IN THE MATTER OF SALARY ARBITRATION BETWEEN: LARS ELLER -AND- THE MONTREAL CANADIENS SUBMISSION ON BEHALF OF LARS ELLER TEAM 21

Similar documents
In the Matter of Salary Arbitration Between: Lars Eller -AND- The Montreal Canadiens. Team 9. Submission of Lars Eller

2014 Hockey Arbitration Competition of Canada

2014 Hockey Arbitration Competition of Canada. Lars Eller v. The Montreal Canadiens. Team 10. Submission on Behalf of Lars Eller

Lars Eller v. Montreal Canadiens

IN THE MATTER OF SALARY ARBITRATION BETWEEN: LARS ELLER -AND- THE MONTREAL CANADIENS BRIEF OF THE MONTREAL CANADIENS. Team 27

IN THE MATTER OF SALARY ARBITRATION BETWEEN: CODY FRANSON -AND- THE TORONTO MAPLE LEAFS SUBMISSION ON BEHALF OF CODY FRANSON TEAM 21

2013 Hockey Arbitration Competition of Canada

IN THE MATTER OF SALARY ARBITRATION BETWEEN: CODY FRANSON -AND- THE TORONTO MAPLE LEAFS

IN THE MATTER OF SALARY ARBITRATION BETWEEN: LARS ELLER - AND - THE MONTREAL CANADIENS BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THE MONTREAL CANADIANS HOCKEY CLUB (TEAM 8)

Team 1. Lars Eller vs. Montreal Canadiens. Submissions on behalf of Montreal Canadiens (Team Side)

IN THE MATTER OF SALARY ARBITRATION BETWEEN: LARS FOSGAARD ELLER. - and - THE MONTREAL CANADIENS BRIEF OF LARS FOSGAARD ELLER TEAM 19

2014 HOCKEY ARBITRATION COMPETITION OF CANADA Derick Brassard vs. New York Rangers Submission on behalf of the New York Rangers Midpoint: $5 Million

HOCKEY ARBITRATION COMPETITION OF CANADA

IN THE MATTER OF SALARY ARBITRATION BETWEEN: CODY FRANSON -AND- THE TORONTO MAPLE LEAFS BRIEF ON BEHALF OF THE PLAYER CODY FRANSON TEAM 3

IN THE MATTER OF SALARY ARBITRATION BETWEEN: CARL GUNNARSSON -AND- THE TORONTO MAPLE LEAFS BRIEF OF THE TORONTO MAPLE LEAFS TEAM 32

2013 HOCKEY ARBITRATION COMPETITION OF CANADA. Mats Zuccarello v. The New York Rangers. Submission on Behalf of Mats Zuccarello. Midpoint: $1.

Team 1. Cody Franson vs. Toronto Maple Leafs. Submission on behalf of Cody Franson (Player Side)

2013 HOCKEY ARBITRATION COMPETITION OF CANADA

HOCKEY ARBITRATION COMPETITION OF CANADA

Team 10. Carl Gunnarsson. Club Side

SALARY ARBITRATION BETWEEN CODY FRANSON AND THE TORONTO MAPLE LEAFS BRIEF FOR CODY FRANSON TEAM 17

In the Matter of Salary Arbitration Between: Cody Franson. -And- Toronto Maple Leafs. Brief of: Toronto Maple Leafs (Club) Team 31

Team Number 25 Case: Lars Eller Club s Representative

2012 Hockey Arbitration Competition of Canada

IN THE MATTER OF A SALARY ARBITRATION LARS ELLER -AND- MONTREAL CANADIENS NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ARBITRATORS

NHL SALARY ARBITRATION CHRIS STEWART AND THE ST. LOUIS BLUES BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF CHRIS STEWART

Team 10 Mats Zuccarello Club Side

2013 Hockey Arbitration Competition of Canada. Carl Gunnarsson v Toronto Maple Leafs Submission on Behalf of Carl Gunnarsson Submission by Team 24

IN THE MATTER OF SALARY ARBITRATION CARL GUNNARSSON AND THE TORONTO MAPLE LEAFS

HOCKEY ARBITRATION COMPETITION OF CANADA

2013 Hockey Arbitration Competition of Canada

IN THE MATTER OF SALARY ARBITRATION BETWEEN: CODY FRANSON. - and - THE TORONTO MAPLE LEAFS BRIEF OF CODY FRANSON TEAM 19

In the Matter of Salary Arbitration Between: Cody Franson -AND- The Toronto Maple Leafs. Team 9. Submission of the Toronto Maple Leafs

2012 Hockey Arbitration Competition of Canada

2013 HOCKEY ARBITRATION COMPETITION OF CANADA

2013 HOCKEY ARBITRATION COMPETITION OF CANADA. Carl Gunnarsson v. Toronto Maple Leafs. Submission on Behalf of the Player. Midpoint: $3.

