Neighborhood Design. City Council Update June 4, 2018

Similar documents
Arapahoe Square Zoning + Design Standards & Guidelines Task Force Meeting 9 January 27, 2016

Guthriesville Village Manual of Written & Graphic Design Guidelines

Incentive Zoning. Zoning Ordinance Advisory Committee June 21, Pam Thompson, Senior Planner, Sustainable Development and Construction

ZONING ORDINANCE UPDATE (ZOCO DRAFT ): ADMINISTRATIVE PRACTICES AND DETERMINATIONS RELATED TO BULK, COVERAGE AND PLACEMENT


2200 FIFTH STREET CONTINUED PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW

Three Springs Design Guidelines Fencing and Wall Standards

Street Paving and Sidewalk Policy

Expansion or Enlargement in the Water Yard. Wilson Park Community Centre, October 7, 2017

To: Planning Commission Date: September 19, 2012 From: By: Subject:

RIVERSIDE, Newton MA BH NORMANDY RIVERSIDE LLC. Riverside Station. A green, transit-oriented community

Single Family Detached District Summary of Allowable Uses

7/23/2017 VIA . Michael Hanebutt City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Boulevard, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

Proposed Holmby Westwood

DESIGN CODE. Enterprise West Harlow London Road North Design Code 21

RECOMMENDED MOTION: I MOVE TO PASS SECOND READING AND ADOPT ORDINANCE 556, TO REMOVE NE 173RD STREET FROM THE DESIGNATED PEDESTRIAN-ORIENTED STREETS.

3. Roll Call Planning Commission: Bush, Haines, Hamilton, McDermott, Mintz, Ridell, Robbert

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING, HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT Planning Division/Site Plan Review Committee

1.3 Pedestrian Environments

Non-required Fences Update

Martha Coello, Fairfax County DOT Jeffrey Hermann, Fairfax County DOT Abi Lerner, VDOT. May 19, 2014

FENCE PERMIT APPLICATION

Area of existing house. Gross Flr. area excluding parking. (+1,657 basement) Gross Flr. area inc. covered parking & accessory bldg.

TOWN OF AURORA. Pool Enclosure Permit Guide. PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES Building Division

La Crescent Township Zoning Ordinance

Comments on KXLY DRB Submittal from Southgate Neighborhood Council

4.7 Landscape Provisions.

Design Guidelines: Oakmont Village & Eagle Road Corridor Haverford Township, Delaware County, PA. Comprehensive Plan Addendum

The following is submitted together with the plans and application for the staff and plan commission consideration of approval.

THE ALAMEDA CONCEPT DESIGN COMMUNITY MEETING 3. A Plan for The Beautiful Way JANUARY 28, 2010

Agenda Item 3 Meeting Minutes Review and approval of the January 21, 2009 meeting minutes.

Shared Court Housing Concept Summary

NEW PORCH 162 SQ. FT ENCROACHMENT INTO YARD SET BACKS C L WALL 8'-0"

Sponsored by Mrs. Gina Gregory and Mr. Reggie Copeland.

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Table of Contents City of Shelbyville Unified Development Ordinance

CITY OF MEDINA PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes Tuesday, June 12, 2012

APPENDIX I: ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM AND PROJECT CONSISTENCY STANDARDS

Highland Park Glengarry Court. Landscape design and Fencing rules

Community Meeting February 27, 2007 Dorchester Avenue Transportation & Streetscape Improvements Action Plan February 27, 2007

ORDINANCE NO. XX-2016 N. S.

