Big Game Allocation Policy Sub-Committee Recommendations to AGPAC

Similar documents
GENERAL HUNTING REGULATIONS

GENERAL HUNTING REGULATIONS

NEWS RELEASE. Harvest allocation ensures certainty for hunting sector

ALBERTA FISH & GAME ASSOCIATION 2015 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING PASSED RESOLUTIONS FEBRUARY 21, 2015

Teton County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, For the Wyoming Wildlife Federation. David T. Taylor & Thomas Foulke

COUNTY ADVISORY BOARD TO MANAGE WILDLIFE 2019 BIG GAME SEASONS RECOMMENDATIONS

Fremont County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, 2015

Carbon County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, 2015

Big Game Season Structure, Background and Context

BIG GAME SEASON STRUCTURE

GENERAL RESOLUTION NUMBER G

Prairie WMUs (100 Series & 732)

2019 Big Game Tag Application Seminar. Nevada Department of Wildlife

Pershing County Advisory Board to Manage Wildlife

ALTERNATIVE DEER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR GAME MANAGEMENT UNITS. 12A, 12B, 13A, 13B, 16A, 45A, 45B, 45C, and White-tailed Deer Units

NORTH DAKOTA STATE REPORT June 2016

CARSON CITY ADVISORY BOARD TO MANAGE WILDLIFE PUBLIC NOTICE

DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE Operations Division 6980 Sierra Center Parkway, Ste. 120 Reno, Nevada (775) Fax (775)

ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT GUIDELINES FOR THE AND HUNTING SEASONS

ONLINE TAGS Call to have online tags mailed to you

HUNTING LICENSING REGULATION 8/99

Cariboo-Chilcotin (Region 5) Mule Deer: Frequently Asked Questions

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE HARVEST MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES FOR HUNTING SEASONS

PROCEDURE MANUAL of 6. Moose Harvest Management. This Procedure Replaces: None

Glenn Bunch, Chairman, Members: Billie Williams Jr., Johnny Peterson, Wayne Larson, Darren Hamrey Marlene Bunch, Recording Secretary

April Nisga a Fisheries & Wildlife Department

IN PROGRESS BIG GAME HARVEST REPORTS FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH Energy and Resource Development

Acquisition & Protection

Splitting seasons into multiple, shorter ones is preferable to long, crowded seasons.

FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT

Alberta Conservation Association 2016/17 Project Summary Report. Primary ACA staff on project: Stefanie Fenson, Jeff Forsyth and Jon Van Dijk

The Intended Consequences of Wildlife Allocations in British Columbia

Métis Harvesting in Alberta July 2007 Updated June 2010

HUNTING DRAWS Alberta. ONLINE TAGS Call to have online tags mailed to you

BIG GAME SEASON STUCTURE ALTERNATIVES

A SURVEY ON MOOSE MANAGEMENT IN CENTRAL ONTARIO

Alberta Conservation Association 2016/17 Project Summary Report

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Saskatchewan Resident Big Game Draw Overview

Minutes of the Meeting of the Mineral County Advisory Board to Manage Wildlife Monday January 22, 2018 at 6:00 PM

2016 Alberta HUNTING DRAWS. Draw Application Period is May 31 to June 23, 2016 Apply online at albertarelm.com or at a Licence Issuer near you.

DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE Operations Division 6980 Sierra Center Parkway, Ste. 120 Reno, Nevada (775) Fax (775)

Hunt ID: 5023-S-N-495-MDeerAntelope-CO-GCR3AI-R3M-AR3KM-Private Land

Black Bear Quota Recommendations CR 17-13

PROPOSED RULEMAKING GAME COMMISSION

Report Field Description Values

Environmental Appeal Board

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

White-tailed Deer: A Review of the 2010 Provincially Coordinated Hunting Regulation

THE NEVADA BOARD OF WILDLIFE COMMISSIONERS (NBOWC) WILL RECEIVE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THIS MEETING ALONG WITH THE ELKO COUNTY COMMISSION.

