Freeway Improvement Project

Similar documents
The Bay Bridge Corridor Congestion Study

MCTC 2018 RTP SCS and Madera County RIFP Multi-Modal Project Eval Criteria GV13.xlsx

Washington DC Section of ITE Project Briefing

Highway 217 Corridor Study. Phase I Overview Report

Santa Clara I-280 CORRIDOR STUDY

Managed Lanes. Steve Schilke, P.E. Major Projects Unit Head District 1. Illinois Traffic Engineering and Safety Conference October 2016

DULLES AREA TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION (DATA) February 18, Susan Shaw, P.E., VDOT, Megaprojects Director

405 Express Lanes General Information & Frequently Asked Questions

Highway 17 Transportation Improvement Study

6/14/2013. Welcome. to the US 75 Corridor Study. Public Meeting. US 75 Corridor Study Area

Maryland State Highway Mobility Report. Morteza Tadayon

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

I-395 Express Lanes Northern Extension Project Crystal City Civic Association September 21, 2016

Priced Managed Lanes in America. October 2013

101 Corridor Managed Lanes

The I-680 Southbound Express Lane

ROADSOADS CONGESTION HAMPTON SYSTEMYSTEM MANAGEMENT. Part II Roadway Congestion Analysis Mitigation Strategies and Evaluation

CONGESTED LOS ANGELES

395 Express Lanes Extension

7.0 FREEWAYS CONGESTION HOT SPOT PROBLEM & IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ANALYSIS & DEFINITION

3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Planning Committee STAFF REPORT March 7, 2018 Page 2 of 4 The following MTSOs are being used across the five subregions: Intersection Level of Service

INTRODUCTION. The focus of this study is to reduce congestion and improve mobility for all modes of transportation. Figure ES-1 Study Corridor Map

3 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL TIMING AND SYNCHRONIZATION

What are Managed Lanes?

Typical Rush Hour Commute. PennyforTransportation.com

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... vii 1 STUDY OVERVIEW Study Scope Study Area Study Objectives

Performance Criteria for 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan

Presented by: Aziz Elattar Deputy District Director Planning, Public Transportation and Local Assistance October 4, 2013

I-395 Express Lanes Northern Extension Project Public Hearings

I-105 Corridor Sustainability Study (CSS)

Capital Beltway HOT Lanes - Frequently Asked Questions

Transform 66 Project February 4, 2016 Partnering Conference Michigan Department of Transportation American Council of Engineering Companies

Preliminary Review of the T-REX Southeast Corridor Highway and Light Rail Transit Project

Managed Lanes: A National Perspective Managed Lane Strategies

Memorandum. Fund Allocation Fund Programming Policy/Legislation Plan/Study Capital Project Oversight/Delivery Budget/Finance Contract/Agreement Other:

Regional Transportation Needs Within Southeastern Wisconsin

Bluffdale South (SR140) Bicycle/Shoulder Lanes Project Type Bicycle

TRANSPORTATION TRAINING TOPICS. April 6, 2010

Sketch Level Assessment. of Traffic Issues. for the Fluor Daniel I-495 HOT Lane Proposal. Ronald F. Kirby

Purpose and Need Report. Appendix B. Purpose and Need Report

STATION #3 INITIAL ALTERNATIVES

FM #: ETDM #: 11241

MnPASS System Today and the Future

1. Operate along freeways, either in regular traffic lanes, in high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes, or along the shoulders.

I-395 Express Lanes Northern Extension Project Fairlington Citizens Association September 12, 2016

Corporate. Report COUNCIL DATE: June 26, 2006 NO: C012 COUNCIL-IN-COMMITTEE. TO: Mayor & Council DATE: June 22, 2006

Transportation and Air Quality Committee GEL Project Briefing and Update

Transform I-66. Chief Engineer Garrett W. Moore, P.E. July 12, 2018

CHAPTER 2G. PREFERENTIAL AND MANAGED LANE SIGNS

Roadways. Roadways III.

