TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH CENTER

Similar documents
Travel Characteristics on Weekends:

Webinar: Development of a Pedestrian Demand Estimation Tool

How Have Long-Distance Trips Changed Over the Past Decade? Experiences from AL, VT, and CA

City of Davenport CitiBus Public Transportation Study. April 2015

Transportation Trends, Conditions and Issues. Regional Transportation Plan 2030

Aging & Mobility: Stranded Without A Choice

The Case for New Trends in Travel

The Impact of Placemaking Attributes on Home Prices in the Midwest United States

A Framework For Integrating Pedestrians into Travel Demand Models

SoundCast Design Intro

Modal Shift in the Boulder Valley 1990 to 2009

Pedestrian Demand Modeling: Evaluating Pedestrian Risk Exposures

Travel Behavior of Baby Boomers in Suburban Age Restricted Communities

University of Michigan & Urban Land Institute Real Estate Forum. Mary Beth Graebert Michigan State University

Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis

Urban planners have invested a lot of energy in the idea of transit-oriented

Attitude towards Walk/Bike Environments and its Influence on Students Travel Behavior: Evidence from NHTS, 2009

THE 2010 MSP REGION TRAVEL BEHAVIOR INVENTORY (TBI) REPORT HOME INTERVIEW SURVEY. A Summary of Resident Travel in the Twin Cities Region

Project Team. Refined Pedestrian Crossing Toolbox. Problem Statement. Aerial of Study Corridor. Crossing Accommodations and Pedestrian Fatalities

TR NEWS. Public Health and Transportation. Innovation, Intervention, and Improvements NUMBER 299 SEPTEMBER OCTOBER 2015

Project Report for. "Estimating Modal Splits"

Built Environment and Older Adults: Supporting Smooth Transitions Across the Life- Span. Dr. Lawrence Frank, Professor and Bombardier UBC

2016 APS Go! Surveys Summary Results for Oakridge Elementary School

METRO Light Rail: Changing Transit Markets in the Phoenix Metropolitan Area

2016 APS Go! Surveys Summary Results for Arlington Traditional School

Relationship Between Child Pedestrian Accidents and City Planning in Zarqa, Jordan

REGIONAL HOUSEHOLD TRAVEL SURVEY:

SACRAMENTO AREA TRAVEL SURVEY: BEFORE BIKE SHARE

Lisa Quinn Executive Director

Birmingham Connected. Edmund Salt. Transportation Policy Birmingham City Council

2018 Transportation Survey October 17, Prepared by:

EXPLORING THE CHARACTERISTICS OF SHORT TRIPS: IMPLICATIONS FOR WALK MODE CHOICE

Guidelines for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations APPENDIX C TRANSIT STATION ACCESS PLANNING TOOL INSTRUCTIONS

Bike BR. A Tool for Baton Rouge, Louisiana by the City-Parish Planning Commission

Active Travel and Exposure to Air Pollution: Implications for Transportation and Land Use Planning

R&D Initiatives for Sustainable Mobility

Walking in New Zealand May 2013

Author Acknowledgements

THE NEXUS OF LIVABILITY, TRANSIT, AND PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT

Safety culture in professional road transport in Norway and Greece

Flyaway Bus: GIS Analysis on Current and Potential Ridership, Revenue, and Prospective Stations

Ridership Demand Analysis for Palestinian Intercity Public Transport

MIDCOAST MAINE TRANSIT STUDY. In Association with: MORRIS COMMUNICATIONS

Investigating Commute Mode and Route Choice Variability in Jakarta using multi-day GPS Data

2014 Ontario Works Transit Survey: Final Results

Washington County, Oregon

Capital Bikeshare 2011 Member Survey Executive Summary

Rationale. Previous research. Social Network Theory. Main gap 4/13/2011. Main approaches (in offline studies)

Traffic Safety Barriers to Walking and Bicycling Analysis of CA Add-On Responses to the 2009 NHTS

The previous chapters in this plan have established the value of this plan (Chapter 1), the

