HIGH STREET & ROYAL AVENUE TRAFFIC SURVEY

Similar documents
Police Recorded Injury Road Traffic Collisions and Casualties Northern Ireland. Detailed Trends Report 2015

May Canal Cordon Report 2017

WELCOME Mission-Geneva Transportation Study

95 Express Annual Operations Report: Fiscal Year

Traffic Safety Plan Traffic Safety Plan 2015

COLLISION STATISTICS May Engineering Services Box 5008, th Avenue Red Deer, AB T4N 3T4

Police Recorded Injury Road Traffic Collisions and Casualties Northern Ireland

Published 24th June 2016 Published 31 st August Police Service of Northern Ireland Police Service of Northern Ireland

MEMORANDUM. City Constituents. Leilani Schwarcz, Vision Zero Surveillance Epidemiologist, SFDPH

SHOTLEY BRIDGE VILLAGE TRUST

Analysis of the Red Light Camera Program in Garden Grove, CA By Jay Beeber, Executive Director, Safer Streets L.A., Member ITE

PRELIMINARY DRAFT FIRST AMENDMENT TO VISION 2050: A REGIONAL LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN

CITY OF HAMILTON PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Transportation Planning and Parking Division

KC Scout Kansas City s Bi-State Transportation Management Center

Speed Limit Policy Isle of Wight Council

St. Patrick s Day 2018 Business Feedback. St. Patrick s Day

No-car lanes in Tyneside results from modelling and stakeholder analysis

Report on trends in mode share of vehicles and people crossing the Canal Cordon to 2013

Montgomery County Pedestrian Safety. Seneca Valley High School PTSA November 20, 2012

Enforcement of Bus Lane and Moving Traffic Contraventions in Cardiff. Councillor Briefing Pack

The Cabinet Member for Highways & Streetscene. Aurang Zeb - Head of Highways & Transport

Encouraging Taxi Drivers to Behave: Grafton Bridge Taxi and Bus Lane Trial. Rob Douglas-Jones Tim Segedin, Edin Ltd.

Road safety in Greece Ministry of Infrastructure, Transport and Networks Dr Evi Blana Secretariat of Bi-ministerial Committee of Road Safety

A review of 2015 fatal collision statistics as of 31 December 2015

IRedwood i. rmmbr 2. Uti. Page 18. August Judge of the Superior Court Hall of Justice 400 County

20mph in Edinburgh. Phil Noble

motor vehicle collisions

2014 QUICK FACTS ILLINOIS CRASH INFORMATION. Illinois Emergency Medical Services for Children February 2016 Edition

2012 QUICK FACTS ILLINOIS CRASH INFORMATION. Illinois Emergency Medical Services for Children September 2014 Edition

Cycle journeys on the South-West City Way: a descriptive analysis. Karen McPherson. Glasgow Centre for Population Health

MILTON ROAD ~ MITCHAM'S CORNER PARAMICS MODEL INITIAL OPTION TESTING

Traffic Safety Basic Facts 2011

Appendix 12 Parking on footways and verges

Hambleton District (Area 2)

Cycle journeys on the Anderston-Argyle Street footbridge: a descriptive analysis. Karen McPherson. Glasgow Centre for Population Health

Part 1 Road Transport

2 Hawken Dr, St Lucia QLD 4067

The Corporation of the City of Sarnia. School Crossing Guard Warrant Policy

WEST HATCH HIGH SCHOOL THE BEST THAT I CAN BE. School Travel Plan

M9/A90/M90 Edinburgh to Fraserburgh Trunk Road. A90 Tealing. Moving Cursor Programme Junction Study

MTCF. Michigan Traffic Crash Facts FACT SHEETS

IESL Annual Sessions 21 st October 2003

November 2, Government takes on the challenge of improving traffic safety

Traffic Safety Basic Facts 2012

Captain Cook Elementary. Action Details Start Complete Notes

ENCOURAGING TAXI DRIVERS TO BEHAVE: GRAFTON BRIDGE TAXI AND BUS LANE TRIAL

Merseyside Road Safety Partnership s Annual Road Traffic Casualties Report 2015

MEETING DATE: DECEMBER 9, SUBJECT: Use Of Cameras To Enforce Transit Lanes RECOMMENDATIONS. It is recommended that the Commission:

Report to Cabinet. 18 May 2016

SECTION 1. The current state of global road safety

BELFAST RAPID TRANSIT. Ciarán de Búrca Director, Transport Projects Division Department for Regional Development

Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Road Safety Partnership Handbook

Frequently asked questions (FAQ) about a borough-wide 20 mph speed limit

Napier City road trauma for Napier City. Road casualties Estimated social cost of crashes* Major road safety issues.

