Atqasuk Wind Resource Report

Similar documents
Buckland Wind Resource Report

Draft Kivalina Wind Resource Report

Pitka s Point, Alaska Wind Resource Report

Kake, Alaska Wind Resource Report

Saint Mary s, Alaska Wind Resource Report (for Pitka s Point and Saint Mary s met towers)

Kodiak, Alaska Site 1 Wind Resource Report

Egegik, Alaska Wind Resource Assessment Report

Kodiak, Alaska Site 1 Wind Resource Report for Kodiak Electric Association

Wind Resource Assessment for NOME (ANVIL MOUNTAIN), ALASKA Date last modified: 5/22/06 Compiled by: Cliff Dolchok

Site Description: LOCATION DETAILS Report Prepared By: Tower Site Report Date

Site Description: Tower Site

Shaktoolik, Alaska Wind Resource Report

Levelock, Alaska Wind Resource Assessment Report

Site Summary. Wind Resource Summary. Wind Resource Assessment For King Cove Date Last Modified: 8/6/2013 By: Rich Stromberg & Holly Ganser

Wind Data Verification Report Arriga 50m

Wind Resource Assessment for FALSE PASS, ALASKA Site # 2399 Date last modified: 7/20/2005 Prepared by: Mia Devine

National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Wind Resource Data Summary Guam Naval Ordnance Annex Data Summary and Retrieval for November 2009

Wind Resource Assessment for SAINT PAUL, ALASKA

Kisimigiuktuk Hill (Kivalina), Alaska Wind Resource Assessment and Wind Flow Modeling Report

Wind Resource Assessment for DEADHORSE, ALASKA

Chevak, Alaska Wind Resource Report

LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA ANNUAL REPORT. Mass Turnpike Authority Blandford, MA

Wind Resource Assessment for KING SALMON, ALASKA

Nikolski, Alaska Wind Resource Report

WIND DATA REPORT. Bourne Water District

Wind Resource Assessment for CHEFORNAK, ALASKA

Gambell, Alaska Wind Resource Report

LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA ANNUAL REPORT. Paxton, MA

WIND DATA REPORT. Paxton, MA

Clark s Point, Alaska Wind Resource Report

Quinhagak, Alaska Wind Resource Report

July Interim Report. National Institute of Wind Energy (NIWE) Wind Resource Assessment & Offshore Unit Chennai, India.

WIND DATA REPORT. Mass Turnpike Authority Blandford, MA

Wind Regimes 1. 1 Wind Regimes

WIND DATA REPORT. Mass Turnpike Authority Blandford, MA

WIND DATA REPORT. Bishop and Clerks

WIND DATA REPORT. Mt. Tom

LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA ANNUAL REPORT. Bishop & Clerks

The Wind Resource: Prospecting for Good Sites

COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

WIND DATA REPORT. Mt. Lincoln Pelham, MA

Kodiak, Alaska Site 1 Wind Resource Report

LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA QUARTERLY REPORT. Bishop and Clerks

FINAL WIND DATA REPORT. Mattapoisett Mattapoisett, Massachusetts

windnavigator Site Analyst Report

LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA ANNUAL REPORT WBZ

WIND DATA REPORT. Ragged Mt Maine

WIND DATA REPORT. Vinalhaven

Valerijs Bezrukovs, Vladislavs Bezrukovs Ventspils University College Latvia. WREF2012 Denver, CO May 13-17, 2012

LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA QUARTERLY REPORT. Bishop and Clerks

LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA QUARTERLY REPORT. Bishop and Clerks

WIND DATA REPORT. Quincy DPW, MA

WIND DATA REPORT. Paxton, MA

Design Criteria Data

Testing and Validation of the Triton Sodar

Design Criteria Data

WIND DATA REPORT. Mt. Tom

WIND DATA REPORT. Swan s Island, ME

Wind Project Siting & Resource Assessment

Design Criteria Data

Validation of Measurements from a ZephIR Lidar

Wind Speed and Energy at Different Heights on the Latvian Coast of the Baltic Sea

