Making Strides Toward A More Walkable North Park

Similar documents
Vision: Traditional hamlet with an attractive business/pedestrian friendly main street connected to adjacent walkable neighborhoods

Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

Item to be Addressed Checklist Consideration YES NO N/A Required Description Complete Streets Guidelines

FOCUS AREA 1 - Alberta Avenue Pocket Park 3 (121 Ave and 92 St)

5 Circulation & Parking

10/30/2012 VIA

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

City of Vallejo Traffic Calming Toolbox

Tonight is for you. Learn everything you can. Share all your ideas.

City of Seattle Edward B. Murray, Mayor

Agenda. Overview PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary

12/4/2016 VIA . RE: Grocery Outlet Del Paso (DR16-328)

FONTAINE AVENUE STUDY Final Report

o n - m o t o r i z e d transportation is an overlooked element that can greatly enhance the overall quality of life for the community s residents.

BETHEL ROAD AND SEDGWICK ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY

Memo. Introduction. Memphis STP Pedestrian Sidewalk Project

8/31/2016 VIA . RE: Freeport Arco Fuel Station (P16-039)

NJDOT Complete Streets Checklist

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

Report on Walkability Survey and Workshop for ZIP Code Hosted by the Oklahoma City-County Health Department April 13, 2013

11/3/2014 VIA . WALKSacramento has reviewed the Stockton and T Mixed-Use project at 3675 T Street in the

7/23/2017 VIA . Michael Hanebutt City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Boulevard, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

ROUTE 81 CORRIDOR STUDY DESIGN CONCEPTS

Franklin Parking Analysis

Chapter 4 TOOLBOX AND SAMPLE BIKE BOULEVARD LAYOUT

UPTOWN REGIONAL BIKE CORRIDORS PROJECT SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS

9/22/2014 VIA . RE: Butano Apartments Pre App (PAMP )

CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES

Mission-Geneva Transportation Study Community Workshop 2 July 8, 2006

Complete Streets. Designing Streets for Everyone. Sarnia

5/7/2013 VIA . RE: University Village Safeway Expansion (P13-019)

5 CIRCULATION AND STREET DESIGN

Board-Approved Funding Awards for Cycle 4 Active Transportation Grant Program Projects (in Order of Project Rankings) Approved on

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

Table #6 VISION CHARACTERISTICS

CONNECTIVITY PLAN. Adopted December 5, 2017 City of Virginia Beach

Illustrated Principles of Good Planning

6/14/2013 VIA . Evan Compton, Associate Planner Community Development Department City of Sacramento 300 Richards Blvd Sacramento, CA 95814

A CHANGING CITY. of Edmonton, it is essential that it reflects the long-term vision of the City.

Solana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS)

Appendix C. TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM TOOLBOX

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

5/31/2016 VIA . Arwen Wacht City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Blvd., 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

COWETA HIGH SCHOOL AND EAST HIGHWAY 51

PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Aurora Urban Street Standards For Transit Oriented Developments and Urban Centers

COMPLETE STREETS PLANNER S PORTFOLIO

1 st and 2 nd Street Couplet FAQ s

Chapter 3: Multi-Modal Circulation and Streetscapes

5. Pedestrian System. Accomplishments Over the Past Five Years

Citywide Sidewalk and Crosswalk Programs

Bicycle Boulevards and Neighborhood Greenways

25th Avenue Road Diet Project A One Year Evaluation. Transportation Fund for Clean Air Project #05R07

Morristown, NJ Complete Streets Policy

Ocean Park Boulevard Green Street Project Alternatives & Trade Offs

WELCOME. Thank you for joining us at the Second Public Workshop for the Carlsbad Pedestrian Master Plan. We look forward to receiving your feedback.

Safe Routes to School Action Plan Aberdeen, Idaho

complete streets design and construction standards public primer City of Edmonton

Streets. Safe for Pedestrians 20% 2nd 5,000. Are We People-Friendly?