TRAFFIC IN THE CITY Strategic Transportation Department of the Built Environment

MTCF. Michigan Traffic Crash Facts FACT SHEETS

Ottewell Traffic Shortcutting Pilot Project

Road Safety Strategy

High 2010 Medium 2010/11. PCT NHS Darlington Primary Care Trust HPC DBC DBC. High HPC. Med to High

TERM CONTRACT FOR THE MANAGEMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF THE SCOTTISH TRUNK ROAD NETWORK NORTH EAST UNIT

Sardis Elementary School Road Safety Plan. Produced by: Sardis Elementary School - Safer School Travel Team in cooperation with Safer City

For Information Only. Pedestrian Collisions (2011 to 2015) Resolution. Presented: Monday, Apr 18, Report Date Tuesday, Apr 05, 2016

Delivering Accident Prevention at local level in the new public health system

Review of Considerations and Requirements for Automated Enforcement

Southside Road. Prepared for: City of St. John s Police & Traffic Committee. Prepared by: City of St. John s Traffic Division

APPENDIX C. Systems Performance Report C-1

Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Road Safety Partnership Handbook

1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey

Freeway ramp intersection study

Vision Zero San Jose. Moving toward zero traffic deaths and providing safe streets for all

EUROPEAN TRANSPORT CONFERENCE 2006 ROAD SAFETY IN LONDON PAST SUCCESSES AND FUTURE INNOVATIONS

Kolkata City Fatal Accident Study (April 2016 March 2017)

TORONTO VISION ZERO Improving Safety for Pedestrians and Cyclists Roger Browne, Manager Traffic Safety Unit October 11, 2018

Effects of Traffic Signal Retiming on Safety. Peter J. Yauch, P.E., PTOE Program Manager, TSM&O Albeck Gerken, Inc.

Appendix ELP El Paso, Texas 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

City of Vestavia Hills Traffic Calming Policy for Residential Streets

KC Scout Kansas City s Bi-State Transportation Management Center

20mph Speed Limit Trial Warrington Borough Council. Mark Tune Traffic Management & Road Safety Manager

POLICY: TRAFFIC CALMING

THE CITY OF CARDIFF COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM: 4 CYNGOR DINAS CAERDYDD

About the Studio. Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy - Rutgers University

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL (SR2S)

[ Fundación PONS ] [ Fundación PONS ] [ Expertise PONS ] Investing in road safety

Operation Safe Stop 2017

Traffic Safety Basic Facts 2010

2015 Victorian Road Trauma. Analysis of Fatalities and Serious Injuries. Updated 5 May Page 1 of 28. Commercial in Confidence

Richmond-Adelaide Cycle Tracks

Review of Fatal Collisions

Appendix BGH 1. Location Plan of Traffic Survey Sites

Speed Reduction in School Zones

APPENDIX 2 LAKESHORE ROAD TRANSPORTATION REVIEW STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Public Event 1 Community Workshops

Pedestrian Count Report December /02/2018

PROCEDURE Cycle Patrol. Number: A 0604 Date Published: 15 December 2015

CITY OF OTTAWA ROADWAY MODIFICATION APPROVAL UNDER DELEGATED AUTHORITY

road safety issues 2002 road trauma for TNZ Region Two July 2003 Road deaths Estimated social cost of crashes* Major road safety issues

Background. The scale of the problem. The scale of the problem. Road Safety in London, the statistics. 280 Fatalities from road crashes in 2002

Chapter 5. Complete Streets and Walkable Communities.

Safe Routes to School Travel Plan 2011 Reading-Fleming Intermediate School (RFIS)

395 Express Lanes Extension

Transcription:

HIGH STREET & ROYAL AVENUE TRAFFIC SURVEY On Behalf of Belfast City Centre Management 27 th March 2012 0

High Street & Royal Avenue Traffic Report Cover Image Courtesy of David Lloyd AECOM Design & Planning BCCM SR No. 63 Peter Moore* *c/o Belfast City Centre Management 2 nd Floor Sinclair House 95 101 Royal Avenue Belfast BT1 1FE 1

Contents 1. Introduction Figure One: Map of monitoring points 2. Results Figure Two: High Street vehicle usage percentages Figure Three: Royal Avenue vehicle usage percentages Figure Four: Overall data trends in traffic numbers Figure Five: Illegal traffic usage at High Street Figure Six: Illegal traffic usage at Royal Avenue 3. Comparison with previous surveys Figure Seven: High Street Dec 2010 March 2012 Comparison Figure Eight: Royal Avenue Dec 2010 March 2012 Comparison Page 3 Page 3 Pages 4 7 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 6 Page 7 Pages 7 9 Page 8 Page 9 4. Conclusion Page 10 Appendix One: Copy of the PSNI survey Page 11 2