Wisconsin 511 Traveler Information Annual Usage Summary January 3, Wisconsin 511 Phone Usage ( )

WCA Wind Research Project Report

!"#$%& ' & $ % &&()*+,

Meteorological Measurements OWEZ

Meteorological Measurements OWEZ

Lopez Community Land Trust. Final Wind Energy Report

HOUTEN WIND FARM WIND RESOURCE ASSESSMENT

Properties. terc.ucdavis.edu 8

3D Nacelle Mounted Lidar in Complex Terrain

New Stuyahok-Ekwok Intertie Route Wind Power Site Options

Energy Output. Outline. Characterizing Wind Variability. Characterizing Wind Variability 3/7/2015. for Wind Power Management

Wind farm performance

Sonic Detection and Ranging (SODAR) Data Collection and Evaluation Report

An Atlas of Oceanic Internal Solitary Waves (February 2004) by Global Ocean Associates Prepared for Office of Naval Research Code 322 PO

Rural Small Wind Energy:

NordFoU: External Influences on Spray Patterns (EPAS) Report 16: Wind exposure on the test road at Bygholm

Increased Project Bankability : Thailand's First Ground-Based LiDAR Wind Measurement Campaign

WindPRO version Nov 2012 Project:

Evaluating Extreme Storm Power and Potential Implications to Coastal Infrastructure Damage, Oregon Coast, USA

Terms and Definitions for Small Wind Site Assessor

Progress Report on the Design and Planning of an Infrastructure Improvement Project for the Sunnyside TIF District (Phase II)

Wind Monitoring Update for Tuktoyaktuk, Winter 2009

Wind Resource Assessment Storm Hills, NWT

WIND RESOURCE ASSESSMENT FOR THE STATE OF WYOMING

STATUS REPORT FOR THE SUBMERGED REEF BALL TM ARTIFICIAL REEF SUBMERGED BREAKWATER BEACH STABILIZATION PROJECT FOR THE GRAND CAYMAN MARRIOTT HOTEL

Meteorology of Monteverde, Costa Rica 2007

WIND SHEAR, ROUGHNESS CLASSES AND TURBINE ENERGY PRODUCTION

CORRELATION EFFECTS IN THE FIELD CLASSIFICATION OF GROUND BASED REMOTE WIND SENSORS

Farm Energy IQ. Farms Today Securing Our Energy Future. Wind Energy on Farms

Investigation of Vertical Wind Shear Characteristics Using 50m Meteorological Tower Data

Wellington Street : Wind Impact Qualitative Assessment. To Whom It May Concern, RE: Proposed Wellington Street Wind Impact Qualitative Assessment

Farm Energy IQ. Wind Energy on Farms. Objectives of this Module. How windy is it? How windy is it? How windy is it? 2/16/2015

How an extreme wind atlas is made

E. Agu, M. Kasperski Ruhr-University Bochum Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Sciences

The Wind Observation on the Pacific Ocean for Offshore Wind Farm

FIVE YEARS OF OPERATION OF THE FIRST OFFSHORE WIND RESEARCH PLATFORM IN THE GERMAN BIGHT FINO1

CCoWS. Central Coast Watershed Studies. Summary of Precipitation and Streamflow for Potrero and San Clemente Creeks in 2010

Appendix ELP El Paso, Texas 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

Transcription:

Atqasuk Wind Resource Report Report by: Douglas Vaught, P.E., V3 Energy LLC, Eagle River, Alaska Date of Report: August 26, 2010 Atqasuk met tower; D. Vaught photo Contents Summary... 2 Test Site Location... 3 Photographs... 4 Data Quality... 4 Wind Speed... 5 Time Series... 6 Daily Wind Profile... 7 Probability Distribution Function... 8 Wind Shear and Roughness... 8 Extreme Winds... 10 Temperature and density... 11 Monthly temperature boxplot... 11

