Fish Survey of Goose Lake (ID # ), Ramsey County, Minnesota in 2012

Similar documents
Fish Survey of Arctic Lake (ID # ), Scott County, Minnesota in 2012

Fish Survey of Parkers Lake (ID # ), City of Plymouth, Hennepin County, Minnesota in 2013

LAKE DIANE Hillsdale County (T8-9S, R3W, Sections 34, 3, 4) Surveyed May Jeffrey J. Braunscheidel

Pennsylvania Fish & Boat Commission Biologist Report. Wilmore Dam. Cambria County. May 2011 Trap Net, Electrofishing and Hoop Net Survey

MEMORANDUM Comfort Lake-Forest Lake Watershed District

Penny Road Pond Population Survey

Cedar Lake Comprehensive Survey Report Steve Hogler and Steve Surendonk WDNR-Mishicot

Michigan Dept. of Natural Resources Status of the Fishery Resource Report Page 1. Weber Lake Cheboygan County, T34N, R3W, Sec.

Current Status and Management Recommendations for the Fishery in the Cloverleaf Chain of Lakes

Quemahoning Reservoir

Crooked Lake Oakland County (T4N, R9E, Sections 3, 4, 9) Surveyed May James T. Francis

Lake information report

CORRESPONDENCE/MEMORANDUM

Inventory # Perch Lake

Trapnet Fish Surveys for Sweeney Lake ( ) and Twin Lake ( ), Hennepin County, September 17-19, 2013

JadEco, LLC PO BOX 445 Shannon, IL 61078

Big Bend Lake Population Survey

Lake information report

MARTINDALE POND Wayne County 2004 Fish Management Report. Christopher C. Long Assistant Fisheries Biologist

BIG TWIN LAKE Kalkaska County (T28N, R05W, Section 18, and T28N, R06W, Section 13) Surveyed May 1999

Busse Reservoir South Lateral Pool Population Survey

Rolling Knolls Pond Population Survey

DOW# West Twin Lake

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources

Bode Lake - South Population Survey

Fisheries Survey of White Rapids Flowage, Marinette County Wisconsin during Waterbody Identification Code

McGinty Slough Population Survey

Sag Quarry - West Population Survey

I Region I Area I DOW Number / County I DOW Lake Name I Acreage I

Tampier Lake Population Survey

MIDDLE FORK RESERVOIR Wayne County 2006 Fish Management Report. Christopher C. Long Assistant Fisheries Biologist

East Metro Forest Lake (2,251 acres): Coon Lake (1,481 acres):

Upper/Lower Owl Creek Reservoir

Schiller Pond Population Survey

Michigan Department of Natural Resources Status of the Fishery Resource Report Page 1

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources

LAKE MANAGEMENT PLAN

MIDDLE FORK RESERVOIR Wayne County 2004 Fish Management Report. Christopher C. Long Assistant Fisheries Biologist

WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FISH MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES DELAVAN LAKE SPRING 2012

Alcona Dam Pond Alcona County (T25N, R5E, Sections various) Surveyed June 6-12 and September 16, 2003

LAKE SURVEY REPORT DRAFT VERSION PRELIMINARY DATA (AS OF 08/30/2018) Fisheries Management. DOW Number: Survey ID Date: 08/27/2018

Maple Lake Population Survey

Caro Impoundment, Tuscola County

An Assessment of the Fish Community in Lake Acworth

Fisheries Survey of Saratoga Lake

2014 Island Lake Survey June 13 th, 2014 Andrew Plauck District Fisheries Biologist Report Prepared 4 March 2015

Introduction: JadEco, LLC PO BOX 445 Shannon, IL 61078

Rat Cove and Brookwood Point littoral fish survey, 2002

Aquatic Plant Point-Intercept Survey for Pike Lake, Scott County, Minnesota

Comprehensive Fisheries Evaluation of Patten Lake, Florence County, Wisconsin 2011

Comprehensive Fisheries Survey of High Falls Reservoir, Marinette County Wisconsin during 2004 and Waterbody Identification Code

Wampum Lake Population Survey

NURSERY POND Fish Management Report. Jason C. Doll Assistant Fisheries Biologist

Status Review and Management Outline for Quality Bluegill and Black Crappie Populations in the Grand Rapids Area.

