Minnesota Deer Population Goals

Similar documents
Minnesota Deer Population Goals

Minnesota Deer Population Goals. East Central Uplands Goal Block

Minnesota Deer Population Goals. Sand Plain Big Woods Goal Block

DMU 006 Arenac County Deer Management Unit

Deer Management Unit 252

2015 Deer Population Goal Setting

Deer Management Unit 152

DMU 056 Midland County Deer Management Unit

Monitoring Population Trends of White-tailed Deer in Minnesota Marrett Grund, Farmland Wildlife Populations and Research Group

Deer Management Unit 122

021 Deer Management Unit

DMU 073 Saginaw County Deer Management Unit

Deer Management Unit 249

Deer Management Unit 349

DMU 024 Emmet County Deer Management Unit

DMU 005 Antrim County Deer Management Unit

Deer Management Unit 255

DMU 065 Ogemaw County Deer Management Unit

Northwest Parkland-Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G7 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

DMU 053 Mason County Deer Management Unit

DMU 057 Missaukee County Deer Management Unit

Deer Management Unit 127

Central Hills Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G9 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

5/DMU 069 Otsego County Deer Management Unit

DMU 361 Fremont Deer Management Unit Newaygo, Oceana, N. Muskegon Counties

2017 DEER HUNTING FORECAST

DMU 043 Lake County Deer Management Unit

DMU 040 Kalkaska County Deer Management Unit

DMU 008 Barry County Deer Management Unit

DMU 045 Leelanau County Deer Management Unit

Introduction to Pennsylvania s Deer Management Program. Christopher S. Rosenberry Deer and Elk Section Bureau of Wildlife Management

ALTERNATIVE DEER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR GAME MANAGEMENT UNITS. 12A, 12B, 13A, 13B, 16A, 45A, 45B, 45C, and White-tailed Deer Units

DMU 452 Northern Multi-County Deer Management Unit

DMU 047 Livingston County Deer Management Unit

DMU 082 Wayne County Deer Management Unit

DMU 046 Lenawee County Deer Management Unit

RANCHING Wildlife. Texas White-Tailed Deer 2017 Hunting Forecast

DMU 487 Northern Multi-County Deer Management Unit

DMU 038 Jackson County

DMU 332 Huron, Sanilac and Tuscola Counties Deer Management Unit

Deer and Deer Management in Central New York: Local Residents Interests and Concerns

Report to the Joint Standing Committee on Inland Fisheries and Wildlife

Full summaries of all proposed rule changes, including DMU boundary descriptions, are included in the additional background material.

DMU 072 Roscommon County Deer Management Unit

San Juan Basin Elk Herd E-31 Data Analysis Unit Plan Game Management Units 75, 751, 77, 771, and 78

SUMMARY REPORT Managed Archery Program Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania. Submitted by Dr. Anthony J. DeNicola White Buffalo Inc.

Deer Harvest Characteristics During Compound and Traditional Archery Hunts

CHECKS AND BALANCES. OVERVIEW Students become managers of a herd of animals in a paper-pencil, discussionbased

Deer Management in Maryland. Brian Eyler Deer Project Leader Maryland DNR

NORTH TABLELANDS DEER HERD MANAGEMENT PLAN

Summary report on all harvested species on Patuxent Research Refuge from September 1 - January 31, 2017 Deer Harvest

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Predator and Furbearer Management. SPECIES: Predatory and Furbearing Mammals

Recommendations for Pennsylvania's Deer Management Program and The 2010 Deer Hunting Season

Life history Food Distribution Management... 98

make people aware of the department s actions for improving the deer population monitoring system,

Enclosed, please find the 2018 Spotlight Deer Survey Report and Recommendations that we have prepared for your review and records.

