Structural Assessment. USS Yorktown CV-10

Similar documents
Cathodic Protection and Underwater Survey for an Floating Storage Offloading (FSO) System

We re good at what we do! Anywhere, TX SITE

Challenges in Ship Design to Maintain Thrusters inside Ship

NAUTICAL TERMINOLOGY

Zenith Maritime LLC Seattle, Washington USA

CWS Maritime Services

RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION OF MOBILE OFFSHORE UNITS

REPORT OF INITIAL SURVEY OF AN UNKNOWN BARGE OFF OF CEDAR POINT, SANDUSKY, OHIO. July 26-27, Submitted to Cleveland Underwater Explorers, Inc.

Number 159. Permanent underwater insert repair in Norway Fast underwater ship hull cleaning on largest container vessels in the world..

PASSENGER SHIPS Guidelines for preparation of Hull Structural Surveys

Hit 19 Damage to Searchlight No. 3

Survey Report. For...

Aidan Tuckett B.Sc.(Hons).

NEW BUILD - Wildcat 53 Windfarm Support Vessel Listing ID:

T.D. Vinette North Shore 32 Pelican

Testing Procedures of Watertight Compartments

PSSRA Work Package Overview The Mighty War Ship

MicroROV Technology Helps in USS Arizona Preservation By: Bob Christ, VideoRay LLC

The salient features of the 27m Ocean Shuttle Catamaran Hull Designs

Fishing Vessel Stability

Hysucat. powerful, functional...

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY USS S4LVoR (ARS-52) C/O FLBET POST OFFICE SAN FRANCISCO. CALIFORNIA

USS Charles F Adams DDG-2 Philadelphia Open House. May 17-18, 2010

a. On the centerline of the T-top b. On the aft starboard corner of the deck c. On the aft deck as close to centerline as possible

What hull material types will the system work on? Do I still need an antifoul paint?

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT DISTRICT 8 - LAC QUI PARLE COUNTY

ASSIGNMENT 1. Assignment 1 Page 1 of 7

SHIP FORM DEFINITION The Shape of a Ship

Huckins CORINTHIAN Kingfisher

LOD 39.8, LWL 29.1, Beam 11, Draft 4.7 (centerboard up), Displacement 21,000 lbs Designer: Wirth M. Munroe Built 1956 by Warren Bailey.

Ship Resistance and Propulsion Prof. Dr. P. Krishnankutty Ocean Department Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

RULES PUBLICATION NO. 52/P UNDERWATER INSPECTION OF MOBILE OFFSHORE DRILLING UNITS IN LIEU OF DRYDOCKING

Marine Kit 4 Marine Kit 4 Sail Smooth, Sail Safe

Murray F Reid. Marine Surveyor and Consultant CONDITION REPORT (HULL EXTERIOR) 10 February Catamaran SAMURI

"Flying Colours" - Antaris 950

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH NO. 9 OVER THE BLUE EARTH RIVER DISTRICT 7 - BLUE EARTH COUNTY

AUTORIDAD DEL CANAL DE PANAMÁ EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENCY FOR OPERATIONS

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT METRO DISTRICT - ANOKA COUNTY

(5) Results of Operational Inspections (6) Commendatory Correspondence. Copy to: NAVSURFGRU MIDPAC

DESIGN COMMENTS #35-95 Submarine support ocean passagemaker

MSC Guidelines for Vents, Fills and Sounds

Surface Guide to Damage Control National Response Directorate

Chapter 1 Boat systems

Specification of Dafman Patrol Boat 13.6

CONDITION & VALUATION SURVEY REPORT

HELLEMAN HOLLAND. LOA: 85' 0" (25.91m) Beam: 19' 0" (5.79m) Max Draft: 8' 0" (2.44m)

STRUCTURAL MEMBERS OF A SHIP. compartment stem frame beam bracket girder stern post hull angle bar stiffener

New Orleans Municipal Yacht Harbor

The Metal Shark 75 Endurance is a welded aluminum pilothouse catamaran specially designed for use as a law enforcement, port security, and fire

National Marine Manufacturers Association Product Compliance Specialist Examination Ladders, Handholds & Rails (2015 MY) ABYC H-41 (09)

New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission CFR 49 Part 192 Regulations. MINIMUM Pipeline Safety Regulations

Finnish Yacht Surveyor Association MARINE SURVEY REPORT

A Professional Commercial Diving & Marine contractor. Tel :

A Most Challenging Project: Repair of the Sophia D

photos by JURIJ KORENC production STUDIO 37

Vessel Modification and Hull Maintenance Considerations Options & Pay Back Period or Return On Investments

QUALITY ALUMINUM BOAT LIFTS, INC. INSTRUCTIONS. Dominator Lake Lift

Cornish Crabbers Shrimper 19 Curlew

Objectives Topics Resources & Notes GAIN ATTENTION Review Homework for chapter 5 Slide 1 OBJECTIVE

Inflatable Pontoons Listing ID:

PART 3 HULL INTEGRITY AND ARRANGEMENT

Chapter 2. Before You Get Underway. Copyright Coast Guard Auxiliary Association, Inc.

PART 1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

Mk- Ser C0/ Dec 97. From: Commanding Officer, USS SALVOR (ARS 52) To : Director of Naval History (N09BH)

The following Rule Changes were approved by the ABS Rules Committee on 1 June 2018 and

Hulls. Contact the National Museum of the U.S. Navy for Field Trip and School Visit opportunities!

Accommodating Larger Vessels: Ship Maneuverability and Channel Depth; A discussion of vessel motion in shallow water and future research needs.

Salvage of USS SQUALUS. Submarine Sunk

OVERALL SURVEY: A survey intended to report on the overall condition of the hull structure and determine the extent of additional close-up surveys.

Testing Procedures of Watertight Compartments

TP 11249E SHIP SAFETY STANDARD FOR IN-WATER SURVEYS

CAMPER & NICHOLSON XYRIS CLASS 30 FT SLOOP SOLD

Index All you need to know

T-801 Inspection Limits and Repair

AMENDMENTS NO. 2/2012 to

General Assembly Venice Lagoon Boat Length 8.2m Beam m Disp kg Power - 10/15hp (Short Shaft)

Nonsuch 36 Cuvee. Number: Sail Northwest

Response Boat & Barge

Designing an ICCP System for the Hull of an Arctic Ice-Breaking Vessel

PART 3 HULL INTEGRITY AND ARRANGEMENT

1-22. KETCHIKAN, ALASKA (Thomas and Bar Point Basins) (CWIS NOS & 87071) Condition of Improvement 30 September 2007

Parts of the Ship. Terms you should already know

FLAGLER BEACH PIER POST INCIDENT SAFETY INSPECTION HURRICANE IRMA SEPTEMBER 15-17, 2017

EKC International FZE. Safety Instructions For Handling & Inspection Manual For Refillable Seamless Steel Gas Cylinders

NOBLE REV 02 FPSO MOORING SYSTEM INTEGRITY STUDY

SPACIOUS: PLENTY OF ROOM TO MOVE AROUND

ProKat 2860 Cuddy Cabin My Kitty Kat

File No.: Date of Inspection: December 12, 2016

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT DISTRICT 8 - LAC QUI PARLE COUNTY

Southerly 105 Kestrel of Poole

Travel-Lift Operating Procedure. To that end, we would like to introduce the following procedure for HMPC lifting operations.

HMS Colossus Dive Trail

MANOEUVRING BOOKLET V1.06

Testing Procedures of Watertight Compartments

AUSTRALIAN ARROW AND ARAFURA CADET ASSOCIATION ARROW CATAMARAN RESTRICTIONS AND MEASUREMENT CERTIFICATE

34' (10.36m) CRUSADER

MSC Guidelines for Review of Stability for Sailing Catamaran Small Passenger Vessels (T)

Charlottetown Marine Terminal Pipeline Decommissioning Project Description

NEW BUILD - Lancer RU540 Rigid Inflatable boat

SECTION BUTTERFLY VALVES

Transcription:

Structural Assessment of USS Yorktown CV-10

Assessment Team

USS Yorktown History Constructed December 1941- January 1943 Essex Class CV-10 10 th USS Navy Aircraft Carrier Served in WWII Modified in 1955 Served in Vietnam Decommissioned in 1970 Moved to Patriots Point in 1975

USS Yorktown Length: 888-ft (originally 872-ft) Beam (at waterline): 101-ft (originally 93-ft) Draft: 30-ft

USS Yorktown Profile

Assessment Tasks Task 1 - Assessment of Exterior Hull Above the Mud Line Task 2 - Assessment of Exterior Hull Below the Mud Line Based on Literature Task 3 - Assessment of Exterior Hull Below the Mud Line Based on Inspection Task 4 - Visual Assessment of Accessible Compartments in the Bow Region Task 5 - Visual Assessment of all Accessible Compartments in the Remainder of the Vessel Task 6 - Estimation of Rates of Corrosion and Development of Ongoing Maintenance Plan Task 7 - Interpretation of the Structural Assessment and Repair Recommendations

Task 1 Assessment of Exterior Hull Above the Mud Line Galvanic Inspection Level I Dive Inspection of entire hull Level II Dive Inspection at 12 locations Level III Dive Inspection at 12 locations Visual Review from Jon Boat

Exterior Hull Exposure Zones

Task 1 Level II and III Dive Inspection Locations Frame 50 Stern Bow Frame 50

Task 1 Observations

Task 1 Observations

Task 1 Observations

Task 2 Assessment of Exterior Hull Below the Mud Line Based on Literature Literature Survey of below mud line corrosion Review of Task 1 results Review of Galvanic Inspection results Previous Assessment Experience with Similar Vessels Expect to see more significant corrosion in the following areas: o Areas with poor galvanic protection o Interface of mud/water o Interfaces of different soils o Interfaces of different metal types

Task 3- Assessment of Exterior Hull Below the Mud Line Based on Inspection Frame 50 Stern Bow Frame 50 Local, temporary removal of Mud to a Depth of 6 feet to perform: o Level II Dive Inspection at 7 locations o Level III Dive Inspection at 7 locations

