Excellent = SQI>48 Good = SQI Fair = SQI Poor = SQI<19

Similar documents
Rouge River Benthic Monitoring Program Spring 2013 Report

STREAM Girls field notebook

River Roundup. October 2017 Data and Trends

Taxonomy. An Introduction to the Taxonomy and Ecology of EPT Families

Monitoring Biological Recovery in the Twomile Run Watershed Following Abandoned Mine Drainage Remediation Clinton County, Pennsylvania November 2013

A Survey of the Metrics Utilized to Determine Macroinvertebrate Indices in Eight Southeastern States

Consolidated Data on the river Puyo and Piatua

Data Sheet. Macroinvertebrate Assessment. Part II: Water Quality Score. Part I: Color Dots. Color Code & Sensitivity Points. Type of Macroinvertebrate

Macroinvertabrate and Water Quality Survey of Smelt Brook

A Stream In A Bucket An introduction to aquatic macroinvertebrates and other stream life.

Joe Rathbun Michigan DEQ Water Resources Division Nonpoint Source Unit * Thanks to The Nature Conservancy

5/14/14 (Wed. ) 5/17/14 (Sat. ) Working Together to Restore and Protect Our Natural Resources. Winter 2014 Newsletter

Water Quality and Habitat in Shingle Creek

Making the Most of Your Monitoring Using Macroinvertebrates

Rouge River Watershed 2016 Winter Stonefly Search

report Reefton Hydro-electric Power Project Assessment of Aquatic Effects April 2014 Submitted to: Reefton Powerhouse Trust

Stream Insects of the Pacific Northwest

RIVER SEGMENTS. Manistee River Assessment. Figure 1. The Manistee River watershed in northwestern lower Michigan. Seg 1 Deward.

Aquatic Macroinvertebrate ID

CORE CURRICULUM CONTENT STANDARDS. Language Arts 1(12), 2(2,5) Science 3(1-3), 4(1,2), 5(1,4,6), 6(1,8) Arts 3(1,2), 5(1)

Final Draft. Freshwater Creek Watershed Analysis Dissenting Report: Fisheries Module April 26, Table of Contents

ESTABLISHING A TROUT FISHERY IN MILL CREEK

STREAM DRIFT. Much variation among taxa: Fraction of benthos drifting: Distance drifted? at any moment? over 24 hr period?

A COMPARATIVE ECOLOGICAL STUDY OF THREE STREAM FAUNAS IN THE AUCKLAND AREA. by J.A. McLean

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

Au Sable River Assessment

Stoneflies. Yet another group of aquatic life disappearing from rivers. John Woodling Colorado Mesa U Environmental Sciences Department

The Upper Manistee River Restoration

BIG Idea: Aquatic insects can provide information about water and ecosystem health, and how it changes over time.

Mill Creek/Rose Valley Watershed General Information Presented by Dr. Mel Zimmerman Lycoming College CWI

INDICATOR BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATE SPECIES AND THEIR CHARACTERISTICS

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

Student Handout #2 Using Abiotic and Biotic Parameters to Monitor Water Quality: A Field Experiment

May Biological and Habitat Study of the Olentangy River, 2005 and City of Delaware Dam Removals

Backyard STEM Project Area: Environmental Science

Kilkenny Central Access Scheme. Follow-up Aquatic Ecological Report

Question # The question The answer Bugs to use Fact or ID sheets Magnify? needed needed Difficulty

Environmental Review and Permitting for Wild Trout

Aquatic Monitoring Report

RAPID BIOASSESSMENT IN WADEABLE STREAMS & RIVERS BY VOLUNTEER MONITORS

Thunder Bay River Assessment

Aquatic Insects. Dayton Steelman Northwest Arkansas Master Naturalist

Neal D. Mundahl a & Ashley M. Hunt a a Department of Biology and Southeastern Minnesota Water. Available online: 10 Oct 2011

Susquehanna University and the PFBC Unassessed Waters Initiative in the Susquehanna Basin Jonathan M. Niles Mike Bilger

4-H Short Course Insect ID Contest Study Program Prepared by Dr. Jack Baldwin Extension Entomologist

Checklist (for turning in results)

Aquatic Insect Life Cycles

Taruarau River. Key Values. Table 1: List of documents reviewed. Cultural. Recreation (trout fishing) Ecology (aquatic biodiversity values)

Integrated Pest Management: Application in the Sea Lamprey Control Program

LIFE CYCLE AND COMMUNITY STRUCTURE OF CADDISFLIES (INSECTA:TRICHOPTERA) IN THE NAVASOTA RIVER, TEXAS.

Volume 15 Number 2 A Publication of Vanguard Chapter Trout Unlimited

A PROJECT OF THE ANN ARBOR CHAPTER OF MICHIGAN TROUT UNLIMITED

Appendix 1: Rivers and lakes with values requiring protection

Gray Fischer What s happening? Why has an emergency meeting of Yellowstone Park Watch been called? Maya, I see you re also here please fill me in!

