Florida s Intersection Safety Implementation Plan (ISIP)

Similar documents
FHWA Safety Performance for Intersection Control Evaluation (SPICE) Tool

Safety Emphasis Areas & Safety Project Development Florida Department of Transportation District Seven Tampa Bay

Acknowledgements. Mr. David Nicol 3/23/2012. Daniel Camacho, P.E. Highway Engineer Federal Highway Administration Puerto Rico Division

Engineering Countermeasures for Transportation Safety. Adam Larsen Safety Engineer Federal Highway Administration

CTDOT Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Initiatives

What Engineering Can Do for You! Low Cost Countermeasures for Transportation Safety

USDOT Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Initiative: Safer People and Safer Streets. Barbara McCann, USDOT Office of Policy

Guidelines for Integrating Safety and Cost-Effectiveness into Resurfacing, Restoration, and Rehabilitation Projects

Road Diets: Reconfiguring Streets for Multi-Modal Travel

Strategies for Making Multimodal Environments Safer. Kim Kolody Silverman, CH2M

Pavement Markings (1 of 3)

Performance-Based Approaches for Geometric Design of Roads. Douglas W. Harwood MRIGlobal 3 November 2014

Access Management in the Vicinity of Intersections

FDOT s Bicycle & Pedestrian Focused Initiative

Safety Corridors a Synthesis. Charlie Nemmers / Derek Vap University of Missouri

City of Albert Lea Policy and Procedure Manual 4.10 ALBERT LEA CROSSWALK POLICY

THE FUTURE OF THE TxDOT ROADWAY DESIGN MANUAL

Aging Driver and Pedestrian Safety: Human Factors Studies of Signs & Signals

Speed Management Action Plan

Chapter 5 DATA COLLECTION FOR TRANSPORTATION SAFETY STUDIES

Designing for Pedestrians: An Engineering Symposium. Rutgers University March 21, 2013

Geometric Categories as Intersection Safety Evaluation Tools

Collision Estimation and Cost Calculation

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

Toolbox of Countermeasures and Their Potential Effectiveness to Make Intersections Safer

10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE

FDOT Bicycle/Pedestrian Focused Initiative & Complete Streets

Integrating Safety into the Transportation Decision Making Process

Addendum to SDDCTEA Pamphlet 55 17: Better Military Traffic Engineering Revision 1 Effective: 24 Aug Crosswalk Guidelines

Lessons Learned from the Minnesota County Road Safety Plans. Richard Storm CH2M HILL

Application of Demographic Analysis to Pedestrian Safety. Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida

Proven Safety Countermeasures. FHWA Office of Safety January 12, :00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time

Abstract. Background. protected/permissive operation. Source: Google Streetview, Fairview/Orchard intersection

Document 2 - City of Ottawa Pedestrian Crossover (PXO) Program

Rebecca Szymkowski, P.E., PTOE Wisconsin Department of Transportation. ITE Midwestern District Annual Meeting June 30, 2015

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

CE576: Highway Design and Traffic Safety

INNOVATIVE INTERSECTION SOLUTIONS. Jay Bockisch, PE, PTOE Senior Associate

Effects of Traffic Signal Retiming on Safety. Peter J. Yauch, P.E., PTOE Program Manager, TSM&O Albeck Gerken, Inc.

TEXAS TRAFFIC SAFETY TASK FORCE. Jeff Moseley Texas Transportation Commission

Rational road safety management Practice and Theory. Bhagwant Persaud Ryerson University Toronto, Canada

Proposed: Temporary Traffic Management Design Guidance

FDOT Bicycle/Pedestrian Focused Initiative & Complete Streets

HSM PREDICTIVE METHODS IN PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING

FLORIDA STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN

RSA Efforts in the Tampa Bay Area

Small Town & Rural Multimodal Networks

VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN

Safety at Unsignalized Intersections. Unsignalized Intersections

Gordon Proctor Director Policy on Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel on ODOT Owned or Maintained Facilities

Roundabout Feasibility Memorandum

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Phase I-II of the Minnesota Highway Safety Manual Calibration. 1. Scope of Calibration

APPENDIX C. Systems Performance Report C-1

Relationship of Road Lane Width to Safety for Urban and Suburban Arterials

Systemic Safety. Doug Bish Traffic Services Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation March 2016

NCHRP Superelevation Criteria for Sharp Horizontal Curves on Steep Grades. Research Team: MRIGlobal Pennsylvania State University

CROSSING GUARD PLACEMENT CONSIDERATIONS AND GAP ASSESSMENT

Pedestrian Safety at Roundabouts

A Traffic Operations Method for Assessing Automobile and Bicycle Shared Roadways

Bicycle RSAs: How to Conduct Road Safety Audits and How to Use Them to Promote Bicyclist Safety. Dan Nabors, PE, VHB Bill DeSantis, PE, VHB

Safety Evaluation at Innovative Geometric Designs Gilbert Chlewicki, PE Advanced Transportation Solutions

California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

Roundabouts The Virginia Experience

Bicyclist Signing Guidelines

LANE ELIMINATION PROJECTS

Pedestrian Safety Action Plan Bicycle Safety Action Plan

Crash Data Analysis for Converting 4-lane Roadway to 5-lane Roadway in Urban Areas

PEDESTRIAN SAFETY IMPROVEMENT EVALUATION GUIDELINE FOR UNCONTROLLED CROSSINGS

Toward Zero Deaths. Regional SHSP Road Show Meeting. Virginia Strategic Highway Safety Plan. presented by

PennDOT ICE Policy An Introduction

Kansas Department of Transportation Strategic Highway Safety Plan. Intersections

Florida Transportation Commission. October 1, 2008

Hillsborough Pedestrian Safety Action Plan 2015 Update. Hillsborough MPO BPAC May 2015

In 2014, the number of traffic fatalities in the United States reached its lowest level at. Bicycle Collisions. Effective in Reducing

Making Great Urban Streets Confessions of a Highway Engineer. Timothy R. Neuman.. P.E. Chief Highway Engineer CH2M HILL

Railroad-Highway Grade Crossing Analysis for Corridor Planning Projects

Road Safety Assessments. Lt. Bob McCurdy Williamson County Sheriff s s Office Marion, IL.

Defining Purpose and Need

Innovative Intersections

Highway 111 Corridor Study

Crashes at Multilane Roundabouts and How to Reduce Them By Mehrdad Givechi, PE, PTOE

Institute of Transportation Engineers Safety Action Plan

Prediction of Pedestrian Crashes at Midblock Crossing Areas using Site and Behavioral Characteristics Preliminary Findings

CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS PEDESTRIAN CROSSING TOOLBOX

Preliminary Findings for Texas s North Central Texas Council of Governments Region

Michael D. Turpeau Jr. State Safety Program Supervisor Georgia Department of Transportation

REDUCING COLLISIONS AT HIGH CRASH LOCATIONS

Public Information Meeting. Orange Camp Road. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Beltway to I-4. Presented by: Volusia County August 2, 2018

appendix b BLOS: Bicycle Level of Service B.1 Background B.2 Bicycle Level of Service Model Winston-Salem Urban Area

RETREAT AGENDA ITEM MIDTOWN AREA TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE

RURAL HIGHWAY SHOULDERS THAT ACCOMMODATE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN USE (TxDOT Project ) June 7, Presented by: Karen Dixon, Ph.D., P.E.

We believe the following comments and suggestions can help the department meet those goals.

City of Saline. Complete Streets Ordinance

Residential Traffic Calming Program Guide. Town of Ashland, Virginia

RAMP CROSSWALK TREATMENT FOR SAN DIEGO AIRPORT, TERMINAL ONE

City of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A

BIKE PLAN CONTENTS GATEWAY

Existing Conditions. Date: April 16 th, Dan Holderness; Coralville City Engineer Scott Larson; Coralville Assistant City Engineer

Modern Roundabouts: a guide for application

Transcription:

Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION Florida s Intersection Safety Implementation Plan (ISIP) Alan El-Urfali, PE State Traffic Engineering and Operations Office March 28, 2017

