MAE 322 Machine Design Lecture 5 Fatigue - 2. Dr. Hodge Jenkins Mercer University

Similar documents
J. J. Daly Metal Improvement Company Paramus New Jersey USA

STRESS ANALYSIS OF BICYCLE PADDLE AND OPTIMIZED BY FINITE ELEMENT METHOD. S. Abeygunasekara 1, T. M. M. Amarasekara 2

Stress evaluation of a bicycle crank arm connection using BEM

ME311 Machine Design

Batch centrifuge basket design.

P-04 Stainless Steel Corrugated Hoses and Metal Bellows Expansion Joints

Fatigue Analysis of English-Willow Cricket Bat

A hose layline contains important information for specifying the replacement assembly: manufacturer, hose trade name, working pressure and hose ID.

ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF PIPELINE BUCKLES

Methodology for Translating Single- Tooth Bending Fatigue Data to be Comparable to Running Gear Data

EEF. Fatigue Testing Unit PROCESS DIAGRAM AND UNIT ELEMENTS ALLOCATION. Engineering and Technical Teaching Equipment

Rudder Investigation. By Harish M

Fatigue Resistant Sockets for Dynamic Loads PFEIFER Cable Structures. Cable structures technology Info Nr PFEIFER SEIL- UND HEBETECHNIK GMBH

FEA case Study: Rubber expansion joint for piping systems

Combined Wave and Wind Fatigue Damage for Offshore Structures

Fatigue Life Evaluation of Cross Tubes of Helicopter Skid Landing Gear System

Lifecycle Performance of Escape Systems

Sense Element Pump Ripple Fatigue

Vessels subject to External Pressure

A New Test Setup for Testing Polyethylene Tubes under Constant and Cyclic Internal Pressures

VI Classifications of Weldments

Micro Channel Recuperator for a Reverse Brayton Cycle Cryocooler

Using Experimental Procedure to Improve the Efficiency of the Two Stand Reversing Cold Mill

Impact Test Equipment Ltd & User Guide. User Guide

ENGINEERING DESIGN GUIDE. D-M-E Hydraulic Unscrewing Device

DESIGN OPTIMIZATION OF WORK ROLL CHOCK AND BACKUP ROLL CHOCK IN COLD ROLLING MILL

FATIGUE ASSESSMENT OF OFFSHORE STRUCTURES

computed using Equation 3-18 by setting the 2nd term equal to 0 and K A equal to K o and using the pressure distribution as shown in Figure 3-23.

Reliability Analysis of the LabTecta Bearing Protector

ASSESSING THE RELIABILITY OF FAIL-SAFE STRUCTURES INTRODUCTION

EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF SELECTED TAKRAW BALLS IN MALAYSIA

Calibration and Validation of the Shell Fatigue Model Using AC10 and AC14 Dense Graded Hot Mix Asphalt Fatigue Laboratory Data

ABS TECHNICAL PAPERS 2005

Fatigue Test Results and Analysis 42 Piston Provost Wings

L-header Testing, Evaluation and Design Methodology

Numerical Simulations of a Train of Air Bubbles Rising Through Stagnant Water

CONVECTION SECTION FAILURE ANALYSIS AND FITNESS-FOR-SERVICE ASSESSMENT

LOW-CYCLE FATIGUE LIFE OF AW 1050 ALUMINIUM ALLOY FSW AND TIG WELDED JOINTS

Table NC (e)-1 Stress Range Reduction Factors

IGEM/TD/1. Background, Development, Changes J V Haswell

OPERATION AND INSTRUCTION MANUAL Flat Roof Anchor Model: FRA250L-10X-CTS

Shear Strength Assessment of Ship Hulls Alice Mathai, Alice T.V., Ancy Joseph

Engineering Practice on Ice Propeller Strength Assessment Based on IACS Polar Ice Rule URI3

Mathematics Assessment Program. Middle School Mathematics. Time Allowed Section A - 40 minutes; Section B - 40 minutes

The Use of ILI In Dent Assessments

Product Specification Spring Finger

A FINITE ELEMENT PROCEDURE TO MODEL THE EFFECT OF HYDROSTATIC TESTING ON SUBSEQUENT FATIGUE CRACK GROWTH

Applied Fluid Mechanics

Fig. 1. Test in pool.

Use equation for the cylindrical section and equation or for the ends.

