Off-gassing from III-V Wafer Processing -- A Collaboration of SEMATECH and IMEC

Similar documents
SAFE WORK PROCEDURE:

Honeywell Analytics. December 2, Overview of Gas Detection Capabilities. IH Considerations for a TGMS

Improved Sputter Depth Resolution in Auger Thin Film Analysis Using In Situ Low Angle Cross-Sections

Phosgene Sensor. Sensoric COCl2 3E 1

METHOD 2E - DETERMINATION OF LANDFILL GAS PRODUCTION FLOW RATE. NOTE: This method does not include all of the

Using Vaporized Hydrogen Peroxide

acrolein, acetaldehyde and acetone( cm -1 ); methanol (1306 cm -1 ); ethylene (949 cm -1 ); and isoprene (893 cm -1 ).

Gravimetric preparation of NO 2 primary reference gas mixtures at the NMISA. Tshepiso Mphamo 03 September 2012

METHOD 21 - DETERMINATION OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND LEAKS. 1.2 Scope. This method is applicable for the

Design and Technology Solutions for Development of SiGeMEMS devices. Tom Flynn Vice President, Sales Coventor

Appendix D: SOP of INNOVA 1412 Photoacoustic Multi-Gas Monitor. Description and Principle of Operation

Evaluating Surface Wettability for SET-NA Ontos7 Atmospheric Plasma Treated Samples

VLSI Design I; A. Milenkovic 1

how to meet today s dissolved oxygen specifications with degasification membranes

Manufacturing Processes for WSi 2 -GPSOI Substrates and their Influence on Cross-talk Suppression and Inductance

HCL MONITORING. ICAC MARAMA WORKSHOP May 18-19th, Presented by: Ty Smith. CEMTEK

Detector Tubes and Badges

Plasma-Therm PECVD. Operating Characteristics. Operating Instructions. Typical Processes. I. Loading. II. Operating

Contamination Removal of EUVL masks and optics using 13.5-nm and 172-nm radiation

Safety Data Sheet 1432BR

Model GFC 7000T CO 2 Analyzer (Addendum to GFC 7000TA Manual, PN 07272)

Material Safety Data Sheet

SAFETY DATA SHEET. P.O. Box 4272 CHEMTREC: (800) Houston, TX KRONOS: (800) Customer Service: (800)

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET EM SCIENCE 1. CHEMICAL PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION

Industrial Hygiene Sampling. Husqvarna Construction Products

INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE GROUP Standard Operating Procedure. TVA-1000 PID/FID Portable Toxic Vapor analyzer. 1 of 9. Contents

GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S. INC. Air Dispersion Modeling - FAB 8 Campus C.T. Male Project No.:

EUV Mask Handling Standards

Elimination of Percent Level H 2 S Calibration Gas from Flare Gas Monitoring Systems Measuring Total Sulfur, H 2 S and BTU.

Generating Calibration Gas Standards

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

Addressing the World Shortage of Helium

Notes-PECVD: Chamber 1

Safety Data Sheet MasterTop SRS 40TC also DEGADUR 410 Revision date : 2013/12/20 Page: 1/6

SAFETY DATA SHEET according to Regulation (EC) No. 453/2010 Dental Use

Commercial Practice Test Method Internal Vapor Analysis of Hermetic Devices

Hohmann & Barnard, Inc. Material Safety Data Sheet *** Copper Flashing & Mastic ***

DSC 204 HP Phoenix. High-Pressure Differential Scanning Calorimetry up to 15 MPa Method, Technique and Applications

: Aluminum Oxide, hydrate; Activated Alumina. 1.2 Relevant identified uses of the substance or mixture and uses advised against

Application Note. ASTRON Remote Plasma Source Ignition Best Practices PROBLEM

EUV Resist Performance under High Stray Light Levels: an Interference Lithography Study

What I have learned about SF 6 gas testing.a Practical explanation

Measuring mass flows in hermetically sealed MEMs & MOEMs to ensure device reliability

