Listed species under the jurisdiction of NOAA Fisheries that occur in the geographic area of responsibility of the Wilmington District are:

Similar documents
Information To Assist In Compliance With Nationwide Permit General Condition 18, Endangered Species

Living Beaches: Integrating The Ecological Function Of Beaches Into Coastal Engineering Projects and Beach Management

Endangered Species Act and FERC Hydroelectric Projects. Jeff Murphy & Julie Crocker NHA New England Meeting November 16, 2010

AOGA EDUCATIONAL SEMINAR. Endangered Species Act

AOGA Educational Seminar

Endangered Species Act Application in New York State What s New? October 4, 2015 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Robyn A. Niver

Endangered Species on Ranches. Nebraska Grazing Conference August 14 15, 2012

Proposed Terrestrial Critical Habitat for the Northwest Atlantic Loggerhead Sea Turtle Population. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Presented by: Barbara A. Brenner Stoel Rives LLP. Bakersfield Association of Professional Landmen May 10, 2011

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Endangered Species Act of 1973

endangered species act A Reference Guide August 2013 United States marine corps

Atlantic Sturgeon Update NER Protected Resources

DIVISION 100 WILDLIFE DIVERSITY PLAN

Overview of Federal and State Wildlife Regulations

Santa Clara Valley Habitat Conservation Plan/ Natural Community Conservation Plan

Environmental Law and Policy Salzman & Thompson

[Docket No. FWS HQ IA ; FXIA FF09A30000] Endangered Species; Marine Mammals; Receipt of Applications for Permit

Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation - Biological Opinion

Appendix C - Guidance for Integrating EFH Consultations with Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultations

National Report on Large Whale Entanglements

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Faster, better, cheaper: Transgenic Salmon. How the Endangered Species Act applies to genetically

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SOUTHERN DIVISION No. 7:10-CV-32

Agenda Item 7.1 For Information. Council CNL(10)24. Annual Report on Actions Taken Under Implementation Plans USA

Atlantic Sturgeon Workshop

Bill Hanson US Fish & Wildlife Service

FOREST SERVICE MANUAL NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC

Frequently Asked Questions About Revised Critical Habitat and Economic Analysis for the Endangered Arroyo Toad

Re: Unauthorized incidental take of Florida panther due to Lee County excavation activities and associated increases in traffic volume

Essential Fish Habitat Consultation

ATLANTIC STURGEON. Consultations on listing under the Species at Risk Act

Critical Habitat for Atlantic Sturgeon

[Docket No. FWS HQ IA ; FXIA FF09A30000] applications to conduct certain activities with foreign endangered species.

European Protected Species Licensing Test 2 No satisfactory alternative

Eastern Tuna and Billfish Fishery Sea Turtle Mitigation Plan (TMP)

APPENDIX Region 6 Inland Area Contingency Plan Compliance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 05/27/10 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[FWS R1 ES 2017 N151; FXES FF01E00000] U.S. Endangered Species; Receipt of Recovery Permit Applications

BALD EAGLE PROTECTION GUIDELINES FOR VIRGINIA. Prepared by

107 FERC 61,282 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT

Case 1:11-cv PBS Document 1 Filed 10/31/11 Page 1 of 34 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Prepared by Australia

Pre-Visit Lesson Endangered Species On the Brink of Recovery

JUNE 1993 LAW REVIEW ENDANGERED SEA TURTLES PROTECTED DURING CITY BEACH RESTORATION

May 11, It is unclear to PEER whether Prime Hook National Wildlife Refuge management is aware of or condones the actions described below.

United States Department of the Interior

CENTER for BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY VIA FACSIMILE AND CERTIFIED MAIL/RETURN RECEIPT. Robert Williams, Field Supervisor

United States Department of the Interior

IC Chapter 34. Nongame and Endangered Species Conservation

Atlantic Sturgeon Listing under the Endangered Species Act. April 25, 2012

Permitting under the Endangered Species Act, 2007

Unalaska Navigation Channel Improvements

United States Department of the Interior

Agenda Item H.3: Final Exempted Fishing Permit Approval

Backgrounder and Frequently Asked Questions

NOAA Fisheries Service (NMFS) Update on North Atlantic Right Whale Recovery Actions

Threatened and Endangered Species Issues on the Kennebec River, Maine

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District

Case 1:11-cv GZS Document 1 Filed 01/31/11 Page 1 of 20 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE. Defendants.

