Reconstruction of fisheries catches for Bosnia-Herzegovina: Davis Iritani, Leonie Färber, Kyrstn Zylich and Dirk Zeller

Similar documents
An updated catch reconstruction of the marine fisheries of Taiwan from Esther Divovich, Leonie Färber, Soohyun Shon and Kyrstn Zylich

FISHERIES CATCH DATA RECONSTRUCTIONS :

Update of the fisheries catch reconstruction of Corsica (France), Frédéric Le Manach and Daniel Pauly

Counting the fish catch - why don t the numbers match?

How much fish are we really catching?

Fisheries Centre. Working Paper Series. The University of British Columbia. Working Paper #

Fisheries and Global Warming: Impacts on Marine Ecosystems

Historical Fisheries Catch Reconstruction for Lebanon (GSA 27), Manal R. Nader, Shadi Indary and Nazanin Roshan Moniri

The State of the World Marine Fisheries (II): Solutions for the World and Brazil Daniel Pauly Sea Around Us Fisheries Centre, UBC

Robin Ramdeen, Kyrstn Zylich, and Dirk Zeller

Synthesis of underreported small-scale fisheries catch in Pacific island waters

Kyrstn Zylich, Sarah Harper, and Dirk Zeller

OCEAN2012 Transforming European Fisheries

Bahamas Catch Reconstruction: Fisheries Trends in a Tourism-Driven Economy ( ) Nicola S. Smith and Dirk Zeller

The State of the Ocean and the impact of subsidies. Daniel Pauly Sea Around Us project Fisheries Centre, UBC

Fisheries Centre. Working Paper Series. The University of British Columbia. Working Paper #

IOTC-2016-WPTT18-INFO3 Received: 4 November 2016

SWEDEN S FISHERIES CATCHES IN THE BALTIC SEA ( ) 1

Global marine fisheries discards: A synthesis of reconstructed data

Reconstruction of total marine fisheries catches for the Pitcairn Islands ( ) 1

Reconstruction of total marine fisheries catches for Germany in the North Sea ( )

OCEAN2012 Fish Dependence Day - UK

Indicator Fact Sheet (FISH11) Catches by major species and areas

Fisheries catch reconstructions: Islands, Part II. Harper and Zeller 97

DEVELOPMENT AID AT A GLANCE

Rebuilding depleted Baltic fish stocks lessons learned

The Fisheries and Aquaculture Sector in LITHUANIA

Super-trawlers: Destructive or Sustainable? Public Hearing in the European Parliament 9 October 2017

10.3 Advice May 2014

WESTERN MEDITERRANEAN

Fisheries catch statistics for Uruguay María Inés Lorenzo, Omar Defeo, Nazanin Roshan Moniri and Kyrstn Zylich

EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 23 May 2013 (OR. en) 2011/0364 (COD) PE-CONS 76/12 PECHE 549 ENV 952 CODEC 3067 OC 765

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE NINTH REGULAR SESSION August 2013 Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia

Why the International Community Needs to Help Create Marine Reserves

Coral Reefs of the World 7. Dawit Tesfamichael Daniel Pauly Editors. The Red Sea Ecosystem and Fisheries

Possible effects on fishing from the Ross Sea Region MPA Proposal

DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2017/2120(INI)

Reconstruction of mainland Portugal isheries catches F Leitão, V Baptista, K Erzini, D Iritani and D Zeller

Appendix Template for Submission of Scientific Information To Describe Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas

"Present status of Tropical tuna fisheries in Iran"

Summary of Preliminary Results of Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis, 2018

Data-poor fisheries in West Africa: Past, present and future? Dyhia Belhabib Sea Around Us Project

How illegal discarding. failing EU fisheries. and citizens. How illegal discarding in. fisheries and citizens. Executive summary

Sustainable coastal fishery in the Baltic Sea in Jurkalne, Latvia

CCAMLR MPA Edited June 2017

FISHING ACTIVITY: SEABED TRAWLING

Reconstruction of marine fisheries catches for St. Barthélémy and St. Martin (French Caribbean, )

Evaluation of effects of management options for the recreational cod fishery in the western Baltic Sea

ISSN Fisheries catch reconstructions: Fisheries Centre Research Reports

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Agricultura y la Alimentación

Balancing food security and biodiversity in the ocean

Sustainable fisheries and aquaculture in the Mediterranean Pêcheries et aquaculture soutenables en Méditerranée

Re: Consultation on the addition of narwhal and two bowhead whale populations to the SARA List

