Conservation and Management Plan for Sika Deer (Cervus nippon) in Eastern Hokkaido

Similar documents
Deer Management Unit 255

Deer Management Unit 252

021 Deer Management Unit

Deer Management Unit 152

Keywords: 7SI/Brown bear/harvest/harvest quota/hunting/malme/management/ mortality/population size/trend/ursus arctos

Report to the Joint Standing Committee on Inland Fisheries and Wildlife

Deer Management Unit 127

White-Tailed Deer Management FAQ

Deer and Deer Management in Central New York: Local Residents Interests and Concerns

CHECKS AND BALANCES. OVERVIEW Students become managers of a herd of animals in a paper-pencil, discussionbased

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

2015 Deer Population Goal Setting

Deer Management Unit 349

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Deer Management Unit 122

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Cariboo-Chilcotin (Region 5) Mule Deer: Frequently Asked Questions

DMU 056 Midland County Deer Management Unit

Monitoring Population Trends of White-tailed Deer in Minnesota Marrett Grund, Farmland Wildlife Populations and Research Group

DMU 006 Arenac County Deer Management Unit

Minnesota Deer Population Goals. East Central Uplands Goal Block

make people aware of the department s actions for improving the deer population monitoring system,

Minnesota Deer Population Goals

Full summaries of all proposed rule changes, including DMU boundary descriptions, are included in the additional background material.

Deer Management Unit 249

Minnesota Deer Population Goals

Findings and Guidelines Wednesday, March 12, 2003 Page 1

Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations

White-tailed Deer: A Review of the 2010 Provincially Coordinated Hunting Regulation

Enclosed, please find the 2018 Spotlight Deer Survey Report and Recommendations that we have prepared for your review and records.

Early History, Prehistory

Status Report on the Yellowstone Bison Population, August 2016 Chris Geremia 1, Rick Wallen, and P.J. White August 17, 2016

DMU 053 Mason County Deer Management Unit

SPOTLIGHT DEER SURVEY YO RANCHLANDS LANDOWNERS ASSOCIATION ±10,400 ACRES KERR COUNTY

April Nisga a Fisheries & Wildlife Department

DMU 065 Ogemaw County Deer Management Unit

Controlled Take (Special Status Game Mammal Chapter)

DMU 057 Missaukee County Deer Management Unit

Dauphin Lake Fishery. Status of Walleye Stocks and Conservation Measures

DMU 332 Huron, Sanilac and Tuscola Counties Deer Management Unit

IMPROVING POPULATION MANAGEMENT AND HARVEST QUOTAS OF MOOSE IN RUSSIA

Chesapeake Bay Jurisdictions White Paper on Draft Addendum IV for the Striped Bass Fishery Management Plan

City of Galena 2017 Deer Hunting Survey

Deer Management in Maryland. Brian Eyler Deer Project Leader Maryland DNR

Recommendations for Pennsylvania's Deer Management Program and The 2010 Deer Hunting Season

DMU 046 Lenawee County Deer Management Unit

DMU 043 Lake County Deer Management Unit

Iroquoia Heights Conservation Area White-tailed Deer Management Strategy

DMU 008 Barry County Deer Management Unit

DMU 361 Fremont Deer Management Unit Newaygo, Oceana, N. Muskegon Counties

Mule and Black-tailed Deer

COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report for Grizzly Bear Western population (Ursus arctos) in Canada SUMMARY

2017 LATE WINTER CLASSIFICATION OF NORTHERN YELLOWSTONE ELK

LEAPS BOUNDS. Growing up hunting as a kid in New Hampshire, I didn t. by Dan Bergeron

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PENTICTON COUNCIL REPORT. DATE: 9 th January 2012 RES:

Annual Report Ecology and management of feral hogs on Fort Benning, Georgia.

Chapter 14. Wildlife, Fisheries and Endangered Species. What are we Saving? Traditional Single-Species Wildlife Management

Mule deer in the Boundary Region: Proposed research and discussion

DMU 073 Saginaw County Deer Management Unit

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ON RESIDENT CANADA GOOSE MANAGEMENT Questions and Answers

ALTERNATIVE DEER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR GAME MANAGEMENT UNITS. 12A, 12B, 13A, 13B, 16A, 45A, 45B, 45C, and White-tailed Deer Units

IN PROGRESS BIG GAME HARVEST REPORTS FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH Energy and Resource Development

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS. Court File No. A Petitioners, Respondents.

