HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE STATUS American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates

Similar documents
University Of Maryland

FULL PROFILE Census, 2018 Estimates with 2023 Projections Calculated using Weighted Block Centroid from Block Groups Realm Realty Lat/Lon: 3

FOR LEASE HARMS ROAD INDUSTRIAL PARK Harms Road, Houston Texas 77041

Missing Opportunities: Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Twin Cities Metro in 2016

Oakmont: Who are we?

An American Profile: The United States and Its People

Not For Sale. An American Profile: The United States and Its People

2020 K Street NW, Suite 410 Washington, DC (202)

Update on the Assessment of Undergraduate Learning Outcomes Collegiate Learning Assessment B.4 B.5

WHERE ARE ARIZONA DEMOGRAPHICS TAKING US? HOW GROWING SLOWER, OLDER AND MORE DIVERSE AFFECTS REAL ESTATE

ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT REPORT COLLEGE PROFILE PHARMACY FALL 2017

The API Score discussed earlier is the variable that was explained. This measures the

TRENDS IN PARTICIPATION RATES FOR WILDLIFE-ASSOCIATED RECREATION BY RACE/ETHNICITY AND GENDER:

Texas Housing Markets: Metropolitan vs. Border Communities. September 22, 2014

More of the Same; Or now for Something Completely Different?

Report to the Benjamin Hair-Just Swim For Life Foundation on JACS4 The Jefferson Area Community Survey

Factors Associated with the Bicycle Commute Use of Newcomers: An analysis of the 70 largest U.S. Cities

A Sample of Economic & Demographic Characteristics for the Richmond-Petersburg Metropolitan Statistical Area (RIPE MSA) October 2004

City of El Centro Bicycle Master Plan October 2010

THE PLAZA ON FISHCREEK

Paddlesports Kayaking Canoeing. A Partnership Project of:

50 by 30 Live, Learn, Earn

ZONE ANALYSIS FOR BICYCLE PLANNING. Department of Transportation Safe Streets Division Bicycle & Pedestrian Program June 2018

Nebraska Births Report: A look at births, fertility rates, and natural change

ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS JANUARY 8, 2018 BOARD OF EDUCATION PRESENTATION JEFF CIMMERER CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER

New Data for Vermont and our Communities: A Focus on Programs of the U.S. Census Bureau Town Officer Education Seminars uvm.

A Sample of Economic & Demographic Characteristics for the Richmond-Petersburg Metropolitan Statistical Area (RIPE MSA) January 2006

South Carolina Communities That Care (SC CTC) Survey

DKS & WASHINGTON COUNTY Washington County Transportation Survey

Correlates of Nonresponse in the 2012 and 2014 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey

American River College Student Equity Disproportionate Impact Analyses Fall 2015

Nebraska s Population and Economic Trends

Demographic Characteristics and Trends of Bexar County and San Antonio, TX

The National Citizen Survey. Bowling Green, KY. Technical Appendices

Exhibit 1. National Health Expenditures per Capita,

Michigan Population Trends: The School Age Population

THE AP-GfK POLL July, 2016

National Association of REALTORS National Smart Growth Frequencies

Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Texas Volunteer and Donor Survey

Available +/- 26 Acres of Land Peachtree Industrial Boulevard & North Price Road Sugar Hill, Gwinnett County, GA 30518

Improving the Accuracy and Reliability of ACS Estimates for Non-Standard Geographies Used in Local Decision Making

Deaths in Hawaii Due to Congestive Heart Failure

The Wisconsin and Minnesota Economies: What can we learn from each other? Noah Williams

2017 North Texas Regional Bicycle Opinion Survey

Distributional National Accounts: Methods and Estimates for the United States

Deaths in Hawaii Due to Colon Cancer

It s the economy stupid!