MOVEABLE BARRIER. Congestion Management Solutions

The I-85 Express Lanes Project NASCIO Recognition Award Nomination

Northern Virginia Express Lanes Design Challenges and Solutions. IBTTA Maintenance and Roadway Operations Workshop June 25, 2018

DEVELOPING A POLICY TO PLAN AND OPERATE MANAGED LANES IN NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS: LBJ IN DALLAS COUNTY AND AIRPORT FREEWAY IN TARRANT COUNTY

Corridor Advisory Group and Task Force Meeting #10. July 27, 2011

State Road & Tollway Authority Georgia 400 Demolition Project Frequently Asked Questions

Mobility and Congestion

Part-time Shoulder Use Guide

Toll Express Lanes for the Research Triangle region Including discussion of possible applications on I-40

I-395 Express Lanes Northern Extension Project Arlington County Board October 18, 2016

Alleviate Traffic Congestion and Improve Operational Reliability of the Route 17 Corridor

A Federal Perspective on Congestion Pricing. Wayne Berman Federal Highway Administration July 8, 2010

Congestion Management Report

495 EXPRESS LANES NORTHERN EXTENSION STUDY COMMENT SUMMARY REPORT JUNE 11, 2018 PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING

Queensboro Bridge Bus Priority Study: Summary of Recommendations. Presentation to Manhattan Community Board 8 May 4, 2011

VISION Long Range Plan Update Board Workshop. February 10, 2016

Fast Affordable Sustainable Transportation

Charlotte Region Fast Lanes Study Phase III

Idea-66: Westbound I-66 Inside the Beltway

Today s Agenda. Welcome & Introductions. I-526 Lowcountry Corridor Update. Table Discussions. Next Steps / Conclusion

Part-time Shoulder Use Guide

3 ROADWAYS 3.1 CMS ROADWAY NETWORK 3.2 TRAVEL-TIME-BASED PERFORMANCE MEASURES Roadway Travel Time Measures

DRAFT. Memo. Range of the Alternatives Considered in the EIS

Secondary Road Program

Defining Purpose and Need

Dulles Area Transportation Association. October 11, Susan Shaw, P.E., Megaprojects Director Virginia Department of Transportation

NORTH HOUSTON HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DRAFT NEED AND PURPOSE

Durham Region Long Term Transit Strategy

I-105 ExpressLanes Project

North Coast Corridor:

Economics of Highway Spending and Traffic Congestion. Todd Litman Victoria Transport Policy Institute Presented Strong Towns Webinar 3 February 2016

Proposed Project I 35 from Denton to Cooke County Line

Strategies to Re capture Lost Arterial Traffic Carrying Capacities

ISSUE 1. Geography challenge. Geography funnels traffic from several key corridors onto I-5.

International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology. (A High Impact Factor, Monthly, Peer Reviewed Journal)

July 10, :00-11:30 a.m.

Route 29 Solutions Projects

I-35W Solutions Alliance Project Update July 13, 2017

Overview of 64 Express Lanes. Secretary of Transportation Aubrey Layne April 12, 2017

Final Technical Report RAILYARD ALIGNMENT AND BENEFITS STUDY. Appendix F: Traffic Analysis, I 280

Congestion Reducing Activities. Toby Carr GDOT Director of Planning April 10, 2014

State Road 54/56 Tampa Bay s Northern Loop. The Managed Lane Solution Linking I-75 to the Suncoast Parkway

Commuter Connections Regional TDM Marketing Group Meeting

Simulating Street-Running LRT Terminus Station Options in Dense Urban Environments Shaumik Pal, Rajat Parashar and Michael Meyer

New Measure A Expenditure Categories DEFINITIONS OF ELIGIBLE EXPENDITURES Adopted March 8, 2007

Dear City Council Members,

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

3.16 TRANSPORTATION, CIRCULATION, AND PARKING Regulatory Setting Environmental Setting ROADWAY SYSTEM

I-80 Corridor Overhaul

Transcription:

CapCity Corridor History and Milestones

CapCity Partners

CapCity Origin and Destination analysis Origins and Destinations Destinations based on Origins North of I-80 8% O & D data prepared by SACOG

Origins and Destinations CapCity Origin and Destination analysis Destinations based on Origins South of Fruitridge 3% O & D data prepared by SACOG

Traffic Incidents The CapCity freeway has more incidents than all other Sacramento Region freeways combined. I-80 15% US-50 12% SR 99 7% I-5 7% SR 70 1% SR 113 1% SR 160 1% SR 65 1% CapCity 55% Regional data comes from California Highway Patrol and Traffic Accident Surveillance and Analysis System (TASAS).

