Site Improvements

Similar documents
APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

Bases, Ballasts, and Paving

Supplemental Plan Check Corrections Sheet for Bicycle Parking Ordinance (Effective 3/13/2013)

LEED Pilot Credit Library

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTE:

CHAPTER 16 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS

2016 Updates to the Downtown bicycle parking map (pg 5) and bicycle parking capacity (pg 7) located in Appendix A on page 11.

INTER- AND INTRA-CONNECTIVITY INTERPRETIVE GUIDELINES

Crosswalk Policy Revisions & Pedestrian & Bicycle Connection Plans. Presentation to Sanibel City Council July 16, 2013

Chapter BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENTS

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CRITERIA

CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES

City of Roseville Section 13 Design Standards. _Bikeways January 2016 SECTION 13 BIKEWAYS

GENERAL. 1. Description

Executive Summary Route 30 Corridor Master Plan

FOCUS AREA 1 - Alberta Avenue Pocket Park 3 (121 Ave and 92 St)

TRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES Clarksville Street Department

01. VICINITY OF GREENBRAE POC: EXISTING CONDITIONS

Southside Pilot Proposal

Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) November 21, 2013

General Design Factors

Bike Rack Design and Placement Design Standards

Roadway Classification Design Standards and Policies. Pueblo, Colorado November, 2004

Bedfordshire County Council Cycle Parking Guidance Annex 1 Development standards Annex 2 Parking dimensions and layouts

Appendix C. Bicycle Route Signage

Traffic Impact Memorandum. May 22, 2018

CURBSIDE ACTIVITY DESIGN

Vision: Traditional hamlet with an attractive business/pedestrian friendly main street connected to adjacent walkable neighborhoods

10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE

HENDERSON DEVELOPMENT 213, 217, 221, 221 ½, 223 HENDERSON AVENUE and 65 TEMPLETON STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW.

7/23/2017 VIA . Michael Hanebutt City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Boulevard, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

Chapter 2. Bellingham Bicycle Master Plan Chapter 2: Policies and Actions

NASHVILLE BICYCLE PARKING GUIDE

Chapter VISION, MISSION, AND GOALS AND OBJECTIVES. Vision. Mission. Goals and Objectives CONNECTING COMMUNITIES ACROSS THE ST.

MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. WAY

NJDOT Complete Streets Checklist

City of Lima Bicycle Parking Guide

City of Gainesville Transportation/Roadway Needs PROJECT SUMMARY

Pattullo Bridge Replacement Project Community Connections Phase 2 Consultation. Appendix 3: Open House Display Boards

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards

DESIGN CODE. Enterprise West Harlow London Road North Design Code 21

Final Sidewalk Feasibility Study

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Providence Downtown Transit Connector STAKEHOLDER MEETING #2. Stakeholder Meeting #1 October 24, 2016

NM-POLICY 1: Improve service levels, participation, and options for non-motorized transportation modes throughout the County.

ROUNDABOUTS/TRAFFIC CIRCLES

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Non-Motorized Transportation 7-1

TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR BICYCLE FACILITIES

Support Infrastructure

Driveway Design Criteria

Land Use Bicycle Spaces Required Type Residential

SECTION TRAFFIC REGULATIONS

Complete Streets. Designing Streets for Everyone. Sarnia

PUBLIC REALM MASTER PLAN

December 15, City of Ottawa Planning and Growth Management Branch 110 Laurier Ave. W., 4 th Floor Ottawa, ON K1P 1J1

Highland Park Glengarry Court. Landscape design and Fencing rules

Introduction. Using the Checklist. TDM-Supportive Development Design and Infrastructure Checklist Version 1.0 (30 June 2017) City of Ottawa

FONTAINE AVENUE STUDY Final Report

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Traffic Circulation & Pedestrian Safety Study

Aurora Urban Street Standards For Transit Oriented Developments and Urban Centers

Plainfield Gateway. Plainfield Context

Double the amount of bicycle ridership while at the same time reducing the number of bicycle crashes by one-third.