The Leadville Bikeway Design Recommendations DRAFT January 2018

Omaha s Complete Streets Policy

Caltrans Sloat Boulevard Pedestrian Safety Project Response to Community Questions, Comments & Concerns

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

Figure 4-10: Pedestrian Improvements Types of Potential Station Area Improvements - Place-Making Improvements

Central Avenue Bikeway Traffic and Safety Impact Assessment

Living Streets Policy

Transforming the. Michigan Avenue Corridor. a complete streets and transit-oriented development study Michigan State University Student Research Team

City of Elizabeth City Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines

HARRISON STREET/OAKLAND AVENUE COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION PLAN

East Burke Transportation, Safety and Capacity Improvements

The DC Pedestrian Master Plan

CURB EXTENSIONS BULB OUTS DPS 201 NECKDOWNS

C/CAG. Sunnybrae Elementary School Walking and Bicycling Audit. San Mateo-Foster City School District JUNE 2013

Outreach Approach RENEW SF served as the primary liaison with the North Beach community; the Chinatown. Executive Summary

Southside Pilot Proposal

David Hung, Associate Planner City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Boulevard, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA

The Wiggle Route in Context

STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING June 17, Streetscape Overview Burlington Comprehensive Master Plan

Duwamish Way-finding and CTR Report

Bikeway action plan. Bicycle Friendly Community Workshop March 5, 2007 Rochester, MN

Safe Routes to School: Munroe Elementary Walk Audit Report. Image: Drexel, Barrell & Co.

9/21/2016 VIA . RE: The Knot (DR16-270)

11/28/2016 VIA

CITY MANUALS AND STANDARDS REVIEW

Designing Complete Streets: What you need to know

MAG Town of Cave Creek Bike Study Task 6 Executive Summary and Regional Significance Report

MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. WAY

What Is a Complete Street?

Off-road Trails. Guidance

WELCOME Mission-Geneva Transportation Study

Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) November 21, 2013

Why Zone In on Speed Reduction?

summary of issues and opportunities

Town of Ashland. Downtown Planning Initiative 2 nd Community Workshop. March 29, Presented by:

Cherry Creek Transportation and Land Use Forum September 25, 2013 Meeting Summary

Bonners Ferry US 95 South Hill Report

TRAFFIC ACTION PLAN. Laurie Meadows Neighborhood CITY OF SAN MATEO

4 Goals, Objectives & Actions

Transcription:

Making Strides Toward A More Walkable North Park Sponsors San Diego National Bank Union Bank of California The Otay Ranch Company Quarry Falls by Sudberry Properties San Diego Air Pollution Control District The Members and Contributors of WalkSanDiego March 2006

Introduction & Methodology Introduction The City of San Diego neighborhood of North Park is one of the region s original streetcar suburbs, established just after World War I. It was designed to be highly walkable, with short blocks, an easily navigated grid-street system, and wide sidewalks offset by a planting strip on both sides of the street. With the demise of streetcars in 1949, and catering to growing traffic, the neighborhood suffers today from dominance by automobile traffic. Over the last three years, WalkSanDiego has held three workshops in conjunction with the North Park Community Association to work towards improving the pedestrian environment. The City of San Diego Traffic Engineering Division is responsible for pedestrian safety throughout the city but does not have the resources to work with residents to determine the highest priority improvements. This report is intended to fill that gap for North Park. The report documents the results of community outreach conducted by WalkSanDiego and the North Park Community Association at the three workshops, plus surveying of residents at the North Park Farmer s Market. The area for consideration is the North Park neighborhood except University Avenue, for which substantial pedestrian improvements are being planned by the city and North Park Main Street. Who We Are WalkSanDiego (www.walksandiego.org) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit membership organization dedicated to enhancing the livability of communities throughout the San Diego region by helping cities and neighborhoods make walking a safe and viable choice for people of all abilities. WalkSanDiego has approximately 150 members, a 10-member Board of Directors, and a 10-member Advisory Council of distinguished community leaders. WalkSanDiego s work includes advocating policy change at the national, state, regional and city level, increasing funding for pedestrian improvements and traffic calming, and working with neighborhoods to identify the highest priority needs for pedestrian safety improvements. Acknowledgments The Making Strides project and this report were funded by contributions from San Diego National Bank, Union Bank of California, The Otay Ranch Company, and Quarry Falls by Sudberry Properties. Donations were also provided by some North Park businesses: Hip Hair, RC Awards, the Oki Doky Boutique, Ebey s North Park Vacuum, Coldwell Banker, and the Caspian Café. Logistical and other support for the workshops, and outreach at the North Park Farmers Market were coordinated by Susan Riggs Tinsky and Omar Passons. This report was prepared with the assistance of the San Diego County Air Pollution Control District. WalkSanDiego and the North Park Community Association (NPCA) gratefully acknowledge the support of these organizations and dedicated residents. Walkability Workshops Enhancing Walkability in North Park The three workshops held by WalkSanDiego and the NPCA were: a. October 2002 At NPCA s monthly meeting, WalkSanDiego provided a Walkable Communities presentation and then asked residents to name hotspots they would like to see improved. b. July 2004 National pedestrian expert Dan Burden provided was the speaker at a community forum at Claire de Lune Coffeehouse. Dan explained how to diagnose street design problems and helped residents identify North Park s problem areas and potential solutions. c. July 2005 WalkSanDiego and NPCA held a final workshop at the North Park Community Park in which residents again identified pressing needs for pedestrian improvements. 2

