Deep SOLO. Nathalie Zilberman, Dean Roemmich, and SIO float lab. 1. Deep SOLO float characteristics. 2. Deep SOLO float Deployment

Similar documents
Development of the Deep Argo Program

WEBB RESEARCH CORPORATION

SBE61 CTD calibration: results from the June 2014 Tangaroa Voyage

Deep-Arvor: a CTD & DO profiling float for Argo

1.1 Argo cycle timing variables for the trajectory file

PERSPECTIVES FOR ACCURACY AND QUALITY ASSURANCE OF CTD & BIOGEOCHEMICAL DATA STREAMS FROM AUTONOMOUS PLATFORMS

Floats in Polar Oceans. Olaf Boebel and Eberhard Fahrbach, AWI-Bremerhaven, Germany

MAPCO2 Buoy Metadata Report Project Title:

PROVOR/ ARVOR ARGO profiling floats

2017 Float and Sensor Workshop. Conveners: Brian King, Steve Riser, Susan Wijffels Local Host: Steve Riser, U. Washington

RR10106 Cruise Plan ITOP Mooring Recovery and PhilSea10 Seaglider Operation (R/V Revelle November 6-26, 2010)

QC for Hydrographic Data GEOSECS to GO-SHIP. Susan M. Becker Scripps Institution of Oceanography Oceanographic Data Facility

CORIOLIS, A FRENCH PROJECT FOR IN SITU OPERATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHY. S. Pouliquen, A. Billant, Y. Desaubies, G. Loaec, F. Gaillard, G.

Oxygen measurements: sensors accuracy and scientific needs

Argo Float Pressure Offset Adjustment Recommendations. 1: IORGC/JAMSTEC, 2-15, Natsushima-cho, Yokosuka, , Japan

Stability of Temperature and Conductivity Sensors of Argo Profiling Floats

E-AIMS. R&D on float technology Synthesis D2.6.1

Accuracy and Stability of Sea-Bird s Argo CTD and Work Towards a Better CTD for Deep Argo. David Murphy Sea-Bird Electronics

Glossary Published on LEARNZ (

Sensor Stability. Summarized by Breck Owens David Murphy, Sea-Bird Electronics AST-14 Wellington March 18-21

Glider and shipboard observations for underwater optical detection and communications

WHOTS Mooring Subsurface Instrumentation

Cruise Plan for QPE (R/V Revelle Sept/ 12-16, 2009)

Draft of OKMC Cruise Plan (R/V Revelle June 1-14, 2012 RR1205)

BEFORE YOU OPEN ANY FILES:

Mooring Modifications for the Reduction of Losses to Vandalism

PROVOR line. Technical update

ANDRO: An Argo-based deep displacement atlas

Cascading of Dense Water along the Peter the Great Bay Slope in the northwestern Japan Sea

Figure 8: Buoyancy Force and Weight Acting on an Object

7.4 Temperature, Salinity and Currents in Jamaica Bay

Location: Barkley Canyon Date: September 9, 2013 Constraints: none

EP A1 (19) (11) EP A1. (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION published in accordance with Art. 153(4) EPC

DIVE PLAN Leg 1 Dive 11 Recover Wally 1

Vertical in situ profiles of nitrate and oxygen in the northern Japan Sea

Temperature, salinity, density, and the oceanic pressure field

BEFORE YOU OPEN ANY FILES:

The Evolution of Vertical Spatial Coherence with Range from Source

Yasuhisa ISHIHARA Marine Technology Center JAMSTEC

The 2008 North Atlantic Bloom Experiment. Calibration Report #3

Columbia River Plume 2006 OSU Ocean Mixing Nash, Kilcher, Moum et al. CR05 Cruise Report (RISE Pt. Sur, May )

"Real-Time Vertical Temperature, and Velocity Profiles from a Wave Glider"

DIVING PHYSICS EXAMPLE QUESTIONS

Archimer

WildCat RF unit (0.5W), full 32-byte transmissions with built-in checksum

Review: Fluids. container into which it has been poured. changes gases are compressible. pressure changes

Overview. 2 Module 13: Advanced Data Processing

Ocean Observatories Initiative (OOI) Moorings: New Capabilities for Seagoing Science

ANDRO: An Argo-based deep displacement atlas

Upper-ocean stratification from drifters for SMOS/Aquarius cal-val

Slide 1 / What is the density of an aluminum block with a mass of 4050 kg and volume of 1.5 m 3?

Country report - India NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF OCEAN TECHNOLOGY 07/10/2010

Oceanographic Research With The LiquID Station

Variability in the tropical oceans - Monitoring and prediction of El Niño and La Niña -

APEX PROFILER USER MANUAL

Fluids always move from high pressure to low pressure. Air molecules pulled by gravity = atmospheric pressure

How well do CMIP5 climate models reproduce Southern Ocean bottom temperature? Model climatology

PRELIMINARY CRUISE REPORT, W9909C R/V WECOMA, September 1999 GLOBEC/ENSO Long-Term Observations off Oregon

U S F O S B u o y a n c y And Hydrodynamic M a s s

Tools of Oceanography Ocean Currents. Drift Bottles and Dyes: measures speed and direction of ocean currents.