RECONSTRUCTION OF MARINE FISHERIES CATCHES FOR GUADELOUPE FROM

Reconstruction of coral reef fisheries catches for U.S. associated islands in the Western Pacific Region, 1950 to 2002

Fish Conservation and Management

Nordatlantisk Fiskeriministerkonference i Shediac 29. august 2017

ISSN Fisheries catch reconstructions: Fisheries Centre Research Reports. Islands, Part IV

Global State of IUU. Evidence-based risk assessments (sustainability, legality and traceability). John Pearce

Official Journal of the European Union L 248/17

Fisheries and Global Warming: Impacts on Marine Ecosystems. Daniel Pauly Sea Around Us

ADJUSTING FOR CONTEXT IN EVALUATING NATIONAL FISHERIES

SOMALIA National Report to the Scientific Committee of the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission, 2015

NEMO PROJECT SCIENTIFIC MONITORING PLAN

Advice June 2012

Outline of the Position Duties and Responsibilities

Socioeconomic Characteristics of Payang Seine (Lampara) and Driftnet Fisheries in West Sumatra, Indonesia

Shark catch characteristics by national longliner fleets in Madagascar

THE FOURTH GLOBAL FISHERIES ENFORCEMENT TRAINING WORKSHOP

Modifications to Gulf Reef Fish and South Atlantic Snapper Grouper Fishery Management Plans

Derelict fishing gear and other marine debris: Australia and the Asia Pacific

ACTION TO COMBAT ILLEGAL FISHING AND PROTECTING THE ENDANGERED FISH SPECIES IN AFRICA

The Implications of Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated (IUU) Fishing in Production cost for Marine water small-scale fisheries: A Case

Romania Systematic Country Diagnostic

Michael Cramer MEP. Closing Plenary Velo-City Global. Cycling in Europe. Presentation by Michael Cramer Taipei, March 1 st 2016

State of Small pelagic Fish resources and its implications for Food Security and Nutrition

P.O.Box 9152, Dar es Salaam TANZANIA.

Fishing down the marine food webs in the Hellenic seas

Preliminary reconstruction of Thailand s fisheries catches: Lydia Teh, Dirk Zeller and Daniel Pauly

NINA Aquatic Research Station, Ims

Advice October 2013

Challenges, Prospects & Opportunities. Seychelles Fisheries Sector

Fisheries and Aquaculture in Croatia

To link to this article:

THE FOURTH GLOBAL FISHERIES ENFORCEMENT TRAINING WORKSHOP

Reconstruction of total marine catches for Aruba, southern Caribbean, Daniel Pauly, Sulan Ramdeen and Aylin Ulman

Marine fisheries of Jamaica: total reconstructed catch

AREAS BEYOND NATIONAL JURISDICTION: INDIAN OCEAN DEVELOPING COASTAL STATES TUNA MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP

Advice October 2014

While oil and gas is the nations largest export product in value, fish is the second largest. Both activities are crucial for the Norwegian economy.

Annex 7: Request on management areas for sandeel in the North Sea

A Threatened Bay: Challenges to the Future of the Penobscot Bay Region and its Communities

Entry Task #: Date: Chapter: Prompt/Question: Entry Task #: Date: Chapter: Prompt/Question: Entry Task #: Date: Chapter: Prompt/Question:

16. Key Facts about Long Run Economic Growth

Nations in Transit 2013: Overall Democracy Scores

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Draft Freshwater Fisheries Management Plan on behalf of Victoria s recreational fishing sector.

Longtail tuna Updated: December 2016 LONGTAIL TUNA

Sustainable Fisheries for Future Generations The Fisheries White Paper

Legislation. Lisa T. Ballance Marine Mammal Biology SIO 133 Spring 2013

Management advisory for the Bay of Bengal hilsa fishery June 2012

Transcription:

Fisheries Centre The University of British Columbia Working Paper Series Working Paper #2015-15 Reconstruction of fisheries catches for Bosnia-Herzegovina: 1950-2010 Davis Iritani, Leonie Färber, Kyrstn Zylich and Dirk Zeller Year: 2015 Email: davisiritani@gmail.com This working paper is made available by the Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.