Team Number 25 Case: Cody Franson Club s Representative

IN THE MATTER OF SALARY ARBITRATION BETWEEN: DERICK BRASSARD - AND - THE NEW YORK RANGERS HOCKEY CLUB BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DERICK BRASSARD (TEAM 8)

2013 National Baseball Arbitration Competition

TEAM 12. Case 1: SAM GAGNER. Acting for PLAYER

2013 HOCKEY ARBITRATION COMPETITION OF CANADA. Chris Stewart v St. Louis Blues (NHL) SUBMISSION ON BEHALF OF CHRIS STEWART TEAM #14

CARL GUNNARSSON THE TORONTO MAPLE LEAFS

IN THE MATTER OF SALARY ARBITRATION BETWEEN: CODY FRANSON -AND- THE TORONTO MAPLE LEAFS SUBMISSION OF BEHALF OF THE TORONTO MAPLE LEAFS TEAM 28

IN THE MATTER OF A SALARY ARBITRATION BETWEEN: CARL GUNNARSSON - AND - THE TORONTO MAPLE LEAFS BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THE TORONTO MAPLE LEAFS HOCKEY CLUB

Mats Zuccarello-Aasen v. New York Rangers. Team 4. Representing: the Player

2014 National Baseball Arbitration Competition

~ BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF CARL GUNNARSSON ~ IN THE MATTER OF SALARY ARBITRATION BETWEEN: CARL GUNNARSSON AND THE TORONTO MAPLE LEAFS

2014 Tulane Baseball Arbitration Competition Eric Hosmer v. Kansas City Royals (MLB)

Team 9 IN THE MATTER OF A SALARY ARBITRATION BETWEEN: SAM GAGNER. (The Player ) and THE EDMONTON OILERS. (The Club ) THE PLAYER S BRIEF

HOCKEY ARBITRATION COMPETITION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF SALARY ARBITRATION BETWEEN DERRICK BRASSARD - AND - THE NEW YORK RANGERS

Table of Contents I. Introduction and Request for Hearing Decision... 2 Chart 1.1 Comparable Player Salaries... 3 II. Player Profile... 3 III.

IN THE MATTER OF AN ARTICLE 12 SALARY ARBITRATION PURSUANT TO THE NATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGUE S COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREMEENT MATS ZUCCARELLO -AND-

2014 NATIONAL BASEBALL ARBITRATION COMPETITION

Team Number 6. Tommy Hanson v. Atlanta Braves. Side represented: Atlanta Braves

2014 NATIONAL BASEBALL ARBITRATION COMPETITION ERIC HOSMER V. KANSAS CITY ROYALS (MLB) SUBMISSION ON BEHALF OF THE CLUB KANSAS CITY ROYALS

2014 Tulane Baseball Arbitration Competition Josh Reddick v. Oakland Athletics (MLB)

2013 Tulane National Baseball Arbitration Competition

Jenrry Mejia v. New York Mets Submission on Behalf of New York Mets Midpoint: $2.6 Million Submission by Team 18

2014 National Baseball Arbitration Competition

JEFF SAMARDZIJA CHICAGO CUBS BRIEF FOR THE CHICAGO CUBS TEAM 4

2015 National Baseball Arbitration Competition

Team 10. Texas Rangers v. Nelson Cruz. Brief in support of Nelson Cruz

2015 National Baseball Arbitration Competition

2014 National Baseball Arbitration Competition

2015 NATIONAL BASEBALL ARBITRATION COMPETITION

Lorenzo Cain v. Kansas City Royals. Submission on Behalf of the Kansas City Royals. Team 14

Jenrry Mejia v. New York Mets Submission on Behalf of the New York Mets Midpoint: $2.6M Submission by Team 32

2015 NATIONAL BASEBALL ARBITRATION COMPETITION. Mark Trumbo v. Arizona Diamondbacks. Submission on Behalf of Mark Trumbo. Midpoint: $5,900,000

2014 National Baseball Arbitration Competition

Dexter Fowler v. Colorado Rockies (MLB)

