IRB Myths & Misconceptions: Myths Busted Kelly Kidner, CIP & Stacie Fujisaki, CIP

Similar documents
SOP 5.06 Full Committee Review: Initial IRB Review

Standard Operating Policy and Procedures (SOPP) 3:

Effective Date: January 16, 2012 Policy Number: MHC_RP0107. Revised Date: November 2, 2015 Oversight Level: Corporate

Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committees for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures. IRB Review Processes

IRB Chair Responsibilities

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD PROCEDURES FOR FULL BOARD REVIEW

I. Summary. II. Responsibilities

Initial Review. Approved By: Michele Kennett, JD, MSN, LLM Associate Vice Chancellor for Research. Table of Contents

Effective Date Revisions Date Review by the Convened Institutional Review Board

Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committees for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures Continuing Review of Approved Research

Investigator Manual. If you have questions about whether an activity requires IRB review, contact the IRB Office.

Signature Date Date First Effective: Signature Date Revision Date: 07/18/2011

I. Summary. II. Responsibilities

Signature Date Date First Effective: Signature Date Revision Date:

HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS RESEARCH NETWORK

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD CONTINUING REVIEW AND REAPPROVAL OF RESEARCH

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD CONTINUING REVIEW OF RESEARCH

Florida State University IRB Standard Operational Procedures

Supersedes Document Dated: 7/7/11. SOP: RR 401 Version No.: 07 Version Date: 9/8/15 EXPEDITED REVIEW 1. POLICY

Pepperdine University eprotocol - IRB Student Investigator User Guide

SMART IRB Agreement Implementation Checklist and Documentation Tool

University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board. Reliance Agreement Guidance: Penn as Central IRB FAQ

IRB MEETING ADMINISTRATION

Yale University Institutional Review Boards

7.0 DEVIATION and EXCEPTION of a PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PROTOCOL

Procedure Department: HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTIONS PROGRAM Policy Number: II.B.1

Click IRB Resources Frequently Asked Questions

Arkansas Tech University Institutional Review Board

CONTINUING REVIEW 3/7/2016

To assure knowledge and compliance by documenting the annual administrative review and continuing IRB review of non-exempt projects for the IRB.

OHRP Guidance on Written IRB Procedures

Policies & Standard Operating Procedures

Getting to and through the IRB

To assure knowledge and compliance by documenting the continuing review procedure of approved projects for the IRB.

AMENDMENTS TO PREVIOUSLY APPROVED RESEARCH 3/01/2016

University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board. Reliance Agreement Guidance: How to Apply for External IRB Review

RESEARCH SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

EXPEDITED REVIEW. Terms used in this policy, but not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Glossary.

2.0 Institutional Review Board

University of Iowa External/Central IRB Reliance Process Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)

IRB Authorization Agreement Implementation Checklist and Documentation Tool

Human Research Protection Program Policy

IRB Staff Administration Guide

Illinois Institute of Technology Institutional Review Board Handbook of Procedures for the Protection of Human Research Subjects

IRB MEETING ADMINISTRATION

Tuesday, May 15, Please be sure to sign in and take copies of each handout.

RESEARCH PROTECTIONS OFFICE

Issue in IRB Approvals:

IRB Training October 22, 2015

SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH

The Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures. Cooperative Agreements

Purpose: The following serves to aid Principal Investigators (PI) in the submission of Amendments to AURA-IRB. Document includes: Acronyms and Legend

SOP Title Review of Research: Devices for Humanitarian Uses

IRB Reliance Models: Workshop for OSU Researchers Collaborating with External Partners

Harding IRB FAQ. Issue 1: General Questions

The IRB reviews and monitors human subjects research conducted by Columbia College Chicago faculty, staff, and students.