GARLAND ROAD/GASTON AVENUE/ GRAND AVENUE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT STUDY

Town of Kiawah Island Board of Zoning Appeals

September 9, Planning and Land Development Regulation Commission (PLDRC)

City of Walnut Creek TELEGRAPH AVENUE BART LINE SELF-GUIDED TOD TOUR 19TH STREET BART STATION

COUNCIL POLICY NAME: COUNCIL REFERENCE: 06/119 06/377 09/1C 10llC 12/1C INDEX REFERENCE: POLICY BACKGROUND

Commerce Street Complete Street Project from Good Latimer Expressway to Exposition Avenue

t 15 Lot 16 Lot 25 7 Lot 39 Lot 40 R.P B-3268 ot A

Agenda. 7:00 pm Welcome Charles Monfort, Chair 7:05 pm Upcoming Schedule Park Master Plan Area Plan

Roadway Classification Design Standards and Policies. Pueblo, Colorado November, 2004

Section VIII Community Design

INDEX. Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads INDEX

November 13, Planning and Land Development Regulation Commission (PLDRC)

Omaha s Complete Streets Policy

Vision: Traditional hamlet with an attractive business/pedestrian friendly main street connected to adjacent walkable neighborhoods

TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES

Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) November 21, 2013

Address: City: State: Zip:

Article 1 Administration and Enforcement Article 2 Zoning Districts and Map

Derby Street. Project Updates. Salem, Massachusetts

El Camino Real Precise Plan. Public Draft August 2014

PRESENTED: May 6, 1008 FILE: BYL s 1936 / 1932

Designing Pedestrian Facilities for Accessibility. Module 3 Curb Ramps & Blended Transitions

Driveway Design Criteria

New Planning Code Summary: Better Streets Plan and Curb Cut Restrictions

RENOVATION MASTER PLAN

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN RENDERING A1.0: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN

1758 Astra Road. Variance Application CVRD. Advisory Planning Commission. 9 April 2018

BETHEL ROAD AND SEDGWICK ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY

6. Traditional Neighborhood Design. Fact Sheet

Your views are important. Please fill in a form before you leave. Or alternatively

NO wiring shall be above the pool within 10, measured horizontally, or under a pool within 5, measured horizontally.

REAR YARDS - There shall be a rear yard no less than forty (40) feet.

CONNECTIVITY PLAN. Adopted December 5, 2017 City of Virginia Beach

City of Margate, Florida. Neighborhood Traffic Management Manual

Staff Report Text Amendment Case #: TA

/ ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

AGENDA REPORT. Issue: Discussion of potential improvements on Barnwell Road at Niblick Drive

ADA Training Standard Plans

Southview Blvd & 3 rd Avenue Improvement Project. Public Open House December 4, to 7pm

Update on the Downtown Street Event Closure Recommendations. Briefing to City Council March 26, 2008

Citizen Advisory Group Meeting #8 May 5, Welcome. Today s meeting will focus on: Land Use & Transportation CHARLOTTEPLANNING.

Wall Bracing Examples: Building #1 One-Story

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Lincoln Neighborhood Corridor Plan The LiNC

2 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK X 4 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION

The Public Safety Complex Southampton MA. a critical time

Community Workshop #1 Summary October 2017

RICHARDS STREET BIKE LANE

Designing Complete Streets: What you need to know

*A Certificate of Survey for the property may be on file at City Hall if the house was built after 1984.

Environment and Public Works Committee Presentation

RANDWICK CITY COUNCIL Residential Discussion Paper SUMMARY DOCUMENT

SECTION 8.0 HIGHWAY SETBACK LINES & ROADSIDE REGULATIONS

CITY OF NAPLES STAFF REPORT

CITY OF ANN ARBOR TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM PROCESS OVERVIEW. Petitioner defines the project area limits and gathers petition signatures.

Item to be Addressed Checklist Consideration YES NO N/A Required Description Complete Streets Guidelines

Montgomery County Life Sciences Center Loop Trail

Complete Streets Workshop Follow-up. April 27, 2011 Rockledge City Hall

STATE OF VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COURT } } } } } Decision and Order

Transcription:

Neighborhood Design City Council Update June 4, 2018

Stakeholder Committee Stakeholder Meetings (7 meetings) Planning Commission Update City Council Update Stakeholder Committee Review / Revisions Council Update Public Open House Formal Recommendations, Public Hearings (November - March) (April 3) (April 16) (April 19) (tonight) (TBD) (TBD) SCHEDULE