Importance of Un-named tributaries to Brook Trout populations. Dr. Jonathan M. Niles

Pre-Treatment Assessment of Habitat and Biota. in the Knife River Mainstem, MN

BROOKIE NEWS. Newsletter of The Central Wisconsin Chapter of Trout Unlimited (CWTU) September 2014

Robert Weber PA Fish and Boat Commission Fisheries Biologist Fish Management Division

Wallowa Falls Hydroelectric Project FERC Project No. P-308 Updated Study Report (Final Technical Report) Aquatic Resources

RAMP Objectives. RAMP Studies

INCORPORATION OF STRESSED STREAM ANALYSIS INTO THE PROVIDENCE COLLEGE BIOLOGY CURRICULUM. Carol B. Crafts

Walker Creek Salmon Monitoring Program Watershed Map

The Streamkeepers Handbook

Water Quality Analysis of Total Phosphorus for the Lower Gunpowder Falls Watershed, Baltimore County, Maryland

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:697f481d-571a-4fe7-ad6a-1d6e3b4f5c93

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

July 17, Fish and Wildlife Resource Conservation Group Members Saluda Hydro Relicensing Team

Friends of the Rouge Benthic Macroinvertebrate Monitoring Program 2010 Annual Report for the Alliance of Rouge Communities

TROUT CREEK WATERSHED (Second Year of Snowline Data)

ECOLOGY AND GEOMORPHOLOGY OF STREAMS: THE SKEENA RIVER STUDY

Western Pocono Chapter. Trout Unlimited. 67 West Butler Drive fc ^

Job 4. Title: Evaluate performance of upstream and downstream plants.

What is an insect? An insect is an invertebrate (an animal with no spine) that has three pairs of legs and three

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT FEDERAL AID JOB PROGRESS REPORT F STREAM FISHERIES MANAGEMENT WESTERN REGION

Conserving the Forests, Lakes and Streams of Northeast Michigan

Chapter 5. Biological Monitoring

Columbia Basin Water Transaction Program. FY13 RM&E Habitat Monitoring Report. BPA Project #

Adams Chapter Update

SALMON RIVER WATERSHED RAPID BIOASSESSMENT SUMMARY REPORT 2008

UPPER GALLATIN TMDL PLANNING AREA BIOLOGICAL MONITORING

COLD WATER HABITAT EVALUATION PROJECT BLUE MOUNDS BRANCH WATERSHED FY Progress Report

Volume 33, Issue 03 March 2010

lodging and fishing opportunities for interested members, said Dave Carlson.

COLDWATER CONSERVATION CORPS. Advanced Monitoring Protocol. Macroinvertebrate Sampling And Assessment

More Than Just a Lake!

Rebirth of the Pigeon River: Song of the Morning Dam Removal Project

Unassessed Waters Initiative ( ) HOW CAN YOU HELP??

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

Virginia Save Our Streams. A biological assessment of stream quality

Rivers Of Sand: Fly Fishing Michigan And The Great Lakes Region By Josh Greenberg READ ONLINE

The Cove Run Brook Trout Restoration Project with the Northern Garrett High School AP Environmental Science Class,

Eastern Brook Trout Joint Venture Completed Project Report Form

Caddisfly Larvae Visual System: Response to Light

Wildlife Leadership Academy Instructor Directory

Aquatic Monitoring Report

Field Trip Report Caddisfly outbreak on the Colorado River below Davis Dam Laughlin NV / Bullhead City AZ

Positioning changes of mayfly nymphs due to behavioral regulation of oxygen consumption

AT THE HELM BY PRESIDENT LEPEAK

Bugs Give Some Clallam Streams Poor Grades Stream invertebrates show human impacts on health of local creeks

BASINWIDE ASSESSMENT REPORT WATAUGA RIVER BASIN

Transcription:

The Upper Manistee River Water Quality Monitoring Project collects benthic macroinvertebrates from five sites on the river, its branches and tributaries. Initiation of this project was a collaborative effort between The Upper Manistee River Association, Huron Pines, and the Paul H. Young Chapter of Trout Unlimited. Since 9, data have been collected from four sites in late spring (late May or early June) and fall (late September or October). A fifth site (Mecum) was added in 12. Methodology for sampling, collection and identification follows that of the Michigan Clean Water Corps (MiCorps) which is administered by the Great Lakes Commission and supported by the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality. The project is conducted by volunteers from throughout Michigan, and from all walks of life whose common interest is the health of the Upper Manistee watershed. A Stream Quality Index score () for each site is calculated using a MiCorps datasheet (see page 9). Benthic macroinvertebrates (bugs) are used as indicators of water quality, with different groups having different sensitivity thresholds. For instance, certain taxa (e.g., caddisflies, mayflies, stoneflies) are more sensitive to water quality and score higher. Taxa that can tolerate lower water quality score less. There are four categories, as indicated in the box to the right. Additional identification of specimens to Family level is undertaken and entered onto another datasheet (see pages and 11). This allows total numbers of taxa and EPTs (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera (Mayflies, Stoneflies, and ) to be determined and tabulated. All of the aforementioned data are then entered into the MiCorps database on their website (https://micorps.net/data/view/). = >48 = 34-48 = 19-33 = <19 A water quality monitoring project is also being undertaken on the AuSable River. For ease of comparison, the format of the tables and figures in this document will be similar to those in the AuSable River document. The contents of this document are as follows: Page 2: Averages of Stream Site Scores Page 3: Average number of taxa, and Average number of EPTs throughout collection history Page 4: Score by Collection Date - Goose Creek (Goose Creek at Goose Creek Road) Page 5: Score by Collection Date - Portage Creek (Portage Creek at Portage Creek Road) Page 6: Score by Collection Date - Mecum (North Branch at Mecum Road) Page 7: Score by Collection Date Thorsen (Manistee River at property formerly owned by Bob Thorsen) Page 8: Score by Collection Date Deward (Manistee River near Deward, MI) Page 9: MiCorps Identification and Assessment scoresheet Page : Benthic Macroinvertebrate Identification with Insect Families (page 1) Page 11: Benthic Macroinvertebrate Identification with Insect Families (page 2) 1

Upper Manistee River Water Quality Average Scores (9-16) Average of all sites TT EPT TT EPT 48.8 27.6 14.3 49.5 3.2 15.6 Goose 52.6 3.7 16.4 56.8 35.3 18.8 Portage 53.9 29.4 15.3 61.4 36.6 17.1 Mecum 45.1 23.6 11. 38.7 21. 11.2 Thorsen 54. 31.9 16.1 5. 29.4 16.1 Deward 38.2 21.4 11.7 41.6 25.4 13.1 = MiCorps Stream Quality Index score MiCorps average scores (9-16). Error bars represent one standard deviation. 7 6 5 4 3 Average of all sites Goose Portage Mecum Thorsen Deward 2

Average number of taxa (9-16). Error bars represent one standard deviation. Taxa Taxa # of Taxa 45 4 35 3 25 15 5 Average of all sites Goose Portage Mecum Thorsen Deward Average number of EPTs (9-16). Error bars represent one standard deviation. s EPTs EPTs 25 # of EPTs 15 5 Average of all sites Goose Portage Mecum Thorsen Deward 3

Goose Creek at Goose Creek Road TT EPT TT EPT Average 52.6 3.7 16.4 56.8 35.3 18.8 9 5.3 25 14 52.9 27 12 NS NS NS 54.2 32 19 11 42.6 23 13 51.9 3 16 12 61.8 4 19 61.9 34 18 13 51.7 3 18 63.9 41 14 54.7 3 16 58.7 4 25 15 58.7 36 17 52.6 37 16 48.6 31 18 58.5 41 = MiCorps Stream Quality Index score 7 6 5 4 3 Average 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 4

Portage Creek at Portage Creek Road TT EPT TT EPT Average 53.9 29.4 15.3 61.4 36.6 17.1 9 42. 26 15 62.1 32 13 NS NS NS 68.6 42 11 61.4 34 17 57.3 33 15 12 48.7 27 14 59.5 34 17 13 54.6 28 14 61.7 34 15 14 65. 34 17 57.2 34 17 15 54.3 3 16 58. 43 23 16 51.1 27 14 67. 41 17 = MiCorps Stream Quality Index score 7 6 5 4 3 Average 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 5

North Branch Manistee River at Mecum Road TT EPT TT EPT Average 45.1 23.6 11. 38.7 21. 11.2 12 53.7 26 44.3 24 12 13 41.3 28 19 56.6 32 16 14 54 29 11 31 15 7 15 41.4 17 6 28.9 15 11 16 35.1 18 9 32.7 19 = MiCorps Stream Quality Index score 7 6 5 4 3 Mean 12 13 14 15 16 6

Manistee River at Thorsen s TT EPT TT EPT Average 54. 31.9 16.1 5. 29.4 16.1 9 66.3 32 15 51.5 32 17 NS NS NS 52.7 28 14 11 55.6 34 18 41.8 24 14 12 4.6 26 17 51.8 28 16 13 47.4 28 15 6.8 35 17 14 64.7 43 18 48.6 32 19 15 51.5 33 16 47. 3 16 16 51.9 27 14 46. 26 16 = MiCorps Stream Quality Index score 7 6 5 4 3 Mean 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 7

Manistee River at Deward TT EPT TT EPT Average 38.2 21.4 11.7 41.6 25.4 13.1 9 47.6 26 11 38.6 23 14 NS NS NS 42.5 28 13 11 33 23 14 35.4 21 11 12 31.4 23 13 41.4 24 12 13 42.8 21 11 46.3 33 18 14 43.5 24 12 37.7 15 6 15 29.9 16 12 51.4 38 16 39 17 9 39.6 21 11 = MiCorps Stream Quality Index score 7 6 5 4 3 Mean 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 8

9

11