[Docket No. FWS HQ IA ; FXIA FF09A30000] Endangered Species; Marine Mammal Receipt of Applications for Permit

Species Conclusions Table

2016 West Coast Entanglement Summary

United States Department of the Interior

Appendix E Biological Assessment

Blending Research, Management, Outreach, and Policy to Recover a Federally Listed Species. Megan M. Seymour

Protecting Biodiversity

[Docket No. FWS HQ IA ; FXIA FF09A30000] Endangered Species; Marine Mammals; Receipt of Applications for Permit

United States Department of the Interior

Natural Resource Statutes and Policies. Who Owns the Wildlife? Treaties. Federal Laws. State Laws. Policies. Administrative Laws.

Legislation. Lisa T. Ballance Marine Mammal Biology SIO 133 Spring 2013

Case 2:13-cv LKK-CKD Document 1 Filed 11/26/13 Page 1 of 14

Natural Resource Statutes and Policies

ESCA. Endangered Species Conservation Act of 1969 Changed in 1973 to ESA Amended several times

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric

Butte Environmental Council v. United States Army Corps of Engineers

United States Department of the Interior

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Endangered Species Emergency Consultation

RE: Stakeholder Comments for St Lawrence Snow Crab Trap Fishery and Scotian Shelf Snow Crab Trap Fishery Re-Certifications PCDRs

Aggregate Permit Applications: Natural Environment Report A.R Yes. Lands & Waters Aggregate & Petroleum Resources March 15, 2006

Exotic Wildlife Association Membership Alert

Ken Salazar, Secretary of the Interior Gary Locke, Secretary of Commerce

IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS OF THE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION LAW. Authorized by the Republic of China Wildlife Conservation Law, amended October 29, 1994.

Protected Resources Presentation to PSMFC

Case 2:11-cv GZS Document 1 Filed 01/31/11 Page 1 of 20 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Northern Long-eared Bats A Federally Threatened Species. Wende Mahaney USFWS Ecological Services Maine Field Office March 14, 2016

Developments Under the Endangered Species Act: What Organizations Need to Know. April 26, 2016

Bexar County Environmental Services 233 North Pecos La Trinidad, Suite 420, San Antonio, Texas (210) Office (210) Fax

Proposed Critical Habitat for Atlantic Sturgeon. Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission August 2, 2016

Meeting in Support of Species at Risk Act Listing Process for Lower Fraser River and Upper Fraser River White Sturgeon

Review of the Changes to the Fisheries Act

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT

Gulf of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary Safe Harbor for Sea Turtles

[Docket No. FWS HQ IA ; FXIA FF09A30000] Endangered and Threatened Species; Receipt of Applications for Permit

Claimed statutory authorities and roles in the Bison Management Plan for the State of Montana and Yellowstone National Park

Law on the Conservation of Species and Biotopes

United States Department of the Interior

March 20, 2018 ADENDUM. JOINT PUBLIC NOTICE Savannah District/State of Georgia

IOWA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

Transcription:

