Lake Michigan Wind Assessment Project Data Summary and Analysis: October 2012

Similar documents
windnavigator Site Analyst Report

WIND DATA REPORT. Paxton, MA

WIND DATA REPORT. Swan s Island, ME

WIND DATA REPORT. Vinalhaven

WIND DATA REPORT. Quincy DPW, MA

WIND DATA REPORT. Mt. Lincoln Pelham, MA

WIND DATA REPORT. Bishop and Clerks

WIND DATA REPORT. Mt. Tom

Wind Resource Assessment for FALSE PASS, ALASKA Site # 2399 Date last modified: 7/20/2005 Prepared by: Mia Devine

WIND DATA REPORT. Ragged Mt Maine

Site Description: Tower Site

NordFoU: External Influences on Spray Patterns (EPAS) Report 16: Wind exposure on the test road at Bygholm

Wind Resource Assessment for NOME (ANVIL MOUNTAIN), ALASKA Date last modified: 5/22/06 Compiled by: Cliff Dolchok

WIND DATA REPORT. Bourne Water District

Design Criteria Data

WIND DATA REPORT. Paxton, MA

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data

Site Summary. Wind Resource Summary. Wind Resource Assessment For King Cove Date Last Modified: 8/6/2013 By: Rich Stromberg & Holly Ganser

A Study of the Normal Turbulence Model in IEC

LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA ANNUAL REPORT. Mass Turnpike Authority Blandford, MA

LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA ANNUAL REPORT. Paxton, MA

Site Description: LOCATION DETAILS Report Prepared By: Tower Site Report Date

WIND DATA REPORT. Mt. Tom

Wind Resource Assessment for DEADHORSE, ALASKA

WIND DATA REPORT. Mass Turnpike Authority Blandford, MA

Wind Project Siting & Resource Assessment

1. The data below gives the eye colors of 20 students in a Statistics class. Make a frequency table for the data.

WIND DATA REPORT. Mass Turnpike Authority Blandford, MA

Visualizing Lake Michigan Wind with SAS Software Aaron C Clark, Grand Valley State University; David Zeitler, Grand Valley State University

Currents measurements in the coast of Montevideo, Uruguay

Kodiak, Alaska Site 1 Wind Resource Report for Kodiak Electric Association

3D Nacelle Mounted Lidar in Complex Terrain

Wind Resource Assessment for SAINT PAUL, ALASKA

National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Wind Resource Data Summary Guam Naval Ordnance Annex Data Summary and Retrieval for November 2009

LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA QUARTERLY REPORT. Bishop and Clerks

Gorge Wind Characteristics in Mountainous Area in South-West China Based on Field Measurement

FINAL WIND DATA REPORT. Mattapoisett Mattapoisett, Massachusetts

Kodiak, Alaska Site 1 Wind Resource Report

WIND DATA REPORT. Mt. Tom

Wind Resource Assessment for KING SALMON, ALASKA

Executive Summary of Accuracy for WINDCUBE 200S

Meteorological Measurements OWEZ

Nanortalik A preliminary analysis of the wind measurements rev 1

WCA Wind Research Project Report

Meteorological Measurements OWEZ

Background Preliminary Review... 3

Wind Resource Assessment for CHEFORNAK, ALASKA

LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA QUARTERLY REPORT. Bishop and Clerks

Draft Kivalina Wind Resource Report

Results and conclusions of a floating Lidar offshore test

LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA ANNUAL REPORT WBZ

Saint Mary s, Alaska Wind Resource Report (for Pitka s Point and Saint Mary s met towers)

Urban Environmental Climate Maps for Urban Planning Considering Urban Heat Island Mitigation in Hiroshima

Torrild - WindSIM Case study

Unit 6 Day 2 Notes Central Tendency from a Histogram; Box Plots

Age of Fans

Wind Data Verification Report Arriga 50m

3D Turbulence at the Offshore Wind Farm Egmond aan Zee J.W. Wagenaar P.J. Eecen

Investigating Wind Flow properties in Complex Terrain using 3 Lidars and a Meteorological Mast. Dimitri Foussekis

LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA QUARTERLY REPORT. Bishop and Clerks

Buckland Wind Resource Report

Wind Assessment Basics

Validation of Measurements from a ZephIR Lidar

LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA ANNUAL REPORT. Bishop & Clerks

Coastal Wave Studies FY13 Summary Report

7 th International Conference on Wind Turbine Noise Rotterdam 2 nd to 5 th May 2017

Wind Characteristics and Wind Potential Assessment for Braşov Region, Romania

Course 1 (18.0 NM) From the start,

Kake, Alaska Wind Resource Report

A Wind Profiling Platform for Offshore Wind Measurements and Assessment. Presenter: Mark Blaseckie AXYS Technologies Inc.