Walking in North Park Positive Walkability Features of North Park Introduction & Methodology The workshops and surveys brought out ways in which North Park is a very walkable community: 1. The neighborhood is compact, densely settled, with many walking-distance destinations. 2. Blocks are short, arranged in a grid pattern, and easily navigated on foot or by bicycle. 3. Commercial and residential buildings have shallow or zero setback from the front property line. This provides interest for walkers, helps maintain eyes on the street for crime prevention, and slows traffic somewhat. 4. Historic bungalow architecture provides interest to walkers. 5. Many children in the neighborhood walk to school, alone or accompanied by parents. 6. The area is well-served by frequent bus service that reaches nearby neighborhoods, Balboa Park, and downtown San Diego within minutes. Why and How Much North Parkers Walk Based on surveys conducted at the North Park Farmers Market in 2003 and 2004, residents, merchants, and visitors to North Park indicated the following reasons for walking (most respondents indicated more than one purpose): 38 walk for exercise or relaxation 29 walk to shop 17 walk to visit friends 10 walk a dog 7 walk to the bus stop 4 walk a child to school or to the school bus 3 walk to commute to work or school 2 walk to the library 2 walk to a park Respondents indicated they walk the following number of hours per week: 8 walk less than 1 hour 13 walk 1-3 hours 13 walk 3-6 hours 11 walk more than 6 hours These survey results support the observation that North Park is a good place to walk, and many people take advantage of its walkability. For that reason, pedestrian improvements in this neighborhood will serve a large number of people, making walking trips for a variety of reasons. A young resident and his companions navigate a residential street. 3

Recommendations Findings and Recommendations Following is a combined summary of community members issues and solutions, as well as WalkSanDiego s recommendations for improvements. Do Everywhere Improvements Walking improvements should be incorporated gradually wherever possible including the following: 1. Crosswalks In addition to providing a safer space for pedestrians to cross streets, crosswalks remind drivers to watch for pedestrians when entering an intersection and encourage calmer driving speeds. Zebra or ladder-style striping provides greater visibility than the standard, two parallel lines. 2. Bulb-outs Curb extensions at the corners of blocks decrease crossing distance and improve visibility of pedestrians. 3. Lane width reductions Narrower lanes calm traffic, especially when combined with street trees, diagonal parking, and/or curb extensions. Zebra or ladder-style striping would make this crosswalk more visible to motorists and help keep vehicles from encroaching over the line. 4. Corner curb ramps Two curb ramps per corner should be installed, each leading directly into the crosswalk. 5. Diagonal parking This arrangement provides two improvements to walkability: reducing street widths and introducing greater side friction to increase driver caution, while also providing additional parking. 6. Reduced perceived pavement width Install shoulder stripes or possibly bike lanes where there is excessive street width. 7. Street lighting Improved lighting reduces nighttime pedestrian collisions and may induce more walking at night and use of transit. 8. Lead pedestrian indicator LPI s provide a 3-second head start for crossing pedestrians while traffic remains stopped. LPI s are particularly helpful near bus stops. 9. Art in infrastructure Public art should be included in infrastructure and redevelopment projects. A good example is the art panels on the new North Park Parking Garage. The unique character and surroundings of North Park Way makes it a very promising street for unique art treatments. 4

