Manual Tasks Minimum Standard. October, 2014

Similar documents
Manual Handling Procedure

Control of Vibration at Work

GENERAL WORK HEALTH & SAFETY CHECKLIST INTENDED USE. St Euphemia College - General Work Health and Safety Checklist

Injury Prevention and Ergonomics Manual Health & Safety

ASSESSING AND CONTROLLING MANUAL HANDLING RISK

Project & Task Work Health and Safety Risk Management Procedure

MANUAL HANDLING CODE OF PRACTICE

Health & Safety Policy HSP 17 Vibration Version Status Date Title of Reviewer Purpose/Outcome

HMCL211. Session 1. Work Health And Safety. Regulations, Risk Management, Ergonomics & Manual Handling. Department of Naturopathic Medicine

Risk Guide: Manual Handling

Health & Safety and Employment Law

NEBOSH International General Certificate Paper-2

List 4 Example Of How Manual Handling Risks Can Be Reduced

Constructive Ideas. Assessing the risk of sprains and strains CI Introduction. Step 1: Identify hazards. What is musculoskeletal injury (MSI)?

HEALTH AND SAFETY GUIDANCE NOTE HAND-ARM VIBRATION

CONTRACTOR SAFETY INDUCTION HANDBOOK

Naval Facilities Engineering Command Ergonomic Risk Assessment for Aircraft Maintenance Department

Safety Guidelines for Live Entertainment and Events I Part 2. Hazard Identification and Risk Management 1

Corporate Standard Manual Handling HB#

Naval Facilities Engineering Command. Ergonomics Risk Assessment for. Dinghy Retrieval and Storage

Bicycle Power Research and Design Factors

Annex BB to Facilities Management Health and Safety Policy guidance.

Accident/Incident Reporting and Investigation Procedures

MSD Risk Assessment Checklist

"HAND, WRIST AND FINGER SAFETY IN CONSTRUCTION ENVIRONMENTS"

Boating Activity Minimum Standard. January 2015

BHC-P-07.2 Health Hazards in Construction

Appendix 23- A: Physical Risk Factor Ergonomic Checklist

Hand-Arm Vibration. Sue Hewitt Health and Safety Laboratory.

GUIDELINE for MSD Hazard Control Measures

Work Health Safety Record Management Guidelines. October, 2014

Preventing Musculoskeletal Injuries (MSIs) in Manufacturing

Plant Isolation Lock out/tag out Procedure

Management of risk. Definition of terms. Managing risks. Risk

GIBRALTAR MARITIME ADMINISTRATION (Ministry of Maritime Affairs)

THERMAL COMFORT GUIDELINES

Chief Operating Officer Approved by. Responsible Officer. Vice-Chancellor Approved and commenced 25 September, 2017 Review by September, 2020

HEALTH AND SAFETY GUIDANCE NOTE MANUAL HANDLING

Unit 302 Health & Safety in ICT. By Josh Gibson

To comply with the OHS Act, the responsible manager must carry out and document the following:

MSD RISK ASSESSMENT. Risk Factor "Potential Risk" "High Risk" Contact Stress Repetition Grip Force Lift/Lower Force Awkward Posture Vibration WSPS.

HS329 Risk Management Procedure

Section 5: Hazard Identification ( version)

2.18 Manual Handling Policy and Procedure Table of Contents

Ergonomics Steps to Injury Prevention. Janelle Haines, John Deere 2018

Guidance: HSW Risk Assessment Methodology HSW-PR09-WI01. Objective. Implementation

Safe work method statements

HAZARD RECOGNITION EVALUATION and CONTROL

SAFE WORK METHOD STATEMENT

Work Health and Safety Risk Management Procedures

Manual Handling October 2014

Policy Redesign Project. Plant Safety Policy. Table of Contents

Recognition, Evaluation, and Control of Hazards

4.1 The Vice-Chancellor and University Executive Committee

SAFE MANUAL HANDLING OPERATIONS

Manual Handling Risk Assessment Procedure (HS.1.09)

University College Dublin Machinery/Equipment Risk Assessment Template

TECHNICAL INFORMATION SHEET 17. Revision 1 : 2016 MODEL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR THE MANUAL HANDLING OF GAS CYLINDERS

Occupational Health & Safety

Safety Services Guidance. Hand Arm Vibration

Hazardous substance risk management

Chapter 13: Manual Handling

Health & Safety Policy & Plan. Rightway Roofing.