Pitka s Point, Alaska Wind Resource Report

3/6/2001 Fig. 6-1, p.142

FIELD MEASUREMENTS OF SURFACE SUSPENDED SEDIMENT CONCENTRATION IN THE YANGTZE ESTUARY, CHINA

Wind Flow Model of Area Surrounding the Case Western Reserve University Wind Turbine

Mrs. Daniel- AP Stats Ch. 2 MC Practice

Chart Discussion: Fri-25-May-2018 Rainfall Last Week

Chart Discussion: Fri-15-Jun-2018 Rainfall Last Week

Yawing and performance of an offshore wind farm

HOUTEN WIND FARM WIND RESOURCE ASSESSMENT

Activity P07: Acceleration of a Cart (Acceleration Sensor, Motion Sensor)

Global Flow Solutions Mark Zagar, Cheng Hu-Hu, Yavor Hristov, Søren Holm Mogensen, Line Gulstad Vestas Wind & Site Competence Centre, Technology R&D

Wave Energy Resources Assessment for the China Sea Based on AVISO Altimeter and ERA Reanalysis Data (ID:10412)

Wind Project Siting and Permitting Blaine Loos

WindPRO version Nov 2012 Project:

COMPARISON OF CONTEMPORANEOUS WAVE MEASUREMENTS WITH A SAAB WAVERADAR REX AND A DATAWELL DIRECTIONAL WAVERIDER BUOY

Assessing wind energy potential for vertical axis wind turbines on the Tilikum Crossing

Appendix SEA Seattle, Washington 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

PARK - Main Result Calculation: PARK calculation (5 x 166m, + LT CORR + MITIGATION) N.O. Jensen (RISØ/EMD)

Yawing and performance of an offshore wind farm

APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX D APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G SEDIMENT ANALYSIS APPENDIX A WAVE & SEDIMENT MODELS CRYSTAL BALL ANALYSIS

1700 Webster Street Oakland, CA. Final Report. Pedestrian Wind Conditions Consultation Wind Tunnel Tests RWDI # July 16, 2015

Chart Discussion: Fri-17-Aug-2018 (Harvey Stern) Combining Forecasts (Apr 13th to Aug 15th)

where ρ f is the density of the fluid, V is the submerged volume of the object, and g is the acceleration due to gravity.

Highway & Transportation (I) ECIV 4333 Chapter (4): Traffic Engineering Studies. Spot Speed

Measured wake losses By Per Nielsen

Windcube FCR measurements

Review of the Typhoon Season Macao, China

Appendix MSP Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

Wind Energy Assessment using a Wind Turbine with Dynamic Yaw Control

Transcription:

Grand Valley State University ScholarWorks@GVSU Monthly Buoy Report Offshore Wind Project 1-1- Lake Michigan Wind Assessment Project Data Summary and Analysis: October Lake Michigan Offshore Wind Assessment Project Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/windbuoyreports Recommended Citation Lake Michigan Offshore Wind Assessment Project, "Lake Michigan Wind Assessment Project Data Summary and Analysis: October " (). Monthly Buoy Report. Paper 4. http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/windbuoyreports/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Offshore Wind Project at ScholarWorks@GVSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Monthly Buoy Report by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@GVSU. For more information, please contact scholarworks@gvsu.edu.

