SUPERSTREETS IN TEXAS. ITS Texas Annual Meeting San Marcos, Texas Session 6A - Operations November 11, 2011

Similar documents
Superstreet Concepts & Application. Prepared by: PAPE-DAWSON ENGINEERS, INC. October 16, 2012

INNOVATIVE INTERSECTION DESIGN

THE FUTURE OF THE TxDOT ROADWAY DESIGN MANUAL

Practical Application of Turn Lane Design Criteria in Developing Suburban & Urban Corridors

Existing Conditions. Date: April 16 th, Dan Holderness; Coralville City Engineer Scott Larson; Coralville Assistant City Engineer

Innovative Intersections Presented by: Matt Crim P.E., PTOE Stantec Consulting Services Inc. October 29, 2015

I-35 COMAL COUNTY OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS

Intersection Improvement: Sturgeon Road, Silver Avenue and Murray Park Road Roundabout. Welcome. Public Information Session

Intersection of Massachusetts Avenue and Maple Street in Lexington Signalized Intersection and Roundabout Comparison

Agenda. Introduction to Roundabouts. Introduction to Roundabouts. Introduction to Roundabouts 6/6/2018

US 69 RELIEF ROUTE STUDY

Innovative Intersections

Access Management Regulations and Standards

Bay to Bay Boulevard Complete Streets Project

RM 620 FEASIBILITY STUDY

Public Information Meeting

Texas Intersection Safety Implementation Plan Workshop JUNE 2, 2016

Superstreets. A Tool for Safely and Efficiently Managing Congestion

FM 471 PROJECT. OPEN HOUSE FM 471 (Culebra Road) from SH 211 to Old FM 471 Medina and Bexar Counties. FM 471 Project

Project Goals and Objectives

DOWNTOWN TUPELO MAIN STREET: ROAD DIET STUDY

Offset Single Point Interchange I-25 at Rio Bravo Boulevard Albuquerque, New Mexico

Effects of Traffic Signal Retiming on Safety. Peter J. Yauch, P.E., PTOE Program Manager, TSM&O Albeck Gerken, Inc.

133 rd Street and 132 nd /Hemlock Street 132 nd Street and Foster Street MINI ROUNDABOUTS. Overland Park, Kansas

The Case for Roundabouts:

HOWDY! Victor M. Vargas P.E. Assistant Director of Transportation Operations - Austin District Texas Department of Transportation

Access Management Regulations and Standards

Safety Evaluation at Innovative Geometric Designs Gilbert Chlewicki, PE Advanced Transportation Solutions

FHWA Safety Performance for Intersection Control Evaluation (SPICE) Tool

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Enclosure 1. Crimson Drive Traffic Safety and Calming Review Report

Safety of U-turns at Unsignalized Median Openings

Best Practices for the Design and Operation of Reduced Conflict Intersections

Access Management Regulations and Standards for Minor Arterials, Collectors, Local Streets

ENHANCED PARKWAY STUDY: PHASE 2 CONTINUOUS FLOW INTERSECTIONS. Final Report

Traffic Signal Optimization Project (Hosman Road) (Future Coordinated Corridor)

Operation Green Light Traffic Signal Coordination Report North Oak Trafficway - New Mark Drive to NE 42nd Street

J Street and Folsom Boulevard Lane Conversion Project (T ) Before and After Traffic Evaluation

Draft North Industrial Area-Wide Traffic Plan

Project Report. South Kirkwood Road Traffic Study. Meadows Place, TX October 9, 2015

Traffic Circulation Study for Neighborhood Southwest of Mockingbird Lane and Airline Road, Highland Park, Texas

INNOVATIVE INTERSECTION SOLUTIONS. Jay Bockisch, PE, PTOE Senior Associate

Safety Impacts: Presentation Overview

A simulation study of using active traffic management strategies on congested freeways

Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis

Public Meeting. I-35 Corridor from John Kilpatrick Turnpike North to Waterloo Road October 26, 6:00pm Edmond Community Center Auditorium

KING STREET TRANSIT PILOT

HIGHBURY AVENUE/HAMILTON ROAD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE 1 MAY 14, 2015

Observations of Pedestrian Behavior and Facilities at Diverging Diamond Interchanges

Public Opinion, Traffic Performance, the Environment, and Safety After Construction of Double-Lane Roundabouts

Comparison of Turning Movement Count Data Collection Methods for a Signal Optimization Study. White Paper

Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

Joshua Saak, P.E., PTOE Traffic Design Engineer Ada County Highway District May 23, 2013

City of Wausau Wausau Center Urban Design and Transportation Master Plan. Design Workshop // October 18, 2018

Operational Comparison of Transit Signal Priority Strategies

Evaluation of Pavement Markings within the Dynamic Envelope

Operational Performance Comparison between Three Unconventional Intersection Designs: Left-turn Bypass, Diverging Flow and Displaced Left-turn

METHODOLOGY. Signalized Intersection Average Control Delay (sec/veh)

Highway 49, Highway 351 and Highway 91 Improvements Feasibility Study Craighead County

Appendix B. Safety Performance Report

Multimodal Transportation Plan

Access Management Benefits & Techniques. Access Management Workshop June 2, 2006

Road Diets FDOT Process

High Flow Multi-Lane Roundabouts

TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio

Pedestrian & Bicycle Safety Innovations & Applications

LESSONS LEARNED: ALTERNATIVE INTERSECTION AND INTERCHANGES

Proposed Action, Purpose and Need Technical Memorandum

FM 471. Open House Public Meeting FM 471

Figure 1: Vicinity Map of the Study Area

One-Way Street Movement vs. Two-Way Street Movement

KC Scout Kansas City s Bi-State Transportation Management Center

Roundabouts in Small-Medium Sized Communities: Why Consider Them?

Welcome! San Jose Avenue Open House August 25, 2015

Traffic Congestion in Houston. Presented by Bill King

NORTH TURNAROUND. Recommended Design: Expand the existing transit terminal

KC Scout Kansas City s Bi-State Transportation Management Center

Route 29 Corridor Assessment Update. Development of Possible Solutions

MoPac South: Impact on Cesar Chavez Street and the Downtown Network

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. North Harrison Street (Lee Highway to Little Falls Road) Comparative Analysis. Prepared for:

University of California, Davis Transit Signal Priority Implementation Study

MUTCD Part 6G: Type of Temporary Traffic Control Zone Activities

RAISED MEDIAN EFFECTIVENESS

Traffic Signal Design

Northbound San Jose Avenue & I-280 Off-Ramp Road Diet Pilot Project

CITY OF WEST LAKE HILLS. Forest View Neighborhood Traffic Calming Study

CITY OF FRANKLIN, TENNESSEE. Columbia Avenue. Widening & Improvements Project. Public Meeting May 16, 2017

Concurrent Monitoring, Analysis, and Visualization of Freeway and Arterial Performance for Recurring and Non-recurring Congestion

Corridor Studies. LA 415 and LA 73

SH-6 Corridor Improvement Study Policy Committee Progress Report M O N D AY, J U N E 1 0, B R A Z O S C E N T E R

Welcome. Thank you for your interest in the Lewis & Clark Viaduct Concept Study

BETHEL ROAD AND SEDGWICK ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY

I-95 Northbound at US 1 (Exit 126) Design and Study Final Report

Minutes - Standing Policy Committee on Public Works - January 13, 2003 REPORTS

Pearl Street / Prospect Street / Colchester Avenue Intersection Scoping Study. April 11, 2013 Steering Committee Meeting #3

Balancing Operation & Safety for Motorized and Non-Motorized Traffic

Characteristics of Fatal Pedestrian Crashes on Freeways. Kay Fitzpatrick Texas A&M Transportation Institute

122 Avenue: 107 Street to Fort Road

BENNING ROAD & BRIDGES TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS CRASH DATA AND SAFETY ANALYSIS TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM DRAFT MAY 2016

TRANSPORTATION FACILITY PLANNING Waugh Chapel Road Maytime Drive to New Market Lane

Transcription:

SUPERSTREETS IN TEXAS ITS Texas Annual Meeting San Marcos, Texas Session 6A - Operations November 11, 2011 1

Superstreet Corridor Location 2

3 US Highway 281 2007 Looking south above Evans Road, pm peak

Why? Traditional Intersection Traditional Intersections allow left-turns from all approaches and for simplicity 4 basic signal phases: 1. Left Turns on Major St 2. Throughs on Major St 3. Lefts on Cross St 4. Throughs on Cross St 4 While this provides freedom of movement it increases delay time and congestion. The intersection area is shared using time to separate the movements.

Innovative Intersections Innovative Intersections reduce the number of signal phases to increase operational efficiency by removing or redirecting some or all left-turns. Fewer signal phases = lower the delay to drivers. Innovative Designs also reduce the number of conflict points, increasing intersection safety. 5

6 What is a Superstreet - Superstreet Intersection, Restricted Crossing U-Turn (RCUT)

7 Superstreet Vehicle Movements

8 2-Lane Turnaround

9 2-Lane Turnaround

Intersection Safety Conflict Points Conventional Intersection Superstreet Intersection 10

Latest US 281 Superstreet Crash Data Before Jan 2007 June 2009 After Nov 2010 Sep 2011 Total Crashes 1,231 267 Number of Months 30 11 Average # per Month 41.0 22.3 (-45.8%) Fatals per month 0.1 0.0 Injury per month 12.0 9.5 (-20.8%) PDO per month 28.9 12.8 (-55.9%)

US 281 at Evans Road Evening Peak Before Condition 12

US 281 at Evans Road Evening Peak Superstreet 13

Advantages of Superstreet Intersections Improved Signal Progression along Main Road Travel Time Savings Reduced Emissions and Fuel Consumption Delay Savings Access Control Features Inherent in Design Reduction of Intersection Conflict Points Flexibility in Turnaround Location Relatively Simple Design Turn Lanes Traffic Signals 14

Superstreet Traffic Signal Efficiency Benefits Simple 2-phase Signals vs. Multi-phase = lower delay Conflicting Signal Movements Separated with Time and Space; not only time Less Lost Time per Cycle More Green Time for Main Street & Cross Street Movements Results in Two One-way Streets Much easier to progress traffic through green lights 15

Summary of US 281 Superstreet Benefits Fits in Existing Right-of-Way Safety Conflict Points Cut in Half Crossing Conflict Points Significantly Reduced Saves 1,050,852 Vehicle-hours per Year AM Peak 65 percent delay reduction PM Peak 73 percent delay reduction Saves 1,120,522 Gallons of Fuel per Year $24.6 Million in Benefits/year (Delay, Fuel, Stops) Construction Cost $5.2 Million One Year Benefit:Cost = 4.7 16

Potential Project Challenges Indirect Pedestrian Path Potential Driver Confusion Truck U-Turns Speeds Along Major Roadway Construction Phasing 17

ITS Elements IP Based Communication - Wireless Network IP - Conflict Monitor, Detectors, Controllers Radar Based Vehicle Detection on Major Roadway for Dilemma Zone Protection Radar Based Detection for Presence Detection Battery Backup Systems CCTV Cameras w/ PTZ Advanced Controllers But simplified Application 18

Actual Results Evening Peak Hour Traffic Volumes US 281 at Evans Road Before After (Superstreet) Northbound US 281 2,811 4,533 (61% increase) Southbound US 281 2,030 2,391 (18% increase) Eastbound Evans Road 674 671 (no change) Westbound Evans Road 567 495 (13% decrease) Total Intersecting Traffic 6,082 8,090 (33% increase) 19

Peak Hour Travel Time Between Lp 1604 & Bulverde Rd (6.1 mi.) Before* (min) Avg. Speed AM Southbound 23.3 15.7 mph PM Northbound 19.2 19.1 mph Goal (min) 20.0 12.2 After* (min) Avg. Speed 19.2 19.1 mph 12.7 28.8 mph % Improvement 19% 34% *Official travel time measurements gathered by TxDOT For comparison, Free Flow Travel Time (no traffic, no signals, at posted speeds) = 6.7 min (55 mph) 20

US 281 Observations Flow Rates for Northbound 281 at Evans in Evening Peak Before Superstreet Through vehicles = 850 vehicles per hour per lane After Superstreet Through vehicles = 1,500 vehicles per hour per lane >75% Increase in Flow Rate 21

Media Reports 22 22

Media Reports 23

Why A Superstreet? Low-cost improvement No additional through lane capacity No additional right-of-way needed Simple environment documentation and clearance process Improved traffic flow shows great return on investment (benefit:cost) Improved Safety Relatively quick construction 24

Where this concept is applicable Major signalized urban/suburban arterials Limited funding for major improvements Limited opportunity for right-of-way expansion Right-of-Way (150+ ft) Environmental concerns 25

Operational Superstreets in Texas US 281 North, San Antonio 3 RCUT + 1 MUT Lp 1604 West, San Antonio 2 RCUT + 1 MUT Design SH 71 at FM 973, Austin 2 RCUT Studies Underway in Austin & San Antonio Consideration in other areas

27 Lp 1604 at Shaenfield 1 of 3

28 Lp 1604 at Shaenfield 2 of 3

29 Lp 1604 at Shaenfield 3 of 3

Questions? Contact: Gilmer D. Gaston, P.E., PTOE Pape-Dawson Engineers, Inc. 555 E. Ramsey San Antonio, Texas 78216 T: 210-375-9000 e: ggaston@pape-dawson.com 30