Major Findings of Tasks 1 and 3 Task 1 - Tidal & Submerged Zones o Typical layer of marine growth approximately ½ in. thick o Pitting corrosion, typically 1/8 in. to 1 in. diameter o Up to 1/16 in. penetration of pitting corrosion on all areas exposed for inspection o Up to 6.06% loss of section was observed o Average of 2.48% loss of section was observed Task 3 Below the mudline o Pitting corrosion, typically 1/8 in. to 1 in. diameter o Up to 1/16 in. penetration of pitting corrosion on all areas exposed for inspection o Up to 5.60% loss of section was observed o Average of 3.57% loss of section was observed

Tasks 4/5- Visual Assessment of Accessible Compartments from 4 th Deck Down Through Hold Review of accessible compartments at 4 th Deck, 1 st Platform, 2 nd Platform and Hold levels Ultrasonic thickness measurements of exterior hull plate, where accessible Task 4 Forward of Frame 50 Task 5 Aft of Frame 50

Task 4/5 Assessment Areas

Task 4/5 Observations A-504A SD Stores, Frames 19-26 A-504A SD Stores, Frames 19-26 A-605A SD Stores, Frames 18-25 A-605½M Incendiary Bomb Magazine, Frames 18-25

Task 4/5 Observations Chain Locker, Frames 7-12½ A 712T WT Trunk, Frames 50-51

Task 4/5 Observations A 612M Small Arms, Frames 51-55 A 526G Gasoline Pump Room, Frames 58-63 A 620C Damage Control Station, Frames 67-72 A 625C Plotting Room, Frames 74-79

Task 4/5 Observations Forward AMR, Frames 79-86 Forward AMR, Frames 79-86 No. 1 Fire Room, Frames 86-93 C 518E Steering Gear Ram Room, Frames 191½-198

Task 4/5 Observations C 606M 5 Powder Magazine, Frames 155-163 C 610 1AE, Diesel Fire Pump Room, Frames 166-176 C 702E Shaft Alley (Port), Frames 150-161 C 701E Shaft Alley (Stbd), Frames 150-161

Task 4/5 Observations A 403A Electrical Storeroom, Frames 15-19 A 504A SD Stores, Frames 19-26 A 504A SD Stores, Frames 19-26 A-605½M Incendiary Bomb Magazine, Frames 18-25

Task 4/5 Observations A 523M Universal Bomb Storage, Frames 50-58 A 523M Universal Bomb Storage, Frames 50-58 A 523M Universal Bomb Storage, Frames 50-58 A 525½T Bomb Elevator, Frames 55-58

Task 4/5 Observations A 613ET WT Trunk, Frames 49-52 A 523M Universal Bomb Storage, Frames 50-58 A 523M Universal Bomb Storage, Frames 50-58 A 523M Universal Bomb Storage, Frames 50-58

Task 4/5 Observations A 541ET Bomb Elevator, Frames 70-74 B-1-1 Fwd AMR, Frames 79-86 C 610 1AE Diesel Fire Pump Room, Frames 166-176 C 701E Shaft Alley (Stbd), Frames 150-161

Task 4/5 Observations C 516A Vestibule, Frames 184-186 C 605E JP5 Pump Room, Frames 154-163 C 606M 5 Powder Magazine, Frames 155-163 C 607A Air Flask, Frames 163-166

Major Findings of Tasks 4/5 Flooding and/or severe deterioration on 4 th Deck level forward of Frame 19 Flooding and/or severe deterioration on 1 st Platform level forward of Frame 26 and at isolated spaces in forward and aft areas of Task 5 Flooding and/or severe deterioration on 2 nd Platform level forward of Frame 26 and between Frames 38 and 42 and at isolated spaces in forward and aft areas of Task 5 Flooding and/or severe deterioration on Hold level forward of Frame 26 and between Frames 44 and 50 and at isolated spaces in forward engineering flats and isolated compartments in aft areas

4 th Deck Frame 50 Frame 50 1 st Platform Frame 50 Frame 50

2 nd Platform Frame 50 Frame 50 Hold Frame 50 Frame 50

Task 6 Estimation of Rates of Corrosion and Development of Ongoing Maintenance Plan Review all collected data from previous tasks Estimate corrosion rate of hull plate Develop corrosion protection plan Develop ongoing maintenance plan

Task 6 Findings/Recommendations Highest rates of hull plate corrosion found in Splash Zone; approximately.002 to.007 in. loss of section per year Localized areas with 70%-80% loss of section Isolated areas with up to 100% loss of section Rates of hull plate corrosion in tidal & submerged zones found to be approximately.00062 to.0015 in. loss of section per year Regular inspection to ensure watertight integrity of vessel Maintenance of paint and coatings in areas exposed to weather Maintenance of existing Cathodic Protection System to minimize corrosion in submerged areas

Task 7 Interpretation of the Structural Assessment & Repair Recommendations Labor and materials costs to perform structural repairs: Estimated repair costs for deteriorated areas forward of Frame 50: $28,679,541 Estimated repair costs for deteriorated areas aft of Frame 50: $9,809,330 Total estimated repair costs: $38,488,871

THANK YOU!