Lake St. Clair Fish Community and Fishery

LAKE SURVEY REPORT DRAFT VERSION PRELIMINARY DATA (AS OF 08/24/2018) Fisheries Management. DOW Number: Survey ID Date: 08/21/2018

Little Calumet River Rapid Response Fish Identification and Enumeration Branch Summary Report

Mark A. Tonello and Ralph L. Hay

O Malley s Ponds Population Survey

Elk Lake, Antrim and Grand Traverse counties T. 28, 29 N., R. 8, 9 W., Sec. many. Lake surveys. began at 40 feet

Arrowhead Lake Population Survey

FISH COMMUNITIES AND FISHERIES OF THE THOUSAND ISLANDS AND MIDDLE CORRIDOR

Archer Lake 2011 Survey Report Prepared by Brian Gunderman

Michigan Dept. of Natural Resources and Environment Status of the Fishery Resource Report Page 1

RECREATIONAL PONDS AND LAKES

A SURVEY OF THE PRETTY LAKE FISH COMMUNITY, LARGEMOUTH BASS AND WALLEYE POPULATIONS AND FISH HARVEST LaGrange County 2010

SUMMARY OF CONOWINGO DAM WEST FISH LIFT OPERATIONS 2012

2010 Fishing Opener Prognosis. Central Region

Job 1 Part JOB 1, PART 2: SUMMARY OF CONOWINGO DAM WEST FISH LIFT OPERATIONS, 2009

Delaware River Seine Survey: 2012 Sampling Summary

Status of Lake Erie s Western Basin Fish Populations: Trends and Environmental Conditions

LAKE PLEASANT Steuben County 2006 Fish Management Report. Larry A. Koza Assistant Fisheries Biologist

KICKAPOO LAKE Shakamak State Park Sullivan, Greene, and Clay Counties 2009 Fish Management Report. David S. Kittaka Fisheries Biologist

7/29/2011. Sport fish. Rough fish. Fish Population Assessment

Michigan Dept. of Natural Resources Status of the Fishery Resource Report Page 1

Fish Assesment of Lake Nokomis (ID # ), Hennepin County, Minnesota in 2008

Green Lake Population Survey

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE SPORT FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

Lake LeAnn 2018 Fish Survey

HUBBARD LAKE Alcona County (T27N, R7E; T28N, R7E) Surveyed May and September Tim A. Cwalinski

JOB 1, PART 2. SUMMARY OF CONOWINGO DAM WEST FISH LIFT OPERATIONS 2011

BEAVER DAM LAKE Kosciusko County 2005 Fish Management Report. Angela C. Benson Assistant Biologist

NEW OAKLAND CITY LAKE Gibson County 2007 Fish Management Report. Michelle L. Weinman Assistant Fisheries Biologist

Crawford Reservoir. FISH SURVEY AND MANAGEMENT INFORMATION Eric Gardunio, Fish Biologist Montrose Service Center

6TH PELLETIER BROOK LAKE T15 R9, Aroostook Co. U.S.G.S. Gardner Pond, Maine (7 1/2 )

A FIELD GUIDE TO LOCAL FISHERIES RESOURCES

LAKE MANAGEMENT PLAN

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fisheries and Wildlife

CARL BLACKWELL LAKE MANAGEMENT PLAN

Waubee Lake Kosciusko County Fish Management Report 2006

Lake information report

Columbia Lake Dam Removal Project

Aquatic Plant Point-Intercept Survey for Cates Lake, Scott County, Minnesota

Current projects for Fisheries Research Unit of Minnesota Department of Natural Resources

Proposed Changes to Bag and Size Limits Minnesota/Wisconsin Border Waters of the Mississippi River

The Fish Fauna of Cranberry Bog, Town of Burlington, Otsego County, N.Y.

