ARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT. March 20, 2012

Similar documents
Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. Springdale Chamber of Commerce Leadership Springdale Tuesday, February 3, 2015

Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. Hot Springs Village Kiwanis Club

Where We Were. CRFB.org

Finance & Insurance Committee Item 8 February 12, 2018

San Francisco s Capital Plan & the Mayor s Transportation Task Force 2030: Funding the next steps for transportation

Capital Beltway HOT Lanes - Frequently Asked Questions

Mobility Greater Johnson County Transportation Coalition. May 23, 2018

Turnpike System Projected Debt Service Coverage Ratio ($000)*

NEED FOR ADDITIONAL FUNDING

Secondary Road Program

2045 Long Range Transportation Plan. Summary of Draft

Tax Reform in a Trump World

JONESBORO HIGHWAY 63 HIGHWAY 18 CONNECTOR STUDY

August 12, The Honorable Edmund G. Brown Jr. Governor, State of California State Capitol Sacramento, CA Dear Governor Brown:

Donald W. Reynolds Razorback Stadium North End Zone Addition and Stadium Updates JUNE 2016

DES MOINES AREA MPO. Presentation to Iowa Commercial Real Estate Association. April 6, 2017

What if YOU could help plan Northern Virginia s transportation future?

Transportation in Washoe County. Lee Gibson, Executive Director February 15, 2011

2016 I-30 CROSSING ARKANSAS BOULEVARD KEY IDEAS OF PLAN B:

Theodore Roosevelt Expressway (TRE) study was completed in Conducted Public meetings Analyzed traffic Provided good information

BMO Capital Markets Annual Infrastructure & Utilities Conference 407 International February 8, 2018

Typical Rush Hour Commute. PennyforTransportation.com

Executive Summary June 2015

Long-Range Financial Plan Implications of Revised Sales Tax Projections for DART

Route 58 Corridor Development Fund

January 22, Steve Salwei, NDDOT

North Carolina Transportation Issues

Preview. Tables in your paper Mass Transit as alternative to auto California s problems in urban transportation

Florida s Turnpike System Projected Debt Service Coverage Ratio ($000)*

Traffic Engineer s Annual Report

Nevada s Transportation Infrastructure and Future Transportation Needs

INTERSTATE 540 IMPROVEMENT STUDY

Arkansas DU News. State Chairman s Corner Arkansas DU Leadership Conference

Basalt Creek Transportation Refinement Plan Recommendations

The I-680 Southbound Express Lane

395 Express Lanes Extension

2040 RTP. Chapter 6: Investments in our Transportation Future

LAKE BLUFF PARK DISTRICT BLAIR PARK SWIMMING POOL Questions and Answers OVERVIEW

Regulations Governing Interscholastic Competition. This brochure is provided for member schools participating in interscholastic tennis by the

Program Update. Relationship: RP, RTIP, Budget, POF. Board of Directors Item 16 February 22, Board of Directors Item 16 Feb 22,

SUMMARY OF TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENTS

Board of Directors. March 8, March 8, Board. Item 9-2, 1

County of Fairfax, Virginia. Department of Transportation

City of Atlanta-MARTA Sales Tax Referendum Draft Project List. Atlanta City Council Work Session May 19, 2016

2012 PRIORITY TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS

Private-Public Partnership. Presentation to Metropolitan Council October 2, 2017

Transportation Authority of Marin Renew Existing ½-cent Transportation Sales Tax

Preview. Second midterm Tables in your paper Mass Transit as alternative to auto California s problems in urban transportation

Report on the Elimination of Toll Roads. HB 2612, 84th Texas Legislature

Maryland State Highway Mobility Report. Morteza Tadayon

Engineering - Bicycle and Pedestrian

APPENDIX G: INTERSECTION NEEDS AT OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD

Highway User Fee Funding Of Local Roads in Illinois. NOT Equitable. NOT Sustainable. October 20, 2015

The Transportation Improvement Program

CITY OF PORTSMOUTH PLANNING DEPARTMENT

Attachment One. Integration of Performance Measures Into the Bryan/College Station MPO FY 2019 FY 2022 Transportation Improvement Program

Sound Transit Financing and 3-County Road & Transit Funding

New Mexico Transportation Funding Challenges

Transportation Day at the Capitol. Charlie Zelle Commissioner, MnDOT Feb. 16, 2017

