SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF CRASHES IN LAS CRUCES

Similar documents
SAFETY PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND TARGET SETTING. Transportation Subcommittee September 15, 2017

We Count! Summer Report of the Inaugural Annual National Bicycle and Pedestrian Count for Las Cruces

Des Moines Area MPO Safety Performance Targets and Methodology

MESILLA VALLEY METROP

7/28/2017. Safety Performance Management: Target Setting and Coordination. Agenda. Safety Performance Management (SPM)

METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION SERVING LAS CRUCES, DOÑA ANA COUNTY, AND MESILLA

PRELIMINARY DRAFT FIRST AMENDMENT TO VISION 2050: A REGIONAL LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN

NMSU Red Light Camera Study Update

Safety Performance Management Target Setting. Data: Fatalities and Serious Injuries

National Performance Management Measures. April 20, 2016 Webinar

Attachment One. Integration of Performance Measures Into the Bryan/College Station MPO FY 2019 FY 2022 Transportation Improvement Program

Ongoing Challenges with Pedestrian Safety Data May 15: 10:15AM-11:45AM. PedsCount! 2014 May 14-16, 2014 Sacramento, CA

Iowa DOT FHWA Safety Targets

We believe the following comments and suggestions can help the department meet those goals.

APPENDIX F. Safety Planning. October 2018

METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION SERVING LAS CRUCES, DOÑA ANA COUNTY, AND MESILLA

Safety Corridors a Synthesis. Charlie Nemmers / Derek Vap University of Missouri

APPENDIX C. Systems Performance Report C-1

Bi-state metropolitan planning organization (MPO)

FHWA s Strategic Agenda for Pedestrian and Bicycle Transportation. Purdue Road School March 8, 2017

Bike/Multipurpose Trail Study for Glynn County, Georgia MAY 16, 2016

What is the problem? Transportation Safety Planning Purdue Road School. 42,636 Fatalities. Nearly 3M Injuries. Over 4M PDO crashes

Analyzing Spatial Patterns, Statistics Based on FAST Act Safety Performance Measures

SAFETY OF OUR STREETS

Colorado Department of Transportation Crash Data Program Alisa Babler, PE

Integrating Safety into the Transportation Decision Making Process

AMATS Complete Streets Policy

Improving the Process: How Statewide Organizations Are Winning Federal Dollars for Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects

Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning in a Historically Car-Centric Culture: A Focus on Connectivity, Safety, & Accessibility

FMATS Transportation Improvement Program Project Nomination Form

Safe Access to Transit:

Toward Zero Deaths. Regional SHSP Road Show Meeting. Virginia Strategic Highway Safety Plan. presented by

Lane Area Transportation Safety and Security Plan Vulnerable Users Focus Group

Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) 2014 Crash Data Report

MULTIMODAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT

CE576: Highway Design and Traffic Safety

The Traffic Monitoring Guide: Counting Bicyclists and Pedestrians. APBP 2017 June 28: 11:15am-12:45pm

Bus Rapid Transit on Silicon Valley s El Camino Real: Working Together to Create a Grand Boulevard Steven Fisher

IOWA HIGHWAY 58 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT STUDY PROJECT UPDATE NO. 1 OCTOBER 17, 2013

Systemic Safety. Doug Bish Traffic Services Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation March 2016

FLORIDA STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN

Welcome. Public Meeting. Heading 1. Heading 2. DeMers Ave. Columbia Rd. Washington St. 42nd St. 32nd Ave. Heading 3 HEADING

TEXAS TRAFFIC SAFETY TASK FORCE. Jeff Moseley Texas Transportation Commission

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLIST CRASH ANALYSIS 2015

Road Diets: Reconfiguring Streets for Multi-Modal Travel

ADOT Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase IV Activities APPENDIX B PEDESTRIAN DEMAND INDEX

HSIP Project Selection Criteria

DRIVING ZERO FATALITIES TO A REALITY ILLINOIS LOCAL SAFETY INITIATIVE

1 2 I N T R O D U C T I O 6 G E N E R A L I N F O R M A T I O N. Across. 6. Knowledge communicated in a brief overview

SUCCESFUL HSIP APPLICATIONS CUUATS & CHAMPAIGN COUNTY

FM 1092/Murphy Road Access Management Study Pulic Meeting #1. Wednesday, August 31, :00 p.m. 8:00 p.m.

DEVELOPMENT OF THE DES MOINES ACCESS MANAGEMENT PLAN

Final Project Prioritization Plan

Guidelines for Integrating Safety and Cost-Effectiveness into Resurfacing, Restoration, and Rehabilitation Projects

Volume Studies CIVL 4162/6162

7 Complete Streets & Roadway Aesthetics

Welcome to Laredo Metropolitan Transportation Plan First Public Meeting. February 27 th, :30 PM to 7:30 PM. We value your opinion!

REAL-TIME SYSTEM MANAGEMENT INFORMATION PROGRAM. Routes of Significance Memphis

Cycling and risk. Cycle facilities and risk management

Goal 3: Foster an environment of partnerships and collaboration to connect our communities and regions to one another.

Development of Criteria to Identify Pedestrian High Crash Locations in Nevada. Quarterly Progress Report. Submitted to

Table of Contents Kansas Highway Safety Improvement Program

VDOT BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE FOR LOCALITY INVOLVEMENT April 2017

Geometric Categories as Intersection Safety Evaluation Tools

Using GPS Data for Arterial Mobility Performance Measures

Section 8. Partnerships and Funding

Annual Crash Report. Valdosta-Lowndes County Metropolitan Planning Organization

Appendix T 1: Additional Supporting Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Performance Criteria for 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan

Texas Strategic Highway Safety Plan Update. 2 nd Emphasis Area Team Meeting Older Road Users 3/7/2017 Austin, TX

US 69 RELIEF ROUTE STUDY

How to Develop a Pedestrian Safety Action Plan

HSM Practitioners Guide to Urban and Suburban Streets. Prediction of Crash Frequency for Suburban/Urban Streets

Pedestrian Project List and Prioritization

MULTIMODAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT

5. Pedestrian System. Accomplishments Over the Past Five Years

Transportation Safety Planning at DVRPC

Bicycle/Bus Conflict Area Study

Phase I-II of the Minnesota Highway Safety Manual Calibration. 1. Scope of Calibration

Stakeholder Communication and Public Involvement Plan

The Pedestrian Safety Action Plan

City of San Diego Vision Zero Draft Strategic Plan FY 2017

Florida s Intersection Safety Implementation Plan (ISIP)

Effects of Traffic Signal Retiming on Safety. Peter J. Yauch, P.E., PTOE Program Manager, TSM&O Albeck Gerken, Inc.

CR 30 / CR 11 and CR 30 / CR 11C Intersection Improvement Project. What Should We Build?

BIKE & PEDESTRIAN IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE FOR LOCALITY INVOLVEMENT. November 2006

2014 STATE OF THE SYSTEM REPORT

INDOT Complete Streets Guideline & Policy

SR 693 (Pasadena Avenue) Corridor Study from Shore Drive South to 66 th Street

Pedestrian injuries in San Francisco: distribution, causes, and solutions

CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action

CITY OF FRANKLIN, TENNESSEE. Columbia Avenue. Widening & Improvements Project. Public Meeting May 16, 2017

Designing for Pedestrians: An Engineering Symposium. Rutgers University March 21, 2013

2015 Florida Main Street Annual Conference. Complete Streets Equal Stronger Main Streets

Institute of Transportation Engineers Safety Action Plan

Bicycle and Pedestrian Connectivity Study Phase 2

Welcome! Urban Work Zone Design. Training Course 0-1

USDOT Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Initiative: Safer People and Safer Streets. Barbara McCann, USDOT Office of Policy

Transcription:

SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF CRASHES IN LAS CRUCES

Purpose The purpose of this project was to identify and analyze areas within the Las Cruces urbanized area that are experiencing recurring patterns of crashes, specifically those that occur at signalized intersections. Included was analysis of the conditions that might contribute to said crashes. Using the information gained from this study, along with a general understanding of crash trends, we can begin to make recommendations regarding safety needs and improvements to minimize the potential for crashes. The Federal Highway Administration recently released safety performance measure guidelines and this work is part of our effort to comply with those guidelines.

Overall Procedure This analysis examines the years 2012, 2013, and 2014. The specific areas of the analysis were the 121 signalized intersections located within the Las Cruces urbanized area. Finally, Staff combined the resulting data with the AADT traffic volumes in order to calculate the intersection crash rate. The intersection crash rate is a useful tool examine the relative safety of an intersection beyond just the raw crash total.

AADT and Intersection Crash Rate AADT stands for Annual Average Daily Traffic. This is the average volume of traffic flowing over a particular road segment. This is data obtained from the MPO traffic count program Intersection Crash Rate is used to measure the number of crashes controlling for the number of entering vehicles. It is calculated as follows Volume is calculated by the dividing the sum of the AADT s of each of the legs at a particular intersection

Terminology Property Damage Only crashes are crashes that involve damage only to any of the vehicle Injury Crashes are crashes that involve personal injury to any of the parties involved Fatal crashes are crashes that result in the death of at least one of the parties involved

Results

INTERSECTION Top 25 Property Damage Only Crashes 2012-2014 Lohman & Roadrunner Solano & Spruce Boutz & Valley Amador & Valley Missouri & Triviz Avenida De Mesilla & Valley Solano & University Idaho & Solano El Paseo & Union & University Avenida De Mesilla & Idaho & Main Avenida De Mesilla & Hickory Locust & University Boutz & El Paseo & Missouri Main & Valley Bataan Memorial West & Del Rey Lohman & Walnut Spruce & Triviz El Paseo & Idaho Triviz & University Main & Solano & Spitz Picacho & Valley Main & Picacho Lohman & Walton Elks & Main & Triviz Lohman & Telshor 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 NUMBER OF CRASHES

INTERSECTION Top 25 Injury Crashes 2012-2014 Main & Union Madrid & Main Don Roser & Las Alturas & University Amador & Valley Idaho & Solano El Paseo & Idaho Alameda & El Paseo & Main Solano & Spruce Avenida De Mesilla & Valley Lohman & Solano Triviz & University Boutz & El Paseo & Missouri Missouri & Triviz Spruce & Triviz Amador & Main Amador & Solano Main & Valley Lohman & Telshor Foothills & Lohman Elks & Main & Triviz Picacho & Valley Main & Solano & Spitz Bataan Memorial West & Del Rey Lohman & Walnut Lohman & Walton 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 NUMBER OF CRASHES

INTERSECTION Top 25 Fatal Crashes 2012-2014 Triviz & University 0 1 NUMBER OF CRASHES

INTERSECTION Bicycle Involved Crashes 2012-2014 Madrid & Solano 2 Avenida De Mesilla & Calle Del Norte El Paseo & Wyatt Alameda & Picacho Spruce & Triviz Amador & Motel Solano & University Hoagland & Valley Don Roser & Las Alturas & University Lohman & Solano Amador & Main Alameda & Amador Boutz & El Paseo & Missouri Amador & Valley Madrid & Main Main & Union Bamert & Picacho & Shalem Colony Locust & Missouri Idaho & Solano Missouri & Triviz Lohman & Walnut Locust & University Lohman & Walton Alameda & Lohman Stern & Union Alameda & El Paseo & Main 0 1 2 NUMBER OF CRASHES Bicycle Involved Crashes Stats and Factors

INTERSECTION Pedestrian Involved Crashes 2012-2014 Mesquite & Spruce Camino Del Rex & El Camino Real & Main Amador & Campo Solano & University Hoagland & Valley Del Rey & Northrise & Telshor Carver & Main Las Cruces & Water Bataan Memorial West & Del Rey Main & Union Foothills & Lohman Lohman & Roadrunner El Paseo & Idaho Avenida De Mesilla & Hickory Missouri & Triviz Lohman & Walnut Avenida De Mesilla & Valley Lohman & Walton Hadley & Valley Locust & University Pedestrian Involved Crashes Stats and Factors 0 1 2 3 NUMBER OF CRASHES

Federal Requirements As of this year, as part of the FAST Act, FHWA now requires State DOTs and MPOs to set Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) targets for 5 safety performance measures: 1. Number of fatalities 2. Rate of fatalities 3. Number of serious injuries 4. Rate of serious injuries 5. Number of non-motorized fatalities and non-motorized serious injuries

MPO Tasks MPOs have the option to plan and program projects so they contribute to the accomplishment of State DOT HSIP targets or committing to a quantifiable HSIP target for the MPO area. If an MPO agrees to support State HSIP targets, the MPO would: Work with State and safety stakeholders to address areas of concern Coordinate with the State to include the HSIP performance measures in the MTP Integrate into the metropolitan planning process the performance measures included in all other relevant State documents Include a description in the TIP of the anticipated effect of the TIP toward achieving HSIP targets in the MTP, linking investment priorities in the TIP to the safety targets If an MPO establishes its own HSIP target, the MPO would: Establish HSIP targets for the MPO area Estimate vehicle miles traveled (VMT) for the MPO area Include HSIP performance measures in the MTP Integrate into the metropolitan planning process the performance measures included in all other relevant State documents Include a description in the TIP of the anticipated effect of the TIP toward achieving HSIP targets in the MTP, linking investment priorities in the TIP to the safety targets

MPO Tasks MPO Staff must expand the geographic scope of the analysis and will have to apply Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) considerations. Over the coming months, the MPO will have to determine whether it will support the NMDOT HSIP target or whether it will establish its own HSIP targets.

Questions and Info Tom Murphy, MPO Officer Andrew Wray, Transportation Planner Michael McAdams, Transportation Planner Dominic Loya, Acting Planning Technician Marcus Lopez, Co-Op Cody Sensiba, Co-Op 700 North Main P.O. BOX 20000 Las Cruces, NM 88001 Phone: (575) 528-3043 http://mesillavalleympo.org For more information about the Transportation Planning Process for the Mesilla Valley MPO: http://mesillavalleympo.org/mpo-documents-resources/