DMU 487 Northern Multi-County Deer Management Unit

Similar documents
DMU 452 Northern Multi-County Deer Management Unit

5/DMU 069 Otsego County Deer Management Unit

DMU 005 Antrim County Deer Management Unit

DMU 024 Emmet County Deer Management Unit

DMU 065 Ogemaw County Deer Management Unit

DMU 043 Lake County Deer Management Unit

DMU 361 Fremont Deer Management Unit Newaygo, Oceana, N. Muskegon Counties

DMU 053 Mason County Deer Management Unit

DMU 056 Midland County Deer Management Unit

DMU 057 Missaukee County Deer Management Unit

DMU 072 Roscommon County Deer Management Unit

DMU 419 Clinton, Eaton, Ingham, Ionia, and Shiawassee Counties

Deer Management Unit 122

Deer Management Unit 152

Deer Management Unit 249

021 Deer Management Unit

Deer Management Unit 255

DMU 008 Barry County Deer Management Unit

DMU 047 Livingston County Deer Management Unit

DMU 046 Lenawee County Deer Management Unit

Deer Management Unit 252

Deer Management Unit 127

DMU 332 Huron, Sanilac and Tuscola Counties Deer Management Unit

DMU 040 Kalkaska County Deer Management Unit

DMU 038 Jackson County

DMU 045 Leelanau County Deer Management Unit

DMU 082 Wayne County Deer Management Unit

DMU 006 Arenac County Deer Management Unit

Deer Management Unit 349

DMU 073 Saginaw County Deer Management Unit

Minnesota Deer Population Goals. East Central Uplands Goal Block

Full summaries of all proposed rule changes, including DMU boundary descriptions, are included in the additional background material.

ALTERNATIVE DEER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR GAME MANAGEMENT UNITS. 12A, 12B, 13A, 13B, 16A, 45A, 45B, 45C, and White-tailed Deer Units

2012 MICHIGAN DEER HUNTING: STATUS AND PROSPECTS

Minnesota Deer Population Goals

Minnesota Deer Population Goals

Minnesota Deer Population Goals. Sand Plain Big Woods Goal Block

Chronic Wasting Disease in Southeast Minnesota. Drs. Michelle Carstensen and Lou Cornicelli Preston Public Meeting December 18, 2018

ARE WHITE-TAILED DEER VERMIN?

Northwest Parkland-Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G7 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

Central Hills Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G9 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

2017 DEER HUNTING FORECAST

Implementing a Successful Deer Management Program. Kip Adams Certified Wildlife Biologist Dir. of Ed. & Outreach Quality Deer Management Association

MANAGED LANDS DEER PERMITS WHITE-TAILED DEER PROGRAM INFORMATION General Information

2015 Deer Population Goal Setting

Farm Wildlife Management and Food Plots

EXHIBIT C. Chronic Wasting Disease

BIG GAME SEASON STRUCTURE

MANAGED LANDS DEER PROGRAM INFORMATION. General Requirements

WORKING WITH COMMUNITIES AND INTEREST GROUPS

City of Galena 2017 Deer Hunting Survey

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion

Big Game Season Structure, Background and Context

Deer Hunting Frequently Asked Questions 2017 Deer Hunting Rules September 22, 2017

Introduction to Pennsylvania s Deer Management Program. Christopher S. Rosenberry Deer and Elk Section Bureau of Wildlife Management

Alberta Conservation Association 2016/17 Project Summary Report. Primary ACA staff on project: Stefanie Fenson, Jeff Forsyth and Jon Van Dijk

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

2008 MICHIGAN DEER HUNTING PROSPECTS

New Changes to the Managed Lands Deer Program (MLDP)

Kansas Deer Report Seasons

Cariboo-Chilcotin (Region 5) Mule Deer: Frequently Asked Questions

White-tailed Deer: A Review of the 2010 Provincially Coordinated Hunting Regulation

Recommendations for Elimination of Bovine Tuberculosis in Free-Ranging White-Tailed Deer in Michigan

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

NORTH TABLELANDS DEER HERD MANAGEMENT PLAN

Monitoring Population Trends of White-tailed Deer in Minnesota Marrett Grund, Farmland Wildlife Populations and Research Group

Street Edmonton, AB T6K 1T8. Alberta Fish and Game Association (AFGA) Position On Game Farming In Alberta February 2004

Dynamics of Bovine Tuberculosis in Wild White- Tailed Deer in Michigan

Concerns About Baiting and Feeding Game Wildlife

AN ASSESSMENT OF NEW JERSEY DEER HUNTER OPINION ON EXPANDING ANTLER POINT RESTRICTION (APR) REGULATIONS IN DEER MANAGEMENT ZONES 28, 30, 31, 34 AND 47

THIEF LAKE WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREA NEWSLETTER

Management History of the Edwards Plateau

Deer Management in Maryland. Brian Eyler Deer Project Leader Maryland DNR

FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS BY, WISCONSIN WHITE-TAILED DEER TRUSTEE AND REVIEW COMMITTEE JUNE, 2012

QDMA Land Certification Program - Standards & Performance Measures

Herd Reduction. Background.