Ruffed Grouse Conservation Plan Executive Report

FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS BY, WISCONSIN WHITE-TAILED DEER TRUSTEE AND REVIEW COMMITTEE JUNE, 2012

Minnesota Deer Population Goal Setting Team Information Packet Superior Uplands Arrowhead Goal Block 2015

Mule deer in the Boundary Region: Proposed research and discussion

NORTH DAKOTA STATE REPORT June 2016

White-Tailed Deer Management FAQ

1) Increase the deer population to 475,000 (mule, 150,000;

Deer Management in Maryland -Overview. Brian Eyler Deer Project Leader

The Greater Sage-Grouse:

Mitigating Vehicle Collisions with Large Wildlife

Township of Plainsboro Ordinance No County of Middlesex AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A DEER MANAGEMENT PLAN ON CERTAIN PUBLIC PROPERTY

2018 WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT PLAN

2012 North Ottawa Dunes Deer Management Hunt. Rules and Regulations

ARIKAREE DEER HERD MANAGEMENT PLAN

Minnesota White-tailed Deer Management Plan

Michigan Predator-Prey Project Phase 1 Preliminary Results and Management Recommendations. Study Background

Comprehensive Deer Management Program Montgomery County, MD. Rob Gibbs Natural Resources Manager M-NCPPC, Montgomery Dept of Parks

Findings of the Alaska Board of Game BOG

IN PROGRESS BIG GAME HARVEST REPORTS FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH Energy and Resource Development

2012 Minnesota Wolf Season Report

Fall Wild Turkey Population Survey, 2010

NORTH DAKOTA STATE REPORT May 25, 2011

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Feasibility Study on the Reintroduction of Gray Wolves to the Olympic Peninsula

Observations of Wolves and Deer during the 2016 Moose Survey

Kansas Deer Report Seasons

Big Game Season Structure, Background and Context

2007 BIG GAME AND FURBEARER HARVEST RECORD FOR THE FOND DU LAC RESERVATION AND CEDED TERRITORIES

LEAPS BOUNDS. Growing up hunting as a kid in New Hampshire, I didn t. by Dan Bergeron

Monitoring Population Trends of White-tailed Deer in Minnesota

DMU 419 Clinton, Eaton, Ingham, Ionia, and Shiawassee Counties

2009 BIG GAME AND FURBEARER HARVEST RECORD FOR THE FOND DU LAC RESERVATION AND CEDED TERRITORIES

AN ASSESSMENT OF NEW JERSEY DEER HUNTER OPINION ON EXPANDING ANTLER POINT RESTRICTION (APR) REGULATIONS IN DEER MANAGEMENT ZONES 28, 30, 31, 34 AND 47

White-tailed Deer: A Review of the 2010 Provincially Coordinated Hunting Regulation

Hunter and Angler Expenditures, Characteristics, and Economic Effects, North Dakota,

2015 WILDLIFE HARVEST RECORD FOR THE FOND DU LAC BAND OF LAKE SUPERIOR CHIPPEWA

TOWN OF ISLESBORO DEER REDUCTION COMMITTEE REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO CONDUCT A SPECIAL HUNT INTRODUCTION

Saguache Mule Deer Herd Data Analysis Unit D-26 Game Management Units 68, 681 and 682 March 2008

Quality Deer Management and Prescribed Fire Natural Partners in Wildlife and Habitat Conservation

2008 WMU 502 white tailed deer, mule deer, and moose

PRIORITY READING HOPEWELL VALLEY DEER MANAGEMENT PLAN. Hopewell Valley Deer Management Task Force: Abating Deer Impacts at the Community Level

Cariboo-Chilcotin (Region 5) Mule Deer: Frequently Asked Questions

2017 LATE WINTER CLASSIFICATION OF NORTHERN YELLOWSTONE ELK

Observations of Deer and Wolves during the 2017 Moose Survey

Full Spectrum Deer Management Services

Transcription:

This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp Minnesota Deer Population Goals North Central Plains - Moraines Goal Block Minnesota DNR Section of Wildlife, 2015