Information to assist in compliance with Nationwide Permit General Condition 18, Endangered Species Required Reporting via Pre-Construction Notification The purpose of this document is to provide information for prospective users of the Nationwide Permits (NWPs) that are not federal agencies to help them determine whether a proposed NWP activity requires a pre-construction notification (PCN) to ensure compliance with the Endangered Species Act (ESA). For the 2012 NWPs, ESA Section 7 compliance is covered by NWP General Condition 18. Paragraph (c) of NWP General Condition 18 requires a non-federal user of an NWP to submit a Pre- Construction Notification (PCN) form to the appropriate Corps District office if any listed species or designated critical habitat might be affected or is in the vicinity of the project, or if the project is located in designated critical habitat. Federal permittees are expected to follow their own procedures for complying with the ESA. If the proposed NWP activity requires a PCN the Federal permittee should submit a copy of its documentation demonstrating compliance with ESA Section 7 with its PCN (see paragraph (b)(6) of NWP General Condition 31). All PCNs are reviewed by Corps staff and evaluated for potential effects to listed species and critical habitat. Paragraph (c) of NWP General Condition 18 also states that the project proponent cannot begin the NWP activity until he or she has been notified by the Corps that the proposed activity will have no effect on listed species or critical habitat, or until [Endangered Species Act] Section 7 consultation has been completed if the Corps makes a may affect determination for the proposed NWP activity. The complete text of NWP General Condition 18 is provided in Appendix A. In Appendix B of this document, there are definitions that can assist non-federal permittees in determining whether their proposed NWP activities might affect listed species or designated critical habitat. Any potential effect to listed species or critical habitat, no matter how small, requires submission of a PCN to the Corps district office, so that the district can evaluate the proposed activity and determine whether ESA Section 7 consultation is required. Listed species under the jurisdiction of NOAA Fisheries that occur in the geographic area of responsibility of the Wilmington District are: Marine Mammal Species Scientific Name Status blue whale Balaenoptera musculus Endangered fin whale Balaenoptera physalus Endangered humpback whale Megaptera novaeangliae Endangered North Atlantic right whale Eubalaena glacialis Endangered sei whale Balaenoptera borealis Endangered sperm whale Physeter macrocephalus Endangered Sea Turtle Species green sea turtle Chelonia mydas Threatened1

-2- hawksbill sea turtle Eretmochelys imbricata Endangered Kemp's ridley sea turtle Lepidochelys kempii Endangered leatherback sea turtle Dermochelys coriacea Endangered loggerhead sea turtle Caretta caretta Threatened2 Fish Species Atlantic sturgeon Acipenser oxyrhynchus oxyrhynchus Endangered3 shortnose sturgeon Acipenser brevirostrum Endangered 1 Florida s breeding population is listed as endangered. 2 Northwest Atlantic distinct population segment. 3 The Carolina and the South Atlantic distinct population segments have spawning populations in Southeast rivers. Additional distinct population segments occur in Southeast waters. Information on these species is available at: http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/species/esa/ Within the Wilmington District, critical habitat has been designed by NOAA Fisheries for the following listed species: North Atlantic right whale: There is a proposed rule to expand critical habitat (currently not in waters off of NC) to include all marine waters from Cape Fear, North Carolina, southward to about 45 miles north of Cape Canaveral, Florida. Loggerhead sea turtle: There are 38 designated marine areas that occur throughout the Southeast Region. Maps of areas of designated critical habitat off of NC are posted on the District web site. Information on the critical habitat for these listed species can be found at: http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/species/esa/ Determining whether pre-construction notification is required There are three situations that require PCNs: (a) when required specifically by the terms and conditions of the NWP; (b) when required by regional conditions for the NWPs; or (c) when a project is in or within the vicinity of occupied habitat or designated critical habitat of any of the species listed above as determined from the NOAA Fisheries websites referenced above. Many of the NWPs require PCNs for all activities authorized by those NWPs. Some NWPs require PCNs only for certain types of activities. Please read the text of the NWP(s) you plan to use for your proposed activity. In the Wilmington District, regional conditions have been added to the NWPs to require pre-construction notification for additional activities. Please review those regional conditions, which are available at: http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/nwp2012/saw_rc s_final_sad_approved_2012-03-29.pdf