Dexter Fowler v. Colorado Rockies. Submission on Behalf of the Colorado Rockies. Team 18

2014 Tulane Baseball Arbitration Competition Eric Hosmer v. Kansas City Royals

TULANE BASEBALL ARBITRATION COMPETITION. Isaac Benjamin Davis. New York Metropolitan Baseball Club, Inc. ARBITRATION BRIEF FOR ISAAC BENJAMIN DAVIS

2014 Tulane National Baseball Arbitration Competition Jeff Samardzija v. Chicago Cubs (MLB)

2013 National Baseball Arbitration Competition. Tommy Hanson v. Atlanta Braves. Submission on behalf of Atlanta Braves. Submitted by Team 28

to the Kansas City Royals for the purposes of an arbitration hearing governed by the Major

TULANE UNIVERISTY BASEBALL ARBITRATION COMPETITION NELSON CRUZ V. TEXAS RANGERS BRIEF FOR THE TEXAS RANGERS TEAM # 13 SPRING 2012

2015 NATIONAL BASEBALL ARBITRATION COMPETITION. Lorenzo Cain v. Kansas City Royals (MLB) SUBMISSION ON BEHALF OF KANSAS CITY ROYALS BASEBALL CLUB

2013 National Baseball Arbitration Competition Tulane University Law School

Global Outlook: U.S. Driving Higher Values

TULANE NATIONAL BASEBALL ARBITRATION COMPETITION 2012 NELSON CRUZ, PLAYER TEXAS RANGERS, TEAM BRIEF FOR TEXAS RANGERS, TEAM. Team no.

An Analysis of Factors Contributing to Wins in the National Hockey League

Offensive Zone Entries. An analysis of Central Red Army vs. CJHL, March, by Richard K. Bercuson Coaching Coordinator, ODHA

WOMEN S SIX NATIONS 2008

Player Comparison. David Lee vs. LaMarcus Aldridge. Elbow Efficiency ELBOW TOUCHES PER GAME % OF TOUCHES ELBOW POINTS PER TOUCH

NHL SALARY DETERMINATION AND DISTRIBUTION A THESIS. Presented to. The Colorado College. Bachelor of Arts. Ian Young. February 2015

2015 NATIONAL BASEBALL ARBITRATION COMPETITION

Pasha Nayda Mathematics in Hockey. Pasha Nayda Math in Hockey April 26, / 34

Investigation of Winning Factors of Miami Heat in NBA Playoff Season

Americans in Transit A Profile of Public Transit Passengers

2016 Scoresheet Hockey Drafting Packet (for web draft leagues) Player Lists Explanation

Paul M. Sommers And Justin R. Gaines. March 2010 MIDDLEBURY COLLEGE ECONOMICS DISCUSSION PAPER NO

WELCOME TO FORM LAB MAX

Gray Diversion Study Draft Report

Two Machine Learning Approaches to Understand the NBA Data

2014 High Performance Athlete Evaluation

TRAFFIC CRASHES involving BICYCLISTS

Roberto Luongo's 12-year contract deal now under investigation

STATE OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF THE STATE COMPTROLLER 110 STATE STREET ALBANY, NEW YORK September 2015

Are the 2016 Golden State Warriors the Greatest NBA Team of all Time?

Transcription:

IN THE MATTER OF SALARY ARBITRATION BETWEEN: LARS ELLER -AND- THE MONTREAL CANADIENS SUBMISSION ON BEHALF OF LARS ELLER TEAM 21

I. INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW...1 A. Trend of Offensive Improvement and Strong Playoff Performance...1 B. Defensive Role and Physical Presence...2 C. Pressure Performer......4 II. VALID COMPARABLE PLAYERS...5 A. David Desharnais Montreal Canadiens....5 B. Patrik Berglund St. Louis Blues... 6 III. CONCLUSION..8

I. INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW This brief will examine Lars Eller s performance record for the Montreal Canadiens, in conformity with section 12.9 of the NHL Collective Bargaining Agreement. 1 Mr. Eller is a forward who demonstrates excellent point-producing potential, consistently contributes to his team s physical play, and performs exceedingly well in high-pressure situations. Moreover, an analysis of Mr. Eller s salary in comparison to similar players will reveal that he should be entitled to an increase beyond the $3.5 million midpoint figure. 2 Accordingly, we submit that Mr. Eller should be awarded $3.75 million per season in this arbitration. A. Trend of Offensive Improvement and Strong Playoff Performance Mr. Eller s offensive performance for the Canadiens has generally followed an upward trend. In the 2010-2011, 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 seasons, his points-per-game ( PPG ) numbers were 0.22, 0.35 and 0.65 respectively. 3 This type of improvement has also been reflected in the role he plays for Montreal s lineup, with his time on ice ( TOI ) increasing from 11:08 in 2010-2011 to 15:57 in 2013-2014. 4 This positive trend of offense illustrates Mr. Eller s strong and continuing contributions to the Canadiens lineup. Moreover, Mr. Eller has been a major offensive contributor to his team s playoff performance. In the Canadiens 2013-2014 playoff run, he registered an impressive PPG number of 0.76. 5 With a total of 13 points, this offensive success made Mr. Eller the 2 nd highest point producer of the team s 2013-2014 playoff run, trailing only one point behind P.K. Subban. 6 1 NHL Collective Bargaining Agreement, 2012, s.12. 2 http://capgeek.com/player/998 3 http://www.nhl.com/ice/playerstats 4 Ibid. 5 Ibid. 6 http://www.nhl.com/ice/teamstats 1

Mr. Eller s PPG ratio decreased somewhat to 0.34 in the 2013-2014 regular season, reflecting the team s offensive output as a whole. 7 In 2012-2013, the Canadiens placed 4 th in the league in goals-per-game with 3.04 goals. 8 The next season, the team s offensive output fell to 21 st in the league with 2.55 goals-per-game. 9 In fact, the Canadiens were outshot on average in the 2013-2014 season, with 31 shots against and 28.4 shots for per game. 10 Given the Canadiens were outshot and produced less goals per game and still managed to finish 4 th in the Eastern Conference their success is attributable to factors supplementing their modest goal-scoring. For example, the Canadiens goals-against average would also decrease significantly from 2012-2013 to this past season, with a drop from 2.58 to 2.45 in goals allowed (propelling them from 14 th to 8 th in the league overall). 11 Simultaneously, the team led the league in blocked shots. In the 2012-2013 season the Canadiens placed 14 th in the league in blocked shots; in 2013-2014, the Canadiens were 1 st overall with 1491 blocked shots total, an average of 18.2 per game. 12 The Canadiens also made a strong showing in shorthanded play: the team s penalty killing efficiency was ranked 4 th in the league in 2013-2014, compared to an abysmal 23 rd place in the previous year. 13 In short, the Canadiens of 2013-2014 have exemplified a style of play less reliant solely on offense and more contingent on well-rounded players which is tantamount to Mr. Eller s role on the team and added physical presence. B. Defensive Role and Physical Presence Although he has always demonstrated strong defensive and physical performance, Mr. Eller s value to the team in this regard was indispensable in the 2013-2014 regular season and 7 Ibid. 8 Ibid. 9 Ibid. 10 Ibid. 11 Ibid. 12 Ibid. 13 Ibid. 2

playoffs especially considering the Canadiens approach towards well-rounded play, as described earlier. In the regular season, he recorded an impressive total of 130 hits, which compares favourably to his fellow linemates totals of 110 for Alex Galchenyuk and 38 for Brendan Gallagher. 14 Mr. Eller s total of 130 hits made him the highest-hitting centre and forward on the team by far, with Travis Moen coming in second with only 92 hits. 15 This physical play continued into the 2013-2014 playoffs, with Mr. Eller registering 30 hits the most of any centre on the team. 16 Mr. Eller s increasingly physical and defensive role is also illustrated by the number of shots he blocked in 2013-2014. He recorded 58 blocks the most of any forward on the Canadiens and the 15 th highest of any centre in the league. 17 Finally, Mr. Eller s role as a more defensive offenceman can be ascertained from his relatively low powerplay time on ice per game, and higher penalty kill time. In the 2013-2014 season, he averaged only 1:06 on the powerplay, while his linemates Mr. Gallagher and Mr. Galchenyuk had 2:26 and 2:06 respectively. 18 This significantly reduced role on the powerplay compared to his teammates meant less opportunity was afforded for Mr. Eller to capitalize on advantageous offensive situations and shows the value the team placed on his defensive and physical play at even strength. Conversely, while Mr. Eller contributed an average of 1:24 minutes per game to the Canadiens penalty kill, his linemates Mr. Gallagher and Mr. Galchenyuk played virtually no penalty kill time, at 0:04 and 0:01 respectively. 19 14 http://www.nhl.com/ice/playerstats 15 http://www.nhl.com/ice/teamstats 16 http://www.nhl.com/ice/playerstats ; http://www.nhl.com/ice/teamstats 17 Ibid. 18 http://www.nhl.com/ice/playerstats 19 Ibid. 3

