Length of the Ranch-of-Origin Weaning Period Does Not Affect Post-Receiving Growth or Carcass Merit of Ranch-Direct, Early-Weaned Beef Calves

Similar documents
LENGTH OF THE WEANING PERIOD DOES NOT AFFECT POST-WEANING GROWTH OR HEALTH OF LIGHTWEIGHT SUMMER-WEANED BEEF CALVES

Effects of Creep Feeding on Preweaning and Postweaning Performance Of Angus x Hereford Calves

J. K. Swann, R. H. Pritchard and M. A. Robbins Department of Animal and Range Sciences

Knife Cutting vsbanding with MetaphylaxisTreatment

THE LOUISIANA CALF TO CARCASS PROGRAM

Shipping Healthy Calves 1

Different Health Scenarios to Prepare Calves for Shipping and for Receiving Yearling Cattle 1

Comparison of Feedlot Performance and Carcass Traits of Charolais and Brahman Sired Three-Breed Cross Calves

Contemporary Grouping for Beef Cattle Genetic Evaluation

Certified Health Marketing Programs for Southeastern Calves

H FEEDER CALF PROJECT GUIDELINE

PERFORMANCE OF LIGHT WEIGHT STOCKER CALVES GRAZING SUMMER NATIVE RANGE WITH 25 OR 40% PROTEIN SUPPLEMENTS

Effect of Postweaning Health on Feedlot Performance and Quality Grade

BUCKET CALF MEMBER S MANUAL

STEER 4-H Market Record Book For ages 13 to 19

11 Keeping. 4-H Records

Enclosed is your bottle calf information. Please do not lose this information as you will need this for your fair entries.

I have also enclosed flyers for the Beef Market Outlook and Profitability Meeting on February 18 and the Union County Bull Sale on March 9.

Selecting Beef Bulls

Bucket/Bottle Calf Class

Stephen F. Austin State University Department of Agriculture Bull Development Program

School of Agriculture College of Business and Technology Knoblauch Hall 145 Macomb, IL Phone:

Dr. David Lalman, Professor and Extension Beef Cattle Specialist Oklahoma State University

2019 Braxton County Fairs and Festivals Celebration LIVESTOCK SHOW RULES AND REQUIREMENTS

Information Packet

Winter Nutrition. of Fall-Calving Cows and Calves. in cooperation with. Agricultural Experiment Station Oregon State University, Corvallis

KANSAS 4 -H BUCKET CALF PROJECT

4-H Bucket Calf Project

Development and Management of Bulls 1

Performance Data Reporting and Contemporary Grouping For Beef Cattle Genetic Evaluation

Relationships of Hip Height Measurements with Growth and Carcass Traits of Crossbred and Angus Cattle

4 H Bucket Calf Resource (Source UNL Extension Holt/Boyd County)

Salers 2015 Sire Summary Definitions

CARCASS MERIT NON-CONFORMANCE IN THE OK STEER FEEDOUT PROGRAM. S.L. Northcuttl, H.G. Dolezal2, G.A. Highfill3, F.K. Ray4and C.W. Shearharts.

3) Birth Dates. Bulls born between December 1, 2010 and March 31, 2011 are eligible for the test.

CSA Genetic Evaluation

2018 Rules & Regulations 4-H Market Steer, Dairy Beef, Veal Calves, Dairy Market Steers

School of Agriculture College of Business and Technology Knoblauch Hall 145 Macomb, IL

School of Agriculture College of Business and Technology Knoblauch Hall 145 Macomb, IL Phone:

CALF PERFORMANCE AND COW WEIGHT AND CONDITION FOR COWS SIRED BY HIGH AND LOW MILK EPD ANGUS AND POLLED HEREFORD BULLS

CSA Genetic Evaluation

Table of Contents Basic Calf Care Skill Inventory Calf Raiser Skill Inventory Basic Calf Care Skills

BEEF STUDY GUIDE Livestock Expo Madera County 4-H

A Retrospective Case Study Implicating Foster Calves in a Calf Diarrhea Epidemic

Early Identification of Sick Calves Important to Their Survival and Future Milk Production

Eastern Bison Association. March 7-9, Bison Health Certificates. & Entry Regulations

PA Livestock Evaluation Center. 40 th Anniversary Performance Tested Bull Sale. Friday, March 29, 2013 Noon Sale Arena

EBVS are LESSONS FROM THE ASBP / 2. EBVs of Bulls Entered in the ASBP have provided a reliable Prediction of the Performance of their Progeny

Managing the High Risk Calf. Sheila M. McGuirk, DVM, PhD School of Veterinary Medicine University of WI

AGREEMENT. This is an Agreement between Ridgefield Farm, LLC (RFLLC) and (Bull Buyer) effective this day of, 2016.