-3- If your project is located in any of the areas inhabited by the species listed above, within designated critical habitat for those species or in the vicinity of these areas, a PCN is required, regardless of the lack of any specific requirements in the individual NWPs or in the regional conditions for the NWPs. The information required for a PCN is listed in paragraph (b) of NWP General Condition 31. The combined state-federal PCN form used by Wilmington District, requires reporting of all potential endangered species or critical habitat issues in Section F (page 10 of 10 of the 2009 version) of the form. The Wilmington District will notify you within 45 days of receipt of your PCN whether formal or informal ESA Section 7 consultation needs to be conducted for the proposed NWP activity. You cannot conduct the NWP activity until notified by the Wilmington District that the proposed NWP activity will have no effect on listed species or critical habitat or the ESA Section 7 consultation has been completed. Please see the text of NWP General Condition 18, which is in Appendix A of this document, for more detail. The flow chart provided below gives some guidance on determining when a PCN should be submitted for a proposed NWP activity to comply with NWP General Condition 18 and other general and regional conditions. If you are uncertain about whether a PCN should be submitted for a particular NWP activity to comply with NWP General Condition 18, or if you have any questions regarding the information in this document, you should contact the Wilmington District at 910-251-4633 or visit our web site at http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/missions/regulatorypermitprogram.aspx for additional guidance. Questions concerning whether your proposed NWP activity is in the vicinity of the occupied range of listed species or in the vicinity of designated critical habitat should also be directed to the Wilmington District regulatory staff, because the determination of vicinity is dependent on the characteristics of the project site, the listed species, and the NWP activity.

-4- Pre-Construction Notification Determination Flow Chart Is proposed NWP activity located in the occupied range of listed species, in designated critical habitat or within the vicinity of either? (See NOAA Fisheries web site for species ranges.) Yes PCN should be submitted to comply with NWP GC 18 No Does the NWP for the proposed project require a PCN specifically? No Does a Regional Condition for the NWP for the proposed project require a PCN? No Yes Yes PCN should be submitted to comply with NWP GCs PCN should be submitted to comply with NWP GCs No PCN required under NWP GC 18

-5- Appendix A Text of Nationwide Permit General Condition 18 18. Endangered Species. (a) No activity is authorized under any NWP which is likely to directly or indirectly jeopardize the continued existence of a threatened or endangered species or a species proposed for such designation, as identified under the Federal Endangered Species Act (ESA), or which will directly or indirectly destroy or adversely modify the critical habitat of such species. No activity is authorized under any NWP which may affect a listed species or critical habitat, unless Section 7 consultation addressing the effects of the proposed activity has been completed. (b) Federal agencies should follow their own procedures for complying with the requirements of the ESA. Federal permittees must provide the district engineer with the appropriate documentation to demonstrate compliance with those requirements. The district engineer will review the documentation and determine whether it is sufficient to address ESA compliance for the NWP activity, or whether additional ESA consultation is necessary. (c) Non-federal permittees must submit a pre-construction notification to the district engineer if any listed species or designated critical habitat might be affected or is in the vicinity of the project, or if the project is located in designated critical habitat, and shall not begin work on the activity until notified by the district engineer that the requirements of the ESA have been satisfied and that the activity is authorized. For activities that might affect Federally-listed endangered or threatened species or designated critical habitat, the pre-construction notification must include the name(s) of the endangered or threatened species that might be affected by the proposed work or that utilize the designated critical habitat that might be affected by the proposed work. The district engineer will determine whether the proposed activity may affect or will have no effect to listed species and designated critical habitat and will notify the non- Federal applicant of the Corps determination within 45 days of receipt of a complete pre-construction notification. In cases where the non-federal applicant has identified listed species or critical habitat that might be affected or is in the vicinity of the project, and has so notified the Corps, the applicant shall not begin work until the Corps has provided notification the proposed activities will have no effect on listed species or critical habitat, or until Section 7 consultation has been completed. If the non-federal applicant has not heard back from the Corps within 45 days, the applicant must still wait for notification from the Corps. (d) As a result of formal or informal consultation with the FWS or NMFS the district engineer may add species-specific regional endangered species conditions to the NWPs. (e) Authorization of an activity by a NWP does not authorize the take of a threatened or endangered species as defined under the ESA. In the absence of separate authorization (e.g., an ESA Section 10 Permit, a Biological Opinion with incidental take provisions, etc.) from the U.S. FWS or the NMFS, The Endangered Species Act prohibits any person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States to take a listed species, where "take" means to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct. The word harm in the definition of take'' means an act which actually kills or injures wildlife. Such an act may include significant habitat modification or degradation where it actually kills or