Poisoned to Death. Christopher J. Ruhm. University of Virginia and NBER

Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Occupations in Allegheny County

Colorado Economic Update

U.S. Bicycling Participation Study

Bowling Green, KY Technical Appendices

Paddlesports. Kayaking Canoeing Rafting Stand up paddling. A Partnership Project of:

AAMPO Regional Transportation Attitude Survey

Graduate School Exit Survey Fall 2006 through Summer 2011

Figure 1a. Top 1% income share: China vs USA vs France

Medical and Dental Care in Hawaii

Georgia Annual Health Status Measures 2018

Fox Hollow Neighbourhood Profile

College/high school median annual earnings gap,

Graduate School Exit Survey Fall 2005 through Summer 2010

Utah s Demographic Transformation

NFL1. Do you think television shows, in general, are getting better or getting worse?

Prepared for: North Dakota Housing Finance Agency, Bismarck, ND, and its partners across the state of North Dakota

2014 Metro Transit Customer Survey Highlights

Prostate cancer prevalence (40+), for the State of Hawaii, for the Year(s)

Recreation. Participation. Topline Report

East London Neighbourhood Profile

Community & Transportation Preferences Survey

Americans in Transit A Profile of Public Transit Passengers

Sandra Nutter, MPH James Sallis, PhD Gregory J Norman, PhD Sherry Ryan, PhD Kevin Patrick, MD, MS

Travel and Rider Characteristics for Metrobus

Lookout Valley/Lookout Mountain

The Economic Status of Women in the U.S. What Has Changed in the Last Years

City of Frederick Bike Share Feasibility Study i

PHILADELPHIA HOUSE PRICE INDICES

Community Outreach Resource Center

PASSENGER SURVEY RESULTS

Hamilton Road Neighbourhood Profile

Wenlin Liu, Senior Economist. Stateof Wyoming. Economic Analysis Division State of Wyoming 1

Cobb Community Transit

Current Report: Community Profile Report of Congressional District: Texas's 25th District

The Outlook for Real Estate and Residential Construction. Patrick M. Barkey, Director Bureau of Business and Economic Research University of Montana

Hunter and Angler Expenditures, Characteristics, and Economic Effects, North Dakota,

GARDNER PLAZA AT ST. ROSE St Rose Parkway And Coronado Center, Henderson, NV ,361-21,860 SF OF RETAIL SPACE

THE KNOWLEDGE NETWORKS-ASSOCIATED PRESS POLL SPORTS POLL (BASEBALL) CONDUCTED BY KNOWLEDGE NETWORKS July 6, 2009

What HQ2 Finalist Cities Think about Amazon Moving to Town. Table of Contents

The North Shore Transportation Improvement Strategy and Western Richmond Terrace 1 : The Forgotten Corridor

Attitude towards Walk/Bike Environments and its Influence on Students Travel Behavior: Evidence from NHTS, 2009

Central London Neighbourhood Profile

Understanding the. Dr. Christopher Waller. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

School Report Card

Federal Safety Net Big Dollars. FederalSafetyNet.com

Jackson Neighbourhood Profile

Southcrest Neighbourhood Profile

1499 Easton Road 1499 Easton Road, Kintnersville, PA 18930

BICYCLE RESOURCE EQUITY IN CHICAGO

Westminster Neighbourhood Profile

PHILADELPHIA HOUSE PRICE INDICES

Population & Demographics

Transcription:

S2701 HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE STATUS 2014 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found on the American Community Survey website in the Data and Documentation section. Sample size and data quality measures (including coverage rates, allocation rates, and response rates) can be found on the American Community Survey website in the Methodology section. Although the American Community Survey (ACS) produces population, demographic and housing unit estimates, it is the Census Bureau's Population Estimates Program that produces and disseminates the official estimates of the population for the nation, states, counties, cities and towns and estimates of housing units for states and counties. Subject Total Number Percent Estimate Margin of Error Estimate Margin of Error Estimate Total civilian noninstitutionalized population 706,958 +/-1,082 81,550 +/-6,135 11.5% AGE Under 18 years 198,437 +/-237 8,380 +/-1,837 4.2% 18 to 64 years 427,177 +/-981 72,343 +/-5,458 16.9% 65 years and 81,344 +/-703 827 +/-459 1.0% 19 to 25 years 70,859 +/-1,959 16,127 +/-2,444 22.8% SEX Male 349,531 +/-1,020 46,774 +/-3,862 13.4% Female 357,427 +/-581 34,776 +/-3,069 9.7% RACE AND HISPANIC OR LATINO ORIGIN One Race 648,593 +/-6,343 74,622 +/-6,031 11.5% White alone 390,483 +/-10,173 39,407 +/-3,770 10.1% Black or African American alone 51,043 +/-2,065 5,954 +/-1,559 11.7% American Indian and Alaska Native alone 4,310 +/-1,175 639 +/-504 14.8% Asian alone 109,207 +/-2,523 10,989 +/-2,293 10.1% Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone 4,226 +/-257 695 +/-653 16.4% Some other race alone 89,324 +/-9,493 16,938 +/-3,427 19.0% Two or more races 58,365 +/-6,132 6,928 +/-2,027 11.9% White alone, not Hispanic or Latino 238,663 +/-1,216 13,757 +/-1,850 5.8% Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 286,486 +/-742 48,375 +/-4,595 16.9% NATIVITY AND CITIZENSHIP STATUS Native born 539,819 +/-7,048 42,464 +/-3,633 7.9% Foreign born 167,139 +/-7,100 39,086 +/-4,214 23.4% Naturalized 78,375 +/-5,523 7,481 +/-1,763 9.5% Not a citizen 88,764 +/-5,823 31,605 +/-3,716 35.6% EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 years and 436,526 +/-894 58,212 +/-4,427 13.3% 1 of 6 12/04/2015

Total Number Percent Estimate Margin of Error Estimate Margin of Error Estimate Less than high school graduate 98,083 +/-4,758 21,455 +/-3,038 21.9% High school graduate, GED, or alternative 120,387 +/-5,080 19,519 +/-2,723 16.2% Some college or associate's degree 137,164 +/-5,930 13,261 +/-2,043 9.7% Bachelor's degree or higher 80,892 +/-4,725 3,977 +/-1,046 4.9% EMPLOYMENT STATUS 508,521 +/-1,074 73,170 +/-5,542 14.4% In labor force 323,143 +/-5,386 52,952 +/-4,633 16.4% Employed 288,254 +/-5,395 42,085 +/-4,161 14.6% Unemployed 34,889 +/-2,857 10,867 +/-1,632 31.1% Not in labor force 185,378 +/-5,465 20,218 +/-2,474 10.9% WORK EXPERIENCE 508,521 +/-1,074 73,170 +/-5,542 14.4% Worked full-time, year round in the past 12 months 188,223 +/-5,352 23,146 +/-2,942 12.3% Worked less than full-time, year round in the past 12 133,525 +/-5,057 26,791 +/-3,070 20.1% months Did not work 186,773 +/-5,260 23,233 +/-2,400 12.4% HOUSEHOLD INCOME (IN 2014 INFLATION ADJUSTED DOLLARS) Civilian household population 700,243 +/-1,459 80,543 +/-6,295 11.5% Under $25,000 135,860 +/-9,452 21,800 +/-3,160 16.0% $25,000 to $49,999 152,448 +/-10,832 25,724 +/-3,856 16.9% $50,000 to $74,999 128,944 +/-11,532 15,598 +/-3,247 12.1% $75,000 to $99,999 96,855 +/-9,481 7,864 +/-1,958 8.1% $100,000 and over 186,136 +/-12,356 9,557 +/-2,783 5.1% RATIO OF INCOME TO POVERTY LEVEL IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS Civilian noninstitutionalized population for whom poverty 702,319 +/-1,518 81,323 +/-6,118 11.6% status is determined Under 1.38 of poverty threshold 209,848 +/-10,844 36,882 +/-4,338 17.6% 1.38 to 1.99 of poverty threshold 88,848 +/-9,730 14,843 +/-3,321 16.7% 2.00 of poverty threshold and over 403,623 +/-12,123 29,598 +/-4,295 7.3% HEALTH COVERAGE BY TYPE Private health insurance (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) Private health insurance alone (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) Employment-based health insurance (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) Employment-based health insurance alone (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) Direct-purchase health insurance (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) Direct-purchase health insurance alone (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) TRICARE/military health coverage (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) TRICARE/military health coverage alone (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) Public coverage (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) Public coverage alone (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) Medicare coverage (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) Medicare coverage alone (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) Medicaid/means-tested public coverage (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) Medicaid/means-tested public coverage alone (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) VA Health Care (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) VA Health Care alone (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) PERCENT IMPUTED Health insurance coverage 11.7% (X) (X) (X) (X) Private health insurance 11.1% (X) (X) (X) (X) 2 of 6 12/04/2015