SUMMARY REPORT FOR LAKE ST. MALO FISHERIES ASSESSMENT. Prepared for the St. Malo and District Wildlife Association

LITTLE WHITE OAK Knox County 2006 Fish Management Report. Debbie King Assistant Fisheries Biologist

December 18, Dear Sir/Madam,

Aquatic Plant Management and Importance to Sport Fisheries

Transcription:

Softshell Turtle from Goose Lake, July 2012 Fish Survey of Goose Lake (ID #62-0034), Ramsey County, Minnesota in 2012 Survey Dates: July 16-18, 2012 MnDNR Permit Number: 18362 Prepared for: VLAWMO and MnDNR Prepared by: Steve McComas Blue Water Science November 2012

Introduction Goose Lake (ID: 62-0034) is a 145-acre shallow lake, located in Ramsey County, Minnesota. In July 2012, VLAWMO contracted for a fish survey with Blue Water Science with a permit number 18362 granted from the MnDNR. The last fish survey was conducted in 1986 by the MnDNR. The primary objective of this survey was to characterize the fish community in Goose Lake. Methods Six standard trapnets were sampled for two days for a total of twelve lifts to survey fish in Goose Lake. The trapnet was a MnDNR-style with a 4 x 6 feet square frame with two funnel mouth openings and 50-feet lead. Net mesh size was 3/8 inch. Six standard trap nets were set on Monday morning July 16, 2012. Six nets were fished for the following 2 days (July 17, 18). Trapnet locations are shown in Figure 1 and pictures of a typical trapnet operation are shown in Figure 2. Figure 1. Map of trapnet sets. Net 6b was set on the July 16 but was moved on July 17 because of tampering. Net 6 had one day of netting results and the other five nets had two days of netting results for a total of eleven lifts. Goose Lake Fish Survey, 2012 1

A trapnet is a live fish trap. Fish run into the 50-foot lead net and follow it back through a series of hoops with funnel mouths. Fish end up in the back hoop. The back hoop of the trapnet is propped up on the bow (front end) of the survey boat. A dip net is used to remove the fish from the back of the trapnet. Fish are transferred to tubs, then they are counted and measured and released. Figure 2. Trapnet set and fish sampling in the Goose Lake fish survey. Goose Lake Fish Survey, 2012 2

Results Fish Per Net: A total of ten fish species were sampled in Goose Lake on July 17-18, 2012. Bluegill sunfish were the most abundant species followed by black bullheads. Nets 1 through 4, on the east side of the lake, were the most productive (Table 1). The average number of bluegills caught per net was high with the average haul of 131 fish per net (Tables 1 and 2). Largemouth bass had a high population with an average of 15 fish per net. Table 1. Goose Lake fish survey results from July 17-18, 2012 using six nets monitored for 2 days for a total of 11 lifts are shown below. One net in West Goose Lake was pulled to shore during the survey and was not counted for the survey. Nets 3 and 4 were the most productive. Fish Species East Goose West Goose Total Net 1 Net 2 Net 3 Net 4 Net 5 Net 6 Catch Day 1 Day 2 Day 1 Day 2 Day 1 Day 2 Day 1 Day 2 Day 1 Day 2 Day 1 Day 2 Black bullheads 99 150 7 53 68 290 101 71 5 7 -- 31 882 80 Black crappies 39 20 22 1 79 17 99 73 5 1 -- 3 359 33 Bluegills 197 142 25 25 197 233 188 224 62 79 -- 64 1,436 131 Golden shiner 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 -- 0 4 0.4 Green sunfish 0 1 0 0 7 1 0 1 0 1 -- 0 8 0.7 Hybrid sunfish 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 -- 0 10 0.9 Largemouth bass 16 9 1 0 25 19 54 41 2 0 -- 3 170 15 Pumpkinseed 8 9 2 3 22 17 31 6 4 1 -- 2 105 10 White sucker 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 -- 0 1 0.1 Yellow perch 55 47 55 18 33 186 26 21 0 0 -- 1 442 40 TOTAL FISH 414 385 112 100 431 763 500 437 79 95 -- 104 3,420 311 Fish per Net (n=11) Table 2. Goose Lake fish survey trapnet results from July 17-18, 2012 using nets for 2 days for a total of 3 lifts are shown below. One net was pulled to shore during the survey and was not counted for the survey. Blue shading indicates where the number of fish caught, expressed as fish per net, were higher than the typical MnDNR range for a lake like Goose Lake. West Goose (n=3) East Goose (n=8) Goose (n=11) Typical Range (MnDNR) Black bullhead 14 105 80 11.5-132.6 Black crappies 3.0 44 33 2.4-15.1 Bluegills 68 154 131 1.9-29.5 Golden shiner 1.3 0 0.4 0.2-1.1 Green sunfish 0.3 1.3 0.7 0.2-1.9 Hybrid sunfish 1.0 0.9 0.9 NA Largemouth bass 1.7 21 16 0.3-1.2 Pumpkinseed 2.3 12 10 0.8-8.4 White sucker 0 0.1 0.1 0.3-2.6 Yellow perch 0.3 55 40 0.3-3.8 Painted turtle 16 0.4 4.5 -- Snapping turtle 3.7 0 1.0 -- Softshell turtle 0 0.3 0.2 -- TOTAL FISH 92 393 312 -- Goose Lake Fish Survey, 2012 3

