Mink. Pelt Production Down 10 Percent

Similar documents
Catfish Feed Deliveries

Overview of the U. S. Trout Industry

Agaricus and Specialty Mushroom Number of Growers, Sales, Price, and Value United States: , , and , , ,564

Agaricus and Specialty Mushroom Number of Growers, Sales, Price, and Value United States: , , and , , ,619

Agaricus and Specialty Mushroom Number of Growers, Sales, Price, and Value United States: , , and , , ,514

Agaricus and Specialty Mushroom Number of Growers, Sales, Price, and Value United States: , , and

Agaricus and Specialty Mushroom Number of Growers, Sales, Price, and Value United States: , , and

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service

Agricultural Weather Assessments World Agricultural Outlook Board

Agricultural Weather Assessments World Agricultural Outlook Board

SST Installation Guide. Brenda Land, Sanitary Engineer

2011 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation

GROWS. Hello 4-H families, Please take the time to read through this months newsletter and mark the below dates on your calendars.

Horse and Pony Project Worksheet

Mount Snow Disc Golf Course and Mountain Bike Race Course Project

STEPLOG LOG BOOK. Walk Your Way to a Healthier You. A Walking Program for Maryland

LAKES - NACHES RANGER DISTRICT

'30"W '25"W 82 43'20"W 94B 94C 94C1 56 NOLICHUCKY

News Release Northeastern Regional Field Office 4050 Crums Mill Road, Suite 203 Harrisburg, PA

Traffic Safety Facts 2007 Data

Iowa 4-H Animal and Poultry Identification, Weighing, and Exhibiting Requirements for County, State and Interstate Shows

Black Homicide Victimization in the Great Lakes States

There are three major federal data sources that we evaluate in our Bicycle Friendly States ranking:

Korell Outfitter and Guide Special-Use Permit Amendment

ALABAMA HUNTING SURVEY

Objectives. Required Materials:

ECONOMIC IMP ACT REPORT 2018

Section J. Games & Activities

Education Committee Economic Background and Issue Review

, PIl USDA/Sll-B77 CO'T'l'ON', GINNING CIIARGE;S, HARVESTING PRAC'l'ICES, ' AND SELECTED MARKETING COSTS, 19f!2/93 SEASON.

Target Shooting by Hunters and Their Use of Shooting Ranges: 1975, 1991, and 2011

OREGON 4-H SHOOTING SPORTS

MarketNews. Fresh Processing 91, Crop 2017 Crop 2018 Crop

Internet Use Among Illinois Hunters: A Ten Year Comparison

TABLE C: STATE MANDATES AND FUNDING LEVELS

Contribution of the Bison Industry to the North Dakota Economy

Catalogue no X. Cattle Statistics

MISSION STATEMENT 4-H EMPOWERS YOUTH TO REACH THEIR FULL POTENTIAL WORKING

A Comparison of Highway Construction Costs in the Midwest and Nationally

Outlook for Livestock and Poultry. Michael Jewison World Agricultural Outlook Board, USDA

Where the HSUS Spends it s Money HSUS 2006 Tax Return Analysis by Alice Fix

PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY 4-H TALENT SHOW September 9, 2017

FD040. Members Book. I m a Cloverbud! Name: Club Name: 4-H Year:

Ravalli County 4-H Leader Enrollment NEW Leaders. Ravalli County 4-H Committees & Activities:

THE FUTURE OF SALES TAX REVENUE

Traffic Safety Facts. State Traffic Data Data. Overview

Matching respondents over time and assessing non-response bias. Respondents sometimes left age or sex blank (n=52 from 2001 or 2004 and n=39 from

DOT HS November 2009 Geospatial Analysis of Rural Motor Vehicle Traffic Fatalities

Statement of Philosophy for Cooperation Between Fairs and Michigan State University Extension

