Pupil Transportation Child Safety Zone Study

Similar documents
ENFIELD BOARD OF EDUCATION ENFIELD, CONNECTICUT

Board Policy Statement Transportation of Pupils Approved on June 1, 2015

Policy 3541 School Bus Transportation December 2007 I. Introduction The Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Board of Education directs the superintendent to

POLICY FOR NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING

CHAPTER 7 CIRCULATION

Traffic Impact Study. Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio. TMS Engineers, Inc. June 5, 2017

Special education/504 students shall be adjudged on an individual basis, in accordance with their Individual Education Plans (IEPs)/504 Plans.

Table of Contents. I. Introduction 1. II. Elements of the School Crossing Program 1

TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES

Regional School District #19 Transportation Policy

Town of Clarkstown Traffic Calming Program. Table of Contents

School Zone Traffic Control Policy

Instructions for Completion of Hazard Evaluation Requests

Student Pedestrian Safety Fiddlers Canyon Elementary Community Council 2012

CROSSING GUARD PLACEMENT CONSIDERATIONS AND GAP ASSESSMENT

Town of Orangetown Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program

LTAC: Katie Mencarini, Central & Hampton Roads streets and a fifteen minute debrief to discuss the findings. Participants walked along Mill Road

THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF TORRINGTON, CONNECTICUT TRANSPORTATION POLICY 6200

SPRING-FORD AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT

INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM

Instructions for Completion of Hazard Variance Requests

Community Transportation Plan

Ch. 447 HAZARDOUS WALKING ROUTES CHAPTER 447. HAZARDOUS WALKING ROUTES

MANUAL FOR SCHOOL CROSSING CONTROL

Appendix T CCMP TRAIL TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION DESIGN STANDARD

SANTA CLARA COUNTYWIDE BICYCLE PLAN August 2008

July 5, Arthur R. Ware, Jr. Elementary School 2017 Safe Routes to School Walkabout Report

PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY 613 IMPACT ATTENUATOR WORK DESCRIPTION 3

FORM A PASCO COUNTY ACCESS CONNECTION PERMIT APPLICATION

Speed Control & Limits

Traffic Impact Memorandum. May 22, 2018

SCHOOL CROSSING PROTECTION CRITERIA

CITY OF COCONUT CREEK IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING

VIII. Project Prioritization & Implementation

TRAINER NOTES FOR LESSON PLAN School Bus Drivers Inservice TITLE OF LESSON: LOADING & UNLOADING STUDENTS SAFELY

Traffic Calming Policy Newtown Township, Delaware County, PA

PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY 405 LIMB MANAGEMENT

Durrance Elementary School

Getting Your SRTS Project Funded. Ryan Snyder

CITY OF SASKATOON COUNCIL POLICY

DRAFT. A fifth objective, other considerations, has been added to capture considerations not captured by the four primary objectives.

Beginning School Bus Driver Curriculum UNIT IX. FIELD TRIPS and TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. Revised 09/2011 Revised 10/2013 (Instructional Content)

AAA School Safety Patrol Lifesaving Nomination

A Matter of Fairness: ROCOG s Environmental Justice Protocol. What is Mobility Limitation?

Act 47 Exception Application Process (Permitting Bicycle Travel on Freeways)

Transportation Safety Plan. PURSUANT TO Section EC & Section VC

City of Tamarac, Florida Traffic Calming Policy

Prepared By: Town of Waxhaw Traffic Calming Policy

SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED FEBRUARY 1, 2018

ADA TRANSITION PLAN 2013

TORONTO MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 886, FOOTPATHS, PEDESTRIAN WAYS, BICYCLE PATHS, BICYCLE LANES AND CYCLE TRACKS. Chapter 886

Non-Motorized Transportation 7-1

ORANGE COUNTY TRAFFIC COMMITTEE. Intersection Control. Constituent. Deepthi Arabolu. Relocate Stop Sign

SCHOOL CROSSING PROTECTION CRITERIA

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

RURAL HIGHWAY SHOULDERS THAT ACCOMMODATE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN USE (TxDOT Project ) June 7, Presented by: Karen Dixon, Ph.D., P.E.