Final Deer Population Goals Block 2: North Central Plains Moraines The following pages provide a description of the 2015 deer population goals, factors considered during goal setting, and management implications for each permit area in Block 2: North Central Plains Moraines (deer permit areas 169, 172, 184, 197, 210 and 298). Final population goals were developed through a public engagement process, including collecting public comment (via public meetings, online and written questionnaires, mail and email) and convening citizen advisory teams to review information and make recommendations on population goals to DNR. Goals are anticipated to be revisited in 3-5 years (2018-2020). Information incorporated into the final decision includes 1 : Block 2 Hunter and Landowner Survey Reports Block 2 Team Information Packet and Addendum 2014 Harvest Report Public comment received during comment periods in winter and spring 2015 Block 2 Advisory Team Recommendations Input from Area and Regional staff 1 Goal setting materials are linked for convenience; source materials with additional detail are cited on the last page.

Contents Deer Permit Area 169... 4 Deer Permit Area 172... 8 Deer Permit Area 184... 12 Deer Permit Area 197... 16 Deer Permit Area 210... 20 Deer Permit Area 298... 24

Deer Permit Area 169 This permit area is primarily forested, with a large percentage of the land in public ownership. About two thirds of the permit area lies within the Chippewa National Forest. Private land holdings are primarily for recreation. The deer population has been decreasing since the mid-2000s. The severe winters of 2012-13 and 2013-14 significantly contributed to the population decline. 2015 Deer Population Goal: Increase the population 50%, relative to 2014 population, over the next 3-5 years Summary of decision A majority (91%) of hunters surveyed in this permit area preferred a population increase, with the greatest number (40%) preferring an increase of 50%. A majority (75%) of landowners surveyed in this permit area preferred a population increase, with the greatest number (31%) preferring an increase of 50%. Public comment collected via online and written questionnaires in winter 2015 showed that a majority (91%) of questionnaire respondents preferred a population increase, with the greatest number (66%) preferring an increase of 50%. After reviewing biological and social data for this permit area, the deer advisory team recommended a population increase of 50%; factors considered included harvest levels, hunter success rates, wolves, agricultural impacts, available habitat and more. Public comment collected in spring 2015 showed that approximately 80% of commenters supported or were ok with the team s recommendation. The Department decided to manage for an increased deer population in recognition of the advisory team recommendation, broader stakeholder desires, and public support for team recommendations. Management implications This recommendation will result in management for populations above those directed by previous goals. The Department will aim for a target density of 13-17 deer per square mile (dpsm) of land area (pre-fawn) based on the 2014 model estimate of 7-13 dpsm 2. In addition to trends indicated by the population model estimates, trends in harvest indices, WSI, and field observations will be used to assess population status. 2 Note that, similar to a weather forecast or budget forecast, model estimates may change over time as new information is incorporated into the model. For example, DNR deer population modeling occurs each spring prior to setting deer seasons. If the winter persists beyond the date when population estimates are developed, the estimate for that year may be different in the following year once the final data on winter severity can be included. In that case, DNR will assess the trend in the population based on the most up-to-date estimate of the 2014 population and best available data, along with other population indices. Page 4

Even if severe winter conditions do not occur, very conservative management strategies are anticipated for the next few years to move the population toward goal. Page 5

Deer Permit Area: 169 Size of Deer Permit Area: 1212 square miles total; 1124 square miles of land. 2015 Population Goal: Increase the population 50%, relative to 2014 population, over the next 3-5 years. Comments: Deer Permit Area 169 was established in 2010. Reported Deer Harvest (All seasons) Year Mgmt. Designation No. Firearm Firearm Hunters Success (%) Total Bucks Antlerless 2010 Lottery (4500) 9470 30% 2799 1612 1187 2011 Hunter s Choice 8980 30% 2659 1208 1451 2012 Lottery (3000) 9357 26% 2419 1500 919 2013 Lottery (3000) 9415 24% 2236 1345 891 2014 Bucks Only 6806 14% 967 962 5 Page 6