Atqasuk Wind Resource Report Page 2 Air density DMap... 12 Wind Speed Scatterplot... 12 Wind direction... 13 Turbulence... 14 Airport AWSS Data... 16 Summary The wind resource measured to date in Atqasuk appears to be promising for wind power development, but winter data recovery was very poor. Wind power class 3 (fair) is calculated but that with only one year of data characterized by poor winter data recovery, that classification may well be in error. With respect to other criteria, the Atqasuk site experiences very low turbulence conditions and apparent low extreme wind probability. To improve confidence of measurement of the wind resource in Atqasuk, especially during the winter months, a met tower equipped with heated sensors (at least one anemometer and one wind vane) is strongly suggested. Met tower data synopsis Data dates June 22, 2009 to July 16, 2010 (13 months) Wind power class Class 3 (fair) Power density mean, 30 m 305 W/m 2 (QC d data); 266 W/m 2 (with synthetic data) Wind speed mean, 30 m 6.48 m/s (QC d data); 6.07 m/s (with synthetic data) Max. 10-min wind speed average 19.6 m/s Maximum wind gust 23.1 m/s (Feb 2010) Weibull distribution k = 2.23, c = 7.15 m/s Wind shear power law exponent 0.119 (moderate) Roughness class 0.73 (lawn grass) IEC 61400-1, 3 rd ed. classification Class III-c (lowest defined and most common) Turbulence intensity, mean 0.075 (at 15 m/s) Calm wind frequency 19% (<3.5 m/s) Community profile Current Population: Incorporation Type: Borough Located In: Taxes: 201 (2009 DCCED Certified Population) 2nd Class City North Slope Borough Coastal Management District: North Slope Borough Sales: None, Property: 18.5 mills (Borough), Special: None

Atqasuk Wind Resource Report Page 3 Test Site Location The met tower was installed approximately 1,500 meters (4,800 ft) northwest of the village of Atqasuk, near a large lagoon and just south of the village landfill. This site is well exposed to winter winds with no upwind obstructions. Site Information Site number 0223 Latitude/longitude N 70 29.810 W 157 26.826, WGS 84 Site elevation 23 meters (74 ft) Datalogger type NRG Symphonie, 10 minute time step Tower type NRG 34-meter tall tower, 152 mm diameter, erected to 30 m Anchor type 1.5 m screw-in Google Earth image Tower Sensor Information Channel Sensor type Height Multiplier Offset Orientation 1 NRG #40 anemometer 30 m (A) 0.754 0.40 181 T 2 NRG #40 anemometer 30 m (B) 0.758 0.35 271 T 3 NRG #40 anemometer 20 m 0.753 0.41 272 T 7 NRG #200P wind vane 29 m 0.351 357 357 T 9 NRG #110S Temp C 3 m 0.136-86.383 N 10 RH-5 relative humidity 2 m 0.098 0 S 12 Voltmeter 2 m 0.021 0 n/a

Atqasuk Wind Resource Report Page 4 Photographs Soft rice ice on guy wire; D. Vaught photo Icing buildup on datalogger box; D. Vaught photo Top of met tower; D. Vaught photo Robert Akpik in Atqasuk; D. Vaught photo Data Quality Data recovery in Atqasuk was marginal with 63 to 73 percent data return from the anemometers and wind vane. The missing data represents the windier winter months when data recovery was extremely poor. This poor data recovery was due to soft rime ice (hoarfrost), beginning in October and lasting to early May (note a very similar data loss pattern was documented in Wainwright). Photographs taken in early February indicated heavy hoarfrost icing conditions which likely prevailed during the entire winter and were largely responsible for the poor data return. Note also that data loss from the relative humidity sensor is due to voltage drawdown of the ipack battery during the dark months of winter. Full operability of this sensor returned in early April when the PV panels recharged the ipack battery sufficiently to power it.

