Demand Estimation Model for Park-and-Ride Service: Fort Bend County to Central Houston

Similar documents
Ujari Mohite. Vijay Mahal and Vincent Sanders. Revised Ridership Forecasts for the Uptown DBL project. Date: August 17, 2015 INTRODUCTION/SUMMARY:

Guidelines for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations APPENDIX C TRANSIT STATION ACCESS PLANNING TOOL INSTRUCTIONS

Executive Summary. TUCSON TRANSIT ON BOARD ORIGIN AND DESTINATION SURVEY Conducted October City of Tucson Department of Transportation

Flyaway Bus: GIS Analysis on Current and Potential Ridership, Revenue, and Prospective Stations

. ' motion. APPLtlDK.L - L"iLC_t1GLR 201b APPENDIX 7 TECHNICAL MEMOS

Calgary Transit Route 302 Southeast BRT Year One Review June

9 COMMUTER SERVICES: DEMAND EVALUATION OF CORRIDORS

Possible Bike Sharing Stations in UCLA. -Given the Arriving Purple Line Subway UP M206A. March Tsai-wei Wen. Department of Public Policy

Travel and Rider Characteristics for Metrobus

Using GIS and CTPP Data for Transit Ridership Forecasting in Central Florida

Eliminate on-street parking where it will allow for a dedicated bus only lane %

ROUTE 52 ALLENTOWN. Port Authority of Allegheny County

Capital Metro Monthly Ridership Report November 2016 (Fiscal Year 2017)

SOUNDCAST CALIBRATION AND SENSITIVITY TEST RESULTS (DRAFT) TABLE OF CONTENTS. Puget Sound Regional Council. Suzanne Childress.

Capital Metro Monthly Ridership Report December 2016 (Fiscal Year 2017)

Evan Johnson, Tindale Oliver & Associates. Alan Danaher, P.E., PTOE, AICP, PTP

DART Ridership. Board Workshop January 5, 2018

Community Transit Solutions for the Suburbs APTA Annual Meeting Steve Fittante, New Jersey Transit Corporation September 30, 2013

Philadelphia Bus Network Choices Report

Changing Commuting Patterns and Impacts on Planning & Infrastructure. William E. Frawley, AICP Texas A&M Transportation Institute October 3, 2013

City of Davenport CitiBus Public Transportation Study. April 2015

Transportation Trends, Conditions and Issues. Regional Transportation Plan 2030

2010 Pedestrian and Bicyclist Special Districts Study Update

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Ave

Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study

Notice and Agenda of a Meeting of the Board of Directors Capital and Strategic Planning Committee

Everett Transit Action Plan. Community Open House November 16, 2015

BEAR CREEK PARK AND RIDE

What Are The Benefits? How RIDERSHIP + Can Help You. Select RIDERSHIP + Projects

Appendix C. NORTH METRO STATION AREA TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 88th Avenue Station

Route 9 Davidson County Business 85 Service Equity Analysis

Market Factors and Demand Analysis. World Bank

Capital and Strategic Planning Committee. Item III - B. April 12, WMATA s Transit-Oriented Development Objectives

2014 Metro Transit Customer Survey Highlights

I-20 East Transit Initiative. Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting September 9, :00-6:00 PM

VI. Market Factors and Deamnd Analysis

1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey

El Paso to Las Cruces Proposed Rail Service Estimated Ridership and Proposed Schedule

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis

PASSENGER SURVEY RESULTS

I-35W Solutions Alliance Project Update July 13, 2017

Notice and Agenda of a Meeting of the Capital and Strategic Planning Committee of the METRO Board of Directors

Transit Operations in the I-95 Express Lanes

The Broadway SkyTrain Extension

Title. Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee December 12, Brad Larson Metro District MnDOT

Capital Metro Monthly Ridership Report September 2017 (Fiscal Year-end 2017)

I-105 Corridor Sustainability Study (CSS)

BIKE AND RIDE ACCESS AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

July 2016 Monthly Ridership Report

Cobb Community Transit

Interim Transit Ridership Forecast Results Technical Memorandum

Monthly Ridership and Service Level Report March, Safety, Courtesy, Reliability, and the Environment

Cape Cod Regional Transit Authority Comprehensive Service Assessment. December 2015

Rail Station Fact Sheet CentrePort/DFW Airport Station

Commuter Credits Pilot Project

WELCOME BUS RAPID TRANSIT PUBLIC MEETING. MEETING TIME: 5 p.m. - 8 p.m.