OUR VISION A WORLD IN WHICH YOUTH AND ADULTS LEARN, GROW, AND WORK TOGETHER AS CATALYSTS FOR POSTIVE CHANGE

Horse Project Assessment Guide

Changing Demographics in the U.S. and the Impact on Congress

COOPERATIVE EXTENSION Bringing the University to You

Economic Impact of the Michigan Equine Industry, 2006

Goldman Sachs Agricultural Biotech Forum New York, NY. March 7, 2012

By Rosann Ohlund Englebretson. Illustrated by Patricia Ohlund Abbott. Edited by Madeleine Sigman-Grant

1/12/17 - Final Doddridge County 4-H & FFA Livestock Show and Sale Rules and Regulations

TRAPPING HARVEST STATISTICS. Division of Fish and Wildlife 500 Lafayette Road, Box 20 Saint Paul, MN (651)

TRAPPING HARVEST STATISTICS. Division of Fish and Wildlife 500 Lafayette Road, Box 20 Saint Paul, MN (651)

Crook County Fair. August 8-12, Crook County 4-H Clover. Youth of the Month. Summer Days and Country Ways

GROWS. The BIZ - February

Purpose of the Efficiency Program Industry By State and Region Appendices and Limitations of Data

Feeds, Price and Vola0lity

BEEF 31. Matt Blankenship Megan Blankenship West Burlington, New York. Friday, September 23, am Arena 1

BMO Capital Markets New York Road Show New York, New York. December 5, 2013

CHAPTER 6. APPENDICES

SIA SNOW SPORTS PARTICIPANT STUDY

Commentary 2/10/20044:39 PM H Flock statistics For 2003.xls

PAPERLESS NEWSLETTER. December 2016 DATES TO REMEMBER

Goldman Sachs U.S. Emerging/SMID Cap Growth Conference. New York, New York

MEDICAID EXPENDITURES FOR LONG-TERM SERVICES AND SUPPORTS: 2011 UPDATE

BMO Capital Markets 2014 Farm to Market Conference New York, New York. May 21, 2014

The Mind of the Triathlete

Sidoti & Company, LLC West Coast Road Show. San Francisco, California

HANDICAP ACTIVE AND INACTIVE SEASON SCHEDULE

Occupant Protection Laws

Looking for some great ideas for Fair?

Occupant Protection Laws

4-H Primary Member Personal Development Report for the program year ending

An Initial Analysis of the Mink Oil Market: Preliminary Report to Morgan County, Utah

Club Level Recognition

June H Highlights

Michigan State University participates in the

Occupant Protection Laws

2012 U. S. Catfish Database

LIVESTOCK CAREER DEVELOPMENT EVENT

HEREFORD SHOW BEEF BEEF 35

Profile and Economic Impacts of Agriculture and Natural Resource Industries in the Suwannee River Basin Counties of Florida

GUIDELINES FOR HVI TESTING

LOTTERY CIRCLE MANUAL

Legal Heat: 50 State Guide to Firearm Laws and Regulations

Kalkaska County 4-H Livestock Market and Show Rules Exhibitor Requirements:

Goldman Sachs Eighteenth Annual Agribusiness Conference New York, New York. March 12, 2014

Wildlife Watching in the U.S.: The Economic Impacts on National and State Economies in 2006

4-H Youth Development Program. Prince George's County. maison. At-A-Glance Booklet

TABLE 3. Level of Activity in State Financial Assurance Funds 2016

Multifamily Market Survey

MSU EXTENSION - OAKLAND COUNTY 4-H YOUTH DEVELOPMENT HORSE & PONY PROJECT RECORD BOOK

LIVESTOCK CAREER DEVELOPMENT EVENT

Transcription:

Mink ISSN: 19491549 Released July 14, 017, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Pelt Production Down 10 Percent Mink pelt production in the United States in 016 totaled 3.3 million pelts, down 10 percent from 015. Wisconsin, the largest mink producing State, produced 1.0 million pelts. Utah, the second largest producing State, produced 768 thousand pelts. The number of pelts by color class as a percent of the total United States production in 016 is as follows: Black at 51 percent, Mahogany at 1 percent, Blue Iris at 7 percent, and White at 6 percent. The remaining color classes accounted for 15 percent. Value of pelts produced during the 016 crop year was $116 million, down 1 percent from $118 million a year ago. The average price per pelt for the 016 crop year was $35.00, up $3.00 from $3.00 in 015. Female mink bred to produce kits in 017 totaled 741 thousand, down 3 percent from the previous year. Percent of total females bred to produce kits in 017 by color class as is follows: Black at 50 percent, Mahogany at 1 percent, White at 7 percent, and Blue Iris at 6 percent. The remaining classes accounted for 16 percent.