Total Number Percent Estimate Margin of Error Estimate Margin of Error Estimate Employer-based health insurance 9.3% (X) (X) (X) (X) Direct-purchase health insurance 9.6% (X) (X) (X) (X) TRICARE/military health coverage 10.4% (X) (X) (X) (X) Public coverage 11.2% (X) (X) (X) (X) Medicare coverage 8.5% (X) (X) (X) (X) Medicaid/means-tested public coverage 9.9% (X) (X) (X) (X) VA Health Care 10.3% (X) (X) (X) (X) 3 of 6 12/04/2015

Percent Number Insured by Coverage Type Percent Insured by Coverage Type Margin of Error Estimate Margin of Error Estimate Margin of Error Total civilian noninstitutionalized population +/-0.9 625,408 +/-5,900 88.5% +/-0.9 AGE Under 18 years +/-0.9 (X) (X) (X) (X) 18 to 64 years +/-1.3 (X) (X) (X) (X) 65 years and +/-0.6 (X) (X) (X) (X) 19 to 25 years +/-3.3 (X) (X) (X) (X) SEX Male +/-1.1 (X) (X) (X) (X) Female +/-0.9 (X) (X) (X) (X) RACE AND HISPANIC OR LATINO ORIGIN One Race +/-0.9 (X) (X) (X) (X) White alone +/-0.9 (X) (X) (X) (X) Black or African American alone +/-2.9 (X) (X) (X) (X) American Indian and Alaska Native alone +/-10.1 (X) (X) (X) (X) Asian alone +/-2.1 (X) (X) (X) (X) Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone +/-15.4 (X) (X) (X) (X) Some other race alone +/-3.4 (X) (X) (X) (X) Two or more races +/-2.9 (X) (X) (X) (X) White alone, not Hispanic or Latino +/-0.8 (X) (X) (X) (X) Hispanic or Latino (of any race) +/-1.6 (X) (X) (X) (X) NATIVITY AND CITIZENSHIP STATUS Native born +/-0.7 (X) (X) (X) (X) Foreign born +/-2.3 (X) (X) (X) (X) Naturalized +/-2.1 (X) (X) (X) (X) Not a citizen +/-3.6 (X) (X) (X) (X) EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 years and +/-1.0 (X) (X) (X) (X) Less than high school graduate +/-2.7 (X) (X) (X) (X) High school graduate, GED, or alternative +/-2.0 (X) (X) (X) (X) Some college or associate's degree +/-1.4 (X) (X) (X) (X) Bachelor's degree or higher +/-1.3 (X) (X) (X) (X) EMPLOYMENT STATUS +/-1.1 (X) (X) (X) (X) In labor force +/-1.4 (X) (X) (X) (X) Employed +/-1.4 (X) (X) (X) (X) Unemployed +/-4.2 (X) (X) (X) (X) Not in labor force +/-1.3 (X) (X) (X) (X) WORK EXPERIENCE +/-1.1 (X) (X) (X) (X) Worked full-time, year round in the past 12 months +/-1.5 (X) (X) (X) (X) Worked less than full-time, year round in the past 12 +/-2.0 (X) (X) (X) (X) months Did not work +/-1.2 (X) (X) (X) (X) HOUSEHOLD INCOME (IN 2014 INFLATION ADJUSTED DOLLARS) Civilian household population +/-0.9 (X) (X) (X) (X) Under $25,000 +/-2.1 (X) (X) (X) (X) 4 of 6 12/04/2015