Preliminary Transportation Analysis

Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council

TRANSPORTATION & MOBILITY

Regional Alternatives Analysis. Downtown Corridor Tier 2 Evaluation

July 23, Transit Workshop

Key objectives of the survey were to gain a better understanding of:

NJ Transit Mercer County Bus Survey

Gratiot Avenue Transit Study Tech Memo #4: Ridership

Welcome. Wilmington Transit Moving Forward Workshop Presentation. October 16, 2013

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... vii 1 STUDY OVERVIEW Study Scope Study Area Study Objectives

VIRGINIA BEACH TRANSIT EXTENSION STUDY

METRO Now. Transit Leader. One of only four urban. gain bus ridership in Purple and Green Lines. Red Line is one

2016 REGIONAL ORIGIN AND DESTINATION STUDY TDCHR WORKSHOP APRIL 27, 2017

More buses on the way: Balancing act, changes coming to Snoqualmie Valley transit Photos

ITS-NY ANNUAL MEETING Bus Rapid Transit in New York City: Bus Lane Operations on One-Way Arterial Streets

Appendix T 1: Additional Supporting Data

Webinar- Importance of Multi- Modal Transit Connections and Fare Policy for Regional Transit Mobility & Equity

REGIONAL HOUSEHOLD TRAVEL SURVEY:

Westside Transportation Access Needs Assessment - Short and Long Term Improvements

Title VI Fare Change Equity Analysis

US 19 Pedestrian and Bicycle Safe Access to Transit Corridor Study

Appendix F: Detailed Modeling Results

VIRGINIA RAILWAY EXPRESS

THE 2010 MSP REGION TRAVEL BEHAVIOR INVENTORY (TBI) REPORT HOME INTERVIEW SURVEY. A Summary of Resident Travel in the Twin Cities Region

Intermodal Connections with Light Rail in Phoenix, AZ Wulf Grote, P.E. Director, Planning & Development

TRB Managed Lanes Conference May 22 24, 2012, Oakland, CA

Model Applications for Oakland Park Boulevard Transit Corridor Study

Benefits for the Bronx, Brooklyn, Queens and Staten Island

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Topics To Be Covered. Summarize Tier 2 Council Direction Discuss Mill and Ash Alternatives Next Steps

I-20 East Transit Initiative

BID Strategy Group and Stakeholders Meeting. April 17, 2018

Rail Station Fact Sheet University of Dallas Station

DAILY TRIPS (OUTBOUND/INBOUND) Weekdays 6:05 AM to 11:23 PM 30/30/ /28 Saturday 6:15 AM to 8:23 PM 60/60 24/23 Sunday / /

Project Narrative. Albuquerque, NM. July 31, 2015

Highway Transitway Corridor Study

Tunnel Reconstruction South 5 th Street Association October 16, 2018

Feasibility Study of Pedestrian Crossings Along Route 7, East of Cascades Parkway and West of Dranesville Road. October 3, 2017

SOLTRANS BOARD MEETING SUPPLEMENTAL REPORTS / HANDOUTS January 15, 2015 MEETING HANDOUTS

Cotton Belt Corridor Regional Rail Project

Capital Metro Monthly Ridership Report January 2018 (Fiscal Year 2018)

METRO Light Rail: Changing Transit Markets in the Phoenix Metropolitan Area

DAILY TRIPS (OUTBOUND) Monday-Friday 6:45 AM to 7:40 PM 30/30/30 26 Saturday 6:45 AM to 6:40 PM 30/30 24 Sunday - - -