RECONSTRUCTION OF FISHERIES CATCHES FOR BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA: 1950-2010 Davis Iritani, Leonie Färber, Kyrstn Zylich and Dirk Zeller Sea Around Us, Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, 2202 Main Mall, Vancouver V6T 1Z4, Canada davisiritani@gmail.com; leonie.faerber@gmx.net; k.zylich@fisheries.ubc.ca; d.zeller@fisheries.ubc.ca ABSTRACT The total marine catches made by Bosnian fisheries between 1950 and 2010 were estimated by using officially reported landings as baseline data, including landings reported by the former Yugoslavia that were disaggregated to each member of the former Yugoslavia. The total reconstructed catches were assigned to different fisheries sectors (i.e., artisanal, subsistence, and recreational) by catch type (i.e., reported landings, discards, or unreported catches) by taxon. The total reconstructed marine catches between 1950 and 2010 made by Bosnian fisheries were estimated at around 3,200 t, which is approximately 35 times the 92 t of official landings reported by the FAO on behalf of Bosnia-Herzegovina (including re-allocated former Yugoslavian catches). The majority of the reconstructed unreported catches were attributable to the subsistence sector. Evidently, current methods of accounting for catch in Bosnian fisheries are insufficient to properly assess marine resource use in Bosnian waters and may lead to misinformation when considering fishing and environmental policies, especially in light of Bosnia- Herzegovina s future prospects for EU membership. INTRODUCTION Bosnia and Herzegovina is a country located in Southeastern Europe on the Balkan Peninsula, and is considered an upper-middle income country (http://www.worldbank.org). It is currently a candidate for membership in the European Union, but has historically experienced many changes in politics. During the late 12 th century, Bosnia established a monarchy that lasted until 1463 when it came under Ottoman occupation. Ottoman rule marked a period of drastic social changes including in politics, the ethnic composition of the population, and religious views. In 1878, Bosnia and Herzegovina came under Austro-Hungarian rule. Following WWI, the country joined the Kingdom of Yugoslavia. Bosnia and Herzegovina was occupied by Germany during WWII, and became part of the Socialist Federative Republic of Yugoslavia after WWII until the dissolution of Yugoslavia in 1992. The breakup of Yugoslavia triggered social tensions within Bosnia and Herzegovina, which eventually led to the Bosnian war from 1992 to 1995. Bosnia is almost entirely landlocked, except for a very narrow coastal stretch around the town of Neum. Its potential Exclusive Economic Zone is only 14 km 2 (http://www.seaaroundus.org; Figure 1). Despite its short coastline, Bosnia and Herzegovina still engages in fishing activities. As countries have been repeatedly shown to underreport catches (eg., Zeller et al.2007; Wielgus et al. 2010; Harper and Zeller 2011; Zeller et al. 2011a; Zeller et al. 2011b; Harper et al. 2012; Le Manach et al. 2012), this study aims to estimate the actual catch being taken from Bosnian waters from 1950 to 2010. 1

Figure 1. Coastal area of Bosnia-Herzegovina showing EEZ and shelf areas. METHODS To reconstruct marine catches made by Bosnian fisheries between 1950 and 2010, officially reported landings data from the FAO were used as baseline data. Since landings from 1950 to 1991 were reported as catches made by the former Yugoslavia, tonnages attributable to only Bosnia were first disaggregated by Rizzo and Zeller (2007). Furthermore, between 1992 and 2010, landings reported by the FAO were all labeled as the very uninformative category marine fishes nei. Therefore, to increase taxonomic resolution for these years, the species composition from 1991 was applied to the reported tonnages and assumed to have remained identical for subsequent years up to 2010. The reported landings for Bosnia were assumed to have all been made by the artisanal (i.e., small-scale, commercial) fishing sector and that Bosnia does not have a large-scale, industrial fishing sector. Thus, the taxonomic breakdown of artisanal landings was entirely based on the species composition reported by the FAO. Since we could not find any clear and readily available information on recent Bosnian fisheries, we relied heavily on a detailed catch reconstruction conducted for neighbouring Croatia (Matić-Skoko et al., in press). To estimate unreported catches for the Bosnian artisanal fisheries, the ratio between reported landings and unreported artisanal catches in Croatia between 1950 and 2010 (Matić-Skoko et al., in press) was reduced by half and applied to the baseline data. We used half the Croatian rate, since Bosnia has less fishable area and fewer landings sites that could facilitate under- or misreporting. Discards for the artisanal fisheries were estimated by also using 2