MUTCD Part 6: Temporary Traffic Control

Gordon Proctor Director Policy on Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel on ODOT Owned or Maintained Facilities

Roadway Design Manual

SECTION 3 STREET DESIGN

ORDINANCE NO

Contents. Champaign-Urbana Mass Transit District Stop Placement Guidelines

INDEX. Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads INDEX

UPDATE ARLINGTON COUNTY. Bicycle Parking Standards

Complete Streets Successes, Opportunities, and Challenges

Bikeways Network and Facilities

Solana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS)

Access requests to County streets and roadways are processed through one of the following methods:

EAGLE MOUNTAIN CITY Residential Fencing Guidelines

14 TH STREET TRANSPORTATION & STREETSCAPE DESIGN STUDY PLAN B PLAN B TRANSPORTATION & STREETSCAPE RECOMMENDATIONS

Appendix F: Wayfinding Protocol and Best Practices

Report. Typical Sections. City of Middleton, WI

Virginia Hospital Center Expansion

City of Dallas Standards and Guidelines for Traffic Control and Safety Treatments at Trail-Road Crossings

MUTCD Part 6D: Pedestrian and Worker Safety

On Road Bikeways Part 1: Bicycle Lane Design

CPC CA Appendix A: Proposed Ordinance Page 1 ORDINANCE NO.

Prince George s County plans, policies, and projects

Shared Use Path Design

complete streets design and construction standards public primer City of Edmonton

Overview. Illinois Bike Summit IDOT Complete Streets Policy Presentation. What is a Complete Street? And why build them? And why build them?

Bicycle Parking. A Guide for Business Owners & Cyclists in the City of Brockville

Section 6. Off-street Bicycle Space Regulations

4.0 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDIES

Tonight is for you. Learn everything you can. Share all your ideas.

Elon Bicycle, Pedestrian and Lighting Plan. Pedestrian Rail Crossings Study

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE Traffic Department MEMORANDUM

City of Coronado Bicycle Map, Schools, Traffic Signals and Crossing Guard Locations

INDOT Complete Streets Guideline & Policy

Transcription:

Sections Included In This Standard: 1.1 Bicycle Facilities 1.2 Guardrails 1.3 Parking Bumpers 1.4 Traffic Signage 1.5 Traffic Signals 1.6 Traffic Impact Studies 1.7 Vision Triangle 1.8 Bus Stop Shelters 1.1 BICYCLE FACILITIES A. DESIGN GUIDE FOR BICYCLE FACILITIES: Bicycle facilities should be designed in accord with the "Florida Bicycle Facilities Planning and Design Manual," issued by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and the Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities published by the American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHTO). B. REQUIREMENT FOR PROVIDING BICYCLE LANES AND PATHS: The requirement for providing lighted bicycle lanes and paths with all new road construction, and major reconstruction of existing roads, is given in Section 02500. C. BICYCLE PARKING: Areas designated for bicycle parking should be adequately lit. Consult with the Physical Plant Division, A/E Department and Section 16500 within these Standards regarding lighting design. D. BICYCLE PARKING QUANTITIES: Provisions for bicycle access to facilities and on-site storage of bicycles shall be addressed for all campus projects. Accommodations must be made, when applicable, for employees, visitors and office bicycles. The University of Florida has developed standards for the number of bicycle parking spaces to be provided for a facility based upon a building's usage, number of employees and visitors, and relative location to an existing auto-free zone, central parking facility, and other campus buildings. These standards are: NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING SPACES TO BE PROVIDED BUILDING USE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES Single Residential (Dorms, 1 space per 1.5 beds Sororities, Fraternities) Family Residential 1 space per bedroom, plus 1 guest space per each 6 bedrooms Food Service 1 space per 20 seats, plus 1 space per each 15 employees on largest shift Retail Sales 1 space for each 1500 gross sq. ft. Lecture Hall, Theater, Auditorium, 1 space per each 40 seats, or 1 space for each 500 sq. ft., whichever is greater Stadium Recreation Center or Gymnasium 1 space for each 2000 gross sq. ft. Public Use Outdoor Recreation, not 1 space for each 1500 gross sq. ft. of field or court facility adjacent to any residential facility Academic Building 1 space per each 5 seats in a classroom or 1 space for each 250 gross sq. ft. of public space, whichever is greater, plus 1 space per each 10 employees Library 10% of the average daily number of student users, plus 1 space per each 10 employees Administration/Offices 1 space for each 10 employees Infirmary/Medical 1 space for each 20 patient beds Museum or Art Gallery 1 space per each 40 seats (with auditorium), 1 space for each 1000 public sq. ft. UF Design and Construction Standards Page 1 of 7