1. Introduction 1.1 Vehicular access into Belfast city centre is restricted and unauthorised vehicles are not permitted to enter the restricted zone[s] between the hours of 11.00am and 6.00pm. Buses are the only vehicles permitted to use Royal Avenue. However, many unauthorised vehicles violate this restriction, causing congestion and obstruction for authorised vehicles, pedestrians and public transport services. As part of the ongoing monitoring of traffic flow patterns through Belfast city centre, a traffic survey was undertaken by the PSNI City Centre Beat (CCB) officers and BCCM Business Liaison Officers on Tuesday 27th March 2012 (representing approximately 6 months from the last survey which took place in September 2011 BCCM SR No. 51). The data was collected between 11:00am 3:00pm at the two access points (High Street [entry point at the corner with Bridge Street] and Royal Avenue [entry point at junction with North Street] respectively), Figure One. Traffic flow was measured on High Street between 11:00am and 1:00pm and on Royal Avenue from 1:00pm to 3:00pm. The first hour at each location was monitored by the uniformed PSNI officers. As the police have powers to stop vehicles, the CCB were able to question drivers as to their reason for being in the restricted zone. This information was recorded at both locations during the hour of the police monitoring only. 1.2 During the course of this survey, vehicles entering the restricted zone during the second hour at each location were counted only by the business liaison officers. This was a strategic monitoring decision to determine the difference that the presence of a uniformed PSNI officer (which could be deemed as a physical deterrent) would be against that of an inconspicuous business liaison officer. 1.3 As part of Phase I of the Streets Ahead Project the installation of rising bollards at key locations within Belfast city centre will help to enforce the traffic regulations between 11:00am 6:00pm. In partnership with Department for Social Development, BCCM will manage these installations and it is envisaged that these will be fully operational by the summer of 2012. Figure One: Map showing locations of checkpoints 3

2. Results 2.1 High Street During the 2 hour survey in High Street, all vehicular traffic was monitored; the results can be seen in Figure Two. Buses comprise 39% of the total traffic, which represents a 1% increase. There has been a rise in the car volume of 2% to 51%. There has been a reduction in both the light and heavy goods use, light goods has fallen by 2% to 9% and heavy goods by 1% to constitute 1% of the total traffic. It should be noted that this does not include traffic travelling out of the city and the cars that may have used Castle Street which, following the completion of the Streets Ahead Project, has been re-opened to two-way traffic. Figure Two: Percentage figures for High Street traffic use Previous surveys had found that the second hour saw an increase in traffic flow (thought to be due to the lack of uniformed officers during this monitoring period). However, the figures were comparable for both hour periods. 2.2 During the first hour of monitoring by the CCB (11.00am 12.00pm) it was established that a total of 30 vehicles used the High Street entry point illegally, representing 17.9% of the total traffic flow during this hour (a decrease of 2.5% on the September 2011 survey). 2.3 Royal Avenue The majority of traffic (85%) using Royal Avenue comprised buses which constitutes the same percentage as recorded in September 2011 (Figure Three). There has been a reduction in the percentage of cars using the street from 12% to 11%. However, buses are the only vehicles legally able to use the street. Light goods vehicles saw no change comprising 3% of the total traffic usage. 4

Figure Three: Percentage figures for Royal Avenue traffic use As was noted when examining the High Street figures; there was no significant statistical rise in the number of vehicles (legal or illegal) accessing Royal Avenue during the inconspicuous Business Liaison Officer monitoring period representing a change from previous surveys. 2.4 During the first hour of monitoring by the CCB (1:00pm 2.00pm) it was established that a total of 10 vehicles used the Royal Avenue entry point illegally, representing 7.2% of the total traffic flow during this hour (a decrease of 7.8% on the September 2011 survey). 2.5 March 2012 Comparative Results If one examines the total combined traffic figures (Table One), High Street accounted for 54.5% of the traffic recorded, and Royal Avenue 45.5%. The overall trend has been for a continued reduction in overall traffic numbers since the statistical high point of June 2011 (Figure Four). Street / Vehicle Car Bus Light Goods Heavy Goods Motorbike Total High Street 86 65 15 1 0 167 Royal Avenue 16 118 4 0 1 139 Total[s] 102 183 19 1 1 306 Table One: Overall traffic numbers for High Street and Royal Avenue 5