Northern Yellowstone Cooperative Wildlife Working Group 2012 Annual Report (October 1, 2012-September 30, 2012) Member Agencies

Peace Region Wildlife Regulations Proposed Changes for Comment ( )

DMU 038 Jackson County

Marker, L. (2005). Aspects of ecology, biology and conservation strategies of Namibian farmland cheetahs. Animal Keeper's Forum 7/8.

MANAGED LANDS DEER PROGRAM INFORMATION. General Requirements

Life history Food Distribution Management... 98

2017 DEER HUNTING FORECAST

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUMMARY OF COUGAR POPULATION MODEL AND EFFECTS OF LETHAL CONTROL

IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS OF THE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION LAW. Authorized by the Republic of China Wildlife Conservation Law, amended October 29, 1994.

DMU 005 Antrim County Deer Management Unit

Minnesota Deer Population Goals. Sand Plain Big Woods Goal Block

Comprehensive Deer Management Program Montgomery County, MD. Rob Gibbs Natural Resources Manager M-NCPPC, Montgomery Dept of Parks

Wildlife Management. Wildlife Management. Geography 657

ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT GUIDELINES FOR THE AND HUNTING SEASONS

Population Ecology Yellowstone Elk by C. John Graves

COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 79/409/EC. of 2 April on the conservation of the wild birds

Modeling Population Decline

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUMMARY OF COUGAR MANAGEMENT IN NEIGHBORING STATES

Michigan Predator-Prey Project Phase 1 Preliminary Results and Management Recommendations. Study Background

Chagrin River TMDL Appendices. Appendix F

DEER AND ELK POPULATION STATUS AND HARVEST STRUCTURE IN WESTERN NORTH AMERICA: A SUMMARY OF STATE AND PROVINCIAL STATUS SURVEYS.

5/DMU 069 Otsego County Deer Management Unit

This game has been adapted from SECONDARY PROJECT WILD 1983, 1985

Key themes: To be able to identify and name different types of deer. To understand the lifecycle of a deer

RANCHING Wildlife. Texas White-Tailed Deer 2017 Hunting Forecast

Findings of the Alaska Board of Game BOG

Findings of the Alaska Board of Game BOG

Effects of Sage-grouse Hunting in Nevada. Nevada Board of Wildlife Commissioners August 13, 2011

DMU 047 Livingston County Deer Management Unit

DEER HUNT RESULTS ON ALABAMA WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREAS ANNUAL REPORT, CHRISTOPHER W. COOK STUDY LEADER MAY, 2006

Full Spectrum Deer Management Services

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Predator and Furbearer Management. SPECIES: Predatory and Furbearing Mammals

DMU 045 Leelanau County Deer Management Unit

Introduction to Pennsylvania s Deer Management Program. Christopher S. Rosenberry Deer and Elk Section Bureau of Wildlife Management

FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT

Management History of the Edwards Plateau

Transcription:

Conservation and Management Plan for Sika Deer (Cervus nippon) in Eastern Hokkaido

Foreward The island of Hokkaido is home to a diverse wildlife fauna characteristic of the northern regions. Prominent species include mammals such as the brown bear and sika deer, and birds like the Japanese crane and Blakiston s fish-owl. Although some species have declined in number and are threatened by extinction, others are thriving and their increasing numbers bring them into conflict with forestry, fishery, and other human activities. In order to promote the coexistence of humans and wildlife and the conservation of biological diversity, the Hokkaido government created Guidelines for the Conservation and Management of Wildlife in October, 1996. In addition to outlining general wildlife conservation policy, Hokkaido recommended the establishment of conservation and management programs for each of the major wildlife species. In the late 19 th century, sika deer numbers were greatly reduced by uncontrolled harvests and heavy snowfalls. Later restrictions on harvest and changes in habitat helped populations to recover, and in recent years expanding populations have caused increasing amounts of damage to agricultural and forestry products. In addition, bark peeling by deer has increased, causing sometimes dramatic changes in the natural forest ecosystems of eastern Hokkaido. In order to promote the conservation and management of deer populations and to prevent agriculture and forestry damages, the government of Hokkaido and other stakeholders convened a Council on Sika Deer Management Policy in June 1997. In this text we have attempted to summarize the subsequently developed policies as well as provide an outline of plans for implementing management of deer numbers in accord with the Guidelines for the Conservation and Management of Wildlife With this Conservation and Management Plan, the Hokkaido government will pursue the multiple goals of regulating deer numbers, ensuring habitat quality, and minimizing the conflicts between deer and human activities. We hope for the cooperative participation of all parties interested in a coexistence of people and sika deer. March 1998 Tadayoshi Konno, Director General, Department of Health and Environment, Hokkaido Government

