Interstate 66 Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)

Similar documents
Interstate 66 Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement. Cooperating and Participating Agencies Meeting March 19, 2012

DULLES AREA TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION (DATA) February 18, Susan Shaw, P.E., VDOT, Megaprojects Director

I-66 Corridor Improvements Route 15 to I-495. November 2014

Washington DC Section of ITE Project Briefing

Institute for Real Estate Management Chapter (IREM) 77 VDOT Northern Virginia Megaprojects September 13, 2017

I-395 Express Lanes Northern Extension Project Public Hearings

Dulles Area Transportation Association. October 11, Susan Shaw, P.E., Megaprojects Director Virginia Department of Transportation

Transform 66 Project February 4, 2016 Partnering Conference Michigan Department of Transportation American Council of Engineering Companies

I-395 Express Lanes Northern Extension Project Crystal City Civic Association September 21, 2016

I-395 Express Lanes Northern Extension Project Fairlington Citizens Association September 12, 2016

City of Fairfax, Virginia City Council Work Session

Transform I-66. Chief Engineer Garrett W. Moore, P.E. July 12, 2018

Commuter Connections Regional TDM Marketing Group Meeting

I-395 Express Lanes Northern Extension Project Arlington County Board October 18, 2016

VDOT I-66 Inside the Beltway Eastbound Widening Environmental Assessment. Staff Recommendations

TRANSIT PERFORMANCE IN THE I-66 INSIDE THE BELTWAY CORRIDOR

FY 2018 I-66 Commuter Choice Program Presentation to the Northern Virginia Transportation Commission May 3,

EXHIBIT B-1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION. Phase 1 of the Preferred Alternative

NORTHERN VIRGINIA HIGHLIGHTS for the Dulles Area Transportation Association

Preliminary Transportation Analysis

County of Fairfax, Virginia. Department of Transportation

Capital Beltway HOT Lanes Project

Interstate 66 TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL REPORT. From US Route 15 in Prince William County To Interstate 495 in Fairfax County FEBRUARY 2013

Capital Beltway HOT Lanes Project

495 EXPRESS LANES NORTHERN EXTENSION STUDY COMMENT SUMMARY REPORT JUNE 11, 2018 PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING

TYSONS CORNER BICYCLE MASTER PLAN

FY Transportation Capital Improvement Plan Update Arlington Committee for Transportation Choices

Alternatives Development Technical Report

Public Opinion about Transportation Issues in Northern Virginia

Capital Beltway HOT Lanes - Frequently Asked Questions

What if YOU could help plan Northern Virginia s transportation future?

The Route 29 Corridor Study was initiated at the request of Virginia s Commonwealth

Providing an Efficient and Multi-modal Transportation System

Capital Beltway HOT Lanes Project

FI-2 I-66 Between Route 29, Lee Highway and Route 15, James Madison Highway

WELCOME TO OPEN HOUSE # 1 June 14, 2017

New Measure A Expenditure Categories DEFINITIONS OF ELIGIBLE EXPENDITURES Adopted March 8, 2007

I-95 Express Lanes Fredericksburg Extension (Fred Ex) Public Hearing. September 25, 2017

Fairfax Alliance for Better Bicycling. Susan Shaw, P.E., Megaprojects Director Virginia Department of Transportation

Project Mobility - Route 3 South Express Toll Lanes. Industry Day Overview

Table of Contents. 2.0 Land Use and Transportation Inputs Land Use Factors Transportation Factors

Today s Agenda. Welcome & Introductions. I-526 Lowcountry Corridor Update. Table Discussions. Next Steps / Conclusion

ARRENTON RANSPORTATION

Public Information Meeting

TRASBURG RANSPORTATION

ITEM 15 Notice March 29, 2017

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

Managed Lanes. Steve Schilke, P.E. Major Projects Unit Head District 1. Illinois Traffic Engineering and Safety Conference October 2016

Non-Motorized Transportation 7-1

DRAFT. Memo. Range of the Alternatives Considered in the EIS

Transit and Rail Funding in the Commonwealth

TRANSFORM I-66 COMES WITH MULTI-MODAL OPTIONS

Project Description Form 6V

Appendix B: Forecasting and Traffic Operations Analysis Framework Document

Public Information and Participation Comments

MCA Member Meeting: Tysons Update. Fairfax County Department of Transportation November 13, 2017

122 Avenue: 107 Street to Fort Road

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF CALEDON TRANSPORTATION NEEDS STUDY

1. What is the Doran Street and Broadway/Brazil Grade Separation Project (Project)?

Fairfax County Parkway Widening Fairfax County

Evaluation of Significant Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia Transportation District