Deer Permit Area: 169 Size of Deer Permit Area: 1212 square miles total; 1124 square miles of land Habitat Categories: 2014 Model Output Page 7

Deer Permit Area 172 This permit area consists of primarily forested public land, containing portions of the Chippewa National forest and various state and county administered lands. The majority of the private land in this permit area is found in the southwest corner. Forests in the area are interspersed with lakes and wetlands. Active timber management on the forest land can, and has, supported high deer densities. Deer are unevenly distributed across this permit area with lower densities in the northern portion of the DPA, likely a combination of differences in winter severity and habitat. 2015 Deer Population Goal: Increase the population 25%, relative to 2014 population, over the next 3-5 years Summary of decision A majority (84%) of hunters surveyed in this permit area preferred a population increase, with the greatest number (32%) preferring an increase of 25%. A majority (63%) of landowners surveyed in this permit area preferred a population increase, with the greatest number (25%) preferring an increase of 10%. Public comment collected via online and written questionnaires in winter 2015 showed that a majority (88%) of questionnaire respondents preferred a population increase, with the greatest number (61%) preferring an increase of 50%. After reviewing biological and social data for this permit area, the deer advisory team recommended increasing the population 50%; factors considered included hunter satisfaction and success rates, agricultural impacts, public health and safety (e.g., Lyme disease and deer-vehicle collisions), impacts to landscaping, and more. Public comment collected in spring 2015 showed that approximately 84% of commenters supported or were ok with the team s recommendation. The Department decided to manage for an increased deer population in recognition of the advisory team recommendation, stakeholder desires, and public support for team recommendations. A goal for a more moderate population increase in the deer population reflects a balance between the stakeholder desires for more deer, recognition that most stakeholders desire more moderate increases, and concerns that management to achieve significantly higher densities (> 20 deer per square mile) would result in lower harvest opportunity in the short- and long-term given the habitat mix and hunting pressure in this part of the state as well as concerns about anticipated browsing impacts. Management implications This recommendation will result in management for populations above those directed by previous goals. Page 8

The Department will aim for a target density of 18-22 deer per square mile (dpsm) of land area (pre-fawn) based on the 2014 model estimate of 14-18 dpsm 3. In addition to trends indicated by the population model estimates, trends in harvest indices, WSI, and field observations will be used to assess population status. If milder winter conditions continue, conservative-to-moderate management strategies are anticipated for the next few years to move the population toward goal in this fairly productive area. Browse-related impacts on forest vegetation and wildlife habitat are anticipated with this significant population increase. 3 Note that, similar to a weather forecast or budget forecast, model estimates may change over time as new information is incorporated into the model. For example, DNR deer population modeling occurs each spring prior to setting deer seasons. If the winter persists beyond the date when population estimates are developed, the estimate for that year may be different in the following year once the final data on winter severity can be included. In that case, DNR will assess the trend in the population based on the most up-to-date estimate of the 2014 population and best available data, along with other population indices. Page 9

Deer Permit Area: 172 Size of Deer Permit Area: 780 square miles total; 687 square miles of land. 2015 Population Goal: Increase the population 25%, relative to 2014 population, over the next 3-5 years. Comments: Deer Permit Area (DPA) 172 underwent a boundary change in 2010. Previously the eastern boundary followed State Hwy. 6 north to junction with State Hwy. 200, and then followed State Hwy. 200 west to the unchanged western boundary of the DPA along State Hwy. 371. Reported Deer Harvest (All seasons) Year Mgmt. Designation No. Firearm Firearm Hunters Success (%) Total Bucks Antlerless 2005 Managed 10536 50% 5227 1853 3374 2006 Managed 9357 57% 5359 1803 3556 2007 Managed 9177 53% 4877 1866 3011 2008 Managed 9092 44% 3973 1432 2541 2009 Managed 9072 38% 3459 1203 2256 2010* Lottery (2000) 10444 25% 2640 1737 903 2011 Hunter s Choice 10318 36% 3725 1743 1982 2012 Lottery (2000) 10679 28% 3001 1976 1025 2013 Lottery (2000) 10732 23% 2515 1543 972 2014 Lottery (500) 10373 20% 2117 1499 618 * Boundary change. Please see comments above. Page 10