Contents Chapter 1 Development of the Conservation and Management Plan for Sika Deer 1 Background 1 2 Purpose 2 3 Characteristics 2 Chapter 2 Population management 1 Basic concept of population management 4 2 Methods of population management 4 3 Implementation of management methods 8 Chapter 3 Field Research Surveys 10 Chapter 4 Toward a consensus on the Conservation and Management Plan 11 [References]

Chapter 1 Development of the Conservation and Management Plan for Sika Deer 1 Background Sika deer, one of the prominent elements of Hokkaido`s rich and diverse natural environment, were greatly reduced in number due to overexploitation and heavy snowfalls in the early days of the Meiji era. In 1888, hunting was banned throughout Hokkaido, helping the species return from the verge of extinction. In 1900 the ban was withdrawn, but because numbers again declined rapidly, hunting was prohibited throughout Hokkaido a second time in 1920. The subsequent gradual increase in deer numbers became increasingly apparent in damage to agriculture and forestry. Beginning in 1957, limited hunting of male deer was allowed in some districts. Since then, the hunting and no hunting districts have been subject to review and revision every three years. Despite the gradual relaxation of hunting regulations, favorable changes in deer habitat have allowed deer numbers and distribution to increase, and substantial damages to agriculture and forestry have arisen in recent years. Etimated total damages attributed to deer in Hokkaido amounted to over 5 billion yen (30 milion US dollars) in fiscal 1996, of which the Abashiri, Tokachi, Kushiro, and Nemuro subprefectures (hereafter referred to as eastern Hokkaido ) accounted for 4.2 billion yen. In response to such heavy damages, hunting regulations were relaxed even further. Beginning in 1994, the harvest of female deer, which had been banned nationwide, was allowed in some districts, and hunting of deer was allowed in a previously protected wintering area near Lake Akan in 1995. As a result the total harvest of deer, including both sports hunting and damage control actions, increased dramatically. In fiscal 1996, the total reached 46,000 of which 40,000 were taken in eastern Hokkaido. Unfortunately, this still did not contribute much to the reduction of damages to agriculture and forestry, and in the native forests understory plants have declined and larger trees have been damaged by bark peeling deer. Since 1984, the Hokkaido government supported research projects to assess population distribution, age and sex structures, and nutritional condition of harvested deer. This fundamental data on the ecology of the sika deer has become the base from which the decision to allow the harvest of females and other aspects of the management plan were developed. The following are examples of research findings: Sika deer are widely distributed in central and eastern Hokkaido. Eastern Hokkaido, where snowfall is limited and there is an abundant supply of Miyakozasa (Sasa nipponica Makino) and Kumaizasa (Sasa senanensis) is the heart of sika deer range. 2