SAFETY DATA SHEET. Date of Preparation: 06/17/2014 SDS #: MSDS

Material Safety Data Sheet

CPE/EE 427, CPE 527 VLSI Design I IC Manufacturing. The MOS Transistor

MSDS Cover Sheet 004/16802/02MSDS SEDISPERSE A-12, (1-L) BOTTLE 004/16802/02MSDS. X of 5

Degassing ERC KK Saitama, Japan

FOUP material influence on HF contamination during queue-time

McIlvaine Company Hot Topic Hour. April 9, Dry Sorbent Injection Options and Issues

Hydrogen Sulfide - Health Effects, Detection and Exposure Prevention

LINEAR TRANSFORMATION APPLIED TO THE CALIBRATION OF ANALYTES IN VARIOUS MATRICES USING A TOTAL HYDROCARBON (THC) ANALYZER

Safety Data Sheet Silicon carbide (SiC) According to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006

2235 Cornell Avenue, Montgomery, IL Phone: (800) SAFETY DATA SHEET - 29 CFR

KEYSTONE WATER BASED STAINLESS STEEL POLISH. Use only for the purpose on the product label.

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

San Francisco Sewer. Water. October 3, 2011

Silver ( )* ~ ND No No No Arcosolve PM ( ) Toluene ( ) ** 200 PPM 20 PPM No 3 No ** 1000 PPM

SAFETY DATA SHEET. Date of Preparation: 06/12/2014 SDS #: MSDS

Guide to Gas Detection in Healthcare in the United States. 300 Business Center Dr. Suite 330 Pittsburgh, PA 15205

Material Safety Data Sheet for: Trimethylsilane [(CH 3 ) 3 SiH] In an emergency, call CHEMTREC at or

Real-time Analysis of Industrial Gases with Online Near- Infrared Spectroscopy

Advanced Imaging Techniques for Structural Health Monitoring

A NOVEL SENSOR USING REMOTE PLASMA EMISSION SPECTROSCOPY FOR MONITORING AND CONTROL OF VACUUM WEB COATING PROCESSES

Innovative gas and outgassing analysis and monitoring

Laser Spectrometers for Online Moisture Measurement in Natural Gas. Ken Soleyn GE M&C

Safety Data Sheet Revised 16 November 2015

X-Flow Mass Flow Controller 授权代理 : 北京品超思瑞科技学院公司

This test shall be carried out on all vehicles equipped with open type traction batteries.

EMISSION CHAMBERS. Bulk and Surface Emission Detection for the RAD7 User Manual

ENVIRONMENTAL AND POLLUTANTS GAS ANALYZERS

March CS-1701F Reactive Ion Etcher

Material Safety Data Sheet

PENETRATION OF N95 FILTERING- FACEPIECE RESPIRATORS BY CHARGED AND CHARGE- NEUTRALIZED NANOPARTICLES

Precision Calibration Gas

Intended Use of Product: For R&D materials science use only, not intended for drug or household use.

Residual Gas Analysis Systems for Industry

FACILIPRO PEROXIDE GLASS AND SURFACE CLEANER. Use only for the purpose on the product label.

NUTC R285. Effect of Trona on the Leaching of Trace Elements from Coal Fly Ash. Jianmin Wang, Ph.D., P.E. Honglan Shi, Ph.D.

Material Safety Data Sheet

Product No: 121 Thread Seal Tape, Gray Print date: 7/28/15 Version: 2.4 Page 1 of 9 Revision date: 7/28/2015

Major Design Features

5.1.3 Mechanical Hazards Drive assemblies have sufficient power to cause injury. Keep hands, fingers, clothing and tools clear of moving parts.