Transcription:

Demand Estimation Model for Park-and-Ride Service: Fort Bend County to Central Houston 1

Investigation of past and present methods/thoughts LITERATURE/SOURCE REVIEW RELATIVE DEMAND ESTIMATION 2

General Notions About Shape of Market-Shed for Park-and-Rides Limited by distance to facility vs. destination Facilities close together may reduce each other s market generation effectiveness Riders willingness to backtrack limited Parabola is most common shape 50% of riders typically live within 2.5 mile radius circle around facility 3

4

A close look at nine park-and-ride facilities CASE STUDY ANALYSIS OF HOUSTON AREA PARK-AND-RIDES 5

Location of Case Study Facilities 27 mi 27 mi 25 mi 21 mi 20 mi 21 mi 28 mi Nine Metro Facilities: 4, Spring 7, Kingwood 8, Townsen 18, Bay Area 49, Grand Parkway 51, Kingsland 55, Cypress 56, Northwest Station Current FBC Facilities: 42, AMC Movie Theater 43, University of Houston 22 mi 24 mi 5 miles 10 miles 20 miles 24 mi 6

Observations 2.5 mi radius circle covers approximately 37% of riders based on 2008 or 2009 data for 8 case study facilities Parabola can describe general distribution Findings concur with research 2.5 mile radius circle to measure/estimate demand may safely represent 37% of riders 7

Summary of Case Study Average distance to CBD: 24.3 miles Average peak weekday CBD bound riders: 726 Average # of inbound bus trips: 25 Average boardings per bus trip at P&R: 27.9 8

Use the Census online tool to obtain paired geography analysis of worker flows by income bracket. OBTAIN LEHD DATA FOR ANALYSIS 9

LEHD OnTheMap Data, US Census Bureau Available annually from 2002-2010 Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) Links home to work Census Blocks Work data, not exactly travel data OnTheMap is online tool for analysis 10

Paired Analysis to Get Worker Flows Selecting 2.5 mile radius around P&R Selecting 1.0 mile radius to encompass CBD Tabulating worker flow by income brackets $1,250 per month or less $1,251 to $3,333 per month More than $3,333 per month 11

Step 1. Select areas for analysis 2.5 mile radius circle around facility used to identify home Census Blocks 1 mile radius circle around CBD used to identify work Census Block 12

Step 2. Select analysis settings 13

Step 3. Run analysis, record findings 14

Use of existing, local, and LEHD data to estimate demand for P&R service MODEL FOR P&R DEMAND ESTIMATION USING LEHD DATA 15

Demand Estimation Model Simplified Steps Obtain initial LEHD and P&R data Clean, arrange P&R data for use Create case study rates by combining P&R and LEHD data Obtain LEHD data for study sites Estimate demand for P&R services by applying rates from case study to LEHD data for new P&R sites 16

Location of Final Study Site Current FBC Facilities: 42, AMC Movie Theater 43, University of Houston Workgroup selected site for service/cost scenario analysis: 43, University of Houston CBD 22 mi 5 miles 10 miles 24 mi 20 miles 17

43, University of Houston 18

Based on Eight Case Study Sites: Model Inputs Average distance to CBD: 24.3 miles Average peak weekday CBD bound riders: 767 Average # of inbound bus trips: 28 Average boardings per bus trip at P&R: 27.9 Average LEHD worker flow to CBD: 1,579 Case study P&R worker-flow capture ratio for AM riders traveling to Central Houston from the 2.5 mile circle around P&R facility: Low estimate 10.72% Medium or average estimate 17.76% High estimate 28.18% 19

Things to Note Estimated ridership is to Central Houston in peak hours, does not include other riders Estimated ridership is for transit services equivalent to the high-quality service at the 8 case study P&Rs The five options for P&R service in FBC each affect estimated demand differently 20