Percent Number Insured by Coverage Type Percent Insured by Coverage Type Margin of Error Estimate Margin of Error Estimate Margin of Error $25,000 to $49,999 +/-2.4 (X) (X) (X) (X) $50,000 to $74,999 +/-2.2 (X) (X) (X) (X) $75,000 to $99,999 +/-2.1 (X) (X) (X) (X) $100,000 and over +/-1.4 (X) (X) (X) (X) RATIO OF INCOME TO POVERTY LEVEL IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS Civilian noninstitutionalized population for whom poverty +/-0.9 (X) (X) (X) (X) status is determined Under 1.38 of poverty threshold +/-1.9 (X) (X) (X) (X) 1.38 to 1.99 of poverty threshold +/-3.0 (X) (X) (X) (X) 2.00 of poverty threshold and over +/-1.0 (X) (X) (X) (X) HEALTH COVERAGE BY TYPE Private health insurance (X) 400,418 +/-9,496 56.6% +/-1.4 Private health insurance alone (X) 329,115 +/-9,633 46.6% +/-1.4 Employment-based health insurance (X) 341,445 +/-9,685 48.3% +/-1.4 Employment-based health insurance alone (X) 292,838 +/-9,870 41.4% +/-1.4 Direct-purchase health insurance (X) 66,099 +/-5,029 9.3% +/-0.7 Direct-purchase health insurance alone (X) 33,107 +/-4,006 4.7% +/-0.6 TRICARE/military health coverage (X) 7,326 +/-2,286 1.0% +/-0.3 TRICARE/military health coverage alone (X) 3,170 +/-2,099 0.4% +/-0.3 Public coverage (X) 289,611 +/-9,224 41.0% +/-1.3 Public coverage alone (X) 202,507 +/-8,845 28.6% +/-1.2 Medicare coverage (X) 94,226 +/-2,427 13.3% +/-0.3 Medicare coverage alone (X) 24,290 +/-2,166 3.4% +/-0.3 Medicaid/means-tested public coverage (X) 218,730 +/-9,003 30.9% +/-1.3 Medicaid/means-tested public coverage alone (X) 176,774 +/-8,751 25.0% +/-1.2 VA Health Care (X) 8,784 +/-1,091 1.2% +/-0.2 VA Health Care alone (X) 1,443 +/-698 0.2% +/-0.1 (X) 81,550 +/-6,135 11.5% +/-0.9 PERCENT IMPUTED Health insurance coverage (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) Private health insurance (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) Employer-based health insurance (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) Direct-purchase health insurance (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) TRICARE/military health coverage (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) Public coverage (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) Medicare coverage (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) Medicaid/means-tested public coverage (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) VA Health Care (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted roughly as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables. The health insurance coverage category names were modified in 2010. See ACS Health Insurance Definitions for a list of the insurance type definitions. While the 2014 American Community Survey (ACS) data generally reflect the February 2013 Office of Management and Budget (OMB) definitions of metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas; in certain instances the names, codes, and boundaries of the principal cities shown in ACS tables may differ from the OMB definitions due to differences in the effective dates of the geographic entities. Estimates of urban and rural population, housing units, and characteristics reflect boundaries of urban areas defined based on Census 2010 data. As a result, data for urban and rural areas from the ACS do not necessarily reflect the results of ongoing urbanization. 5 of 6 12/04/2015

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2014 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates Explanation of Symbols: 1. An '**' entry in the margin of error column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute a standard error and thus the margin of error. A statistical test is not appropriate. 2. An '-' entry in the estimate column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute an estimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution. 3. An '-' following a median estimate means the median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution. 4. An '+' following a median estimate means the median falls in the upper interval of an open-ended distribution. 5. An '***' entry in the margin of error column indicates that the median falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution. A statistical test is not appropriate. 6. An '*****' entry in the margin of error column indicates that the estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate. 7. An 'N' entry in the estimate and margin of error columns indicates that data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small. 8. An '(X)' means that the estimate is not applicable or not available.