The estimated number of sika deer inhabiting eastern Hokkaido is approximately 120,000 ( 46,000 90%CL) (as of March 1994). Sika deer migrate widely with the seasons, gathering in wintering areas where snow-fall is limited and coniferous forests offer good thermal cover The sika deer of eastern Hokkaido exhibit the characteristics of an expanding population: there are many young deer, fertility is high, and nutritional condition of the deer is good. By clarifying the ecological needs of sika deer, the results of this research effort have made it possible to carry out a coordinated conservation and management program. 2 Purpose This management plan is designed to promote a coexistence between sika deer and people in eastern Hokkaido, the heart of deer range on the island. This will be accomplished by minimizing the conflicts between human activities and sika deer, managing stable deer populations to ensure the long term availability of high quality habitat, and implementing conservation of the deer as a natural resource of the people of Hokkaido. 3 Characteristics As a measure to implement coordinated conservation and management of major wildlife species of Hokkaido, this management plan is based upon the Guidelines for the Conservation and Management of Wildlife in Hokkaido (established October, 1996). The plan describes the basic approach and proposed means of managing sika deer numbers in eastern Hokkaido. This plan builds upon the work of the Hokkaido government-sponsored Council on Sika Deer Management Policy, convened in 1997 to consider and recommend options for a comprehensive deer conservation and management plan. The council reviewed proposals to prevent damages to agriculture and forestry, and to encourage use of the deer as a renewable natural resource. Specific attention was given to the monitoring and regulation of deer numbers, the erection of fences to prevent deer access to farm lands, the application of deer repellants in plantation forests, and the development of a distribution system and market for venison. This plan proposes a target level for deer population management in eastern Hokkaido, to be coordinated with other comprehensive measures for the management of sika deer. This plan will be implemented with the cooperative input of the national and local government interests and the people of Hokkaido. It will be reviewed and revised as necessary in accordance with the results of further research and monitoring efforts. 3

Chapter 2 Population Management 1 Basic concept of population management To manage sika deer population numbers, population indices based on trends in agriculture and forestry damage and deer harvest characteristics will be used as feedback systems to adjust harvest rates. Although sika deer populations can increase rapidly in favorable habitats, they can also crash under bad environmental conditions such as heavy snow. Accordingly, deer populations will be managed with attention to these ecological characteristics, based on previous research results and a growing body of science. Under this plan, efforts will be made to minimize conflicts between deer and human activities, and population numbers will be managed by hunting and damage control harvests to ensure the persistence of stable and healthy populations. For effective wildlife management, in addition to knowing population numbers, life history information (life span, survival and reproductive rates) becomes important, but there are no wildlife species for which such complete information is available. With that in mind, population indices, or measures of population status based upon available research results, will be used to monitor and manage sika deer. Under a feedback management system observed changes in these indices will be used to recognize when populations are increasing or declining, and to signal a need for adjustments in harvest pressure. 2 Methods of population management As a basis for feed-back management, a population index standard of 100 was assigned to the conditions reported in 1993 field surveys and the March, 1994 estimate of 120,000 deer in the four eastern subprefectures of Hokkaido. Harvest pressure will be adjusted based upon the comprehensive monitoring of these indices. Population status will be described in one of three general conditions, based upon the relative level of the indices: critical threshold (5 %), irruption threshold (50%), or optimal level (25%). One of four management responses will be applied annually according to population status: an emergency culling, gradual population reductions, gradual population increases, or a ban of hunting. (1) Population incluces Population indices were derived from data collected in helicopter and spotlight surveys, records of catch or observation per unit effort, levels of agriculture and forestry damage, the occurrence of collisions between trains and deer, and other measures. 4

The estimated number of sika deer inhabiting eastern Hokkaido in March, 1994 (120,000 46,000) was assigned as the reference population size for the index standard of 100. (2) Monitoring trends of the population indeces The population indeces are based on results from the following surveys: 1: Helicopter census In March of each year, a helicoptor is used for an aerial count of deer in the Shiranuka foothils study area (Akan town, Shiranuka town, Onbetsu town), a major wintering grounds for sika deer in eastern Hokkaido. 2: Spotlight census Nighttime vehicle spotlight counts of deer numbers are made in Tokachi subprefecture study area (Rikubetsu town, Ashoro town, Honbetsu town, Urahoro town) and Kushiro subprefecture study area (Kushiro city, Teshikaga city, Shibecha town, Akan town, Shiranuka town, Onbetsu town, Tsurui village) 3: Catch per unit effort Records of number of hunting days, hunting area, observations, and harvests of deer are collected from hunter surveys and used to estimate catch per unit effort and frequency of observation. 4: Value of agriculture and forestry damage Estimates of agriculture and forestry damage caused by deer are gathered from the annual Wildlife Damages Statistics report. 5: Number of railway accidents involving the deer The number of collisions between deer and trains are estimated from surveys by JR Hokkaido railway. 5