Deer Permit Area: 172 Size of Deer Permit Area: 780 square miles total; 687 square miles of land Habitat Categories: 2014 Model Output: Page 11

Deer Permit Area 184 The permit area is primarily forested, with a mixture of hardwoods and pine. There are scattered parcels of agriculture throughout the permit area, with the most agriculture in the western portion. The city of Bemidji is within the permit area, as are the Schoolcraft and Bemidji Game Refuges, which provide primarily archers with trophy deer hunting opportunities. There is also an annual archery hunt within the Bemidji City limits. 2015 Deer Population Goal: Increase the population 50%, relative to 2014 population, over the next 3-5 years Summary of decision A majority (80%) of hunters surveyed in this permit area preferred a population increase, with the greatest number (35%) preferring an increase of 25%. A majority (65%) of landowners surveyed in this permit area preferred a population increase, with the greatest number (31%) preferring an increase of 25%. Public comment collected via online and written questionnaires in winter 2015 showed a majority (87%) of questionnaire respondents preferred a population increase, with the greatest number (62%) preferring an increase of 50%. After reviewing biological and social data for this permit area, the deer advisory team recommended a population increase of 50%; factors considered included harvest levels, predation, public health (e.g., Lyme disease), public safety (i.e. deer vehicle collisions) and more. Public comment collected in spring 2015 showed that approximately 84% of commenters supported or were ok with the team s recommendation. The Department decided to manage for an increased deer population in recognition of the advisory team recommendation, broader stakeholder desires, and public support for team recommendations. Management implications This recommendation will result in management for populations above those directed by previous goals. The Department will aim for a target density of 18-24 deer per square mile (dpsm) of land area (pre-fawn) based on the 2014 model estimate of 13-16 dpsm 4. In addition to trends indicated by the population model estimates, trends in harvest indices, WSI, and field observations will be used to assess population status. 4 Note that, similar to a weather forecast or budget forecast, model estimates may change over time as new information is incorporated into the model. For example, DNR deer population modeling occurs each spring prior to setting deer seasons. If the winter persists beyond the date when population estimates are Page 12

If milder winter conditions continue, conservative-to-moderate management strategies are anticipated for the next few years to move the population toward goal in this area. developed, the estimate for that year may be different in the following year once the final data on winter severity can be included. In that case, DNR will assess the trend in the population based on the most up-to-date estimate of the 2014 population and best available data, along with other population indices. Page 13

Deer Permit Area: 184 Size of Deer Permit Area: 1318 square miles total; 1229 square miles of land. 2015 Population Goal: Increase the population 50%, relative to 2014 population, over the next 3-5 years. Reported Deer Harvest (All seasons) Year Mgmt. Designation No. Firearm Firearm Hunters Success (%) Total Bucks Antlerless 2005 Intensive 15724 71% 11228 4097 7131 2006 Intensive 13738 75% 10260 3554 6706 2007 Intensive 13895 79% 10999 3553 7446 2008 Intensive 13742 68% 9311 3416 5895 2009 Managed 13449 49% 6651 2853 3798 2010 Lottery (3750) 13087 33% 4325 3012 1313 2011 Hunter s Choice 13776 37% 5061 2553 2508 2012 Lottery (5500) 14244 34% 4798 3018 1780 2013 Lottery (5500) 14312 29% 4210 2707 1503 2014 Lottery (3000) 14087 26% 3692 2376 1316 Page 14

Deer Permit Area: 184 Size of Deer Permit Area: 1318 square miles total; 1229 square miles of land Habitat Categories: 2014 Model Output: Page 15