Atqasuk Wind Resource Report Page 5 Data recovery summary table Possible Valid Recovery Label Units Height Records Records Rate (%) Speed 30 A m/s 30 m 56,088 39,791 70.9 Speed 30 B m/s 30 m 56,088 40,649 72.5 Speed 20 m/s 20 m 56,088 40,924 73.0 Direction 29 29 m 56,088 35,258 62.9 Temperature C 56,088 55,907 99.7 RH-5 Humidity %RH %RH 56,088 35,572 63.4 ipack Voltmeter volts 56,088 55,944 99.7 Anemometer data recovery 30 m A 30 m B 20 m Year Month Possible Valid Recovery Valid Recovery Valid Recovery Records Records Rate (%) Records Rate (%) Records Rate (%) 2009 Jun 1,296 1,296 100.0 1,296 100.0 1,296 100.0 2009 Jul 4,464 4,464 100.0 4,464 100.0 4,464 100.0 2009 Aug 4,464 4,464 100.0 4,464 100.0 4,464 100.0 2009 Sep 4,320 4,320 100.0 4,320 100.0 4,320 100.0 2009 Oct 4,464 3,386 75.9 3,214 72.0 3,510 78.6 2009 Nov 4,320 1,147 26.6 1,274 29.5 1,225 28.4 2009 Dec 4,464 89 2.0 164 3.7 340 7.6 2010 Jan 4,464 1,190 26.7 1,190 26.7 1,190 26.7 2010 Feb 4,032 1,960 48.6 1,830 45.4 2,528 62.7 2010 Mar 4,464 3,124 70.0 3,719 83.3 2,737 61.3 2010 Apr 4,320 3,750 86.8 4,195 97.1 4,188 96.9 2010 May 4,464 4,071 91.2 4,073 91.2 4,132 92.6 2010 Jun 4,320 4,320 100.0 4,236 98.1 4,320 100.0 2010 Jul 2,232 2,210 99.0 2,210 99.0 2,210 99.0 All data 56,088 39,791 70.9 40,649 72.5 40,924 73.0 Wind Speed Wind data collected from the met tower, from the perspective of both mean wind speed and mean power density, indicates a moderate wind resource, but loss of such a significant percentage of winter data reduces the certainty of this assessment. Because it is problematic analyzing wind data with significant concentrated data loss, synthetic data was inserted in the data gaps to create a more realistic wind speed data profile. To be sure, long segments of synthetic data introduce uncertainty to the data set, in this significantly, but missing data is uncertain as well. To overcome this uncertainty, improved data collection with heated sensors would be necessary and advisable for Atqasuk.

