MAXIMAL DISTANCE THROW IN GIRLS & BOYS SIX TO TWELVE YEARS OLD. Tone Control in Physical Education which was guided by the Professor

Similar documents

Impact of target selection on front kick kinematics in taekwondo pilot study

TEMPORAL ANALYSIS OF THE JAVELIN THROW

Note! In this lab when you measure, round all measurements to the nearest meter!

A Biomechanical Approach to Javelin. Blake Vajgrt. Concordia University. December 5 th, 2012

Rules of Hurdling. Distance Between Hurdles

How Fast Can You Throw?

UNDER 9 PLAYER EVALUATION (fundamental stage)

Implement Form Initial position Translation (also Rotation) Backwards

Table of Contents Topics Slide No.

Injury Prevention for Runners

Helicopter C.E.R. Teacher Pages

Ocean Inter-annual Variability: El Niño and La Niña. How does El Niño influence the oceans and climate patterns?

Coaching the Hurdles

Determination of Differences in Motor Dimensions between Judo and Karate Athletes

Leg Power in Elite Male Fencers: A Comparative Study among the Three Competitive Disciplines

Rugby Fitness Testing Protocols. Order of Testing:

An Investigation: Why Does West Coast Precipitation Vary from Year to Year?

Exploring the relationship between the pressure of the ball and coefficient of restitution.

Efficacy of Static and Dynamic Distance Perception on Kumite Performance in Karate

SEDIMENT BUDGET OF LIDO OF PELLESTRINA (VENICE) Written by Marcello Di Risio Under the supervision of Giorgio Bellotti and Leopoldo Franco

BBS Fall Conference, 16 September Use of modeling & simulation to support the design and analysis of a new dose and regimen finding study

The Science of Golf. Test Lab Toolkit The Swing: Putting. Grades 6-8

GROSS MOTOR MILESTONES

Experimental Investigation of the Aerodynamics of a Modeled Dragonfly Wing Section

Exploring the relationship between the pressure of the ball and coefficient of restitution.

An investigation of kinematic and kinetic variables for the description of prosthetic gait using the ENOCH system

Equation 1: F spring = kx. Where F is the force of the spring, k is the spring constant and x is the displacement of the spring. Equation 2: F = mg

Singapore National Climbing Standards

Formula One Race Strategy

UNDER 9 AND UNDER 12 PLAYER EVALUATION (fundamental and developmental stages)

Ground Forces Impact on Release of Rotational Shot Put Technique

HOW TO HOLD THE SHOT

Half Marathon Training Program

110m Hurdle Theory and Technique

BACHELOR'S DEGREE IN NAUTICAL SCIENCE AND MARITIME TRANSPORT (Syllabus 2010). (Teaching unit Compulsory) 6 Teaching languages: Catalan, Spanish

Common Hitting Faults

Engineering Project Boat Building Challenge

Proposed Paralympic Classification System for Va a Information for National federations and National Paralympic Committees

Sportsmanship Rating Scale in Tennis Competition with Young Players

FÉDÉRATION INTERNATIONALE DE GYMNASTIQUE

AIAA Brush Seal Performance Evaluation. P. F. Crudgington Cross Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Devizes, ENGLAND

03/11/2017. Critical Determinants of Sprint Hurdle Performance. Dr Paul Brice Consultant Biomechanist. Applied Biomechanical Support Track + Field

RF-1. High Knee Marching, No Arms Run Form Drills. Improve running and movement technique

Root Cause Determination of Excessive Hull Vibration On a First-In-Class Tugboat Design By Wylie Moreshead, P.E., Azima DLI

International Technical Rescue Symposium Presented by John McKently

Definitions: Sets/Duration: Frequency/Amplitude: Execution Options: Passive: Static:

THE IMPULSE-STEP IN THE JAVELIN THROW

Performance & Motor Control Characteristics of Functional Skill. Part III: Throwing, Catching & Hitting

Academic Language Project. Based on the Virginia Physical Education Standards of Learning. Academic Language Card Set GRADE FIVE

How Do You Swing? You should be working with new lab partners starting with this lab.

QUICK WARM UP: Thursday 3/9

Challenge Module Score Form

2008 Excellence in Mathematics Contest Team Project B. School Name: Group Members:

Beginner Skier Progression -Class Levels One and Two Never-ever skiers to skiers making advanced wedge turns

Standing javelin. Development Stage: event group development. Outcome of Activity. What-2 Get the Athletes to Do. Equipment.