discard rates for Croatian artisanal fisheries (Matić-Skoko et al., in press). The taxonomic composition of discards in Bosnia was assumed to be identical to the discarded demersal taxa in Croatia, and was used at the family level. Subsistence and recreational catches made in Bosnia between 1950 and 2010 were estimated by applying half the per capita catch rate of coastal populations in Croatia to the number of coastal inhabitants in Bosnia. For the purpose of this study, areas within 10 km of the coast were considered coastal. Coastal population data for Bosnia were obtained for 1990, 2000, and 2010 from CIESIN (2012), and estimated for years prior to 1990 as the 1990 percentage of coastal to total Bosnian population, while intervening years were interpolated. For 1950 to 1959, total population data were taken from PopulStat (http://www.populstat.info/). For 1960 to 2010, population data was taken from The World Bank (http://www.worldbank.org/). All subsistence and recreational catches were assigned to family level taxa based on the taxonomic composition found in Croatia. RESULTS/DISCUSSION The total reconstructed marine catches made by Bosnian fisheries were 3,230 t between 1950 and 2010, which was around 35 times the 92 t officially reported by the FAO on behalf of Bosnia (Figure 2a). Total catches increased from around 23 t year -1 in the 1950s to a peak of 79 t in the 1990. Following a decline during the conflict years, catches increased again to around 82 t in 2002 and have been steadily declining since to reach 73 t by 2010 (Figure 2a). The subsistence (i.e., non-commercial) sector accounted for the largest component (72%) of total time series catches, and were all deemed unreported, while unreported recreational (19%) and reported and unreported artisanal landings (3% and 4%, respectively) catches contributed considerably less (Figure 2). Discarding accounted for 46 t over the 1950-2010 time period, and thus contributed approximately 1% to total estimated catches (Figure 2a). Members of the family Clupeidae constituted the majority of Bosnian catches at 1,800 t or 56% of total catch between 1950 and 2010, with 4% being contributed by Sardina pilchardus (Figure 2b). Catches of Engraulidae came to 320 t which is equivalent to 10% of total catch. Scombridae catches were just under 140 t (%) and Centracanthidae contributed almost 80 t (2%). With the exception of S. pilchardus which is caught by artisanal fishers, the majority of the above catches are made within the subsistence sector. This study suggests that total catches made by Bosnian fisheries may be much higher than landings officially reported by the country suggest. Thus, current record keeping methods and regulations may not be sufficient to account for all extractive use of marine resources in Bosnian waters. Under-reporting may misguide decisions when creating new fishing or environmental policies. Therefore, more inclusive and comprehensive methods for tracking fishing practices are recommended, particularly given Bosnia s aspirations for EU membership. As a first step, we suggest local experts repeat the present exercise using local data and information, as suggested by Pauly (1998) and Zeller et al. (2007). 3

90 a) Catch (t) 75 60 45 30 15 Subsistence Recreational Artisanal Reported data 0 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Year 90 b) 75 Others Engraulidae Catch (t) 60 45 30 Scombridae Centracanthidae 15 Clupeidae 0 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Year Figure 2. Total reconstructed catches for Bosnia-Herzegovina for 1950-2010 a) by fishing sectors plus discards, with data officially reported or allocated to Bosnia by Rizzo and Zeller (2007) overlaid as line graph; and b) by major taxa, with others representing 36 taxa with lesser contributions. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This is a contribution of Sea Around Us, a scientific collaboration between the University of British Columbia and The Pew Charitable Trusts. 4

REFERENCES CIESIN (2012) National aggregates of geospatial data collection: Population, landscape, and climate estimates, Version 3 (PLACE III). Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN)/Columbia University. NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC). http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/data/set/nagdc-population-landscape-climate-estimates-v3, Palisades, NY. Harper S and Zeller D, editors (2011) Fisheries catch reconstructions: Islands, Part II. Fisheries Centre Research Reports 19(4). University of British Columbia, Vancouver. 143 p. Harper S, Zylich K, Boonzaier L, Le Manach F, Pauly D and Zeller D, editors (2012) Fisheries catch reconstructions: Islands, Part III. Fisheries Centre Research Reports 20(5), University of British Columbia, Vancouver (Canada). 134 p. Matić-Skoko, S., Soldo, A., Stagličić, N., Blažević, D., Šiljić, J. and Iritani, D. 2014. Croatian Marine Fisheries (Adriatic Sea): 1950-2010. Fisheries Centre Working Paper #2014-26, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 16 p Le Manach F, Gough C, Harris A, Humber F, Harper S and Zeller D (2012) Unreported fishing, hungry people and political turmoil: the recipe for a food security crisis in Madagascar? Marine Policy 36: 218-225. Pauly, D (1998) Rationale for reconstruction catch time series. EC Fisheries Cooperation Bulletin 11(2): 4-10. Rizzo Y and Zeller D (2007) Country disaggregation of catches of former Yugoslavia. pp. 149-156 In Zeller D and Pauly D (eds.), Reconstruction of marine fisheries catches for key countries and regions (1950-2005). Fisheries Centre Research Reports 15(2). University of British Columbia Fisheries Centre, Vancouver. Wielgus J, Zeller D, Caicedo-Herrera D and Sumaila UR (2010) Estimation of fisheries removals and primary economic impact of the small-scale and industrial marine fisheries in Colombia. Marine Policy 34: 506-513. Zeller D, Booth S, Davis G and Pauly D (2007) Re-estimation of small-scale fishery catches for U.S. flag-associated island areas in the western Pacific: the last 50 years. Fishery Bulletin 105(2): 266-277. Zeller D, Booth S, Pakhomov E, Swartz W and Pauly D (2011a) Arctic fisheries catches in Russia, USA and Canada: Baselines for neglected ecosystems. Polar Biology 34(7): 955-973. Zeller D, Rossing P, Harper S, Persson L, Booth S and Pauly D (2011b) The Baltic Sea: estimates of total fisheries removals 1950-2007. Fisheries Research 108: 356-363. 5