PROCEDURE MANUAL. This Procedure Replaces: Previous procedure Harvest Allocation, January 1, 2007.

Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation -- Cayuse, Umatilla, and Walla Walla Tribes

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Introduced in August public meetings

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ON RESIDENT CANADA GOOSE MANAGEMENT Questions and Answers


Hunt ID: CO-ElkMDeerGoatSheepBear-All-ISONGUNN-CGSG-JN

Grizzly Bear Management Plan for the Gwich in Settlement Area

MANAGED LANDS DEER PROGRAM INFORMATION. General Requirements

Kootenay (Region 4) Mule Deer: Frequently Asked Questions

Full summaries of all proposed rule changes, including DMU boundary descriptions, are included in the additional background material.

77th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Enrolled. House Bill 2027 CHAPTER... AN ACT

Report to the Joint Standing Committee on Inland Fisheries and Wildlife

Wildlife, Parks, and Tourism Commission. Notice of Public Hearing

contents 2004 Big Game Statistics

Introduction. Métis Harvesting Context. Policy Parameters. Registration Process. Title: Métis Harvesting in Alberta Policy (2018) Number:

Hunt ID: UT-ElkRElkTElkBDeerDeerMooseAnteGTurkeyBuffaloGoatSheepLionBear-All-NLEVA-HOT- RUCEB

RULE-MAKING NOTICE PARKS AND WILDLIFE COMMISSION MEETING November 16-17, 2017

FIVE YEAR BIG GAME SEASON STRUCTURE DRAFT DATES FOR

contents 2009 Big Game Statistics

NORTH DAKOTA STATE REPORT June 2018

Attachment 2 SPECIAL AUCTION AND RAFFLE TAGS

Environmental Appeal Board

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Feasibility Study on the Reintroduction of Gray Wolves to the Olympic Peninsula

OREGON ADMINISTRATIVE RULES OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE DIVISION 60 GAME MAMMAL AND GAME BIRD CONTROLLED HUNT REGULATIONS

Archery Public Advisory Committee (ARPAC)

Hunt ID: 5083-G-L-4295-MDeerWDeerAntelopeElk-CO-105-IO9WAK-C9OK-A1ND-Trophy Hunts Only

ARE WHITE-TAILED DEER VERMIN?

The Economic Benefits of Hunting and Fishing Activities in Alberta in 2008

DEADLINE TO SUBMIT APPLICATION: MARCH 31 OF EACH YEAR

Nevada Wildlife Commission. Interim: 2014 Big Game Draw Report by Systems Consultants Reno, Nevada November 15, 2014

ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME STAFF COMMENTS INTERIOR REGION REGULATORY PROPOSALS ALASKA BOARD OF GAME MEETING FAIRBANKS, ALASKA FEBRUARY

NORTH DAKOTA STATE REPORT May 25, 2011

Mountain Caribou Recovery Implementation Plan. Predator/Prey Component. Terms of Reference

Peace Region Wildlife Regulations Proposed Changes for Comment ( )

RULES AND REGULATIONS Title 58 RECREATION

IUCN Guidelines for THOPHY HUNTING to promote conservation. Sandro Lovari

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion

Kansas Deer Report Seasons

Nevada Wildlife Commission. Interim: 2015 Big Game Draw Report by Systems Consultants Reno, Nevada November 14, 2015

Stakeholder Activity

Washoe County Advisory Board to Manage Wildlife

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Predator and Furbearer Management. SPECIES: Predatory and Furbearing Mammals

Present: Mitchel McVicars Shane Boren. Absent: Steve Marquez

1) Increase the deer population to 475,000 (mule, 150,000;

WILDLIFE HARVEST STRATEGY IMPROVING BRITISH COLUMBIA S WILDLIFE HARVEST REGULATIONS

Hunt ID: 5044-G-C-5500-ElkMDeerAlopeSheepLionBear-CO-XXX-TCLIF3FEWES- DC7OS-O1MT-Ranching 4 Wildlife