Mr. Eller s physical and defensive record in 2013-2014 typifies his shifting role as a centre. His 130 blocks in 2013-2014 represents a stunning increase over his last full-length season number of 72 hits in 2011-2012. Moreover, Mr. Eller s 58 blocks in 2013-2014 was also an improvement from his 55 blocks in 2011-2012. 20 The team s increasingly defensive style play in 2013-2014 reflects Mr. Eller s slightly decreased point production in this season. His increased focus on contributing to the Canadiens physical and defensive repertoire meant a shift away from his offensive role of previous years. As Mr. Eller becomes more accustomed to this new role, his point production will stabilize to match the trend he established in previous seasons. Indeed, in the 2013-2014 playoffs, Mr. Eller had already harmonized his physical presence and offensive role by recording 30 hits while also being the team s second highest points producer with an average of 0.76 points per game. 21 C. Pressure Performer Mr. Eller has proven himself as a player who performs well under pressure and can lead the team to success in tough situations. In the 2013-2014 season, all but one goal that Mr. Eller scored occurred while the Canadiens were either tied or trailing. 22 Moreover, he scored three game-winning goals in the regular season. 23 Mr. Eller has also proven effective for the Canadiens in penalty shots. In this same season, he scored on three out of four attempts. 24 In one game where he was selected for the shootout, Mr. Eller scored the lone goal on either team, winning the game for Montreal against Tampa Bay. 25 The four-win difference provided by Mr. Eller meant an extra 7 points for the team in the 2013-2014 regular season; to put Mr. Eller s 20 Ibid. 21 Ibid. 22 Ibid. 23 Ibid. 24 Ibid. 25 http://www.ctvnews.ca/sports/nhl-recap-habs-beat-lightning-in-shootout-oilers-fall-to-flyers-4-3-1.1610696 4

contribution into perspective with respect to a competitive playoff race, the Canadiens finished 4 th in the Eastern Conference with 100 points, while the 7 th and 8 th place teams had 93 points each. 26 The Canadiens also benefit from Mr. Eller s superior faceoff performance in pressure situations. Out of 979 faceoff attempts in the 2013-2014 regular season, he won 521 - for a faceoff win percentage of 53.2%. 27 This ranks Mr. Eller as the number one player on the team for faceoff win percentage, aside from players who made ten attempts or less. 28 Mr. Eller s ability to score when it counts and win critical faceoffs illustrates his overall value to the team as a wellrounded forward. II. VALID COMPARABLE PLAYERS A. David Desharnais Montreal Canadiens: Mr. Eller submits that he is a comparable player to his Montreal Canadiens teammate David Desharnais, who earned a midpoint salary of $3.5 million after his platform year of 2012-2013. 29 Both Mr. Eller and Mr. Desharnais are centres on the same team and currently earn the same midpoint salary. However, while Mr. Desharnais has proven himself as a point contributor, he does not fill the same diverse role for the team that Mr. Eller does. Mr. Desharnais and Mr. Eller recorded a similar number of points in the shortened 2012-2013 season with 28 and 30 respectively. 30 However, Mr. Desharnais record in the playoffs has been unremarkable in the 2012-2013 playoff run, he recorded only one point in five games. 31 Mr. Eller, on the other hand, contributed 13 points over 17 games during Montreal s playoff run 26 http://www.nhl.com/ice/standings 27 http://www.nhl.com/ice/playerstats 28 http://www.nhl.com/ice/teamstats 29 http://capgeek.com/player/98 30 http://www.nhl.com/ice/playerstats 31 Ibid. 5