Mink Pelts Produced United States Million 3.8 3.6 3.4 3. 3.0.8.6.4 1997 1999 001 003 005 007 009 011 013 015 Due to sequestration the Mink report was suspended in 01. Mink Average Price Per Pelt United States Dollars $100 $90 $80 $70 $60 $50 $40 $30 $0 1997 1999 001 003 005 007 009 011 013 015 Due to sequestration the Mink report was suspended in 01. Mink (July 017)

Mink Pelts Produced and Females Bred by Color Class United States: 015017 Color class Black... Demi/Wild... Pastel... Sapphire... Blue Iris... Mahogany... Pearl... Lavender... Violet... White... Other... Pelts produced Females bred to produce kits 015 016 016 017 (number) (number) (number) (number) 1,853,700 74,80 105,400 114,480 78,40 861,850 95,700,460 59,50 05,910 11,510 1,685,450 6,110 98,600 135,080 6,130 711,30 103,640 3,310 54,550 199,570 8,80 38,890 15,40 6,90 30,370 53,370 163,160 5,640 7,750 14,100 45,710 1,780 369,930 14,170 4,750 3,840 44,60 155,730 4,700 9,90 1,350 50,760 1,670 Total... 3,68,960 3,317,040 767,110 740,810 Mink Pelts Produced, Average Price, and Value United States: 1997016 Year 1997... 1998... 1999... 000... 001... 00... 003... 004... 005... 006... Pelts produced Average marketing price Value of mink pelts (number) (dollars) (dollars),993,300,938,100,81,500,666,100,565,300,607,300,549,000,558,100,637,800,858,800 33.10 4.80 33.70 34.00 33.50 30.60 40.10 47.10 60.90 48.40 99,078,30 7,864,880 94,781,50 90,647,400 85,937,550 79,783,380 10,14,900 10,486,510 160,64,00 138,365,90 007... 008... 009... 010... 011... 01 1... 013... 014... 015... 016... (NA) Not available. 1 Due to sequestration the Mink report was suspended.,88,00,80,700,866,700,840,00 3,091,470 (NA) 3,544,610 3,741,150 3,68,960 3,317,040 65.70 41.60 65.10 81.90 94.30 (NA) 56.30 57.70 3.00 35.00 185,81,740 117,341,10 186,6,170 3,61,380 91,55,61 (NA) 199,561,543 15,864,355 117,854,70 116,096,400 Mink (July 017) 3

Pelts Produced by Color Class Selected States and United States: 015 States Black Demi/Wild Pastel Sapphire Blue Iris Mahogany Idaho... Illinois... Montana... Oregon... Washington... 19,000 68,000 50,000 44,000 100,000 3,700 57,000 0,000 35,000 300,000 58,000 780,000 10,000 7,000 9,000 17,500 34,000 14,500 9,000 40,000 33,000 77,000 17,000,00 19,000 193,000 37,000 78,000 360,000 135,000 9,000 8,80 53,900 17,980 53,0 58,850 1,853,700 74,80 105,400 114,480 78,40 States Pearl Lavender Violet White Other Total Idaho... Illinois... Montana... Oregon... Washington... 14,500 6,000 8,000 11,500 158,000 6,000 861,850 37,00 98,700 96,300 60,50 65,50 14,900 77,800 33,900 86,770 867,880 71,800 1,316,610 95,700 7,960 33,50 8,410 5,510 1,330 95,700,460 59,50 05,910 11,510 3,68,960 Represents zero. Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. 1 Other States include New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, South Dakota, Virginia, and some pelts from the above listed States that were not published to avoid disclosing individual operations. Published color classes may not add to the State total to avoid disclosing individual operations. 4 Mink (July 017)