SECTION 1: IDENTIFICATION

Single Point Continuous Gas Monitor

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET Real Wood Cohesive Urethane Wood Flooring Adhesive - Plus Moisture Barrier

Safety Data Sheet. Revision Date: November, 16 th 2017 Issue Date: January 25, Product and Company Identification

Carnegie Mellon University. Toxic and Highly Toxic Gas Handling Program

Material Safety Data Sheet

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

Peroxiwash. Safety Data Sheet SECTION 1. IDENTIFICATION. Peroxiwash Concentrated Animal Shampoo. Product Identifier: Recommended Use

Leaks, contamination and closed loop control how RGAs make coating processes more profitable

SMART Pad for CMP. Sunghoon Lee 1, David A. Dornfeld 1 Hae Do Jeong 2. University of California, Berkeley, USA 2

1. Compute the TWA for the following respirable dust exposures:

PLASMA ENHANCED CHEMICAL VAPOR DEPOSITION (PECVD) SOP OXFORD PLASMALAB SYSTEM 100

Safety Data Sheet 1921SYM

Bruce Seale, Acting Manager Pretreatment Program Wastewater Enterprise / Collection System Division

FTIR Detection of Outgassing Chemicals: Instantaneous and Comprehensive Identification and Quantitation

Operation of the Perkin Elmer TGA-GC/MS

2.1 Classification of the substance or mixture The substance is not classified as hazardous according to the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

Transcription:

Off-gassing from III-V Wafer Processing -- A Collaboration of SEMATECH and IMEC CMPUG Spring Meeting Albany, NY April 16, 2015 Hsi-An Kwong, P.E. Alain Pardon Steve Trammell, P.E. SEMATECH IMEC EORM hsi-an.kwong@sematech.org Alain.Pardon@imec.be trammells@eorm.com SEMATECH, Inc. SEMATECH, SEMATECH, Inc. and the SEMATECH logo are registered service marks of SEMATECH, Inc. All other service marks and trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

Technology Outlook Manufacturing Development Research SiGe Stressors High- /Metal Gate Bulk FinFETs / FD-SOI SiGe Channels Ge Channels ET-SOI Ge/III-V FinFETs Vertical NW TFET 2D Spin SiGe Stressors: INTEL High- /Metal Gate: TSMC SiGe Channel: SEMATECH III-V FET: SEMATECH MoS 2 : EPFL III-V Fins: SEMATECH Ge FinFET: TSMC Spintronics: IBM FD-SOI: GLOBALFOUNDRIES Bulk FinFETs: INTEL TFET: SEMATECH 45 nm / 32 nm / 22 nm 14 nm / 10 nm 7 nm / 5 nm / 3 nm SEMATECH 2

Experiment Goals CMP polishing: Quantify and identify species off-gassing during CMP using analytical instrumentation. CM4 has been used in the past but analytical instrumentation adds considerably more information Differences in off-gassing due to III-V layer composition? Off-gassing influenced by slurry composition? Evaluate whether off-gassing of III-V CMP wafers is a health & safety issue Wafer off-gassing in FOUP environment: Can we identify off-gassing of III-V layers in FOUPS? Is there any ESH concern or issue? SEMATECH and IMEC COLLABORATION 3

Experiment Goals Evaluate off-gassing of III-V wafers: InP, GaAs, and InGaAs. Off-gassing testing for two activities/areas: In Front Opening Unified Pods (FOUPs) During CMP polishing process at a CMP tool Joint experiment was performed at IMEC in Leuven, Belgium in November 2014. SEMATECH and IMEC COLLABORATION 4

FTIR and CM4 Techniques Identify the species of the off-gassing by using Fourier Transform Infra Red Spectroscopy (FTIR) as the analytical tool. MKS 2030 FTIR FTIR Detection Limits AsH 3 (ppmv) PH 3 (ppmv) SiH 4 (ppmv) Runs 1,2,3 0.011 0.117 0.010 Runs 4,5 0.010 0.119 0.012 CM4 gas monitor was used as a monitoring instrument during the tests. SEMATECH and IMEC COLLABORATION 5

Off-gassing in FOUPs Objective: Evaluate PH 3 and AsH 3 emissions off InP and GaAs wafers in wafer FOUPs after MOCVD deposition Evaluate off-gassing recurrence over time SEMATECH and IMEC COLLABORATION 6

