Economic value of Icelandic salmon (Salmo salar L.) in angling and net fisheries

Similar documents
Freshwater Fisheries in Iceland

Independent Economic Analysis Board. Review of the Estimated Economic Impacts of Salmon Fishing in Idaho. Task Number 99

Not to be cited without permission Working paper 2002/22

ATLANTIC SALMON NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR, SALMON FISHING AREAS 1-14B. The Fisheries. Newfoundland Region Stock Status Report D2-01

Hunter and Angler Expenditures, Characteristics, and Economic Effects, North Dakota,

San Patricio County Guided Fishing Market Research

Economic Analysis of Marine Recreational Fishing at NOAA Fisheries

NASCO Guidelines for the Management of Salmon Fisheries

Nueces County Guided Fishing Market Research

A SURVEY OF 1997 COLORADO ANGLERS AND THEIR WILLINGNESS TO PAY INCREASED LICENSE FEES

Economic Contribution of the 2018 Recreational Red Snapper Season in the South Atlantic

5. purse seines 3 000

The Economic Benefits of Hunting and Fishing Activities in Alberta in 2008

OR DUNGENESS CRAB FISHERY:

The University of Georgia

Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife: Inland Fisheries - Hatchery Management

Emergency Action on Regulations

Angler Use, Harvest and Economic Assessment on Trout Stocked Streams in Pennsylvania

Discussion Paper: Consideration of a Registration for Self-Guided Halibut Rental Boats

Angling in Manitoba (2000)

Good morning and welcome to Norway and Molde! Let me start with reminding us all why we are here.

Recreational Fishing License Sales in Florida:

Published by: Fisheries and Oceans Canada. Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0E6. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2019

Prince William Sound Aquaculture Corporation Economic Impact Update for 2010

Loughs Agency Gníomhaireacht na Lochanna Factrie fur Loughs

The UK Experience with use of Triploids for Restocking

Economic Impact of Hunting Expenditures on Southern U.S

SUSTAINABLE FISHING. Labor s plan for fishing in Queensland

Socioeconomic Profile and Spatial Analysis of Fisheries in the three central California National Marine Sanctuaries

EFFECTS OF IMPORT AND INVENTORY AMOUNTS ON CHANGES IN WHOLESALE PRICES OF SALMON IN JAPAN

British Columbia's Fisheries & Aquaculture Sector May 2001

Final Report, October 19, Socioeconomic characteristics of reef users

P.O.Box 23 Sw an Reach 3903 Victoria Phone E m ail- bigpond.com

Best Practice Guidance for Assessing the Financial Performance of Fishing Gear: Industry-led gear trials

Fishery. Fishing vessels (Dept. of Finance)

How to Explain Car Rental to Banks and Investors

Council CNL(11)35. Annual Report on Actions Taken Under Implementation Plans. EU - France

The Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Salmon and the Pelagic Fisheries in the North- East Atlantic: A Potential for By-catch?

Grassroots Advocacy Kit Inside. National Allied Golf Associations

Fee-Fishing. An Introduction. Charles E. Cichra, Michael P. Masser and Ronnie J. Gilbert*

Appendix G Coastal Demographic and Economic Trends Additional Figures

DSBG Findings Helping Fishermen and Policy Makers Explore the Economics of Deep Set Buoy Gear in the West Coast Swordfish Fishery

(Tabled by the Russian Federation)

Fish Migration. 5th International Rhine Symposium Beethovenhalle Bonn 2-4 November Orri Vigfússon, Chairman, North Atlantic Salmon Fund

Overfishing Atlantic Bluefin Tuna

DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2017/2120(INI)

Evaluation of effects of management options for the recreational cod fishery in the western Baltic Sea

Golfers in Colorado: The Role of Golf in Recreational and Tourism Lifestyles and Expenditures

Fisheries Statistics Salmonid and freshwater fisheries statistics for England and Wales

Winter 2015/ Halibut & Blackcod Market Bulletin

FLEET ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE DATASET

Loughs Agency Gníomhaireacht na Lochanna Factrie fur Loughs

Salmon Five Point Approach restoring salmon in England

Fishery. Harvesting. Snow Crab Professional Fish Harvesters Certification Board

Basic Wage for Soccer Players in Japan :

An Empirical Analysis of Hunting Lease Pricing and Value of G

The Economic Impacts of Carolina Beach Inlet Navigability

ECONOMIC IMPACTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS OF SPORTFISHING IN ALASKA

15, 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

FISH COMMUNITIES AND FISHERIES OF THE THOUSAND ISLANDS AND MIDDLE CORRIDOR

The Economic Impact of Recreational Fishing in the Everglades Region

The profitability analysis of artisanal fishing in Asa River of Kwara state, Nigeria

