Fresno Council of Governments Community Workshop. Tuesday, April 25, 2017 Hoover High School Fresno, California

Similar documents
MCTC 2018 RTP SCS and Madera County RIFP Multi-Modal Project Eval Criteria GV13.xlsx

VISION Long Range Plan Update Board Workshop. February 10, 2016

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

Incorporating Health in Regional Transportation Planning

Incorporating Health in Regional Transportation Planning

Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies

Vision Public Workshop: Findings

Tulsa Metropolitan Area LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

WELCOME. City of Greater Sudbury. Transportation Demand Management Plan

Public Consultation Centre

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

MOBILITY RESULTS AREA. Budgeting For Outcomes Council Presentation January 12, 2007

El Paso County 2040 Major Transportation Corridors Plan

City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary

Providing an Efficient and Multi-modal Transportation System

AAMPO Regional Transportation Attitude Survey

Appendix C 3. Bicycle / Pedestrian Planning

Public Information and Participation Comments

Performance Criteria for 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan

WHITE PAPER: TRANSIT SERVICE FOR SOUTH SHAGANAPPI

Dear City Council Members,

2045 Long Range Transportation Plan. Summary of Draft

Regional Transportation Needs Within Southeastern Wisconsin

DKS & WASHINGTON COUNTY Washington County Transportation Survey

2. Context. Existing framework. The context. The challenge. Transport Strategy

National Association of REALTORS National Smart Growth Frequencies

Where We Live and Work Today

Measuring the Distribution and Costs of Congestion. Tim Lomax Texas Transportation Institute

PUBLIC OPINION STRATEGIES

North Coast Corridor:

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

May 12, 2016 Metro Potential Ballot Measure Issue Brief: Local Return

Bike/Multipurpose Trail Study for Glynn County, Georgia MAY 16, 2016

Rhode Island Moving Forward Long-Range Transportation Plan 2040 Municipal Roundtable Providence County

Online Open House Survey Report. December 2016

TRANSIT & NON-MOTORIZED PLAN DRAFT FINAL REPORT Butte County Association of Governments

WILMAPCO Public Opinion Survey Summary of Results

INFRASTRUCTURE: Using the Grid to Create a more Self-Sustaining Downtown. Studio Spring 2013

Community & Transportation Preferences Survey

A Health Impact Assessment (HIA) on a Proposed Road Diet and Re-Striping Project In Spartanburg, SC

Measuring and Communicating Mobility:

Roadways. Roadways III.

Childhood Obesity: A Policy Perspective

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

Public Consultation Centre For. Transportation Master Plan Update. Information Package

York Region Population and Employment Growth

WELCOME Region of Waterloo Transportation Master Plan Update Public Consultation Centre

EVAN GLASS. Montgomery County Council District 5

Chapter 5 Future Transportation

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Executive Summary

CITY OF SIGNAL HILL Cherry Avenue Signal Hill, CA

2015 Florida Main Street Annual Conference. Complete Streets Equal Stronger Main Streets

Eliminate on-street parking where it will allow for a dedicated bus only lane %

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS of The Draft 2015 CLRP

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary

RESTRICTED ROADS (20 MPH SPEED LIMIT) (SCOTLAND) BILL. 1. Is reducing the speed limit to 20mph the best way of achieving the aims of the Bill?

Pocatello Regional Transit Master Transit Plan Draft Recommendations

AMATS Complete Streets Policy

VISION. Introduction WHAT S INSIDE. One Region, Focusing on Our Future

City of Hamilton s Transportation Master Plan (TMP) Public Consultation 3 December 2015

I-105 Corridor Sustainability Study (CSS)

Merced County Association of Governments: Voter Survey

General Plan Circulation Element Update Scoping Meeting April 16, 2014 Santa Ana Senior Center, 424 W. 3rd Street, Santa Ana, CA 92701

Durham Region Long Term Transit Strategy

Typical Rush Hour Commute. PennyforTransportation.com

Transportation Issues Poll for New York City

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

Governor s Transportation Vision Panel

Sustainable Transportation Initiatives and Plans in Caledon

Public Transportation and Bicycle & Pedestrian Stakeholder Webinar. April 11, :30 PM

Mobileye Shield+ Collision Avoidance System Pilot Program

Prioritizing Transportation Policy and Funding for Active Transportation, Safety, Equity and Health

STUDY ADVISORY COMMITTEE. October 8, 2015

ROUTES 55 / 42 / 676 BUS RAPID TRANSIT LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE

2011 Countywide Attitudinal and Awareness Survey Results

WEST AND SOUTH WEST RING ROAD DOWNSTREAM TRAFFIC IMPACTS

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

BUILDING THE CASE FOR TRAVEL OPTIONS IN WASHING TON COUNTY. Image: Steve Morgan. Image: Steve Morgan

Chapter 7. Transportation. Transportation Road Network Plan Transit Cyclists Pedestrians Multi-Use and Equestrian Trails

ITEM 3 ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION NO

Health and Transportation: Integrated Transport and Health Impact Model in the Nashville Region. Leslie Meehan, AICP June 2015

Circulation in Elk Grove includes: Motor vehicles, including cars and trucks

Regional Bicycle Barriers Study

Preliminary Transportation Analysis

Develop a Multi-Modal Transportation Strategy (Theme 6)

Traffic Congestion in Houston. Presented by Bill King

Spring 2011 Community-Based Outreach Results

I-35W Solutions Alliance Project Update July 13, 2017

Coolest Cities Results Summary

Better Market Street Project Update. Urban Forestry Council September 17, 2014

DANGEROUS BY DESIGN MARYLAND. Solving the Epidemic of Preventable Pedestrian Deaths (And Making Great Neighborhoods)

Standing Committee on Policy and Strategic Priorities

Access BART: TOD and Improved Connections. October 29, 2008

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

Light Rail Transit in North Central Calgary Open House and Workshop Summary. Summer 2013

Improving Mobility Without Building More Lanes

Goal 3: Foster an environment of partnerships and collaboration to connect our communities and regions to one another.

Chapter 2. Bellingham Bicycle Master Plan Chapter 2: Policies and Actions

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Sept. 26, 2011

Transcription:

Fresno Council of Governments Community Workshop Tuesday, April 25, 2017 Hoover High School Fresno, California

Who is Fresno COG? Fresno Council of Governments Association of local governments-the 15 cities and the County of Fresno are members One of 38 in California and 500+ nationwide Formed in 1967 2

Who is Fresno COG? Funding comes from local, state and federal sources The Fresno COG Policy Board consists of the Mayors of the 15 incorporated cities in Fresno County and the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors 3

What does Fresno COG do? Planning: Regional plans for transportation related activities (5-25 years into the future) Freeways, roadways, airports, rail, biking and walking, buses and air quality Money for transportation projects and programs Computer traffic forecast computer program with all of the transportation in Fresno County that tests how/where all the traffic will go now and in the future 4

What does Fresno COG do? Administrate programs: Measure C Carpool Program Measure C Vanpool Program Measure C Senior Taxi Scrip 75% off Taxi Rides for seniors 70 years old or older Freeway Service Patrol- Free towing for cars that break down on the freeway during morning and evening hours Bike maps of all the bike lanes, routes and trails in Fresno and Clovis 5

Now tell us about you... 6

What you need to know about voting with clickers 1. Select one answer per question slide 2. If you want to change your answer, just vote again before voting on a slide is closed 3. Turn in the clicker before you leave! They won t operate anything else you own. 7

What is your gender? 1. Male/Masculino 2. Female/Femenin o 49% 51% 1 2 8

How old are you? 1. 17 or younger (o menor) 1% 2. 18-34 3. 35-54 4. 55-70 16% 19% 30% 5. 71 or older (o mayor) 33% 9

Where do you live? 1. Fresno or Clovis 2. Foothill/Mountain Areas (Faldas/Montañas) 3. East of highway 99-not Fresno or Clovis Este del 99 4. West of highway 99-not Fresno/ Oeste del 99 5. Outside of Fresno County/Afuera del Condado de Fresno 81% 12% 4% 3% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 10

What is your ethnic background? 1. African American 2. American Indian 3. Asian/Asiático 4. Hispanic or Latino 5. Pacific Islander/ Islas Pacíficas 6. White/Blanco 7. Other/Otro 11% 51% 36% 0% 0% 0% 3% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 11

What is the last grade you 1. Some school/algo completed in school? 2. High school graduate preparatoria 3. Some college Algo de universidad 4. Vocational Training Capacitación vocacional 5. Bachelor s degree Licenciatura 6. Graduate or professional degree/título universitario o 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 profesional 12 4% 13% 20% 12% 27% 23% 1%

Who/what are you representing at this workshop? 1. Community member/family representative/miembro comunitario 2. Organization or club member/miembro de organización 3. Government employee/empleado de gobierno 4. Elected official/funcionario electo 31% 4%3%3% 60% 5. Other 1 2 3 4 5 13

Regional Transportation Plans What are they? The 25 year transportation vision of our community Updated every 4 years Required by State and Federal Laws 14

