Similar documents
INTERSECTION WITH RIGHT TURN TAPER

FREEWAY AND SERVICE ROAD CONNECTIONS

FOR LOOP RAMPS-TAPERED DECELERATION LANE

ARLINGTON COUNTY PAVEMENT MARKING SPECIFICATIONS

CHAPTER 1 STANDARD PRACTICES

SIGN PLACEMENT-ELEVATION VIEW: FREEWAY (FORESLOPE) ROADSIDE SIGN LOCATIONS & SUPPORT SPACING MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (MIN.

Figure 3B-1. Examples of Two-Lane, Two-Way Marking Applications

Updated There is no park access points beyond the limit of the phase I work. roadway to be constructed Viewport has been along full limits of the park

FREEWAY, WEAVING LANE, AND SERVICE ROAD CONNECTIONS

CHAPTER 6H. TYPICAL APPLICATIONS

Including Revision 1 dated May 2012 and Revision 2 dated May 2012

Appendix Work Zone Traffic Control

Updated There is no park access roadway to be constructed points beyond the limit of along full limits of the park's the phase I work. Phase 1. Revise

PERMANENT PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN

CHAPTER 6H. TYPICAL APPLICATIONS

CW20-1D 48" X 48" (Flags- See note 1) G " X 24" (See note 2)

Homework Module 7.01 Drivers Manual Study Questions

CHAPTER 3A. GENERAL PAGE CHAPTER 3B. PAVEMENT AND CURB MARKINGS PAGE

Developed by: The American Traffic Safety Services Association (ATSSA) 15 Riverside Parkway, Suite 100 Fredericksburg, VA

ATTACHMENT NO. 11. RRLRT No. 2. Railroad / Light Rail Transit Technical Committee TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Busway Grade Crossings STATUS/DATE OF ACTION

PERMANENT PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN

City of Albert Lea Policy and Procedure Manual 4.10 ALBERT LEA CROSSWALK POLICY

PERMANENT PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN

Designing for Pedestrian Safety. Alabama Department of Transportation Pre-Construction Conference May 2016

TRAFFIC LINE MANUAL Edition Revision 1 June 2012 TRAFFIC-ROADWAY SECTION

STREET and UTILITY REPAIRS WORK AREA PROTECTION GUIDE

General References Definitions. (1) Design Guidance. (2) Supporting Information

TRAFFIC LINE MANUAL. June 2011 TRAFFIC-ROADWAY SECTION

Section 3A.04 Colors. Section 3B.10 Approach Markings for Obstructions

Attachment No. 4 Approved by National Committee Council

City of Margate, Florida. Neighborhood Traffic Management Manual

Oregon Supplement to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Adopted July 2005 by OAR

Chapter V TRAFFIC CONTROLS. Tewodros N.

Identify the letter of the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

Sign Design Manual (TEM 295-2)

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE TRAFFIC CODE UPDATE MASTER RECOMMENDATION REPORT: 9.14, 9.16, 9.18

RE: 2007 NPA Text (Clean Version)

CHAPTER 2G. PREFERENTIAL AND MANAGED LANE SIGNS

Cycle Track Design Best Practices Cycle Track Sections

TURN ARROW. LANE-REDUCTION ARROW (RIGHT) (For Left Lane, Use Mirror Image) LANE-REDUCTION ARROW MARKING DETAIL

RAILROAD CROSSING AT TWO LANE ROADWAY

Tract or Parcel Project Name PCN Checked By Date

Traffic Signs and Signals

Attachment No. 13. National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices RWSTC RECOMMENDATION FOLLOWING SPONSOR COMMENTS

Traffic Signs and Markings. Instructor: Dr. Yahya Sarraj Associate Prof. Of Transportation

PART 9. TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR BICYCLE FACILITIES TABLE OF CONTENTS

Traffic Control Devices

Guidance for Installation of Pedestrian Crosswalks on Michigan State Trunkline Highways

The 2009 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) (Brief) Highlights for Arizona Practitioners. Arizona Department of Transportation

MEMORANDUM. Date: 9/13/2016. Citywide Crosswalk Policy

SECTION 12 ROAD MARKINGS AND DELINEATION

(This page left intentionally blank)

MEMORANDUM TERESA MCCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF RESTRICTING PARKING ADJACENT TO 170 AND 171 BRISCO ROAD

Pavement Markings (1 of 3)

Multimodal Design Guidance. October 23, 2018 ITE Fall Meeting

An Overview of the 2009 MUTCD

ADDENDUM NUMBER ONE (1) For

Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons

Addendum to SDDCTEA Pamphlet 55 17: Better Military Traffic Engineering Revision 1 Effective: 24 Aug Crosswalk Guidelines

2009 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

Video Review: Signs, Signals and Markings Video Review 4.1

Name Roads Station Distance Miles

Edge Wedge 150 lb/ft 3

CHAPTER 2: SIGNALS, SIGNS AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS

USER GUIDE FOR R1-6 GATEWAY TREATMENT

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

Lesson #7. Review: Lesson #6 Destination: Eureka. SKILLS A. Protected Left Turns

USER GUIDE FOR R1-6 GATEWAY TREATMENT

APPENDIX F DESIGN STANDARDS REVIEW SUMMARIES AND REDLINES

Pedestrians and Bicyclists. Bruce Friedman and Scott Wainwright FHWA MUTCD Team

Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

2017 Changes to the 2011 MMUTCD January 2017

BI-DIRECTIONALS FREE-ACCESS

TRANSMITTAL LETTER. Revision to Publication 149, Chapter 20 (Criteria for the Design of Traffic Signal Supports) - March 2009 Edition

Ottawa Beach Road Study

PERMANENT PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN

Appendix A-6. Signing and Marking Guidelines. Number Name Pages. 2B.06 Signing at T Intersections 1. 2B.12 Pedestrians in Crosswalk 1

NCUTCD Proposal for Changes to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

Signs. signs, signals and road markings. in this chapter

Ohio Department of Transportation Edition of the OMUTCD It s Here!

Driveway Design Criteria

BLUETT TRAFFIC CALMING ON-SITE MEETING #2 DISCUSSION SUMMARY

CONSTRUCTION ENCROACHMENT PERMIT APPLICATION AND PROCESSING INSTRUCTIONS

INTERSECTIONS AT GRADE INTERSECTIONS

National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices RWSTC RECOMMENDATION FOLLOWING SPONSOR COMMENTS

REVISION 2 VIRGINIA WORK AREA PROTECTION MANUAL. Ginger Quinn & Paul Kelley April 11, 2018

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

2003 Edition Page 2B-1

Chapter 2B. REGULATORY SIGNS

Section 9A.07 Meaning of Standard, Guidance, Option, and Support

Controlled. Semi-Controlled PAGE 01 CHAPTER 12 INTERSECTIONS

1. Places where one road meets or crosses another are called intersections. F

Road Markings. Lecture Notes in Transportation Systems Engineering. Prof. Tom V. Mathew. 1 Overview 1. 2 Classification 2

Fundamentals of Traffic Control Devices

Presented By: Jim Roth, P.E. Signing Engineer Office of Traffic Engineering Ohio Department of Transportation 1980 West Broad Street Columbus, Ohio

REVOCABLE PERMIT FOR STREET BANNER APPLICATION PACKAGE

November 2012: The following Traffic and Safety Notes were revised:

California DMV Test. Mark the correct answers

Page 1 of KA

Transcription:

NO PARKING ZONE, YELLOW CURB (OPTIONAL) Z 8 20 MIN. 8 Z (SEE SHEET 2) 4" WHITE "X" (TYP.),(OPTIONAL) TYPE I NO PARKING ZONE, YELLOW CURB (OPTIONAL) Z 8 20 20 ALL SPACES 22 MIN., 26 MAX. EACH Z TYPE II NO PARKING ZONE, YELLOW CURB (OPTIONAL) Z 20 28" 8 Z 12" EXTENSION (TYP.) ENABLES DRIVERS TO SEE LIMITS OF STALL ALL SPACES 22 MIN. 26 MAX. 20 TYPE III DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR Kirk T. Steudle MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BUREAU OF HIGHWAY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR Michigan Department of Transportation PREPARED BY DESIGN DIVISION APPROVED BY: DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF FIELD SERVICES ON-STREET PARKING ZONE MARKINGS DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: LMF JGM APPROVED BY: DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF HIGHWAY DEVELOPMENT 01/20/12 F.H.W.A. APPROVAL 10/18/11 PLAN DATE PAVE-955-B SHEET 1 OF2

ACCESSIBLE RAMP 4" WHITE 2 MIN. RESERVED PARKING ONLY 2 MIN. R7-8 SIGN (R7-8P FOR VAN ACCESSIBLE) 4" WHITE ACCESSIBLE RAMP SIDEWALK 8 _ 4" WHITE 4" WHITE (TYP.) 22 MIN. 26 MAX. (TYP) OPTIONAL ACCESSIBLE PAVEMENT MARKING SYMBOL (SEE PAVE-956) 4" WHITE "X" (OPTIONAL) ACCESSIBLE MARKINGS INTERSECTION TYPE NO TRAFFIC CONTROL NO CROSSWALK NO TRAFFIC CONTROL WITH CROSSWALK TRAFFIC CONTROL PRESENT "Z"(FT) 15 20 30 SEE SECTION 257.674 OF THE MICHIGAN VEHICLE CODE FOR MORE INFORMATION. NOTES: 1. All parking zone markings shall be 4 inch white. 4 inch blue may supplement the white zone marking for an accessible stall. 2. For mid-block driveway, clearance from parking stall to the curb cut shall be 20 ft minimum. 3. The use of a yellow (or other color) painted curb to denote a no parking zone is optional, and shall only be used to supplement standard signs. 4. On-street parking for state trunk lines through municipalities shall be one of the three types illustrated. 5. Type II on-street parking zone markings shown this sheet, Type I or III may also be used. NOT TO SCALE MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BUREAU OF HIGHWAY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN 01/20/12 F.H.W.A. APPROVAL 10/18/11 PLAN DATE PAVE-955-B SHEET 2 OF2 NOTE: THE ORIGINAL SIGNED COPY IS KEPT ON FILE AT THE MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.