2014-2016 Monitor teardowns and Neighborhood Association processes Developer / Designer Stakeholder meetings (2) Drafting Committee meetings (5) Public Open House (3) Council Work Session (1) Adoption meetings (2) Revised side setbacks Adjusted height and height interpretation Amended first-floor elevation interpretation Design standards NOT adopted BACKGROUND / PREVIOUS EFFORT

Height R-1A R-1B 35 2.5 Story 29 2 Story BACKGROUND / PREVIOUS EFFORT

Side Setbacks Increased to 6 and 7 in R- 1A and R-1B, respectively 20% of lot width between both sides May be limited further by 30% lot coverage 125 4,480 + s.f. 2,160 + s.f. R-1A R-1B 7 6 BACKGROUND / PREVIOUS EFFORT

Basic Scale and Mass Heights / Setbacks Streetscape Zoning Heights and Setbacks First-floor elevation Second story limits / half-story? Street tree requirements Landscape standards Curb-cut limits? Basic Scale and Mass Volume / Massing Limit footprints [30% max] Break up larger wall planes Limit main mass; secondary mass or wings. Floor-area ratio Architectural massing elements Daylight planes Basic Scale and Mass Relationship to Streetscape Limit driveways / impervious surface Limit garage location and extent Entrance features requirements Façade design Windows requirements Building Pattern Setback / Build-to lines Rhythm mass to voids Quality / Aesthetics Materials - primary and secondary Landscape standards Façade Design details, ornamentation, proportions Architecture Style / Historic Character Pattern books / architectural style requirements Historic preservation and documentation. Demolition review NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER / POLICIES & STRATEGIES

Street tree requirements Minimum frontage greenspace / coordination with PW overall lot greenspace Refine / limit current standards on setback encroachments Break up massing on larger wall planes Require minimum % of windows and doors Limit the extent, projection and massing of garages on front elevation Clarify / revise standards for accessory structures Create non-variance process and criteria to design standards only. RECOMMENDED STRATEGIES

Any new structure Addition of more than 200 square feet of building footprint Construction activity that alters the form or massing of the front elevation or roof structure. Not applicable to non-conformances that aren t subject to construction activity (i.e. existing wall planes, existing driveways) - except street trees. APPLICABILITY

Require street trees where they don t exist (1 per 40 average spacing) Tree Board Recommended List / Great Trees for the Kansas City Region. 2.5 caliper Location priorities. STREET TREES

60% between required front setback and front lot line planted with vegetation Coordinate with Public Works drainage permits / Overall 60% lot greenspace FRONTAGE GREENSPACE

= Entrance Features up to 12 unenclosed (clarified) integrated with design (new) no longer eligible for car port (new) = Other Encroachments up to 2 ; 4 on front or back 200 s.f. max (new) no more than 50% of required setback egress window added to list with 50% setback limit (new) PERMITTED ENCROACHMENTS

Wall Plane & Side Setbacks 500 s.f. or less = basic setback 501 s.f. to 800 s.f. = break up massing with Projecting bays, windows, ornamental offsets - 1.5 min. Step backs or cantilevers - 2 min 801 s.f. or more = 4 additional setback Windows and Entrances 15% Front, rear, and street-facing sides 8% Sides (interior) MASSING / SIDE RELATIONSHIPS

Wall Plane & Side Setbacks 500 s.f. or less = basic setback 501 s.f. to 800 s.f. = break up massing with Projecting bays, windows, ornamental offsets - 1.5 min. Step backs or cantilevers - 2 min 801 s.f. or more = 4 additional setback Windows and Entrances 15% Front, rear, and street-facing sides 8% Sides (interior) MASSING / SIDE RELATIONSHIPS

Wall Plane & Side Setbacks 500 s.f. or less = basic setback 501 s.f. to 800 s.f. = break up massing with Projecting bays, windows, ornamental offsets - 1.5 min. Step backs or cantilevers - 2 min 801 s.f. or more = 4 additional setback Windows and Entrances 15% Front, rear, and street-facing sides 8% Sides (interior) MASSING / SIDE RELATIONSHIPS