Health and Safety Services. Safety Guide 37. Manual Handling. Facilities Management Directorate

Safe Work Method Statement

Quarries National Joint Advisory Committee (QNJAC) Occupational Health. Information Sheet 7. October Whole Body Vibration

Health, Safety and Environment Management System. HSE-PRO-008 HSE Responsibilities Procedure

RISK ASSESSMENT AND HAZARD CONTROL

Manual Handling Policy

Hand Arm and Whole Body vibrations exposure- directive and standard

Health & Safety Policy HSP 08 Control of Substances Hazardous to Health (COSHH) Version Status Date Title of Reviewer Purpose/Outcome

Chapter 13: Manual Handling

Ergonomics: Assessments and Evaluations for Job Improvements. Travis Ellis, CSP, CHMM

Risk Management Program March 2015

WorkWell Consulting Ergonomic Risk Identification & Assessment. Job Title: Equipment Operator III (Sweeper) Elgin Ford #2108 Date: September 17, 2003

Golf Stretches and Flexibility Exercises

Hazard Identification and Risk Management

Hazard Management Making your workplace safer

POLICY ON THE PROVISION & USE OF PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT

Risk Assessment & Safe Working Practice

Hand Arm Vibration Guidance. Kevin Burrows

Assessing OHS Risk. Guidelines for ANU

MSD HAZARD IDENTIFICATION FORM

P-2B & MP-2B SERIES POWER TOOL ANALYZER

The Management of Hazardous Manual Handling Operations. The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations

Module: Permit to work System

Environmental Health & Safety Programs

Newtown Neighbourhood Centre

NIOSH/BACK BELTS--Do They Prevent Injury?

Safe High Pressure Water Washing (HPWW) Requirement

WILTSHIRE POLICE FORCE PROCEDURE

Low Medium High Critical Business Impact: X Changes are important, but urgent implementation is not required, incorporate into your existing workflow.

Risk Management Guide

Health & Safety Plan `

How to Manage Work Health and Safety Risks

HEALTH & SAFETY GUIDANCE FOR MANAGERS MINIMUM SPECIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR OFFICE FURNITURE AND DISPLAY SCREEN EQUIPMENT (DSE)

4 Staff Selection, Appraisal and Development. To prevent harm by identifying and controlling potential hazards.

Safe Work Method Statement

Contents. Page Introduction 2 Scope 2 Roles and Responsibilities 3. Risk Management Process 5 Figure 1 The Risk Management Process 6

Meet Today s Webinar Team

Transcription:

Manual Tasks Minimum Standard Manual Tasks Minimum Standard October, 2014 Contents 1 Executive Summary... 2 2 More Information... 2 3 Using this Standard... 2 4 Managing Risk... 2 4.1 Consultation... 2 4.2 Identifying Hazardous Manual Tasks... 2 4.3 Assessing the Risks... 3 4.4 Controlling the Risks... 3 4.5 Reviewing Control Measures... 4 4.6 Designers, Manufacturers, Importers and Suppliers... 4 5 Responsibilities... 4 6 Glossary... 5 7 Supporting Documentation:... 6 8 Versioning... 6 9 Appendices... 7 Responsible Officer Executive Director Human Resources Approved by Executive Director Human Resources Approved and commenced October, 2014 Review by October, 2017 Relevant Legislation, Ordinance, Rule and/or Governance Level Principle the Standard supports Responsible Organisational Unit Work Health and Safety Act 2012 Work Health and Safety Regulations 2012 Work Health and Safety Unit Human Resources Manual Tasks Minimum Standard (October, 2014) Page 1

