NCHRP Project 9-40 Update Optimization of Tack coat for HMA Placement

Similar documents
Challenges of Tack Coat

NCHRP Project Synthesis Topic Tack Coat Specifications, Materials, and Construction Practices

Tack Coat Effect on Field Performance. February 3rd, 2015 NCAUPG/ICT Joint Meeting

Illinois Center for Transportation

Panel Discussion: Tack Coat - Storage and Handling - Sampling and Testing

Project Review Committee

TRACKLESS TACK/ SPRAY PAVERS

Update on Performance of Thin Asphalt Overlays

GOOD AFTERNOON!!! 2012 FDOT / FTBA Conference. Dave Drehmer. Mariani Asphalt an Associated Asphalt Company

BOND EXPECTATIONS FOR ASPHALT CONCRETE LAYERS APPLIED TO MILLED SURFACES IN VIRGINIA

Performance of Ultra-Thin Bounded Wearing Course (UTBWC) Surface Treatment on US-169 Princeton, Minnesota. Transportation Research

Advantages & Specifications for the Use of Perma-Patch for the Repair of Potholes

ASPHALT PAVING LEVEL 1

Low Traffic Volume LR 159 Low Traffic Preservation

I-64 BATTLEFIELD BLVD: PERFORMANCE MEETS EXPECTATION

City of West Des Moines PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

The Use and Performance of Geogrids in Kentucky

Five Years Later. Illinois Asphalt Pavement Association Annual Meeting March 9, William J. Pine, P.E. Emulsicoat, Inc. / Heritage Research

BEST PRACTICE FOR COMPACTING WARM AND HOT MIX ASPHALT NEAUPG OCTOBER 7,2009

Managing Density For Asphalt Pavement

Pavement and Asset Management from a City s Perspective Mike Rief, PE, DBIA and Andrea Azary, EIT. February 12, 2015

Compaction Theory and Best Practices

Burns Cooley Dennis, Inc. Geotechnical and Materials Engineering Consultants Performance of Permeable Friction Courses NCHRP 9-41

SECTION 48 - TRAFFIC STRIPES AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS TABLE OF CONTENTS

(PLANT MIXED ASPHALT PAVEMENT (MSCR)). REVISED 02/03/17 DO NOT REMOVE THIS. IT NEEDS TO STAY IN FOR THE CONTRACTORS.

ROLLER COMPACTED CONCRETE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION FOR INTERMODAL TERMINALS

High Performance Racetracks

"Emul Asph (SS-1HP) Tack".

SECTION 48 - TRAFFIC STRIPES AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS TABLE OF CONTENTS

Use of Roller Compacted Concrete By GDOT. Presented By: Joe W. Sheffield, PE Georgia Department of Transportation District Engineer, Tifton, GA

PAVEMENT FUNCTIONAL SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS

Kraton Ultra-thin HMA / WMA Overlay Study

T-24. A Practical Approach to Managing Density

DRAFT WSDOT PAVEMENT POLICY

HIR on Oklahoma Turnpikes

Separating Load from Moisture Effects in Wet Hamburg Wheel-Track Test

County of Sacramento Standard Construction Specifications January 1, 2008 TECHNICAL PROVISIONS

FIELD GUIDE. for the Airport Pavement Maintenance Recommendation Tool for ACRP Report 159 AIRPORT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAM

DETECTING INTERLAYER DELAMINATION IN ASPHALT AIRPORT PAVEMENTS USING STRAIN GAGE INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEMS

VDOT s Pavement Management Program. Presented by: Tanveer Chowdhury Maintenance Division, VDOT March 05, 2010

Case Studies Using Falling Weight Deflectometer Data with Mechanistic Empirical Design and Analysis

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

FRICTION AND SURFACE TEXTURE EVALUATION OF GREEN COLORED BIKE LANES

CONTRACTOR MIX DESIGN GUIDELINES ASPHALT CONCRETE

Presented to: Louisiana Transportation Conference February 26, Presenter: Corey Zollinger, P.E

MNDOT PAVEMENT DESIGN MANUAL

MnROAD Mainline IRI Data and Lane Ride Quality MnROAD Lessons Learned December 2006

General Notes. Project No /15/2018 Page 1 of 1

DN-PAV (HD 300) TII Surface Dressing Design Method

PAVEMENT AND ALIGNMENT DESIGN OF A NEW RURAL ROAD IN THE PROVINCE OF BOLOGNA

Summary of Findings Concerning Longitudinal Cracking on 16' Wide Ramps

Update on Latest Research

Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION. Asphalt Update. Howie Moseley State Bituminous Materials Engineer

Stop Chasing & Start Managing Density

Driveway Design Criteria

Rennick Yard Roller-Compacted Concrete Pavement

SUPERPAVE Construction Lessons Learned. NEAUPG Annual Meeting Wilkes-Barre, PA October 23, 2003

Introduction to Full Depth Asphalt Repairs. Setting Work Processes for a Quality Job Start in time to finish prior to Winter!