Port Configuration on the Modified FOUPs SEMATECH and IMEC COLLABORATION 7

FOUP Test Setup and Description Test Name FOUP ID Wafer Substrate Test Description Gas Content (# Wfrs) Experimental Setup Test 1 2 InP 1 st InP (fresh wafers) Ambient Air 3 Test 2 1 GaAs 1 st GaAs (fresh wafers) Ambient Air 3 Extractive via CM4 pump Extractive via CM4 pump Test 3 2 InP 2 nd InP (Same wafers as Test #1, 24-hrs later) Ambient Air 3 Extractive via CM4 pump Test 4 2 InP 3 rd InP (same wafers as Test #3, 48-hrs later) Ambient Air 3 Extractive via CM4 pump Test 5 3 InP 4 th InP (Fresh InP wafers) Ambient Air 10 Extractive via CM4 pump SEMATECH and IMEC COLLABORATION 8

FOUP Test Results Test Name Wafer Substrate Test Description Test 1 InP Extractive Test 2 GaAs Extractive Test 3 Test 4 Test 5 InP InP 10 Fresh InP Wfrs Extractive (24 hours after Test #3) Extractive (24 hours after Test #5) Fresh InP wafers Arsine Phosphine Phosphine Silane Concentration By-FTIR By-FTIR By-CM4 * By-FTIR Statistic (ppmv) (ppmv) (ppmv) (ppmv) Minimum BDL BDL 0.0001 BDL Maximum BDL 0.432 0.457 BDL Average BDL 0.176 0.219 BDL MDL 0.014 0.117 NA 0.016 Minimum BDL BDL NA BDL Maximum BDL BDL NA BDL Average BDL BDL NA BDL MDL 0.012 0.104 NA 0.014 Minimum BDL BDL 0.0001 BDL Maximum BDL 0.218 0.199 BDL Average BDL 0.088 0.106 BDL MDL 0.01 0.091 NA 0.014 Minimum BDL BDL 0.037 BDL Maximum BDL BDL 0.139 BDL Average BDL BDL 0.089 BDL MDL 0.009 0.125 NA 0.017 Minimum BDL BDL 0.0002 BDL Maximum BDL 0.358 0.508 BDL Average BDL 0.203 0.316 BDL MDL 0.009 0.125 NA 0.017 x x x * CM4 was set to interpret the chemical tape s response as phosphine. SEMATECH and IMEC COLLABORATION 9

FOUP Test 5 10 Fresh InP Wafers CM4 and FTIR Gas Conc / ppb 600 Since ½ *MDL was used to replace BDL data for averaging purposes, the FTIR concentration baseline resides at ½*MDL instead of zero. 500 400 CM4 FTIR 300 200 100 0 Time Concentrations of PH 3 from a previously sealed FOUP containing 10 Fresh InP wafers measured via CM4 and FTIR. SEMATECH and IMEC COLLABORATION 10

Summary - Off-gassing from FOUP AsH 3 was below FTIR detection limit of 11 ppb during the FOUP off-gassing tests, and below the CM4 detection limit The presence of PH 3 off-gassing inside the FOUP is detected by FTIR at a level of >>300ppb o Off-gassing of PH 3 from the InP wafers was observed after 24 hours of setting time. The off-gassing of the wafers appears to dissipate over time; the off-gassing issue in the manufacturing process needs ESH attention. Further studies are on-going. SEMATECH and IMEC COLLABORATION 11

Off-gassing during CMP Objective: Evaluate hydride off-gassing during III-V CMP Slurries with different ph values and different hydrogen peroxide concentrations III-V layered wafers (GaAs, InGaAs, InP) SEMATECH and IMEC COLLABORATION 12

Off-gassing during CMP Run 1: Parameters: Slurry A, 150 ml/min, ph4, additive 1.5% H 2 O 2 Run Material Polishing Time[s] 1 InP 150 1 InP 150 1 InP 150 1 oxide 60 1 oxide 60 1 InGaAs 120 1 InGaAs 120 1 oxide 60 1 oxide 60 1 GaAs 180 1 GaAs 180 1 oxide 60 1 oxide 60 1 Si 120 1 Si 120 1 Si 120 SEMATECH and IMEC COLLABORATION 13