in his platform season of 2013-2014. 32 While this made Mr. Eller the second-highest playoff point contributor for Montreal in 2013-2014, Mr. Desharnais was only the 9 th highest point scorer in his platform year. 33 Moreover, Mr. Desharnais does not strengthen Montreal s physical and defensive efforts to nearly the same extent as Mr. Eller. For example, in the 2012-2013 regular season, Mr. Desharnais only recorded 26 hits and 18 blocks, compared to Mr. Eller s 86 hits and 33 blocks. 34 As discussed above, Mr. Eller s physical record improved even further in the 2013-2014 season, with 130 hits and 58 blocks. 35 Mr. Desharnais virtually exclusively offensive role renders his contributions to the team one-dimensional in comparison with the diverse offensive, defensive and physical play displayed by Mr. Eller. Accordingly, due to Mr. Eller s more diverse contributions to the team, we submit that he should be entitled to a salary higher than the $3.5 million midpoint earned by Mr. Desharnais. 36 An award of $3.75 million per year would be more just based on his more well-rounded contributions to the Montreal roster. B. Patrik Berglund St. Louis Blues: Mr. Eller submits that he is a comparable player to Patrik Berglund of the St. Louis Blues, who earns a midpoint salary of $3.7 million. 37 Mr. Eller and Mr. Berglund are both centres, were drafted in 2007 and 2006 respectively, and perform similar roles for their teams. 38 In the 2013-2014 season, Mr. Berglund scored 14 goals and contributed 18 assists, for a total of 32 points. 39 This is only marginally higher than Mr. Eller s 12 goals, 14 assists and 26 32 Ibid. 33 http://www.nhl.com/ice/teamstats 34 http://www.nhl.com/ice/playerstats 35 Ibid. 36 http://capgeek.com/player/98 37 http://capgeek.com/player/964 38 http://www.nhl.com/ice/playerstats 6

points for the same season. However, Mr. Berglund has not shown a trend of improvement in recent seasons. From the 2010 through 2014 seasons, Mr. Berglund s PPG were 0.64, 0.46, 0.52, and 0.41 respectively. 40 While Mr. Berglund s best season in terms of PPG was 2010-2011, Mr. Eller s strongest regular season in the same regard was much more recent with 0.65 PPG in 2012-2013. 41 Moreover, Mr. Eller s most effective playoff run was the most recent, in 2013-2014, with a PPG of 0.76. 42 Mr. Berglund, on the other hand, failed to contribute to his team s playoff run this year at all. In the four games he played in the playoffs last year, Mr. Berglund failed to record a single point. 43 In fact, he only registered 9 shots, and left the playoffs with a plus-minus ranking of -7. 44 Conversely, Mr. Eller was a key component of his team s playoff success in 2013-2014, with a contribution of 13 points, 23 shots and an overall plus/minus rating of +6. 45 While Mr. Berglund does contribute to his team s physical play, he is a less physical player than Mr. Eller. In the 2013-2014 season, Mr. Berglund recorded 88 hits and 30 blocks. 46 Mr. Eller, as discussed above, contributed 130 hits and 58 blocks - making him one of the most important components of Montreal s physical play. 47 Finally, Mr. Eller has a much stronger record than Mr. Berglund in high-pressure situations. On the faceoff, for example, Mr. Eller had a 53.2% win rate as discussed above, compared to Mr. Berglund s 47.6%. 48 Mr. Berglund s scoring was also concentrated in games 39 Ibid. 40 Ibid. 41 Ibid. 42 Ibid. 43 Ibid. 44 Ibid. 45 Ibid. 46 Ibid. 47 Ibid. 48 Ibid. 7

where his team was already leading 8 out of his 14 total goals. 49 In contrast, all but one of Mr. Eller s 12 goals came when his team was either tied or trailing, meaning his offensive performances made much more of a contribution to his team s success in recording wins. 50 While Mr. Eller and Mr. Berglund are comparable players, Mr. Eller submits that his more significant contributions to his team s overall physical repertoire and playoff performance entitle him to a higher salary than the $3.7 midpoint that Mr. Berglund earns. 51 A slightly higher salary of $3.75 million per year would be fair in comparison to Mr. Berglund. III. CONCLUSION Mr. Eller fills a unique and indispensable physical role for the Montreal Canadiens. He has proven to be one of the most physical forwards on the team, and has contributed positively to his team s performance in the most important situations. Certainly, with the second-highest number of points recorded for Montreal in the 2013-2014 playoffs, Mr. Eller has proven himself as a diverse forward who is critical to both the offensive and defensive success of the team. Moreover, when comparing his overall performance to players earning an equal or higher salary, Mr. Eller s record reveals a more complete forward who produces team-leading physical statistics. Accordingly, Mr. Eller submits that a midpoint salary of $3.75 million is appropriate and just given his physical role, coupled with a well-rounded offensive and defensive performance in critical situations. 49 Ibid. 50 Ibid. 51 http://capgeek.com/player/964 8