Perfect Breed??? In business to produce Beef. Start with the End in sight. 2 Species of Cattle. What Breeds Should you consider?

We wean calves for a variety of reasons beyond it being standard operating procedure on the farm. In years like 2012 during the drought, a lot of

Using higher birth weight bulls

New developments in feeding dairy steers,

The role genetics plays in achieving the perfect MSA Index. Tim Emery - Technical Officer (TBTS)

Calving Season & Cow Efficiency

67th Annual Norfolk Beef Expo Open to the Entire State

OKLAHOMA MARKET REPORT

Friday, October 28th Starting at 7:00 PM at Athens Stockyard

CONFERENCE CALL PROCEDURES

DEPARTMENT 3 - BEEF CATTLE HEALTH RULES FOR BEEF CATTLE

The Economics of Finishing Bison

CHARACTERIZATION OF DIFFERENT BIOLOGICAL TYPES OF STEERS (CYCLE IV): RETAIL PRODUCT YIELDS 1. T. L. Wheeler, M. E. Dikeman, L. V.

OKLAHOMA MARKET REPORT

2018 Calf Challenge Record Book

Alpha Gamma Rho Christmas Classic Saturday, December 5 th

Animal Science Info Series: AS-B-226 The University of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service

-- Results and Discussion

15. NO LATE ENTRIES ALLOWED

Bull Buyer s Guide. $3000 Purchase Price of New Bull Salvage Value of Old Bull (1900 lbs. X 1.10/lb.) $ 910 Net Cost of New Bull

OKLAHOMA MARKET REPORT

SALE ORDER APRIL 1, 2011

Johnson County 4-H Bucket Calf Project Member & Parent Manual

OKLAHOMA MARKET REPORT

Bucket Calf Project (Second Year) Record Book

Montana Rancher Record Notebook

2018 NATIONAL PICTURE JUDGING CONTEST

Illinois 4-H Livestock (Beef, Sheep & Swine) Judging Contest

School of Agriculture College of Business and Technology Knoblauch Hall 145 Macomb, IL

Terms to Know.

Hardin County 4-H Bottle/Bucket Calf Record 4-H er Name: Club: Grade:

BEEF & DAIRY BEEFCircle one or both

An Alternative, Sustainable System of Beef Production in

WEANING BEEF CALVES AT A LATER AGE TO INCREASE PRODUCTION

OKLAHOMA MARKET REPORT

Expected Progeny Difference (EPD) in Beef Cattle

Selecting the Right Replacement. Robert S. Wells, Ph.D., PAS Livestock Consultant

OKLAHOMA MARKET REPORT

OKLAHOMA MARKET REPORT

OKLAHOMA MARKET REPORT

OKLAHOMA MARKET REPORT

EVALUATION OF THE PROGENY OF BEEF SIRES DIFFERING IN GENETIC MERIT

9. Place 15 animals in each lamb, goat, steer and hog class. Place 20 in rabbits GENERAL RULES

OKLAHOMA MARKET REPORT

Ethics & Quality Assurance

DVAuction Video Lots - Bluegrass Stockyards. DVAuction Video Lots - Bluegrass Stockyards

2018 REQUIRED 4-H BEEF PROJECT WEIGH-INS

Northern Verified Producer Participant Manual

Beef Sale Catalogue --- Monday, Oct 22, 2012

OKLAHOMA MARKET REPORT

Transcription:

Length of the Ranch-of-Origin Weaning Period Does Not Affect Post-Receiving Growth or Carcass Merit of Ranch-Direct, Early-Weaned Beef Calves J. W. Bolte, K. C. Olson, J. R. Jaeger, T. B. Schmidt, D. U. Thomson, B. J. White, R. L. Larson, G. A. Milliken, N. A. Sproul, L. A. Pacheco, and M. D. Thomas Introduction Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) is the most economically devastating feedlot disease. Risk factors associated with incidence of BRD include (1) stress associated with maternal separation, (2) stress associated with introduction to an unfamiliar environment, (3) low intake associated with introduction of novel feedstuffs into the animal s diet, (4) exposure to novel pathogens upon transport to a feeding facility and commingling with unfamiliar cattle, and (5) inappropriately administered respiratory disease vaccination programs. Management practices that are collectively referred to as preconditioning are thought to minimize damage to the carcass from the BRD complex. Preconditioning management can reduce the aforementioned risk factors for respiratory disease by (1) using a relatively long ranch-of-origin weaning period following maternal separation, (2) exposing calves to concentrate-type feedstuffs, and (3) producing heightened resistance to respiratory disease-causing organisms through a preweaning vaccination program. The effectiveness of such programs for preserving animal performance is highly touted by certain segments of the beef industry but poorly documented in peerreviewed scientific literature. Ranch-of-origin weaning periods of up to 60 days are suggested for preconditioning beef calves prior to sale; however, optimal length of the ranch-of-origin weaning period has not been determined experimentally. The objective of this study was to test the validity of beef industry assumptions about the appropriate length of ranch-of-origin weaning periods for calves aged 100 to 160 days and weaned during the summer. Experimental Procedures A total of 400 polled, spring-born calves (average body weight (BW) at weaning = 359 ± 69 lb; average birth date = 03/21/2006 ± 19.5 days) were used for this experiment. One set of calves (n = 200) originated from the Kansas State University Cow-Calf Unit. The second set (n = 200) originated from the Agricultural Research Center at Hays (ARCH). Bulls were castrated at least 14 days prior to the study. At each location, calves were blocked by sex and age and assigned randomly to treatments that corresponded to the length of time between separation from their dam and shipping: 60, 45, 30, 15, or 0 days (n = 40/treatment per location). Calf age on the date of maternal separation was 100, 115, 130, 145, and 160 days for calves weaned 60, 45, 30, 15, and 0 days relative to shipping, respectively. The study was initiated on June 15 (75 days before shipping), and the common shipping date for all treatments was August 24 (day 0). 11

All calves were given an initial modified-live vaccination for IBR, BVD, PI3, BRSV, (Bovi-Shield Gold FP, Pfizer Animal Health, Exton, PA) and clostridial disease (Vision 7 with SPUR, Intervet Inc., Millsboro, DE) 2 weeks prior to separation from their dam. They were also individually identified with a color-coded ear tag corresponding to treatment at that time. On the day of maternal separation, all calves were revaccinated for IBR, BVD, PI3, BRSV, and clostridial diseases; they were also treated for internal and external parasites with Dectomax (Pfizer Animal Health) and weighed. Calves were immediately transported a short distance (< 15 miles) to a central home-ranch weaning facility. Calves were maintained in earth-floor pens (4 pens/treatment) at their respective homeranch weaning facilities for a period of days corresponding to their treatment assignment. Calves were fed a common weaning ration during that period that was based on chopped hay, soybean meal, and sorghum grain. It was formulated to achieve an average daily gain (ADG) of 2.0 at a dry-matter intake of 2.5% of BW. Calves were monitored for symptoms of respiratory disease at 7:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. daily during the weaning phase of the experiment. Calves with clinical signs of BRD, as judged by animal caretakers, were removed from home pens and evaluated. Each calf with clinical signs of BRD was weighed, had a rectal temperature measured, and was given a clinical illness score (Table 1). Calves that presented with a clinical illness score greater than 1 and a rectal temperature > 104.0 F were treated according to the schedule described in Table 2. Cattle were evaluated 72 hours posttreatment and re-treated on the basis of observed clinical signs. Calves from all treatments and both origins were individually weighed and shipped from their respective weaning facilities to an auction market located at Russell, KS, on August 24 (day 0). Calves from both locations were commingled with respect to gender, treatment, and body weight and maintained on the premises of the auction market for 14 hours. During that time, calves were moved through the normal processing facilities. The purpose of this step was to simulate pathogen exposure typically encountered by market-ready calves. Calves were shipped directly to the ARCH from the auction market. Upon arrival at the ARCH feedlot, cattle were individually weighed and assigned randomly to a receiving pen on the basis of treatment and gender. Cattle continued to be fed the diet introduced after maternal separation for a period of 56 days after arrival at the ARCH. Feed intake was measured daily. Calves were monitored for symptoms of respiratory disease, and clinical illness was treated as in the home-ranch weaning phase. Body weights were measured at 28-day intervals during the receiving phase. Following the receiving period, replacement heifers were removed, and cattle were placed on a common finishing ration (Table 3). Weights were taken every 60 days throughout the finishing period until slaughter. Cattle were fed to reach an average endpoint of approximately 0.4 in. of backfat at the 12th rib and placed into one of three slaughter groups. Once steers and heifers reached the targeted carcass endpoint, as determined by ultrasound, they were transported approximately 180 miles to a commercial abattoir. At the abattoir, lungs were examined for lesions. After carcasses chilled for 12