Bylaw No SPEED BYLAW PAGE 1 Code 04/10

PROPOSAL: Review of Alaska DOT&PF project 68471, Glacier Highway reconstruction and pedestrian improvements from

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. North Harrison Street (Lee Highway to Little Falls Road) Comparative Analysis. Prepared for:

TRAFFIC ACTION PLAN. North Central Neighborhood CITY OF SAN MATEO

West Dimond Blvd Upgrade Jodhpur Street to Sand Lake Road

MEMORANDUM TERESA MCCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF RESTRICTING PARKING ADJACENT TO 170 AND 171 BRISCO ROAD

Vermont Permit Test Flash Cards

A5.1 Permitted activities

Hidden Oaks Elementary School

Implementing the Three Es of School Zone Traffic Calming

DeForest Area School District Transportation and Student Conduct Guide

IC Chapter 3. Traffic Control Signals

TRANSPORTATION SAFETY PLAN

TRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES Clarksville Street Department

Drag and drop pic and stretch/crop to the limits of the blue rectangle (delete this text box) Maxey Elementary School

Kennesaw Mountain National Battlefield Park Mountain Road Alternatives

TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT STUDY

TRAFFIC ACTION PLAN. Laurie Meadows Neighborhood CITY OF SAN MATEO

Access Management in the Vicinity of Intersections

Geometric Design Tables

Chapter 3.9 Timbercrest Elementary School. Volusia County MPO. November 2008

6.0 PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FACILITIES 6.1 INTRODUCTION 6.2 BICYCLE DEMAND AND SUITABILITY Bicycle Demand

Appendix A-6. Signing and Marking Guidelines. Number Name Pages. 2B.06 Signing at T Intersections 1. 2B.12 Pedestrians in Crosswalk 1

City of Charlottesville Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update

Vallecito Elementary School. Travel Plan

Lawrence Avenue West Speed Limit Amendment

Meadow Woods Elementary School

Swamp Road Residents Study

Basic Rules of Pedestrian Safety (Primary, Elementary)

Woodward Hill Elementary School School Safety and Operation Review

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 21, 2017

Chapter 315 TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. Section Manual and Specifications For Traffic Control Devices.

Driver Education Ch. 4: Safe Driving Rules & Regulations. Ms. Marx

IC Chapter 3. Traffic Control Signals

SCHOOL BUS SAFETY REGULATIONS

A Safe Routes to School Survey in Hillsborough County

SECTION V - CIRCULATION PLAN

Traffic Control Signals Cosburn Avenue and Todmorden Lane/ Private Access

SETTINGS AND OPPORTUNITIES MOBILITY & ACCESS

Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Toolbox (Excerpt from Figure 3.1)

section 4 Existing Conditions, Issues, and Options

County of Greenville South Carolina. Traffic Calming Program Neighborhood Traffic Education Program and Speed Hump Program

City of Elizabeth City Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines

DeForest Area School District Transportation and Student Conduct Guide

Transcription:

Pupil Transportation Child Safety Zone Study For Peekskill City School District 1031 Elm Street Peekskill, New York 10566 David Fine Robin Zimmerman Paul Guglielmo Karen Gard Superintendent of Schools School Business Administrator School Administrator Secretary of Transportation By Pupil Transportation Safety Institute (PTSI) Senior Management Consultant Dr. Richard R. Ahola 10 Adler Drive Suite 102 East Syracuse, New York 13057 Phone: 315-475-1386 1-800-836-2210 Fax: 315-475-4055 Email:Rahola@stny.rr.com Web: www.psti.org November 2015

I. Introduction The Child Safety Transportation Act permits school districts to transport pupils for distances less than statutory requirements if they would encounter hazards while walking to school. There are three types of hazards identified by legislation: Highways without sidewalks or adequate shoulders; Highway intersections; Highway Railroad intersections. An Amendment to the Child Safety Zone Act make the expense for the transportation on the basis of hazard a contingent expense eligible for State Transportation Aid. The Peekskill City School District asked the Pupil Transportation Safety Institute to evaluate the possibility of establishing Child Safety Zones pursuant to permit transportation on the basis of hazards. This report is the result of PTSI s analysis based on fieldwork carried out by PTSI s Senior Management Consultant Dr. Richard Ahola in November 2015. II. Limitations for Establishing Child Safety Zones The Peekskill City School District includes the City of Peekskill extensive sidewalks, and 25 30 MPH speed limits. Many of the road intersections are four way stops or stop lights; some with pedestrian signals. The city employs crossing guards who assist pupils walking to and from school. Eligibility for pupil transportation in the Peekskill City School District is currently based on a distance policy approved by the district voters. The policy provides school bus transportation for pupils living more than the following distances from school. School Grade Level Eligibility Distance Woodside K 1 ½ Mile Oakside 2 3 1 Mile Hillcrest 4 5 1 Mile