Regional Transportation Plans How are they built? Fresno COG figures out what money will be available over 25 years The cities and county send projects to Fresno COG Fresno COG plans how and when to fund the projects with available money Plan includes transit, bike and sidewalk projects, roads, freeways, 15

What does it mean to me? Guides how and where you will travel Guides how your groceries and gas will get to stores and gas stations, etc. Encourages land use that works with the transportation system-easier to get to work, stores, doctors, etc. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 16

What does it mean to me? Promotes and secures safe and reliable travel for you Creates a transportation system that can be paid for and taken care of over time Improves the air you breathe 17

What is a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS)? It ties transportation with housing, jobs and services, and aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions It provides other benefits such improved air quality, a healthier environment, more housing and transportation choices, farmland preservation, etc. 18

What is the Greenhouse Gas Connection? Gases that heat up the atmosphere are called greenhouse gases Transportation causes 37% of those greenhouse gas emissions Greenhouse gas emissions contribute to climate change The Sustainable Communities Strategy ties transportation with land use and aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions 19

Land use & Transportation 20

1 miles 10 miles 21

How do we develop an SCS? 1. Determine community values - values are things that are important to us 2. Set Goals Based on values 22

How do we develop an SCS? Look at alternatives What choices do we have? What could our community look like in the future? An alternative is called a scenario The SCS will include four scenarios One scenario will eventually be chosen as the preferred scenario 23

How do we develop an SCS Plan? Make choices based on values (strategies) What s important to us today? Where do we want to be tomorrow? How can we get there? Make choices based on outcomes (performance measures) Outcomes are determined by research They will be used to pick the preferred scenario 24

Let s Talk Values! We want to know your values! They will help us develop the four scenarios We want you to give us your thoughts regarding the type of community you would like to live in 25

What should we spend money on? 1. Repair streets & roads First choice: 2. Add more lanes on the roads 3. Improve bus service 4. Add & repair bike lanes, trails and sidewalks 5. Reduce roadway collisions 6. Improve air quality & address climate change 7. Reduce congestion 8. Serve disadvantaged & sensitive populations 19% 3% 7% 13% 26% 20% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 6% 7% 26

What should we spend money on? 1. Repair streets & roads Second choice: 2. Add more lanes on the roads 3. Improve bus service 4. Add & repair bike lanes, trails and sidewalks 5. Reduce roadway collisions 6. Improve air quality & address climate change 7. Reduce congestion 8. Serve disadvantaged & sensitive populations 23% 5% 6% 23% 21% 14% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 2% 8% 27

What should we spend money on? 1. Repair streets & roads Third choice: 2. Add more lanes on the roads 3. Improve bus service 4. Add & repair bike lanes, trails and sidewalks 5. Reduce roadway collisions 6. Improve air quality & address climate change 7. Reduce congestion 8. Serve disadvantaged & sensitive populations 12% 4% 24% 16% 19% 10% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 6% 9% 28

Let s Talk Strategy! A strategy involves a choice between alternative paths If two things are important, but you cannot do both which would you choose? For each of the following choices, you can favor one over the other, or remain neutral 29

Choice #1: Housing Preference In Fresno County, people have historically shown a preference for single-family homes Continuing this trend would mean that homes and jobs/services would be farther apart, meaning more vehicle travel An alternative strategy is mixed-used development, where housing and jobs/services are close to each other, reducing vehicle travel 30

Should we actively try to change historical housing trends and move toward mixed-use development? 1. Absolutely 2. Yes 3. No preference 4. No 5. Definitely not 41% 27% 9% 15% 8% 1 2 3 4 5 31

Choice #2: Housing Density In the Fresno County region, people have historically shown a preference for having large homes on large lots Continuing this trend would mean more new land consumed, more long-distance travel, and more pollution Reversing the trend would mean smaller lots and homes closer together, but would also preserve farmland and reduce pollution 32

Should we favor higher-density housing for new development? 1. Absolutely 33% 31% 2. Yes 3. No preference 4. No 5. Definitely not 10% 15% 11% 1 2 3 4 5 33

Choice #3: Priority Areas New growth near urban transit services would maximize Fresno s investment in bus rapid transit, and would be a highly effective strategy at reducing overall vehicle travel New growth in smaller, rural cities and communities would serve traditionally underserved populations, and could make rural residents less dependent on traveling to the metro area for services. 34

Should we prioritize development in certain areas? If so, where? 1. Strongly prioritize small, rural communities 2. Moderately prioritize small, rural communities 3. Balance investment between urban and rural areas 4. Moderately prioritize development near urban transit 5. Strongly prioritize development near urban transit 32% 22% 17% 17% 12% 1 2 3 4 5 35