Top Priority Areas Recommendations Workshop attendees indicated a number of areas where pedestrian safety improvements are needed. The ten that rose to the top are indicated below. It should be kept in mind that University Avenue was the top priority corridor but was not included since the University Avenue Mobility Project, already underway by the city and North Park Main Street, is pursuing a comprehensive redesign which will address this important street. Many of the priority streets are of strikingly similar character: commercial, mixed use, three lanes with center turn lane, and vehicle volumes are between 12,000 and 14,000 vehicles per day. Most are traditional commercial streets with many pedestrians but few safe crossing opportunities. The business climate in these corridors could be significantly enhanced by making them more pedestrianfriendly. 1 North Park Way between Utah Street and 32nd Street Characteristics: Local, neighborhood, and regional traffic, although light in volume. Two lanes with no turning lanes or turning pockets. Frequent pedestrians walking along and crossing the street, but very limited pedestrian crossing facilities. Land uses are commercial, civic, cultural, and residential. 2,000 Utah Street to 30th Street 7,000 30th Street to 32nd Street Issues: North Park Way parallels University Avenue but is underutilized as a collector. However, the narrow profile, frequent stops, and drainage dips keep traffic speeds down. The pedestrian could benefit still further with better crosswalks. Solutions: With visible crosswalks at the intersections and perhaps public art in a few locations, North Park Way could be a very pleasant, interesting street for pedestrians, reflecting the proximity of arts businesses, the North Park Theatre, and the existing and future North Park Library. The crosswalks themselves could be conceived as works of art to compliment the monthly Ray at Night art celebration that centers in part on North Park Way and Ray Street. North Park Way at Ray Street is a focal point for North Park s growing art scene. 2 30th Street between Upas Street and University Avenue Characteristics: Regional and local traffic, rarely congested. Three lanes, including a two-way center turn-lane. Sidewalks of five feet or wider, with a landscaped buffer between the sidewalk and street. Frequent pedestrians walking along and crossing the street, but very limited crossing facilities. Multiple bus stops. 12,000 5

Recommendations Issues: The entirety of 30th Street through North Park is a pedestrian-oriented commercial corridor that developed as a 1920 s streetcar line. Adjacent uses in this particular segment includes is dominated by single-story businesses but also includes churches, a school, several apartment and office buildings, and a limited number of single-family residences. Businesses can be readily accessed by residents from east and west, making this a potentially significant walking destination for nearby residents. This corridor is used to access freeways and regional arterials. Several factors reduce the perceived friendliness to pedestrians: Vehicles exceeding the speed limit Lack of safe crossing opportunities Absence of stop controls for most of this stretch of 30th Street Utility lines and poles Little or no landscaping Poorly maintained sidewalks and curbs Aging storefronts Solutions: 30th Street has the potential to return to being an important walkable commercial street, but it will succeed only with attractive land uses, a welcoming sidewalk environment, and frequent, safe crossings. The median turn lane provides an opportunity to installed strategically-place raised median islands. Islands, rather than a continuous median, can limit costs while providing safer crossing opportunities. These islands should be used in combination with or complementing corner curb extensions (or bulb-outs ). Highly visible painted crosswalks should also be added in numerous locations to allow safer crossing, particularly if used in combination with refuge islands. Some of the storefronts along 30th Street have been rebuilt completely or revitalized, and more improvements are planned. Where significant renovations are permitted by the Development Services Department, owners should be required to repair the adjacent sidewalk and ensure compliance with disability requirements such as curb ramps and driveway cross-slopes. This includes condominium conversions. 3 30th Street between University Avenue and El Cajon Boulevard Characteristics: Similar to Priority Area 1. This is the commercial center of the community, with significant redevelopment ongoing. Substantially higher pedestrian volumes occur here, with still higher levels expected as development continues. 13,000 Issues: Similar to Priority Area 1. Mid-block crossing is observed frequently. Solutions: Similar to Priority Area 1. Raised medians and properly designed mid-block crosswalks could be very effective at reducing the danger to mid-block crossers. North Park s revitalized commerical center attracts increasing numbers of pedestrians. 6