and 1 space per each 10 employees E. BICYCLE RACKS 1. The standard parking structure used by the University of Florida for supporting and securing a bicycle is the black "inverted U" style bicycle rack. This rack is made of 40 gauge-galvanized steel covered with white PVC material. Other style racks may be acceptable for specific locations with approval to be obtained by the Project Manager prior to installation through submission of a Standards Project Deviation Request Form. Alternate rack styles shall be considered acceptable only if they meet each of the following criteria: a. Constructed of durable materials with no moving parts; b. Able to accommodate various styles of bicycles and locks (including narrow U- locks); c. Able to support the bicycle by the frame; d. Enable the bicycle to be secured at multiple points including both wheels and the frame; e. Designed with a profile that has no protruding parts, and will not create a trip hazard to pedestrians; and f. Design so that the proper method of use is obvious, and that improper parking will not decrease rack capacity. 2. Refer to Drawing 02840-A at the end of this section for illustration of inverted U style bike rack. 3. Bicycle parking displaced by construction shall be relocated with a temporary rack. 4. Dimensions and locations (or as-built drawings) of new bicycle parking facilities should be given to the PPD A/E Department for updating of Campus maps. F. PLACEMENT AND ARRANGEMENT OF BICYCLE RACKS 1. The "inverted U" rack is designed to secure two bicycles fastened to vertical supports by a "U lock" or cable. Most bicycles are approximately 68 inches in length. When properly secured to the "inverted U" style rack, a back wheel of the bike projects out about 3-4 feet from the vertical support of the rack. 2. Rows of "U" racks should be arranged to allow for ample maneuvering on a concrete pad. The edge of the concrete pad perpendicular to the direction of bike parking is to be at least 6 feet wide to ensure the rear tire of a secured bike does not rest on the ground or lawn and that there is ample walk space behind the bicycles. 3. Refer to Drawings 02840-B and 02840-C at the end of this section for two variations (freestanding rows, against a wall) of the above-described bicycle rack layout. Bicycle rack installations should be designed accordingly. 4. Bicycle rack installations shall provide maximum visibility utilizing principles of Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED), located in active public areas, lit in accordance with the requirements of Division 26 of these Standards, with adjacent landscape material that preserves a clear view between three and seven feet from ground level. UF Design and Construction Standards Page 2 of 7