Cheryl Thole CUTR/NBRTI, Senior Research Associate Tampa, Florida

Walking and Biking in California: Summary of Findings

PASSENGER SURVEY RESULTS

Determining bicycle infrastructure preferences A case study of Dublin

Dowds and Sullivan 1 APPLYING A VEHICLE-MILES OF TRAVEL CALCULATION METHODOLOGY TO A COUNTY-WIDE CALCULATION OF BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN MILES OF TRAVEL

Tulane Transportation Survey

14. Sponsoring Agency Code P.O. Box 5051 Austin, Texas 78763

Geo-coding of the 2012 WMATA Rail Survey. Travel Forecasting Subcommittee January 25, 2012 Clara Reschovsky

Summary of Travel Trends Findings from the 2017 NHTS. Nancy McGuckin, Travel Behavior Analyst Anthony Fucci, Westat

Eric Sundquist Managing Director State Smart Transportation Initiative (SSTI) Urban Sustainability Accelerator

Rider Satisfaction Survey Phoenix Riders 2004

West Dimond Blvd Upgrade Jodhpur Street to Sand Lake Road

Life Transitions and Travel Behaviour Study. Job changes and home moves disrupt established commuting patterns

MODELING THE ACTIVITY BASED TRAVEL PATTERN OF WORKERS OF AN INDIAN METROPOLITAN CITY: CASE STUDY OF KOLKATA

Pocatello Regional Transit Master Transit Plan Draft Recommendations

Fixed Guideway Transit Outcomes on Rents, Jobs, and People and Housing

Planning Guidance in the 2012 AASHTO Bike Guide

Transport attitudes, residential preferences, and urban form effects on cycling and car use.

Travel and Rider Characteristics for Metrobus

Market Factors and Demand Analysis. World Bank

Bike Planner Overview

A GIS APPROACH TO EVALUATE BUS STOP ACCESSIBILITY

Location Matters: Where America Is Moving

SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN: Survey Results and Analysis

o n - m o t o r i z e d transportation is an overlooked element that can greatly enhance the overall quality of life for the community s residents.

Safe Routes to School Program in California: An Update

Webinar: The Association Between Light Rail Transit, Streetcars and Bus Rapid Transit on Jobs, People and Rents

Accessibility, mobility and social exclusion

Rolling Out Measures of Non-Motorized Accessibility: What Can We Now Say? Kevin J. Krizek University of Colorado

1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey

Rerouting Mode Choice Models: How Including Realistic Route Options Can Help Us Understand Decisions to Walk or Bike

Walking New Zealand Household Travel Survey September 2015

Travel Patterns and Characteristics

Free Ride Transit System 2014 On Board Passenger Survey

Introduction Overview This document summarizes the Gateway Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit (Gold Line BRT) health impact assessment (HIA) process and reco

Operationalizing Accessibility

THESE DAYS IT S HARD TO MISS the story that Americans spend

Acknowledgements. Ms. Linda Banister Ms. Tracy With Mr. Hassan Shaheen Mr. Scott Johnston

21/02/2018. How Far is it Acceptable to Walk? Introduction. How Far is it Acceptable to Walk?

Society for Behavioral Medicine, New Orleans, LA. April 12, 2012

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis

Analysis of the Interrelationship Among Traffic Flow Conditions, Driving Behavior, and Degree of Driver s Satisfaction on Rural Motorways

COLUMBUS AVENUE NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSPORTATION STUDY

Cyclists gaze behavior in urban space: an eye-tracking experiment on bicycle facilities.

The Limassol SUMP Planning for a better future. Apostolos Bizakis Limassol, May 16, th Cyprus Sustainable Mobility and ITS conference

RIDERSHIP PREDICTION

Integrated Pedestrian Simulation in VISSIM

Parent Survey Report: One School in One Data Collection Period

Exhibit B: Proposed amendments to the Transportation Element of the Oakland Comprehensive Plan

Bike Share Social Equity and Inclusion Target Neighborhoods

Transcription:

The 2009 NHTS Vermont Uses of the Add-On Data for ing and Research in Vermont James Sullivan, M.S., P.E. Research Analyst TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH CENTER