Observational approaches to oxygen depletion

PRESSURE AND BUOYANCY

South Bay Coastal Ocean Observing System California Clean Beaches Initiative

Drift Characteristics of Paroscientific pressure sensors

Sensors and Platforms for Autonomous Undersea Systems

Procedures for correcting in situ CTD data and results obtained during the NEAR-GOOS Cross-Basin Climate Monitoring Section project

Steller sea lion tracking using satellite telemetry in the western/central Aleutian Islands

INTRODUCTION MOORING DESIGN

Fine-Scale Survey of Right and Humpback Whale Prey Abundance and Distribution

Systematic Validation of Conductivity and Temperature from Ocean moored buoy data in the northern Indian Ocean with in situ ship based measurements

Table 1. Sequence of bubble and dredging tests with prevailing tide stage and number of bucket cycles recorded for each test.

Build a Boat for Scientific Research

PHYS:1200 LECTURE 13 FLUIDS (2)

Buoyancy and Density. Buoyant Force and Fluid Pressure. Key Concept Buoyant force and density affect whether an object will float or sink in a fluid.

ATON System Workshop

Alvin Debrief Summary Seven Cruises for 91 dives. Southern California Juan de Fuca Costa Rica Guaymas Basin Galapagos

Application for Consent to Conduct Marine Scientific Research. F Internal Waves in Straits (IWISE) Institution Contact Information Director

RVSS Appendix A Overview

Mechanisms of Fast Changes in Physical and Biological Fields along Primorye Coast in the Japan Sea

The Next Generation Easy-to-Deploy (ETD) Tsunami Assessment Buoy

Surf Zone Mapping and Sensor System

Chapter 9. Forces and Fluids

Boy, Oh Buoyancy. Does it Float? Does it Sink?

Invitational Sail Cruise Report Cruise C-268A

A Wind Profiling Platform for Offshore Wind Measurements and Assessment. Presenter: Mark Blaseckie AXYS Technologies Inc.

3 Solutions Found for Irish Research Vessels. A CTD Davit design

CMORE HOE DYLAN October 2012 Draft cruise plan

NT09-21 Cruise Report SURUGA-BAY Cable Laying Experiment / VBCS Function Test

A Next Generation Self- Locating Datum Marker Buoy

Irrigation &Hydraulics Department lb / ft to kg/lit.

The Global Drifter Program Observations of Sea Surface Temperature in the World s Ocean

TNA PROJECT PRELIMINARY REPORT 1 st Call of Proposals 12 January 3 April, 2012

SIO 210 Introduction to Physical Oceanography Mid-term examination October 31, 2011; 50 minutes

An Atlas of Oceanic Internal Solitary Waves (February 2004) by Global Ocean Associates Prepared for Office of Naval Research Code 322 PO

NSF's Ocean Observatories Initiative: Building Research Infrastructure for the Pacific Northwest and the Broader Community

GLIDERS Aanderaa oxygen optode (models 3830 & 3835)

Call for Ideas for Balloon Experiments within the HEMERA project

Kathleen Dohan. Wind-Driven Surface Currents. Earth and Space Research, Seattle, WA

Argo National Data Management Report Italy (2016)

(Sea)glider data processing the. sampling and thermal lag

Transcription:

Deep SOLO Nathalie Zilberman, Dean Roemmich, and SIO float lab 1. Deep SOLO float characteristics 2. Deep SOLO float Deployment 3. Deep SOLO temperature and salinity Deep SOLO Float deployment, R/V Tangaroa June 2014, south-west Pacific 4. Summary

Deep SOLO Float characteristics 6000 m depth # of dive cycles: 160 (6.5-day cycle for the prototypes at present) Telemetry: Iridium Surface time: 30 minutes Mass: 25 kg (SOLO 2 weighs 18.6 kg ) Housing: 13-inch glass ball Hydraulic pump runs at 50 m (sets float target depth), at max depth, and during ascent to maintain vertical speed. 2-meter wire rope used to feel the ocean bottom without snagging on the bottom or entraining mud. Wire length and density chosen for damping and keeping the float from hitting the bottom. Float will not hit bottom unless ocean bottom depth is less than 600 m from target depth.