Fish Length: Fish lengths are shown in Table 3 and Figure 3. Bluegill lengths ranged from 3.5 inches up to 8 inches with the majority of the population less than 6 inches in West Goose while a majority of the population was 6 inches or greater in East Goose. Largemouth bass were present with lengths up to 16 inches but the most common size was in the 8 to 10 inch range. At these lengths, the bass population has some capacity to capture and ingest small to medium-sized fish and should keep sunfish and bullheads from becoming overpopulated and from producing stunted growth conditions. However, if the largemouth bass move into the 12 to 16 inch range, the predator control component will be enhanced. In the meantime, commercial fishing for bullheads may be necessary to remove the adult bullhead population (bullheads 6 inches or greater) which would reduce the spawning output and help bring the black bullhead population down. Adult bullheads are not easily controlled by fish predation, but the existing fish predation pressure may control the young-of-the-year. Table 3. Length frequency of fish species (as total length) for the West and East Goose Lake fish survey for July 2012. Length (inches) Black Bullhead Black Crappies Bluegills Golden Shiner Green Sunfish Hybrid Sunfish Largemouth Bass Pumpkin -seed White Sucker West East West East West East West East West East West East West East West East West East West East <3 1 3 4 3.5 5 2 4 39 7 1 1 2 4.5 44 17 5 4 5 20 11 3 1 2 1 41 5.5 2 4 3 3 2 1 3 6 6 6 1 7 7 24 1 4 2 9 1 8 6.5 1 7 35 29 1 1 3 1 1 7 20 7 2 1 9 39 56 1 1 1 1 3 6 28 7.5 1 4 34 7 26 6 2 38 8 2 11 1 39 4 14 2 21 8.5 4 9 2 15 24 6 9 17 64 10 36 2 9.5 9 43 5 28 1 10 3 39 4 1 27 10.5 6 2 2 2 5 11 4 1 6 11.5 1 1 12 7 12.5 13 3 13.5 1 14 2 14.5 15 2 15.5 1 16 2 16.5 17 17.5 18 1 Total 42 182 9 135 205 179 4 0 1 10 3 7 5 165 7 36 0 1 1 177 % of the Total Catch Measured 100% 22% 100% 39% 100% 15% 100% -- 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 38% -- 100% 100% 40% Yellow Perch Goose Lake Fish Survey, 2012 4

Figure 3. Length distribution of fish from the July 2012 survey in Goose Lake. Goose Lake Fish Survey, 2012 5

Turtle Results: Painted, snapping, and softshell turtles were sampled in the trapnets and were common in Goose Lake. Turtles will do well in Goose Lake because of the large percentage of a natural shoreline area. Table 4. Painted turtle and snapping turtle catch per net for the two netting days. Net East Goose Lake, July 2012 Painted Turtles Snapping Turtles Softshell Turtles 1 3 0 1 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 West Goose Lake, July 2012 5 44 11 0 6 3 0 0 Total Turtle (11 nets) 50 11 2 Turtle/Trapnet (11 lifts) 4.5 1.0 0.2 Figure 4. Turtles from one net in West Goose Lake. Goose Lake Fish Survey, 2012 6