Research Sponsors Research Collaborators Brian Lee, Ph.D., Assistant Professor Justine Sears, Research Specialist Lisa Aultman-Hall, Ph. D., Professor Paul Hines, Ph. D., Assistant Professor

The 2009 NHTS Vermont Spatial Analysis of Electric Vehicle Charging Demand

Over-sampling Vermont: 1. Allocate samples randomly outside of Chittenden County up to 913 (1,041) 2. Over-sample the 2 most rural counties until 1,000 total households is reached (1,188) Resulted in a statewide sampling rate 5x greater than the national average

Over-sampling Chittenden County: 1. Allocate samples randomly up to 350 (317) 2. Over-sample the rural towns until 500 total households is reached (502)

Research Objectives Use Vermont-specific travel behavior information to complete the first comprehensive update of the trip-generation and trip-distribution sub-modules of the statewide travel demand model Evaluate the improvement in the quality and usefulness of the model following the update

Uses of the NHTS Regression Factors for Trip Rate Table Home-Based Trip Rates Regression Equations for Trip Attraction and Non-Home-Based Trip Production Vehicle Occupancies by Purpose Transit Fractions by Purpose Friction-Factor Equations by Purpose for Trip Distribution

Uses of the NHTS Internal Trip Distributions Vehicle Occupancy Rates I E Home- Avg. Trip Length Distributions Based New (min.) % of Trips Existing New Existin Trip Transit Purpose I-I I E I-I I E g New Rates %s Existing New Existing New HBO 1.56 1.74 1.75 1.85 38% 21% 52% 18.6 20.5 34% 35% HBSHOP 1.37 1.74 1.48 1.93 17% 15% 0.4% 20.8 17.4 14% 21% HBW 1.15 1.74 1.13 1.05 30% 9% 6% 21.8 20.9 25% 13% NHB 1.39 1.74 1.51 1.78 13% 55% 42% 14.5 19.1 21% 31% Existing βs New βs HBSHOP HBSHOP HBSHOP HBSHOP Variable NHB HBW (Urban) (Rural) HBO NHB HBW (Urban) (Rural) HBO No. of Households 0.297 1.143 0.817 1.043 Retail Jobs 1.143 4.115 6.660 2.935 5.796 6.693 Manufacturing Jobs 0.668 0.929 Non-Manufacturing 1.722 0.651 1.450 1.179 Government Jobs 2.450 1.302 0.830 1.119 Primary School Jobs 1.485 0.424 University Jobs 1.485 0.146

Uses of the NHTS Internal Trip Distributions Vehicle Occupancy Rates I E Home- Avg. Trip Length Distributions Based New (min.) % of Trips Existing New Existin Trip Transit Purpose I-I I E I-I I E g New Rates %s Existing New Existing New HBO 1.56 1.74 1.75 1.85 38% 21% 52% 18.6 20.5 34% 35% HBSHOP 1.37 1.74 1.48 1.93 17% 15% 0.4% 20.8 17.4 14% 21% HBW 1.15 1.74 1.13 1.05 30% 9% 6% 21.8 20.9 25% 13% NHB 1.39 1.74 1.51 1.78 13% 55% 42% 14.5 19.1 21% 31% Existing βs New βs HBSHOP HBSHOP HBSHOP HBSHOP Variable NHB HBW (Urban) (Rural) HBO NHB HBW (Urban) (Rural) HBO No. of Households 0.297 1.143 0.817 1.043 Retail Jobs 1.143 4.115 6.660 2.935 5.796 6.693 Manufacturing Jobs 0.668 0.929 Non-Manufacturing 1.722 0.651 1.450 1.179 Government Jobs 2.450 1.302 0.830 1.119 Primary School Jobs 1.485 0.424 University Jobs 1.485 0.146

Research Objectives Understanding the interaction between travel demand and electric vehicle charging Research Questions: 1. Who are the ideal candidates for electric vehicle ownership? 2. What are ideal locations for charging stations?