50 Year Roads: Don't Accept Anything Less

OHD L-44 METHOD OF TEST FOR MEASUREMENT OF WATER PERMEABILITY OF COMPACTED PAVING MIXTURES

Driving Indiana s Economic Growth

Pavement Quality Indicators

ADDENDUM REPORT. Project: Bid Package: 2 Current Let: 06/24/ :00 AM Version: Addendum Addendum : 1

Kentucky s Surface Transportation System

EASTBOUND AND WESTBOUND ROADWAYS MILEPOST TO MILEPOST OTTAWA AND SANDUSKY COUNTIES, OHIO

NOTES FOR FIRST COAT SEALING

Tex-616-J, Construction Fabrics

Asphalt Recycling and Pavement Preservation in Hillsborough County, Florida

Using RAP in Asphalt Mixtures

Emerging Concrete Pavement Solutions Roller Compacted Concrete (RCC)

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Mechanical Stabilisation for Permanent Roads

General Notes. Project No /15/2018 Page 1 of 1

PRO-TEX TRUCKBED LINER TECHNICAL DATA SHEET

Burns Cooley Dennis, Inc. Burns Cooley Dennis, Inc.

NOTES FOR RESEALING. This specification is produced primarily for works on state highways.

Study of the Effects of Buried Pipe Integrity on Roadway Subsidence

SUPERPAVE MIX DESIGN. Superpave Mix Design 1

Page 1 of KA

2017 Pavement Management Services Pavement Condition Report Salt Lake City, UT

Asphalt Pavement Analyzer (APA) Evaluation

TECHNICAL DATA SHEET INNOPUR COURT AC-200 ( RESURFACER ) WATERBORNE REPAIR AND ADHESION MATERIAL FOR ASPHALT AND CONCRETE

AEMA-ARRA-ISSA-PPRA Fall Meeting Recycling, Ayrton Senna Highway Brasil, & USA

Keeping good roads good

Forensic Analysis of a 22-Year Old 35% RAP Interstate Project

CHAPTER 5: VACUUM TEST WITH VERTICAL DRAINS

Use Part II for absorptive mixtures that have more than 2.0 percent water absorption.

Pavement Type Selection Not a Black or White Issue. Marvin Traylor

Tabulation of Bids. Counties: ROUTE 202,ALEXAUKEN CREEK ROAD TO RT 179/CR514

Project Update: Characterization of Alaskan Hot-Mix Asphalt containing RAP

OHD L-44 METHOD OF TEST FOR MEASUREMENT OF WATER PERMEABILITY OF COMPACTED PAVING MIXTURES

INVESTIGATION OF THE ******* BICYLE CRASH

Pavement Management Program

FHWA/IN/JTRP-2009/22. Final Report. Rebecca S. McDaniel Karol J. Kowalski Ayesha Shah Jan Olek Robert J. Bernhard

Tabulation of Bids. Counties:

IMPROVED RICE METHOD FOR DETERMINING THEORETICAL MAXIMUM SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF ASPHALT PAVING MIXTURES

Accuracy and Precision of High-Speed Field Measurements of Pavement Surface Rutting and Cracking

Clear Zone Conflicts in AASHTO Publications

A Traffic Operations Method for Assessing Automobile and Bicycle Shared Roadways

Item 585 Ride Quality for Pavement Surfaces

Transcription:

NCHRP Project 9-40 Update Optimization of Tack coat for HMA Placement Louay N. Mohammad Louisiana Transportation Research Center Louisiana State University Emulsion: Design, Construction, and Performance Seminar July 1, 2008 Baton Rouge, Louisiana

What is a Tack Coat? Light application of asphalt, usually asphalt diluted with water. Used to ensure a bond between the surface being paved and the overlying course TOP Layer interface BOTTOM Layer

What is NOT A BOND? DEBONDING TOP Layer interface BOTTOM Layer Loss of ADHESION and/or INTERLOCK at the interface: high shear stresses τ road loads Long term pavement performance and durability can be affected by Debonding as well as Rutting and Cracking.