Appendix Table A1. FAO landings a vs. total reconstructed catch (in tonnes), and catch by sector, for Bosnia-Herzegovina, 1950-2010. Year FAO landings a Total reconstructed catch Artisanal Subsistence Recreational 1950 0.27 10.3 0.4 7.9 2.1 1951 0.33 14.6 0.5 11.1 3.1 1952 0.36 18.8 0.5 14.3 4.0 1953 0.24 22.9 0.3 17.5 5.0 1954 0.36 23.9 0.5 18.0 5.4 1955 0.24 24.3 0.3 18.3 5.7 1956 0.36 25.1 0.5 18.8 5.9 1957 0.36 26.0 0.5 19.3 6.3 1958 0.42 26.8 0.6 19.7 6.5 1959 0.33 27.3 0.5 20.1 6.8 1960 0.39 28.2 0.5 20.5 7.2 1961 0.45 29.6 0.6 21.6 7.4 1962 0.39 30.8 0.5 22.6 7.6 1963 0.51 32.4 0.7 23.7 8.0 1964 0.72 34.1 1.0 24.8 8.3 1965 0.99 35.9 1.4 25.9 8.7 1966 0.72 36.9 1.0 26.9 9.0 1967 0.48 38.0 0.7 27.9 9.4 1968 0.63 39.1 0.9 28.5 9.7 1969 0.39 39.7 0.5 29.1 10.1 1970 0.32 40.8 0.4 30.1 10.3 1971 0.29 42.1 0.4 31.2 10.5 1972 0.32 43.7 0.4 32.4 10.8 1973 0.31 44.7 0.4 33.1 11.2 1974 0.31 45.8 0.4 33.8 11.6 1975 0.43 47.6 0.6 35.0 12.0 1976 0.35 49.0 0.5 36.1 12.4 1977 0.30 50.5 0.4 37.4 12.7 1978 0.29 51.8 0.4 38.5 12.9 1979 0.24 53.6 0.3 40.0 13.3 1980 0.30 55.5 0.4 41.4 13.7 1981 0.32 57.0 0.4 42.8 13.8 1982 0.31 58.4 0.4 44.2 13.8 1983 0.48 61.4 0.7 46.9 13.9 1984 0.73 63.4 1.0 48.4 14.0 1985 0.36 64.7 0.5 50.1 14.1 1986 1.03 67.8 1.4 52.1 14.3 1987 0.45 69.4 0.6 54.2 14.5 1988 0.55 71.7 0.8 56.3 14.7 1989 0.87 73.6 1.2 57.7 14.7 1990 0.65 77.8 0.9 61.8 15.1 1991 0.37 73.8 0.5 62.2 11.1 1992 1.25 71.6 1.7 62.5 7.3 1993 1.25 66.9 1.7 61.6 3.6 1994 1.25 63.7 1.7 58.4 3.5 1995 1.25 60.5 1.7 55.3 3.5 1996 2.25 62.3 3.1 52.3 6.9 1997 3.25 67.3 4.4 49.4 13.5 1998 4.25 63.6 5.8 44.5 13.2 1999 5.25 56.9 7.2 36.7 13.0 2000 5.25 64.2 7.2 44.2 12.8 2001 5.25 67.2 7.2 47.3 12.7 2002 5.25 74.2 7.2 54.4 12.6 2003 5.00 70.5 6.8 51.3 12.4 2004 5.00 70.7 6.8 51.5 12.3 2005 5.00 67.8 6.8 48.8 12.2 2006 5.00 67.2 6.8 48.3 12.1 2007 5.00 66.6 6.8 47.8 12.0 2008 5.00 66.0 6.8 47.3 11.8 2009 5.00 65.4 6.8 46.9 11.7 2010 5.00 64.8 6.8 46.4 11.6 a FAO landings are reported by Bosnia for 1992-2010. Reported catch for 1950-1991 has been disaggregated from the Former Yugoslavia FAO data. 6

