Thursday 18 th January Cambridgeshire Travel Survey Presentation to the Greater Cambridge Partnership Joint Assembly

Similar documents
The Greater Cambridge Travel Survey Report

Satisfaction with getting to work 56% 15% 6% 6% Total distance travelled. miles per week

Satisfaction with getting to work 54% 14% 6% 5% Total distance travelled. miles per week

PERSONALISED TRAVEL PLANNING IN MIDLETON, COUNTY CORK

Satisfaction with getting to work 55% 17% 8% 7% Total distance travelled. miles per week

Determining bicycle infrastructure preferences A case study of Dublin

Baseline Survey of New Zealanders' Attitudes and Behaviours towards Cycling in Urban Settings

Briefing Paper #1. An Overview of Regional Demand and Mode Share

UWA Commuting Survey 2013

Staff Travel Survey 2015 Key Findings

1.0 FOREWORD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION CURRENT TRENDS IN TRAVEL FUTURE TRENDS IN TRAVEL...

Travel to Work Survey March % 40% 54% 10% 2% 5% 19% 6% 3% Headlines - FILTON. Main modes of travel (%)

1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey

STAFF TRAVEL SURVEY 2006 KEY FINDINGS

Final Plan 20 December 2016

TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY

Brighton & Hove Bus Company in Brighton & Hove Council area

Arriva in Medway July 2010 (Kent) Council area

BUS PASSENGER SURVEY Merseyside BUS PASSENGER SURVEY RESULTS FOR: November 2009

BUS PASSENGER SURVEY RESULTS FOR: BUS PASSENGER SURVEY STAGECOACH Stagecoach in GMPTE area

Western Greyhound in Cornwall Council area

BUS BUS PASSENGER SURVEY RESULTS ARRIVA Arriva in Merseyside November 2009 PTE (Merseytravel) area

First in Stoke-on-Trent November 2009 City Council area

BUS BUS PASSENGER SURVEY Cornwall RESULTS FOR:

Stagecoach in Swindon Borough area

Arriva in GMPTE July 2010area

Route User Intercept Survey Report

RE-CYCLING A CITY: EXAMINING THE GROWTH OF CYCLING IN DUBLIN

KLB Travel to School Survey - Summary Report

Life Transitions and Travel Behaviour Study. Job changes and home moves disrupt established commuting patterns

Investment in Active Transport Survey

Student Travel Survey 2013

Travel to Work Survey March % 58% 32% 9% 7% 5% 16% 20% 12% Headlines - Bristol LA Area. Main modes of travel (%)

Student Travel Survey 2012 results

University of Leeds Travel Plan

Report to: Greater Cambridge Partnership Executive Board 4 July Transport Strategy - Future Public Transport Requirements

Child Road Safety in Great Britain,

Travel Planning WC & NWCD Cycling Group. Thursday 2 nd July Amanda Holden

The role of the Authority in promoting sustainable transport. Gerry Murphy South East Regional Assembly 27 th May 2011

Liikkumisen ohjauksen mahdollisuudet rakennustyömailla. Dutch experiences

Travel Plan Monitoring Report. Bourton View, Wellingborough - Residential

Time-activity pattern of children and elderly in Rome. Action 3.1

BICYCLE INFRASTRUCTURE PREFERENCES A CASE STUDY OF DUBLIN

National Transport Awards Cambridge Park & Ride

Contents Location Map Welcome and Introduction Travel Plan Management Science Park Accessibility Walking Cycling Bus Rail Car Sharing Contact Details

Commuting by train to work in the Avonmouth - Severnside Enterprise Area

Travel Patterns and Cycling opportunites

Accessibility, mobility and social exclusion

Using a Mixed-Method Approach to Evaluate the Behavioural Effects of the Cycling City and Towns Programme

Customer Satisfaction Tracking Report 2016 Quarter 1

Satisfaction with Canada Line and Connecting Buses. Wave 2

Executive Summary. TUCSON TRANSIT ON BOARD ORIGIN AND DESTINATION SURVEY Conducted October City of Tucson Department of Transportation

Weather and Cycling in Dublin : Perceptions and Reality

CONTENTS PREFACE 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE 2.0 POLICY AND GOVERNANCE 3.0 SUMMARY OF PROGRESS 4.0 NATURE OF DEMAND 5.0 TRAVEL AND PARKING INITIATIVES