Recommendations 4 30th Street between El Cajon Boulevard and Adams Avenue Characteristics: Similar to Priority Area 1. With the completion of the Renaissance residential and retail development, many additional vehicle and pedestrian trips are expected to be generated in this area. 9,000 Issues: Similar to Priority Area 1. Solutions: Similar to Priority Area 1. 5 Texas Street from Upas Street to El Cajon Boulevard Characteristics: Two lane collector with no turn lanes. Regional and local traffic. Primarily residential in character. Pedestrians walking along and crossing the street, but very limited pedestrian crossing facilities. 4,000 Upas Street to University Avenue 9,000-12,000 University Avenue to El Cajon Boulevard Issues: Texas Street is a local street which due to its location also serves as an important neighborhood and regional collector. Solutions: As with most sidewalks in North Park, sidewalks on Texas Street are buffered by a planting strip and on-street parking. However, more marked crosswalks are warranted, perhaps enhanced by corner bulb-outs. This treatment is especially needed at Upas Street, where Texas Street leads into Balboa Park s Morley Field sports complex. 6 Upas Street between Texas Street and 30th Street Characteristics: Neighborhood and regional collector through a primarily residential area on the north side, and, west of Pershing, Balboa Park on the south side. 8,000 Alabama Street to Pershing Street 12,000 Pershing Street to Utah Street 8,000 Utah Street to 30th Street (West) 14,000 30th Street (West) to 30th Street (East) Issues: Despite serving as the local community s neighborhood park, Morley Field has no pedestrian facilities linking this key resource to surrounding residential streets. Upas Street is increasingly utilized by commuters to Downtown San Diego. Solutions: Sidewalks on the Balboa Park side of the street are needed, perhaps of a porous aggregate rather than impervious concrete. Also needed are visible marked crosswalks at high-volume pedestrian locations. These include Texas Street, Jacaranda, Pershing Drive (crossing to a tot lot), 28th Street, Utah Street, and 30th Street. Corner bulb-outs should be considered at each of these locations. Between 28th and 30th Streets, the existing middle turn lane provides an opportunity to install median islands to improve crossing safety in key locations. 7

Recommendations 7 Pershing Drive at Redwood Street Characteristics: Pershing Drive is a high-speed arterial connecting Downtown to North Park and Morley Field, but with light volume for a 4-lane road (south of Redwood). Redwood Street is a neighborhood collector, and also a residential street. It serves both regional and local traffic. Frequent pedestrians walking or running along and crossing the street, but very limited pedestrian facilities. Occasional bicyclists, using the inadequate bike lanes. 14,000 Pershing Drive from Redwood Street to Florida Street 7,000 Redwood Street from Pershing Drive to 30th Street Issues: Across Pershing Drive from Redwood Street is a popular frisbee golf course with limited parking. Customers frequently park on the opposite side of Pershing and dodge traffic crossing to the frisbee course. This is a dangerous condition, mixing high-speed traffic with pedestrians. The profile of the road invites speeding. Bike lanes are provided on both sides, but speeding traffic makes these lanes feel unsafe. Overgrown vegetation and debris in the bike lane also sometimes forces bicyclists into the travel lane. Solutions: Plans are already prepared for installing a roundabout in this intersection. However, the roadway itself needs to be narrowed in one of several possible ways to reduce traffic speeds. Potential solutions are narrowing the travel lanes, reducing the number of lanes to one in each direction, installing a median, or altering the curb alignment to narrow the roadbed itself. The bike lanes should be painted wider to allow a greater buffer with traffic. A roundabout is a raised circular island in a major intersection with deflector islands to slow approaching vehicles and provide crossing area. 8 30th Street between Switzer Canyon and Upas Street Characteristics: Regional and local traffic. Frequent pedestrians walking or running along and crossing the street, but very limited crossing opportunities. Occasional bicyclists, but no bike lanes. 11,000 Juniper Street to Redwood Street 10,000 Redwood Street to Upas Issues: Pedestrians frequently use 30th Street to travel between North Park and South Park. Yet, there are no safe crossing areas for a significant distance. Speeds are usually higher than the posted 25 mph. Solutions: Bulb-outs could be used to define the parking lane and help reduce speeds without reducing the road s capacity. This would increase the visibility of pedestrians trying to cross, and improve sightlines for motorists from side streets by removing parked cars close to corners. Potential sites for crosswalks should also be investigated. 8