Deer Permit Area 197 This permit area aligns with the boundary of the Leech Lake Reservation. The Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe administers its own deer hunt. The land is primarily forested, with a large percentage in public ownership, and lies almost entirely within the Chippewa National Forest. The deer population has been decreasing since the mid-2000s. Recent severe winters have had a varied effect on deer survival, with winter having the greatest impact in the northeastern portion of the DPA and the least in the Southwestern portion of the area. 2015 Deer Population Goal: Increase the population 50%, relative to 2014 population, over the next 3-5 years Summary of decision A majority (83%) of hunters surveyed in this permit area preferred a population increase, with the greatest number (33%) preferring an increase of 25%. A majority (73%) of landowners surveyed in this permit area preferred a population increase, with the greatest number (29%) preferring an increase of 25%. Public comment collected via online and written questionnaires in winter 2015 showed a majority (87%) of questionnaire respondents preferred a population increase, with the greatest number (62%) preferring an increase of 50%. After reviewing biological and social data for this permit area, the deer advisory team recommended a population increase of 50%; factors considered included hunter success rates, harvest levels, agricultural impacts, over-browsing, public health (e.g., Lyme disease), public safety (i.e. deer vehicle collisions) and more. Public comment collected in spring 2015 showed that approximately 83% of commenters supported or were ok with the team s recommendation. The Department decided to manage for an increased deer population in recognition of the advisory team recommendation, broader stakeholder desires, and public support for team recommendations. Management implications This recommendation will result in management for populations above those directed by previous goals. The Department will aim for a target density of 9-12 5 deer per square mile (dpsm) of land area (pre-fawn) based on the 2014 model estimate of 6-9 dpsm 6. In addition to trends indicated by the population model estimates, trends in harvest indices, WSI, and field observations will be used to assess population status. 5 Harvest numbers are only available for state hunter harvest and do not include tribal harvest. As a result any population estimates are minimum estimates as are the associated target densities. Page 16

If milder winter conditions continue, conservative-to-moderate management strategies are anticipated for the next few years to move the population toward goal in this area. 6 Note that, similar to a weather forecast or budget forecast, model estimates may change over time as new information is incorporated into the model. For example, DNR deer population modeling occurs each spring prior to setting deer seasons. If the winter persists beyond the date when population estimates are developed, the estimate for that year may be different in the following year once the final data on winter severity can be included. In that case, DNR will assess the trend in the population based on the most up-to-date estimate of the 2014 population and best available data, along with other population indices. Page 17

Deer Permit Area: 197 Size of Deer Permit Area: 1340 square miles total; 955 square miles of land. 2015 Population Goal: Increase the population 50%, relative to 2014 population, over the next 3-5 years. Comments: Deer Permit Area (DPA) 197 underwent a boundary change in 2010. Previously, the boundary followed the north shore of Leech Lake west, to the most northern point of Leech Lake, then ran due south, along the Battleground State Forest boundary line. Note that harvest numbers only reflect state hunter harvest and do not include tribal harvest. As a result any population estimates are minimum estimates. Reported Deer Harvest (All seasons) Year Mgmt. Designation No. Firearm Firearm Hunters Success (%) Total Bucks Antlerless 2005 Lottery (1800) 4648 34% 1594 999 595 2006 Managed 4663 53% 2471 1090 1381 2007 Managed 4630 49% 2248 1108 1140 2008 Managed 4796 43% 2055 1002 1053 2009 Managed 5097 36% 1859 883 976 2010* Lottery (2500) 5388 32% 1700 1056 644 2011 Hunter s Choice 5750 32% 1831 994 837 2012 Lottery (1500) 5824 26% 1543 1029 514 2013 Lottery (1500) 5717 24% 1373 934 439 2014 Lottery (200) 5595 17% 943 758 185 * Boundary change. Please see comments above. Page 18

Deer Permit Area: 197 Size of Deer Permit Area: 1340 square miles total; 955 square miles of land Habitat Categories: 2014 Model Output: Page 19