Atqasuk Wind Resource Report Page 6 Anemometer summary Variable Speed 30 A Original data set Speed 30 B Speed 20 Synthesized data set Speed 30 A Speed 30 B Speed 20 Measurement height (m) 30 30 20 30 30 20 Mean wind speed (m/s) 6.48 6.21 5.95 6.07 6.07 5.77 Max wind speed (m/s) (10-min avg) 19.5 19.6 18.6 19.5 19.6 18.6 Max wind speed (m/s) (gust) 23.0 23.1 22.6 Weibull k 2.23 2.17 2.18 2.15 2.14 2.11 Weibull c (m/s) 7.15 7.06 6.80 6.89 6.88 6.55 Mean power density (W/m²) 305 290 256 266 267 233 Mean energy content (kwh/m²/yr) 2,674 2,543 2,239 2,333 2,338 2,038 Energy pattern factor 1.71 1.75 1.75 1.76 1.77 1.79 Frequency of calms (%) 18.0 19.5 21.2 20.5 20.8 23.4 1-hr autocorrelation coefficient 0.943 0.946 0.947 0.940 0.940 0.941 Diurnal pattern strength 0.063 0.060 0.068 0.062 0.061 0.068 Hour of peak wind speed 18 18 18 18 18 17 Time Series Time series calculations indicated moderate wind speed averages throughout the year with lower winds measured in late winter and autumn. Poor data return, however, may have affected this analysis. 30m A data summary Original data Synthesis data Year Month Mean Max 10- min Max gust Mean Max 10- min Max gust (m/s) (m/s) (m/s) (m/s) (m/s) (m/s) 2009 Jun 7.75 12.6 15.1 7.75 12.6 15.1 2009 Jul 6.21 13.5 16.2 6.21 13.5 16.2 2009 Aug 6.05 14.7 18.5 6.05 14.7 18.5 2009 Sep 5.54 16.2 20.7 5.54 16.2 20.7 2009 Oct 6.51 17.9 21.5 6.21 17.9 21.5 2009 Nov 5.79 13.0 17.0 4.67 13.0 17.0 2009 Dec 8.07 11.0 15.5 5.72 16.5 15.5 2010 Jan 6.65 13.1 15.9 6.81 16.2 15.9 2010 Feb 7.47 19.5 23.0 7.16 19.5 23.0 2010 Mar 5.84 12.7 15.1 5.23 12.7 15.1 2010 Apr 5.57 14.7 17.0 5.30 14.7 17.0 2010 May 6.74 14.9 17.0 6.64 14.9 17.0 2010 Jun 6.98 14.7 17.7 6.98 14.7 17.7 2010 Jul 6.94 14.4 17.0 6.96 14.4 17.0 MMM annual 6.48 19.5 23.0 6.07 19.5 23.0

Atqasuk Wind Resource Report Page 7 Time series graph (synth. data) 8 Seasonal Wind Speed Profile Speed 30 A Speed 30 B Speed 20 6 Mean Wind Speed (m/s) 4 2 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Daily Wind Profile The daily wind profile indicates relatively high variation (for a cold climate location) of wind speeds throughout the day, with lowest wind speeds during the morning hours and highest wind speeds during late afternoon and early evening hours. This perspective changes somewhat when considering monthly views of daily profiles as considerably more variation is observed. Annual daily wind profile (synth. data) Daily Wind Speed Profile 7 6 Speed 30 A Speed 30 B Speed 20 Mean Wind Speed (m/s) 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 6 12 18 24 Hour of Day

Atqasuk Wind Resource Report Page 8 Monthly daily wind profile (synth. data) Probability Distribution Function The probability distribution function (or histogram) of wind speed indicates a near-normal shape curve of wind speeds (defined as the Raleigh distribution, k=2.0). Wind Shear and Roughness A wind shear power law exponent of 0.119 indicates moderately low wind shear at the site; hence turbine construction at a low hub height is possibly a desirable option. Related to wind shear, a calculated surface roughness of 0.0078 meters (indicating the height above ground level where wind velocity would be zero) indicates relatively smooth terrain (roughness description: lawn grass) surrounding the met tower, especially toward the prevailing wind direction of northeast.

Atqasuk Wind Resource Report Page 9 Vertical wind shear profile, wind speed > 4 m/s Vertical Wind Shear Profile, All Sectors, 4-100 m/s 100 Measured data Power law fit (alpha = 0.119) Log law fit (z0 = 0.00547 m) 80 Height Above Ground (m) 60 40 20 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 Mean Wind Speed (m/s) Wind shear by direction sector table, wind speed > 4 m/s Mean Wind Speed (m/s) Time Sector Direction Sector Steps Wind (%) Speed 30 B Speed 20 Best-Fit Power Law Exp Best-Fit Surface Roughness (m) 348.75-11.25 1,310 5.0% 6.34 6.08 0.101 0.0012 11.25-33.75 3,067 11.6% 6.98 6.70 0.101 0.0013 33.75-56.25 7,948 30.2% 7.69 7.47 0.073 0.0000 56.25-78.75 5,030 19.1% 8.35 8.07 0.085 0.0002 78.75-101.25 1,457 5.5% 6.99 6.38 0.223 0.2741 101.25-123.75 507 1.9% 5.95 5.47 0.206 0.1915 123.75-146.25 318 1.2% 6.36 5.72 0.259 0.5125 146.25-168.75 549 2.1% 6.94 6.29 0.241 0.3866 168.75-191.25 536 2.0% 7.17 6.61 0.198 0.1574 191.25-213.75 1,017 3.9% 7.06 6.68 0.137 0.0166 213.75-236.25 1,287 4.9% 6.72 6.27 0.172 0.0735 236.25-258.75 1,237 4.7% 8.00 7.59 0.133 0.0131 258.75-281.25 736 2.8% 6.80 6.41 0.145 0.0243 281.25-303.75 425 1.6% 6.39 6.11 0.113 0.0035 303.75-326.25 367 1.4% 5.81 5.56 0.107 0.0021 326.25-348.75 551 2.1% 5.45 5.27 0.085 0.0002

