widths comparable oulder width = wide curb width typical lane width (12 feet) Table B-3. Minimum Widths of a Shoulder for Group A Bicyclists in Urban Section Without Street Parking (feet) Average Average annual daily traffic volume (AADT) (vehicles per day) operating <2,000 2,000 10,000 >10,000 speed Stopping sight distance Stopping sight distance Stopping sight distance Adequate Inadequate Adequate Inadequate Adequate Inadequate Truck, bus, rv Truck, bus, rv Truck, bus, rv 45-50 mph 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 >50 mph Note: =oulder 11/12/2013 13

9 Steps of Developing Minimum Shoulder Widths 3 Step 3: Modify Minimum Design Widths Suitable for Permission Guide The following considerations are made: The physical width of the bicyclist is 2.5 feet (i.e., 30 inches) (AASHTO, 1999). Tables B-1 and B-2 (thus, also Table B-3) were developed to aid in the design of bicycle facilities while the goal of this study is to develop guidance on conditions permitting bicyclists on oulders. Guidance for determining use of a facility is typically less stringent than guidance for the design of facility. Based on input from engineers, it was determined that a minimum oulder width of the design value minus 2 feet was sufficient for allowing bicycle use of oulders, with a minimum oulder width of 2.5 feet. modified oulder width = max[(minimum design oulder width 2 feet), 2.5 feet] 11/12/2013 14

9 Steps of Developing Minimum Shoulder Widths 4 Step 3: Modify Minimum Design Widths Suitable for Permission Guide modified oulder width = max[(minimum design oulder width 2 feet), 2.5 feet] Table B-4. Minimum Widths of Shoulder for Group A Bicyclists in Urban Section Without Street Parking (feet) Average Average annual daily traffic volume (AADT) (vehicles per day) operating <2,000 2,000 10,000 >10,000 speed Stopping sight distance Stopping sight distance Stopping sight distance Adequate Inadequate Adequate Inadequate Adequate Inadequate Truck, bus, rv Truck, bus, rv Truck, bus, rv 45-50 mph 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 4 4 2.5 2.5 4 4 >50 mph 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Table B-5. Minimum Widths of Shoulder for Group A Bicyclists in Rural Section (feet) Average Average annual daily traffic volume (AADT) (vehicles per day) operating <2,000 2,000 10,000 >10,000 speed Stopping sight distance Stopping sight distance Stopping sight distance Adequate Inadequate Adequate Inadequate Adequate Inadequate Truck, bus, rv Truck, bus, rv Truck, bus, rv 45-50 mph 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 >50 mph 2.5 4 4 2.5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 11/12/2013 15

9 Steps of Developing Minimum Shoulder Widths 5 Step 4: Compare Minimum Widths for Urban and Rural Sections and Select Larger of Two Widths Since there was no difference between urban and rural segments in the analysis of run-off-right craes, combining minimum widths for urban and rural sections is suggested. A larger width between the two tables is adopted for each cell to create a new table as follows: combined oulder width = max(width in Table B-4, width in Table B-5) Table B-. Minimum Widths of Shoulder for Group A Bicyclists (feet) Average Average annual daily traffic volume (AADT) (vehicles per day) operating <2,000 2,000 10,000 >10,000 speed Stopping sight distance Stopping sight distance Stopping sight distance Adequate Inadequate Adequate Inadequate Adequate Inadequate Truck, bus, rv Truck, bus, rv Truck, bus, rv 45-50 mph 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 >50 mph 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 11/12/2013 1

9 Steps of Developing Minimum Shoulder Widths Step 5: Calculate Minimum Shoulder Widths Maintaining Safe Separation Distance Due to Wind The following conditions are considered: Width of a truck=8.5 feet (102 inches) (FHWA, 2004) Essential operating space of a bicyclist=3.3 feet (40 inches) (AASHTO, 1999) Width of the outside lane=12 feet The following assumptions are made: An operating space of an 8.5-foot wide truck is 10 feet, 1 foot away from each end of a 12-foot lane. A bicyclist operates 1.5 feet from the edge of the pavement (1.5 feet is a half of the essential operating space [3.3 feet] of a bicyclist ). 11/12/2013 17

Lateral wind force on bicycle (lbs) 9 Steps of Developing Minimum Shoulder Widths 7 Step 5: Calculate Minimum Shoulder Widths Maintaining Safe Separation Distance Due to Wind Safe separation distances to address wind force caused by passing trucks are found from Figure 2, Aerodynamic forces caused by heavy vehicles passing bicycles (FHWA, 1977). The safe separation distances corresponding to different speeds are found as below; 2.5 feet at 45 mph 3.75 feet at 50 mph 5 feet at 55 mph feet at 0 mph.5 feet at 5 mph 10 8 Heavy vehicle speed=70 mph Estimated tolerance limit 4 0 mph 50 mph 2 40 mph 30 mph 0 0 2 4 8 10 12 Separation distance (ft) Source: A Bikeway Criteria Digest (FHWA, 1977) Figure 2. Aerodynamic forces caused by heavy vehicles passing bicycles 11/12/2013 18

9 Steps of Developing Minimum Shoulder Widths 8 Step 5: Calculate Minimum Shoulder Widths Maintaining Safe Separation Distance Due to Wind Minimum oulder widths required to maintain the safe separation distances while considering other relevant conditions and assumptions are calculated as follow: minimum oulder width for safe separation = safe separation distance (A) space between the right line of the lane and the right limit of a typical vehicle operating space (B) + space between a bicyclist and the edge of an pavement (C) Truck Operating Space (10 ft) 1 ft (B) 1.5 ft (C) Safe Separation Distance (A) Shoulder Width (A B+C) 11/12/2013 Lane Width (12 ft) 19 Figure B-2. Shoulder width calculation.