OPERATION AND INSTRUCTION MANUAL Swivel Anchor Model: SWY100N

OPERATION AND INSTRUCTION MANUAL Swivel Anchor Model: HD26248

FATIGUE, FAIL-SAFE, AND DAMAGE TOLERANCE EVALUATION OF METALLIC STRUCTURE FOR NORMAL, UTILITY, ACROBATIC, AND COMMUTER CATEGORY AIRPLANES

Risk-Based Condition Assessment and Maintenance Engineering for Aging Aircraft Structure Components

INSTRUMENTATION TUBING

Moyno ERT Power Sections. Operational Guidelines

Kiefner & Associates, Inc.

SHEAR PERFORMANCE OF RC FOOTING BEAMS BY CAP-TIE SYSTEM USING WELDED STIRRUPS

New Techniques for Recording Data from an Operating Scotch Yoke Mechanism

High Pressure Equipment Taper Seal Valves, Fittings and Tubing

Technical Data Sheet TI-F50 Locking Units series KFH

Design and Safety Document for the Vacuum Windows of the NPDGamma Liquid Hydrogen Target at SNS

API 618 Forced Response Studies by Brian Howes, Derrick Derksen, Kelly Eberle

Analysis of Shear Lag in Steel Angle Connectors

(DD/MMM/YYYY): 10/01/2013 IP

Development of TEU Type Mega Container Carrier

The Use of BS 5400: Part 10: Code of Practice for Fatigue

Justification of Risk Reduction through In-Service Inspection / REDUCE

Morgan DeLuca 11/2/2012

Two-way Fluid Structure Interaction (FSI) Analysis on the Suction Valve Dynamics of a Hermetic Reciprocating Compressor

JAPANESE PD EXAMINATIONS FOR DEPTH SIZING OF SCC IN AUSTENITIC STAINLESS STEEL PIPES FROM 2006 TO 2012

METHODOLOGY FOR ASSESSING THE EFFECTS OF PLAIN DENTS, WRINKLE BENDS, AND MECHANICAL DAMAGE ON PIPELINE INTEGRITY

Coke drum Monitoring & Inspection for Fatigue Life and Safety Improvement

The Industrial Accident Resulted from the Failure of Bolt

Water Balance Indexes Revised September 2017

SUPER SLIDER BEAM ANCHOR ADJUSTABLE FROM Model # BWA030N

2001 AASHTO Training Manual

Translation of the original Operating Instructions for HKS rubber compensators

A simple method for determining the true specific fracture energy of concrete

DNVGL-CP-0187 Edition March 2016

OPERATION AND INSTRUCTION MANUAL

Берг АБ Тел. (495) , факс (495) Turning Ideas Into Engineered Solutions KAYDON RING & SEAL, INC.

RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT, STATIC AND DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF TRANSMISSION LINE TOWER: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

CFD Simulation and Experimental Validation of a Diaphragm Pressure Wave Generator

April 22nd to 25th, 2012

IAC WORKMAN 30FT SELF RETRACTING LANYARD

Tank Tie off Report for Pipes Albuquerque 1/3

Technical Standards and Legislation: Risk Based Inspection. Presenter: Pierre Swart

PRODUCT SPECIFICATION. SFP+ Cage and Cage Assembly 1 of 8 A

EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS OF GUIDED WAVE TRAVEL TIME TOMOGRAPHY

5.1 Introduction. Learning Objectives

WELCOME to CAUx Local India 2018

COMPUTATIONAL FLOW MODEL OF WESTFALL'S LEADING TAB FLOW CONDITIONER AGM-09-R-08 Rev. B. By Kimbal A. Hall, PE

TECH TIPS: ROPE DEFECTS

G238. G238 Family 3 & 4 Point Bend Fixtures Modular & Configurable. Features

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. PIPELINE INTEGRITY AXIAL CRACK THREAT ASSESSMENT

Research on Shear Test methods of bonded steel bolts

Wind Action Effects on Mixed Reinforced Concrete Structures in Non Seismic Zones

Blast Damage Consideratons for Horizontal Pressure Vessel and Potential for Domino Effects

Evaluation of Friction Stir Weld Process and Properties for Aircraft Application

Transcription:

MAE 322 Machine Design Lecture 5 Fatigue - 2 Dr. Hodge Jenkins Mercer University

Returning to Stress-Life Fatigue Modeling Fatigue Stress-Life: S f -N Diagram for steels Stress levels below S e (Endurance Strength) predict infinite life Between 10 3 and 10 6 cycles, finite life is predicted Below 10 3 cycles is known as low cycle, S UT S f S e Fig. 6 10

Equations for S-N Diagram Write equation for S-N line from 10 3 to 10 6 cycles Two known points At N =10 3 cycles, S f = f S ut At N =10 6 cycles, S f = S e Equations for line: Fig. 6 10