Representative Fish Species of Goose Lake Hybrid sunfish Bluegill sunfish Black crappie Pumpkinseed sunfish Largemouth bass Yellow perch White sucker Golden shiner Figure 5. Representative fish species found in Goose Lake in July 2012. Goose Lake Fish Survey, 2012 7

Comparison of 1986 and 2012 Fish Surveys The last recorded Goose Lake fish survey occurred in 1986. The 1986 results indicated a sparse fishery with moderate numbers of black bullheads and only two other species in low numbers (brown bullheads and white suckers)(table 5). It is likely that winterkill was a frequent occurrence and severely limited fish. In 2012, fish were abundant, especially in the East Goose basin (Table 5). A variety of fish lengths represents a number of year classes which indicate that winterkill may not be as common compared to the 1980s. The Goose Lake fish population in 2012 was robust with the potential for high quality recreational fishery if yellow perch and largemouth bass can increase in length. Table 5. Two fish surveys have been conducted on Goose Lake since 1986. The first survey was conducted on June 30, 1986 by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR). The second fish survey was conducted on July 17-18, 2012 Blue Water Science (BWS). 1986 Goose 2012 West Goose (n=3) BWS 2012 East Goose (n=8) BWS 2012 Goose (n=11) BWS Typical Range (MnDNR) MnDNR Black bullhead 48 14 105 80 11.5-132.6 Black crappies -- 3.0 44 33 2.4-15.1 Bluegills -- 68 154 131 1.9-29.5 Brown bullhead 0.4 -- -- -- 0.4-4.5 Golden shiner -- 1.3 -- 0.4 0.2-1.1 Green sunfish -- 0.3 1.3 0.7 0.2-1.9 Hybrid sunfish -- 1.0 0.9 0.9 NA Largemouth bass -- 1.7 21 16 0.3-1.2 Pumpkinseed -- 2.3 12 10 0.8-8.4 White sucker 0.4 -- 0.1 0.1 0.3-2.6 Yellow perch -- 0.3 55 40 0.3-3.8 Painted turtle -- 16 0.4 4.5 -- Snapping turtle -- 3.7 -- 1.0 -- Softshell turtle -- -- 0.3 0.2 -- TOTAL FISH 49 92 393 312 -- Figure 6. Bullheads were abundant in East Goose Lake. Goose Lake Fish Survey, 2012 8

Conclusions and Recommendations The trapnet survey in 2012 found the fish community was composed of ten species. The abundance of several species was above average for trapnet catches. Bluegills and black bullheads are not stunted indicating there may be some control from the piscivores. The largemouth bass population has a size range from 6.5 to 16 inches indicating that several year classes of the fish species are surviving over winter. Bluegills, yellow perch, and largemouth bass abundance (as fish/net) are above the typical range for a lake like Goose. Recommendations and future considerations include the following: In Goose Lake, largemouth bass are the dominant gamefish with extremely high numbers. They may ultimately keep black bullheads and bluegill populations under control especially as the bass population increases in length. The black bullhead population is abundant in East Goose with the dominant size class in the 9 to 11 inch range. It is recommended that the best way to reduce this component of the bullhead population is by commercial fishing. Reducing black bullheads could improve water quality. Water quality is poor in Goose Lake but fishing has the potential to be very good for panfish and largemouth bass in the future. In three to four years recreational bass, perch, and bluegill fishing could be very productive if their lengths increase. Dissolved oxygen measurements should be taken over the winter months to assess potential winterkill conditions that could develop if there is a long, cold winter. Figure 7. Fish surveying crew for the Goose Lake 2012 survey. Brian Corcoran (left) VLAWMO, Steve McComas (middle), and Connor McComas (right). Goose Lake Fish Survey, 2012 9

Appendix A Minnesota DNR Fish Survey Notification Goose Lake Fish Survey, 2012 10