Summer Flounder. Wednesday, April 26, Powered by

OREGON AND WASHINGTON DEPARTMENTS OF FISH AND WILDLIFE JOINT STAFF REPORT: SUMMER FACT SHEET NO. 1 Columbia River Compact June 13, 2012

The Economics of Atlantic Highly Migratory Species For-Hire Fishing Trips July - November 2013 Clifford Hutt and George Silva

STORY AND PHOTOS BY DAVID MCRAE

FORMERLY THE NATIONAL COALITION FOR MARINE CONSERVATION (NCMC) Billfish Conservation Act Implementing Regulations; NOAA-NMFS

Recreational fisheries in the coastal areas of the Baltic Sea

Economic Impact Analysis BOONE DOCKS RESORT AND MARINA, LLC

COASTAL CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION

Effects of Common Economic Space Creation

PRESENTATION TO THE BRITISH COLUMBIA LEGISALTIVE STANDING COMMITTEE ON FINANCE September 26, 2013

Conditions of Issue Game Licence

In July 2010 we consulted the Local Fishery Advisory Groups (LFAG) on proposed changes to fishing byelaws in North Wales. The main aims were to:

Fishing Industry in Prince Edward Island January 2009

VALUES ASSOCIATED WITH THE APALACHICOLA BAY MARINE ECONOMY

International cooperation on the conservation & restoration of wild Atlantic salmon the work of NASCO

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South

WHERE ARE ARIZONA DEMOGRAPHICS TAKING US? HOW GROWING SLOWER, OLDER AND MORE DIVERSE AFFECTS REAL ESTATE

New Sportfishing Data and Industry Trends

Agriculture and the Economy: A View from the Chicago Fed

Angling in Manitoba Survey of Recreational Angling

Key words: Economic multiplier, community tourism, walking street, Chiang Mai

Law Enforcement Training. Limitations

The Economic Impacts of Recreational Fishing in the Matagorda Bay System

The Economic Impacts of Recreational Fishing in the San Antonio Bay System

Nancy E. Kohler, Danielle Bailey, Patricia A. Turner, and Camilla McCandless SEDAR34-WP-25. Submitted: 10 June 2013

Fish Conservation and Management

The Role of the Recreational Angler in Fisheries Monitoring, Research and Management

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION AND FISHERIES IN BELARUS October 28-31, 2013, St. Petersburg. Ministry of Agriculture and Food of the Republic of Belarus

J. Kappel, EAA - EFTTA ICES-WGRFS 7-11 May 2012 Jan Kappel, European Anglers Alliance (EAA), and European Fishing Tackle Trade Association (EFTTA)

OCTOBER 2008 BLUEFIN TUNA SUPPLY, DEMAND, AND MARKET OF JAPAN

ANALYZING THE SHIP DISPOSAL OPTIONS

IOTC-2016-WPTT18-INFO3 Received: 4 November 2016

THE IMPACT OF RECREATIONAL CRABBING ON NORTH CAROLINA S CRAB POPULATION

Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission

Hydraulic and Economic Analysis of Real Time Control

IP(08)03. Fisheries Management Focus Area Report. European Union - Finland

3. DYNAMICS OF GLOBAL CLIMATIC INDICES AND MAIN COMMERCIAL CATCHES

LAKE WASHINGTON SOCKEYE SALMON STUDIES. Richard E. Thorne and James J. Dawson

Transcription:

Technical Workshop on Social and Economic Values of Atlantic Salmon Economic value of Icelandic salmon (Salmo salar L.) in angling and net fisheries by Árni Ísaksson and Sumarliði Óskarsson Directorate of Freshwater Fisheries Vagnhöfði 7, 110 Reykjavík Iceland Introduction The Standing Committee on the Precautionary Approach (SCPA) of NASCO recognised at its meeting in Ottawa in February 2001 that there were gaps in the knowledge about the true social and economic values of wild Atlantic salmon. It was also stressed that such values were important in relation to management decisions taken under a precautionary approach. NASCO Council subsequently decided to hold a Technical Workshop on Social and Economic Values of Atlantic Salmon and encouraged its Contracting Parties to provide relevant information for their respective areas. Although commercial netting of salmon in the sea has been prohibited within Iceland s territorial waters for over 80 years, salmon were traditionally caught in set nets in large glacial mainstem rivers. Although most of the netting has been eliminated through rental agreements there is still some in-river netting for salmon on Iceland s south coast. Angling for Atlantic salmon in Iceland has been growing steadily for the last 50 years and is now a higly valuable fishery. It has been roughly estimated that direct and indirect revenues from the Icelandic angling catch of approximately 30.000 salmon amount to US $ 30 million, which corresponds to $ 1000 per angled salmon. The purpose ot this paper is to provide best estimates regarding the value of salmon in sports fisheries based on angling information for the last 5 years. The value of commercially netted salmon is also compared to that of angled salmon. No attempt was made to estimate the aesthetic or socioeconomic value of salmon to environmental groups or laymen, which would have been difficult to estimate in monetary terms. Methods The value of salmon differs depending on the user group. The value is thus different to a river owner, who gets a direct income from the resource, than to an angler, which appreciates the recreational value but wants to keep price of licences low. The value of salmon was thus calculated in two ways. Firstly as a direct revenue to river owners and secondly as a gross value to the Icelandic economy. The Federation of Icelandic River Associations has for a number of years estimated the value of the salmon resource to its members using revenue and catch data for 16 Icelandic rivers, 8 rivers with an average catch ranging from 700 to 1900 salmon and 8 with a catch ranging from 100 to 500 salmon. This method gives fairly exact information as outfitters and angling clubs frequently rent the angling rights on a river for a number of years at a fixed annual price. This data adjusted to 2002 price levels is shown and summarized in table 1 for the years 1995 to 2000. Also shown are income per rod permitted as well as the value of each salmon caught.

When calculating the value of salmon to the Icelandic economy the variable pricing of rods through the season and the income of outfitters and angling associations from renting of lodging and other accomodations has to be taken into account. The number of permitted rods on each river is fixed as decided by the Directorate of Freshwater Fisheries and the gross income per rod can thus also be calculated. The information on pricing of rods, rod utilization as well as board and lodging was obtained from various sources. The Reykjavík Angling Club as well as the Lax-á and Strengir angling clubs issue price lists for the upcoming season and also provide information on their homepages (svfr.is, lax-a.is, strengir.is). The Federation of River Owners also provides valuable information on angling prices on their homepage (angling.is). According to those sources the prices vary greatly through the season, being highest during the peak of the salmon run in July. Foreign anglers make up a large component of the clientel during that period in many rivers. They usually pay for a great deal of accessories linked to fishing such as guidance on the river and transport to and from airports, which is commonly included in the price of the licence. These calculations for the 2001 salmon season are shown in table 2. It shows data for the 95 Icelandic salmon rivers, whereof 18 (20 %) have a catch of more than 500 salmon and 77 (80 %) have less than 500 salmon caught. It is assumed that the 100 day fishing season is devided into 3 equal periods with the highest price for licences during the center period when approximately 50 % of all the salmon are angled. This distribution is based on Icelandic salmon catch statistics for a number of years. The data for the 3 periods are then summaries, providing the total income for each river group as well as for all the Icelandic salmon rivers. The value of salmon for each river group as well as for all the salmon rivers can then be calculated. For the purpose of calculating the values it has furthermore been assumed that 85 % of permitted rods are utilized each day. It should be pointed out that no distinction is made between salmon harvested and those that are hooked and released and they are collectively referred to as harvested. Catch and release has, however, been gradually increasing in Iceland and is recorded separately in the catch records (Guðbergsson 2002). 2 a) Income to River Associations Results Table 1. summarizes the income to river associations for 8 rivers with relatively high catches and 8 rivers with lower catches for the last 6 years. As shown in the summary column the 8 rivers with the high catches have a total of 75 rods operating each day, which harvest about 9700 salmon annually, which is close to 30 % of the total annual catch. The total value of those rivers to their owners is close to 2,5 million $ US, which corresponds to $ 34.000 per rod. The value of each salmon harvested to the river associations is thus $ 261. Similarly the 8 rivers with lower catches have 24 rods operating per day, which harvest roughly 2000 salmon annually. The total value of those 8 rivers to their owners is close to US $ 380.000, which corresponds to $ 16.000 per rod. The value of each salmon to the river associations in this class of river is thus $ 190. Since over 80 % of Icelandic salmon rivers would fall into the latter category it seems safe to assume that the net value of each angled salmon to the river associations is just over 200 $ US.