IRBMED: Ceding IRB Review to an External IRB

Your Roadmap to Single IRB Review Serving as a Reviewing IRB

An Author s Guide to Institutional Review Board (IRB)

CONTINUING REVIEW OF APPROVED IRB PROTOCOLS

WORKING WITH THE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD &

Title: EXPEDITED IRB REVIEW OF HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH

CONTINUING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR RENEWAL

Baptist Health Institutional Review Board. Study Closure Report (Expedited Review) IRB #: Study Title:

Collaborative Research

6/19/2014. Children s Hospital of Philadelphia: Recent Changes. Recent Changes in CHOP IRB Procedures

GUIDE TO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOP 801: Investigator Qualifications and Responsibilities

eirb User Manual Kaiser Permanente Institutional Review Boards Georgia Hawaii Northwest

THE DUHS IRB REVIEW PROCESS 8/13/2014

EMERGENCY USE 03/02/2016

Institutional Review Board Submission Requirement Presentation

Submitting Continuing Reviews and/or Amendments to the IRB

Institutional Review Board Standard Operating Procedure. Suspension and Termination of IRB Approval

UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA Institutional Review Board

CUNY HRPP Policy: Suspension or Termination of Human Subject Research

Quick Reference Manual For New DUHS IRB Members

Current Status: Active PolicyStat ID: Origination: 04/2018 Effective: 04/2018 Approved: 04/2018 Last Revised: 04/2018 Expiration: 04/2021

This policy defines the composition and requirements of the North Shore Medical Center (NSMC) Institutional Review Board (IRB) membership.

Review of Research by the Convened IRB

CUNY HRPP Procedures: Multisite Non-Exempt Human Subjects Research

Policy Number: 42 Title: Investigational Devices Date of Last Revision: 06/12/2008; 07/22/2010; 05/29/2013; 05/01/2016; 10/16/2018

Centralized IRB Models

HUMAN SUBJECTS INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD PROCEDURES

University of Cincinnati. Radiation Safety Committee Operations Guidelines Statement of Policy (RSC Guidelines) RSC Guidelines (revision 5)

Signature Date Date First Effective: Signature Date Revision Date: 05/14/2014

Cayuse IRB Policy and Procedure Manual

SOP 407: PROTOCOL DEVIATIONS AND UNANTICIPATED PROBLEMS

Screening and Enrollment Log. List of all subjects screened and all subjects screened and enrolled in the study.

Initial Review of Research Policy and Procedure

Commercial/ Central IRB An independent organization that provides IRB review services

Institutional Review Board (IRB) Policies and Procedures Manual

Obtaining IRB Approval: The eirb Application Process

Independent Ethics Committees

2 Institutional Review Board

Harford Community College. Institutional Review Board Charter and Standard Operating Procedures

USC Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

Yale University Human Research Protection Program

Oklahoma State University Institutional Review Board Standard Operating Procedures

Date Effective 4/21/2008 Identification

Transcription:

IRB Myths & Misconceptions: Myths Busted Kelly Kidner, CIP & Stacie Fujisaki, CIP

General

Myth: The IRB asked me a question; there must be a right and wrong answer OR there must be something wrong. Truth: Usually the IRB asks you questions simply to clarify. Clarifications can frequently impact the level of review required for your study.

Myth: The IRB charges review fees for all studies. Truth: IRB review fees apply ONLY to industrysponsored research.

Myth: I m a student so I don t need to complete responsible conduct in research (RCR) or Conflict of Interest in Research (CoIR) disclosure. Truth: Any person involved in the conduct of research must complete the compliance requirements.

Myth: Only patients are research subjects. Truth: Your target population(s) is/are your research subjects (caregiver, parent/guardian, physician, etc.)

Board/Reviewers

Myth: I have a similar study that was just approved and I used the approved consent form to draft the consent form for my new study submission so this will be approved with minor or no revisions. Truth: A different set of eyes or expertise means a different review.

Myth: Once I submit my study, it will be assigned to the next available agenda. Truth: Your study will be assigned to an agenda based on availability of appropriate expertise.

Myth: Studies can be assigned to a particular analyst. Truth: Studies are assigned to analyst teams based on the day they are received in the pending docket.