NHL & NHLPA Future Goals Program Hockey Scholar TM

SQUAW VALLEY FUNITEL

TWO DIMENSIONAL KINEMATICS

KS3 Science Practise Test

CHAPTER III METHODOLOGY

The Glide Shot Put Mitch Crouser Crouser s Elite Athlete

Helicopter & Launcher

Effect of floating bridge vertical motion on vehicle ride comfort and road grip. Dragan Sekulic, Postdoctoral Researcher

Study (s) Degree Center Acad. Period FACULTY OF PHYSICAL SCIENCE AND SPORT FACULTY OF PHYSICAL SCIENCE AND SPORT

ATHLETICS SPORT RULES. Athletics Sport Rules. VERSION: June 2018 Special Olympics, Inc., 2018 All rights reserved

Analysis of energy systems in Greco-Roman and freestyle wrestlers participated in 2015 and 2016 world championships

Skier Evaluation Form

Supplementary Figure S1

A study on the effect of limb length and arm strength on the ball release velocity in cricket

THE EFFECT OF BINDING POSITION ON KINETIC VARIABLES IN ALPINE SKIING

Set. Teach. Prep SHOT PUT MIDDLE SCHOOL ACTIVITY TRACK AND FIELD

THREE DIMENSIONAL KINEMATICS OF THE DIRECT FREE KICK IN SOCCER WHEN OPPOSED BY A DEFENSIVE WALL

Average Runs per inning,

THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE GOALKEEPERS OF THE FRANCE NATIONAL TEAM IN WINNING THE INTERNATIONAL HANDBALL COMPETITIONS

A QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE HIGH RACQUET POSITION BACKHAND DRIVE OF AN ELITE RACQUETBALL PLAYER

H.Dh. AEC PE Scheme Grade 3 Term1 2008

University of Kassel Swim Start Research

THROWING SKILLS RUN JUMP THROW

A Parametric Study of a High Altitude Airship According to MAAT Multibody Advanced Airship for Transport

by Michael Young Human Performance Consulting

DOUBLES CURLING LET S GET PLAYING!

The Grip: Place the shot comfortably on the base of the hand with the thumb down and the four fingers balancing the shot.

Transcript for the BLOSSMS Lesson. An Introduction to the Physics of Sailing

Adapt, include and excel. INCLUSIVE TENNIS TEACHER RESOURCE Activity Cards

EDPH306 Assignment 1 2 Lesson Plans!

Introduction to Handball for Physical Education. Joanna V. Franquelli

Assists. Swim Extension from Deck. Extension with Equipment. Lifeguard University

Chapter 1. Energy

400 m slow and easy, working on your water feel. Alternating Freestyle and

2005 ANNUAL DOE SUPERCONDUCTIVITY PEER REVIEW Transition of LANL Technology to SuperPower

ABOUT THE TEACHING OF THROWING EVENTS

Inclusive Tennis Teacher Resource Activity Cards

Saturday, 15 July 2006 SAA3-3: 15:45-16:15 APPLYING BIOMECHANICS TO THE QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE FOREHAND

Investigation of The Best Ping-Pong Racquet Material

Appendix E Mangaone Stream at Ratanui Hydrological Gauging Station Influence of IPO on Stream Flow

TRIM Queue, Vejle N Denmark. Evaluation report

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PHYSICAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ATHLETES OF SELECTED EVENTS IN TRACK AND FIELD

APPROACH RUN VELOCITIES OF FEMALE POLE VAULTERS

Transcription:

MAXIMAL DISTANCE THROW IN GIRLS & BOYS SIX TO TWELVE YEARS OLD David, Ribera Nebot 1989 This article is a part of the research Evaluation of Segmentary Tone Control in Physical Education which was guided by the Professor Francisco Seirul-lo Vargas and conducted at the National Institute of Physical Education of Barcelona during the 1988-89 course. Acknowledgements to Jorge Delgado Jurado for his collaboration in testing. Original title: El Lanzamiento a Máxima Distancia de 6 a 12 Años. Translated by the author.

INTRODUCTION Evolutional studies of selected motor skills may provide a better understanding of human motor development as well as some relevant clues for improving motor educational programs. A study about the changes of the maximal distance throw in girls and boys, ages 6 to 12, is presented. PERSONS TESTED Girls and boys, ages 6,7,8,9,10,11 and 12, attending the Sports Schools of the National Institute of Physical Education of Barcelona during the 1988-89 course were invited to participate in the research. 10-12 girls and 10-12 boys of each age were tested. TESTS A set of four maximal distance throw tests with a tennis ball (55 grams of weight) were performed by each participant (two trials in each test).