MnPASS System Today and the Future

Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 30, 2012

INTERSTATE 395 EXPRESS LANES NORTHERN EXTENSION ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS TECHNICAL REPORT SEPTEMBER 2016

Regional Transportation Needs Within Southeastern Wisconsin

DRAFT BUENA VISTA 2020 TRANSPORTATION PLAN

FY STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM New Jersey Department of Transportation Projects

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS of The Draft 2015 CLRP

Vehicular and Pedestrian Access to Herndon Metrorail Station. Robert B. Boxer, Director John Stuart, Clark Nexen October 28, 2015

ARTINSVILLE ENRY OUNTY REA RANSPORTATION TUDY

Crystal City Citizen Review Council Meeting. July 10, 2013

Bluffdale/ UDOT South High-T Intersection Project Type Operations

The Year Ahead: Virginia Department of Transportation Northern Virginia District

McLEAN CITIZENS ASSOCIATION

Managed Lanes: A National Perspective Managed Lane Strategies

Transportation. Pages E-3 to E-145 PROPOSED FY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP) CCCRC Presentation Thursday, June 14, 2018

Sketch Level Assessment. of Traffic Issues. for the Fluor Daniel I-495 HOT Lane Proposal. Ronald F. Kirby

HOW OUR REGIONAL TAX DOLLARS ARE BEING SPENT THE HONORABLE MARTY NOHE CHAIRMAN, NORTHERN VIRGINIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

Solana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS)

Agenda. Overview PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Appendix C. NORTH METRO STATION AREA TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 88th Avenue Station

Rio Mills Rd/Berkmar Dr Extended Connection

Capital Metro Downtown Multimodal Station

Corporate. Report COUNCIL DATE: June 26, 2006 NO: C012 COUNCIL-IN-COMMITTEE. TO: Mayor & Council DATE: June 22, 2006

Los Altos Hills Town Council - June 18, 2015 Palo Alto City Council June 22, AGENDA ITEM #2.B Presentation

Culpeper District. Albemarle County Monthly Report October, 2011

INTRODUCTION. The focus of this study is to reduce congestion and improve mobility for all modes of transportation. Figure ES-1 Study Corridor Map

Basalt Creek Transportation Refinement Plan Recommendations

November 14, Dulles To DC Loop Public-Private Partnership Proposal. Executive Summary

BRIEFING ON PROPOSED ADDITIONS AND CHANGES Additions and Changes to Projects Proposed for Inclusion in the 2015 CLRP Update

Lynchburg District Update

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... vii 1 STUDY OVERVIEW Study Scope Study Area Study Objectives

Highway 217 Corridor Study. Phase I Overview Report

North Coast Corridor:

3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Arlington County 10-Year Transit Development Plan & Premium Transit Network Briefing. May 2016

Idea-66: Westbound I-66 Inside the Beltway

PUBLIC COMMENT SUMMARY REPORT Public Information Meetings

2045 Long Range Transportation Plan. Summary of Draft

Transcription:

WELCOME Welcome to the second Citizen Information Meeting for the Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). As an integral part in the environmental study process, the study team is seeking your comments on the purpose and need for improvements to the I-66 Corridor. Representatives from the sponsoring agencies and the consultant team are available to answer your questions and listen to your thoughts and concerns. We strongly encourage your comments and feedback. Several key items to note: A Tier 1 EIS differs from traditional EIS s in that it focuses on broad issues such as purpose and need; travel mode (bus, carpool, rail transit, car, etc.) and technology choices; and the general location of proposed improvements. The primary goal of this meeting is to obtain your input on the project s purpose and need and to share information that is available at this intermediate stage of the study. The subsequent Tier 2 analyses will focus on site-specifi c details, including specifi c project impacts, environmental mitigation measures and costs.

PROJECT OVERSIGHT SPONSORING AGENCIES The following transportation agencies are leading the study and are responsible to ensure that it is consistent with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act: Virginia Department of Transportation Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation Federal Highway Administration COOPERATING AND PARTICIPATING AGENCIES Additional federal, state and local agencies have agreed to formally participate in the study. These agencies are charged with providing input on defi ning the purpose and need, determining the range of improvements to be considered, and the methodologies and level of detail required in the analysis of the potential improvements. Federal Transit Administration National Park Service US Army Corps of Engineers US Environmental Protection Agency Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Northern Virginia Regional Commission Northern Virginia Transportation Authority Northern Virginia Transportation Commission Northern Virginia Regional Park Authority Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Potomac and Rappahannock Transportation Commission Virginia Railway Express Fairfax County Prince William County City of Fairfax Town of Vienna Town of Haymarket

PROCESS AND MILESTONES The following decisions will be made at the completion of the Tier 1 study: The concepts to be advanced for the I-66 Corridor, including transit improvements, transportation demand management strategies, and/or roadway improvements. Within these concepts, consideration will be given to managed lanes and tolling. The general location for studying future highway and transit improvements in the Tier 2 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) document(s). Identifi cation of projects with independent utility to be evaluated in Tier 2 NEPA document(s) and evaluated pursuant to other environmental laws, and. Advancing tolling for subsequent study in Tier 2 NEPA documents.