Common Tack Coat Materials Hot AC ( AC-20, AC-30, ) Emulsified Asphalts ( SS-1, SS-1h, CRS-2, CSS-1h, ) Cutback Asphalts ( RC-70, RC-250, )

Why is Tack Coat Used? Bind two pavement layers Monolithic structure withstand/transfer shear stresses from traffic loading Lack of bond between the wearing and binding layers Cause slippage activate distress mechanisms and rapidly lead to total failure 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 interface.subgrade Base AC Shear Stress (psi)

Objective Determine for the various uses of tack coats optimum application methods, equipment type and calibration procedures, application rates, and asphalt binder materials Recommend revisions to relevant AASHTO methods and practices related to tack coats

Survey Worldwide survey was conducted to determine various tack coat practices Sections: Tack Coat Materials Tack Coat Application Methods Characterization of Tack Coat Application 27 Questions

Literature Review - States Responded 46 state DOTs, Washington D.C. 5 Provinces in Canada. Other countries Denmark Finland South Africa Netherlands WWW.LTRC.LSU.EDU

Development of Test Equipment Tack Coat Quality» Equipment Development Interface Bond Strength» Equipment Development

Characterization of Tack Coat Quality Torsion Tension

Time Characterization of Tack Coat Quality Louisiana Tack Coat Quality Tester -- LTCQT Developed equipment Tack coat quality -- residual Tension User friendly, Easy to use Laboratory and field Draft test method in AASHTO format Tensile load Displacement Tensile Force Time Force

Characterization of Interface Bond Strength

Characterization of Interface Bond Strength Direct Shear Torsion

Interface Bond Strength Test Louisiana Interlayer Shear Strength Tester (LISST) Developed equipment Interface Bond Strength Shear Easy to use Portable Adoptable to exiting load frames Reasonable cost accommodate both 100 and 150-mm sample diameter Draft test method in AASHTO format

Pavement surface types: existing HMA, milled HMA, and PCC Surface Condition: clean and dirty/dusty Wet and Dry Tack coat material types Hot AC» PG 64-22 Emulsion Factors Considered Experiment To Study Tack Coat» CRS-1, Trackless, SS-1h, SS-1 Application rates (residual): high, medium, and low Surface coverages by tack coat: 100% and 50%

Factors Considered Experiment To Study Tack Coat Surface Type: HMA PCC Milled Tack Coat Type 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 PG 64-22 SS-1h CRS-1 Trackless No Tack PG 64-22 SS-1h SS-1 SS-1h SS-1 Coverage Rate 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 50 & 100% 50 & 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Residual Rate (gal/yd 2 ) 3 3 3 3 1 3 3 3 3 3 0.031 0.031 0.031 0.031 0.031 0.031 0.031 0.062 0.062 0.062 0.062 0.062 0.062 0.062 0.155 0.155 0.155 0.155 0.155 0.155 0.155 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 0.031 0.062 0.155 Surface Condition Wet & Dry Wet & Dry Dry Dry Dry Wet & Dry Wet & Dry Dry Wet & Dry Dry Cleanliness 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 High & Low High & Low High High High High High High High High Temperature 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 77 F 77 F 77 F 77 F 77 F 77 F 77 F 77 F 77 F 77 F Normal Load 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 & 20 psi 0 & 20 psi 0 & 20 psi 0 & 20 psi 0 & 20 psi 0 & 20 psi 0 & 20 psi 0 & 20 psi 0 & 20 psi 0 & 20 psi Replicates 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Subtotal 144 144 18 18 6 36 36 18 36 18 Total 330 90 54 Grand Total 474 474 0.031 0.062 0.155

Experiment To Study Tack Coat 0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Survey of Test Lanes Surface texture measurement Sand Patch Method, Road Surface Profiler Circular Texture (CT) Meter

Distributor Truck Calibration Equipments Asphalt Products Unlimited, Inc Computerized tack coat distributor truck Etnyre, Model 2000

Distributor Truck Calibration Geotextile Pad layout ASTM 2995 One transverse direction and two longitudinal directions Longitudinal 2 18 Longitudinal 1 13 17 12 16 11 15 14 Transverse 1 Left Wheel of Truck 10 9 5 ft 5 ft Right Wheel of Truck 8 7 6 5 3 4 2 1

Distributor Truck Calibration Direction of Truck

Lane Layout Existing HMA Surface 0.031 gsy CRS-1 100% Coverage 0.062 gsy 0.155 gsy 0.155 gsy 0.031 gsy Trackless 100% Coverage 0.062 gsy 0.155 gsy 0.155 gsy 0.031 gsy SS-1h 50% 0.062 gsy Coverage 0.031 gsy SS-1h 100% 0.062 gsy Coverage

Spray of Emulsion 100% Coverage 50% Coverage

Overlay Construction Material Transfer Vehicle

Video Presentation Emulsion Spray Tack Coat Quality Testing Overlay Construction Coring Interface Bond Strength testing

Interface Shear Strength 25C Existing HMA Surface, 100% Coverage CRS-1 SS-1H Trackless Shear Strength (psi) 100 80 60 40 20 0 No Tack Low Med High

Acknowledgement APU Distributor Truck SS-1h, CRS-1 Costal HMA Overlay Blacklidge Trackless

T H A N K Y O U