Management History of the Edwards Plateau

Similar documents
RANCHING Wildlife. Texas White-Tailed Deer 2017 Hunting Forecast

Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Long history in ecology

ALTERNATIVE DEER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR GAME MANAGEMENT UNITS. 12A, 12B, 13A, 13B, 16A, 45A, 45B, 45C, and White-tailed Deer Units

Deer Management in Maryland. Brian Eyler Deer Project Leader Maryland DNR

Biologist s Answer: What are your goals? Deer Management. Define goals, objectives. Manager s Question: Should I cull or shoot spikes?

DMU 008 Barry County Deer Management Unit

Implementing a Successful Deer Management Program. Kip Adams Certified Wildlife Biologist Dir. of Ed. & Outreach Quality Deer Management Association

Quality Deer Management and Prescribed Fire Natural Partners in Wildlife and Habitat Conservation

Mule Deer. Dennis D. Austin. Published by Utah State University Press. For additional information about this book

SPOTLIGHT DEER SURVEY YO RANCHLANDS LANDOWNERS ASSOCIATION ±10,400 ACRES KERR COUNTY

DESCRIBE THE HABITAT REQUIREMENTS AND OTHER FACTORS THAT AFFECT WILDLIFE SPECIES NATURAL RESOURCE I FISHERY AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVE 5.

Recommendations for Pennsylvania's Deer Management Program and The 2010 Deer Hunting Season

JF2 RANCH ACRES FRIO COUNTY, PEARSALL, TX REPUBLICRANCHES.COM MURPHY E. RAY. Sales Agent

Enclosed, please find the 2018 Spotlight Deer Survey Report and Recommendations that we have prepared for your review and records.

Early History, Prehistory

DMU 046 Lenawee County Deer Management Unit

DMU 038 Jackson County

18,000 +/- ACRE KNOX COUNTY, TEXAS RANCH BENJAMIN, TEXAS

DMU 006 Arenac County Deer Management Unit

New Changes to the Managed Lands Deer Program (MLDP)

DMU 419 Clinton, Eaton, Ingham, Ionia, and Shiawassee Counties

Deer Management Unit 252

021 Deer Management Unit

DMU 082 Wayne County Deer Management Unit

Deer Management Unit 152

Farm Wildlife Management and Food Plots

DMU 047 Livingston County Deer Management Unit

NORTH TABLELANDS DEER HERD MANAGEMENT PLAN

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE HARVEST MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES FOR HUNTING SEASONS

As the first cool front of the year arrived in the brush country of South Texas, a young

EXHIBIT C. Chronic Wasting Disease

DMU 057 Missaukee County Deer Management Unit

Deer Management Unit 122

IN PROGRESS BIG GAME HARVEST REPORTS FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH Energy and Resource Development

FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT

PREDATOR CONTROL AND DEER MANAGEMENT: AN EAST TEXAS PERSPECTIVE

COOKE COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION

J FLY LOOSE RANCH ACRES LAVACA COUNTY, SPEAKS, TX. JEFF BOSWELL Partner/Broker REPUBLICRANCHES.

2017 LATE WINTER CLASSIFICATION OF NORTHERN YELLOWSTONE ELK

San Juan Basin Elk Herd E-31 Data Analysis Unit Plan Game Management Units 75, 751, 77, 771, and 78

Central Hills Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G9 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

DMU 361 Fremont Deer Management Unit Newaygo, Oceana, N. Muskegon Counties

CHECKS AND BALANCES. OVERVIEW Students become managers of a herd of animals in a paper-pencil, discussionbased

Deer Management Unit 127

Minnesota Deer Population Goals. East Central Uplands Goal Block

CHARLES H. WILLEY PHOTO. 8 November/December 2006 WILDLIFE JOURNAL

Veronica Yovovich, Ph.D. Wildlife Conflict Specialist and Science Program Director Mountain Lion Foundation

Deer Management Unit 255

LEAPS BOUNDS. Growing up hunting as a kid in New Hampshire, I didn t. by Dan Bergeron