Static with the right arm Test (E-D Test). Static with the left arm Test (E-I Test). Dynamic with the right arm Test (D-D Test). Dynamic with the left arm Test (D-I Test). Development E-D Test: From the two-legged stance position the person must throw with the right arm a tennis ball as far as possible without lifting the feet from the ground during the throw and two seconds after it. E-I Test: The same conditions that were used in the E-D Test, except that the tennis ball must be thrown with the left arm. D-D Test: While running at a personal rhythm without displacement (skipping at the place) the person must throw with the right arm a tennis ball as far as possible and maintain the run for at least two seconds after the throw. D-I Test: The same conditions that were used in the D-D Test, except that the tennis ball must be thrown with the left arm.

Evaluation The result of each test is the distance in meters at which a tennis ball has been thrown. The throw distance is measured by a measure tape from the throw line to the place where the ball first contacts the ground after having been thrown. RESULTS Means and standard deviations were calculated for each age and sex groups using the following variables: static throw, dynamic throw, best static throw, worst static throw, best dynamic throw and worst dynamic throw. It was considered dominant arm the arm with which the person performed the best throw (the longest throw distance) and non-dominant arm the arm with which the person performed the worst throw (the shortest throw distance). Nomenclature of the results for tables and graphs E(DI)= static-right and left arms. D(DI)= dynamic-right and left arms. ED= Static with the right arm test. EI= Static with the left arm test. DD= Dynamic with the right arm test. DI= Dynamic with the left arm test. ME= Best static throw. PE= Worst static throw. MD= Best dynamic throw.

PD= Worst dynamic throw. NIÑOS= Boys. NIÑAS= Girls. ESTATICO+DINAMICO= Static + dynamic. DISTANCIA (M)= Distance (meters). EDAD(AÑOS)= Age (years). GRAFICA 1. LANZAMIENTO A MAXIMA DISTANCIA ESTATICO-DINAMICO (NIÑOS Y NIÑAS)= Graph 1. Static-dynamic maximal distance throw (boys and girls). DOMINANTE= Dominant. NO DOMINANTE= Non-dominant. GRAFICA 2. LANZAMIENTO A MAXIMA DISTANCIA EN NIÑOS (SEGMENTO DOMINANTE Y NO DOMINANTE)= Graph 2. Maximal distance throw in boys (dominant and non-dominant segments or arms). NIÑOS-ESTATICO= Boys-static. NIÑOS-DINAMICO= Boys-dynamic. NIÑAS-ESTATICO= Girls-static. NIÑAS-DINAMICO= Girls-dynamic. DERECHA= Right. IZQUIERDA= Left. GRAFICA 3. LANZAMIENTO A MAXIMA DISTANCIA EN NIÑAS (SEGMENTO DOMINANTE Y NO DOMINANTE)= Graph 3. Maximal distance throw in girls (dominant and non-dominant segments or arms). ESTATICO= Static. DINAMICO= Dynamic. GRAFICA 4. LANZAMIENTO A MAXIMA DISTANCIA NIÑOS-NIÑAS (ESTATICO Y DINAMICO)= Graph 4. Maximal distance throw in boys-girls (static and dynamic).

Gráfico 1 Gráfico 2

Gráfico 3 Gráfico 4

DISCUSSION Eventhough this type of cross-sectional investigations have obvious limitations compared to longitudinal studies, we consider interesting to point out the following conclusions: Boys obtain better results than girls in static and dynamic maximal distance throw. At six and seven years old there are tiny differences; however, from eight to twelve years old the differences become bigger and significant (Graph 1). To a certain extent, it can be said that contrary to girls, boys maximal distance throw dominance is differentiated, especially since eight years old. An argument in support of this approach must be found by analyzing static and dynamic maximal distance throws with the dominant and non-dominant segment (Graphs 2 and 3). It is observed that girls maintain slightly differences between dominant and nondominant segment at all ages whilst boys show significant differences already at six years old which increase with age. It is important to look at raw data, inasmuch as units in graphs 2 and 3 are not equal. Added to this, it is particularly interesting to observe that the dominant segment, in terms of static and dynamic maximal distance throw, is the right arm for both girls and boys (Graphs 2a,2b,3a and 3b).