approximately 24 hours, they were ribbed and graded. Carcass measurements including 12th rib fat thickness; 12th rib loin eye area; kidney, pelvic, and heart fat; USDA yield grade; USDA quality grade; and marbling score were collected by a trained evaluator blinded to treatment. Results and Discussion Calf BW at feedlot receiving tended to decrease linearly (P=0.06) with successively earlier weaning dates (Figure 1); however, calf BW was similar (P>0.2) among treatments from day 30 after feedlot arrival to harvest. Feed intake (dry-matter basis) during the first 30 days following shipping increased linearly (P<0.01) as the length of the ranch-oforigin weaning period increased; however, dry-matter intake was similar (P>0.3) among treatments from day 30 following shipping to harvest. Daily gain and gain efficiency (G:F) in our study were similar (P=0.4) among treatments during the first 30 days in the feedlot (Figures 2 and 3, respectively). Similarly, calf ADG and G:F were similar (P>0.2) among treatments from day 30 in the feedlot until harvest. Incidence of undifferentiated fever was similar (P=0.18, data not shown) among treatments prior to shipping. In fact, only three calves were treated for respiratory disease, and none expired during the pre-shipment phase of this study. In addition, incidence of undifferentiated fever was similar (P=0.12) among treatments during the first 30 days in the feedlot (Figure 4). Days on feed tended to increase linearly (P=0.06) with successively longer weaning periods (Figure 5). Dressing percentage; fat thickness; hot carcass weight; kidney, pelvic, and heart fat; marbling; loin eye area; and yield grade were similar (P>0.2) among treatments. Liver and lung scores also were similar (P>0.3) among treatments. In general, finishing performance and carcass merit of early-weaned lightweight calves was not improved by ranch-of-origin weaning periods of between 15 and 60 days. Implications Under the conditions of our study, ranch-of-origin weaning periods between 15 and 60 days did not improve post-receiving growth performance, health performance, or carcass merit of early-weaned lightweight calves compared with shipping calves immediately after maternal separation. 13

Table 1. Scoring system used to classify the severity of clinical illness Clinical illness score Description Clinical appearance 1 Normal No abnormalities noted. 2 Slightly ill Mild depression, gaunt, +/- cough 3 Moderate illness Severe depression, labored breathing, ocular/nasal discharge, +/- cough 4 Severe illness Moribund, near death, little response to human approach Table 2. Treatment schedule used to treat calves diagnosed with bovine respiratory disease complex Treat Drug Dose Route of injection 1 st Pull enrofloxacin (Baytril) 5 ml/cwt Subcutaneous 2 nd Pull florfenicol (Nuflor) 6 ml /CWT Subcutaneous 3 rd Pull oxytetracycline (Biomycin 200) 5 ml /CWT Subcutaneous Table 3. Average ingredient and nutritional composition of finishing diet Ingredient Dry-matter basis (%) Rolled milo 59.43 Sorghum silage 25.47 Soybean meal 11.04 Limestone 2.08 Ammonium sulfate 0.42 Nutrient composition % of dry matter CP 15.90 Ca 1.01 P 0.33 NE m, Mcal/kg 1.75 NE g, Mcal/kg 1.13 Diet also included salt, Rumensin 80, Tylan 40, and trace minerals. 14

430 420 Tendency for linear effect (P=0.6) 410 400 BW, lb 390 380 370 360 350 Figure 1. Effect of length of the ranch-of-origin weaning period on body weight (BW) of lightweight calves at feedlot arrival. 3.5 Treatment means are similar (P=0.3) 3.0 2.5 ADG, lb/day 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Figure 2. Effect of length of the ranch-of-origin weaning period on average daily gain (ADG) of lightweight calves during the first 30 days after feedlot arrival. 15

0.18 Treatment means are similar (P=0.4) 0.16 0.14 lb Grain/lb Feed 0.12 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.00 Figure 3. Effect of length of the ranch-of-origin weaning period on growth efficiency of lightweight calves during the first 30 days after feedlot arrival. 16 14 No effect of treatment (P=0.12) 12 % of Cattle Sick 10 8 6 4 2 0 Figure 4. Effect of length of the ranch-of-origin weaning period on incidence of undifferentiated fever in lightweight calves during the first 30 days after feedlot arrival. 16

270 Tendency for linear effect (P=0.06) 260 Days on Feed 250 240 230 220 Figure 5. Effect of length of the ranch-of-origin weaning period on days fed from feedlot receiving to harvest. 17