Active Travel Strategy Dumfries and Galloway

Sandwell General Hospital Travel Plan 2014

BIKEPLUS Public Bike Share Users Survey Results 2017

THE SOCIAL IMPACT OF BICYCLE IN SÃO PAULO May 2018

Greater Cambridge City Deal Executive Board & Joint Assembly

Evaluating a Cycling Strategy

2014 Ontario Works Transit Survey: Final Results

Paper submitted to the Scottish Transport Studies Group (STSG) April 2004

Making Dublin More Accessible: The dublinbikes Scheme. Martin Rogers Colm Keenan 13th November 2012

Land Use and Cycling. Søren Underlien Jensen, Project Manager, Danish Road Directorate Niels Juels Gade 13, 1020 Copenhagen K, Denmark

Churn Valley Cycle Group

Measuring and growing active modes of transport in Auckland

EAST VILLAGE SHOPPERS STUDY A SNAPSHOT OF TRAVEL AND SPENDING PATTERNS OF RESIDENTS AND VISITORS IN THE EAST VILLAGE

Sustainable Transport Blueprint for Canterbury. Lynn Sloman

2016 Capital Bikeshare Member Survey Report

Cabrillo College Transportation Study

Soft measures affect traffic in Lund effects from two years work with a sustainable transport system in Lund

January Project No

U.S. Bicycling Participation Study

CSRM Modelling Summary Report for Cambridge and South Cambridgeshire Local Plans July 2013

LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY. Transport Strategy

Travel Patterns and Characteristics

2015 Origin/Destination Study

SAN FRANCISCO WOMEN AND BIKING A CASE STUDY ON THE USE OF SAN FRANCISCO BIKE LANES SYNTHESIS

SUSTAINABLE TRAVEL TOWNS: RESULTS AND LESSONS

Transportation Trends, Conditions and Issues. Regional Transportation Plan 2030

Building a sustainable world city: the role of transport and land use in London. London s relationship with transport

Loughborough University Travel Planning

CAMBRIDGE ACCESS STUDY: TACKLING CONGESTION WORKSHOP

2011 Origin-Destination Survey Bicycle Profile

March Maidstone Integrated Transport Strategy Boxley Parish Council Briefing Note. Context. Author: Parish Clerk 2 March 2016

DE MONTFORT UNIVERSITY TRAVEL PLAN PROGRESS REPORT

15% Survey on Smart Commuting. Factsheet: University of Twente. 435 out of invited employees. This is a response rate of

Modal Shift in the Boulder Valley 1990 to 2009

Reflections on our learning: active travel, transport and inequalities

Master Transportation Plan Bicycle Element Survey

No-car lanes in Tyneside results from modelling and stakeholder analysis

Acknowledgements. Ms. Linda Banister Ms. Tracy With Mr. Hassan Shaheen Mr. Scott Johnston

Appendix N(b): Portishead Station Outline Travel Plan

Department for Transport

EUROPEAN MOBILITY WEEK September 2015

Technical note. 1. Introduction

The seamless journey The seamless journey: Public transport links with walking and cycling

How the free public transport policy affects the travel behavior of individual

The most innovative bike hire scheme in the UK

2011 Countywide Attitudinal and Awareness Survey Results

Transcription:

Thursday 18 th January 2018 Cambridgeshire Travel Survey Presentation to the Greater Cambridge Partnership Joint Assembly

Contents 1. Study Background 2. Methodology 3. Key Findings An opportunity for modal shift away from car/van Recent changes in transport modes How to encourage modal shift

Study Background aims to develop a sustainable transport network for Greater Cambridge keep people, business and ideas connected as the population grows independent research consultancy specialising in transport Research with Cambridge and South Cambridgeshire residents to better understand travel behaviour, and reasons for travel choices to support the design of a transport strategy to: reduce congestion encourage modal shift shape investment from 2020 onwards Page 3

Methodology 1,021 computer aided telephone interviews (CATI) September-October 2017 Telephone numbers compiled and dialled at random Demographic profiling to target a representative sample in terms of district, gender and age Prize draw incentive Weighted and unweighted data provided Page 4