(3) Three levels of management standards 1: Critical threshold In its guidelines for managing species threatened with extinction, the IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources) recognizes a population of 1000 animals as the critical size below which genetic diversity declines. On Hokkaido, heavy snow years that have been associated with herd losses as high as 50% recur once every twenty years. Recognizing the possibility of two consecutive harsh winters, this management plan establishes a critical population index threshold (Index = 5) equivalent to an estimated population of 6,000 deer. 2: Irruption threshold A population index of 50 (60,000 deer) is considered to signal a potential population irruption. This level is thought to represent the number of deer in the area in 1985, when damage by deer to agriculture, forestry, and natural forests approached levels that raised broad public concern. 3: Optimal level The optimal level represents an intermediate target for managing deer numbers in the range between the critical threshold and the irruption threshold. Recognizing that sustaining a stable population of any wildlife species can be difficult, and that weather conditions and other factors can cause dramatic changes in population sizes, the optimal index level of 25 (30,000 deer) is designed to ensure that the population does not approach the critical threshold. (4) Four management responses 1: Emergency culling Emergency culling will be carried out when the current population indeces are well above the irruption threshold. Liberal harvests by hunting and control kill actions will be encouraged to reduce populations to levels below that of the irruption threshold. It is recognized, however, that the effects of liberal harvests may not be apparent in lower birth rates until several years later, and that persistently high harvest rates become excessive. For that reason, emergency culling will only be carried out over the course of a few years. 2: Gradual population reductions In cases where the preceding year s snowfall was normal but the current population indeces are above the optimal level, harvest pressure will be increased to bring about a gradual decline in deer numbers. 6

3: Gradual population increases In cases where the preceding year s snowfall was normal but the current population indeces are below the optimal level, harvest pressure will be decreased to bring about a gradual increase in deer numbers 4: Hunting bans In cases where the current population indeces are below the critical threshold, hunting will be prohibited, and damage control harvests will be minimized to allow the deer population to increase. Furthermore, for the year following a heavy snowfall, trends in the population indeces of recent years will be noted, and the need for a ban on hunting will be considered. Four Management Responses Classification Population Index Range Remarks 1:Emergency culling 50 (60,000 deer)< Population index Approx. 3 years 2:Gradual population reduction 25 (30,000 deer)< Population index 50 (60,000 deer) 3:Gradual population increase 5 ( 6,000 deer)< Population index 25 (30,000 deer) 4:Hunting bans Population index 5 ( 6,000 deer) Concept Diagram for the Management of Population Size 100 (120,000 deer) Emergency culling Population index 50 (60,000 deer) 25 (30,000 deer) 5 (6,000 deer) Irruption threshold Optimal level Critical threshold Gradual population reduction Gradual population increase Hunting ban 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 7

3 Implementation of management actions Sika deer population size in eastern Hokkaido will be managed by encouraging hunting and proactive damage control harvests. During emergency culling and gradual population reduction periods, emphasis will be placed on female harvest, which has a strong influence on the adjustment of population numbers. Emphasis on the harvest of male deer during periods to promote gradual population increase will lead toward a stable harvest. Because the current population indeces of sika deer in eastern Hokkaido are well above the irruption threshold, three years of emergency culling will be carried out. Based upon observed changes in the population indeces in the following years, harvest rates will be adjusted to bring population size near the proposed optimal level. In fiscal 1997, the population indeces of sika deer in the eastern district of Hokkaido were 101 by spotlight census and 108 by helicopter census. As these indices are well above the irruption threshold, emergency culling will be carried out for three consecutive years. Implementation of this plan depends upon the understanding and cooperation of hunters and those called upon to carry out damage control kills. By increasing female harvest pressure, the plan seeks to reduce population numbers to a level below the irruption threshold.. (1) Implementing an immediate emergency culling In order to promote higher harvest rates, more hunting areas will be open to female harvests and hunting seasons may be extended. Further, a request will be made to the national government for an exception to the standard bag limit of one deer per hunter per day. Support will also be provided to the cities, towns, villages, and hunters associations whose cooperative support will be needed to implement damage control harvests and ensure the success of such an emergency culling. (Summaries of harvest data from the four subprefectures of eastern Hokkaido and the results of previous research surveys used in the development of this plan are appended in Reference Materials). 8

(2) Appropriate guidance on hunting Increasing the number of areas open to hunting and extending the hunting season will likely attract a large number of hunters to the region. The Hokkaido government will cooperate closely with local governments and the police to provide information and guidance and to prevent accidents and respond to illegal activity that may arise. Also, hunters will be encouraged to handle and remove harvested animals properly. 9