IRB Approval

Myth: I see the IRB chair/vice-chair has approved my study so I m good to go. Truth: Wait until you receive the automatic email notice from the eirb system indicating your study was approved. The system sends the notice when the post-approval processing is complete.

Myth: I can send a recruitment email or letter to my patients about my study without obtaining IRB approval of that email or letter because they are my patients. Truth: Recruitment is the first step in the consent process. The IRB must review all recruitment materials and methods.

Myth: Reviewing clinic schedules for potential subjects is not a research activity. Truth: This activity is preparatory to research and requires a prep to research request to meet HIPAA requirements.

Myth: IRB approval is not required if I am using my own data or specimens that already exist. Truth: Human subjects research on any data or specimens requires IRB approval. If data or specimens contain no identifiers (18 HIPAA identifiers) it s likely not human subjects research but we recommend you get a determination letter from the IRB via the Request a Determination submission type.

Myth: My study is expedited, that means it will be approved quick. Truth: In IRB world, expedited is not synonymous with fast. Research in this category is usually investigator-initiated which is the most likely to require lots of clarification.

Myth: My study falls under an exempt category, now I don t even need to finish the application and submit cause I m exempt. Truth: At OHSU, only the IRB can officially determine that your study is exempt FROM FURTHER IRB REVIEW. So finish the application and submit for review.

eirb

Myth: I can call ORIO and have them add me to my PIs study because he needs me to do a continuing review and I don t have access to the study. Truth: The PI must review and approve personnel being added to their study so the IRB requires a modification request for study staff changes.

Myth: My PI is on vacation and a modification needs to be submitted while she is gone; I can call ORIO and have them temporarily switch the PI to one of the coinvestigators so the project can be submitted. Truth: The PI cannot be changed without documentation from the current PI relinquishing responsibilities for the study as well as documentation from the new PI accepting those responsibilities. The eirb is accessible from any internet-capable computer, tablet, or smart phone so there s no excuse.

Myth: My study is complete so I have no further IRB requirements. Truth: When a study is complete a termination request must be submitted. If the PI is no longer at OHSU the responsibility falls to the department and if the study is not terminated by you, this may be administratively done by the IRB. If terminated by IRB, there may be a fee of $550 charged to the PIs department.

Myth: All members of an advisory committee must be listed as co-investigators or study staff on the study. Truth: Only those considered engaged in your research activities need to be listed as coinvestigators or study staff.

Myth: My new research assistant has done all of their compliance requirements so I can add them to my study now. Truth: Completing compliance requirements is great, you re even a few steps ahead of the game -- but the person cannot be added until they have registered for the eirb system.

Myth: My analyst can see projects which have not been submitted by the PI. Truth: The analysts can look up projects not submitted by the PI, but these do not appear in our inbox.

Forms

Myth: All study staff must be listed on the first page of the consent form. Truth: This can be a pretty extensive list and take up the entire first page of the consent form. The PI is required. We recommend that coinvestigators who will consent subjects also be listed, but this is not required.

Myth: The IRB must review every document your sponsor sends you. Truth: There are many documents the IRB does not need to review (CAP certificates, 1572 forms).

Myth: The HIPAA waiver of authorization for my study is only good for a year. Truth: Once approved, the HIPAA waiver of authorization is good for the life of the study. Unless something changes that would affect the criteria for waiver approval or the scope of what the waiver covers.

Myth: PPQs are only for funded studies. Truth: PPQs are required for all human subjects research. Yes, they must be fully signed. Yes, we do check for signatures. No, the analyst doesn t know who should sign for your division and/or department.

IRB Education

Myth: You are on your own to figure out the confusing world of IRB. Truth: In addition to this wonderful Brown Bag, the IRB offers standing Intro to IRB, eirb Basics and eirb Intermediate courses. Also, your amazingly helpful analysts are available to schedule one-on-one meetings with you.

Mark your calendars! Next Brown Bag Session: Repository Refresher February 28 th, 2013 11:30am 12:30pm UHS 8B60 Visit our website for more information: