Maui Development Limited. Transitional disclosure of pipeline capacity

Similar documents
Connecting Coal Bed Methane to the NTS. Transmission Workstream 1 st July 2010

Annual Price Review Gas transmission network. From 1 October 2014

Gas Quality Requirements and Procedures. Date issued: June 2015

TESTIMONY OF ROBERT C. KOTT ON BEHALF OF THE CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR CORPORATION

Recommendation to the Minister of Energy by the Gas Industry Co on the Specification for Reticulated Natural Gas

STTM EVENT: CONTINGENCY GAS TRIGGER GAS DAY 1 OCTOBER 2016 AT SYDNEY HUB

2013 Special Reliability Assessment: Accommodating an Increased Dependence on Natural Gas for Electric Power

2016 Electric Resource Plan Modeling Assumptions Update

Natural Gas Connection Policy and Procedures

INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT. (UK-CONTINENT INTERCONNECTOR) Amended and Restated (25 th September 2015) between NATIONAL GRID GAS PLC.

Gas Disruption Scenarios

Order No. 55/18 CENTRA GAS MANITOBA INC.: PRIMARY GAS RATE APPLICATION, EFFECTIVE MAY 1, April 26, 2018

M A N I T O B A ) Order No. 123/13 ) THE PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD ACT ) October 22, 2013

Portuguese Market Outlook up to 2040

ONSHORE GAS GATHERING FAQS

Interconnected Party (IP) Rights and Obligations. In relation to Interconnection Agreements (ICAs), the Final Assessment Paper (FAP) determined that:

IMPACT & IMPLEMENTATION REPORT SUMMARY SECTION (For AEMO to complete and administer)

Gas Outage and Contingency Management Arrangements

Gas Transportation Planning System in the Department of Economy of Gazprom

* William A. Sala, Jr. John A. Roscher. Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC * Sorana Linder 700 Louisiana Street, Suite 700 Director, Regulated Services

Metering Code Gas TSO, measurement by connected party Effective from to the present

Memorandum INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY. Smart Growth. Bruce Robinson, Transport Advisor, Infrastructure Planning

Transient Analysis of a Complex Network of Gas Pipeline Compulsory in the Design by Dynamic Simulation

Safety Manual VEGAVIB series 60

Goldfields Gas Pipeline Access Arrangement Comments on Pipeline Capacity Modeling and the Impact of Changing Gas Quality

What is LPG? Released Energy in the narrowest area. Clean and sure in the practise

System Operating Limit Definition and Exceedance Clarification

FINAL FACILITY STUDY. KV1C Transformer Addition at Badwater Substation 2009-T1. November 17, 2009

Please read this document of Terms and conditions carefully so that you fully understand our responsibilities and your commitments.

Network Transmission System Gas Supply Emergency / Gas SCR Overview. Jenny Phillips

Transmission pricing and contentious cost (risk) allocation issues

Micro Motion 3098 Gas Specific Gravity Meter

MAINTENANCE AND SAFETY OF CNG REFUELLING STATIONS

No. ONGC/EOI/GAS/NELP/CY-ONN /2018 Date:

AB AMBER GRID RULES FOR NATURAL GAS TRANSMISSION SYSTEM BALANCING I. GENERAL PROVISIONS

2017 LGA 191/192 & 195 Pipeline Safety Conference

Customer Service and Operations Committee. Board Action Item III-A. February 12, 2015

2013 Integrated Resource Plan September 24, 2012

MoPac South: Impact on Cesar Chavez Street and the Downtown Network

WSI Managing Director s Annual Report to AGM (Slide #1 - Operational overview) As noted by the Chairman, WSI had a record year in 2010/11.

STCP 08-2 Issue 004: Circuit Live Trip & DAR Tests

SILK ROAD ENTERTAINMENT, INC. (A Development Stage Company) UNAUDITED BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 2018 ASSETS. CURRENT ASSETS: Cash $ 93,218

Gas Gathering System Modeling The Pipeline Pressure Loss Match

Amendment to Gas Quality NTS Entry Specification at the St Fergus NSMP System Entry Point

Safety Monitor Requirements. September 2012

Reliability Coordinator Procedure

Safety Monitor Requirements Revised. February 2018

FIL World Lacrosse Championship 2010

TEN-YEAR DEVELOPMENT AGENDA FOR THE TIGF TRANSPORT GRID ( ) Gas consultation 24 October 2017

Overview of Assumptions

Taranaki Tsunami Inundation Analysis. Prepared for Taranaki Civil Defence Emergency Management Group. Final Version

PIG MOTION AND DYNAMICS IN COMPLEX GAS NETWORKS. Dr Aidan O Donoghue, Pipeline Research Limited, Glasgow

AB AMBER GRID RULES FOR NATURAL GAS TRANSMISSION SYSTEM BALANCING I. GENERAL PROVISIONS

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE FIFTH REGULAR SESSION August 2009 Port Vila, Vanuatu

FAQs about Directive 017

NZQA registered unit standard version 1 Page 1 of 5. Meet requirements for Approved Filler Test Certificate for refrigerants

Author s Name Name of the Paper Session. Positioning Committee. Marine Technology Society. DYNAMIC POSITIONING CONFERENCE September 18-19, 2001

Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No.