Deer Permit Area 210 Much of the western portion of DPA 210 is composed of habitats indicative of the Transition Zone (prairie/agriculture) which grades into deciduous (primarily quaking aspen) woodlands and then into a mosaic of hardwoods, evergreens and lowland brush as one moves to the east end of the permit area. The tremendous diversity of upland habitats makes 210 a permit area in which deer reproduction is capable of gaining strong numbers over a few years in response to such influences as difficult winter weather or high hunter success. There are many tracts of land in 210 that are owned by those who enjoy the natural aspects of their land for wildlife viewing and deer hunting. Often, these private tracts are managed to improve habitat to favor robust deer populations. This permit area also sees substantial commercial aspen cutting and subsequent regeneration; almost always a positive for early successional species like white-tailed deer. In the Crookston work area, DPA 210 is the most difficult unit to aerially survey for deer due to the dense canopy in parts of the permit area. 2015 Deer Population Goal: Increase the population 50%, relative to 2014 population, over the next 3-5 years Summary of decision A majority (80%) of hunters surveyed in this permit area preferred a population increase, with the greatest number (42%) preferring an increase of 25%. A majority (65%) of landowners surveyed in this permit area preferred a population increase, with the greatest number (28%) preferring an increase of 10%. Public comment collected via online and written questionnaires in winter 2015 showed that a majority (87%) of questionnaire respondents preferred a population increase, with the greatest number (57%) preferring an increase of 50%. After reviewing biological and social data for this permit area, the deer advisory team recommended a population increase of 50%. Factors considered in the team s discussion included harvest levels, agricultural impacts, winter weather, public safety (i.e. deer vehicle collisions) and more. Public comment collected in spring 2015 showed that approximately 87% of commenters supported or were ok with the team s recommendation. The Department decided to manage for an increased deer population in recognition of the advisory team recommendation, broader stakeholder desires, and public support for team recommendations. Management implications This recommendation will result in management for populations similar to those directed by previous goals. Page 20

The Department will aim for a target density of 8-10 deer per square mile (dpsm) of land area (pre-fawn) based on the 2014 model estimate of 5-7 dpsm 7. In addition to trends indicated by the population model estimates, trends in harvest indices, WSI, and field observations will be used to assess population status. If milder winter conditions continue, conservative-to-moderate management strategies are anticipated for the next few years to move the population toward goal in this fairly productive area. 7 Note that, similar to a weather forecast or budget forecast, model estimates may change over time as new information is incorporated into the model. For example, DNR deer population modeling occurs each spring prior to setting deer seasons. If the winter persists beyond the date when population estimates are developed, the estimate for that year may be different in the following year once the final data on winter severity can be included. In that case, DNR will assess the trend in the population based on the most up-to-date estimate of the 2014 population and best available data, along with other population indices. Page 21

Deer Permit Area: 210 Size of Deer Permit Area: 636 square miles total; 615 square miles of land. 2015 Population Goal: Increase the population 50%, relative to 2014 population, over the next 3-5 years. Reported Deer Harvest (All seasons) Year Mgmt. Designation No. Firearm Firearm Hunters Success (%) Total Bucks Antlerless 2005 Intensive 4450 67% 2968 1176 1792 2006 Intensive 4041 77% 3122 1140 1982 2007 Intensive 4125 74% 3041 1084 1957 2008 Intensive 4340 67% 2910 1132 1778 2009 Intensive 4321 65% 2798 1105 1693 2010 Intensive 4265 61% 2604 1077 1527 2011 Intensive 4592 50% 2274 770 1504 2012 Managed 4578 50% 2307 996 1311 2013 Managed 4558 36% 1619 773 846 2014 Hunter s Choice 4486 29% 1290 712 578 Page 22

Deer Permit Area: 210 Size of Deer Permit Area: 636 square miles total; 615 square miles of land Habitat Categories: 2014 Model Output: Page 23