Manual Tasks Minimum Standard 1 Executive Summary The University of Tasmania is committed to the identification of hazardous manual tasks, the assessment of the risks of musculoskeletal disorders and the elimination or minimisation of those risks at the University of Tasmania s workplaces. 2 More Information For further information, contact the Human Resources Work Health and Safety Unit Email: health.safety@utas.edu.au 3 Using this Standard The University is required to: manage health and safety risk in accordance with the Work Health and Safety Act 2012; and manage risk relating to musculoskeletal disorder (MSD) associated with hazardous manual tasks in accordance with the Work Health and Safety Regulations. And is designed to support the University of Tasmania Work Health and Safety Policy. This minimum standard is to be read in conjunction with the Hazardous Manual Tasks Code of Practice, which provides guidance on how to manage the risks associated with those manual tasks that have the potential to cause musculoskeletal disorder. 4 Managing Risk 4.1 Consultation The manager/supervisor is to consult with staff and their Health and Safety Representatives (HSRs) at each step of the risk management process and as early as possible when planning to: introduce new tasks or change existing tasks; select new equipment; refurbish, renovate or redesign existing workplaces; and carry out work in new environments. Staff, students, volunteers and contractors are encouraged to report problems with manual tasks and signs of discomfort to their manager/supervisor immediately so that risks can be managed before an injury occurs. A summary of this process is provided in the Code of Practice and included at Appendix A The Risk Management Process for Manual Tasks. 4.2 Identifying Hazardous Manual Tasks The first step in managing risks from carrying out manual tasks is to identify those tasks that have the potential to cause MSDs. Managers/supervisors are to: consult with staff; review available information; look for trends; Manual Tasks Minimum Standard (October, 2014) Page 2

Manual Tasks Minimum Standard observe manual tasks. Managers/supervisors are to be aware of the characteristics of hazardous manual tasks, including forceful muscular exertions as these are associated with most MSDs. A Hazardous Manual Task Identification Worksheet is provided at Appendix B and a Discomfort Survey at Appendix C. 4.3 Assessing the Risks Managers/supervisors are to ensure a risk assessment is undertaken to examine the characteristics of identified hazardous manual task and to assess whether the forces, movements and postures are undertaken in such a way that they give rise to the risk of MSDs. Managers/supervisors are to ensure a risk assessment is carried out for any manual tasks identified as being hazardous, unless the risk is well-known and it is known how to control it. A risk assessment for hazardous manual tasks is to: identify who should participate in the risk assessment; describe the task and area where the manual task is performed; determine which risk factors pose a risk and why the risk exists; determine which postures, movements and forces of the task pose a risk. An assessment may be undertaken by a staff member trained in workstation setup, or a specialist ergonomic provider may be engaged. The assessment is to consider the main sources of risk which include: work area design and layout; the nature, size, weight or number of things handled in performing the manual task; systems of work; and the environment in which the manual task is performed. The Risk Assessment Worksheet at Appendix D may be used to record the findings. 4.4 Controlling the Risks Managers/supervisors are to ensure that in controlling risk they: work through the hierarchy of control (Appendix E); and choose the control that most effectively eliminates or minimises the risk in the circumstances. The most effective control measure involves eliminating the hazardous manual task and its associated risk. If it is not reasonably practicable to eliminate the risk, then the manager/supervisor must ensure the risks are minimised so far as is reasonably practicable by: substituting the hazard with something that gives rise to a lesser risk; isolating the hazard from any person exposed to it; implementing engineering controls. Manual Tasks Minimum Standard (October, 2014) Page 3