Population Parameters and Their Estimation. Uses of Survey Results. Population Terms. Why Estimate Population Parameters? Population Estimation Terms

DMU 043 Lake County Deer Management Unit

MANAGED LANDS DEER PERMITS WHITE-TAILED DEER PROGRAM INFORMATION General Information

Interpreting Deer Harvest Records

Northwest Parkland-Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G7 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

DMU 065 Ogemaw County Deer Management Unit

COUNTY ADVISORY BOARD TO MANAGE WILDLIFE 2019 BIG GAME SEASONS RECOMMENDATIONS

Full summaries of all proposed rule changes, including DMU boundary descriptions, are included in the additional background material.

Mule and Black-tailed Deer

Deer Census - How to Use It to Calculate Harvest

AN ASSESSMENT OF NEW JERSEY DEER HUNTER OPINION ON EXPANDING ANTLER POINT RESTRICTION (APR) REGULATIONS IN DEER MANAGEMENT ZONES 28, 30, 31, 34 AND 47

An association of elk and deer owners committed to the development of their herds and the cervid industry in the state.

7D Ranch & Cattle Companuy 2,544 ACRES FOR SALE IN SAN SABA COUNTY $10,216,000

Ag-Environmental Awards

DMU 053 Mason County Deer Management Unit

White-Tailed Deer Management FAQ

Myane Ranch. 3,525 Acres. Lockhart Real Estate. Zavala County.

DMU 332 Huron, Sanilac and Tuscola Counties Deer Management Unit

Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Annual Performance Report of Survey-Inventory Activities 1 July June IS 0 N

Michigan Predator-Prey Project Phase 1 Preliminary Results and Management Recommendations. Study Background

Street Edmonton, AB T6K 1T8. Alberta Fish and Game Association (AFGA) Position On Game Farming In Alberta February 2004

DMU 056 Midland County Deer Management Unit

RYAN WALKER, New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, P. O. Box 1145, Raton, NM 87740, (575) ,

Deer Management Unit 349

CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE

CHEETAH PROJECT Cheetah Conservation Fund. Interviewers name Date

Minnesota Elk Past and Present. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Wildlife Thief Lake Wildlife Management Area

ARIKAREE DEER HERD MANAGEMENT PLAN

Mule Deer. Dennis D. Austin. Published by Utah State University Press. For additional information about this book. Accessed 3 May :46 GMT

placed on the market.

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Splitting seasons into multiple, shorter ones is preferable to long, crowded seasons.

DMU 045 Leelanau County Deer Management Unit

DMU 452 Northern Multi-County Deer Management Unit

WILD HOGS IN MISSISSIPPI

Fire and Cattle Grazing to Manage Exotic Grass Stands. Eric Grahmann and Alfonso Ortega Santos

"Oh! Deer! & Limiting Factors" adapted from Project Wild Mr. Mark Musselman Audubon at the Francis Beidler Forest

Howell Woods Orientation and Safety Open Book Test

Saguache Mule Deer Herd Data Analysis Unit D-26 Game Management Units 68, 681 and 682 March 2008

DMU 487 Northern Multi-County Deer Management Unit

Elk Restoration in the Northern Cumberland Plateau, Tennessee. Lisa Muller, Jason Kindall, Jason Lupardus University of Tennessee

DRAFT ARIKAREE DEER HERD MANAGEMENT PLAN

Kansas Deer Report Seasons

Archery Gun Muzzleloader Total Bull Cow Bull Cow Bull Cow Bull Cow

Legal Description of Property: Location of Property (distance and direction from nearest town; specify highway/road numbers):

2008 WMU 360 moose, white tailed deer and mule deer. Section Authors: Robb Stavne, Dave Stepnisky and Mark Heckbert

NORTH DAKOTA STATE REPORT June 2018

Coyotes. The coyote, considered by many as a symbol of the Old West, now resides

ARE WHITE-TAILED DEER VERMIN?