Pelts Produced by Color Class Selected States and United States: 016 States Black Demi/Wild Pastel Sapphire Blue Iris Mahogany Idaho... Illinois... Montana... Oregon... Washington... 113,000 48,000 45,000 49,000 60,000 15,000 8,000 60,000 39,000 730,000 17,000 8,000 34,000 1,500,300 9,500 8,500 50,000 44,000 56,000 11,500 1,900 116,000 175,000 35,000 1,000 61,000 95,000 91,000 98,450 6,110 19,600 8,80 40,730 53,30 1,685,450 6,110 98,600 135,080 6,130 States Pearl Lavender Violet White Other Total Idaho... Illinois... Montana... Oregon... Washington... 1,000 6,500 7,000 133,000 5,000 711,30 340,150 81,100 88,070 64,500 04,580 11,900 74,680 308,800 67,540 768,010 55,080 1,196,310 103,640 11,310 54,550 33,070 3,80 56,30 103,640 3,310 54,550 199,570 8,80 3,317,040 Represents zero. Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. 1 Other States include New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, South Dakota, Virginia, and some pelts from the above listed States that were not published to avoid disclosing individual operations. Published color classes may not add to the State total to avoid disclosing individual operations. Mink (July 017) 5

Female Mink Bred to Produce Kits by Color Class Selected States and United States: 016 States Black Demi/Wild Pastel Sapphire Blue Iris Mahogany Idaho... Illinois... Montana... Oregon... Washington... 8,000 15,000 13,500 1,500 1,000 4,000 5,500 70,000 8,000 156,000 1,600 3,500 4,800 3,600 9,000 3,300,300 3,000 10,500 8,500 13,000 3,400 610 5,000 41,000 10,000 13,500,900 70,000 15,500 0,390 10,30 9,50,770 11,360 10,60 38,890 15,40 6,90 30,370 53,370 States Pearl Lavender Violet White Other Total Idaho... Illinois... Montana... Oregon... Washington... 5,000 7,500,00 7,500 7,000 163,160 81,0 3,870 6,760 17,640 48,40 3,780 17,640 63,500 16,130 190,090 1,10 54,490 5,640,750 6,600 9,010 1,780 11,630 5,640 7,750 14,100 45,710 1,780 767,110 Represents zero. Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. 1 Other States include New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, South Dakota, Virginia, and some pelts from the above listed States that were not published to avoid disclosing individual operations. Published color classes may not add to the State total to avoid disclosing individual operations. 6 Mink (July 017)

Female Mink Bred to Produce Kits by Color Class Selected States and United States: 017 States Black Demi/Wild Pastel Sapphire Blue Iris Mahogany Idaho... Illinois... Montana... Oregon... Washington... 4,000 15,000 1,500 14,500 10,500 4,000 5,500 65,000 6,000 155,000 6,500 3,400 6,500 9,500 3,100,00 3,600 10,000 10,500 1,500 1,600 510,000 37,000 11,500 15,500 1,900 65,000 14,000 19,930 7,670 5,350 3,440 8,010 10,830 369,930 14,170 4,750 3,840 44,60 States Pearl Lavender Violet White Other Total Idaho... Illinois... Montana... Oregon... Washington... 5,500 1,900,100 7,000 35,000 640 155,730 7,80 3,900 6,730 19,900 47,060,870 13,780 6,300 14,680 178,030 10,100 57,10 4,700 3,790 10,450 6,660 1,030 11,50 4,700 9,90 1,350 50,760 1,670 740,810 Represents zero. Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. 1 Other States include New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, South Dakota, Virginia, and some pelts from the above listed States that were not published to avoid disclosing individual operations. Published color classes may not add to the State total to avoid disclosing individual operations. Mink (July 017) 7