Off-gassing during CMP Run 1: Parameters: Slurry A, 150 l/ml, ph4, additive 1.5% H 2 O 2 Test results: Wafer Type InP InGaAs GaAs Si Oxide Wafer Number Run 1 FTIR Concentration Summary (ppmv) AsH3 (ppmv) PH3 (ppmv) SiH4 (ppmv) Min Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg 1 BDL BDL BDL BDL 0.252 0.176 BDL BDL BDL 2 BDL BDL BDL BDL 0.313 0.153 BDL BDL BDL 3 BDL BDL BDL BDL 0.263 0.162 BDL BDL BDL Average BDL BDL BDL BDL 0.276 0.164 BDL BDL BDL 6 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 7 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 10 BDL 0.024 0.008 BDL BDL BDL BDL 0.016 0.007 11 BDL 0.019 0.007 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL Average BDL 0.022 0.008 BDL BDL BDL BDL 0.016 0.007 14 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 15 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 0.016 0.009 16 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 0.019 0.010 Average BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 0.017 0.010 4 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 5 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 8 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 9 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 12 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 13 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL overpolishing to silicon layer SEMATECH and IMEC COLLABORATION 14

Off-gassing during CMP Run 1: InP Wafer Off-gassing Readings: CM4 and FTIR Gas Conc / ppb 400.0 350.0 300.0 250.0 200.0 150.0 100.0 50.0 0.0 CM4 FTIR Time FTIR (blue) and CM4 (red) concentration readings of PH 3 during CMP Run 1 using InP wafers (wafers 1, 2, and 3) SEMATECH and IMEC COLLABORATION 15

Off-gassing during CMP Run 2: Parameters: Slurry A, 150 ml/l, ph4, additive 3% H 2 O 2 Run Material Polishing Time[s] 2 oxide 60 2 oxide 60 2 oxide 60 2 oxide 60 2 InP 150 2 InP 150 2 InP 150 2 oxide 60 2 oxide 60 2 InGaAs 120 2 InGaAs 120 2 oxide 60 2 oxide 60 2 GaAs 90 2 GaAs 90 2 oxide 60 2 oxide 60 2 Si 60 2 Si 60 2 Si 60 SEMATECH and IMEC COLLABORATION 16

Off-gassing during CMP Run 2: Parameters: Slurry A, 150 ml/l, ph4, additive 3% H 2 O 2 Test results: Wafer Type InP InGaAs GaAs Si Oxide Run 2 FTIR Concentration Summary AsH3 (ppmv) PH3 (ppmv) SiH4 (ppmv) Wafer Number Min Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg 1 BDL BDL BDL BDL 0.168 0.118 BDL BDL BDL 2 BDL BDL BDL BDL 0.199 0.130 BDL BDL BDL 3 BDL BDL BDL BDL 0.178 0.101 BDL BDL BDL Average BDL BDL BDL BDL 0.182 0.116 BDL BDL BDL 6 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 7 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 10 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 11 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 14 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 15 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 16 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 22 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 23 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 24 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 25 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 4 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 5 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 8 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 9 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 12 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 13 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL SEMATECH and IMEC COLLABORATION 17

Off-gassing during CMP Run 3: Parameters: Slurry B, 150 ml/l, ph8, additive 1.5% H 2 O 2 Run Material Polishing Time[s] 3 oxide 60 3 oxide 60 3 oxide 60 3 oxide 60 3 InP 180 3 InP 180 3 InP 180 3 oxide 60 3 oxide 60 3 InGaAs 120 3 InGaAs 120 3 oxide 60 3 oxide 60 3 GaAs 120 3 GaAs 120 3 oxide 60 3 oxide 60 3 Si 120 3 Si 120 3 Si 120 SEMATECH and IMEC COLLABORATION 18