Wind and Tidal - Benefits and Opportunities in Australia

District Cooling System at Kai Tak Development Content

acculink platinum zv zoning system

current supply and what is needed for future conditions; this is not the total water demand for these utilities.

Gas Interruptions. customer guide

Gas Pressures FAQs. Why only 19 mbar inlet pressure and 15 mbar outlet pressure? MOV: meter outlet valve ECV: emergency control valve

System Flexibility Indicators

European Commission. Harmonisation of BCS: Aggregation methods (business surveys) and Quality checking (consumer survey)

SPECIFICATION FOR INSTALLATION OF RAISED PAVEMENT MARKERS. This specification shall apply to the installation of raised pavement markers.

Gripping rotary modules

WildCat RF unit (0.5W), full 32-byte transmissions with built-in checksum

Dieter Krenz, Linde, Germany, Manel Serra, Inprocess, Spain, and. Theron Strange, Simplot Phosphates, USA, discuss dynamic process simulation

Pacific Gas and Electric Company Monthly Report On Interruptible Load and Demand Response Programs for June 2012

Refining Industry Outlook

RULES RELATING TO TRACKSIDE BETTING TRANSACTIONS IN THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY

Optimizing Compressed Air Storage for Energy Efficiency

OPTION 1: TWO-RUNWAY SYSTEM

Vaporizer Technique. FAS Flüssiggas-Anlagen GmbH

Gas System Operator Incentives Initial Proposals Consultation 2011/12

HAP e-help. Obtaining Consistent Results Using HAP and the ASHRAE 62MZ Ventilation Rate Procedure Spreadsheet. Introduction

AC or DC Transmission for a Remote Wind Farm?

Project Mobility - Route 3 South Express Toll Lanes. Industry Day Overview

CIRCLE DRIVE TRAFFIC AND ACCESS MANAGEMENT POLICY GUIDE. Management Principles and Implementation Concepts

REPORT General Committee

QLDC Council 29 October Report for Agenda Item: 3

METHODOLOGY. Signalized Intersection Average Control Delay (sec/veh)

MARINE NOTICE MARINE NOTICE. Marine Notice 11/2012 Supersedes 15/2010 and 7/2012. Guidance on ECDIS for ships calling at Australian ports 11/2012

Copyright Thames Water Utilities Ltd Alternative water supplies policy.

Transmission Expansion Advisory Committee Meeting Market Efficiency Analysis Input Assumptions. April 12, 2012

September 8, Transmission Congestion and Resource Adequacy Analysis

Fahmida Ahmed Director, Office of Sustainability Department of Sustainability & Energy Management Stanford University

WINDSPEED. Resultat og erfaringer med MSP. 26. september 2013 Hans Chr. Sørensen, SPOK ApS. Contract number: EIE/07/759/S

Optimizing Compressor Design for Complex Reciprocating Compressor Installations Presented at the 2006 Gas Machinery Conference in Oklahoma City

All TSOs of the Nordic Capacity Calculation Region Proposal for fallback procedures in accordance with Article 44 of Commission Regulation (EU)

INSTALLATION, OPERATION AND SERVICE MANUAL ABS AIR BAG LIFT

POLICY GUIDE. DataCore Cloud Service Provider Program (DCSPP) DCSPP OVERVIEW POLICY GUIDE INTRODUCTION PROGRAM MEMBERSHIP DCSPP AGGREGATORS

Truck Climbing Lane Traffic Justification Report

It Was Never Going To Be Easy

MOANA NEW ZEALAND & SANFORD MĀUI DOLPHIN PROTECTION PLAN

Tuas Power Supply. Gas Retailer Handbook

DYNAMIC LANES FOR AUCKLAND

RESIDENTIAL WATER DISTRIBUTION

Transcription:

Maui Development Limited Transitional disclosure of pipeline capacity May 2013

Transitional disclosure of pipeline capacity This document covers our transitional disclosure of transmission system capacity for the year ending 31 December 2012, as required by clause 2.12.2(2) in the Gas Transmission Information Disclosure Determination 2012 (ID Determination) issued by the Commerce Commission. The terms MDL, we, us and our in this document refer to the Gas Transmission Business of Maui Development Limited. Our assessment of the extent to which our physical pipeline capacity is adequate to address the current and anticipated future needs of our consumers, taking into account our expected demands and investment plans, is presented below. 1. Analysis of available capacity An analysis of the available capacity for each offtake point with a throughput of gas during the System Peak Flow Period (in respect of the 12 months ended 31 December 2012) of 2,000 GJ or more is set out below. GJ / Offtake Point South of Mokau System Peak Flow Period Peak Throughput Maximum Capacity Factor Methanex Scenario Assumed Throughput Maximum Capacity Factor Frankley Road 65,864 355,666 5.4 55,864 318,425 5.7 Bertrand Road 46,382 282,930 6.1 102,382 327,622 3.2 Ngatimaru Road (DP) 101,736 356,076 3.5 101,736 335,729 3.3 North of Mokau Pokuru 11,427 96,539 8.4 11,427 96,539 8.4 Rotowaro 165,304 250,416 1.5 165,304 250,416 1.5 Huntly Power Station 66,359 151,471 2.3 66,359 151,471 2.3 This analysis presents throughput and maximum capacity, and the multiplication factor between them, for those offtake points for two cases: 1. The System Peak Flow Period as presented in our transitional disclosure of peak flow information, dated 27 February 2013, for the 12 months ending on 31 December 2012. The System Peak Flow Period was the period of 24 consecutive hours beginning at 0000 hours (New Zealand Standard Time) on 18 July 2012. 2. A possible scenario in which Methanex would have increased its offtake at Bertrand Road by 56 TJ per day (as a result of additional demand at the Waitara Valley Methanol Plant) during the System Peak Flow Period. Capacity modelling was carried out using Stoner SynerGee Gas, version 4.4.2, written by Advantica of the USA. The software is licensed to Vector. Details of the Maui pipeline and its intake points and offtake points are presented in the attached Schedule A. The input assumptions for the capacity modelling are as follows. Throughputs for all offtake points in the system (other than the points presented in the table) are based on actual flows during the System Peak Flow Period. Intake and offtake throughputs at the Frankley Road bi-directional point are netted off against each other. Maui Development Limited Page 1

Failure trigger constraints for every scenario are pressure drops below: 42 bar at Bertrand Road, 32 bar at Rotowaro, or 32 bar at any offtake point south of the Mokau compressor station. Flows through the Mokau compressor station are constrained to a maximum of 330 TJ per day. This is based on an assumption of using only one compressor unit (of two available), with a 3 MW power threshold and maintaining an outlet pressure of 56 bar. It also allows for the system line pack required for flexibility and survival time. The 330 TJ constraint has not been converted to an hourly flow limit (i.e. 330/24), but is used in aggregate for the full day of the System Peak Flow Period. All of the intake points have their own composition associated with the gas they supply into the system. Those gas compositions are based on the same values as during the peak period for the year ending 31 December 2011. The model assumes an average constant gas temperature of 12.3 C. All modelling is based on actual physical gas flows. The Maui Pipeline operating regime does not provide for fixed capacity reservations. All flows are interruptible. Throughputs at each intake point (including the net intake quantity for the bi-directional point at Frankley Road) are as set out in the table below. The Methanex Scenario assumes that the additional 56 TJ offtake at Bertrand Road is provided by an additional 10 TJ from Oaonui, 36 TJ from #2, and 10 TJ taken from Frankley Road. The latter reduces the net offtake from Frankley Road. System Peak Flow Period Methanex Scenario GJ / Intake Point Peak Throughput Assumed Throughput Oaonui 134,136 144,136 Frankley Road 0 (10,000 extra netted off) 71,386 71,386 #2 23,604 59,604 Kowhai 0 0 Ngatimaru Road (RP) 157,885 157,885 Turangi Mixing Station 28,210 28,210 In all cases, the maximum capacity for an offtake point is modelled by allowing one of the intake points to increase its flow to a possible maximum while operating within minimum pressure constraints at all other points (and keeping all other points at the same flow patterns). The maximum capacity presented for an offtake point is the minimum result obtained from all modelled cases. (As a counter example, the maximum capacity for the Ngatimaru Road Delivery Point reaches extremely high numbers if the extra gas is assumed to come from the Ngatimaru Road Receipt Point.) This leads to the following key results. 1. For all offtake points south of the Mokau compressor station, the limiting intake point is Oaonui. In other words, if additional gas were taken from other intake points (which are closer by), the maximum offtake capacity would be higher than presented above. In all those cases, including the Methanex Scenario, the failure mechanism is a pressure drop below 42 bar at Bertrand Road. 2. For all offtake points north of Mokau, the intake point is irrelevant. In other words, results are the same for all intake points. In all those cases, the limiting constraint is the assessed maximum throughput of 330 TJ at the Mokau compressor station. Maui Development Limited Page 2