G. OTHER BICYCLE AMENITIES 1.2 GUARDRAILS 1. An effort is to be made to locate bicycle parking as close to the principal entrance to a building as feasible in order to enhance security of the bicycle and the cyclist and also as a means of encouraging bike usage through convenience, efficiency and the provision of superior facilities. When a building is located close to a parking garage and/or open lot, racks may be located at the parking facility closest to the building entrance in lieu of installation near the building entrance. Bike racks shall be located within 200 yards of a building entrance and in proximity to a changing/shower facility. 2. Whenever possible, bicycle parking should be covered particularly for long-term bicycle parking such as locations near residence halls and graduate family housing. Covered bicycle parking may be accomplished utilizing building overhangs or by construction of a free standing, lighted cover. 3. Bicycle parking is to be provided in conjunction with parking garages and lots. There is no fixed recommendation on the number of racks or location of racks within these facilities. A rule-of-thumb is to provide bike parking for one-third the number of automobile spaces when it is likely that there shall be significant transfer activity from one mode of travel to the other. 4. Guidance for bicycle paths, signage, bridges and other appurtenances can be found in Section 321000 and in the references cited in this section. Guardrails shall meet Florida Department of Transportation standards. 1.3 PARKING BUMPERS Parking bumpers shall meet Florida Department of Transportation standards or be an approved equal. 1.4 TRAFFIC SIGNAGE A. STREET NAME SIGNS: Street name signs (orange lettering on blue background) for University of Florida roads and drives are made and installed by the Physical Plant Division. Consult with the Project Manager concerning the need for such signage and financial responsibility. B. PARKING SIGNS: Parking signs for University of Florida parking are made and installed by the Physical Plant Division. Consult with the Project Manager concerning the need for such signage and financial responsibility. C. TRAFFIC SIGNS: 1. Traffic signs for placement along University of Florida roads and drives are made and installed by the Physical Plant Division. Consult with the Project Manager concerning the need for such signage and financial responsibility. 2. Traffic signage shall be designed in accordance with the latest edition of the "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways," U.S. Department of Transportation. UF Design and Construction Standards Page 3 of 7

1.5 TRAFFIC SIGNALS Traffic signals shall be designed in accordance with the latest edition of the "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways," U.S. Department of Transportation. Consult with the Project Manager concerning the need for signalization and financial responsibility. 1.6 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDIES Traffic impact studies shall be conducted for all parking structures, and may be required for other types of construction deemed to have the potential of impacting transportation facilities in the vicinity. When required, such studies shall be coordinated with the Director of Transportation and Parking Services and the planner responsible for the campus Comprehensive Master Plan. The first step in the process is approval of the study area, which shall be not less than ¼ mile area around the site. Second, study parameters shall be approved including traffic count procedures. The trip generation and trip distribution parameters shall also be approved prior to the final analysis. Intersection level of service shall be analyzed using the Highway Capacity Software (2000 or latest version). Results of the traffic impact study shall address peak hour conditions and include roadway capacity, intersection level of service, and access for bicycles, pedestrians and transit. The results shall include recommendations for any necessary modifications to traffic signals and other transportation system management techniques. 1.7 VISION TRIANGLE The vision triangle is a portion of land on the corner of intersecting roads and/or driveways where nothing is permitted to be built, placed, or grown that would limit or obstruct the sight distance of motorist entering or leaving the intersection. The purpose of the vision triangle is to ensure that there is adequate and safe visibility at intersections. The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Standards (most recent version) shall govern the vision triangle definition. The university shall prohibit the construction, erection, placement, growth, maintenance or allowance of any building, structure, fence, wall, sign, canopy, vegetation, or obstruction of any kind within the vision triangle that impede views in the vertical plane between two-feet from ground level and eight-feet from the ground level. Diagrams of vision triangle dimensions can be found in the AASHTO Standards and also in the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Roadway and Traffic Design Standards, 2000 Edition, Standards Index 546. 1.8 BUS STOP SHELTERS The University of Florida has adopted a bus stop shelter standard. Contact the Director of Transportation and Parking Services for specifications. UF Design and Construction Standards Page 4 of 7

- INSERT BIKE RACK DETAIL (Dwg. 02840-A) ILLUSTRATION HERE - UF Design and Construction Standards Page 5 of 7

- INSERT FIRST BIKE RACK LAYOUT (Dwg. 02840-B) ILLUSTRATION HERE - UF Design and Construction Standards Page 6 of 7

- INSERT SECOND BIKE RACK LAYOUT (Dwg. 02840-C) ILLUSTRATION HERE - END OF SECTION UF Design and Construction Standards Page 7 of 7