PURPOSE AND NEED The following draft Purpose and Need statement represents the goals of this study: Improve multimodal mobility along the I-66 Corridor by providing diverse travel choices in a cost-effective manner. Enhance transportation safety and travel reliability for the public along the I-66 Corridor. As the study progresses, a wide variety of metrics or measurements will be used to determine how proposed improvement concepts satisfy the project s purpose and need. The types of metrics applied are listed here and more will be developed as the study progresses. Travel time reliability Travel time reductions Improved safety Increased number of mode choices Increased access (transit, pedestrian and bicycle) Reduced number of choke points Predictability System linkage Consistency Traveler information Coordination across modes

POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT CURRENT AND FUTURE Population Employment

EXISTING (2010) DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES ON SCREENLINES

ORIGINS AND DESTINATIONS Eastbound The fi gure on the left shows the origin of traffi c traveling eastbound I-66 between Nutley Street (VA 243) and the Capital Beltway. The green band represents the percent (cumulative) of traffi c that entered I-66 to the west of each interchange. For example 7% of traffi c originated west of US 15, 29% west of Route 28, 46% west of the Fairfax County Parkway. The blue bands show the primary direction of travel inside of the Capital Beltway. The Ffi gure on the right shows the destination of traffi c traveling westbound I-66 between the Capital Beltway and Nutley Street (VA 243). The green band represents the percent (cumulative) of traffi c that remains on I-66 to the west of each interchange. For example 40% of traffi c remains on I-66 to the west of the Fairfax County Parkway, 30% west of Route 28, and 8% west of US 15. The blue bands show the origin of traffi c by direction inside of the Capital Beltway. Westbound

ORIGINS AND DESTINATIONS Eastbound The fi gure on the left shows the origins and destinations of traffi c traveling on I-66 to the east of Route 28. For example 12 % of the traffi c originated from points to the west of US 15. The blue band shows the destination of eastbound traffi c. For example 42% of traffi c remains on I-66 to the east of Route 123. The fi gure on the right shows the origins and destinations of traffi c traveling westbound west of the Fairfax County Parkway. For example 7% of the traffi c originated from points east of the Dulles Toll Road and 12% of the traffi c is destined to points west of US 15. Westbound

ORIGINS AND DESTINATIONS Eastbound The fi gure on the left shows the destination of traffi c travelling eastbound on I-66 west of US 15. The blue band represents the percent of traffi c that originated west of US 15 that remains on I-66 west of each interchange. For example, 38% of the traffi c originating from west of US 15 remains on I-66 just west of the Fairfax County Parkway. Twenty one percent remains on I-66 at the Capital Beltway. The fi gure on the right shows the origins of traffi c heading to the west of US 15 on I-66. For example 4% of traffi c on I-66 west of US 15 originated from points to east of the Dulles Toll Road. Westbound