Petty Ranch 1,660+/- Acres Shackelford & Haskell County, Texas $2,647,700 ($1,595/acre)

cwd chronic wasting disease management and regulations for hunters

Transcription:

Management History of the Edwards Plateau

Eco regions of Texas Edwards Plateau 24,000,000 acres

About 15,000 years ago, the Edwards Plateau was much cooler and was more forested than today. Pollen counts indicate that this region was more of a spruce forest. There were a group of plants and animals that evolved in this forest 1984-16 territories 1999-56 territories

About 11,000 years ago the climate begin to warm Forests gave way to shrublands Fires became more frequent Black-capped Vireo There were a group of plants and animals that adapted to these brushlands

Shrubland gave way to grasslands Fires became even more frequent There were a group of plants and animals that adapted to these grasslands. Buffalo Impacted the land and created the habitat for the dove, quail, prairie chicken, deer, antelope, elk, all the other animals that depend on forbs or their seeds.

Early European Settlement 1840-1900 At the time of settlement the hill county was being grazed by buffalo and antelope. Deer were rare. Prairie chickens were found in Kerr County as late as 1900 The last black bear was killed in Kerr County in 1909 north of Kerrville The last wolf was killed in west Kerr County in 1913

1900 s to 1940 s Grasslands have given way to shrublands The land is being heavily grazed by cows, sheep, and goats

Deer numbers are increasing Deer Harvest is Bucks only. Spikes and does are illegal.

Juniper (cedar) dramatically increases

A 40 year change No cows, sheep, goats, or deer No management

1940 s to 1960 s Lands are being heavily grazed by cows, sheep, and goats. Reduced stocking rates and early grazing systems are being applied. Deer census indicates over populations and the need for deer herd reduction. Malnutrition is recognized as a major problem with the deer herd. Doe harvest is becoming a primary recommendation. Spike antlered deer are protected. Juniper control is becoming a major objective. Bulldozing, hand cutting and heavy grazing by goats are common management practices to control regrowth cedar. The exotic deer industry is beginning to grow.

Biologist are learning to scientifically census deer populations as well as learning to age deer.

Census data indicates that 20 to 40 percent of the deer herd is dying annually

Adding Exotic Deer to the Mix

They were also figuring out what the primary animals impacting the range actually ate Not all animals can eat the same foods They are selective in the classes of forages they consume

Forbs Browse Grass

Deer Only Deer Only Carrying Capacity Studies Carrying capacity studies demonstrate more deer could survive on cedar cleared land

Stocking rate studies Studies indicated moderate to light stocking rates would produce more deer. They also indicated a combination of cattle and deer produced more deer per acre than grazing with sheep and goats.

Juniper (cedar) was controlled by hand cutting, bulldozing, or chaining

Most pastures were being grazed with continuous grazing systems

Grazing Systems for Wildlife

Relatively easy to manage and require little labor input Range improvement is slow, produces a monoculture of plants, and is more dependent on stocking rates Domestic livestock performance is usually good Less flexible for other management practices because of few pastures

From 1962-1966, the highly successful screwworm fly eradication program had a dramatic effect on increasing deer numbers.

Deer Proof Fence 1968

Increase doe harvest and balance sex ratios Buck to doe ratio 1 : 1 Carrying capacity 120 deer Percent fawn crop 100% Bucks 60 Does 60 The more equal the sex ratio, the more males can be harvested Fawns 60 Buck fawns 30 Doe fawns 30 Buck to doe ratio 1 : 5 Carrying capacity 120 deer Percent fawn crop 100% The more equal the sex ratio, the easier it is to add age to the herd Bucks 20 Does 100 Fawns 100 Buck fawns 50 Doe fawns 50

1970- mid 1980 s Lands are still being heavily grazed by cows, sheep, goats, exotic deer, and white-tailed deer. Whited-tailed deer are gaining in economic importance and more resources are being applied to management. A need for doe harvest is being accepted. Spike harvest is being allowed in more counties. Juniper control is still a major management concern. Prescribed burns are being researched as another juniper control tool. Exotic numbers continue to increase More intensive grazing systems (HILF) are being applied. Began to research the effects of genetics on antler development.