Manual Tasks Minimum Standard If there is a remaining risk, it must be minimised so far as is reasonably practicable by implementing administrative controls, such as Exertime and if a risk still remains, then suitable personal protective equipment must be provided and used. This may involve a single control measure or a combination of two or more different controls. 4.5 Reviewing Control Measures The manager/supervisor must ensure that control measures that have been implemented are reviewed and, if necessary, revised: when the control measure does not minimise the risk so far as is reasonably practicable; before a change at the workplace that is likely to give rise to a new or different health and safety risk that the control measure may not effectively control; if a new hazard or risk is identified; if the results of consultation indicate that a review is necessary; if a HSR requests a review. 4.6 Designers, Manufacturers, Importers and Suppliers Designers, manufacturers, importers and suppliers of plant and structures have duties under the Work Health and Safety Act 2012 to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, that their products are without risks to health and safety when used for a purpose for which they were designed or manufactured. Managers/supervisors are to ensure that as a purchaser and user of plant and structures the manufacturers, importers and suppliers give the information required to use the product safely, including during its transportation, operation and maintenance. 5 Responsibilities Designers, manufacturers, importers and suppliers Health and Safety Representatives (HSRs) Must ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, that the plant or structure they design, manufacture, import or supply is without risks to health and safety. The HSR is to be consulted during the risk management process when planning to: introduce new tasks or change existing tasks; select new equipment; refurbish, renovate or redesign existing workplaces; and carry out work in new environments. The HSR may request a review of control measures that have been implemented. Officers Officers have a duty to take reasonable steps to ensure that the University has and uses appropriate resources and processes to eliminate or minimise risks that arise from hazardous manual tasks. Manual Tasks Minimum Standard (October, 2014) Page 4

Manual Tasks Minimum Standard Workers Workers have a duty to take reasonable care for their own health and safety and that they do not adversely affect the health and safety of other persons. Workers must comply with any reasonable instruction and cooperate with any reasonable policy or procedure relating to health and safety at the workplace. 6 Glossary Term/Acronym Code of Practice Exertime HSR Hazardous manual task Manual tasks Definition An approved code of practice is a practical guide to achieving the standards of health, safety and welfare required under the Work Health and Safety Act 2012 and the Work Health and Safety Regulations. Software application that encourages employees to break long bouts of sitting by engaging in short bouts of physical activity during work hours. Health Safety Representative A hazardous manual task, as defined in the WHS Regulations, means a task that requires a person to lift, lower, push, pull, carry or otherwise move, hold or restrain any person, animal or thing involving one or more of the following: repetitive or sustained force high or sudden force repetitive movement sustained or awkward posture exposure to vibration. Most jobs involve carrying out some type of manual task using the body to move or hold an object, people or animals. Some manual tasks are hazardous and may cause musculoskeletal disorders. Manual Tasks Minimum Standard (October, 2014) Page 5

Manual Tasks Minimum Standard Musculoskeletal Disorder (MSD) Organisational Unit Organisational Unit A musculoskeletal disorder, as defined in the WHS Regulations, means an injury to, or a disease of, the musculoskeletal system, whether occurring suddenly or over time. It does not include an injury caused by crushing, entrapment (such as fractures and dislocations) or cutting resulting from the mechanical operation of plant. MSDs may include conditions such as: sprains and strains of muscles, ligaments and tendons back injuries, including damage to the muscles, tendons, ligaments, spinal discs, nerves, joints and bones joint and bone injuries or degeneration, including injuries to the shoulder, elbow, wrist, hip, knee, ankle, hands and feet nerve injuries or compression (e.g. carpal tunnel syndrome) muscular and vascular disorders as a result of handarm vibration soft tissue hernias chronic pain. MSDs occur in two ways: gradual wear and tear to joints, ligaments, muscles and inter-vertebral discs caused by repeated or continuous use of the same body parts, including static body positions sudden damage caused by strenuous activity, or unexpected movements such as when loads being handled move or change position suddenly. Injuries can also occur due to a combination of these mechanisms, for example, body tissue that has been weakened by cumulative damage may be vulnerable to sudden injury by lower forces. College, Faculty, School, Centre, University Institute, other University Entity, Division, Section or University Business Enterprise Health Safety Representative 7 Supporting Documentation: Hazardous Manual Tasks Code of Practice Work Health and Safety Policy 8 Versioning Former Version Current Version Version 1 Manual Handling Policy and Procedures; Approved 16 th March 2000 by Occupational Health and Safety Committee; revoked by the Work Health and Safety Committee, 27 August 2013. Version 2 Manual Tasks Minimum Standard (current document) ; approved October 2014. Amended in December 2016 to incorporate Colleges. Manual Tasks Minimum Standard (October, 2014) Page 6