Prepared For: DIRECTION 2035 SHAPING OUR FUTURE SUMMARY REPORT JULY Prepared By: Staff to Bay County TPO

The third deficit: Illinois transportation crisis

Regulations Governing Interscholastic Competition. This brochure is provided for member schools participating in interscholastic tennis by the

Welcome. Thank you for your interest in the Lewis & Clark Viaduct Concept Study

The Herzliya Conference The Economic Dimension Prof. Rafi Melnick Provost, Interdisciplinary Center (IDC) Herzliya

I-10 Bypass Project Banning to Cabazon

Education Committee Economic Background and Issue Review

UPC Design / CN Locally Administered PE Phase VDOT Administered CN Phase

405 Express Lanes General Information & Frequently Asked Questions

STATE TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION HEARING

Working Draft: Gaming Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue. Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition

HSM PREDICTIVE METHODS IN PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING

Merced County Association of Governments: Voter Survey

Managed Lanes 2017: What They Are and How They Work. Robert W. Poole, Jr. Director of Transportation Policy Reason Foundation

Otter Tail County 2040 Transportation Plan. Asset Management Peer Exchange

TIP/RTP Amendment #3 Update. Transportation Coordinating Committee March 17, 2017

P.O. Box 1749 Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3A5 Canada Item No. Halifax Regional Council January 16, 2017

Highway 217 Corridor Study. Phase I Overview Report

I-20 ODESSA-MIDLAND CORRIDOR STUDY. Public Meeting for Schematic Design

Transportation Enhancements, Safe Routes to School, and Recreational Trails to Transportation Alternatives. Pamela Liston, October 30 th, 2013

November 14, Dulles To DC Loop Public-Private Partnership Proposal. Executive Summary

Proposed Project I 35 from Denton to Cooke County Line

DALLAS MIDTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOCUS NORTH TEXAS Peer Chacko, AICP, Assistant Director, City of Dallas

% of Sales Tax (net of Admin) First Year Amount. Metro State of Good Repair 2% $ 17 $ 350 $ 910 $ 1,140 $ 2,400

The Toll Industry of the Future: Looking Ahead to 2030

TORONTO MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 30, DEBENTURE AND OTHER BORROWING. Chapter 30 DEBENTURE AND OTHER BORROWING. ARTICLE I General

7. COST ESTIMATES AND FUNDING

New Measure A Expenditure Categories DEFINITIONS OF ELIGIBLE EXPENDITURES Adopted March 8, 2007

The total net revenue to the City for the previous four fiscal years was $255,856.

Light Rail Proposal. June 13, 2016 Presentation for the Joint Sustainability Committee by the Central Austin Community Development Corporation

Chapter 5 Future Transportation

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

Small Business Dynamics and Job Creation. Small Business Numbers, Pretty Pictures and Not So Pretty Pictures

What are Managed Lanes?

PRFSC Feb 2017 Meeting Minutes

The U.S. Economy How Serious A Downturn? Nigel Gault Group Managing Director North American Macroeconomic Services

The Economics of Public Policy 2. Government Revenue and Expenditure in the USA and elsewhere

City Avenue Projects

Big Changes, Unknown Impacts

The Israeli Economy 2009 The Caesarea Center Conference

ARKANSAS SCHOLARSHIP LOTTERY PLAYERS WIN $2.4 MILLION+ IN JUNE

Transcription:

ARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT March 20, 2012

SIZE OF HIGHWAY SYSTEMS Arkansas 16,416 miles (Arkansas ranks 12 th nationally) Illinois California New York Tennessee 16,161 miles 15,225 miles 15,033 miles 13,793 miles Arkansas ranks 43 rd in Total Highway User Revenue per Mile

Average Annual Construction Funds Available to AHTD Fiscal Years 2005 2009 (SAFETEA-LU) Federal Funds State Highway Funds Total Federal and State Highway Funds Less Non-AHTD Federal Funds, Non-Construction Programs, and Federal Obligation Limitation Less State Funds for Fixed Expenditures and Match for non-construction Federal-aid Less Federal and State Commitment for Interstate Rehabilitation Program Bond Debt Federal and State Funds Highway Construction Funds Specific to Categories (Little or No Commission Discretion) Highway Construction Funds Available For Commission Prioritization $505 million $393 million $898 million ($149 million) ($264 million) ($74 million) $411 million $144 million $267 million