Methods Current distribution from our DMV records can be used as a seed predictor Attach these hybrid vehicle owners to certain spatially-based travel patterns Use characteristics of the households and drivers to attribute travel patterns to all hybrid owners in the state Hybrid Electric Vehicle Owners in Vermont

Use of the NHTS Analyze the variation in home-to-home tour length to characterize total travel by vehicle spatially Hot-Spot Analysis of Home-to- Home Tour Length

Research Objectives Using stated-preference surveys from the AARP to rank community-attributes according to their contribution to livability for seniors Sub-classified the ranks by age (55 to 64 and 65+) and geography (urban and rural) Geographic Class Rural Urban Age Class (years) % Respondents % Respondents 55-64 47 957 53 1,073 65+ 46 1,186 54 1,363

Results suggest a distinction between age classifications and geographic classifications Rank Rural Urban Age 55 to 64 Age 65+ All 1 2 Safe Neighborhood Hospital in the Community Safe Neighborhood Hospital in the Community Safe Neighborhood Hospital in the Community Safe Neighborhood Hospital in the Community Safe Neighborhood Hospital in the Community 3 Housing Variety of Senior Housing Options Housing Variety of Senior Housing Options Variety of Senior Housing Options 4 Variety of Senior Housing Options Maintenance of Streets Variety of Senior Housing Options Place of Worship Housing 5 Place of Worship Housing Maintenance of Streets Housing Place of Worship 6 Shopping Convenient Public Transport Place of Worship Convenient Public Transport Maintenance of Streets 7 Grocery Store Within ½ Mile Place of Worship Shopping Access to Shopping Convenient Public Transport

Results suggest a distinction between age classifications and geographic classifications Rank Rural Urban Age 55 to 64 Age 65+ All 1 2 Safe Neighborhood Hospital in the Community Safe Neighborhood Hospital in the Community Safe Neighborhood Hospital in the Community Safe Neighborhood Hospital in the Community Safe Neighborhood Hospital in the Community 3 Housing Variety of Senior Housing Options Housing Variety of Senior Housing Options Variety of Senior Housing Options 4 Variety of Senior Housing Options Maintenance of Streets Variety of Senior Housing Options Place of Worship Housing 5 Place of Worship Housing Maintenance of Streets Housing Place of Worship 6 Shopping Convenient Public Transport Place of Worship Convenient Public Transport Maintenance of Streets 7 Grocery Store Within ½ Mile Place of Worship Shopping Access to Shopping Convenient Public Transport

Uses of the NHTS To confirm the importance of these classifications: Description Rural Urban Age 55 to 64 Age 65+ All Average no. of trips per week per person 24.7 25.3 27.9 22.5 25.1 Average no. of walk/bike trips per week per person Average no. of transit trips per week per person Average no. of shopping trips per week per person 2.5 1.7 2.7 1.9 2.3 0.4 0.9 0.9 0.6 0.7 12.9 14.1 14.5 13.3 13.8 Average length of shopping trip (miles) 10.9 5.8 8.0 6.7 7.3

Uses of the NHTS To confirm the importance of these classifications: Description Rural Urban Age 55 to 64 Age 65+ All Average no. of trips per week per person 24.7 25.3 27.9 22.5 25.1 Average no. of walk/bike trips per week per person Average no. of transit trips per week per person Average no. of shopping trips per week per person 2.5 1.7 2.7 1.9 2.3 0.4 0.9 0.9 0.6 0.7 12.9 14.1 14.5 13.3 13.8 Average length of shopping trip (miles) 10.9 5.8 8.0 6.7 7.3

Research Objectives Research Questions In what ways do existing transportation and land use patterns in rural communities impact youth in terms of their access to activities in different places (social and physical availability) and mobility (ability to reach destinations)? What forms of rural built environment are more conducive to independent mobility among youth? Which characteristics of these different rural forms have most significant influence on young people s access to activities and destinations?