Chapter 3 Field Research Surveys With the adoption of a feed-back management system, a firm grasp of population indices becomes indispensable. Under the current plan, the impacts of hunting and damage control harvests on the deer population will be monitored continually. Moreover, to improve the understanding of sika deer life history traits, research will be conducted to ascertain age distribution, fecundity, seasonal movements, and favored habitat characteristics. (1) Survey of trends in population indices : Helicopter and spotlight census activities will be continued to provide measures of the population indices that are the bases for feedback management. (2) Analysis of harvested deer Lower jaw bones and other parts collected from harvested deer will be analyzed for information on age distribution, nutritional condition, and reproduction. This information will then be used to consider population trends. (3) Telemetry marking survey Sika deer seasonal movements, causes of mortality, and other ecologial characteristics will be assessed by capture, mark, and release radio telemetry studies. (4) Habitat surveys Measures of carrying capacity, derived from studies of vegetation condition and food availability, will be incorporated in plans to conserve forested habitats. (5) Harvest surveys Surveys of hunter effort and success will be conducted to gather information used in the adjustment of hunting district boundaries and season lengths. (6) Survey of impacts on agriculture and forestry Surveys will be conducted to assess the relationship between sika deer population status and impacts on agriculture and forestry. 10

Chapter 4 Toward a Consensus for Conservation and Management For this management plan to proceed, it will be essential to elicit the understanding and cooperation of local residents and the Hokkaido public at large. Toward this end, the relevant governments, organizations, and individuals will work closely toward a consensus on the implementation of each measure. Promptly reported research and monitoring survey results, combined with the findings of the Council on Sika Deer Management Policy and local public input, will be used in the establishment of hunting seasons and damage control efforts deemed necessary to manage deer populations appropriately. Furthermore, research specialists and management professionals will be consulted in the periodic review of these research and monitoring surveys. 11

Reference Materials 12

Areas Included in the Conservation and Management Plan For Sika Deer in Eastern Hokkaido Soya subprefecture Shiribeshi subprefecture Rumoi subprefecture Ishikari subprefecture Sorachi subprefecture Kamikawa subprefecture Abashiri subprefecture Tokachi subprefecture Kushiro subprefecture Nemuro subprefecture Iburi subprefecture Hidaka subprefecture Hiyama subprefecture Oshima subprefecture Eastern District of Hokkaido 13

Changes in Population Index Values for Sika Deer in Eastern Hokkaido Population. Index 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 Helicopter census - - - 100 - - 133 108 Spotlight census - - 68 100 72 115 127 101 Harvests/Hunter/day 68 71 91 100 112 144 141 Observations/Hunter/day 53 44 66 100 83 121 112 Level of agriculture/forestry 59 71 83 100 100 122 151 damage Railway accident 46 71 64 100 109 106 178 Population index 200 150 100 Helicopter census Light census Harvest/Hunter/day Observation/Hunter/day Level of agriculture and forestry damage Railway accidents 50 0 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 Fiscal year Proposed Female Harvest Levels and Projected Population Index Response Fiscal year 1998 1999 2000 2001 Proposed level of female harvest 26,000-36,000 22,000-24,000 16,000-18,000 10,000-15,000 Projected population index 60-90 40-60 Remarks Life history characteristics used in the calculation of proposed harvest levels 1 Mean survival rate Male Female Fawn Ordinary snowfall year 0.85 0.90 0.70 Heavy snowfall year 0.20 0.45 0.20 (Heavy snow accumulates once in 20 years) 2 Pregnancy rate 0.90 3 Female fawn per doe ratio: 0.425 4 Adult sex ratio Male : Female = 4 : 10 Proposed harvest levels will be adjusted annually based upon previous years harvests. 14

Changes in Sika Deer Harvests and the Value of Damage Harvest number(head) Control killed female Control killed male Hunted female Hunted male Value of damage Value of damage(million yen) 1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Fiscal year Total harvest = hunting harvest + control kill harvest. 15