Deep SOLO Float characteristics New CTD from Seabird = SBE61 Continuous profile to 500 m, at 2 dbar averaging bins, and then switch to discretemode: 5 dbar to 1000 m, 10 dbar to 2000 m, 20 dbar to 3000 m, 50 dbar to 6000 m (adjustable). Energy/cycle is 24 kj to 5500 m Buoyancy is 89%, communication is 1%, and CTD is 10%. (SOLO 2 needs less than 10 kj/cycle to 2000 m) Speed of ascent & descent is ~ 6 cm/s (SOLO 2 speed is 12 cm/s) The floats to deploy in Aug-Oct 2015 have 3-m chain. Float will not hit bottom unless ocean bottom depth is less than 900 m from target depth. New batch will also have a new controller with the option to measure TS on the way up or down.

Deep SOLO prototype cycle Phase 1 = 32 hours, no parking 30-min at surface to transmit data to satellite Phase 2 = 32 hours + 1-2 day (now 4-5 day) parking 30-min at surface to transmit data to satellite Salinity & Temperature profile recorded on the way down. Descending speed decreases with depth from 20 cm/s at the sea surface to 5 cm/s at max depth. Descending time is 12 hours. Ascent to 2000 m at 6 cm/s increasing to 12 cm/s at the sea surface. Ascending time is 20 hours) Float descends to 5500 m or ocean bottom depth if shallower than target depth Float becomes neutrally buoyant when 2-meter wire rope touches ocean bottom Drift at 5300 m for 1-2 days (now 4-5 days)

Region of choice: south-west Pacific region Region of deep ocean warming: Southern Ocean; avoid high variability regions (eddies) (IPCC 2013, data from Purkey and Johnson, 2010) Away from the deep WBC on the eastern side of the Tonga Kermadec Ridge SOSE 2005-2010 mean (Matt Mazloff and Jinbo Wang) Tonga Kermadec Ridge Deployment region Deep (5500-5580 m depth) and relatively flat area Ship time was contributed by NIWA, June 16-25th 2014, with contribution from Australian Argo and US Argo Depth contours are -3000, -3500, and -5000 m

Deep SOLO prototypes 6003 and 6002 positions 6002 6003 Deployment position Current position CTD station Depth contours are -3000 m, -3500 m, and -5000 m. 6002 6003 Depth contours are -4500 m, -5000 m, -5500 m and -5800 m.

Comparison of Deep SOLO 6003 and shipboard CTD data 4000 dbar - 5000 dbar SBE 6003 CTD salinity is 0.005-0.006 saltier than shipboard CTD at pressure > 2000 dbar.

Comparison of Deep SOLO 6003 and 6002 and shipboard CTD data 2000 dbar - 3000 dbar 4000 dbar SBE 6002 CTD salinity shows a 0.03-0.05 fresh bias compared with shipboard CTD at pressure > 2000 dbar.

Bottom depth 6002 Max depth from 6002 in good agreement with Smith and Sandwell (1 minute x 1 minute grid) bathymetry [Sandwell et al., 2014] after cycle 31. Deep SOLO 6002 path Deployment Current position

Bottom depth 6003 6003 parked at the bottom at cycles 12, 29-31, and 53-56. Max pressure > 600 m shallower than target pressure. Max depth from 6003 in good agreement with Smith and Sandwell bathymetry after cycle 28. Deep SOLO 6003 path Deployment Current position

30 sec x 30 sec gridded bathymetry SRTM30 [Sandwell et al, 2014]

Time-variability in temperature and salinity below 2000 m Variability in temperature and salinity due to vertical displacement of isotherms and isohalines. 6002 CTD shows similar temperature and salinity changes.

Stability of 6002 and 6003 CTDs 6002 and 6003 CTDs are stable after 8 cycles. Salinity variability of 6002 and 6003 are mostly within ± 0.001, target accuracy of the instrument. Salinity variability at 1.2-1.8 C due to changes in water mass characteristics.

Deep SOLO float deployment August-October 2015 Tentative plan Aug-Oct 2015 (NOAA) Recover 2 deep SOLO float prototypes deployed in June 2014. Deploy 10 deep SOLO (SIO) and Apex (UW) floats. New deep floats New controller An option to profile on the way up Higher precision in T and S through packing algorithm All other parameters (cycle time, parking depth, vertical resolution) are adjustable Scientific objectives Deep water mass characteristics Deep water mass pathways in the southwestern Pacific Ocean

Summary 2 prototype Deep SOLO floats with SBE61 CTDs were deployed at 36 S 177 W, and are presently cycling to 5500 dbar every 6.5 days (> 67 cycles completed by each float over 9 months since deployment). 1 Deep SOLO (6003) CTD has a small salinity bias, ~.005 relative to shipboard data, and the other (6002) has a larger bias of - 0.04 (T and p appear ok). Bottom landing device efficient for avoiding snagging on the bottom or entraining mud. Deep SOLO CTDs are stable after 8 cycles. Both Deep SOLOs may be recovered in August-October 2015 after ~120 cycles (~80% of expected battery capacity), and replaced by a pilot array of 10 Deep Argo floats (Deep SOLOs and Deep APEXs) spread around the south-west Pacific Basin. Cruise photos and video available from www.learnz.org.nz