Research

Uses of the NHTS Identify travel behaviors that will inform the development of a household survey HHs with Youth HHs without Youth Purpose Count Rank Count Rank Home 597 1 1,442 1 Social / recreational 278 2 659 3 Shopping / errands 214 3 823 2 Work 189 5 506 4 Transport someone 196 4 276 5 School / daycare / religious activity 137 6 173 7 Meals 83 7 259 6 Family personal business / obligations 46 8 162 8 Medical / dental services 19 9 77 9 Other reason 10 10 26 10 Don't know 2 11 4 11 Grand Total 1,771 4,407

Uses of the NHTS Identify travel behaviors that will inform the development of a household survey HHs with Youth HHs without Youth Purpose Count Rank Count Rank Home 597 1 1,442 1 Social / recreational 278 2 659 3 Shopping / errands 214 3 823 2 Work 189 5 506 4 Transport someone 196 4 276 5 School / daycare / religious activity 137 6 173 7 Meals 83 7 259 6 Family personal business / obligations 46 8 162 8 Medical / dental services 19 9 77 9 Other reason 10 10 26 10 Don't know 2 11 4 11 Grand Total 1,771 4,407

Child 01 Person 02 Person 01 Uses of the NHTS Household 30963689, Rural, With One Youth Aged 14-18, 3 Drivers, 3 Vehicles; Tuesday 9/23/2008 Time # on Trip Activity 8:15-8:45am 1 Drove veh 02 to Technology Park to attend meeting 4:37-5:05pm 1 Drove veh 02 to Unleash Pet Store to buy goods 5:15-5:40pm 1 Drove veh 02 home 6:30-6:45pm 1 Drove veh 02 to pick up Child 01 at MMU 6:46-7:00pm 2 Drove veh 02 home with Child 01 7:50-8:00am 2 Drove veh 01 to drop off Child 01 at MMU 8:01-8:20am 1 Drove veh 01 to go to work 10:45-10:53am 1 Walked to go to gym/exercise/play sports 1054:11:00am 1 Walked back to work 1:20-1:43pm 1 Walked to go to gym/exercise/play sports 1:44-1:55pm 1 Walked back to work 2:55-3:10pm 1 Drove veh 01 to Chittenden East Sup. Union to attend business meeting 4:40-4:50pm 1 Drove veh 01 home 6:20-6:30pm 1 Drove veh 01 back to Chittenden East Sup. Union to attend business meeting 8:00-8:10pm 1 Drove veh 01 back home 7:50-8:00am 2 Passenger in veh 01 to be dropped off at High School 1:45-2:30pm 1 Passenger in school bus to go to Bellows Free Academy for gym/play sports 5:30-6:15pm 1 Passenger in school bus to go back to High School as student 6:46-7:00om 2 Passenger in veh 02 picked up from school to be driven back home

Child 01 Person 02 Person 01 Uses of the NHTS Household 30963689, Rural, With One Youth Aged 14-18, 3 Drivers, 3 Vehicles; Tuesday 9/23/2008 Time # on Trip Activity 8:15-8:45am 1 Drove veh 02 to Technology Park to attend meeting 4:37-5:05pm 1 Drove veh 02 to Unleash Pet Store to buy goods 5:15-5:40pm 1 Drove veh 02 home 6:30-6:45pm 1 Drove veh 02 to pick up Child 01 at MMU 6:46-7:00pm 2 Drove veh 02 home with Child 01 7:50-8:00am 2 Drove veh 01 to drop off Child 01 at MMU 8:01-8:20am 1 Drove veh 01 to go to work 10:45-10:53am 1 Walked to go to gym/exercise/play sports 1054:11:00am 1 Walked back to work 1:20-1:43pm 1 Walked to go to gym/exercise/play sports 1:44-1:55pm 1 Walked back to work 2:55-3:10pm 1 Drove veh 01 to Chittenden East Sup. Union to attend business meeting 4:40-4:50pm 1 Drove veh 01 home 6:20-6:30pm 1 Drove veh 01 back to Chittenden East Sup. Union to attend business meeting 8:00-8:10pm 1 Drove veh 01 back home 7:50-8:00am 2 Passenger in veh 01 to be dropped off at High School 1:45-2:30pm 1 Passenger in school bus to go to Bellows Free Academy for gym/play sports 5:30-6:15pm 1 Passenger in school bus to go back to High School as student 6:46-7:00om 2 Passenger in veh 02 picked up from school to be driven back home

Thank You Questions?