Statistical Methodology Survey Procedures: Mink production data are collected from early May through late May from all known producers. Individual NASS Field Offices maintain a list of all known mink producers and use known sources of producers to update their lists. All known mink producers are mailed a questionnaire and given adequate time to respond by mail. Those who do not respond by mail are telephoned or enumerated in person. Care is exercised to account for all operations. Major auction houses, which handle producer sales, provide mink pelt price data in June. Prices are collected at the point of first sale, before marketing costs are deducted. Estimation Procedures: All data are analyzed for unusual values. Data from each operation are compared to their own past operating profile and to trends from similar operations. Data for missing operations are estimated based on similar operations or historical data. Field offices prepare these estimates by using a combination of survey indications and historic trends. Individual State estimates are reviewed by the Agricultural Statistics Board for reasonableness. Revision Policy: Revisions to previous estimates are made to improve yeartoyear and itemtoitem relationships. Estimates for the previous year are subject to revision when current estimates are made. Reliability: Mink production estimates are based on a census of all known active producers and therefore, have no sampling variability. However, estimates are subject to errors such as omissions, duplication, mistakes in reporting, recording, and processing data. While these errors cannot be measured directly, they are minimized through strict quality control in the data collection process and a careful review of all reported data for consistency and reasonableness. To assist in evaluating the reliability of the estimates in this report, the Root Mean Square Error is shown for selected items in the following table. The Root Mean Square Error is a statistical measure based on past performance and is computed using the differences between first and final estimates. The Root Mean Square Error for mink pelts produced over the past 10 years is 0.8 percent. This means that chances are out of 3 that the final estimate will not be above or below the current estimate of 3.3 million pelts by more than 0.8 percent. Chances are 9 out of 10 that the difference will not exceed 1.4 percent. Reliability of Mink Estimates [Based on data for the past ten years] Item Root mean square error 90 percent confidence level Difference between first and latest estimate Average Smallest Largest Below latest Years Above latest (percent) (percent) (1,000) (1,000) (1,000) (number) (number) Pelts produced... 0.8 1.4 16 0 66 6 Females bred... 0.9 1.7 4 0 15 5 8 Mink (July 017)

Information Contacts Listed below are the commodity specialists in the Livestock Branch of the National Agricultural Statistics Service to contact for additional information. Email inquiries may be sent to nass@nass.usda.gov Vacant, Chief, Livestock Branch... (0) 703570 Bruce Boess, Head, Poultry and Specialty Commodities Section... (0) 704447 Aaron Cosgrove Egg Products, Poultry Slaughter, Turkey Hatchery, Turkeys Raised... (0) 690337 Alissa CowellMytar Cold Storage... (0) 704751 Brenda Hill Catfish Production, Trout Production... (0) 706147 Tom Kruchten Census of Aquaculture... (0) 6904870 Kim Linonis Layers, Eggs... (0) 690863 Joshua O Rear Cost of Pollination, Honey, Honey Bee Colonies... (0) 6903676 Miste Salmon Broiler Hatchery, Chicken Hatchery, Mink... (0) 70344 Mink (July 017) 9

Access to NASS Reports For your convenience, you may access NASS reports and products the following ways: All reports are available electronically, at no cost, on the NASS web site: www.nass.usda.gov Both national and state specific reports are available via a free email subscription. To setup this free subscription, visit www.nass.usda.gov and click on National or State in upper right corner above search box to create an account and select the reports you would like to receive. For more information on NASS surveys and reports, call the NASS Agricultural Statistics Hotline at (800) 779540, 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. ET, or email: nass@nass.usda.gov. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination against its customers, employees, and applicants for employment on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, sex, gender identity, religion, reprisal, and where applicable, political beliefs, marital status, familial or parental status, sexual orientation, or all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program, or protected genetic information in employment or in any program or activity conducted or funded by the Department. (Not all prohibited bases will apply to all programs and/or employment activities.) If you wish to file a Civil Rights program complaint of discrimination, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form (PDF), found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html, or at any USDA office, or call (866) 63999 to request the form. You may also write a letter containing all of the information requested in the form. Send your completed complaint form or letter to us by mail at U.S. Department of Agriculture, Director, Office of Adjudication, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 0509410, by fax (0) 690744 or email at program.intake@usda.gov.