Recommendations 9 Adams Avenue between 30th Street and Arizona Street Characteristics: Similar to Priority Area 1. 12,000 Issues: Similar to Priority Area 1. Solutions: Similar to Priority Area 1. 10 Park Boulevard at El Cajon Boulevard/Washington Street Characteristics: High-volume, high-speed traffic, and frequent pedestrians. 23,000 El Cajon Boulevard between Park Boulevard and Florida Street 16,000 Park Boulevard between El Cajon Boulevard and Meade Avenue Issues: This intersection is very wide, dominated by inter-neighborhood vehicle traffic, and unwelcoming to pedestrians. It poses a significant barrier to pedestrians. Both the west south legs are blocked to pedestrians, with no warning as they approach from these sides. Solutions: A comprehensive redesign of the intersection is warranted. Redevelopment on any of the surrounding corners could provide funding for a dramatic solution, possibly including undergrounding of east-west traffic. Undergrounding concepts have been developed by students at San Diego s New School of Architecture. In the short-term, the city should consider ways to reopen the closed legs and utilize more visible crosswalk designs. 9

Appendix A Other Issues Identified by the Public Better bike facilities could helpreduce the number of people riding bikes on sidewalks Pedestrian-oriented signage is needed in commercial areas Awnings would provide more shade Wayfinding signs to parking lots would help reduce traffic searching for parking More landscaping is needed in the right-of-way There should be signs indicating where traffic calming treatments have been installed Sidewalk maintenance badly needed in most areas Development Services Department should impose permit conditions to require sidewalk maintenance, ADA corrections, and off-site improvements which have a nexus to the permitted project Specific Areas Needing Attention Community Comments 30th and Lincoln lots of pedestrians, need bulb-outs or median to increase safety and reduce speeding 30th at Upas in front of Jack in the Box Roundabout? Adams Avenue needs crosswalks and possibly a raised median El Cajon/Washington at Park Boulevard reduce crossing distance and vulnerability of pedestrians El Cajon Boulevard crossing opportunities at more intersections Jacaranda through Morley Field (yield at Jacaranda) striping/control is confusing Landis and Utah Streets, Jefferson Elementary behind barrier is gravel. Make nicer; perhaps installing a pocket park Lincoln Street as development occurs, require sidewalk improvements plus bulb-outs. North Park Way between 32nd and Pershing sidewalk maintenance, crosswalks North Park Way (light at Boundary, North Park Way off-ramp) relieve backup by striping for two lanes on the freeway off-ramp Park Boulevard at Robinson Avene Pershing and Redwood pedestrians and bikes crossing Pershing at University Between University and El Cajon residential streets need bulb-outs Texas Street nonsignalized intersections, imbedded crosswalk lights Texas at University Texas Street walkway from Meade to Mission Valley Texas Street everywhere needs safer crossing Texas Street, University to Adams - fast traffic, make safer for crossing University at Boundary confusing for turns, lanes, nothing for pedestrians Upas at Pershing crossing to tot lot Upas at Pershing need clearer stop controls ( all-way stop signs?) Upas fronting Balboa Park, Alabama to Pershing no sidewalks in park, no curb ramps Upas Street generally Upas at Grim drainage an issue during rains 10