2. Constraints and planned investments South of Mokau Results of the modelling indicate that for expected receipt and delivery patterns the Maui Pipeline does not have any significant capacity constraints for offtake points south of the Mokau compressor station. Modelling results show that for gas coming from Oaonui, the pipeline could have delivered at least 236 TJ more on the day of the System Peak Flow Period (225 TJ in the Methanex Scenario). Maximum offtakes could even be several times larger for gas coming from intake points further North. For example, modelling results show that net offtakes at Frankley Road could have increased to at least 856 TJ (821 TJ in the Methanex Scenario) for gas from intake points other than Oaonui. Bertrand Road and the Ngatimaru Road Delivery Point could have supported even greater increases. Nevertheless caution needs to be exercised in interpreting modelling results for very large capacity increases. We are not aware of any potential consumption patterns south of the Mokau compressor station that will reach such levels. As a result, we do not see any potential need for, and have not considered, capacity investments south of the Mokau compressor station. North of Mokau For more northern offtake points, the maximum throughput of the Mokau compressor station itself becomes the constraint on delivery capacity. A chart presenting aggregate offtakes north of Mokau is presented below. The assessed capacity constraint of 330 TJ at Mokau was exceeded on 6 days in 2007. Flows north of Mokau have been lower since then and the assumed constraint has not been exceeded again in later years. The North of Mokau peak during 2012 was at 265 TJ on 3 May. Maui Development Limited Page 3

It is important to note that the assumed throughput limit of 330 TJ per day at Mokau is based on actual performance in 2007 and is a reasonable estimate of delivery capacity under normal pipeline conditions using only the Unit 2 compressor. This limit also assumes the provision of contingency volume to stay above the pressures that would activate the Critical Contingency Regulations as well as the flexibility line pack provided under the MPOC. MDL does not have plans for capital investment to increase throughput capacity at Mokau. 3. Impact of constraints on consumers We do not believe that transmission system constraints on the Maui Pipeline are impacting upon the quality of service provided to any existing consumer of MDL s gas transmission services. 4. Certification The required certification for this disclosure is attached. Maui Development Limited Page 4

Schedule A Maui Pipeline Intake and Offtake Points A map showing the location of the Maui pipeline is presented below. Maui Development Limited Page 5

Details of the intake and offtake points on the Maui Pipeline are presented below. INTAKE POINT OFFTAKE POINT STATION NUMBER LOCATION NZMS 260 GRID REF. Oaonui Frankley Rd #2 Kowhai Ngatimaru Rd (receipt) Turangi Mixing Station 4000000 4000439 4000688 4000688 4000688 4000670 4000710 S.H.45 Frankley Rd Ngatimaru Rd Ngatimaru Rd Ngatimaru Rd Ngatimaru Rd Rd East Oaonui New Plymouth P20 873199 P19 012304 Q19 209393 Q19 209393 Q19 209393 Q19 210393 Q19 246411 Opunake 4000001 S.H.45 Oaonui P20 804002 Pungarehu 4000132 Parihaka Rd Pungarehu P20 848122 Okato 4000231 Oxford Rd Okato P19 877212 Oakura 4000351 Wairau Rd Oakura P19 934300 Frankley Rd 4000439 Frankley Rd New Plymouth P19 012304 Bertrand Rd 4000653 Bertrand Rd Q19 194390 (Waitara Valley) Ngatimaru Rd 4000670 Ngatimaru Rd Q19 210393 (delivery) Te Kuiti South 4001941 Mangatea Rd Te Kuiti S16 953161 Te Kuiti North 4001975 Oparure Rd Te Kuiti S16 963192 Otorohanga 4002135 Waitomo Valley Rd Otorohanga S16 021338 Pokuru 4002308 Candy Rd Te Awamutu S15 040487 Pirongia 4002374 Pirongia Rd Pirongia S15 047551 Ngaruawahia 4002753 Hakarimata Rd Ngaruawahia S14 991911 Rotowaro 4002906 Rotowaro Rd Rotowaro S13 928028 Huntly Town 4030086 Rotowaro Rd Huntly S13 002041 Huntly Power Station 4030087 Rotowaro Rd Huntly S13 002041 Notes: In this table Offtake Points comprise physical offtakes from the MDL-owned pipeline only. The offtake point for the former New Plymouth Power Station is treated as decommissioned. Maui Development Limited Page 6