Off-gassing during CMP Run 3: Parameters: Slurry B, 150 ml/l, ph8, additive 1.5% H 2 O 2 Test results: Wafer Type InP InGaAs GaAs Si Oxide Wafer Number Run 3 FTIR Concentration Summary AsH3 (ppmv) PH3 (ppmv) SiH4 (ppmv) Min Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg 1 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 2 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 3 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 6 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 7 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 10 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 11 BDL 0.015 0.006 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL Average BDL 0.015 0.006 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 14 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 15 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 16 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 4 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 5 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 8 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 9 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 12 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 13 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL SEMATECH and IMEC COLLABORATION 19

Off-gassing during CMP Run 4: Parameters: Slurry C, 150 ml/l, ph10, additive 1.5% H 2 O 2 Run Material Polishing Time[s] 4 oxide 60 4 oxide 60 4 oxide 60 4 oxide 60 4 InP 180 4 InP 180 4 InP 180 4 oxide 60 4 oxide 60 4 InGaAs 120 4 InGaAs 120 4 oxide 60 4 oxide 60 4 GaAs 120 4 GaAs 120 4 oxide 60 4 oxide 60 4 Si 120 4 Si 120 4 Si 120 SEMATECH and IMEC COLLABORATION 20

Off-gassing during CMP Run 4: Parameters: Slurry C, 150 ml/l, ph10, additive 1.5% H 2 O 2 Test results: Wafer Type InP InGaAs GaAs Si Oxide Wafer Number Run 4 FTIR Concentration Summary AsH3 (ppmv) PH3 (ppmv) SiH4 (ppmv) Min Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg 1 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 2 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 3 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 6 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 7 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 10 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 11 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 14 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 15 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 16 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 4 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 5 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 8 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 9 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 12 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 13 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL SEMATECH and IMEC COLLABORATION 21

Max PH3 Generation (PPB) Summary Off-gassing during CMP Significant level of PH 3 (with peaks of 170 300 ppb) was detected during InP wafer polishing with Slurry A (@ph 4). Significant level of AsH 3 was detected during GaAs wafer polishing with Slurry A (24 ppb @ph 4) and Slurry B (15 ppb @ph 8). Hydride evolution depends on slurry ph, slurry type, and the concentration of H 2 O 2. The presence of increased H 2 O 2 concentration tends to reduce the off-gassing rate of III-V hydride gases. Hydride off-gassing during III-V CMP polishing needs ESH attention. 200 100 0 Source: S.V. Babu Clarkson University 2 4 6 8 10 12 ph SEMATECH and IMEC COLLABORATION 22

Industry Exposure Thresholds OSHA PEL (8-hr TWA) ACGIH TLV (8-hr TWA) NIOSH IDLH Arsine (AsH 3 ) 0.05 ppm; 0.2 mg/m 3 0.005 ppm 3 ppm Phosphine (PH 3 ) 0.3 ppm; 0.4 mg/m 3 0.3 ppm 50 ppm SEMATECH and IMEC COLLABORATION 23

Summary Wafer off-gassing of PH 3 from InP layer has been observed inside a sealed FOUP, in contrast to GaAs which did not show AsH 3 off-gassing Off-gassing of PH 3 can continue even 24 to 48 hours after wafer enclosure in FOUP Solutions need to be developed to ensure off-gassing is completed in a shorter time-frame to allow ESH-compatible manufacturing Significant level of PH 3 release was detected during CMP process of InP wafers under low ph conditions. InGaAs wafers did not show AsH 3 gas evolution under conditions where GaAs CMP showed AsH 3 evolution Addition experimental confirmation of AsH 3 gas evolution during GaAs CMP is recommended FTIR has the capability of identifying the species and the concentrations of the hydride gases Quantitative CM4 data was of limited analytical use without prior knowledge of a gas mixture s composition, or a way to differentiate the various gas constituents beforehand SEMATECH and IMEC COLLABORATION 24

THANK YOU 25