Potential Safety Zones Discussions between PTSI consultant and school officials identified the following school attendance zones as possibilities for establishing child safety zones: Woodside Elementary Oakside Elementary Hillcrest Elementary Peekskill Middle School (6 8 grades) Peekskill High school (9 12 grades) *No transportation is provided to Uriah Hill Elementary (pre-k). PTSI was asked to evaluate these schools for possible child safety zones. Many highways on the city were discounted due to the presence of sidewalks and 25 30 MPH speed limits. Under the point system established by the Department of Transportation in consultations with the State Police and the New York State Education Department, no points are allowed for roads and streets with sidewalks and have speed limits under 40 MPH; these do not generate any points. Also, no points are allowed for intersections with crossing guards and all way stop signs. NYS DOT guidelines identify factors for hazardous conditions. Hazards are assigned point values when added together and used to establish a potential Child Safety Zone. Up to two greatest hazards may be considered. The total number of points required to qualify a pupil for transportation on the bus is if a hazard is: Grades K 8 with 1 hazard 12 points Grades K 8 with 2 hazards 21 points Grades 9 12 with 1 hazard 15 points Grades 9 12 with 2 hazards 2 The two greatest types of hazards present in the Peekskill City School District are pupils walking along highways without sidewalks or adequate shoulders (in some cases no shoulders) and crossing busy road intersections. For each potential Child Safety Zone in the district, points total are assigned according to DOT guidelines. Since no pupil crosses railroad tracks to and from school, highway railroad crossings were not evaluated. When the district highways were evaluated, A.M. and P.M. traffic counts of 15 minute periods were recorded; walking distances along hazardous streets were measured using maps and automobile odometers.

The Following tables summarize scores needed for transportation in Child Safety Zones: TABLE 1 NUMBER OF QUALIFYING POINT REQUIRED Total number of points required to qualify for POINTS transportation A. Grades K 8 with 1 HAZARD 12 B. Grades K 8 with 2 Greatest HAZARDS 21 C. Grades 9 12 with 1 HAZARD 15 D. Grades 9 12 with 2 Greatest HAZARDS 27 TABLE 2 HIGHWAYS WITHOUT SIDEWALKS OR ADEQUATE SHOULDERS SITUATION POINTS 1. Student walks on a sidewalk, shoulder or roadway with a given length: A. Sidewalk or shoulder >= 5 feet wide: 0 B. Shoulder < 5 feet wide:* * 1 point for every 500 ft. or fraction thereof; examples: 1 to 500 ft. = 1 point, 501 ft. to 1000 ft. = 2 points C. Roadway with no shoulder: ** ** 1 point for every 300 ft. or fraction thereof; examples: 1 to 300 ft. = 1 point, 301 ft. to 600 ft. = 2 points D. Roadway with a narrow bridge or overpass: *** *** 1 point for every 25 ft. or fraction thereof; examples: 1 to 25 ft., 26 ft. to 50 ft. = 2 points 2. Student walks away on roadway or shoulder < 5 ft. wide with 15 minute traffic volumes: A. Low (L) less than 50 vehicles 1 B. Medium (M) 50 to 100 vehicles 3 C. High (H) more than 100 vehicles 5 3. Student walks on roadway or shoulder < 5 ft. wide with a speed limit > = 40 MPH: A. 40 MPH 1 B. 45 MPH 2 C. 50 MPH 3 D. 55 MPH 4

TABLE 3 HIGHWAY INTERSECTIONS SITUATION POINTS 4. Student crosses highway intersection with the following degree of traffic control: A. All way stop signs, an adult crossing guard, or a pedestrian bridge/underpass with 500 feet of the crossing 0 B. Traffic signal with pedestrian devices 1 per lane (*) C. Stop signs, or a traffic signal without 2 per lane pedestrian devices (*) D. No traffic control measures 3 per lane (*) 5. Student walks on roadway or shoulder < 5 ft. wide with 15 minute traffic volumes of: A. Low (L) - less than 50 vehicles 1 B. Medium(M) 50 to 100 vehicles 3 C. High (H) more than 100 vehicles 5 6. Student crosses a highway intersection with a speed limit of: A. 40 MPH 1 B. 45 MPH 2 C. 50 MPH 3 D. 55 MPH 4 (*) Up to 4 lanes may be considered (*) Up to 4 lanes may be considered TABLE 4 HIGHWAY RAILROAD GRADE CROSSING SITUATION POINTS 7. Student crosses an active railroad crossing during the normal school crossing period: A. 1 or 2 tracks and 0 trains 0 1 train 5 2 trains 9 3 or more trains 13 B. 3 or more tracks and 0 trains 0 1 train 7 2 trains 11 3 or more trains 15