Lake Michigan Wind Assessment Project Data Summary and Analysis October

This report summarizes the data collected by the Laser Wind Sensor (LWS) #8 with collection information as follows. Location: Date: Cup Anemometer: Range Gates 1-6: Observations: Number of Observations: Lake Michigan Mid-lake Plateau (432.515N 877.12W) October 1 through October 31, (UTC) 3 meters mounted on the buoy 75, 9, 15, 125, 15, 175 meters 1-minute averages, down sampled one per hour from data collected and stored on the buoy 31 days at 24 observations per day = 744 observations Missing Observations: Start End Date Time Date Time Number Missing 1-Oct : 1-Oct 11: 12 3-Oct : 4-Oct 2: 45 11-Oct 16: 15-Oct : 81 Good Observations: 66 (81.5%) Notes: o o Range Gate 6 (175 meters) is a test range gate to observe the performance of the sensor at the extreme operating height limit for this configuration. Thus, performance degradation was expected. All high resolution 1 second data for all wind speeds is stored onboard the buoy and can be used for further detailed post processing as required. Graphs for wind speed for ranges gates 1, 3, 4, and 5 as well as the cup anemometer follow. Graphs of the horizontal wind direction at the cup anemometer and range gate 1 are included as well. The graphs are for October 1 through October 1. GVSU Lake Michigan Wind Assessment October 2

GVSU Lake Michigan Wind Assessment October 3

GVSU Lake Michigan Wind Assessment October 4

GVSU Lake Michigan Wind Assessment October 5

Summary statistics for wind speed by range gate and for the cup anemometer are shown in the following tables. Good observations are 1-minute averages consisting of at least 3 one-second observations. There were 66 hours with one 1-minute average recorded. Table 1: (meters per second) Statistics by Range Gate N1S7P6 Wind Speed Cup Anemometer N1S9P83 RG #1 N1S9P85 RG #3 N1S9P86 RG #4 N1S9P87 RG #5 Statistic Good Observations 66 536 573 341 % of Total (66) 1.%.4% 94.6% 83.5%.3% 8.5 11. 11.5 11.4 11.7 Standard Deviation 3.9 5.6 5.7 5.8 6. Minimum.4.7.7.7.6 1st quartile 5.8 7. 7.6 7.2 6.9 Median 8.4 1.5 1.9 1.7 11.7 3rd quartile 11.1 14.6 15.1 15.3 16.4 Maximum 19.2 25.5 26.7 26.9 27.1 99% CI for Mean Lower Bound 8.1 1.4 1.9 1.7 1.9 99% CI for Mean Upper Bound 8.9 11.6 12.1 12. 12.6 Table 2: (meters per second) Frequencies by Range Gate N1S7P6 Wind Speed Cup Anemometer N1S9P83 RG #1 N1S9P85 RG #3 N1S9P86 RG #4 N1S9P87 RG #5 Range -4 12.7% 1.4% 9.2% 1.1% 1.3% 4-8 34.% 24.4% 2.9% 22.7% 22.3% 8-12 36.3% 23.7% 26.7% 24.7% 19.1% 12-16 12.9% 22.% 22.% 2.4% 22.3% 16-2 4.1% 12.1% 12.2% 12.6% 16.7% 2-24.% 6.2% 7.3% 8.3% 7.9% 24-28.% 1.1% 1.6% 1.2% 1.5% 28-32.%.%.%.%.% GVSU Lake Michigan Wind Assessment October 6

Table 3: Wind Direction Frequencies and Speed by Range Gate N1S9P89 Wind Direction RG#1 N1S9P83 RG#1 Wind Direction Range (Degrees) 45 (NNE) 9.9% 7.5 45 9 (NE) 2.4% 2.3 9 135 (SE).9%.2 135 18 (SSE) 11.8% 9.5 18 225 (SSW) 27.8% 11.9 225 27 (SW) 9.3% 8.1 27 315 (NW) 14.2% 9.6 315 36 (NNW) 23.7% 9.3 Notes for October: 1. The average wind speed for ranges gates 1, 3, 4, and 5 appears to be equivalent. However, the average wind speed for range gate 1 may be slightly less. The difference in the averages between range gate 1 and range gate 3 of.5m/sec is statistically significant (α =.1). 2. The same pattern indicating equivalent wind speed at range gates 1, 3, 4, and 5 is seen in the other summary statistics, as well as the distribution of wind speeds. 3. The distribution of the wind speeds shows more values in the 4-8m/sec range, the 8-12m/sec range, and the 12-16m/sec range together for all range gates. 4. Ranges gates 1, 3, 4, and 5 have higher average wind speeds than the cup anemometer. The difference in the averages between the cup anemometer and range gate 4 of 2.8m/sec is statistically significant (α =.1). 5. The most prevalent wind direction is 18 225 degrees (SSW). Almost 5% percent of the time, the wind direction is between 135 and 27 degrees (SSE to SW). 6. About 28% of the time, the wind direction is between 18 and 225 degrees (SSW) and the average wind speed in this direction appears to be higher than the overall average of 11.m/sec for range gate 1. GVSU Lake Michigan Wind Assessment October 7

