NIH StrokeNet Network Standard Operating Procedure

Similar documents
University of Iowa External/Central IRB Reliance Process Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)

University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board. Reliance Agreement Guidance: Penn as Central IRB FAQ

Central IRBs: Where Does the UR Fit into the Picture?? Kelley O Donoghue Tiffany Gommel Emily Flagg April 15 th 2015

Commercial/ Central IRB An independent organization that provides IRB review services

HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS RESEARCH NETWORK

The Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures. Cooperative Agreements

RESEARCH PROTECTIONS OFFICE

RESEARCH SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

AUTHORITY AND PURPOSE

Collaborative Research

Initial Review. Approved By: Michele Kennett, JD, MSN, LLM Associate Vice Chancellor for Research. Table of Contents

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR S ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RESPONSIBILITIES

SOP 801: Investigator Qualifications and Responsibilities

University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board. Reliance Agreement Guidance: How to Apply for External IRB Review

Oklahoma State University Institutional Review Board Standard Operating Procedures

Study Management SM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Interactions with the Institutional Review Board (IRB)

Category Description This policy and procedure applies to the Sparrow research community.

Investigator Manual. If you have questions about whether an activity requires IRB review, contact the IRB Office.

Chapter 4 Institutional Review Board (IRB) Roles and Authorities

Florida State University IRB Standard Operational Procedures

November 30, Efficient Startup of Multi-site Research Studies: Central IRBs and National IRB Reliance Platforms

University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board. Reliance Agreement Guidance: Post-Approval Submissions

A Guide to SMART IRB s Resources for IRB and HRPP Personnel

IRB MEETING ADMINISTRATION

IRB-REQUIRED INVESTIGATOR ACTIONS

SMART IRB Agreement Implementation Checklist and Documentation Tool

IRB APPLICATION CHECKLIST

IRB Authorization Agreement Implementation Checklist and Documentation Tool

Centralized IRB Models

SOP #2-2 Version #1 Date First Effective: December 14, Page 1 of 6

Screening and Enrollment Log. List of all subjects screened and all subjects screened and enrolled in the study.

Your Roadmap to Single IRB Review Serving as a Reviewing IRB

University of Iowa External/Central IRB Single IRB (sirb) Reliance Process Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)

CUNY HRPP Procedures: Multisite Non-Exempt Human Subjects Research

IRB Reliance Models: Workshop for OSU Researchers Collaborating with External Partners

Standard Operating Policy and Procedures (SOPP) 3:

IRB Chair Responsibilities

Effective Date: January 16, 2012 Policy Number: MHC_RP0107. Revised Date: November 2, 2015 Oversight Level: Corporate

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD CONTINUING REVIEW OF RESEARCH

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD CONTINUING REVIEW AND REAPPROVAL OF RESEARCH

IRBMED: Ceding IRB Review to an External IRB

Single IRB Review. Jeannie Barone Director, HRPO. Institutional Review Board

CONTINUING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR RENEWAL

Institutional Review Board Submission Requirement Presentation

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

I. Summary. II. Responsibilities

Baptist Health Institutional Review Board. Study Closure Report (Expedited Review) IRB #: Study Title:

Signature Date Date First Effective: Signature Date Revision Date: 07/18/2011

SOP Title Review of Research: Devices for Humanitarian Uses

IV. Basic Procedures for Human Research Protections

Policies & Standard Operating Procedures

1. Review and approval of the consent document is a responsibility that FDA assigns to the IRB with jurisdiction

CONTINUING REVIEW OF APPROVED IRB PROTOCOLS

I. Summary. II. Responsibilities

Reporting an Unanticipated Problem Involving Risks to Subjects or Others (UPIRTSO) to the IRB

SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES 02 06/30/10 08/01/07 1 OF 6

To assure knowledge and compliance by documenting the continuing review procedure of approved projects for the IRB.

Ceded IRB Review. The project involves prisoners or other vulnerable populations that require special considerations.

To assure knowledge and compliance by documenting the annual administrative review and continuing IRB review of non-exempt projects for the IRB.