Traffic counts for 15 minute periods during school walking hours established low traffic volume for Ringgold Street (less than 50 cars in 15 minutes) adjacent to Woodside Elementary School. While a moderate volume (50 to 100 cars) for streets, within one mile, of the Oakside and Hillcrest Elementary School areas. Traffic counts applicable for Middle School and High School pupils are the four lane section of Route 6, exceeded 100 car in 15 minutes (heavy traffic volumes). The following observations and calculations are provided for the Woodside, Oakside and Hillcrest Elementary Schools. III. Woodside Elementary School Grades K-1 Need 12 points for one hazard and 21 points for two hazards. Potential Hazards Greatest Hazard: Crossing two lanes at stop sign (no crossing guard) Second Hazard: Walking along Ringgold Street (inadequate shoulders) Potential Hazard I Crossing two lanes at stop sign First Hazard Potential Hazard II Ringgold Street 919 feet Low Traffic volume Second Hazard Speed limit under 40 MPH Total points for two hazards 1 point 5 points 12 points No pupils attending Woodside Elementary School qualify for transportation on the basis of hazards.

IV. Oakside Elementary School Grades 2 3 Need 12 points for one hazard and 21 points for two hazards. Potential Hazards Greatest Hazard: walking along Decatur Avenue (inadequate shoulders). Second Hazard: Crossing two lanes at stop sign. Potential Hazard I Decatur Avenue 1109 feet First Hazard Potential Hazard II Crossing two lanes at stop sign Second Hazard Speed limit under 40 MPH Total points for two hazards 1 No pupils attending Oakside Elementary School qualify for transportation on the basis of hazards. V. Hillcrest Elementary School Grades 4 5 Need 12 points for one hazard and 21 points for two hazards. Potential Hazards Greatest Hazard: walking along Howard Street (inadequate shoulders). Second Hazard: Crossing two lanes at stop sign.

Potential Hazard I Howard Street 950 feet First Hazard Potential Hazard II Crossing two lanes at stop sign Second Hazard Speed limit under 40 MPH Total points for two hazards 1 No pupils attending Hillcrest Elementary School qualify for transportation on the basis of hazards. VI. Uriah Hill Pre-K School Only pre-kindergarten pupils attend Uriah Hill Elementary School. Neither State Law nor district policy requires transportation for Pre-K pupils and the Child Safety Zone Law applies only for pupils in grades K 12. Never-the-less the following analysis would apply if the district decided to use the Uriah Hill School for pupils in Grades K 6 or if a change in State Laws and district policy included pre-k transportation. Need 12 points for one hazard and 21 points for two hazards. Potential Hazard I Crossing two lanes (Pemart Avenue) Speed limit under 40 MPH First Hazard

Potential Hazard I Walking along Brandt Avenue or other avenues with no sidewalk and with inadequate shoulders 581 ft. Speed less than 40 MPH Second Hazard Total points for two hazards 2 points 5 points 12 points No K 6 elementary pupils who attend Uriah Hill School qualify for transportation on the basis of hazard. VII. Peekskill Middle School Pupils in grades 6 8 walk to school protected by crossing guards, stop lights, stop signs and sidewalks in the vicinity of the school. Pupils who cross the four lanes of Route 6 are protected by stop lights with pedestrian controls. The greatest single hazard for middle school children is posed by crossing the four lanes of Route 6 between a housing complex and a shopping center. The following score is provided for the intersection. Crossing four lanes with stop light and pedestrian signals Crossing heavy traffic Speed limit under 40 MPH Total points 5 points 9 points The roads of the housing complex are private roads according to the April 2009 street maps of the city and do not generate any points towards second hazards. The Hazards for the elementary schools could apply for the some middle school pupils for a maximum of seven points for one hazard and fourteen points for two hazards. No middle school pupil qualifies for transportation on the basis of hazards. City school districts are not required to provide transportation based on distance from school. The Peekskill City School District does not provide transportation for pupils in Grades 6 12 unless transportation is required due to a handicapping condition.

VIII. Peekskill High School The observations made for the Middle School also apply for the high school pupils. Since the qualifying point for grades 9 12 increase to fifteen points for one hazard and twenty-seven for two hazards, no high school pupils qualify for transportation on the basis of hazards. IX. Conclusion Highway traffic hazards that do not calculate the presence of a child safety zone may require parents to make safe arrangements for pupils to and from school. For the most, the City of Peekskill has mitigated traffic hazards for children who walk to and from school. Never-the-less there are dangerous situations such as Howard Street (inadequate shoulders, no sidewalks in parts, narrow road and steep downhill) that the consultant and the district transportation supervisor agree that pupils should not walk along; but do not qualify for transportation on the basis of hazards as mentioned above. It is the responsibility of parents to provide safe transportation in those situations; where school bus transportation is not provided due to distance from school or qualifying hazard.

Appendix A Section 3635-b Child Safety Zone Legislation 1992 As amended in 1992, 1999, 2000, 2002 and 2004.