PRESENTATION TO THE BRITISH COLUMBIA LEGISALTIVE STANDING COMMITTEE ON FINANCE September 26, 2013

2010 to Kootenay Elk Management Plan. Ministry of Environment Province of British Columbia Cranbrook, BC July 2010

Minnesota Deer Population Goals. East Central Uplands Goal Block

Transcription:

Big Game Allocation Policy Sub-Committee Recommendations to AGPAC Hunting provides important social, economic and environmental benefits to all Albertans, with approximately 130,000 resident and non-resident hunters participating annually. The allocation of big game hunting opportunity is a significant management consideration, guided by many working policies that have been developed and adapted over time to address evolving needs. In 2015 a review of stakeholder perspectives and existing big game allocation practices indicated the need for a renewed, comprehensive, operational policy, guiding the allocation of Big Game hunting opportunities among resource-user groups. In consultation with the Alberta Game Policy Advisory Council (AGPAC), the Big Game Allocation Policy Sub-committee (APSC) was formed to review existing policies around big game allocation and develop recommendations for renewal. The intent was to collaboratively develop a new policy that fairly accommodates the desires of user groups, is transparent in process and is implemented consistently across Wildlife Management Units. The scope of this policy includes the allocation of big game (black bear, cougar, elk, mule deer, white-tailed deer, moose, pronghorn, bighorn sheep and mountain goat) among resident, non-resident and non-resident alien resource-users. This policy included a review of some aspects of special license draws, but was not intended as a comprehensive review of that system. Alberta s Big Game Allocation Policy is founded on the following principles: Alberta s big game populations belong to all Albertans, are held in trust by the Government of Alberta and are allocated to user groups by law Hunting in accordance with the law is a right in Alberta, under the Hunting Fishing and Trapping Heritage Act Harvesting opportunities will be calculated using the best available knowledge, guided by scientific principles Harvesting opportunities will align with species management objectives to ensure viable populations are maintained over the long term Harvesting opportunities will align with the constitutional rights of Indigenous Peoples to harvest big game for subsistence and cultural purposes Harvesting opportunities will be made available to both resident and nonresident user-groups Harvesting opportunities will be made available to support a viable outfitted hunting industry The big game allocation process will be objective, transparent and consistently applied throughout the province Through a series of deliberations over the fall of 2016 and spring of 2017, the Big Game Allocation Policy Sub-committee submits the following recommendations to the Alberta Game Policy Advisory Council. 1

Respectfully (BGAPSC): Ken Bailey, Jason Caswell, Rob Corrigan, Bob Gruszecki, Dave Kay, Hannah McKenzie, Reg Prostebby, Larry Roy, Ian Stuart, Greg Sutley, Brent Watson. 2

Landowner Special License for Antlered Mule Deer The Landowner Special License was introduced in 1991 to promote positive landowner attitudes toward wildlife and hunters. Landowners who were unsuccessful in specific special license draws, were allowed to obtain a license to hunt that animal on their property. Where landowners have more than one certificate of title, this opportunity can be applied to each through designating another unsuccessful draw applicant. Antlered Mule Deer are included as an eligible animal type for these licenses. Three primary goals were intended for these licenses: 1. To reward landowners for providing land access to other hunters 2. To reward landowners for conserving wildlife habitat on their property 3. To help mitigate losses due to depredation from mule deer Despite this intent, there was no subsequent process to determine the success of this initiative. Anecdotal evidence, however, suggests that the issue of landowner licenses has not been an effective tool in meeting the above objectives: 1. The issue of antlered mule deer landowner licenses may act as a disincentive, effectively restricting access to a landowner s property to reduce competition for their own harvest success. 2. There is no evidence to suggest that wildlife habitat has been conserved as a result of issuance of antlered mule deer landowner licenses 3. The lack of use of antlerless landowner licenses suggests that depredation control by landowners is not a significant concern. Further, the liberal eligibility requirements for antlered mule deer landowner licenses have resulted in significant use, particularly in areas where recreational demand for antlered mule deer is highest. The addition of this license, with an unpredictable annual uptake, has made allocation decisions more challenging and resulted in significant reductions in available quotas for both recreational hunters and the outfitted hunting industry. Provincially, 11% of the available antlered mule deer quota are now allocated to landowner licenses. In over 50% of the 91 WMUs where landowner licenses are issued, these licenses exceed 20% of available quotas. In some WMUs, landowner licenses account for up to 38% of all antlered mule deer licenses sold. Discontinuing the issue of landowner special licenses for antlered mule deer would add over 1200 antlered mule deer back into the special license draw, increasing opportunity for all resident hunters for this high-demand draw choice. This would also reduce the relative number of outfitted hunting allocations significantly, reducing animosity between resident hunters and the outfitted hunting industry. Finally, removing this uncertain and essentially unlimited harvest of antlered mule deer will allow for better management decisions for this important resource. 3