2.6 Illegal Usage Figure Four: Overall traffic trends September 2010 March 2012 Date of Survey Overall (Total) Vehicle Numbers Sep-10 395 Dec-10 401 Mar-11 421 Jun-11 459 Sep-11 364 Mar-12 306 The number of vehicles using High Street illegally was also recorded by the CCB officers during the first hour only (Figure Five). On High Street between 11:00am and 12:00pm, a total number of 42 cars were recorded, 17 of which (40.4%) were illegal; an increase of 16.1% Of 9 LGV s, 5 (55.5%) were illegal representing an increase of 43%. Overall, during the hour long CCB monitoring period, 26.8% of the High Street Traffic was illegal. This represents an increase of 12.7% on the September 2011 figures. 6

Figure Five: Illegal usage recorded by the CCB at High Street 2.7 The numbers of vehicles using Royal Avenue illegally was also recorded by the CCB officers (Figure Six). On Royal Avenue between 1:00pm and 2:00pm a total number of 7 cars were recorded, 6 of which (85.7%) were illegal; a reduction of 14.3%. All three LGV s recorded were using Royal Avenue illegally, as was the single motorcyclist. It was noted that a number of drivers (from the Republic of Ireland) stated that their Sat-Nav system had directed them into the restricted zone. BCCM previously wrote to Sat Nav companies to request that the restricted zone of Belfast city centre is included in their software. Figure Six: Illegal usage recorded by CCB at Royal Avenue 7

3. Comparisons with previous surveys 3.1 By comparing the overall data with that collected over the course of previous surveys, comparative analysis can be made for the traffic patterns from both High Street and Royal Avenue. For High Street, one can see that the overall numbers of vehicles are at their lowest point (for all vehicle types) since December 2010 (Figure Seven). Although one must still note that the illegal usage percentage and numbers have increased since the last survey (see section 2.6). 3.2 If one takes the same comparative timeframe for Royal Avenue, it is also clear that, in generic terms, the overall number of vehicles using the street has decreased. This is in line with overall traffic trends noted in section 2.5: Figure Four). Figure Seven: High Street comparative results December 2010 March 2012 Date / Vehicle Type Car Bus Light Goods Heavy Goods Motorcycle Dec-10 105 114 19 3 2 Mar-11 122 122 26 4 2 Jun-11 141 127 31 6 1 Sep-11 92 73 21 4 0 Mar-12 86 65 15 1 0 8

Figure Eight: Royal Avenue comparative results December 2010 March 2012 Date / Vehicle Type Car Buses Light Goods Heavy Goods Motorcycle Dec-10 16 135 7 1 0 Mar-11 14 126 5 0 0 Jun-11 23 123 5 2 0 Sep-11 32 135 7 0 0 Mar-12 16 118 4 0 1 9

4. Conclusions 4.1 On vehicle volume alone, there has been a reduction in numbers of vehicles using High Street and Royal Avenue. However, on High Street there has been an increase in the number of vehicles using the street illegally. There has been a reduction on the number of vehicles using Royal Avenue illegally (as recorded during the first hour of the survey at each location by the City Centre Beat officers). 4.2 Work still needs to be undertaken to inform and make drivers aware that Royal Avenue is illegal for all traffic with the exception of buses. 4.3 BCCM will contact the Sat-Nav companies again to reiterate that their software is directing drivers into the restricted zone of Belfast city centre and that warning messages should be incorporated into the software. 4.3 The activation of the rising bollard traffic control system (scheduled for the summer of 2012), will not have a direct bearing on the High Street and Royal Avenue traffic. However, it has been stated that the implementation of such a bollard system in Royal Avenue is not feasible given the frequency of public transport traffic. 10

Appendix One BELFAST CITY CENTRE PSNI TRAFFIC SURVEY Tue 27 th March 2012 TYPE OF VEHICLE: CAR BUS LIGHT GOODS HEAVY GOODS M CYCLE REASON FOR ENTERING: Bank Blue Badge Drop off or Lost Park Permit Short cut Work Other Pick up ENTRY:- LEGAL ILLEGAL Is driver aware of N/A YES NO Committing an offence? TYPE OF VEHICLE: CAR BUS LIGHT GOODS HEAVY GOODS M CYCLE REASON FOR ENTERING: Bank Blue Badge Drop off or Lost Park Permit Short cut Work Other Pick up ENTRY:- LEGAL ILLEGAL Is driver aware of N/A YES NO Committing an offence? TYPE OF VEHICLE: CAR BUS LIGHT GOODS HEAVY GOODS M CYCLE REASON FOR ENTERING: Bank Blue Badge Drop off or Lost Park Permit Short cut Work Other Pick up ENTRY:- LEGAL ILLEGAL Is driver aware of N/A YES NO Committing an offence? 11