Volume over Capacity No -Future Year (2035) 1,441 11% over capacity 13,100 Volumes Volume Capacity 2015 Corridor System Management Plan (page 32)

Volume over Capacity With Future Year (2035) 16,000 14,000 12,000 10,000 14,700 8,000 6,000 4,000 Volumes (441) 2,000-3% under capacity Capacity Volume (2,000) 2015 Corridor System Management Plan (page 32)

Annual Hours of Delay + 22% + 23% + 9% + 45% Operations Delay Cost study PeMS

Build/No Build Reduced Vehicle Hours of Delay - 25% - 16% Preliminary Investigation Study: Combined AM/PM peak period, NB/SB

Bottlenecks, Queues and Delay Probability of Bottleneck Forming 92% 96% 79% 57% 21% 21% T Street Tribute Road Elvas UP Arden Way 30th and E North of A 2015 Corridor System Management Plan (page 32)

Bottlenecks, Queues and Delay Avg Queue Length (Miles) 2.6 2.35 2.02 2.04 1.5 0.98 T Street Tribute Road Elvas UP Arden Way 30th and E North of A 2015 Corridor System Management Plan (page 32)

Bottlenecks, Queues and Delay Avg Minutes of Delay 78 81 84 51 34 25 T Street Tribute Road Elvas UP Arden Way 30th and E North of A 2015 Corridor System Management Plan (page 32)

Purpose and Need This freeway experiences high travel demand, especially during peak commute periods. This has created severe traffic congestion and impaired mobility along the route. At various locations, travel demand has exceeded highway design capacity, resulting in bottlenecks. These bottlenecks have been created by multiple factors, including high traffic volumes, short weaving and merging areas, lane drops, limited sight distances, inadequate intelligent transportation system (ITS) elements, and incomplete bus/carpool and auxiliary lane networks. Heavy congestion and stop-and-go traffic have contributed to increased vehicle emissions, increased travel costs, and reduced travel time reliability.

CapCity Alternative 1 Roadway Bus on Auxiliary Lane HOV Lane HOV Lane Auxiliary Lane Bus on Section Widened

CapCity Alternative 1 Bridge Bus on Auxiliary Lane HOV Lane HOV Lane Auxiliary Lane Bus on Bike/Pedestrian Lane New Bridge Piers New Bridge Piers

CapCity Alternative 2 Roadway Bike/Pedestrian Lane Bus on Auxiliary Lane HOV Lane HOV Lane Auxiliary Lane Bus on Roadway Roadway

Bike/Pedestrian Lane CapCity Bus on Auxiliary Lane Alternative 2 Bridge HOV Lane HOV Lane Auxiliary Lane Bus on New Bridge New Bridge New Bridge Piers New Bridge Piers New Bridge Piers New Bridge Piers

CapCity Alternative 3 Roadway Bus on Auxiliary Lane Managed Lane Managed Lane Auxiliary Lane Bus on Section Widened

CapCity Alternative 3 Bridge Bus on Auxiliary Lane Managed Lane Auxiliary Lane New Bridge Piers Managed Lane Bus on Bike/Pedestrian Lane New Bridge Piers

CapCity Alternative 4 Roadway Managed Lane Managed Lane

CapCity Managed Lane Alternative 4 Bridge Managed Lane New Bridge Piers Bike/Pedestrian Lane New Bridge Piers

CapCity Alternative 2 Profile 6 7 8 9 150 1 2 3 4 155 6 7 8 9 160 1 2 3 4 165 6 7 8 9 170 1 2 3 4 175 6 7 8 9 180 1 2 3 4 185 6 7 8 9 190 1 2 3 4 195 6 7 8 9 200 1 2 3 4 205 6 7 8 9 210 1 2 3 4 215 6 7 8 9

Managed Lanes Value Priced Lanes Toll Lanes HOT Lanes HOV Lanes Truck Lane Restrictions Use of HOV Lanes by other Vehicle Groups Multi-faceted Managed Lane Facilities Value Priced Lanes Toll Lanes Bus ways Transit ways Exclusive truck facilities Pricing Traditional toll lanes and toll lanes that use congestion pricing, where price is varied during certain time periods in order to manage demand (e.g., peak-period surcharge or off-peak discount). Vehicle eligibility The lanes are managed by allowing certain vehicles or restricting others; minimum occupancy is an example of an eligibility restriction. Access control An example would be express lanes where all vehicles are allowed but access is limited during long stretches of the facility, minimizing turbulence in the flow of vehicles.

Schedule Identify Priority/ Feasibility 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Prepare Study Report/ Development Support Engineering and Environmental Studies Prepare Report & Environmental Document Prepare Plans, Specifications and Estimates. Acquire Permits Right of Way Activities Advertise and Award Construction Contract Construction 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 * Schedule may vary due to unforeseen situations such as approvals, funding availability, etc.

CapCity Connection Clark Peri Manager (916) 825-8168 clark.peri@dot.ca.gov Larry Brohman Outreach (916) 274-0627 larry.brohman@dot.ca.gov Website http://www.capcitycorridor.org/