9 Steps of Developing Minimum Shoulder Widths 9 Step 5: Calculate Minimum Shoulder Widths Maintaining Safe Separation Distance Due to Wind The calculated minimum oulder widths for safe separation are: 3.15 feet (2.5 1.0 +1.5 ) at 45 mph 4.40 feet (3.75 1.0 +1.5 ) at 50 mph 5.5 feet (5.0 1.0 +1.5 ) at 55 mph.5 feet (.0 1.0 +1.5 ) at 0 mph 7.15 feet (.5 1.0 +1.5 ) at 5 mph Table B-7. Minimum Widths of Shoulder for Safe Separation Due to Wind (feet) Average Average annual daily traffic volume (AADT) (vehicles per day) operating <2,000 2,000 10,000 >10,000 speed Stopping sight distance Stopping sight distance Stopping sight distance Adequate Inadequate Adequate Inadequate Adequate Inadequate Truck, bus, rv Truck, bus, rv Truck, bus, rv 45 mph 3.15 3.15 3.15 3.15 3.15 3.15 3.15 3.15 3.15 3.15 3.15 3.15 4-50 mph 4.40 4.40 4.40 4.40 4.40 4.40 4.40 4.40 4.40 4.40 4.40 4.40 51-55 mph 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5-0 mph.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5 1-5 mph 7.15 7.15 7.15 7.15 7.15 7.15 7.15 7.15 7.15 7.15 7.15 7.15 11/12/2013 20

9 Steps of Developing Minimum Shoulder Widths 10 Step : Compare Tables B- and B-7 Generated in Steps 4 and 5 In order to satisfy all the conditions and assumptions considered through Step 5, the larger of the two values (Tables B- vs. B-7) is adopted: combined oulder width = max(width in Table B-, width in Table B-7) Table B-8. Minimum Widths of Shoulder for Bicyclists (feet) Average Average annual daily traffic volume (AADT) (vehicles per day) operating <2,000 2,000 10,000 >10,000 speed Stopping sight distance Stopping sight distance Stopping sight distance Adequate Inadequate Adequate Inadequate Adequate Inadequate Truck, bus, rv Truck, bus, rv Truck, bus, rv 45 mph 3.15 3.15 3.15 3.15 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4-50 mph 4.40 4.40 4.40 4.40 4.40 4.40 4.40 4.40 4.40 4.40 4.40 4.40 51-55 mph 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5-0 mph.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5 1-5 mph 7.15 7.15 7.15 7.15 7.15 7.15 7.15 7.15 7.15 7.15 7.15 7.15 11/12/2013 21

9 Steps of Developing Minimum Shoulder Widths 11 Step 7: Use Posted Speed Limits For practical use of the table, a posted speed limit is recommended for use in place of the average operating speed because operating speed data are typically unavailable for highway segments. However, when operating speeds are thought to be higher than the posted speed limit, speed data ould be collected and an average operating speed ould be used in place of the posted speed limit. Table B-9. Minimum Widths of Shoulder for Bicyclists (feet) Posted Average annual daily traffic volume (AADT) (vehicles per day) speed <2,000 2,000 10,000 >10,000 limit Stopping sight distance Stopping sight distance Stopping sight distance Adequate Inadequate Adequate Inadequate Adequate Inadequate Truck, bus, rv Truck, bus, rv Truck, bus, rv 45 mph 3.15 3.15 3.15 3.15 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 50 mph 4.40 4.40 4.40 4.40 4.40 4.40 4.40 4.40 4.40 4.40 4.40 4.40 55 mph 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 0 mph.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5 5 mph 7.15 7.15 7.15 7.15 7.15 7.15 7.15 7.15 7.15 7.15 7.15 7.15 11/12/2013 22

9 Steps of Developing Minimum Shoulder Widths 12 Step 8: Round Values for Practical Use For practical use of the table, values in Table B-9 are rounded so that widths are based on 0.5 feet increments. All values are rounded to the nearest 0.5 ft. Table B-10. Minimum Widths of Shoulder for Bicyclists (feet) Posted Average annual daily traffic volume (AADT) (vehicles per day) speed <2,000 2,000 12,000 >12,000 limit Stopping sight distance Stopping sight distance Stopping sight distance Adequate Inadequate Adequate Inadequate Adequate Inadequate Truck, bus, rv Truck, bus, rv Truck, bus, rv 45 mph 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 50 mph 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 55 mph 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 0 mph.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5 5 mph 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 11/12/2013 23

9 Steps of Developing Minimum Shoulder Widths 13 Step 9: Combine Two Higher Volume Categories All the widths for two higher AADT categories, 2,000-10,000 and >10,000, are identical. Thus, for simplicity, the two categories are combined so that the final table has two volume categories, <2,000 and 2,000. Table B-11. Minimum Widths of Shoulder for Bicyclists (feet) Posted speed Average annual daily traffic volume (AADT) (vehicles per day) limit <2,000 2,000 Stopping sight distance Stopping sight distance Adequate Inadequate Adequate Inadequate Truck, bus, rv Truck, bus, rv 45 mph 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 50 mph 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 55 mph 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 0 mph.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5 5 mph 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Table B-12. Minimum Widths of Shoulder for Bicyclists Posted speed Average annual daily traffic volume (AADT) (vehicles per day) limit <2,000 2,000 45 mph 3 ft 4 ft 50 mph 4.5 ft 55 mph 5.5 ft 0 mph.5 ft 5 mph 7 ft 11/12/2013 24