EXISTING TRANSIT SERVICE

PROJECTS IN THE I-66 CORRIDOR PROJECTS IN PLANNING/STUDY PHASE: I-66 Multi-Modal Study (DC Line I-495): Planning study to determine options and recommend strategies which promote and enhance multi-modal transportation. Study scheduled to be completed in June 2012. I-66 EIS (I-495 Route 15): Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to identify current and future transportation needs along I-66, propose solutions and identify their environmental impacts. A draft EIS is expected by June 2012 for public review and fi nal EIS anticipated by December 2012. DRPT Super NOVA Vision Plan: The Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation (DRPT) planning study will encompass Northern VA south to Caroline County and west to Culpeper and Frederick Counties and will include coordination with MD, DC and WV. This year-long study will identify transit and TDM needs/strategies for the near-, mid- and long-term (2040) and will incorporate stakeholder and public input. Study to be completed in Fall 2012. PROJECTS IN DESIGN PHASE: I-66 ATM Active Traffic Management (DC Line Route 15): Design-build delivery of gantry structures, lane/shoulder control display, queue/incident detectors, robust CCTV coverage, queue/speed warning DMS for lane/shoulder control, responsive incident management, emergency areas with detection/surveillance to enhance mobility/safety. Designbuild procurement is underway. I-66 Spot Improvement #2 (Westmoreland Dr. Haycock Rd.): Addition of a west-bound auxiliary lane by continuation of an on-ramp to an off-ramp at the Dulles Connector Road. No right-of-way is required. A public hearing was held in 2008. The project awaits completion of the I-66 Multi-Modal Study prior to beginning construction. I-66 Spot Improvement #3 (Glebe Rd. Lee Hwy.): Addition of a westbound auxiliary lane by continuation of an on-ramp to an off-ramp. A public hearing was held in 2008. The project awaits completion of the I-66 Multi-Modal Study prior to beginning construction. I-66 Vienna Metro Access Ramp (Near Vaden Street): Provision of a bus-only ramp from both HOV lanes of I-66 to and from the west side of the Vienna Metro Station area. The project is in the design phase. A public meeting will be held in Spring 2012 to receive public input on the project. I-66 Widening (Route 29 Gainesville Route 15 Haymarket): Design-build delivery of pavement widening to add one high occupancy vehicle (HOV) and one general purpose lane in each direction on I-66 and related modifi cations to the westbound off-ramp at Route 15. Preliminary plans have been developed. A public hearing was held in July 2011. The process to procure a private-sector design-build team is underway. I-66/Route 15 Interchange: Reconstruction to address future traffi c volumes, safety, environmental and right-of-way impacts and cost. Concept analysis is underway. A public hearing will be held in Spring 2012 to receive public input on the project. PROJECTS IN CONSTRUCTION: I-66 Spot Improvement #1 (George Mason Dr. Sycamore St.): Addition of a west-bound auxiliary lane by continuation of an on-ramp to an off-ramp. No right-of-way was required and no impacts outside of the immediate I-66 corridor occurred. The project was opened to traffi c in December 2011. I-495 Express Lanes at I-66: Reconstruction of existing bridges, access ramps and construction of a new Beltway express lane access ramp at the I-66/I-495 interchange. Work is scheduled for completion in late 2012. I-66 Pavement Rehabilitation (I-495 Route 50): Design-build project for concrete patching and asphalt overlay on the eastbound and westbound mainline and ramps. The project also includes upgrades to corridor drainage, concrete barrier and guardrail. Construction is underway and scheduled for completion in October 2012. I-66 (Route 29/Linton Hall Road Interchange): Major work along I-66 is complete. Interchange improvements at nearby Route 29 and Linton Hall Road are underway and will further improve I-66 operations. Project completion is scheduled for June 2015. I-66/Route 234 Bypass Park & Ride Lot: A 437-space commuter lot will be accessible from the Balls Ford Road/Cushing Road intersection and will be served by PRTC buses. Buses and HOV vehicles will have direct access to eastbound I-66 from the lot. Construction will begin in Spring 2012 with a summer 2013 opening.

WHAT ARE THE TRANSPORTATION PROBLEMS AND NEEDS IN THE CORRIDOR?

NEXT STEPS As the study progresses continued input will be sought from federal, state, and local government agencies as well as the general public. The next major steps or coordination points are presented in the table below. COORDINATION POINT DATE OF COORDINATION PUBLIC OR AGENCIES INVOLVED METHOD USED FOR COORDINATION REQUIRED AGENCY COORDINATION Purpose and Need November 2011 January 2012 Cooperating and Participating Agencies Public Agency Scoping Meeting Citizen Information Meetings Project Website Comments on Purpose and Need Elements Range of Concepts March 2012 April 2012 Cooperating and Participating Agencies Public Agency Meetings Project Website Comments on Range of Concepts and Concepts Retained for EIS Draft Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement June 2012 Cooperating and Participating Agencies U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Public Emails Letters / Written Comments Notice of Availability Location Public Hearing Project Website Pre-Draft EIS Comments Draft EIS Comments Section 309 Review and Rating Final Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement November 2012 Cooperating and Participating Agencies US Environmental Protection Agency Emails and Letters Notice of Availability Project Website Comments on Pre-Final EIS Section 309 Review and Rating Public Notifi cation Public Record of Decision December 2012 Cooperating and Participating Agencies Public Letters Project Website Notifi cation

THANK YOU...YOUR FEEDBACK IS IMPORTANT! To assist us as we continue this important study, please provide us with your thoughts and comments in one of the following ways: Complete and submit your comment form to us today or provide your oral comments to the verbatim recorder. Submit your self-addressed comment form to our consultant at the following address before February 29, 2012: Parsons Transportation Group 3926 Pender Drive, Suite 100 Fairfax, Virginia 22030 Email your comments or information to: Stephen.C.Walter@Parsons.com or CG.Collins@VDOT.Virginia.gov Please reference I-66 Tier 1 EIS: CIM Comments in the subject line. Keep up-to-date with the study s progress by visiting the project website: www.helpfix66.com