Choice #4: Transit Strategy Improving transit service might be a part of one or more of the SCS scenarios. If additional investment is put into public transit, how should that investment be used? Adding more transit stops would serve more people, and make transit more accessible Adding more buses (reducing the amount of time spent waiting for the next bus) would make transit more reliable 36

How should transit investments be used? 1. Strongly prioritize accessibility (adding more stops) 2. Moderately prioritize accessibility 3. Balance investment between accessibility and reliability 4. Moderately prioritize reliability (faster headways) 5. Strongly prioritize reliability 39% 31% 18% 8% 4% 1 2 3 4 5 37

Let s Talk Scenarios! Lastly, we would like to get your opinion on the four scenarios that have been proposed by our advisory committee. Today, you will not be ranking the scenarios against each other, or picking a favorite scenario you will simply rate how you feel about each scenario on its own. 38

Let s Talk Scenarios! When rating a scenario, consider: The scenario s vision (what the future might look like) The scenario s strategies (how it proposes getting there) The scenario s goal (what it s trying to accomplish) 39

Scenario A: Invest in Existing Communities Vision: Small cities and rural communities that are robust and thriving Strategy: Encourage growth in existing small cities and rural communities Goal: Reduce vehicle travel from rural areas into the urban core 40

Scenario A: Invest in Existing Communities Priority Investments: Encourage mixed-use development Maintain streets and roads Encourage development in small communities Moderate Investments: Maintain and improve transit services Promote ridesharing Operational improvements (e.g. signal coordination) 41

How would you rate Scenario A: Invest in Existing Communities? 1. Strongly support 2. Moderately support 3. No preference 4. Moderately oppose 5. Strongly oppose 34% 39% 16% 7% 3% 1 2 3 4 5 42

Scenario B: Transit-Oriented Development Vision: Maximum use of public transit investments Strategy: Encourage development near high-frequency urban transit stops Goal: Increase transit ridership, decrease vehicle travel, and minimize greenhouse gas emissions 43

Scenario B: Transit-Oriented Development Priority Investments: Encourage mixed-use development Maintain streets and roads Encourage development near urban transit Moderate Investments: Maintain and improve bike/pedestrian assets Promote ridesharing Operational improvements (e.g. signal coordination) 44

How would you rate Scenario B: Transit-Oriented Development? 1. Strongly support 2. Moderately support 3. No preference 4. Moderately oppose 5. Strongly oppose 44% 36% 12% 5% 3% 1 2 3 4 5 45

Scenario C: Maintain Existing Transportation Facilities Vision: A transportation system that is efficient and in good repair Strategy: Invest in maintenance, repair, and enhancement of existing streets and roads Goal: Minimize vehicle delay and congestion, cutting down on emission-heavy idle time on the roads 46

Scenario C: Maintain Existing Transportation Facilities Priority Investments: Maintain streets and roads Operational improvements (e.g. signal coordination) Maintain and improve bike/pedestrian assets Encourage mixed-use development Moderate Investments: Expand the roads (add more lanes) Encourage development near urban transit Promote ridesharing 47

How would you rate Scenario C: Maintaining Existing Transportation Facilities? 1. Strongly support 2. Moderately support 3. No preference 4. Moderately oppose 5. Strongly oppose 46% 26% 9% 10% 9% 1 2 3 4 548

Scenario D: Active Transportation Vision: Clean air and healthy, active communities Strategy: Invest in bike and pedestrian projects that encourage people to use their cars less. Goal: Increase active transportation and transit services, reduce pollution, and improve community health 49

Scenario D: Active Transportation Priority Investments: Maintain and improve bike/ pedestrian assets, especially in health-burdened areas Encourage development in small communities Encourage mixed-use development Moderate Investments: Operational improvements (e.g. signal coordination) Increase transit reliability and accessibility Promote ridesharing 50

How would you rate Scenario D: Active Transportation? 1. Strongly support 69% 2. Moderately support 3. No preference 4. Moderately oppose 19% 5. Strongly oppose 7% 4% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 51

Participation Timeline April 2017: Community Workshops today! June 2017: Public Workshops across the region regarding transportation projects October/November 2017: Public workshops to view and vote on the Draft Greenhouse Gas Reduction Scenarios March 2017: Draft plans released for public review and comment June 2017: Final adoption of plans 52

What to do next 1. Turn in your clicker for a cookie! 2. Visit the Scenario Stations set up around the room 3. View the Scenario strategies 4. Ask questions 5. Fill out a comment form and turn it in today 53

Fresno Council of Governments www.fresnocog.org 559-233-4148 54