Notes comparing September and October: 1. The average October wind speed is significantly greater than the September wind speed. This is seen in the average, the median, the 1 st quartile, and the maximum. 2. The variability of the wind seems to be higher in October than September, as seen in the standard deviation and in the frequencies. 3. Approximately 5% of the time in October the wind direction was between 135 and 27 degrees (SSW to SSW). In September, about 42% of the wind came from this direction. 4. There appears to be a shift in wind direction away from -135 degrees (NNE to SE) and toward 135-36 degrees (SSE to NNW) in October versus September. In September, about 3% of the time the wind direction was between -135. In October, about 13% of the wind came from this direction. GVSU Lake Michigan Wind Assessment October 8

Part II Buoy Stored Data This report summarizes the data collected by the Laser Wind Sensor (LWS) #8 with collection information as follows. Location: Date: Range Gates 1-6: Cup Anemometer: Observations: Number of Observations: Lake Michigan Mid-lake Plateau (432.51N 877.257W) October 1 through October 31, (UTC) 75, 9, 15, 125, 15, 175 meters 3 meters mounted on the buoy 1-minute averages, stored on the buoy and retrieved manually 31 days at 24 X 6 observations per day = 44 observations Missing Observations: As shown in table 4. Good Observations: As shown in table 4. Table 4 shows information concerning the horizontal wind speed and the energy generated for each range gate. The amount of energy generated depends on the turbine employed in this case the Gamesa Elioca G58 85kW. The energy estimate was computed assuming that the turbine will always face the wind. The wind rose graphs show the wind speed by direction as well as the percent of time the wind was blowing in each direction. Range Gate Table 4: (meters per second) and Energy (kwh/time unit) by Range Gate Number of Obs. (Possible = 44) % Good Obs. Wind Speed Wind Speed -- 1 Obs. per hour Wind Speed -- Difference Power (kw) Daily Energy (kwh) 1 3831 85.8% 1.7 11.3 51 12229 2 493 91.7% 11.1 4 12573 3 48 91.4% 11.2 11.5.3 1 125 4 362 81.1% 11. 11.4.4 499 115 5 2497 55.9% 11.5 11.7.2 1 12511 6 1628 36.5% 11.5 518 32 Buoy Cup 4458 99.9% 8.5 8.3 -.2 431 1346 GVSU Lake Michigan Wind Assessment October 9

38 312316 34 3 2 2 2 2 28 2 2 2 2 26 2 2 24 22 32 3243 34 344348 33 3 25 2 15 1 28 24 21 111 5 4 8 12 16 28 3 4 6 8 1 14 18 12 14 1 16 1 111 18 average speed (mph) per direction bin 38 312316 34 3 2 2 2 2 28 2 2 2 2 26 2 2 24 22 32 3243 34 344348 33 16.% 14.% 12.% 1.% 8.% 6.% 4.% 2.%.% 28 24 21 111 4 8 12 16 28 3 4 6 8 1 14 18 12 14 1 16 1 111 18 percent time per direction bin Range Gate 1: and Percent Time by Direction GVSU Lake Michigan Wind Assessment October 1

38 312316 34 3 2 2 2 2 28 2 2 2 2 26 2 2 24 22 32 3243 34 344348 33 3 25 2 15 1 28 24 21 111 5 4 8 12 16 28 3 4 6 8 1 14 18 12 14 1 16 1 111 18 average speed (mph) per direction bin 38 312316 34 3 2 2 2 2 28 2 2 2 2 26 2 2 24 22 32 3243 34 344348 33 16.% 14.% 12.% 1.% 8.% 6.% 4.% 2.%.% 28 24 21 111 4 8 12 16 28 3 4 6 8 1 14 18 12 14 1 16 1 111 18 percent time per direction bin Range Gate 2: and Percent Time by Direction GVSU Lake Michigan Wind Assessment October 11