Atqasuk Wind Resource Report Page 10 Extreme Winds Although thirteen months of data is minimal for calculation of extreme wind probability, use of a modified Gumbel distribution analysis, based on monthly maximum winds vice annual maximum winds, yields reasonably good results. Extreme wind analysis indicates a very low probability of extreme wind events, but one should be cautioned that the poor winter anemometer data return significantly reduces the confidence of this calculation. Even so, general aspects of Atqasuk, including distance from the coast, far northerly location and lack of exposure to Gulf of Alaska storm winds increases the likelihood that extreme wind events are uncommon and not highly energetic. Industry standard reference of extreme wind is the 50 year, 10-minute average probable wind speed, referred to as V ref. For Wainwright, this calculates to 21.7 m/s, well below the 37.5 m/s threshold of International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 61400-1, 3 rd edition criteria for a Class III site. Note that Class III extreme wind classification is the lowest defined and all wind turbines are designed for this wind regime. Extreme wind speed probability table (original data) V ref Gust IEC 61400-1, 3rd ed. Period (years) (m/s) (m/s) Class V ref, m/s 2 17.4 21.3 I 50.0 10 19.6 24.0 II 42.5 15 20.1 24.6 III 37.5 30 21.0 25.8 designerspecified S 50 21.7 26.6 100 22.7 27.7 average gust factor: 1.22 Extreme wind speed probability graph 30.0 28.0 Wind Speed, m/s 26.0 24.0 22.0 20.0 18.0 (m/s) Gust 16.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Period, years

Atqasuk Wind Resource Report Page 11 Temperature and density Atqasuk experiences relatively warm summers (compared to the coast) and extremely cold winters with multiple recordings of sub negative 40 degree temperatures. The result is high air density; calculated air density exceeds standard air density for a 23 meter elevation (1.222 Kg/m 3 ) by nine percent. This is advantageous in wind power operations as most wind turbines produce more power at low temperatures (high air density) than at standard temperature and density. Temperature and density table Temperature Air Density Month Mean Min Max Mean Min Max ( C) ( C) ( C) (kg/m³) (kg/m³) (kg/m³) Jan -28.1-41.9-12.6 1.438 1.351 1.522 Feb -24.5-44.4-13.1 1.417 1.353 1.538 Mar -24.7-42.2-11.8 1.417 1.347 1.524 Apr -11.9-32.7 2.0 1.347 1.222 1.464 May -5.1-19.8 4.3 1.313 1.268 1.389 Jun 5.3-0.7 22.1 1.264 1.192 1.292 Jul 11.0 1.3 29.4 1.239 1.163 1.282 Aug 7.6 1.0 22.1 1.254 1.192 1.284 Sep 2.0-6.5 16.6 1.279 1.215 1.320 Oct -4.1-17.5 8.1 1.305 1.222 1.377 Nov -19.1-36.3-5.7 1.386 1.316 1.486 Dec -20.5-38.8-0.6 1.394 1.291 1.502 Annual -9.3-44.4 29.4 1.338 1.163 1.538 Monthly temperature boxplot 40 Monthly Statistics for Temperature 20 ma x daily high mean daily low min 0 Value ( C) -20-40 -60 Jan Feb Ma r Apr Ma y Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Ann