3 b) Value of salmon to the economy Table 2 summarizes the value of salmon angling to the Icelandic economy for the 2001 salmon season adjusted to 2002 prices. The 18 rivers with the highest catches utilize 153 rods per day, harvesting about 21.000 salmon, which is close to 70 % of the total annual angling catch. The total revenue for the sale of licences, lodging as well as guiding on the rivers is close to US $ 9,4 million, which corresponds to $ 61.178 per rod allowed on all the rivers through the season (153). Based on the above catch the value of each salmon to the economy is about $ 446 for this class of rivers. The 77 rivers with mediocre and low catches utilize about 196 rods per day, which harvest about 9.000 salmon annually. The total revenue for the sale of licenses and other commodities for these rivers is close to US $ 5,3 million, which corresponds to $ 26.990 per rod permitted (196). The value of each salmon to the economy, however, is close to $ 588 for this river class. It is interesting to note that the value of each salmon to the economy is higher for the rivers with lower catches whereas the opposite was true for the value of each salmon to the river owners. This indicates that the profit margin for outfitters and angling associations is higher in less expensive rivers. It should also be noted that increased catches in a year will lead to lower value of each salmon as these are inversely related. The bottom section of table 2 summarizes these data for all Icelandic salmon rivers (95). All these rivers utilize a total of 350 rods per day, which harvest an average annual catch of 30.000 salmon. The total revenue for the sale of licences and other commodities on the rivers is about US $ 14.6 million, which corresponds to $ 41.978 per permitted rod (349). The value of each salmon to the economy for all the rivers is about US $ 488. This value is irrespective of the size of the salmon, which seems to be of lesser importance to anglers than the number of salmon available for catching. Value of net caught salmon During the 2001 season about 3000 salmon were caught in set-nets in rivers, which is less than 10 % of the total catch (Guðbergsson 2002). All of these salmon are marketed within Iceland and since wild salmon are a rare seasonal commodity, they fetch a reasonably high price on the market compared to reared salmon. According to gill-netters on the Ölfusa river the 2002 price was close to 6,5 US $ per kilogram, which is close to $ 16 for an average size grilse. Similar average value for 2-SW salmon would be $ 32. Assuming that roughly half of the salmon caught would be grilse the adjusted value for net caught salmon would be $ 24. From this figure we need to subtract the cost of netting and marketing, which is likely to be at least $10 per salmon. The net value of netted salmon would thus be $ 14, which is 1/35 th of the value of such a salmon in an angling fishery. Conclusions From the above discussion it can be concluded that each salmon in the Icelandic sport fisheries is worth about US $ 500 to the Icelandic economy, when only river related factors are considered such as fishing licences, food and lodging as well as guiding on the rivers. To this can be added the revenues from the sale of bait, tackle and angling gear as well as airline fares and marginal costs associated with a luxury fishing trip. No information is available to estimate these costs but it is probably safe to assume that the most expensive facors have been considered. If we assume that these factors add 20 % to the above value of each salmon the estimated value rises to $ 600 per salmon. The value in Euros would be approximately equivalent.

4 This figure is somewhat lower than the value of $1000 per salmon quoted earlier but it should be noted that reduced catches in a season lead to higher value per salmon, since these are inversely related. Although this seems somewhat paradoxical one can probably assume that high quality fishing in the long run keeps up demand and thus price of licences. The calculations in the paper are clearly sensitive to changes in exchange rates. The dollar values used correspond to 92 Icelandic crowns per dollar, which was valid in June 2002. The current exchange rate is I. Kr. 82 per dollar, which increases the value of the angling components sold in an Icelandic currency. The above figures are thus a minimum estimate. With respect to net caught salmon we can draw the conclusion that angled salmon are at least 35 times more valuable Diverse Icelandic homepages regarding angling (angling.is; svfr.is; lax-a.is; strengir.is) Literature Guðbergsson Guðni 2002. Lax- og silungsveiðin 2001 (Angling statistics 2001), VMST-R/0207 Stangaveiðifélag Reykjavíkur 2002. Söluskrá árið 2002 (Sales catalog), 67 pp. Stangaveiðifélag Reykjavíkur 2002. Ársskýrsla (Annual report), 45 pp. Stangaveiðifélagið LAX-Á 2002. Söluskrá fyrir árið 2002 (Sales catalog), 39 pp. Veiðiþjónustan Strengir 2001. Söluskrá (Sales catalog 2001), 6pp. Verðmæti stangaveiðinnar. Fréttabréf Landssambands veiðifélaga 2002 (Federation of Icelandic River Associations, News letters)