The IRB is Your Friend. David W. Kaufman, Sc.D. Chair, Panel Orange

THE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA -- INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD -- STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

SOP 903: HRPP AND NON-COMPLIANCE

Cooroy Golf Club Inc. (ABN ) of 28 Myall Street, Cooroy Q4563

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD PROCEDURES FOR FULL BOARD REVIEW

SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

HOW TO CONDUCT AN IRB RELIANCE AGREEMENT. What Reliance Agreements Are, How They Are Reviewed, and What It Means for Submitting Research

CONTINUING REVIEW 3/7/2016

Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations

IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY Institutional Review Board. Policy on IRB Review of Protocol Deviations and Noncompliance for Non-exempt Research

Human Subjects in Research Review and Monitoring Form. Not applicable

Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committees for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures Continuing Review of Approved Research

Issue in IRB Approvals:

INTRA-INSTITUTIONAL COMMUNICATION

Institutional Review Board Standard Operating Procedure. Suspension and Termination of IRB Approval

CUNY HRPP Policy: Suspension or Termination of Human Subject Research

Tuesday, May 15, Please be sure to sign in and take copies of each handout.

SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH

Date Effective 4/21/2008 Identification

University of Cincinnati. Radiation Safety Committee Operations Guidelines Statement of Policy (RSC Guidelines) RSC Guidelines (revision 5)

Lapse in IRB Approval

Wayne State University Institutional Review Board

IRB MEMBERSHIP COMPOSITION, ROLES AND RESPONSIBILIES

OHRP Guidance on Written IRB Procedures

Administrative Hold, Suspension, or Termination of IRB Approval

SOP 407: PROTOCOL DEVIATIONS AND UNANTICIPATED PROBLEMS

2.0 Institutional Review Board

Submitting Continuing Reviews and/or Amendments to the IRB

New Chapter Guide. Contents. 2 Organizing a Chapter. 3 General Guidelines. 4 ICF Chapter Requirements. 5 ICF Charter Chapter Requirements

Human Research Protections Program Medical College of Wisconsin and Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital

Your Roadmap to Single IRB Review Getting Started with SMART IRB & the Online Reliance System

COMPLIANCE MONITORING

Review of Research by the Convened IRB

CONTINUING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR RENEWAL

Pepperdine University eprotocol - IRB Student Investigator User Guide

EMERGENCY USE 03/02/2016

USC Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

SOP Institutional Review Board (IRB) Appointments and Membership

Yale University Human Research Protection Program

IRB MEETING ADMINISTRATION

Effective Date Revisions Date Review by the Convened Institutional Review Board

Transcription:

1. POLICY This policy will define the recommended process for the addition of new satellite sites. The Principal Investigator (PI) of the Regional Coordinating Center (RCC) ultimately has decision making authority about initial inclusion of a satellite site (RCC-SS) and whether a satellite site should be removed from the RCC because of failure to meet expectations of recruitment and trial conduct. An RCC should initially focus on integration of its satellite sites included in the initial submission before adding new sites. An RCC can accept a new satellite site that was not part of an original submission. An RCC is not required to accept a satellite site that was not part of original submission. It is not required that a new site be in close geographic proximity to the RCC, however network leadership encourages RCC s to choose satellites geographically close to maintain the Regional Network concept and to facilitate the supervision of that site during clinical trial enrollments. 2. DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS RCC RCC-SS RCC-CPS NCC NIH MTA RA Regional Coordinating Centers-Institutions designed and directly funded by NINDS/NIH to provide leadership for the Stroke Network on a regional level Satellite sites are institutions named by an RCC as a part of its regional network that are not legally affiliated with the RCC A clinical performance site is an institution that is not legally affiliated with the awarded RCC but which has agreed to serve as a network trial recruitment site for an awarded RCC network. National Coordinating Center, University of Cincinnati National Institutes of Health NIH StrokeNet Master Trial Agreement is a bilateral agreement between the NCC and the RCC or RCC-SS similar to a memorandum of understanding. This agreement expresses a convergence of will between the parties, indicating an intended common line of action. The reliance agreement is a formal, written document that provides a mechanism for an institution engaged in research to delegate institutional review board (IRB) review to the central IRB ADM 10 Final Page 1