Equations for S-N Diagram If a completely reversed stress s rev is given, setting S f = s rev in Eq. (6 13) and solving for N (cycles to failure) gives, Note that the typical S-N diagram is only applicable for completely reversed stresses For other stress situations, a completely reversed stress with the same life expectancy must be used on the S-N diagram

Low-cycle Fatigue Low-cycle fatigue is defined for fatigue failures in the range 1 N 10 3 On the idealized S-N diagram on a log-log scale, failure is predicted by a straight line between two points (10 3, f S ut ) and (1, S ut )

Example 6 2

Fatigue Strength Fraction f Plot Eq. (6 10) for the fatigue strength fraction f of S ut at 10 3 cycles Use f from plot for S' f = f S ut at 10 3 cycles on S-N diagram Assumes S e = S' e = 0.5S ut at 10 6 cycles Fig. 6 18

Example 6 2 (continued)

Endurance Limit Modifying Factors Endurance limit S' e is for carefully prepared and tested specimen If warranted, S e obtained from testing of actual parts When testing of actual parts is not practical, a set of Marin factors are used to adjust the endurance limit

Surface Factor k a Stresses tend to be high at the surface Surface finish has an impact on initiation of cracks at localized stress concentrations Surface factor is a function of ultimate strength. Higher strengths are more sensitive to rough surfaces.

Example 6 3

Size Factor k b Larger parts have greater surface area at high stress levels Likelihood of crack initiation is higher Size factor is obtained from experimental data with wide scatter For bending and torsion loads, the trend of the size factor data is given by Applies only for round, rotating diameter For axial load, there is no size effect, so k b = 1

Size Factor k b For parts that are not round and rotating, an equivalent round rotating diameter is obtained. Equate the volume of material stressed at and above 95% of the maximum stress to the same volume in the rotating-beam specimen. Lengths cancel, so equate the areas. For a rotating round section, the 95% stress area is the area of a ring, Equate 95% stress area for other conditions to Eq. (6 22) and solve for d as the equivalent round rotating diameter

For non-rotating round, Size Factor k b Equating to Eq. (6-22) and solving for equivalent diameter, Similarly, for rectangular section h x b, A 95s = 0.05 hb. Equating to Eq. (6 22), Other common cross sections are given in Table 6 3

Size Factor k b Table 6 3 A 95s for common non-rotating structural shapes

Example 6 4

Loading Factor k c Accounts for changes in endurance limit for different types of fatigue loading. Only to be used for single load types. Use Combination Loading method (Sec. 6 14) when more than one load type is present.

Temperature Factor k d Endurance limit appears to maintain same relation to ultimate strength for elevated temperatures as at room temperature This relation is summarized in Table 6 4

Temperature Factor k d If ultimate strength is known for operating temperature, then just use that strength. Let k d = 1 and proceed as usual. If ultimate strength is known only at room temperature, then use Table 6 4 to estimate ultimate strength at operating temperature. With that strength, let k d = 1 and proceed as usual. Alternatively, use ultimate strength at room temperature and apply temperature factor from Table 6 4 to the endurance limit. A fourth-order polynomial curve fit of the underlying data of Table 6 4 can be used in place of the table, if desired.

Example 6 5

Example 6 5 (continued)

Reliability Factor k e From Fig. 6 17, S' e = 0.5 S ut is typical of the data and represents 50% reliability. Reliability factor adjusts to other reliabilities. Only adjusts Fig. 6 17 assumption. Does not imply overall reliability. Fig. 6 17

Reliability Factor k e Simply obtain k e for desired reliability from Table 6 5. Table 6 5

Miscellaneous-Effects Factor k f Reminder to consider other possible factors. Residual stresses Directional characteristics from cold working Case hardening Corrosion Surface conditioning, e.g. electrolytic plating and metal spraying Cyclic Frequency Frettage Corrosion Limited data is available. May require research or testing.

Stress Concentration and Notch Sensitivity For dynamic loading, stress concentration effects must be applied. Obtain K t as usual (e.g. Appendix A 15) For fatigue, some materials are not fully sensitive to K t so a reduced value can be used. Define K f as the fatigue stress-concentration factor. Define q as notch sensitivity, ranging from 0 (not sensitive) to 1 (fully sensitive). For q = 0, K f = 1 For q = 1, K f = K t

DO NOT CONFUSE k f and K f Miscellaneous-Effects Factor, k f :modifies strength, a material property, with K f is the fatigue stress-concentration factor :modifies nominal stress for effects of discontinuities