Intersection Safety Implementation Plan Background What is an ISIP? ISIP Project Screening Process Proposed ISIP Systematic Implementation Intersection Control Evaluations (ICE) Design standards Discussion

Background Florida s Strategic Highway Safety Plan

Background From 2011 to 2015: 17% Increase in Fatalities 4% in Serious Injuries Intersections So why focus on intersections? Locations that pose the greatest risk to any user. The one place where all road users and vehicle types come together. A point of conflict that relies on signage, traffic control devices, roadway design and good behavior of users to operate safely. Pedestrians and bicyclists account for more than 17 percent of the fatalities at intersections. Intersections create risks for aging road users because as people age, there are declines in visual, cognitive, and physical abilities. 4

Background Moving towards a fatality-free roadway system requires reevaluating current process for determining intersection improvements. FDOT s Intersection Safety Coalition formed Implementation strategy identified: Reduce frequency & severity of intersection crashes by limiting conflicts through geometric, traffic control and lighting Institute Highway Safety Manual (HSM) analyses and road safety audits to make improvements for all users Use traditional and alternative designs & technologies to reduce conflict risks such as innovative intersection designs, access management and roundabouts Improve awareness and visibility of traffic control devices so all users can safely navigate intersections

What is an ISIP? Intersection Safety Implementation Plan (ISIP) identifies key steps, responsibilities, estimated funding requirements, and estimated injuries and fatalities prevented annually. The Florida ISIP will have: Intersection Control Evaluations (ICE) for top ranked intersections Selection of low-cost countermeasures Development new standards and guidelines

What is an ISIP? Intersection Control Evaluations (ICE) A new FDOT policy and procedure implementing a consistent and objective intersection evaluation process that is built upon performance-based criteria for determining the best value geometric design and traffic control for a given intersection/interchange. Planned to be adopted July 1, 2017

ISIP Project Screening Process Candidate Intersections are identified based on AASHTO Highway Safety Manual (HSM) methodologies Predictive method using network (statewide) screening process called Excess Expected Crash Frequency Intensive data collection effort Start with state highway system intersections first, then include off system, local intersections.

ISIP Project Screening Process Highway Safety Manual (HSM) AASHTO s guide for analyzing transportation safety Provides guidance on conducting predictive method crash analysis given various condition variables Includes Safety Performance Functions (SPFs) which help establish expected crash frequencies for given conditions/variables Used as a foundation for establishing ICE analysis tools and performance criteria 9

ISIP Project Screening Process Intersections will be grouped or categorized according to HSM criteria: Rural or Urban 2-lane or multi-lane Divided or undivided Signalized or stop control 3-leg or 4-leg Ranked based on highest crashes resulting from the Excess Expected Crash Frequency screening process

Proposed ISIP Implementation Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) Component: Top ranked intersections based on excess expected crash frequency Perform ICE for top ranked intersections Implement intersection improvements based on ICE results (Identified Innovative Intersection Control Types) Low Cost Improvements Component: Creating new design standards and guidelines Innovative signing and marking standards

Proposed ISIP Implementation Examples of Innovative ICE results: Result of ICE process will be a list of innovative intersection types that will be programed Most common innovative intersections: Roundabouts Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn (R-CUT) Displaced Left-Turn Diverging Diamond

Proposed ISIP Implementation Examples of Innovative ICE results: Roundabouts

Proposed ISIP Implementation Examples of Innovative ICE results: RCUT

Proposed ISIP Implementation Examples of Innovative ICE results: Displaced Left-Turn

Proposed ISIP Implementation Examples of Innovative ICE results: Diverging Diamond

Proposed ISIP Implementation Examples of Low-Cost Standards: Stop control enhancements (doubled up signage)

Proposed ISIP Implementation Examples of Low-Cost Standards: Led Blank-Out Signs

Proposed ISIP Implementation Examples of Low-Cost Standards: Intersection Conflict Warning Systems (ICWS)

Proposed ISIP Implementation Examples of Low-Cost Standards: Internally Illuminated Reflective Pavement Markers (IIRPM)

Proposed ISIP Implementation Examples of Low-Cost Standards: Flashing Yellow Arrow standards

Discussion Questions?