1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Millions of Dollars State General Revenues vs. Gross State Highway Revenues Arkansas State General Revenues vs AHTD Net Highway Revenues $6,000 $5,000 $4,000 $3,000 $2,000 $1,000 $0 Fiscal Year ARKANSAS STATE GENERAL REVENUES AHTD NET HIGHWAY REVENUES Excludes County & City aid funds Prepared by: Planning and Research 1/24/2012

Total Cost for Highway Needs and Other Improvements Congestion Relief..$3.7 billion Maintaining the System.$10.9 billion Congressionally-Designated High Priority Corridors $7.5 billion Econ. Development Connectors..$1.6 billion Total Needs and Other Improvements....$23.7 billion

Funding vs. Needs over a 10-year period Highway System Needs $23.7 billion Projected Highway funding $ 4.1 billion Discrepancy $19.6 billion

ARKANSAS PRIMARY HIGHWAY NETWORK

4-Lane Highway System 4-Lane Grid $7.8 billion Regional Connectors $0.6 billion Econ. Dev. Connectors TOTAL $0.3 billion $8.7 billion

Regional Corridor Projects

Highway 167

Highway 167

Highway 82

El Dorado Highways 82/82B/167B

Highway 79

I-69 Corridor

I-69 Connector

2011 Interstate Rehabilitation Program

Timeline April 2011 November 2011 December 2011 Currently Late 2012 (tentative) RFPs for design consultants Contract signed with Financial Advisor Agreements signed with 10 design firms Assigning projects to design firms Issue bonds and let first contracts

2011 Interstate Rehabilitation Program Map

INTERSTATE CONDITION

Temporary 0.5% Sales Tax (Issue #1) November 6, 2012 election ballot Temporary Increase $230m annually ($160m/$35m/$35m) State Aid Street Fund for City Streets

Temporary 0.5% Sales Tax (Issue #1) Bond debt retired over 10 years $1.3 Billion in general obligation bonds Tax expires when the bonds are retired Four-lane highways $1.8 Billion total program

Benefits of Temporary 0.5% Tax Completion of widening U. S. Highway 167 to four lanes between I-530 and El Dorado; Beginning the widening of U. S. Highway 82 to four lanes between Texarkana and El Dorado; Completion of widening U. S. Highway 425 to four lanes from Hamburg to the Louisiana state line;

Union County Benefits (est. annual) (est. 10-year) Union County $558,640 $5,586,395 Calion $8,799 $87,992 El Dorado $336,363 $3,363,633 Felsenthal $2,672 $26,718 Huttig $10,634 $106,338 Junction City $10,349 $103,488 Norphlet $15,033 $150,334 Smackover $33,220 $332,195 Strong $9,939 $99,391

Benefits of Temporary 0.5% Tax Completion of widening I-540 to six lanes between Fayetteville and Bentonville; Completion of the initial two lanes of the ultimate four lanes of the Bella Vista Bypass (Future I-49); Beginning the four-lane construction of the U.S. Highway 412 Bypass (Springdale) from I-540 westward to XNA Connector;

Benefits of Temporary 0.5% Tax Completion of widening I-40 to six lanes between Conway and North Little Rock; Completion of widening U.S. Highway 67 to six lanes from Jacksonville to Cabot; Improvements to I-30 connecting Little Rock and North Little Rock, including widening Arkansas River bridge;

Benefits of Temporary 0.5% Tax Completion of widening U. S. Highway 64 to four lanes between Conway and Beebe; Completion of widening Highway 18 to four lanes between Jonesboro and Blytheville; Continuation of widening U. S. Highway 65 to four lanes from Clinton northward; Continuation of widening U. S. Highway 65 to four lanes from Bellefonte southward;

Benefits of Temporary 0.5% Tax Continuation of widening U. S. Highway 49 to four lanes from Brinkley southward toward Helena-West Helena; Continuation of widening U. S. Highway 270 to four lanes from Hot Springs westward; Completion of widening U. S. Highway 70 to four lanes between I-30 and Hot Springs; Completion of widening U. S. Highway 412 to four lanes between Paragould and Walnut Ridge.

CHALLENGES 12 th in system size but 43 rd in revenue Funding system flawed Making good use of what we have 4 Lane Grid System needed for safety, mobility and economic development Meeting expectations is difficult