Atqasuk Wind Resource Report Page 12 Air density DMap Wind Speed Scatterplot The wind speed versus temperature scatterplot below indicates that a substantial percentage of wind in Atqasuk coincides with very cold temperatures, as one would expect given its high arctic location. During the met tower test period, temperatures fell below -40 C on many occasions. Wind speed versus temperature scatterplot (synth. data) 20 Speed 30 A vs. Temperature, All Sectors 15 Speed 30 A (m/s) 10 5 0-60 -40-20 0 20 40 Temperature ( C)

Atqasuk Wind Resource Report Page 13 Wind Direction Wind frequency rose data indicates highly directional winds from the northeast. Power density rose data (representing the power in the wind) indicates power winds are also strongly directional, from the northeast. Calm frequency (percent of time that winds at 30 meter level are less than 3.5 m/s) was 19 percent during the met tower test period. Note however that the wind vane had extremely poor data return during the winter months, so winter wind roses below should be evaluated with caution. Wind frequency rose Mean value rose Wind energy rose Scatterplot rose

Atqasuk Wind Resource Report Page 14 Wind density roses by month Turbulence To date, the mean turbulence intensity of 0.075 at 15 m/s is within acceptable standards and classifies the site as IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission) 61400-1, 3 rd edition (2005) turbulence category C (lowest). Turbulence intensity, all wind sectors Turbulence Intensity at 30 m, All Sectors 0.6 0.5 Representative TI IEC Category A IEC Category B IEC Category C 0.4 Turbulence Intensity 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0 6 12 18 24 Wind Speed (m/s)

Atqasuk Wind Resource Report Page 15 Turbulence intensity, northeast (prevailing) wind sector Turbulence Intensity at 30 m, 45-75 0.6 0.5 Representative TI IEC Category A IEC Category B IEC Category C 0.4 Turbulence Intensity 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0 5 10 15 20 Wind Speed (m/s) Turbulence intensity by direction Turbulence table Bin Bin Endpoints Midpoint Lower Upper (m/s) (m/s) (m/s) Records in Bin Mean TI Std Dev. of TI Representative TI Peak TI 1 0.5 1.5 1,057 0.362 0.154 0.559 0.857 2 1.5 2.5 2,010 0.177 0.093 0.296 1.190 3 2.5 3.5 3,306 0.118 0.059 0.193 0.594 4 3.5 4.5 4,808 0.094 0.040 0.145 0.425 5 4.5 5.5 4,819 0.084 0.035 0.129 0.667 6 5.5 6.5 4,820 0.084 0.031 0.123 0.386 7 6.5 7.5 4,924 0.082 0.028 0.117 0.288

Atqasuk Wind Resource Report Page 16 8 7.5 8.5 4,184 0.082 0.025 0.113 0.227 9 8.5 9.5 3,324 0.084 0.024 0.115 0.234 10 9.5 10.5 2,679 0.083 0.024 0.114 0.505 11 10.5 11.5 1,667 0.082 0.023 0.111 0.175 12 11.5 12.5 789 0.085 0.021 0.112 0.200 13 12.5 13.5 429 0.089 0.020 0.114 0.236 14 13.5 14.5 202 0.086 0.017 0.108 0.148 15 14.5 15.5 165 0.075 0.016 0.096 0.138 16 15.5 16.5 140 0.073 0.012 0.089 0.115 17 16.5 17.5 84 0.073 0.010 0.086 0.114 18 17.5 18.5 15 0.070 0.012 0.085 0.098 19 18.5 19.5 5 0.077 0.015 0.096 0.099 20 19.5 20.5 1 0.082 0.000 0.082 0.082 Airport AWSS Data Airport wind data has been requested of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration s Anchorage office but not yet received.