Manual Tasks Minimum Standard 9 Appendices Appendix A The Risk Management Process for Manual Tasks Appendix B Hazardous Manual Task Identification Worksheet Appendix C Discomfort Survey Appendix D Risk Assessment Worksheet Appendix E Hierarchy of Control Source: Hazardous Manual Tasks Code of Practice Manual Tasks Minimum Standard (October, 2014) Page 7

Manual Tasks Minimum Standard APPENDIX A THE RISK MANAGEMENT PROCESS FOR MANUAL TASKS What is the manual task? Using the body to lift, lower, push, pull, carry or otherwise move, hold or restrain any person, animal or thing. Is the manual task hazardous? Application of force: Repetitive Sustained High Sudden Posture: Sustained Awkward Movement: Repetitive Exposure to vibration What is the risk of MSD? How often and how long are specific postures, movement or forces performed or held? What is the duration of the task? Does the task involve high or sudden force? Does the task involve vibration? Work area design and layout What is the source of risk? Systems of work Nature, size, weight and number of persons, animals or things handled Work environment Is the task necessary? Can the source of risk (work area layout, environment, etc) be changed? Can mechanical aids be used to perform the task? What training is needed to support the control measures? when the control measure is no longer effective before a change at the workplace that is likely to give rise to a new or different health and safety risk that the control measure may not effectively control if a new hazard or risk is identified if the results of consultation indicate that a review is necessary if a health and safety representative at the workplace requests a review. CONSULT CONSULT CONSULT CONSULT Manual Tasks Minimum Standard (October, 2014) Page 8

APPENDIX B HAZARDOUS MANUAL TASK IDENTIFICATION WORKSHEET Manual Tasks Minimum Standard (October, 2014) Page 9

APPENDIX C DISCOMFORT SURVEY Manual Tasks Minimum Standard (October, 2014) Page 10

APPENDIX D RISK ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Manual Tasks Minimum Standard (October, 2014) Page 11

Manual Tasks Minimum Standard (October, 2014) Page 12

Manual Tasks Minimum Standard (October, 2014) Page 13

Manual Tasks Minimum Standard (October, 2014) Page 14

Manual Tasks Minimum Standard (October, 2014) Page 15

APPENDIX E RISK ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET The hierarchy of control The ways of controlling the risk of MSDs are ranked from the highest level of protection and reliability to the lowest. This ranking is known as the hierarchy of risk control. The WHS Regulations require duty holders to work through this hierarchy to choose the control that most effectively eliminates or minimises the risk in the circumstances. This may involve a single control measure or a combination of two or more different controls. Eliminate the risk The most effective control measure involves eliminating the hazardous manual task and its associated risk. Eliminating hazards and risks is usually easier and cheaper to achieve in the planning or design stage of an item, process or place used for work. Minimise the risk If it is not reasonably practicable to eliminate the risk, then you must minimise the risks so far as is reasonably practicable by: substituting the hazard with something that gives rise to a lesser risk isolating the hazard from any person exposed to it implementing engineering controls. If there is a remaining risk, it must be minimised so far as is reasonably practicable by implementing administrative controls, and if a risk still remains, then suitable personal protective equipment must be provided and used. These two types of control measures, when used on their own, tend to be least effective in minimising risks because they rely on human behaviour and supervision. Control measures should be aimed at eliminating or minimising the frequency, magnitude and duration of movements, forces and postures by changing the source of risk: the work area, tool, load, environment, method of handling and/or the way work is organised. Hierarchy of control Examples of control measures Level 1 Elimination Automate the manual task (such as using remote controls) Deliver goods directly to the point of use to eliminate multiple handling Level 2 Substitution Replace heavy items with those that are lighter, smaller and/or easier to handle Replace hand tools with power tools to reduce the level of force required to do the task Isolation Isolate vibrating machinery from the user, for example by providing fully independent seating on mobile plant Engineering Use mechanical lifting aids Provide workstations that are height adjustable Level 3 Administrative Rotate workers between different tasks Train workers to use control measures implemented when carrying out normal tasks Personal protective equipment Heat resistant gloves for handling hot items Shock absorbent shoes for work on hard concrete floors Hazardous Manual Tasks Code of Practice Manual Tasks Minimum Standard (October, 2014) Page 16