Ridership Estimation: Avg/Low/High LOW SCENARIO: RIDERSHIP GENERATION SIMILAR TO THREE LOWEST CASE STUDY PARK-AND-RIDE FACILITIES Grand Parkway, Kingwood, and Spring Analysis P&R Site On or near UH Campus in Sugar Land (workgrp agreed assumption) Current Lot Spaces Future Lot Capacity Workers Living Within 2.5 miles of P&R with Jobs in Houston CBD Model Worker Flow P&R Capture Ratio (LOW) Earn $1,250 month or less Earn $1,251 to $3,333 More than $3,333 per month Distance to next Metro competing parkand-ride facility in corridor: Estimated Demand for Peak Hour P&R Service to Central Houston 576?? 1,137 10.72% 4.0% 7.3% 88.7% 9 333 AVERAGE SCENARIO: RIDERSHIP GENERATION SIMILAR TO ALL CASE STUDY PARK-AND-RIDE FACILITIES Analysis P&R Site On or near UH Campus in Sugar Land (workgrp agreed assumption) Current Lot Spaces Future Lot Capacity Workers Living Within 2.5 miles of P&R with Jobs in Houston CBD Model Worker Flow P&R Capture Ratio (AVERAGE) Earn $1,250 month or less Earn $1,251 to $3,333 More than $3,333 per month Distance to next Metro competing parkand-ride facility in corridor: Estimated Demand for Peak Hour P&R Service to Central Houston 576?? 1,137 17.76% 4.0% 7.3% 88.7% 9 532 HIGH SCENARIO: RIDERSHIP GENERATION SIMILAR TO THREE HIGHEST CASE STUDY PARK-AND-RIDE FACILITIES Townsen, Cypress, and Northwest Station Analysis P&R Site On or near UH Campus in Sugar Land (workgrp agreed assumption) Current Lot Spaces Future Lot Capacity Workers Living Within 2.5 miles of P&R with Jobs in Houston CBD Model Worker Flow P&R Capture Ratio (HIGH) Earn $1,250 month or less Earn $1,251 to $3,333 More than $3,333 per month Distance to next Metro competing parkand-ride facility in corridor: Estimated Demand for Peak Hour P&R Service to Central Houston 576?? 1,137 28.18% 4.0% 7.3% 88.7% 9 876 21

Ridership Estimation by Option Options Description Example from Case Studies Operator Type of Service 2 3 4 5 Fort Bend Shuttle Extension METRO 262 New Fort Bend Route New METRO Route Loudoun County Mesquite to DART Baytown P&R Cobb County Loudoun County GRTA Express Planned Brazoria P&R The Woodlands Express Fort Bend County (Contractor) METRO Shuttle from FBC to Commuter Express with West Bellfort Park & Ride[1] stops at Westwood P&R Fort Bend County (Contractor) Park & Ride METRO Park & Ride Type of Vehicle Service Assumptions Cost Model Small transit bus 32 seats Buses operate from P&R in FBC on a schedule to meet METRO Route 265 West Bellfort P&R Current FBC contract with First Transit Small transit bus 32 seats Current METRO vehicle assign Selected bus trips on the Buses operate from P&R METRO Route 262 start/end in FBC directly to at P&R in FBC downtown Houston METRO cost model for Baytown P&R $5.00 each way Fare Assumptions See Option 1 from Sugar Land ESTIMATED AM PEAK RIDERSHIP - Fort Bend County to Central Houston Current FBC contract with First Transit $5.00 each way Assume current METRO Park & Ride vehicle Buses operate from P&R in FBC directly to downtown Houston METRO cost model for Planned Brazoria P&R $5.00 each way Option 2 Option 3 Options 4 and 5 Non-Stop P&R to Downtown 35% of Low 50% of Low 75% of Low 100% of Low Non-stop Non-Stop Non-stop Non-Stop Low Medium High Location P&R P&R P&R P&R On or near UH 83 167 250 333 333 532 876 22