These results could partially explain a faster and earlier development and maturation of dominance, in addition to, specially for maximal distance throw (basically on the dominant segment), bigger levels of fast strength (which also increase with age) in boys than in girls. Nevertheless, a determinant factor should also be taken into account in order to explain these differences: the different degree of motor skills experiences between girls and boys. Both girls and boys show insignificant differences between maximal distance throw static and maximal distance throw dynamic. There is a parallel evolution with tiny superior values for the static maximal distance throw (Graph 4). Therefore, segmentary tone control capacity makes little influence on this type of maximal distance throw skills. Probably, in precision throws and, to a great extend, in precision-power throws it would exist more significant differences between static and dynamic throw since this type of dynamic throws require a better differential relaxation control or segmentary tone control than static ones.

REFERENCES MEINEL, K. & SCHNABEL, G. (1984). Teoria del Movimento. Roma: Societa Stampa Sportiva. RIBERA NEBOT, D. (1989). Valoración del Control Tónico Segmentario en Educación Física. Memoria de Investigación INEF de Barcelona. Documento INEF Barcelona. SEIRUL-LO VARGAS, F. (1987). Apuntes de Clase de Educación Física de Base. Documento INEF Barcelona.

E(DI) D(DI) 6 A. 7 A. 8 A. 9 A. 10 A. 11 A. 12 A. NIÑOS 6,2 8,225 8,925 11,95 14,975 15,6 18,675 NIÑAS 4,25 7,375 5,975 8,075 8,8 10,775 13,85 GRAFICA 1. LANZAMIENTO A MAXIMA DISTANCIA ESTATICO-DINAMICO (NIÑOS Y NIÑAS) NIÑOS 6 A. 7 A. 8 A. 9 A. 10 A. 11 A. 12 A. DOMINANTE 7,7 11,55 11,6 14,5 19,1 18,85 25,05 NO DOMINANTE 4,65 4,85 6,75 9,4 10,9 11,8 13,8

GRAFICA 2. LANZAMIENTO A MAXIMA DISTANCIA EN NIÑOS (SEGMENTO DOMINANTE Y NO DOMINANTE) NIÑAS 6 A. 7 A. 8 A. 9 A. 10 A. 11 A. 12 A. DOMINANTE 5,05 8,8 7,05 9,85 10,4 12,65 15,35 NO DOMINANTE 3,45 5,9 4,9 6,05 7,2 8,8 12,35

GRAFICA 3. LANZAMIENTO A MAXIMA DISTANCIA EN NIÑAS (SEGMENTO DOMINANTE Y NO DOMINANTE) NIÑAS Y NIÑOS 6 A. 7 A. 8 A. 9 A. 10 A. 11 A. 12 A. ESTATICO 5,825 8 8,125 10,825 12,525 13,9 17,325 DINAMICO 4,625 7,6 6,775 9,2 11,25 12,475 15,2 GRAFICA 4. LANZAMIENTO A MAXIMA DISTANCIA NIÑOS-NIÑAS (ESTATICO Y DINAMICO) NIÑOS-ESTATICO 6 A. 7 A. 8 A. 9 A. 10 A. 11 A. 12 A. DERECHA 8,9 10,7 12,2 16,3 19,1 19,6 25,9

IZQUIERDA 5,1 6,6 7,5 10 11,8 12,8 13,6 A. NIÑOS-DINAMICO 6 A. 7 A. 8 A. 9 A. 10 A. 11 A. 12 A. DERECHA 6,1 11,8 9,8 12,4 18,5 17,9 21,8 IZQUIERDA 4,7 3,8 6,2 9,1 10,5 12,1 13,4 GRAFICAS 2.A. Y 2.B. B. NIÑAS-ESTATICO 6 A. 7 A. 8 A. 9 A. 10 A. 11 A. 12 A. DERECHA 5,2 8,6 6,9 10 11,1 13,2 15,6 IZQUIERDA 4,1 6,1 5,9 7 8,1 10 14,2

A. NIÑAS-DINAMICO 6 A. 7 A. 8 A. 9 A. 10 A. 11 A. 12 A. DERECHA 4,3 8,7 6,2 8,8 9,3 11,1 14,4 IZQUIERDA 3,4 6,1 4,9 6,5 6,7 8,8 11,2 GRAFICAS 3.A. Y 3.B. B.