YIELD YIELD SCHOOL SCHOOL SCHOOL LEGEND (TYP.) W16-9P AHEAD (SEE PAVE-900 SHEET 1) S1-1 4" WHITE BROKEN LINE (TYP.) 4" DOUBLE YELLOW (TYP.) SPECIAL EMPHASIS CROSSWALK 24" WHITE STOP BAR (TYP.) (TO BE LOCATED 40-150 FROM THE SIGNAL HEAD) 6 MIN. S1-1 AHEAD W16-9P SCHOOL SCHOOL MID-BLOCK SIGNALIZED SCHOOL CROSSING W16-9P AHEAD SCHOOL LEGEND (TYP.) (SEE PAVE-900 SHEET 1) SCHOOL SCHOOL SCHOOL LEGEND (TYP.) (SEE PAVE-900 SHEET 1) S1-1 AHEAD R1-5 W16-7P W16-9P SCHOOL S1-1 4" WHITE BROKEN LINE (TYP.) S1-1 6 MIN. 6 MIN. S1-1 W16-7P SPECIAL EMPHASIS CROSSWALK S1-1 SPECIAL EMPHASIS CROSSWALK W16-7P 4" DOUBLE YELLOW (TYP.) R1-5 4" YELLOW BROKEN LINE (TYP.) (SEE NOTE 3, SHEET 2) SCHOOL AHEAD S1-1 W16-9P SCHOOL SCHOOL AHEAD S1-1 W16-9P NON-SIGNALIZED SCHOOL CROSSING NON-SIGNALIZED SCHOOL CROSSING DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR Kirk T. Steudle MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BUREAU OF HIGHWAY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR Michigan Department of Transportation PREPARED BY APPROVED BY: DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF FIELD SERVICES SCHOOL MARKINGS DESIGN DIVISION DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: LMF JGM APPROVED BY: DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF HIGHWAY DEVELOPMENT 01/20/12 F.H.W.A. APPROVAL 10/18/11 PLAN DATE PAVE-960-B SHEET 1 OF2

SINGLE LANE APPROACH MULTI LANE APPROACH C L C L SCHOOL 9-8" 8 SCHOOL SCHOOL 9-8" 9-8" 8 NOTES: 1. Place 9 ft 8 inch SCHOOL marking for each lane. Omit legend in left turn or exclusive right turn lanes. 2. Pavement marking should not extend over into opposing lane. 3. Pavement lane line markings (passing, no passing zone) per existing markings or as directed by the Engineer. 4. Refer to PAVE-945 for stop bar, crosswalk and yield line marking details. NOT TO SCALE MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BUREAU OF HIGHWAY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN 01/20/12 F.H.W.A. APPROVAL 10/18/11 PLAN DATE PAVE-960-B SHEET 2 OF2 NOTE: THE ORIGINAL SIGNED COPY IS KEPT ON FILE AT THE MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.

6"SOLID WHITE "Z" "Z" 45^ 12" 6"SOLID WHITE REDUCTION W4-2R (BOTH SIDES) LANE ENDS MERGE LEFT W9-2 (RIGHT SIDE) D D D/4 MERGE MERGE MEDIAN 6" WHITE EDGE LINE ARROW AND MERGE 4" DOUBLE 6" YELLOW EDGE LINE LEGEND (OPTIONAL) SOLID YELLOW TAPER LANE ADDITION 6" WHITE EDGE LINE 4" BROKEN WHITE LINE D = ADVANCE WARNING DISTANCE (REFER TO TABLE 2C-4 OF MMUTCD FOR D VALUES) FOR "Y" VALUES SEE PAVE-945 SHEET 1 12" SOLID YELLOW 45^ PAVEMENT WIDTH REDUCTION CROSS-HATCH SPACING DOUBLE 4" SOLID YELLOW (TYP.) SEPARATOR "Y" POSTED SPEED LIMIT (MPH) 25 OR LESS 3O 35 4O 45 5O 55 "Z" (FT) 10 20 20 40 40 60 60 DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR Kirk T. Steudle MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BUREAU OF HIGHWAY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR Michigan Department of Transportation 2-LANE TO 4- LANE PREPARED BY DESIGN DIVISION APPROVED BY: DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF FIELD SERVICES TRANSITION PAVEMENT MARKINGS DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: LMF JGM APPROVED BY: DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF HIGHWAY DEVELOPMENT 01/20/12 F.H.W.A. APPROVAL 10/18/11 PLAN DATE PAVE-970-B SHEET 1 OF1