COI GCP Conflict of Interest also known as financial Conflict of Interest. A significant financial interest that could directly and significantly affect the design, conduct, or reporting of PHS-funded research (42 CRF 50) Good Clinical Practice per International Conference on Harmonization 3. SCOPE This policy applies to all Regional Coordinating Centers with infrastructure awards from the NIH. 4. PROCEDURES A. Review Criteria for adding sites- a. It is the policy of the NIH StrokeNet that an RCC-SS and RCC-CPS can only be aligned with one network RCC. b. It is recommended that RCCs accept potential sites that have a demonstrated ability to recruit into stroke trials c. New potential satellites should have clearly defined leadership and delegation of authority within the satellite site that is responsible for meeting the requirements of a satellite site in the NIH StrokeNet with regards to MTA, RA, and clinical research requirements for participating investigators, including Conflict of Interest (COI) reporting. B. Process for adding to Network a. RCC establishes relationship with potential satellite site. The process may be initiated by the RCC or vice versa. b. The RCC notifies the NCC of their interest in adding a new satellite to their RCC. c. The NCC verifies that the satellite is not currently linked with another RCC. d. NCC establishes MTA and RA as appropriate. C. Responsibilities of RCC Leadership: a. Ultimate responsibility for the quality of trial data at all RCC sites, as well as compliance of RCC-SS and RCC-CPS with Good Clinical Practice NO NCC administrative staff establishes MTA and RA agreements (as appropriate) RCC establishes relationship with potential satellite site. The RCC notifies the NCC of their interest in adding a new satellite to their RCC. The NCC checks if the satellite is linked with another RCC. YES Satllitte site remains affiliated with original RCC. ADM 10 Final Page 2

and Conflict of Interest Reporting even if this task is delegated to the RCC-SS. b. Communicating of all RCC activities to RCC-SS including regional meetings. c. Acting as a resource for any local questions regarding ongoing NIH StrokeNet trials within the RCC. d. Visiting the RCC-SS to understand the infrastructure and processes that are in place. e. Monitoring the RCC-SSs documentation of COIs, GCP provided by the responsible RCC-SS leadership. D. Responsibilities of new RCC-SS: a. Current registration in SAM.gov b. Recruit into the NIH StrokeNet Trials under the same Protocol Trial Agreements as the participating RCC site. c. Provide excellent quality data, documentation of Conflict of Interests and Good Clinical Practice training for participating investigators. d. Travel to RCC meetings or NIH StrokeNet meetings must be paid for by the RCC except as covered for travel related to trials as a recruitment site. Any other coverage of travel expenses would be at the discretion of the RCC PI. e. Completing documentation of trial enrollment and accomplished tasks prior to receiving payment by the NCC. E. Responsibilities of new RCC-CPS: a. Recruit into the NIH StrokeNet Trials under the RCC Protocol Trial Agreements. b. Provide excellent quality data, documentation of Conflict of Interests and Good Clinical Practice training for participating investigators. c. Travel to RCC meetings or NIH StrokeNet meetings must be paid by the RCC except as covered for travel related to trials as a recruitment site. Any other coverage of travel expenses would be at discretion of the RCC PI. d. Completing documentation of trial enrollment and accomplished tasks prior to receiving payment by the RCC. F. Responsibilities of the NCC: a. Execution of MTA and RA agreements with the Satellite Site. b. Communicating NIH StrokeNet activities including ongoing trials with all RCC-SS. c. Providing payment to each Satellite Site for trial activities as defined in MTA and Protocol Trial Agreements trial budgets including overhead. Such payments may be withheld if there are major issues with data completion and quality until these issues are addressed by the RCC and the RCC-SS. ADM 10 Final Page 3

d. Compensating for travel for investigators as needed for a given clinical trial run through the NIH StrokeNet. e. Assessing the RCC-SS performance as part of the larger RCC performance measurement. f. Crediting the RCC for all recruitment at the RCC-SS included in the RCC. 5. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS 42 CFR 50.604 Responsibilities of Institutions regarding Investigator financial conflicts of interest 45 CFR Part 94 Responsible Prospective Contractors 45 CFR 56 Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects ( The Common Rule ) RCC Notice of Award, Cooperative Clinical Research Agreement, Section IV- NS Special Terms and Conditions and Terms of Award sections 6. REFERENCES TO OTHER APPLICABLE SOPs ADM #6 Network Process for Documenting Essential Financial and Federal Compliance ADM #15 Network Communication 7. ATTACHMENTS AND REFERENCES Attachment A- MTA Template available on www.nihstrokenet.org Attachment B- RA template on available on www.nihstrokenet.org 8. DOCUMENT HISTORY Version Description of Modification Completion Issue Effective 1.0 Final 3-Jun-2014 3-Jun-2014 3-Jun-2014 ADM 10 Final Page 4