Summaries (averages) 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Group 1 Number of allowed rods per day 74 74 75,8 74,2 75 74,7 74,6 8 representative rivers Mean total catch for the previous 5 years 9957 10048 9250 9545 9995 9547 9723,7 5 year mean catch: 700-1900 salmon per river Revenue $1.748.092 $1.840.785 $1.962.923 $2.065.431 $2.328.244 $2.634.678 Adjusted revenue* $2.255.038 $2.319.389 $2.434.024 $2.519.826 $2.747.328 $2.950.840 $2.537.741 Income per rod $30.473 $31.343 $32.111 $33.960 $36.631 $39.503 $34.004 Value per salmon $226 $231 $263 $264 $275 $309 $261 Group 2 Number of allowed rods per day 24 24 24,3 24,3 24 24 24,1 8 representative rivers Mean total catch for the previous 5 years 2266 2237 2046 1941 1941 1851 2047,0 5 year mean catch: 100-500 salmon per river Table 1. Value of salmon to Icelandic River Associations with revenue adjusted to 2002 prices. Partly based on information from the Federation of Icelandic River Associations. Revenue $293.348 $298.800 $295.529 $317.339 $329.335 $355.507 Adjusted revenue* $378.419 $376.489 $366.456 $387.154 $388.615 $398.168 $382.550 Income per rod* $15.767 $15.687 $15.080 $15.932 $16.192 $16.590 $15.875 Value per salmon* $167 $168 $179 $199 $200 $215 $188 * Price adjusted to June 2002 values 1$ June 2002: 91,7 kr.

6 Table 2. Estimation of value of angled salmon for the year 2001. All prices are adjusted to 2002 price index. Group 1 Group 2 1$ june 2002 = 91,7 kr. Total catch of salmon (s) = 30000 Beginning of period Angling periods Middle part of period Later part of period Summaries Formulas for calculations Number of days for eatch catching period (t): 33 33 33 99 Percent salmon caught for each period (p): 25% 50% 25% 100% Rivers ( n1 ) = 18 Percent of total angling catch (k1) 70% Catch more than Number of salmon for each angling period (a1) 5250 10500 5250 21000 a1=s*k1*p 500 salmon Mean number of allowed rods per river per day (r1) 10 Percent of used rods for each day (m1) 85% Total number of rods used each day (b1) 153 153 153 153 b1=n1*r1*m1 Total number of used rods (c1) 5049 5049 5049 15147 c1=b1*t Price per rod per day (d1) $273 $1.200 * $273 $582 d1 ( 20 % of all rivers) Board and lodging per rod per day (e1) $55 Lodging included** $55 e1 Gross income (f1) $1.651.799 $6.056.598 $1.651.799 $9.360.196 f1=(d1+e1)*c1 Gross income per rod (g1) $10.796 $39.586 $10.796 $61.178 g1=f1/b1 Value of each salmon (h1) $315 $577 $315 $446 h1=f1/a1 Rivers ( n2 ) = 77 Percent of total angling catch (k2) 30% Catch less than Number of salmon for each angling period (a2) 2250 4500 2250 9000 a2=s*k2*p 500 salmon Mean number of allowed rods per river per day (r2) 3 Percent of used rods for each day (m2) 85% Total number of rods used each day (b2) 196 196 196 196 b2=n2*r2*m2 Total number of used rods (c2) 6468 6468 6468 19404 c2=b2*t Price per rod per day (d2) $164 $273 $218 $218 d2 ( 80 % of all rivers) Board and lodging per rod per day (e2) $55 $55 $55 $55 e2 Gross income (f2) $1.410.687 $2.116.031 $1.763.359 $5.290.076 f2=(d2+e2)*c2 Gross income per rod (g2) $7.197 $10.796 $8.997 $26.990 g2=f2/b2 Value of each salmon (h2) $627 $470 $784 $588 h2=f2/a2 Group 1 and 2 combined Rivers ( n1+n2 ) = 95 Total salmon caught in 2001 (a3) 7500 15000 7500 30000 a3=a1+a2 All rivers Total number of rods used each day (b3) 349 349 349 349 b3=b1+b2 Total number of used rods (c3) 11517 11517 11517 34551 c3=c1+c2 Proporsional price per rod (d3) $184 $448 $228 $287 d3=(n1*d1+n2*d2)/(n1+n2) Board and lodging per rod per day $55 $55 Gross income (f3) $3.062.486 $8.172.628 $3.415.158 $14.650.273 f3=f1+f2 Gross income per rod (g3) $8.775 $23.417 $9.786 $41.978 g3=g1+g2 Value of each salmon (h3) $408 $545 $455 $488 h3=g3/a3 * Minimal spending ** Lodging, food, guide and transporttation