Wall Plane & Side Setbacks? 500 s.f. or less = basic setback 501 s.f. to 800 s.f. = break up massing with Projecting bays, windows, ornamental offsets - 1.5 min. Step backs or cantilevers - 2 min 801 s.f. or more = 4 additional setback Windows and Entrances 15% Front, rear, and street-facing sides 8% Sides (interior) MASSING / SIDE RELATIONSHIPS? May require projections or stepbacks to break up mass of façade between 500-800 square feet (approx. 500-600) May require additional window or architectural details to get to 8% of elevation

Wall Plane & Side Setbacks 500 s.f. or less = basic setback 501 s.f. to 800 s.f. = break up massing with Projecting bays, windows, ornamental offsets - 1.5 min. Step backs or cantilevers - 2 min 801 s.f. or more = 4 additional setback Windows and Entrances 15% Front, rear, and street-facing sides 8% Sides (interior) MASSING / SIDE RELATIONSHIPS

Wall Plane & Side Setbacks? 500 s.f. or less = basic setback 501 s.f. to 800 s.f. = break up massing with Projecting bays, windows, ornamental offsets - 1.5 min. Step backs or cantilevers - 2 min 801 s.f. or more = 4 additional setback Windows and Entrances 15% Front, rear, and street-facing sides 8% Sides (interior) MASSING / SIDE RELATIONSHIPS? May require projections or stepbacks to break up mass of façade between 500-800 square feet (approx. 600-700)

Wall Plane & Side Setbacks 500 s.f. or less = basic setback 501 s.f. to 800 s.f. = break up massing with Projecting bays, windows, ornamental offsets - 1.5 min. Step backs or cantilevers - 2 min 801 s.f. or more = 4 additional setback Windows and Entrances? 15% Front, rear, and street-facing sides 8% Sides (interior) MASSING / SIDE RELATIONSHIPS? May require additional window or architectural details to get to 8% of elevation

Considered several alternatives. Decided against specific standard; defer to 60% frontage greenspace Coordinate with Public Works ROW permits. Update: Exception for 50% on narrow lots on busy streets DRIVEWAY LIMITS

Max. 40% of front elevation or 24, whichever is greater Massing / projection limits: 500 s.f.if flush or set back from front building line 360 s.fup to 4 in front of front building line 216 s.f.(plus dormers) 4 to 12 in front, with front entry feature requirement. More than 12 only if side-entry and limited to 360 f.massing. 2 forward-facing doors in all cases GARAGE PLACEMENT & EXTENT

Max. 40% of front elevation or 24, whichever is greater Massing / projection limits: 500 s.f.if flush or set back from front building line 360 s.fup to 4 in front of front building line 216 s.f.(plus dormers) 4 to 12 in front, with front entry feature requirement. More than 12 only if side-entry and limited to 360 f.massing. 2 forward-facing doors GARAGE PLACEMENT & EXTENT

Max. 40% of front elevation or 24, whichever is greater Massing / projection limits: 500 s.f.if flush or set back from front building line 360 s.fup to 4 in front of front building line 216 s.f.(plus dormers) 4 to 12 in front, with front entry feature requirement. More than 12 only if side-entry and limited to 360 f.massing. 2 forward-facing doors GARAGE PLACEMENT & EXTENT

Max. 40% of front elevation or 24, whichever is greater Massing / projection limits: 500 s.f.if flush or set back from front building line 360 s.fup to 4 in front of front building line 216 s.f.(plus dormers) 4 to 12 in front, with front entry feature requirement. More than 12 only if side-entry and limited to 360 f.massing. 2 forward-facing doors GARAGE PLACEMENT & EXTENT

Max. 40% of front elevation or 24, whichever is greater Massing / projection limits: 500 s.f.if flush or set back from front building line 360 s.fup to 4 in front of front building line 216 s.f.(plus dormers) 4 to 12 in front, with front entry feature requirement. More than 12 only if side-entry and limited to 360 f.massing. 2 forward-facing doors GARAGE PLACEMENT & EXTENT