Saint John's Abbey Arboretum Controlled Deer Hunt 2013

NORTH DAKOTA STATE REPORT May 25, 2011

DEER MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM LANDOWNER/LESSEE APPLICATION

Peace Region Wildlife Regulations Proposed Changes for Comment ( )

2017 LATE WINTER CLASSIFICATION OF NORTHERN YELLOWSTONE ELK

MOLESWORTH BOVINE TB CONTROL OPERATION (YEAR 1)

ARIKAREE DEER HERD MANAGEMENT PLAN

Winter 2016 Hunting District 313 Elk survey (Gardiner to 6-Mile Creek) Date: Flight Duration: Weather/Survey Conditions: Survey Methods

FIVE YEAR BIG GAME SEASON STRUCTURE DRAFT DATES FOR

DEER HUNT RESULTS ON ALABAMA WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREAS ANNUAL REPORT, CHRISTOPHER W. COOK STUDY LEADER MAY, 2006

Recommendations for Pennsylvania's Deer Management Program and The 2010 Deer Hunting Season

make people aware of the department s actions for improving the deer population monitoring system,

Deer Management in Maryland -Overview. Brian Eyler Deer Project Leader

IN PROGRESS BIG GAME HARVEST REPORTS FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH Energy and Resource Development

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

ALABAMA HUNTING SURVEY

2009 WMU 527 Moose, Mule Deer, and White tailed Deer

Michigan Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Project: 2005 Activities Report and Conference Proceedings

RANCHING Wildlife. Texas White-Tailed Deer 2017 Hunting Forecast

Wisconsin Deer Hunting Pocket Guide

PROPOSED RULEMAKING GAME COMMISSION

PARADISE CANYON RANCH

Summary of. Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Wildlife

CHECKS AND BALANCES. OVERVIEW Students become managers of a herd of animals in a paper-pencil, discussionbased

Transcription:

DMU 487 Northern Multi-County Deer Management Unit Area Description Deer Management Unit (DMU) 487 is a multi-county DMU created to address bovine tuberculosis (btb) in the Northern Lower Peninsula Region (NLP). This DMU incorporates Alcona, Alpena, Iosco, Montmorency, Oscoda, and Presque Isle Counties (Figure 4). These are the counties that surround DMU 452 which is the core btb area. DMU 487 is approximately 3,035 square miles in size, about 37% of which is public land. The remainder of land is in private ownership. Topography varies from rolling hills to areas that are relatively flat. Soils range from sandy types that are well drained to poorly drained muck. The landscape consists primarily of large private hunt clubs managed for deer hunting with interspersed agricultural lands and blocks of public land, primarily in the southern and western part of the unit. The large hunt clubs are dominated by forest land and provide excellent habitat for deer. Some forested habitat has been negatively impacted by high deer numbers and historic use for cattle pasture. The agricultural lands are used for pasture and row crops. Management Guidance One goal guides deer management in this DMU: btb eradication. Tuberculosis surveillance in deer continues to be an important activity in this unit, with most animals tested coming voluntarily from hunter harvested deer. DMU 487 is the core btb area where over 97% of the btb positive deer in Michigan have been found (Figure 1). In recent years, with a ten-year trend of 1.7% and a three-year trend of 1.8% apparent prevalence, there has been little change within the btb core area (Figure 2). Maintaining a management program that keeps deer numbers low minimizes btb transmission and aligns with the goal of eradication. Increased antlerless harvest reduces the risk of transmission by lowering deer populations and densities. Other tools aimed at increasing deer harvest include an early and late antlerless deer season as well as liberal Disease Control Permits, Deer Damage Permits and Deer Management Assistance Permits available to landowners in the DMU. In addition, enforcement of the current bans on baiting and feeding should continue, as high deer concentrations caused by these activities increase btb transmission.

Figure 1 Bovine Tuberculosis survey results in Michigan. Figure 2: Bovine Tuberculosis prevalence in in deer within DMU 452.

Population Assessment Factors Deer Harvest Analysis From 2008-2014, antlerless harvest trended alongside buck harvest. In 2015, antlerless harvest dropped below antlered harvest. This decrease in antlerless harvest should be monitored and addressed if it continues. Antlerless deer have been legal to take on any kill tag in the DMU since 2010, but it is not clear whether this effected the ratio of bucks to does harvested. Over 80% of the unit is private land and there is reluctance from some hunters to take more antlerless deer on their own property. Regardless, liberal antlerless license availability increases opportunities for hunters and fits our management goals. As discussed above, increased antlerless harvest reduces deer populations and densities, thereby reducing the potential for btb transmission. Figure 3: Recreational antlerless and antlered deer harvest in DMU 487. Disease Control Permits Participation in the Disease Contol Permit program has varied. Regardless of availability, the number of deer taken on DCPs has remained at a low level, never exceeding 5% of harvest with an average of 2% between 2001-2015. When compared to the number of antlerless deer killed by hunting, it has little to no lasting impact on the size of the overall herd. The success in this program is that individual cattle farmers are provided with a tool to address deer coming in with cattle or cattle feed sources, reducing their risk of btb transmission. It also furthers our deer management objective of increased harvest in DMU 487. This program should continue to be available to farmers that desire to protect their cattle in this manner.

Deer Management Recommendations In the ongoing effort to control btb in deer, and given that DMU 487 is a multi-county DMU created to address btb in the NLP, it is recommended that public and private land antlerless availability remain liberal in this DMU. Increasing the harvest of deer in this unit is essentialfor btb management. Offering effectively unlimited antlerless licenses, maintaining the current feeding and baiting bans, offering DCPs to those willing to use them, and maintaining late and early antlerless seasons on private land are all needed to increase the harvest of deer in this unit

Figure 4: Habitat map of Deer Management Unit 487.