RECOMMENDATION 1: That AGPAC recommend to Alberta Environment and Parks that Antlered Mule Deer no longer be included as an eligible animal for the Landowner Special License 4

Non-Resident Access to Special License Draws Currently, non-resident Canadians are eligible to apply for special license draws in Alberta. Successful applicants can then hunt with an Alberta resident under the authority of a hunter-host license. In 2016, approximately 1000 non-resident Canadian special license draw applications were made, resulting in 300 licenses purchased. Non-resident Aliens are currently prohibited from participating in special license draws in Alberta. Other jurisdictions reserve their special license draw system for residents. Currently, there are approximately 435,000 draw applications made annually in Alberta, resulting in significant wait times for some high-demand draw choices. Over 84% of non-resident special license draw licenses awarded are for Antlered Moose and Antlered Mule Deer. Removing this option from non-resident Canadians will allow these opportunities to be re-allocated to resident and outfitted hunters, potentially reducing draw wait times in some WMUs. The availability of existing partner licenses for Antlered Moose and the creation of new partner licenses for Antlered Mule Deer, Antlered Elk and Trophy Antelope, would allow for continued hunting opportunities for non-resident Canadians for these animal classes, while retaining the Special License Draw system for resident Albertans. RECOMMENDATION 2: That AGPAC recommend to Alberta Environment and Parks that Non-resident Canadians no longer be eligible to apply for Special License Draws. RECOMMENDATION 3: That AGPAC recommend to Alberta Environment and Parks that new partnership licenses be created for Non-resident Canadians for Antlered Mule Deer, Antlered Elk and Trophy Antelope. 5

Create a Special License Draw for Archery seasons Currently, archery seasons in many WMUs are under general license regulations. When the archery harvest in any of these WMUs exceeds 15% of the total allowable harvest in that WMU, archery seasons are relegated to the special license draw. There is concern among stakeholders that the resultant increase of applicants in the special license draw may have an effect on draw wait times. Creating a separate draw for archery special licenses, instead of adding these applicants to the current special license draw, is proposed by stakeholders as a potential solution to increase opportunity for bowhunters, while reducing competition in the special license draw. RECOMMENDATION 4: That AGPAC recommend to Alberta Environment and Parks that dedicated archery Special License Draws be created when general archery harvest in a WMU exceeds 15% of allowable harvest in that WMU 6

Allocate hunting opportunity instead of harvest Currently, Alberta Environment and Parks allocates a portion of the allowable big game harvest to the outfitted hunting industry. This harvest is then converted to OG Allocations using harvest success derived from OG activity reports. The remaining allowable harvest is then converted to recreational special license quotas, using harvest success estimates derived from hunter harvest surveys. Given the differences in harvest success between recreational and outfitted hunters, the proportion of allowable harvest can convert to a much different proportion of hunting opportunity in some WMUs, creating conflict between recreational users and the outfitted hunting industry. Recreational hunters are primarily concerned with hunting opportunity for those animal classes and WMUs having special license draws. The resulting harvest is more relevant to wildlife managers in achieving population management objectives. Basing our allocation of big game on hunting opportunity for those animal classes and WMUs under special license draws is more transparent and easier to defend to Alberta s hunting community RECOMMENDATION 5: That AGPAC recommend to Alberta Environment and Parks that big game be allocated as a proportion of hunting opportunity (OG Allocations Held and Special License Quotas available) instead of harvest, for those animal classes and WMUs on special license draw. For animal classes and WMUs under general license seasons, allocation will continue to be calculated as a proportion of harvest. 7