Deer Permit Area 298 This permit area is entirely within the White Earth Reservation and contains a significant amount of county, state, and tribal land. The area contains good deer habitat comprised of primarily forest with some agricultural areas interspersed with numerous lakes and wetlands. The deer population has trended downward to a stable level over the past decade, likely due to deer harvest levels and more severe winter weather. A few concerns about deer browsing tree seedlings have been noted over the years. 2015 Deer Population Goal: Increase the population 50%, relative to 2014 population, over the next 3-5 years Summary of decision A majority (87%) of hunters surveyed in this permit area preferred a population increase, with the greatest number (38%) preferring an increase of 50%. A majority (76%) of landowners surveyed in this permit area preferred a population increase, with the greatest number (40%) preferring an increase of 25%. Public comment collected via online and written questionnaires in winter 2015 showed that a majority (85%) of questionnaire respondents preferred a population increase, with the greatest number (54%) preferring an increase of 50%. After reviewing biological and social data for this permit area, the deer advisory team recommended a population increase of 50%. Factors considered in the team s discussion included hunter success rates, harvest levels, impact to population centers and more. Public comment collected in spring 2015 showed that approximately 85% of commenters supported or were ok with the team s recommendation. The Department decided to manage for an increased deer population in recognition of the advisory team recommendation, broader stakeholder desires, and public support for team recommendations. Management implications This recommendation will result in management for populations similar to those directed by previous goals. The Department will aim for a target density of 13-17 8 deer per square mile (dpsm) of land area (pre-fawn) based on the 2014 model estimate of 8-11 dpsm 9. In addition to trends indicated by the population model estimates, trends in harvest indices, WSI, and field observations will be be used to assess population status. 8 Note that harvest numbers are only available for state hunter harvest and do not include tribal harvest. As a result any population estimates are minimum estimates, as are the associated target densities. Page 24

Even if milder winter conditions continue, conservative management strategies are anticipated for the next few years to move the population toward goal in this area. 9 Note that, similar to a weather forecast or budget forecast, model estimates may change over time as new information is incorporated into the model. For example, DNR deer population modeling occurs each spring prior to setting deer seasons. If the winter persists beyond the date when population estimates are developed, the estimate for that year may be different in the following year once the final data on winter severity can be included. In that case, DNR will assess the trend in the population based on the most up-to-date estimate of the 2014 population and best available data, along with other population indices. Page 25

Deer Permit Area: 298 Size of Deer Permit Area: 677 square miles total; 618 square miles of land. 2015 Population Goal: Increase the population 50%, relative to 2014 population, over the next 3-5 years. Comments: Note that harvest numbers only reflect state hunter harvest and do not include tribal harvest. As a result any population estimates are minimum estimates. Reported Deer Harvest (All seasons) Year Mgmt. Designation No. Firearm Firearm Hunters Success (%) Total Bucks Antlerless 2005 Managed 3621 46% 1664 810 854 2006 Managed 3201 54% 1727 799 928 2007 Managed 3236 50% 1610 753 857 2008 Managed 3143 45% 1420 712 708 2009 Managed 3794 42% 1585 699 886 2010 Managed 3768 43% 1612 722 890 2011 Hunter s Choice 3776 27% 1022 529 493 2012 Lottery (600) 3769 26% 962 734 228 2013 Lottery (600) 3618 21% 749 578 171 2014 Lottery (100) 3351 18% 598 484 114 Page 26

Deer Permit Area: 298 Size of Deer Permit Area: 677 square miles total; 618 square miles of land Habitat Categories: 2014 Model Output: Page 27

References MNDNR. 2014. 2014 Minnesota Deer Harvest Report. St. Paul, Minnesota. 44pp. MNDNR. 2015. Minnesota Deer Population Goal Setting Packet: Superior Uplands Arrowhead Goal Block 2015. St. Paul, Minnesota. 66pp. with addendum. MNDNR. 2015. Superior Uplands Arrowhead :Deer Goal Setting Block 1 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results. St. Paul, Minnesota. 32pp. Page 28