-6- injures wildlife by significantly impairing essential behavioral patterns, including breeding, feeding or sheltering. (f) Information on the location of threatened and endangered species and their critical habitat can be obtained directly from the offices of the U.S. FWS and NMFS or their world wide web pages at http://www.fws.gov/ or http://www.fws.gov/ipac and http://www.noaa.gov/fisheries.html respectively. Appendix B Definitions Action means all activities or programs of any kind authorized, funded, or carried out, in whole or in part, by Federal agencies in the United States or upon the high seas. Examples include, but are not limited to: (a) actions intended to conserve listed species or their habitat; (b) the promulgation of regulations; (c) the granting of licenses, contracts, leases, easements, rights-of-way, permits, or grants-in-aid; or (d) actions directly or indirectly causing modifications to the land, water, or air. [50 CFR 402.02] Explanatory note For the purposes of the NWP Program, the action is generally the activity that is authorized by one or more NWPs (item (c)). Those activities are: discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States regulated under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and structures or work in navigable waters of the United States regulated under Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. Action area means all areas to be affected directly or indirectly by the Federal action and not merely the immediate area involved in the action. [50 CFR 402.02] Explanatory note When a Corps district receives a PCN for a proposed NWP activity, it will identify the action area if it determines the proposed NWP activity may affect listed species or designated critical habitat and therefore requires ESA Section 7 consultation. Effects of the action refers to the direct and indirect effects of a proposed action on listed species or critical habitat. [50 CFR 402.02] Direct effect means the direct or immediate effects of the proposed action on a listed species or its habitat. [Services 1998 Section 7 Consultation Handbook, page 4-25.] Indirect effect means effects that are caused by the proposed action and are later in time, but still are reasonably certain to occur. [50 CFR 402.02] Explanatory note For the purposes of determining whether a PCN is required because a proposed NWP activity might affect listed species or critical habitat, non-federal applicants should submit a PCN when the proposed activity is located within or in the vicinity of any of the areas inhabited by the species listed above or in designated critical habitat for those species, regardless of the lack of any specific requirements in the individual NWPs or in the regional conditions for the NWPs. As described in NWP General Condition 18, paragraph (c), proposed activities in occupied habitats, within

-7- designated critical habitat, or in the vicinity of these areas might affect listed species. The Corps district will evaluate that PCN and make an effect determination to decide whether ESA Section 7 consultation is required. The Corps district will notify the applicant of its determination, and if ESA Section 7 consultation is required, then the activity is not authorized by NWP until that consultation is completed. Destruction of adverse modification means a direct or indirect alteration that appreciably diminishes the value of critical habitat for both the survival and recovery of a listed species. Such alterations include, but are not limited to, alterations adversely modifying any of those physical or biological features that were the basis for determining the habitat to be critical. [50 CFR 402.02] Explanatory note Under NWP General Condition 18, pre-construction notification is required for any NWP activity that: (a) might affect designated critical habitat, (b) is in the vicinity of designated critical habitat, or (c) is located in critical habitat. The Corps district will evaluate the PCN to determine if the proposed NWP may affect designated critical habitat, and will conduct ESA Section 7 consultation if it makes a may affect determination. The Corps district will notify the applicant of its determination, and if ESA section 7 consultation is required, then the activity is not authorized by NWP until that consultation is completed. No effect means the proposed action will not directly or indirectly affect listed species or destroy/adversely modify designated critical habitat. Explanatory note There has to be no potential for an NWP activity to affect listed species or critical habitat to be considered no effect. For example, an NWP activity and all of its components would have to be located outside of the range and designated critical habitat of listed species, beyond the distance where an indirect effect might occur to listed species or designated critical habitat.