Appendix Table A2. Reconstructed total catch (in tonnes) by major taxonomic groups for Bosnia-Herzegovina, 1950 to 2010. Others represents 36 additional minor taxa. Year Clupeidae Engraulidae Scombridae Centracanthidae Others 1950 6.5 0.3 1.1 0.5 2.4 1951 7.7 0.4 1.4 1.1 4.5 1952 9.8 0.7 3.0 1.2 4.7 1953 13.9 0.8 3.3 1.0 4.3 1954 10.6 1.3 4.8 1.3 6.5 1955 8.0 2.6 4.1 1.7 8.3 1956 10.7 2.7 3.7 1.6 7.1 1957 12.6 2.1 3.8 1.2 7.0 1958 14.7 1.6 2.9 1.4 6.9 1959 10.5 1.9 4.8 1.3 9.3 1960 14.8 1.4 3.0 1.6 8.1 1961 15.2 3.6 3.0 1.2 7.3 1962 15.4 4.5 1.6 1.7 8.2 1963 14.1 4.8 5.1 1.5 7.8 1964 14.3 6.6 4.2 1.7 8.4 1965 19.6 2.9 1.4 1.6 12.0 1966 15.7 6.1 3.6 1.5 11.2 1967 16.1 8.5 2.1 1.5 10.5 1968 20.4 5.8 1.8 1.6 10.5 1969 20.8 5.4 1.4 1.5 11.1 1970 23.0 4.2 0.7 1.5 11.9 1971 23.4 4.0 0.7 1.3 13.2 1972 27.2 3.0 0.6 1.4 12.0 1973 30.3 2.2 0.5 1.3 10.9 1974 29.2 3.4 0.8 1.3 11.6 1975 29.2 4.0 1.2 1.2 12.7 1976 31.8 3.4 1.5 0.9 12.1 1977 33.7 2.5 1.7 1.1 12.0 1978 33.9 3.6 1.6 0.9 12.3 1979 34.5 3.0 1.3 1.3 13.8 1980 36.6 2.0 1.1 1.2 15.0 1981 40.3 1.9 0.6 1.1 13.7 1982 40.0 1.2 0.9 1.4 15.5 1983 44.9 1.0 1.4 1.1 13.8 1984 44.3 1.6 1.2 1.2 16.3 1985 41.2 3.9 1.4 1.2 17.5 1986 45.8 0.9 1.9 1.3 19.6 1987 50.1 0.5 1.4 1.2 17.0 1988 49.2 0.6 3.6 1.0 18.2 1989 51.6 0.6 1.6 0.9 20.4 1990 54.7 1.4 2.4 0.9 19.4 1991 51.0 2.3 2.9 2.5 15.7 1992 44.7 2.0 2.2 2.5 21.4 1993 38.6 1.6 3.0 2.6 22.3 1994 34.8 1.3 2.4 2.5 23.9 1995 31.4 5.3 1.1 1.7 22.3 1996 36.3 5.6 1.3 1.4 20.5 1997 33.9 11.9 1.3 1.5 23.2 1998 39.7 7.1 1.7 1.3 19.8 1999 34.2 10.4 1.3 1.0 17.8 2000 36.8 13.6 1.4 1.0 19.2 2001 40.8 10.5 1.2 1.0 21.6 2002 43.5 15.2 2.2 0.7 20.4 2003 46.4 9.8 3.6 0.6 18.3 2004 32.4 24.0 3.4 0.4 18.5 2005 34.2 15.0 4.5 0.5 21.9 2006 35.0 15.1 3.2 0.6 21.5 2007 34.9 15.1 3.0 0.4 21.3 2008 33.2 15.4 2.9 0.4 22.2 2009 38.1 14.4 1.9 0.4 18.7 2010 37.3 15.0 2.2 0.4 18.1 7