38 312316 34 3 2 2 2 2 28 2 2 2 2 26 2 2 24 22 32 3243 34 344348 33 3 25 2 15 1 28 24 21 111 5 4 8 12 16 28 3 4 6 8 1 14 18 12 14 1 16 1 111 18 average speed (mph) per direction bin 38 312316 34 3 2 2 2 2 28 2 2 2 2 26 2 2 24 22 32 3243 34 344348 33 16.% 14.% 12.% 1.% 8.% 6.% 4.% 2.%.% 28 24 21 111 4 8 12 16 28 3 4 6 8 1 14 18 12 14 1 16 1 111 18 percent time per direction bin Range Gate 3: and Percent Time by Direction GVSU Lake Michigan Wind Assessment October 12

324 312 31632 38 34 3 2 2 2 2 28 2 2 2 2 26 2 2 24 22 34 344348 33 35 3 25 2 15 1 28 24 21 1 11 5 4 8 12 16 28 3 4 6 8 1 14 18 12 14 1 16 111 1 18 average speed (mph) per direction bin 38 312316 34 3 2 2 2 2 28 2 2 2 2 26 2 2 24 22 32 3243 34 344348 33 16.% 14.% 12.% 1.% 8.% 6.% 4.% 2.%.% 28 24 21 111 4 8 12 16 28 3 4 6 8 1 14 18 12 14 1 16 1 111 18 percent time per direction bin Range Gate 4: and Percent Time by Direction GVSU Lake Michigan Wind Assessment October 13

38 312316 34 3 2 2 2 2 28 2 2 2 2 26 2 2 24 22 32 3243 34 344348 33 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 28 24 21 111 5 4 8 12 16 28 3 4 6 8 1 14 18 12 14 1 16 1 111 18 average speed (mph) per direction bin 4 8 14.% 12 34 344348 33 162 24 283 32 324 12.% 4 38 312316 1.% 34 8.% 3 6 2 6.% 2 2 4.% 2 28 8 2.% 2 2.% 2 2 26 1 2 14 2 18 24 12 22 14 28 1 24 2 16 11 11 11 11 18 percent time per direction bin Range Gate 5: and Percent Time by Direction GVSU Lake Michigan Wind Assessment October 14

38 312316 34 3 2 2 2 2 28 2 2 2 2 26 2 2 24 22 32 3243 34 344348 33 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 28 24 21 111 5 4 8 12 16 28 3 4 6 8 1 14 18 12 14 1 16 1 111 18 average speed (mph) per direction bin 38 312316 34 3 2 2 2 2 28 2 2 2 2 26 2 2 24 22 32 3243 34 344348 33 9.% 8.% 7.% 6.% 5.% 4.% 3.% 2.% 1.%.% 28 24 21 111 4 8 12 16 28 3 4 6 8 1 14 18 12 14 1 16 1 111 18 percent time per direction bin Range Gate 6: and Percent Time by Direction GVSU Lake Michigan Wind Assessment October 15

38 312316 34 3 2 2 2 2 28 2 2 2 2 26 2 2 24 22 32 3243 34 344348 33 3 25 2 15 1 28 24 21 111 5 4 8 12 16 28 3 4 6 8 1 14 18 12 14 1 16 1 111 18 average speed (mph) per direction bin 38 312316 34 3 2 2 2 2 28 2 2 2 2 26 2 2 24 22 32 3243 34 344348 33 14.% 12.% 1.% 8.% 6.% 4.% 2.%.% 28 24 21 111 4 8 12 16 28 3 4 6 8 1 14 18 12 14 1 16 1 111 18 percent time per direction bin Buoy Cup Anemometer: and Percent Time by Direction GVSU Lake Michigan Wind Assessment October 16

Notes: 1. Based on the percent of good observations in Table 4, performance appears to be degraded for range gates 5 and 6. This was expected for range gate 6 which is experimental. To demonstrate reliability, the results for range gate 5 need further investigation. 2. Energy potential ranges from 12. to 12.6 megawatts hours per day, about 1/3 rd more megawatts hours per day than in September. 3. The energy potential of the wind at the surface as measured by the cup anemometer on the buoy is about 8% of the energy potential at the higher elevations. The average wind speed is about 2/3rds of that at the higher elevations. 4. The average wind speed estimated by six 1-minute averages per hour and one 1-minute average per hour are the equivalent. The maximum difference is about.4 m/s about 4%. Differences in variability estimates are yet to be explored. 5. The highest average wind speed is in the southwest direction, which is the same direction from which the greatest percent of the wind comes. GVSU Lake Michigan Wind Assessment October 17