Data Weighting Data weighting adjusts the weight given to different responses so that, overall, the results better reflect the views/behaviours of the population of interest Survey: 42% Cambridge, 58% South Cambridgeshire ONS Population Estimates for mid-2016: 47% Cambridge, 53% South Cambridgeshire Over sampled South Cambridgeshire Weightings are applied which bring the proportions back in line with the population Segmentation analysis is also undertaken to look at sub-groups of the population and how they may differ District Achieved Sample (N) Weighted Sample (N) Cambridge 424 481 South Cambridgeshire Gender 597 540 Male 414 514 Female 606 506 Age 16-24 years old 127 181 25-49 years old 366 434 50-64 years old 255 208 65+ years old 270 196 Page 5

Questionnaire The survey was designed to capture information about: respondents demographics current travel behaviour in and around Cambridge reasons for travel choices alternative travel modes the likelihood various potential initiatives might have on their travel choices Page 6

An opportunity for modal shift away from car/van There is both potential and appetite for modal shift among car/van drivers Overall Cambridge South Cambridgeshire Use a car/van Would like to make more journeys without 68% 56% 56% 80% of which 57% 56% 25-49 year olds more receptive to change than others (62%) Females more receptive than males (62%) ONS Population estimates for mid 2016 suggest there are 236,232 people aged 16+ years old in Cambridge and South Cambridgeshire Results suggest potential for at least 89,957 less car/van journeys Page 7

Percentage An opportunity for modal shift away from car/van Bus, minibus and coach services, and cycling, were the most likely alternative to car/van 50% 40% Of the journeys you make by car/van, could you make these journeys using any of the following modes of transport instead? 30% 20% 10% 0% Overall Cambridge South Cambridgeshire Page 8

Percentage An opportunity for modal shift away from car/van The speed and reliability of alternative modes were the most common reasons for not using alternative modes 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Speed of journey Reliability of journey Price of transport Distance to destination Complexity of journey Physical comfort Frequency of journey Overall Cambridge South Cambridge Page 9

Recent changes in transport modes 2017 survey compared to 2011 Census Respondents who stated that they made commuting journeys to/from work were asked to identify the mode of transport they usually use for these specific journeys. This question was also asked in the 2011 Census Car/Van (as a driver) Bicycle Bus, minibus or coach services Walking/Running Work mainly at/from home Car/Van (as a passenger) Taxi Train Motorcycle/Moped/Scooter Other 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Census 2011 Survey Results Page 10

Recent changes in transport modes 2017 survey compared to 2011 Census Similar patterns are seen in both Cambridge and South Cambridgeshire Bicycle Car/Van (as a driver) Bus, minibus or coach services Walking/Running Work mainly at/from home Car/Van (as a passenger) Train Taxi Motorcycle/Moped/Scooter Other Cambridge Car/Van (as a driver) Bicycle Bus, minibus or coach services Walking/Running Work mainly at/from home Taxi Motorcycle/Moped/Scooter Car/Van (as a passenger) Train Other South Cambridgeshire 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Census 2011 Survey Results Census 2011 Survey Results Page 11

Overall Cambridge South Cambridgeshire How to encourage modal shift Top 5 incentives to encourage modal shift, overall and by district Those who currently make journeys by car/van were asked to state to what extent different initiatives would encourage them to travel by alternative modes 1. New public transport routes introduced 1. Cheaper public transport fares 1. Free parking at Park & Ride sites 2. More reliable services on public transport 2. New public transport routes introduced 2. New public transport routes introduced 3. Cheaper public transport fares 3. More reliable services on public transport 3. More frequent services on public transport 4. More frequent services on public transport 4. Better offers on public transport tickets 4. More reliable services on public transport 5. Free parking at Park & Ride sites 5. Improved cycle paths / facilities 5. Cheaper public transport fares Page 12

Overall Cambridge South Cambridgeshire How to encourage modal shift Bottom 5 incentives to encourage modal shift, overall and by district The 5 initiatives least likely to encourage modal shift, overall and by district. 32. Provision of travel planning advice 32. Provision of travel planning advice 32. Provision of travel planning advice 31. Introduction of a Workplace Parking Levy 31. Introduction of a Workplace Parking Levy 31. Introduction of a Workplace Parking Levy 30. Fewer on-street parking spaces 29. Direct public transport / weather alerts to your phone 28.Improved facilities at your workplace 30. Fewer on-street parking spaces 29. Direct public transport / weather alerts to your phone 28. Season ticket loans 30. Fewer on-street parking spaces 29. Improved facilities at your workplace 28. Flexible working hours Page 13 Proposition and Narrative Testing Market Research

Carry Stephenson Liz Boast Sophie Murphy www.systra.co.uk