Standardize the proportion of hunting opportunity allocated to the outfitted hunting industry Currently, Alberta s policy is to allocate up to 10% of the harvest of antlered big game to the outfitted hunting industry and up to 20% of the harvest of Trophy Bighorn and Trophy Antelope. This allocation is not consistently applied across Alberta s WMUs which, as discussed above, results in conflict between recreational hunters and the outfitted hunting community. Standardizing the proportion of hunting opportunity allocated to the outfitted hunting industry provides greater transparency and certainty to both recreational hunters and outfitters, and aligns with our need to support a viable outfitted hunting industry. Outfitted hunting allocations will be reviewed and adjusted at five-year intervals to align with this standard. If significant reductions in harvest are required for conservation purposes, (i.e. a decline of greater than 25% of available special license quotas), outfitted hunting allocations may be reviewed within a 5-year allocation period. Proportions allocated to the outfitted hunting industry shall be as follows: Antlered Moose, Antlered Mule Deer, Antlered Elk and Antlered Whitetail Deer, Trophy Antelope 10% Trophy Bighorn 20% Cougar 20% Black Bear no restriction Commercial hunting opportunities and subsequent available allocations will be reviewed and adjusted at five-year intervals. This will provide professional stability and allow for business planning by Outfitters. RECOMMENDATION 6: That AGPAC recommend to Alberta Environment and Parks that the proportion of big game hunting opportunity allocated to the outfitted hunting industry be standardized across Alberta s Wildlife Management Units as follows: Antlered Moose, Antlered Mule Deer, Antlered Elk and Antlered Whitetail Deer, Trophy Antelope 10% Trophy Bighorn 20% Cougar 20% Black Bear no restriction 8

Standardize the spatial scale at which hunting opportunity is managed Currently, the big game resource is allocated at the WMUlevel for recreational hunters, and at the Species Management Area for the outfitted hunting industry. This has resulted in disproportionate hunting opportunity between recreational hunters and outfitted hunters at the WMU level, causing conflict between these user groups. The Wildlife Management Unit is the scale at which species management objectives are developed and at which hunting activity is most appropriately managed. RECOMMENDATION 7: That AGPAC recommend to Alberta Environment and Parks that the spatial scale at which hunting opportunity is managed be standardized as the Wildlife Management Unit for both recreational and outfitted hunters 9

Phased Implementation Given the potential changes to outfitted hunting allocations resulting from these recommendations (see example spreadsheets for Antlered Mule Deer and Antlered Moose), this policy should be phased in over a five-year period to minimize disruptions to business operations among commercial hunting operations. For the initial five-year review period following the approval of the Big Game Allocation Policy for Alberta, allocations to the outfitted hunting industry will be limited to 150% of the proportions recommended above for each species class at the WMU level, and 100% for the corresponding WMU Series (100s, 200s, 300s, 400s or 500s). For subsequent 5-year review periods, outfitted hunting allocations will not exceed 100% of the recommended proportions by species class in any WMU. During the Five-year Outfitter Allocation Review, new opportunities for Commercial Allocations will be made available where new Recreational Hunting Opportunities exceed 10 Special Licences in any WMU. RECOMMENDATION 8: That AGPAC recommend to Alberta Environment and Parks that once an approved policy is in place, that it be implemented in a phased approach to minimize disruption to affected business operations within the outfitted hunting industry. 10