Sika Deer Harvest and the Value of Damage to Agriculture and Forestry Fiscal Hunting Damage control kills Hunting + control Value of Remarks year Male Femal e Total Male Femal e Total Male Femal e Total damage (million yen) 1957 278 278 142 142 420 420 62 Male hunting season reopened. 1958 372 372 189 189 561 561 48 1959 434 434 229 229 663 663 39 1960 552 552 211 211 763 763 42 1961 1,170 1,170 333 333 1,503 1,503 39 1962 1,528 1,528 301 301 1,829 1,829 48 1963 1,526 1,526 722 722 2,248 2,248 41 1964 2,503 2,503 656 656 3,159 3,159 26 1965 2,494 2,494 737 737 3,231 3,231 31 1966 1,688 1,688 658 658 2,346 2,346 34 1967 2,225 2,225 407 407 2,632 2,632 33 1968 1,876 1,876 392 392 2,268 2,268 22 1969 2,693 2,693 215 215 2,908 2,908 23 1970 2,175 2,175 130 130 2,305 2,305 29 1971 1,772 1,772 41 41 1,813 1,813 24 1972 3,563 3,563 113 113 3,676 3,676 22 1973 1,207 1,207 99 99 1,306 1,306 30 1974 1,279 1,279 115 115 1,394 1,394 42 1975 1,415 1,415 173 173 1,588 1,588 56 1976 2,577 2,577 239 239 2,816 2,816 103 Subprefectures given authority to allow control kill of males. 1977 2,340 2,340 231 231 2,571 2,571 229 1978 2,959 2,959 306 306 3,265 3,265 163 1979 2,495 2,495 372 372 2,867 2,867 168 1980 2,839 2,839 550 80 630 3,389 80 3,469 179 1981 2,989 2,989 644 124 768 3,633 124 3,757 327 1982 3,816 3,816 698 134 832 4,514 134 4,648 307 1983 4,855 4,855 847 308 1,155 5,702 308 6,010 397 1984 4,515 4,515 1,072 380 1,452 5,587 380 5,967 485 1985 4,961 4,961 1,399 451 1,850 6,360 451 6,811 487 1986 6,149 6,149 1,741 769 2,510 7,890 769 8,659 557 1987 4,989 4,989 2,084 892 2,976 7,073 892 7,965 753 1988 9,579 9,579 2,018 1,008 3,026 11,597 1,008 12,605 1,408 1989 9,676 9,676 2,204 1,897 4,101 11,880 1,897 13,777 1,459 Subprefectures given authority to allow control kill of females. 1990 9,607 9,607 3,528 2,999 6,527 13,135 2,999 16,134 2,028 1991 10,596 10,596 4,002 3,521 7,523 14,598 3,521 18,119 2,323 1992 12,758 12,758 4,350 3,998 8,348 17,108 3,998 21,106 2,505 1993 16,402 16,402 5,445 4,996 10,441 21,847 4,996 26,843 3,439 1994 15,723 2,272 17,995 5,568 5,359 10,927 21,291 7,631 28,922 3,384 Female hunting season reopens 1995 22,342 3,197 25,539 7,603 4,401 15,004 29,945 10,598 40,543 4,056 1996 19,610 3,312 22,922 11,540 12,172 23,712 31,150 15,484 46,634 5,005 Major damaged crops: pasture, beet, wheat. 16

Maximum Snow Depth on the Kushiro Plains (cm) 140 120 100 80 Heavy Snow Years are those with snow depths greater than 80cm. 60 40 20 0 1911 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 81 86 Snow depth on the Kushiro Plains is below 80cm in a typical year. Heavy snow years, defined by depths of 80cm or more, are expected to occur once in twenty years. Source: Weather in Hokkaido Hokkaido Branch, Japan Weather and Meteorology Association (1991) 17

Changes in the Distribution of Sika Deer 1978 1984 1991 1997 : Areas where signs of deer presence were observed. 18

Conservation and Management Plan for Sika Deer in Eastern Hokkaido Published by: Hokkaido Government Edited by: Natural Environment Division, Office of Environment Affairs, Department of Health and Environment, Hokkaido Government Kita 3-jo Nishi 6-chome, Chuo-ku, Sapporo City, Hokkaido 060-8588 Japan TEL +81+11-231-4111 Ext. 24-391 FAX +81+11-231-6790 Printed and issued: May 1998 19