Yearlings

In 1974, the Kerr WMA began a series of studies to determine the effects of nutrition and genetics on antler growth Nutrition Study GENETICS ROLE IN ANTLER DEVELOPMENT STUDY KERR WMA DEER PENS 2.5 yrs. HIGH PROTEIN KERR WMA DEER PENS 2.5 yrs. LOW PROTEIN The bottom line of these studies is that both have a major influence

4 year old deer Kerr WMA Research Pens Spikes 6+ points 3-5 points

High Intensity, Low Frequency (HILF) 20 DAY ROTATION One herd 20 days 365/9 = 40 40/2 = 20 160 DAY ROTATION

Juniper (cedar) was still primarily controlled by hand cutting, bulldozing, or chaining However.

Prescribed fires are used to control regrowth cedar

Kill cedar Release phosphorus & nitrogen Increase quantity Increase variety Increase livestock & deer performance

Range improvement continues 1983 Healthier deer are the result

Mid 1980s to mid 1990 s Sheep and goat industries are greatly reduced. There is a major shift from traditional ranching systems to more of an emphasis to deer and exotic management. Use of prescribed burns, hydraulic shears, and brush cutters are added as juniper control tools. FWS place Hill Country species on the Endangered Species List. Management research begins to recover these species. Deer management is now the primary management objective of many landowners. Selective antler harvest and antler restrictions are being applied. Short duration grazing systems continue to show range improvement. Began to apply genetic research findings.

1984 High intensity grazing systems provide more flexibility in management of pastures

Brush cutters New tools for cedar control Hydraulic shears

Leaving brush strips was recommended as a deer management enhancement

1983 Start of special antlerless hunts and spike hunts

1989 140 lbs. 1994 141 lbs. 168 GBC 1992 141 lbs.

Mid 1990 s to Present Traditional ranching continues its decline. Land fragmentation is becoming a major concern. Interest in deer management continues to increase. The need to control wild exotic deer numbers is being publicly recognized. Increased water recharge through proper range management is being recognized as a major land management product Short duration grazing systems and proper stocking rates are now recognized as a major management tool. Prescribed fire is now recognized as a major land management tool and is now legislatively supported.

Total Exotic Numbers in Texas 250 200 164 196 150 120 100 50 13 30 48 57 72 0 1963 1966 1971 1974 1979 1984 1988 1994

Juniper (cedar) is still being controlled by hand cutting, bulldozing, or chaining

Brush cutters As well as brush cutters and hydraulic shears Hydraulic shears

Use of prescribed fires is increasing

State laws were passed that give landowners the right to burn when there are no burn bans. Trained and certified individuals given the ability when burn bands are instituted..

Managed Land Deer Permits (MLDP) program initiated to assist landowners with deer harvest. The primary objective being range improvement. Although not a major objective it, also provided a better means to to improve the quality of deer in a herd through a more achievable selective removal program.

Range improvement continuous

1997 Start of 4 point or less or antler spread greater than ear width hunts as well as antlerless hunts

Spike Harvest Adds Age To the Herd By removing deer from both the younger age class as well as the older age class, fewer deer in the middle age class need to be harvested. This allows more middle aged deer to reach the older age class.

1997 1998

GBCS 177 6/8 6 1/2 years old 2006

Harvest of 4.5+ Males 1972-82 n= 58 10% 1990-99 n= 100 21%

10 point or better deer 67% 47% W/O Spike Harvest With Spike Harvest

Good deer are the result of good management

Integrated management program Prescribed Fire Controlled grazing Deer herd reduction Brush control

Results of applying all three categories of management Genetics Age Nutrition

Genetics A good deer herd starts with a good genetic base.

In 2015, Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) was found in the Edwards Plateau. As of May 2017, there are 49 known cases of cwd in Texas.