Max. 40% of front elevation or 24, whichever is greater Massing / projection limits: Find 3-car with front orientation, but offset 500 s.f.if flush or set back from front building line 360 s.fup to 4 in front of front building line 216 s.f.(plus dormers) 4 to 12 in front, with front entry feature requirement. More than 12 only if side-entry and limited to 360 f.massing. 2 forward-facing doors - GARAGE PLACEMENT & EXTENT

Max. 40% of front elevation or 24, whichever is greater Massing / projection limits: Find 4-car with side orientation 500 s.f.if flush or set back from front building line 360 s.fup to 4 in front of front building line 216 s.f.(plus dormers) 4 to 12 in front, with front entry feature requirement. More than 12 only if side-entry and limited to 360 f.massing. 2 forward-facing doors -4-car, side facing GARAGE PLACEMENT & EXTENT

Max. 40% of front elevation or 24, whichever is greater Massing / projection limits: 500 s.f. if flush or set back from front building line 360 s.f up to 4 in front of front building line 216 s.f. (plus dormers) 4 to 12 in front, with front entry feature requirement. More than 12 only if side-entry and limited to 360 s.f. massing. 2 forward-facing doors GARAGE PLACEMENT & EXTENT Prominent gable limited to 216 s.f. by offset of upper gable or dormer (see previous 2 examples) or brought back w/in 4 of main building

Max. 40% of front elevation or 24, whichever is greater Massing / projection limits: 500 s.f. if flush or set back from front building line 360 s.f up to 4 in front of front building line 216 s.f. (plus dormers) 4 to 12 in front, with front entry feature requirement w/in 4. More than 12 only if side-entry and limited to 360 s.f. massing. 2 forward-facing doors GARAGE PLACEMENT & EXTENT Entry feature needs to project w/in 4 of garage; Prominent gable limited to 216 s.f. by offset of upper gable or dormer or brought back w/in 4 of main building

Max. 40% of front elevation or 24, whichever is greater Massing / projection limits: 500 s.f. if flush or set back from front building line 360 s.f up to 4 in front of front building line 216 s.f. (plus dormers) 4 to 12 in front, with front entry feature requirement w/in 4. More than 12 only if side-entry and limited to 360 s.f. massing. GARAGE PLACEMENT & EXTENT 2 forward-facing doors More than 24 / 40% of front elevation Entry feature needs to project w/in 4 of garage; Prominent gable limited to 216 s.f. by offset of upper gable or dormer or brought back w/in 4 of main building

Max. 40% of front elevation or 24, whichever is greater Massing / projection limits: 500 s.f. if flush or set back from front building line 360 s.f up to 4 in front of front building line 216 s.f. (plus dormers) 4 to 12 in front, with front entry feature requirement w/in 4. More than 12 only if side-entry and limited to 360 s.f. massing. GARAGE PLACEMENT & EXTENT 2 forward-facing doors More than 24 / 40% of front elevation High profile needs to be brought down to 216 s.f. by or brought back w/in 4 of main building

Find 3-car with front orientation, but without off-set Max. 40% of front elevation or 24, whichever is greater Massing / projection limits: 500 s.f. if flush or set back from front building line 360 s.f up to 4 in front of front building line 216 s.f. (plus dormers) 4 to 12 in front, with front entry feature requirement w/in 4. More than 12 only if side-entry and limited to 360 s.f. massing. 2 forward-facing doors GARAGE PLACEMENT & EXTENT More than 40% of front elevation More than 4-12 in front; more than 216 360 s.f. More than 2 forward facing bays without offset or side orientation

Stakeholder Committee Stakeholder Meetings (7 meetings) Planning Commission Update City Council Update Stakeholder Committee Review / Revisions Council Update Public Open House Formal Recommendations, Public Hearings (November - March) (April 3) (April 16) (April 19) (tonight) (TBD) (TBD) SCHEDULE